Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Lecture16
Personnel Requirements
The planning of personnel requirements includes planning for:
Employee parking,
Locker rooms,
Restrooms,
Food services,
Drinking fountains, and
Health services.
Personnel requirements became more important with the advent of the 1989 American
with Disabilities Act (ADA) which addresses barrier-free designs.
Philosophies relating to personnel:
Our firm is responsible for our employees from the moment they leave their
home until they return. We must provide adequate methods of getting to and
from work.
Employees spend one third of their life within our facility; we must help
them enjoy working here.
Assignment: Investigate the working conditions and personnel requirements at
Googleplex, San Jose, CA.
Employee Parking
The procedure of planning employee parking:
1. Determine the number of automobiles to be parked.
2. Determine the space required for each automobile.
3. Determine the available space for parking.
4. Determine alternative parking layouts for alternative parking patterns.
5. Select the layout that best utilizes space and maximizes employee
convenience.
Care must be used when determining the number of automobiles to be parked. For
remote sites not being serviced by public transportation, a parking space may be
required for every 1.25 employees. At the other extreme, a centralized location served
by public transportation may require a parking space for every three employees.
The number of parking spaces to be provided must be specifically determined for
each facility and must b in accordance with local zoning regulations. Attention should
99
Lecture16
The factors to be considered in determining the specification for a specific parking lot
are:
1. The percentage of automobiles to be parked that are compact automobiles. As
a planning guideline, if more specific data are not available, 33% of all
parking is often allocated to compact automobiles.
2. Increasing the area provided for parking decreases the amount of time required
to park and de-park.
3. Angular configurations allow quicker turnover; perpendicular parking yields
greater space utilization.
4. As the angle of parking space increases, so does the required space allocated
to aisles.
In table 1, there are 3 car groups, (G1-small cars, G2-standard cars, G3-large cars).
For a given groups, there are corresponding stall widths (SW) options. For each stall
width option, there are 4 configurations; W1, W2, W3, and W4 (figure 2). Each
configuration for a given SW has 10 corresponding angles of park, and a
associated W dimension.
Using the information from figures 1, 2 and table 1, the facilities planner can generate
several parking layout alternatives that will optimize the space allocated for parking
and maximize employee convenience.
100
Group I:
Small Cars
Group II:
Standard Cars
Group III:
Large Cars
SW W 45
8'0" 1 25'9"
2 40'10"
3 38'9"
4 36'8"
8'6" 1 32'0"
2 49'10"
3 47'8"
4 45'3"
9'0" 1 32'0"
2 49'4"
3 46'4"
4 44'8"
9'6" 1 32'0"
2 49'2"
3 47'0"
4 44'8"
9'0" 1 32'7"
2 50'2"
3 47'9"
4 45'5"
9'6" 1 32'4"
2 49'11"
3 47'7"
4 45'3"
10'0" 1 32'4"
2 49'11"
3 57'7"
4 45'3"
50
26'6"
42'0"
40'2"
38'3"
32'11"
51'9"
49'4"
46'10"
32'9"
51'0"
48'10"
46'6"
32'8"
50'6"
48'2"
45'10"
33'0"
51'2"
49'1"
46'11"
32'8"
50'11"
48'9"
46'8"
32'8"
50'11"
48'9"
46'8"
ANGLE OF PARK
550
600
650
27'2" 29'4" 31'9"
43'11" 45'8" 48'2
41'5" 44'2" 47'0"
39'9" 42'9" 45'9"
34'2" 36'2" 38'5"
53'10" 56'0" 58'4"
51'6" 54'0" 56'6"
49'0" 51'8" 54'6"
34'0" 35'4" 37'6"
53'2" 55'6" 57'10"
51'4" 53'10" 56'0"
49'0" 51'6" 54'0"
34'0" 35'0" 36'10"
51'10" 53'6" 55'4"
49'10" 51'6" 53'11"
47'6" 49'10" 52'6"
34'0" 35'11" 38'3"
53'3" 55'4" 58'0"
52'3" 53'8" 56'2"
49'0" 51'8" 54'9"
33'10" 34'11" 37'2"
52'2" 54'0" 56'6"
50'2" 52'4" 55'1"
48'5" 50'8" 53'8"
33'10" 34'11" 37'2"
52'2" 54'0" 56'6"
