Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
: A
Radical Yet Rigorous Approach To Understanding The
Complexities and Subtleties Of The Driving Forces Of Change In
Century 21 -- By Andres Agostini at
www.linkedin.com/in/AndresAgostini -- Arlington, Virginia 22202,
USA
For the first time in history, we can work backward from our
imagination rather than forward from our past. “In the midst of
chaos, there is a learning lesson to assimilate. Sometimes the
table is served for an OVER-LEARNING if the prepared mind is
paying huge attention to the nano-granularity of details.” (Andy –
Andres Agostini, Nov/23/2001, 8:34 p.m. EST).
The term singularity entered the popular science culture with the
1993 presentation at NASA-sponsored conference of a seminal
paper by San Diego State University statistician Vernor Vinge.
The abstract of the famous essay is as daunting today as it was
more than a decade ago: Permalink:
http://www.ArchSingularity.blogspot.com
This FUTURE, that throws around its weight through every facet
of the PRESENT impiously, might be 99.99% INEVITABLE.
Inevitability, in this instance, equates to meaning that it will be a
rogue dictator, over-ruling capriciously and solely by its way and
taste. The unavoidable consequences of this FUTURE can be
mitigated or at least somehow modulated. Evidently, this
FUTURE’s UPSIDES can, perhaps, be seized and even
amplified. To meet both requisites, there is one HUGE
prerequisite before proceeding any further. That is, that the
TOTALITY of HUMANKIND has to converge AT UNISON—‘on
the doubles’—on the most essentials Herculean tasks to do in
order to attempt the sustainability of the corresponding civilization
as it is known / perceived now.
Possibly, this FUTURE will not have—as per the hopes treasured
by all-walks-of-life eyewitnesses—a ‘natural tendency.’ Stated
plainly, because it is being envisioned and worked-out
preternaturally, this FUTURE may appear – before our naked
eyes – with extreme tendencies and directives that evoke the
most extravagant and transhuman mandate. The terms
“extravagant” and “transhuman,” in this case, apply for even the
ultimately leading-edge practitioner of the scientific realm, either
within the eminent establishment, or those with an
unauthenticated citizenship from the avant-garde renegade-verse.
It might be a genuine deal, it might not?
At the time being, it does not matter anymore where you come
from and how this impact your ‘current’ PRESENT. Instead, what
is presently relevant for you to envision are the floating, fluxing,
cross-railed FUTURES as they climb the treacherous
building-block ladder, the ladder of accumulation of opportunities,
challenges, and perplexing, but exuberant, trade-offs. These
trade-offs poise the least thinkable of the unthinkable results,
challenging our body (physiology), mind (psychology), and soul
(spirituality). To apply, say, for practical leadership credentials will
be a nearly, though not impossible, insurmountable enterprise for
Life.
You know what the PAST is? Reply: The eternal flow of
increasing creative-tension discrepancies between the FUTURE
and the PRESENT, encapsulated in a stream of segments from
the ‘preterit tense’ kingdom, a kingdom that is neither awaken nor
significant anymore.
‘Here’, while in the PAST, was a bit statistical but never really so.
The so-called ‘here’ is undergoing a total immersion of
numberless processes, throughputs, transactions, deeds, etc.
‘Here’ has always been mobilized. ‘Now’ is motorized at a rate
that is beyond awe-inspiring. We just got the ‘now’ about right to
this point. To turn savvier on this FUTURE, one must be a genius
in his executions (sic) yoctosecond by yoctosecond.
Then, he / she has to make the greatest effort of all, that is, to
think unthinkably in relation to present forces and respective
futuristic trends—both subtle and dramatic ones as well as those
driving and marshaling and enforcing just brute-force dramatic
ones—by means of the practical implementation of scenario
planning.
All of this is true for humans from the PAST and the PRESENT.
Toward a more advanced time—and by means of
reverse-engineering with the omniscience perspective—the
humans will increasingly be of different constituents and design.
WRAPPING UP
But the German philosopher, Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche,
reiterates that if we change the present we can change the future,
and if we change the future – as well as the way we proactively
and qualitatively envision and practice it through futuristic
scenario methods – we will be changing the present in fact and
taking increasing control over the negative circumstances that
impact us so dramatically. In actuality, we must change both the
PRESENT and the FUTURE simultaneously and at once. The
PRESENT’s vest interest into the FUTURE is too huge not to note
it immediately. Nietzsche, thereby, stated exactly: "It’s our future
that lays down the law of our today."
AN IN EXCELSIS CRITICO-CREATIVE THINKING
PRESCRIPTION TO ILLUSTRATE SUCCESS CAPTURING IN
18 STEPS! By © Copyright 2010 Andres Agostini – All Rights Re
OBJECTIVE
3.- Okay, Bacon has spoken loud and clear. People who listen to
him benefits greatly. Those who don’t are in shock, bewilderment,
and even undergoing times of struggle regardless of the Era. We
have the choice to ignore his extreme wisdom or we can accept
and practice it thoroughly in every facet of our lives. The
undersigned firmly suggests either one or the other, since “gray
scales” type of choices will not work for us at all. The term
“extreme” sometimes can be optimal. See, for instance, NASA’s
effort in sending an unmanned Rover to Mars. Wasn’t that
over-perfection after traveling – by means of highly sophisticated
telemetry – some 120 million miles into outer space and a perfect
landing on Mars?
