Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Scrutinizing biblical
statements in the name
of scholarship has
eroded confidence in the
effectiveness of personal
Bible study.
In fact, by focusing on the human aspects of the
Bible, weve clouded our awareness of the divine
nature of its words. Scrutinizing biblical
statements in the name of scholarship has eroded
confidence in the effectiveness of personal Bible
study.
Christians today have fallen into the trap of
equating church traditions and the words of
scholars with the Word of God. We accept these
rituals and pronouncements blindly, without even
so much as a glance at Scripture to see for
ourselves if what is being taught is lining up with
Gods word.
Suspicious Minds
Many churches have adopted unbiblical practices
and policies in the name of inclusion and keeping
the gospel relevant to the times. This has given
rise to many false teachers who are, bit by bit,
leading the church astray.
In his book Velvet Elvis, Rob Bell says:
This is part of the problem with continually
insisting that one of the absolutes of the Christian
faith must be a belief that Scripture alone is our
guide. It sounds nice, but it is not true. In reaction
to abuses by the church, a group of believers
during a time called the Reformation claimed that
we only need the authority of the Bible. But the
problem is that we got the Bible from the church
voting on what the Bible even is. So when I affirm
the Bible as Gods Word, in the same breath I
have to affirm the when those people voted, God
was somehow present, guiding them to do what
they did. When people say that all we need is the
Bible, it is simply not true (pp. 67-68).
Mr. Bells ideas about God and the Bible
demonstrate an extremely low view of the
sovereignty of God and an abnormally high view
of the power of man, two errors that continually
show up throughout his book.
The present books of the Bible are the right ones
because God made it so, not because of a vote
instituted by a group of men. As a result of Robs
God-removed, man-centered view of Scripture,
he teaches its powerlessness and encourages its
rejection.
Rob Bell has stated on more than one occasion
that we cannot consult a 2,000 year old text for
answers to todays queries and problems.
Doubting the authority of Gods word is
dangerous territory. I think Elvis said it best
Trending Now
Velvet Elvis is just one of many silver-tongued and
popular writings that have surfaced in an effort to
invalidate Scripture and mask the churchs
hypocrisy. They seek to undermine the Word of
God from one main standpoint: cultural
relevance.
As a country, we have taken great strides in the
area of womens rights and equality. From the first
official gathering devoted to womens suffrage in
July of 1848, to the graduation of the first female
Army Rangers in August 2015, we are well on the
path to eliminating the notion of gender-based
roles altogether.
In the wake of such seemingly beneficial and
commendable cultural developments, its no
wonder the church squirms at the idea of
teaching on the topics of marital submission,
gender roles, and the order of authority.
Shaken
Interpretation? Or Giving
Ground?
Our sophisticated and contextual interpretations
of Scripture have muddied the waters with
An understanding of
the culture of the time
will never negate the
truth of Scripture
Knowing when something was written, to whom,
and why is crucial when evaluating Scripture.
From this we are able to discern God's intended
meaning in the text. We can then draw out the
inspired truth within and yield to what it says.
An understanding of the culture of the time will
never negate the truth of Scripture; it will always
serve to illuminate its relevance for us today!
For example, an understanding of cultural
traditions is important for controversial verses like
1 Corinthians 11:310:
Now I want you to realize that the head of
every man is Christ, and the head of woman
is man, and the head of Christ is God. Every
Controversy is never an
excuse not to obey!
However, a study of Scripture reveals it was never
a direct command from God, nor was Moses
establishing a standard for worship when he wore
the veil. Paul also confronts this man-made
teaching in his second letter to the Corinthians (2
Cor. 3:1218).
So what does this passage mean? Does it hold
any relevance for us today? The answer is yes.
Though it may spark many a debate and stir up
emotions, controversy is never an excuse not to
obey! Let's take a look at Corinthian culture and
the context of the letter Paul wrote to the church.
Yellow Lines
When Paul says, "For man did not come from
woman, but woman from man; neither was man
created for woman but woman for man," he is
not making a value statement. He is not
instituting the superiority of men over women
he is highlighting God's divine order, established
from Creation.
Divine order and appropriate limitation is the
application in these verses. The limitation being
that women should not seek to look and act like
men, and men should not look or act like women.
The divine order being a relationship of
submission from the woman to the man.
The word "submit" creates great discomfort in
our society today due to many false perceptions
and abuses of the command. We must remember
that Jesus, being in very nature God, was
willingly, freely, and gladly submitted to the will of
the Father (Jn. 5:19). His model extends to his
Dead or Alive?
Attempts to interpret Scripture through the lens
of culture, in an effort to negate its truth and
application, renders its meaning lifeless.