Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
deed of the date of the issuance of the certificate of title over the property. But this rule applies only
when the plaintiff is not in possession of the property, since if a person claiming to be the owner thereof
is in actual possession of the property, the right to seek reconveyance, which in effect seeks to quiet
title to the property, does not prescribe.
2. Whether the Glors' cause of action accrued not in 1967 but in 1988, and as mere homestead
transferees, cannot maintain an action for reconveyance?
It was also held that the Glors and their predecessors-in-interest Cornelio Glor, Sr. and Eutiquio Pureza
were in actual possession of the property since 1950. Their undisturbed possession gave them
continuing right to seek aid of a court of equity to determine nature of Olviga's adverse claim, who in
1988, disturbed their possession. Thus, the right to quiet the property's title which seeks reconveyance
and annulment of any certificate of title, accrues only from the time the possessor was made aware of
the adverse claim and it is only from that time that the statutory period of prescription commences to
run against him/her. It also stated that the actual possessor of a piece of land claiming to be its owner
may wait until disturbance of his/her possession or the attack of his/her title before taking steps in
vindication of his/her right because his undisturbed possession gives him a continuing right to seek the
aid of a court of equity to ascertain and determine the nature of the adverse claim of a third party and
its effect on his own title, which right can be claimed only by one who is in possession.