10.- Wernher von Braun offers his great concern about education,
which is quite practical to put into a bigger perspective what
Sagan has stated. Therefore, Sagan summarized it this way:
“EThe average citizen today, of course, has far more scientific
information at his disposal than did those greatest of intellects of
earlier times. Yet paradoxically, I think that THERE HAS NEVER
BEEN A GREATER NEED FOR INCREASED
UNDERSTANDING AND APPRECIATION OF SCIENCE. It has
been said that, although the choice of direction for our civilization
will be determined through democratic process, it is there that the
problem begins. TO MAKE RATIONAL CHOICES, THE
AVERAGE CITIZEN MUST UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND
ROLE OF SCIENCE AT A TIME WHEN ITS BREADTH AND
COMPLEXITY ARE INCREASING ALMOST EXPONENTIALLY
.... Conversely, the scientist, at a time when he can barely keep
up to date in his specialty, must not isolate himself in his parochial
interest. Instead, he should see his profession as a part of the
larger world, to evaluate himself and his work in relation to all
forces, especially the humanities, which shape and advance
society. THE NEED, THEN, IS FOR AN EDUCATIONAL
PROCESS RESULTING IN MORE SCIENTIFIC LITERACY FOR
THE LAYMAN, AND MORE LITERACY IN THE HUMANITIES
FOR THE SCIENTISTS .... Man in this scientific age is free only
to the extent that he has a grasp on himself and his surroundings.
FREEDOM – THE ABILITY TO SPEAK, THINK, ACT, AND VOTE
INTELLIGENTLY – is based largely on our ability TO MAKE
CHOICES growing out of our understanding of the issues
involved. With each advance of science, there is an invitation to
more understanding. This is the essence of the burden borne by
all peoples since the dawn of humanity. There must be
widespread understanding of the role of science in modern
society, both as to its limits and our dependence on its basic
function as a tool for our survival. This is the imperative for
scientific literacy .... How do we encourage scientific literacy? I
THINK THE PROBLEM IS HOW TO INSTILL IN STUDENTS A
PERMANENT DESIRE TO LEARN. All youth is endowed with
curiosity from the very beginning. What can education process do,
not only to keep this natural curiosity alive, but to make it a
permanent part of the individual drive? E Students should be
encouraged, beyond learning facts, to be intrigued by objects and
events in their environment, as well as to become aware of and
responsive in a positive manner to beauty and orderliness in their
environment. THEY SHOULD BE TAUGHT TO WILLINGLY
SUBJECT THEIR DATA AND IDEAS TO CRITICISM OF THEIR
PEERS WHILE ACQUIRING A CRITICAL, QUESTIONING
ATTITUDE TOWARD INFERENCES, HYPOTHESES AND
THEORIES. Early in education, they should be led to recognize
the limitations of scientific modes of inquiry and the need for
additional, quite different approaches to the quest for reality E
ULTIMATELY, THEY SHOULD BE INSTILLED WITH AN
APPRECIATION FOR THE INTERRELATEDNESS OF
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY .... This is essentially
the scientific method. By learning the scientific method, students
will understand its role in society and at the same time to think for
themselves. LEARNING TO THINK FOR ONESELF, IN TURN,
IMPARTS A DEEP SENSE OF FREEDOM. ONCE TESTED, AN
APPETITE FOR IT IS FORMED WHICH MAY WELL ENDURE
THROUGHOUT LIFE .... But if our young people are going to gain
the appetite, our schools, our colleges, our universities, must bear
an ever greater responsibility. ALL TOO MANY TIMES IN THE
PAST, EDUCATION – PARTICULARLY IN THE SCIENTIFIC
DISCIPLINES – HAS PLACED EXTREMELY HEAVY EMPHASIS
ON TRANSMITTING THE ESTABLISHED KNOWLEDGE OF
THE PAST. THERE HAS BEEN A TENDENCY FOR TEACHERS
TO ASSIGN, AND TO ENCOURAGE ROTE LEARNING,
INSTEAD OF TAKING THE ADMITTEDLY MORE DIFFICULT
PATH OF ENCOURAGING STUDENTS TO THINK FOR
THEMSELVES .... THE MAINSPRING OF SCIENCE IS
CURIOSITY. SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL, THERE HAVE
ALWAYS BEEN MEN AND WOMEN WHO FELT A BURNING
DESIRE TO KNOW WHAT WAS UNDER THE ROCK, BEYOND
THE HILLS, ACROSS THE OCEANS. THIS RESTLESS BREED
NOW WANT TO KNOW WHAT MAKES AN ATOM WORK,
THROUGH WHAT PROCESS LIFE REPRODUCES ITSELF, OR
WHAT IS THE GEOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE MOON.”
