Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Table 1
Characteristics of ESL Students
Characteristics
Descriptions
Age
Ranges from 18 to 26
Education level
Mostly high school degree from home country. The rest of them
hold bachelors degree from home country in science, business,
Native languages
Computer skills
Advanced
Proficiency levels
Values
Most of my values of teaching ESL are more aligned with constructivism whilst some of
them fall under the cognitivism continuum. The values reflected in this evaluation
implementation are:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Offers interactiveness
Provides authentic materials
Scaffolds construction of knowledge
Provides repetition of knowledge in various context genres
Connects the content and real-world environment schematically
Provides opportunities for collaboration
Uses diverse perspectives to present knowledge to learners
Websites like Activities for ESL Students, Daves ESL caf, ESL Partyland were chosen
for the evaluation because they provide enormous amount of learning materials as well as
activities that cover from beginning level to advanced level. Spritz and Many Things are not
specifically designed for ESL/EFL learning, but they both can facilitate students learning since
they are related to reading skills. Oxford Picture Dictionary, English with Jennifer, and Flash
Card Exchange provide students with a good amount of graphics such as pictures, PowerPoint,
flashcards, and videos. They are applicable for most proficiency levels.
Checklist Function and Revisions
The first draft of this evaluation checklist has about only half of the criteria of the final
draft. For example, after adding the multimedia tools criterion, and the setting and
interoperability criterion, I felt that it became more functional. I did not include criteria like
objectivity because almost none of the website or programs that I evaluated had apparent conflict
such as advertising by the sponsor or was biased in their content. Then in the next revision, I
added more specific objectives under each category in order to more thoroughly examine the
website and software chosen for this project. However, after the implementation of the
evaluation checklist, I think more categories of criteria should have been considered in the
checklist, such as assessment, readability, and so on.
While I was evaluating the websites and programs, I find that I left too little space for the
comments column that some of my comments are condensed and the limited space influenced
the readability of my handwriting, too. I also felt like that it would have been better if I added a
criteria to evaluate the coverage of the contents, such as what topics are included, and the depth
of exploration of the knowledge, etc. I would like to add a category to evaluate the currency of
the materials, if possible. In that case, it will be more convenient when it comes to making
decisions of which material should be used since the checklist would provide more reference
under those categories.
Appendix 1
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Checklist
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
B
A
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
Comments
world application
Technical matter
Purpose
Language
B
A
B
A
A
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
Scaffolds the content from easy to difficult
B
C
Very userfriendly
Contents are
learning potential
arranged by
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
A
Provides opportunity to practice over varying A
topics rather
genres
Feedback
Learner fit
Interactivity
Multimedia tools
Settings and
interoperability
scaffolding
structure
B
C
B
answers
Provides extra learning resources
Language skills are targeted by the software
Program allows for varying activities to
B
C
A
than by
More focused
on reading
and writing
B
B
B
B
B
C
A
A
A
B
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Conclusion:
OPD CD-ROM can be easily adapted to ESL teachers curricula because of its content
covers a wide range of topics and provides various activities. It allows collaboration but does not
provided many opportunities for students to communicate.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Checklist
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Comments
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Not ESL/EFL
focused
software so it
does not
Technical matter
Purpose
Language
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
Directions are clear
Loading speed is fast
Easy to access targeted section or re-access
A
A
B
B
A
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
Scaffolds the content from easy to difficult
Includes both schematic context and
B
D
D
provide
learning
material
Improves
learners
reading speed
learning potential
Feedback
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
A
Provides opportunity to practice over varying D
genres
Evaluates accuracy of learners answers
Accepts alternative answers
Provides explanations for correct or incorrect
D
D
D
Provides
answers
Provides extra learning resources
within the
extra reading
websites
program
Learner fit
Teacher fit
Interactivity
C
C
C
B
B
D
D
D
B
A
C
B
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
More
appropriate
for individual
use
Multimedia tools
Settings and
interoperability
Conclusion:
Spritz was not specifically developed for ESL/EFL learning, therefore, it has its
limitations when it is employed in classroom. It could be used to help students who have
difficulties reading on screens and improve their reading speed.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Criteria
Critique
Comments
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
B
A
AWL,
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
Directions are clear
Loading speed is fast
Easy to access targeted section or re-access
A
A
B
A
B
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
Technical matter
Purpose
campus slang
and idioms
are included
Objectives of
activities are
clear.
