shareholders and stakeholders in the modern corporation Dr Roger Barker
he invention of the joint stock limited
liability company was one of the great innovations of the nineteenth century. Despite suspicion and criticism over the years, the company has proved uniquely successful in harnessing human and financial resources in the undertaking of economic activity. In this article, we argue that shareholders distinctive role in its corporate governance should not be lightly jettisoned, although a significant new role is needed for other corporate stakeholders. The basic concept of a limited liability company is simple but ingenious. Shareholders invest in the enterprise but are not held liable for the companys debts (a wonderful means of encouraging investment). The companys existence is independent of the shareholders and shares can be sold. Nevertheless, shareholders retain significant power over the company and its objectives. They have the right to appoint and dismiss the directors and hold them to account for the success (or otherwise) of the company. Although in large public companies the company may be run by the CEO, ultimate shareholder power ensures that the companys activities remain aligned with shareholders.
Unfortunately, in many UK and US listed
corporations this idealised conception of governance with a clear chain of accountability from shareholders to boards and management has become distorted (although it lives on to a much greater extent in privately held enterprises). The growing complexity of modern corporations, and the fragmentation of listed company ownership across large numbers of shareholders, has effectively shifted power from shareholders towards executive management. In their ground-breaking study in the 1930s, Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means (1932) already recognised that a dispersed ownership structure worked in the interests of the CEO and key executives in the power structure of the company. This insight is ref lected in the lack of shareholder influence over widely held public, listed companies today. Institutional investors from the UK and overseas own a significant proportion of the UK equity market. But they lack the incentive to devote significant time and resources to governance due both to their small percentage ownership stakes and fear that competing investors would free ride on