Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Paper:
yes
no
yes
no
List confounders described under Data extraction, characteristics of participants
Method used for controlling for confounding
At design stage:
matching
Variables on which subjects matched:
.
.
.
.
At analysis stage:
stratification
multivariable regression
propensity scores (matching)
propensity scores (multivariable regression)
List confounders controlled for under Data extraction, characteristics of
participants
Data extraction
Entire study
Number of participants identified
Number of participants:
excluded/
lost to follow-up
Number of participants included
All participants accounted for?
yes
no
Intervention
Control
Characteristics of participants
(enter characteristics, tick if considered to be a confounder [Confr?], then enter mean and SD, or
frequency and percentage for each characteristic, for entire study population and by group. Finally,
for each characteristic, tick last column to indicate whether groups were considered different
[Difft?] by the researchers.)
Characteristic
Confr?
Entire study
Exposed
Unexposed
Difft?
Age
Sex
Marital status
GP referral patterns
Others:
Effects of intervention
Outcome
and
intervention
All fractures
Number
analysed
Unadjusted
effect estimate
and CI / SE
HR OR RR
Number
analysed
Adjusted effect
estimate
and CI / SE
HR OR RR
Intervention
vs. control
SE
Lower
extremity
fractures
(all)
Intervention
vs. control
Lower
extremity
fractures
(women)
Intervention
vs. control
Lower
extremity
fractures
(men)
Intervention
vs. control
Hip fractures
(women)
Intervention
vs. control
CI
HR OR RR
SE
CI
HR OR RR
SE
CI
HR OR RR
SE
CI
HR OR RR
SE
CI
SE
CI
HR OR RR
SE
CI
HR OR RR
SE
CI
HR OR RR
SE
CI
HR OR RR
SE
CI
Confounders
included in
adjusted analysis