WRAPPING UP
For the first time in history, we can work backward from our
imagination rather than forward from our past. “In the midst of
chaos, there is a learning lesson to assimilate. Sometimes the
table is served for an OVER-LEARNING if the prepared mind is
paying huge attention to the nano-granularity of details.” (Andy –
Andres Agostini, Nov/23/2001, 8:34 p.m. EST).
The term singularity entered the popular science culture with the
1993 presentation at NASA-sponsored conference of a seminal
paper by San Diego State University statistician Vernor Vinge.
The abstract of the famous essay is as daunting today as it was
more than a decade ago: Permalink:
http://www.ArchSingularity.blogspot.com
Possibly, this FUTURE will not have—as per the hopes treasured
by all-walks-of-life eyewitnesses—a ‘natural tendency.’ Stated
plainly, because it is being envisioned and worked-out
preternaturally, this FUTURE may appear – before our naked
eyes – with extreme tendencies and directives that evoke the
most extravagant and transhuman mandate. The terms
“extravagant” and “transhuman,” in this case, apply for even the
ultimately leading-edge practitioner of the scientific realm, either
within the eminent establishment, or those with an
unauthenticated citizenship from the avant-garde renegade-verse.
It might be a genuine deal, it might not?
At the time being, it does not matter anymore where you come
from and how this impact your ‘current’ PRESENT. Instead, what
is presently relevant for you to envision are the floating, fluxing,
cross-railed FUTURES as they climb the treacherous
building-block ladder, the ladder of accumulation of opportunities,
challenges, and perplexing, but exuberant, trade-offs. These
trade-offs poise the least thinkable of the unthinkable results,
challenging our body (physiology), mind (psychology), and soul
(spirituality). To apply, say, for practical leadership credentials will
be a nearly, though not impossible, insurmountable enterprise for
Life.
You know what the PAST is? Reply: The eternal flow of
increasing creative-tension discrepancies between the FUTURE
and the PRESENT, encapsulated in a stream of segments from
the ‘preterit tense’ kingdom, a kingdom that is neither awaken nor
significant anymore.
‘Here’, while in the PAST, was a bit statistical but never really so.
The so-called ‘here’ is undergoing a total immersion of
numberless processes, throughputs, transactions, deeds, etc.
‘Here’ has always been mobilized. ‘Now’ is motorized at a rate
that is beyond awe-inspiring. We just got the ‘now’ about right to
this point. To turn savvier on this FUTURE, one must be a genius
in his executions (sic) yoctosecond by yoctosecond.
Then, he / she has to make the greatest effort of all, that is, to
think unthinkably in relation to present forces and respective
futuristic trends—both subtle and dramatic ones as well as those
driving and marshaling and enforcing just brute-force dramatic
ones—by means of the practical implementation of scenario
planning.
All of this is true for humans from the PAST and the PRESENT.
Toward a more advanced time—and by means of
reverse-engineering with the omniscience perspective—the
humans will increasingly be of different constituents and design.
WRAPPING UP
But the German philosopher, Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche,
reiterates that if we change the present we can change the future,
and if we change the future – as well as the way we proactively
and qualitatively envision and practice it through futuristic
scenario methods – we will be changing the present in fact and
taking increasing control over the negative circumstances that
impact us so dramatically. In actuality, we must change both the
PRESENT and the FUTURE simultaneously and at once. The
PRESENT’s vest interest into the FUTURE is too huge not to note
it immediately. Nietzsche, thereby, stated exactly: "It’s our future
that lays down the law of our today."
(*)
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/definition-of-transformati
ve-and-integrative-risk-management-authored-by-copyright-2005-
andres-agostini-andy-arlington-virginia-usa
(**) http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-2094865
ANDRES AGOSTINI
ANDRES AGOSTINI
CONCLUSION
John Quincy Adams: “My toast would be, may our country be
always successful, but whether successful or otherwise, always
right.”
George Bernard Shaw: “The people who get on in this world are
the ones who get up and look for the circumstances they want
and, if they can’t find them, make them.”
Konrad Lorenz: “It is a good morning exercise for a research
scientist to discard a pet hypothesis every day before breakfast.”
Confucius: “Choose a job you love, and you will never have to
work a day in your life.”
Jim Rohn: “It is the set of the sails, not the direction of wind that
determines which way we will go.”
Anonymous: “There are many things in life that will catch you eye,
but only a few that will catch your heart E. Pursue those.”
“In war [as well as in coping with major and complex leadership,
business and management enterprises and the competition]
nothing is accomplished except through calculations [applied
qualitative and analytical analyzes, not just mathematical
modeling]. ANYTHING THAT IS NOT PROFOUNDLY
MEDITATED IN DETAILS WILL PRODUCE NO RESULT.