50'2" 52'5" 55'1"
48'5" 50'8" 53'8"
Lecture16
700
34'0"
50'6"
49'6"
48'6"
41'0"
60'2"
59'0"
57'10"
39'8"
60'0"
58'8"
57'0"
38'10"
58'0"
57'0"
55'9"
40'11"
60'4"
59'2"
58'0"
39'11"
59'3"
58'4"
57'0"
39'11"
59'3"
58'4"
57'0"
750
36'2"
52'7"
51'10"
51'1"
43'6"
62'0"
61'2"
60'0"
42'0"
61'10"
61'0"
59'8"
41'6"
60'6"
59'8"
58'9"
43'6"
62'9"
61'11"
61'0"
42'5"
61'9"
60'11"
59'10"
42'5"
61'9"
60'11"
59'10"
800
38'2"
54'4"
53'10"
53'4"
45'6"
63'6"
63'0"
62'6"
44'4"
63'4"
63'0"
62'0"
43'8"
62'8"
62'0"
61'6"
45'5"
64'3"
63'9"
63'2"
45'0"
63'4"
62'10"
52'2"
45'0"
63'4"
62'11"
62'2"
850
40'0"
55'11"
55'8"
55'5"
46'11"
64'9"
64'6"
64'3"
46'2"
64'9"
64'6"
64'2"
46'0"
64'6"
64'3"
63'10"
46'9"
65'5"
65'2"
64'10"
46'6"
64'8"
64'6"
64'1"
46'6"
64'8"
64'6"
64'1"
900
41'9"
57'2"
57'2"
57'2"
48'0"
66'0"
66'0"
66'0"
48'0"
66'0"
66'0"
66'0"
48'0"
65'11"
65'11"
65'11"
48'0"
66'0"
66'0"
66'0"
48'0"
66'0"
66'0"
66'0"
48'0"
66'0"
66'0"
66'0"
Table 1. Parking dimensions for each car group as a function of single and double
loaded model
101
Lecture16
An important issue related to parking lot planning is the location of facility entrances
and exists or ingress and egress conditions. Employees should not be required to walk
more than 500 ft from their parking place to the entrance of the facility. The entrances
should be convenient not only to their parking locations, but also to their place of
work.
Example:
A new facility is to have 200 employees. A survey of similar facilities that one
parking space must be provided for every two employees and that 40% of all
automobiles driven to work are compact automobiles. Five percent of the spaces
should be allocated for the handicapped. The available parking lot space is 180 ft and
200 ft deep. What is the best parking layout?
Solution:
If the facility were to have the same number of parking spaces as similar facilities,
100 spaces would be required. Of these 100 spaces, 40 could be for compact
automobiles. However, not all drivers of compact cars will park in a compact space.
Therefore, only 30 compact spaces will be provided.
Begin the layout of the lot using 900 double-loaded, two-way traffic because of its
efficient use of space to determine if the available lot is adequate. From figure 2, W4
is the required module option. Using the W4 module and table 1, we can obtain the
following:
Compact cars (80)
900, W4
Standard cars (86)
900, W4
Module width
572
660
Check to see if the depth of the lot (200ft) can accommodate a parking layout
consisting of 2 modules of standard cars and 1 compact module,
2(66 ft) + 1(572) = 1892
1892 < 200 ft, therefore depth requirement OK.
Each compact module row will yield a car capacity based on the width of the lot (180
ft) divided by the width requirement per stall (8) times the rows per module (2).
180
Similarly, each standard module row will yield a car capacity based on the width of
the lot (180 ft) divided by the width requirement per stall (8.5) times the number of
rows per module (2) times the number of modules (2).
180
102
Lecture16
Total possible = 44 + 84 = 128, which is greater than the required number. Therefore,
module configuration (W4) is feasible. A possible alternative of (2 rows/modules 2
standard rows) + (2 rows/module 1compact row) for a total of six rows is a starting
point for the layout.
Modifying the layout to account for handicap requirements and circulation reveals the
following:
Row 1 will handle all five handicap spaces = 5(12) = 60
The remaining space will be occupied by standard cars
(180-60)/8.5 = 14 spaces
Row adjusting for two circulation lanes of 15 each number 2 will handle
[180 (152)]/8.5 = 17 spaces
Row 3 and 4 will yield the same number of spaces
Row 5 will have
(180-6)/8 = 18 spaces
Row 6 will handle
180/8 = 22 spaces
Compact
Standard
14
17
17
17
18
22
40
___
65
103
Handicap
5
___
5
Lecture16
104