Master of Teaching (P-12) SCHOOL OF EDUCATION MASTER OF TEACHING (P-12) TEACHING PRACTICE EVALUATION EDUSTEA — TEACHING PRACTICE A For use by Supervising Teachers and by LTU Supervisors | NAME OE ETpENT [Ama Louse Young [DATES OF PLACEMENT aor 3a Ayr [3 —! F (Vile fl 20 AaAJS 4 | NUMBER OF DAYS ‘COMPLETED [Sctoou/srTe Heywood District Sconces | YEAR LEVELS Year /] VAL SUPERVISING TEACHERS NAME | Vy De yey SePNENS Please MARK “K” at the appropriate gradingis) in each section of this form, and comment according to your evaluation of the student’s performance relative to this stage of the course and against the National Standards for Graduate Teachers. ‘The seven National Standards for Graduate Teachers group the professional work of teachers into three categories: professional knowledge, professional practice and professional engagement. This evaluation form adopts that structure. Supervising teachers are asked to use the scales provided to indicate their evaluation of the student's demonstrated performance in each of the seven areas, using the scale provided. The scale categories should be interpreted as follows: Outstanding (equivalent to a mark in the range 80% ~ 100%) Demonstrated performance at 2 level of excellence markedly above the standard expected at this stage of the course in all relevant areas Very Good (equivalent to a mark in the range 70% - 79%) Demonstrated performance at 2 level cleatly above the standard expected at this stage of the course in all relevant areas Goad (equivalent to a markin the range 60% - 69%) A level of performance deemed satisfactory and equivalent to the standard expected at this stage in the course overall, and of a higher standard in some aspects Fair (equivalent to 2 merk in the range 50% -59%) A level of performance deemed satisfactory and equivalent to the standard expected at this stage in the course Unsatisfactory (equivalent to a mark in the range 0% - 49%) ‘A level of performance deemed below the standard expected at this stage in the course 16Master of Teaching (P-12) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE Unsatistactory Far Good Very Good | Outstanding Standard 1 Knows students and how they learn ‘Standard 2 Knows the content and how to teach it ‘Comments on professional knowledge, relative to this stage in the course Frey Way veg well prepared fer the vat of Wowk bared en tle fle The Breakfast Mey She demon shaved an excellant Kuewledge of Content arc slomes , Amy used formative assessment tqsks te ascevtain de abilily of 4a stident ant how hay leas wt 7Master of Teaching (P-12) PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Unsatisfactory Fair Good Very Good _| Outstanding Standard 3 Plans for and implement effective teaching and vv learning Standard 4 Create and maintain supportive and safe v learning enviconments Standard 5 Assesses and provides feedback and reports on 4% student learning Comments on professional practice, relative to this stage in the course Her wovk wes cutstading amd she received Goethe Siashe weaporses fo all af ths ach oites she yen. / She gave posite ead back 1m a timely foshior fo +e stude tel at He Saud ture challegeo Ao a weul she sei up a ven) posit se CavivonmaA drat war inclesive ancl Phcowoge leavnitg doth de hugh ach €v2eS Qo she mene rotiue sha deh - 18‘Master of Teaching (P-12) PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT Unsatisfactory Fair Good very Good | Outstanding Standard 6 Engages in professional - learning Standard 7 Y Engages professionally with colleagues, parents/carers and the community Comments on professional engagement, relative to this stage in the course I was ew wa pes sed uty fs Prele ssional Ongar gamed mtd? He classresnn Un ings blew Wetfere ard engagencrt masta) s aewall GENERAL COMMENTS and RECOMMENDATIONS General comments and overall evaluation 19Master of Teaching (P-12) Relative to this stage in the Course, strong performance was demonstrated in Relative to this stage in the course, particular attention is necessary in To best promote this pre-service teacher's development, I/we recommend... DATE ‘SUPERVISING TEACHERS) ‘The final markis calculated by 46-15 | (SIGNATURE/S)...e- LTU staff asa percentage DATE ‘SITE COORDINAT: based on the report of the supervising teacher 6 15 | (signature)... 5 DATE PRE-SERVICE TE Fb -15| wionatune, mF]. E 20