Matters [and/or challenges and their intricacies, subtleties and
complexities, as well as because of the nature of said matters] are
contemplated over a long period of time and, TO ATTAIN
SUCCESS [to capture your goals and objective], YOU MUST
DEVOTE SEVERAL MONTHS TO THINKING ABOUT WHAT
MIGHT HAPPEN [that is, ‘onmi mode’-ly thinking unthinkably for
Life and by becoming engaged in ‘futures practicing’ by most
advanced, unconstrained scenario methods]. IF I TAKE SO
MANY PRECAUTIONS [knowing that the granularity of details is
ever-increasingly more detailed and subtle], IT IS BECAUSE MY
HABIT IS TO LEAVE NOTHING TO CHANGE (Oxford Dictionary
and American Heritage: “EWay of things happen of themselves,
fortune; undersigned occurrence; probability; course of events
regarded as E fate; fortuitousE THE UNKNOWN AND
UNPREDICTABLE ELEMENT IN HAPPENINGS THAT SEEMS
TO HAVE NO ASSIGNABLE CAUSE E A FORCE ASSUMED
TO CAUSE EVENTS THAT CANNOT BE FORESEEN OR
CONTROLLED; LUCK ... OFTEN CHANCES ... THE
LIKELIHOOD OF SOMETHING HAPPENING; POSSIBILITY OR
PROBABILITY E AN ACCIDENTAL OR UNPREDICTABLE
EVENT E”
While the project leader was NASA, the prominent and admirable
organization led some 4,000 contractors into palpable,
unquestionable success (The achievement of something desired,
planned, or attempted E The gaining of fame or prosperity E The
extent of such gain E One that is successful E favorable or
desired outcome E attainment of wealth, favor, or eminenceE).
Many years later, the NASA Rover landed on Mars as per the
exact specifications and provisions by the world’s most important
space agency. THE ROVER TRAVELLED SEVERAL MILLION
MILES TO MAKE IT THERE SUCCESSFULLY. Five minutes
after landing on Mars, it immediately started to send data back to
the Houston Command Center. THIS MISSION WAS NOT
“COOL,” “WOW,” OR ANYTHING ELSE BY THE MOST
EXTREME OVER-PERFECTION EVER SEEN. DO YOU STILL
THINK THAT VOLTAIRE’S INFAMOUS QUOTATION, HERE
DISCUSSED, HAS UNQUESTIONABLE VALIDITY? REALLY?
In the word of science, there is no “good,” “bad,” or “excellent”
parlance I am not sorry to state. What one can find, under the
serious framework, are “ACCEPTABLE,” “INCONSEQUENTIAL”
OR “INEFFECTUAL,” AND “OPTIMUM.”
“Humans are creative beings. They think and are the source of all
knowledge for society, whether in the form of new sources of
power E , new methods of communication, faster and cheaper
personal transportation, or an improved method for irrigating
crops. We continue to create new ideas that add to the world’s
storehouse of knowledge. Humans have been adding to their total
knowledge steadily over the centuries, and the amount of
knowledge we create is multiplying at an incredible rate.
Beginning with the amount of knowledge in the known world at
the time of Christ, studies have estimated that THE FIRST
DOUBLING OF THAT KNOWLEDGE TOOK PLACE ABOUT
1700 A.D. THE SECOND DOUBLING OCCURRED AROUND
THE YEAR 1900. IT IS ESTIMATED TODAY THAT THE
WORLD’S KNOWLEDGE BASE WILL DOUBLE AGAIN BY 2010
AND AGAIN BY 2013.”
For the first time in history, we can work backward from our
imagination rather than forward from our past. “In the midst of
chaos, there is a learning lesson to assimilate. Sometimes the
table is served for an OVER-LEARNING if the prepared mind is
paying huge attention to the nano-granularity of details.” (Andy –
Andres Agostini, Nov/23/2001, 8:34 p.m. EST).
The term singularity entered the popular science culture with the
1993 presentation at NASA-sponsored conference of a seminal
paper by San Diego State University statistician Vernor Vinge.
The abstract of the famous essay is as daunting today as it was
more than a decade ago:
Permalink: http://www.ArchSingularity.blogspot.com
This FUTURE, that throws around its weight through every facet
of the PRESENT impiously, might be 99.99% INEVITABLE.
Inevitability, in this instance, equates to meaning that it will be a
rogue dictator, over-ruling capriciously and solely by its way and
taste. The unavoidable consequences of this FUTURE can be
mitigated or at least somehow modulated. Evidently, this
FUTURE’s UPSIDES can, perhaps, be seized and even
amplified. To meet both requisites, there is one HUGE
prerequisite before proceeding any further. That is, that the
TOTALITY of HUMANKIND has to converge—‘on the
doubles’—on the most essentials Herculean tasks to do in order
to attempt the sustainability of the corresponding civilization as it
is known / perceived now.
Possibly, this FUTURE will not have—as per the hopes treasured
by all-walks-of-life eyewitnesses—a ‘natural tendency.’ Put
plainly, because it is being envisioned and worked-out
preternaturally, this FUTURE may appear – before our naked
eyes – with extreme tendencies and directives that evoke the
most extravagant and transhuman mandate. The terms
“extravagant” and “transhuman,” in this case, apply for even the
ultimately leading-edge practitioner of the scientific realm, either
within the eminent establishment, or those with an
unauthenticated citizenship from the avant-garde renegade-verse.
