Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
APE Period 7
March 25, 2009
I. Intro
A. Attn Grabber: Anecdote/Example of doctor given choice to save
4 lives to kill 1
B. Link to how Mills would approve & tell why this is wrong
C. Thesis: Although Mill’s basic principle of pursuing strictly
happiness appeals to our intuitive nature; it is in fact
unachievable because of the conflicting ideas of happiness and
the ultimate perversion of human worth.
II. My happiness is not your happiness & cant compare
A. Monetary gains vs. Intangible such as happiness or love
B. Different morals and perspectives Cannot be a universal
standard for everyone
C. Inability to compare the benefits, of which is better forms of
happiness
D. Impact: never solve anything, no standard ethics. Different
values
III. Say we take the idea of max happiness max goods for max
people
A. Relate the anecdote
1. Saving the life of 1 vs 4.
2. Lose the ethics if accept util—people just become a
means and not unique anymore
1. Hiroshima & Nagasaki bomb killed and hurt thousands
and thousands, ended war
IV. Conclusion
B. Uniqueness of life & inability to compare the varying opinions
will ultimately lead to:
1. Conflicting interests, never know standard of right and
wrong
2. Undermine the sanctity of human life.