Learners can
target at what
they need
Language
learning potential
A
B
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
B
Provides opportunity to practice over varying B
genres
Feedback
Learner fit
B
C
C
No
answers
Provides extra learning resources
Language skills are targeted by the software
Program allows for varying activities to
B
B
B
answers
Writing skills
explanation
given for
are not
included
A
B
B
B
C
C
Communicati
on section is
not included
in this
program
Multimedia tools
Settings and
interoperability
A
A
A
A
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Conclusion:
This software provides various practice of the knowledge with different context, which
promotes the repetition but does not wear away learners interest. Teachers who are not
confident with their pronunciation skills can use this as a supplement.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Checklist
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
A
A
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
Directions are clear
Loading speed is fast
Easy to access targeted section or re-access
B
A
B
Navigation is
to get re-
Technical matter
Comments
not clear
enough. Hard
access
quickly
Purpose
Language
learning potential
A
A
objectives
Objectives are clear
Scaffolds the content from easy to difficult
Includes both schematic context and
A
B
B
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
A
Provides opportunity to practice over varying A
genres
Closely
related to
real-world
situations
Feedback
Learner fit
Teacher fit
Interactivity
B
B
A
The forum
answers
Provides extra learning resources
Language skills are targeted by the software
Program allows for varying activities to
A
A
B
for Q&A
B
C
Not course-
B
B
B
B
provides
opportunities
specific
Needs a bit
task-editing
work from
the teacher to
fit the class
Multimedia tools
Settings and
interoperability
B
A
B
B
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Conclusion:
This website provides an enormous amount of ESL related materials ranging from
linguistic knowledge to job searching information. Teachers should carefully choose the
appropriate content that meets the requirements of their classes.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Comments
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
A
A
All materials
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
Technical matter
Purpose
Language
learning potential
and examined
by native
speakers
A
A
B
B
B
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
Scaffolds the content from easy to difficult
Includes both schematic context and
B
B
A
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
B
Provides opportunity to practice over varying A
Feedback
are provided
genres
Evaluates accuracy of learners answers
Accepts alternative answers
Provides explanations for correct or incorrect
B
B
B
answers
Provides extra learning resources
Not coursespecific
Learner fit
Teacher fit
Interactivity
B
B
C
C
B
C
B
C
A
A
B
C
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Contents need
to be adapted
to fit the class
More focused
on input
rather than
output
Multimedia tools
Settings and
interoperability
Conclusion:
Many Things is a great after-class learning resource since it provides not only reading
materials, but also the games and quizzes that allow students to enhance their retention.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Activities for ESL Students is a website that holds tests, activities and other learning
materials for ESL learners. It also provides bilingual quizzes in a wide range of languages to
English.
Checklist
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Comments
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
B
B
Some
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
Directions are clear
Loading speed is fast
Easy to access targeted section or re-access
A
A
B
B
B
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
Technical matter
Purpose
Language
learning potential
B
B
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
B
Provides opportunity to practice over varying A
material looks
outdated
Contributed
by many
teachers so
objectives
might vary
Quizzes and
materials are
arranged by
their
difficulty
genres
levels
Feedback
Learner fit
B
B
B
answers
Provides extra learning resources
Language skills are targeted by the software
A
B
Mostly
focused on
reading and
writing skills
Teacher fit
Interactivity
Multimedia tools
B
C
B
C
B
B
C
B
B
C
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Boring layout
Very few
pictures or
videos
Settings and
interoperability
Conclusion:
This website provides a lot of interesting ESL/EFL activities and materials, but the layout and the design of the website is monotonous so that makes it harder to make better use of the
contents, or to further explore the website and the materials it offers.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Checklist
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Comments
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
A
A
Contents are
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
arranged by
topics.