It might be a genuine deal, it might not?
At the time being, it does not matter anymore where you come
from and how this impact your ‘current’ PRESENT. Instead, what
is presently relevant for you to envision are the floating, fluxing,
cross-railed FUTURES as they climb the treacherous
building-block ladder, the ladder of accumulation of opportunities,
challenges, and perplexing, but exuberant, tradeoffs. These
tradeoffs poise the least thinkable of the unthinkable results,
challenging our body (physiology), mind (psychology), and soul
(spirituality). To apply for practical leadership credentials will be a
nearly, though not impossible, insurmountable enterprise.
You know what the PAST is? Reply: The eternal creative-tension
discrepancies between the FUTURE and the PRESENT,
encapsulated in a stream of segments from the ‘preterit tense’
kingdom, a kingdom that is neither awaken nor significant.
‘Here’, while in the PAST, was a bit statistical but never really so.
The so-called ‘here’ is undergoing a total immersion of
numberless processes, transactions, deeds, etc. ‘Here’ has
always been mobilized. ‘Now’ is motorized at a rate that is beyond
awe-inspiring. We just got the ‘now’ about right to this point. To
turn savvier on this FUTURE, one must be a genius in his
executions (sic).
Then, he / she has to make the greatest effort of all, that is, to
think unthinkably in relation to present forces and respective
futuristic trends—both subtle and dramatic ones as well as those
driving and marshalling and enforcing just brute-force dramatic
ones—by means of the practical implementation of scenario
planning.
All of this is true for humans from the PAST and the PRESENT.
Toward a more advanced time—and by means of
reverse-engineering with the omniscience perspective—the
humans will increasingly be of different constituents and design.
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/wall-street-and-main-str
eets-outrageous-inconvenient-facts-by-andres-agostini-arlington-v
irginia-usa-presentation
Amorality and immorality, beyond and above the banks and the
stock markets of the world (and beginning with WORLDWIDE
‘Main Streeters’), will ascertain the ultimate struggle to each and
every specie on the face of Earth. IF WE, THE
MOST-ADVANCED HOMINOIDS WISH IT TO BE OTHERWISE
AND INSTILL VIABILITY TO OUR ONLY SPACECRAFT (THAT
ONE THAT HOUSES THE 700-BILLION PEOPLE), THERE IS A
MUCH BETTER CHANGE, NOT AN IMPEACHABLE
GUARANTEE THOUGH. QUESTION: WHAT WILL BE YOUR
OWN ELECTION ON BEHALF OF CIVILIZATION FOR THE
GREATER GOOD OF ALL LIVING CREATURES ON THIS
SPACESHIP, EARTH? RESPONSE: I just wonder, to be a bit
kind to the reader!
Then, besides learning, one also becomes aware that must (a)
get more and more prepared through the approach of
omniscience (a bold effort to be made for good), and (b) that, in
getting really prepared, his / her contingency planning will never
be farfetched and/or too-farsighted in THESE TIMES OF THE
‘EVER-INCREASINGLY’ UNTHINKABLE ONES. THE
UNTHINKABLE ONES WILL GET INCREASINGLY MORE AND
MORE UNTHINKABLE. LET’S PAUSE THE GIRLIE CRY, GET
PREPARED FOR AND USED TO THE WORSE. THE BRIGHT
SIDE WILL ILLUMINATE A NEWLY-NASCENT ILLUSTRATION
EON!
Yes, if you do the right things and you establish a relationship with
an expert in the subject, an expert that is not a “snake oil” seller,
but a consummated professional. He will co-manage – prior to
you authorization – many unthinkable facets to cripple the
violations against company’s policy, morality, integrity, and ethics.
Unfortunately, nearly the totality of psychometric tests won’t
render you the most covert and destructive case in due
(opportune) time. TAIRM engages into a huge depth of
understanding the personal cosmology of your firm’s personnel.
All of this for a fraction of insurance premium program. The
insurance company – as if we were speaking of mechanics – has
“bearings” that only rotate within and through financial systems.
TAIRM is highly sophisticated management brought to the field of
action with the applied omniscience perspective among many
other provisions. In fact, if insurance and reinsurance companies
used TAIRM, they would be obliged to reduce immensely any
premium rate. There is a great deal of cholesterol, greed, and red
tape in most of said companies. THIS IS THE REAL DEAL!
In less than 45 days, over 400 lives were lost because the “flying
submarines” could not navigate “with an even keel” the sea
waters. 400 lives are dead because of systemic and systematic
and ever-increasingly universal corruption. The latter equates
that, because of lack of Risk Management Implementation, those
innocents lives were lost.
