The lesson I found to be most engaging was the topic of water guided by the ideology of Social Reconstruction. I believe that the activities associated with Learner-Centered and Social Reconstruction lessons were well received because of how they engaged the class.
The lesson I found to be most engaging was the topic of water guided by the ideology of Social Reconstruction. I believe that the activities associated with Learner-Centered and Social Reconstruction lessons were well received because of how they engaged the class.
The lesson I found to be most engaging was the topic of water guided by the ideology of Social Reconstruction. I believe that the activities associated with Learner-Centered and Social Reconstruction lessons were well received because of how they engaged the class.
1/ What lesson did you find most engaging? Explain why. How might this be informed by the ideology that guided the lesson? The lesson I found to be most engaging was the topic of water guided by the ideology of social reconstruction. This group really highlighted the inequities between countries and their ability to obtain safe drinking water. They submerged the class in the actual problem by devising an activity that provided a visual representation of how under privileged some countries are. The activity also allowed for problem solving. Ok if Canada has an extra bottle of water then why not give it to India because you can actually see their lack of the resource. The conclusion of the lesson was strong as well because they provided links to site that provide relief to those countries that are actually suffering from this particular inequity. 2/ What was the impact of the ideologies on the objectives identified? I think the objective of each lesson reflected the ideology that was represented. The impact of the ideology and be seen the through the word choices each group made. Social Reconstruction saw words such as understand, awareness, and participate which would be included in the steps of solving and inequity. Social Efficiency used words like duplicate, experience and appreciate. These words reflect the need to fill jobs in society. Some actions that the groups took also reflected their ideology. The Water Academic Scholar group mentioned that they had to keep revising their lesson because it was too fun and they wanted their focus to be on the knowledge being handed down. Opposite to that was the Water Learner-centered group who actually left room for student involvement in choosing the categories that water might be apply to. 3/ What ideology did you find to be the most impactful or meaningful on the teaching/ learning that took place? Explain why. How does it compare with the results obtained from your curriculum inventory? I believe that the activities associated with Learner-Centered and Social Reconstruction lessons were well received because of how they engaged the class. They allowed for us, the students, to develop our own means, uses and solutions to the questions and problems posed. In comparison to my curriculum inventory it was right on mark. However, I also want to mention the Academic Scholars because although it seems the becoming obsolete it is the one ideology that students of my generation are more accustomed to and possibly more comfortable with just because of our past experiences. 4/ Overall how do you think curriculum ideology will impact your role and practice as a teacher? I think every teacher enters their role of educator with a specific goal in mind whether that goal is to provide lessons that are primarily lead by students or to become that teacher that delivers every lesson through direct instruction. I think I will fall somewhere in the middle of these two examples but I also believe that the content of each lesson will help influence which ideology I choose to embrace. As well, each school is going to have its own set of beliefs that may ultimately influence which ideology I will use.