Closely
related to the
real-world
Technical matter
Purpose
Language
learning potential
B
B
B
B
B
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
Scaffolds the content from easy to difficult
Includes both schematic context and
A
B
A
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
B
Provides opportunity to practice over varying A
Feedback
genres
Evaluates accuracy of learners answers
Accepts alternative answers
Provides explanations for correct or incorrect
B
C
B
Teachers and
answers
Provides extra learning resources
to each other
students can
give feedback
via the
website
Learner fit
Teacher fit
Interactivity
Multimedia tools
Settings and
interoperability
B
B
B
B
C
C
B
B
B
C
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Conclusion:
I think this website is more suitable for teachers to employ to help themselves plan the
lessons and to use it as a facilitation in the classroom because most of the materials given in the
website are for teaching. Students can use it for extra practice.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B(Good),
C(Poor), and D (Very poor).
Checklist
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Comments
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
A
A
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
Technical matter
Purpose
Language
learning potential
and the
knowledge
are applicable
A
A
A
B
B
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
recently made
B
A
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
A
Provides opportunity to practice over varying A
Connection
between
different
lessons are
not clear
Contents are
arranged in
two main
styles:
scaffolding,
genres
and by topics
Feedback
Learner fit
B
B
B
answers
Provides extra learning resources
Language skills are targeted by the software
Program allows for varying activities to
B
B
B
Speaking
skills need to
be more wellrepresented
Teacher fit
Interactivity
Multimedia tools
Settings and
B
B
A
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Hard to print
Conclusion:
This YouTube channel can be used in a flipped classroom. Teachers can let students
watch the videos at home and discuss their questions in class.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Checklist
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Comments
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
C
A
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
ESL-specific
so it does not
provide
learning
materials
Technical matter
Purpose
A
A
B
B
A
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
Learners or
teachers
design their
own cards
based on their
Language
learning potential
C
C
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
B
Provides opportunity to practice over varying C
own needs
These
features are
not presented
because it is
not ESL-
genres
specific
Feedback
C
C
C
answers
Provides extra learning resources
website
These
features are
not presented
because it is
not ESLspecific
website. But
users can
Learner fit
Teacher fit
Interactivity
B
C
C
C
B
C
B
C
browse
Students can
get motivated
while making
their cards
Multimedia tools
Settings and
interoperability
A
A
B
A
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Conclusion:
I would recommend students to use this website to create their own vocabulary flashcards
or design vocabulary games with their partners to increase opportunities for them to practice
their language skills in more different contexts.
This checklist should be used to examine whether CALL software/website is suitable for an
ESL/EFL class or could efficiently help improve learners performance. The software/sites
examined using the following criteria and will be rated on a scale from A (Very good), B (Good),
C (Poor), and D (Very poor).
Checklist
Domain
Criteria
Critique
Comments
Authenticity
Up-to-date materials
Language and materials used by the software
A
B
Some
is authentic
Connection between the materials and real-
world application
materials are
too examoriented. Not
highly
applicable
Technical matter
Purpose
Language
learning potential
A
A
A
A
A
B
objectives
Objectives are clear
Scaffolds the content from easy to difficult
Includes both schematic context and
B
B
A
linguistic knowledge
Limit the use of learners native language
A
Provides opportunity to practice over varying B
genres
Sample
practices are
simple and
easy to
follow, but
the actual
practices can
Feedback
Learner fit
Teacher fit
Interactivity
A
B
A
answers
Provides extra learning resources
Language skills are targeted by the software
Program allows for varying activities to
A
B
B
A
B
A
B
C
C
be very
Explanations
are in great
details
The practices
are engaging
but the
difficulty
level is not
highly
motivating
Multimedia tools
Settings and
interoperability
B
A
B
B
features)
Easiness to print off or copy materials
Conclusion:
The GMAT prep-kit is a bit expensive compared to the other websites/software evaluated
in this project. It only provides limited attempts for mocking exams, too. However, students can
gain critical thinking training and perfect their language skills through practicing with the
exercises and mocking exams with the kit.
Appendix 2
List of software and websites reviewed
Software/website name
Link or publisher
https://elt.oup.com/catalogue/items/global/dictionari
es/oxford_picture_dictionary/?
Spritz
cc=us&selLanguage=en&mode=hub
http://spritzinc.com/
http://www.englishtalkshopshop.com/store/America
Academic
Daves ESL Cafe
n-Speechsounds-for-Academics-P16.aspx
http://www.eslcafe.com/
Many Things
http://www.manythings.org/
http://a4esl.org/
ESL Partyland
https://www.eslpartyland.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/JenniferESL
http://www.cram.com/
GMAT Prep
http://www.mba.com/us