I do write, tweet, and author works reminding people that when a
4-year old child gets his candy stolen by an adult instituting a
Bismarck’s stratagem, the worldwide human race is going back to
the cavemen times. I am concerned about it. I insist that this is the
gravest global crisis of Earth. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO
INSURE THAT PEOPLE DEALING WITH THE FINANCIAL,
ECOLOGICAL, ENERGY CRISES DO THE RIGHT THING IF
THEIR HONESTY HAS BEEN TAKEN FOR GRANTED? I am
seeing too much mediocrity. Many people have gone to the
greatest universities and from their best up-bringings but they are
determined to do things in evil and in error. Bertrand Russell
stated: “I know more people who prefer to die than to think.”
Corruption is, too, the ultimate crown jewel of Mediocrity Dom.
He said: “Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friends
and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation
of Americans – born in this century [Twentieth Century], tempered
by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our
ancient heritage – and unwilling to witness or permit the slow
undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always
been committed, and to which we are committed today at home
and around the world. Let every nation know, whether it wishes us
well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any
hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the
survival and the success of liberty.”
Isn’t that great? Yet, Isn’t that valid as per this eons-streaming
age? Isn’t this the precise personification of an actionable
statesman? To be a true statesman you must first be a leader.
The maintenance gentleman spoke about it before, that is, a
statesman both leading and following within his / her frame of
reference.
I did speak a bit about the ego issues. To tell you my way, I prefer
a great deal of ego than a great deal of low self-esteem. If the ego
is sick, it should be institutionalized. This discussion is flying into
loosing the sense of the ridicule. It reminds me of those byzantine
deliberations regarding the genders of the Angels.
One must make the effort to get the closet possible to applicable,
applicable omniscience in the day-to-day battlefield. The reader is
fully entitled to make his / her own conclusion. It takes hard work
in extremis and a for-Life tsunami of determination to somewhat
embrace the practicality of this crucial concept.
INTRODUCTION
Mostly, this work addresses some deep and yet wise reflections
by Wernher von Braun and Napoleon Bonaparte. Both proved to
be great leaders in their respective areas of dominion. Taking
both considerations seriously will be extremely interesting and
productive.
Sir Francis Bacon: "No term of moderation takes place with the
vulgar (the highly educated ignoramus who worships supine
ignorance that is paralyzed in a world that - very much to his / her
taste - has been caught strategically off-guard for the past 12
years. Now he is frustrated and yet in a free fall)."
TO VIEW THE LEADERSHIP SUCCESS TENETS BY ©
COPYRIGHT 2009 ANDRES AGOSTINI (ANDY), PLEASE LOG
ON TO
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-2399821
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1610862
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/definition-of-tranformativ
e-and-integrative-risk-management-authored-by-copyright-2005-a
ndres-agostini-andy-arlington-virginia-usa
None of those are the leaders who I and we care for in our
researching towards management and business. We do respect
their personas though. Many of the mentioned people get their
proximity to Applied State Of the Art with no basis, speculating
from superficiality, and, in my opinion, making many mistakes that
I will not enumerate now.
AS FOLLOWS:
2.- You are not capable of being a Milleniium-3 leader if you not
exude and electrify hope. Furthermore, Napoleonic cosmosvision
must be espoused to said hope.
1. INNER-MOST SIGHT
2. INSTINCTIVE SIGHT
3. THEORETICAL SIGHT
4. FAR-SIGHT
6. CONTEMPLATIVE SIGHT
7. INTROSPECTIVE SIGHT
8. EXTROSPECTIVE SIGHT
9. COUNTER-INTUITIVE SIGHT
# 19 – Creates and applies his / her own – along with that of the
team – body of knowledge.
# 48 – Short-circuits to shortcut.
# 65 – This Leader does not have only a passion, but he / she has
an extremely well passion that does not allow said person to lose
composure, aim, an strategic blueprint to shock and awe, via
overbearing number of angles, the adversary to be turned in
defeat by the collective unleashing of energy unload on to them
for the ultimate domination.
# 66 – Establishes a great human-to-‘computational power’
intelligence close-loop feedback via artificial intelligence to access
to and swiftly operate on the numerical and narrative data
received between the terrain sustained gains and the ultimate
goal to be captured within maximum control.
# 100 – This Leader is afraid neither the future nor the past but
make a mark on the moment.
# 102 – This Leader does not look through the mirror but every
window.
# 103 – This Leader build bridges between failures and
sustainable successes.
# 105 – The only stasis this Leader knows is the order tendered
by chaotic measures that institute and restore harmony.
# 107 – This Leader generates a lot of ideas and plans; looks for
good ideas, not just his / her own but those of the crew.
# 112 – This Leader takes care of his / her co-leader and look
after him / her in detail.
# 119 – For this Leader the bottomline is: The real objective of
having a LEADERSHIP is to provide for desired relevant
outcomes. For this Leader preparation is not only based on the
organization of the LEADERSHIP TEAM but the indispensability
of said organization is, by far, much more all-encompassing and
strategically decisive.
# 121 – This Leader knows that “quiet” historic times around the
world offer some type of “acceptable” bureaucratic environment.
This Leader also knows that he / she must turn the environment
fluidly “lean and mean,” especially when every facet of the world
order is by each 24 hours disrupting every historic precedent
known.
