Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Abstract
Do probiotics prevent and/or treat antibiotic associated diarrhea in patients? Many patients stop
the antibiotic they are on to prevent them from getting diarrhea, which is a common side effect of
antibiotics. Health care providers recommend that patients take probiotics to help treat and/or
prevent antibiotic associated diarrhea from occurring. A systematic review was conducted to
evaluate if probiotics are an effective use of prevention and/or treatment to antibiotic associated
diarrhea. Two independent reviewers evaluated 82 randomized controlled trials from 12
different electronic database searches. Through this evidence based research, it is suggested that
probiotics is an effective way to treat and/or prevent antibiotic associated diarrhea from
occurring but there needs to be more studies conducted to find which strains of probiotics work
the best.
symptomatology, which type of probiotic intervention used, if probiotic was given alongside
antibiotic, and any forms of diarrhea reported.
Second, the publications were reviewed and assessed by two independent reviewers.
Two independent reviewers extracted trial details pertaining to the participants, antibiotics and
probiotics interventions and comparators, and results regarding diarrhea, using a standardized
form. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion (Hempel, 2012). Even though the main
outcome being looked at was the number of participants with diarrhea in each treatment group,
the reviewers also looked for similar outcomes like severity and consistency of the stool. After
the trials were chosen, they were put through a bias test and combined into a random-effects
meta-analysis to calculate any risk. Finally, the trails remaining trials were reviewed and the
results of the trials were combined and put into a systematic review.
Results
After all the trials were reviewed and assessed, 82 RCTs met the final criteria. The
review found that Lactobacillus was the probiotic that was used in majority. The lactobacillus
was either used alone or in combination with other genera but the strains was poorly
documented. Though, 63 of the RCTs found that there was a significant association of probiotic
administration with reduction in AAD (Hempel, 2012). The study concluded that probiotics are
related to a decrease in AAD but there needs to be more research conducted in order to
determine which probiotics provide the maximal efficacy and which probiotics work best with
which antibiotics.
Limitations
This study has very minimal limitations, if any due, to the fact that it is a systematic
review and meta-analysis (which is the highest form of research conducted) and limitations are
eliminated during the review process.
We applied the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assess sequence generation;
allocation concealment; participant, personnel, and outcome assessor blinding;
attrition bias; incomplete outcome data; selective outcome reporting; and other
sources of bias.12 In addition, we assessed the reporting and ascertainment of
included strains, the statistical power, and the funding and potential for conflict of
interest associated with individual trials (Hempel, 2012).
The trials were also put into a random-effects meta-analysis which calculated the relative risk.
The analysis also looked for any sensitivity and did a subgroup analysis.
Population difference
Since this is a systematic review, it looks at multiple independent studies that have a wide
variety in the population sample. The results are the same for every age, gender and ethnicity.
When it comes to nursing care for patients with diarrhea from an antibiotic it is still
recommended to give a probiotic to help prevent and treat the AAD. A nurse can give a patient
food that provides probiotics, such as yogurt, to help with the diarrhea or the nurse can
administer probiotics in medication from, as long as there is an order to any type of population.
There is no comparison in populations when it comes to a nurse giving probiotics to treat AAD.
Plan of Care
The primary problem in the study is diarrhea. Even though it is looking specifically
looking at AAD and how effective probiotics are at preventing and treating AAD. There are
three main nursing diagnoses for diarrhea: 1) diarrhea, 2) deficient fluid volume and 3) risk for
electrolyte imbalance.
The first nursing diagnosis is diarrhea r/t medication adverse effect. A patient outcome
would be to defecate formed, soft stool every one to three days. One nursing intervention would
be to consult the physician to get an order to give probiotics and/or fiber. After order is given,
administer the probiotic and/or fiber to the patient. Another nursing intervention would be to
monitor and assess the patients stool after every bowel movement, using a hat that is placed in
the toilet, to see any change in stool form and consistency.
The second nursing diagnosis is deficient fluid volume r/t excessive loss of fluids from
liquid stools. A patient outcome would be to maintain a urine output of 0.5 mL/kg/hour. One
nursing intervention would be to monitor fluid intake and output every four hours. Another
nursing intervention would be to get an order for an isotonic IV solution from the physician and
administer it to the patient once ordered or have the patient drink a minimum of six to eight eight
ounce glasses of water.
The third nursing diagnosis is risk for electrolyte imbalance. A patient outcome would be
to maintain normal serum potassium, sodium, calcium, phosphorus and pH levels. One nursing
intervention would be to monitor and evaluate laboratory data and report any deviations to the
physician. Another nursing diagnosis would be to get an order for electrolyte replacement
medication if any laboratory data is lower than a normal range and administer those medications
once order is given.
References
Hempel, S., Newberry, S. J., Maher, A. R., Wang, Z., V. Miles, J. N., Shanman, R., & Johnson,
B. (2012, May 9). Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic associated
diarrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of the American Medical
Association, 307(18), 1959-1969. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.3507.
Below Expectations
7
Needs Improvement
Meets Expectations
(0-3 points)
(3-17 points)
(18-20 points)
(0-3 points)
(3-17 points)
(18-20 points)
(1-2 points)
(3-7 points)
(8-10 points)
Identifies limitations of
study.
(1-2 points)
(3-7 points)
(8-10 points)
(1-2 points)
(3-7 points)
(8-10 points)
Demonstrates satisfactory
critical thinking when
comparing nursing care with
another population.
(1-2 points)
(3-7 points)
(8-10 points)
Accurately identifies 1
nursing diagnosis with
outcome criteria and
interventions for nursing
care problem addressed in
study.
Reflects on relevance of
study to actual nursing
practice.
(1-2 points)
(3-7 points)
(8-10 points)
Either relevance or
correlation to nursing
practice weak.
(1-2 points)
(3-7 points)
(8-10 points)