# 125 – This Leader knows that not only speed assures its
success, but order, cohesion, congruency, maneuvering, and the
effective use of resources.
It’s okay to break the rules in the right way. Going around doing
randomly disconnected things. Develop all the peripheral
relationships you need to be effective organizationally. Manage
the connections rather than the structure. Also know how to
hybridize.
Seed, select, amplify, and destabilize the situation are the two
management ideas for accelerated evolution. Don’t expect a
perfect feedback system in a volatile environment. Don’t be
excellent at doing; be excellent at changing, too.
Have a free flow of resources to where the value is. Rather than
penalizing people who fail, praise them for their commitment and
intentions. Reinforce the tolerance of risk and failure. Revise your
best practices. Observe, orient, decide, act. First to fight now
means first to learn.
Fly great distances, meet new people, and encounter new ideas.
Have a freedom of thought, the passion for experimentation, and
the desire to imagine your future. Believe in not commonly
believed opinions.
It’s about getting more from less. That’s the true road to wealth.
Focus on changes, challenges, and opportunities. Earn more
while spending less. Reach a higher level of output. Pursue profit
maximization. Remain competitive. Adapt to revolutionary
innovations in technology and business efficiency the soonest.
Craft value creating relationships. Establish guidelines, offer
insight, and provide inspiration. Identify, analyze, and maximize
your learning opportunities.
De-peril your risks. Empower your financial risks to work for you.
Hire them; get resigned from your bricks-and-mortars (a future not
plausible).
Have fewer staff and run a lean operation. Favor those who
leverage third-party relationships that don’t tie up capital and
consume resources.
It is so revealing the quotation that the reader can make his / her
own conclusion readily. In my case, I made extremely brief notes
when they are called for and viable. But when things are very
complex, I will examine thoroughly every single detail (and
granularity of detail) and transfer my conclusions to whatever
length of document as long as the document remains relevant to
the designated undertaking.
SCIENTIFIC NORMALNESS
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1610862
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/definition-of-tranformativ
e-and-integrative-risk-management-authored-by-copyright-2005-a
ndres-agostini-andy-arlington-virginia-usa
W*E*L*C*O*M*E
(__Välkomnande____welkomst____VÄLKOMSTHÄLSNING____
Welkom____радушный прием____歓迎___欢迎光临_____)
PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THAT I'M GOOD AT! People don’t know
that I’m extremely good at-with the Omniscience
perspective-seeing existential problems/fixes way in advance and
decisively, and Solving extremely complex difficulties that require
maximum precision...
MY TED STORY! I’ve had and still have the pleasure to be hired
by clients and operate with partners before the most daring and
pressing situations. Fortunately, educated in the USA, Canada,
and Great Britain in academia and profession I have a unique way
of seeing problems and their solving. Luckily and very much to my
advantage, I have worked in many tenures and for a whole array
of disparate industries. That’s why I feel quite comfortable in
dealing with a gamut of business issues, including some
undertaken by some supranational organizations as the World
Bank and special agencies like NASA. I am always ready to take
on an even more stringent challenge every time. I don’t only do a
great deal of researching, experimenting/testing. But I, too, do
huge studying and studying falsifying to walk several steps
forward towards the optimum omniscience repository applicable
by me and with others. I can go from huge structuralism to highly
amorphous and a combination of those two without losing
consistency, congruency, and efficacy.
5.-IMPORTANT RESOURCES at
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini
http://bigthink.com/wwwagostiniworksblogspotcom/
http://www.docstoc.com/profile/omnisciczar
http://www.ted.com/profiles/view/id/231424
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/omega-evaluates-andre
s-agostinis-traits
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22andres+agostini%22&hl
=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2001&as_sdtp=on
(*)
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/definition-of-transformati
ve-and-integrative-risk-management-authored-by-copyright-2005-
andres-agostini-andy-arlington-virginia-usa
(**) http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-2094865
ANDRES AGOSTINI
CONCLUSION
ANDRES AGOSTINI
INCIDENTALLY
The transformative and integrative approach of instructing risk
management* with the omniscience perspective** must be a
dynamical womb-to-tomb scrutinizing vista.
*http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/definition-of-tranformati
ve-and-integrative-risk-management-authored-by-copyright-2005-
andres-agostini-andy-arlington-virginia-usa
**http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-2094865
MY REPUTATION HERE:
http://www.yasni.com/index.php?action=webprofile&update_actio
n=&logout=1&name=Andres+Agostini&lgn=1&number=216333
"OUT-OF-THE-BOX" PONDERING AT
http://www.slideshare.net/AndresAgostini/1-1727457
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-2069287
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1968675
Evidence # 1 —
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22andres+agostini%2
2&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
Evidence # 2 —
http://www.altavista.com/web/results?itag=ody&q=%22andres+ag
ostini%22&kgs=1&kls=0
Evidence # 3 —
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%22andres+agostini%22&fr=y
fp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8
Evidence # 4 —
http://www.bing.com/search?q=%22andres+agostini%22&form=Q
BLH
Evidence # 5 —
http://search.aol.com/aol/search?s_it=comsearch40&query=%22a
ndres+agostini%22&do=Search
Evidence # 6 —
http://www.yasni.co.uk/index.php?action=webprofile&update_acti
on=&name=Andres+Agostini&number=216333&lgn=1
Evidence # 7 — http://www.agostiniworks.blogspot.com/
Evidence # 8 —
http://www.ecademy.com/account.php?id=408933
Evidence # 9 —
http://www.plaxo.com/profile/show/201864946128?pk=eb63a0e5
59a41173228e17d05901b55499b0098d
Evidence # 10 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1600561
Evidence # 11 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1600705
Evidence # 12 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1601098
Evidence # 13 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1610708
Evidence # 14 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1610719
Evidence # 15 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1610739
Evidence # 16 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1610752
Evidence # 17 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-2069287
Evidence # 18 —
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-2172648
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1616736
TRUSTWORTHINESS - www.truthworthy.blogspot.com
CLARITY, CLARITY, CLARITY AND MY SHARED BUSINESS
WITH SOCRATES!: "It has been my fixed principle to speak the
truth [because to my own self and to others not to speak the truth
— however shocking — is the greatest act of mediocrity, that
mediocrity (in corruption cloths) that is becoming the largest and
leading global crisis of all]E"
DELPHI, Andy has not ever sought the advice of the Oracle at
Delphi and he will never be apologetic about it.
"Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing wonder and
awe, the more often and the more seriously reflection
concentrates upon them: the starry heaven above me and the
moral law within me E Nothing in the world - indeed nothing even
beyond the world - can possibly be conceived which could be
called good without qualification except a GOOD WILL E I am
never to act otherwise than so that I could also will that my maxim
should become a UNIVERSAL LAW E Finally, there is an
imperative which commands a certain conduct immediately,
without having as its condition any other purpose to be attained
by it. This imperative is CATEGORICAL E This imperative may
be called that of MORALITYE" (Immanuel Kant) — "EI teach
you the superman. Man is something to be surpassed E [Man
found a solitary existence tedious.] There are no limits to God's
compassion with Paradises over their one universally felt want: he
immediately created other animals besides. God's first blunder:
Man didn't find the animals amusing, — he dominated them, and
didn't even want to be an 'animal'E What I understand by
'philosopher': a terrible explosive in the presence of which
everything is in danger E Morality is the herd-instinct in the
individual E He who fights with monsters might take care lest he
thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an
abyss, the abyss gazes also into you E Master-morality and
slave-morality E Wit is the epitaph of an emotion E At the base
of all these aristocratic races the predator is not to be mistaken,
the splendorous blond beast, avidly rampant for plunder and
victory E" (Friedrich Nietzsche) — "If I have see further it is by
standing on the shoulders of giants E Philosophy is such an
impertinently litigious lady that a man has as good be engaged in
law suits as have to do with her E Whence is it that Nature does
nothing in vain: and whence arises all that order and beauty which
we see in the world? E does it not appear from phenomena that
there is a Being incorporeal, living, intelligent, omnipresent, who
in infinite space, as it were in his Sensory, sees the things
themselves intimately, and thoroughly perceives them, and
comprehends them wholly E" (Sir Isaac Newton) — "For all
knowledge and wonder (which is the seed of knowledge) is an
impression of pleasure in itself E So let great authors have their
due, as time, which is the author of authors, be not deprived of his
due, which is further and further to discover truth E If a man will
begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts; but if he will be
content to begin with doubts, he shall end in certainties E
[Knowledge is] a rich storehouse for the glory of the Creator and
the relief of man's estate E (Sir Francis Bacon) —
THE REAL DEAL! -Andy: "Once you do your ethics, you can do
your actionable knowledge. Once your actionable knowledge is
done by you, you can do you future. When your future is done by
you, you can do your risks. When risks are done by you, you can
do your benefits."
ANDY ON WWW.BLOGTALKRADIO.COM at
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/OmniSciCzar
http://optimumleader.blogspot.com/
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1582968
POSTINGS ON ECADEMY
http://www.slideshare.net/andresagostini/1-1572445
MY BUSINESS CARD
http://www.slideshare.net/main/list?login=andresagostini&type=us
er
***********************
CONTENTS:
**********************
1.-KEY QUOTATIONS!
2.-WHO IS HE?
3.-PROVOKING THOUGHT 1
4.-PROVOKING THOUGHT 2
6.-PROVOKING THOUGHT 3
11.-WHO IS RESPECTED?
21.-NASA ON ANDY AT
25.-ANDY AT ECADEMY
26.-ANDY AT PLAXO
31.-ANDY AT LINKEDIN
51.-NASA ON "UFOs"
53.-WHO IS WHO?
63.-I'M A MANDARIN!
KEY QUOTATIONS!
Goethe , "If everyone would just sweep their own front porch,
the whole world would be clean."
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/6451829/Andres-Agostini_ANDY'S-
BROCHURE