dct
J
smd
ent
J
defined
J
a
went elt
Psychodynamic: Psychosexual
Seta soos
vi ntin ad
sagt
$
oatee se
weit
ae
Unconscious Preconscious Conscious
Mind
Repression Rationalization Projection Reaction Sut
Formation
Creativity
Psychodynamic Approach to Personality
“ M
extended by
ey
Cart al Karen Psychosocial Object Relations
sung ‘Ader
d 1
posited posited
Lv
General Life Need to Control
Force (One's Environment
4™
‘includes develops tendencies
boIN
Drives introversion Extravers
b
for
Productive
Oriented Blending of
Conflict Basic Impulses
Resolution with Real World
Demands
Growth
Oral Anal Phallic Latency Genital
Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage
jon Displacement Denial Compensation
i ae ‘hetae
Loy Z\
pas pst,
=“
bo4 i
Womb Social Needs Perceptions |
= ae aan
‘Personality
Soe
a
cal ew
i,
Meese Pe 4
aoe ony eee
oe 2
uae,
é
ath‘Trait-Based Approaches to Personality
basedon
L
fT
which are
t
‘Tendencies
for Behar
L
which
“1
ewe Roan Darl
oS
Se Ae Rete
studied by
whom,
Alport Cael
L iN
posted used posted ncn
a boob s.lmUhm
Cenwal secondary ‘Factor Bigs Hans settey
Analysis Traits Eysenck Gray
I, TNF ] |
which such which such which posited posited
as are as are
Jody J fl
Personality. Crowds Brain Systems:
a 5
Extraversion which are based on which are
Te [
at
‘oon oe
Stee. /\ ce eet Sie
= es
rmomintoreia coumisaty | |
oo ae
Sensitivity SensSocial Cognitive
Approaches to Personality
L
—
based on may be explained by
| mn Gg ey
| Learned Expectancy Reciprocal Cognitive!
Patterns Theory Determinism Affective
| of Thinking. a ‘Theory Theory
Ww Sy
j a9 J : c~ .
for developed based developed based studied based
| by on by on by on
Specific Julian Expectation Value Albert Self Walter Cognitive
Social Rotter Bandura Efficacy Mischel Person
Situations / | Variables
placed on based on which are
J ¢ 0 , > Y
Interaction Encodings Expectancies Affects Goals Competencies
and Values ‘and
Self-Regulation
Plans
between
YY
Thoughts EnvironmentHumanistic Approach to Personality
J
based on
>> Self-Actualization
v
studied by
oo —__
Abraham Maslow
posited posited
is
Self Concept Deficiency Growth
YO \ = Orientation Orientation
divided inta seeks has leads to
“. b L
Ideal Self_ Real Self Positive Self-actualizing Peak Experiences
Regard Tendency |
\ i
if congruent through lead to
will lead to J {
Evaluation {
FS
Self Others
J
may create
Conditions
of ‘Worth
‘may distortPersonality Testing
CTO SN
may be done with must have is used for
Life self Situational Observer Accuracy Employee Selection
outcomes Reports Tests Ratings Poa .
| ¥ { —_~
measured by to help guided by but won't
“7 predict
oe | !
Validity Reliab
_ ality iy
a Ethical ‘Actual Job
Standards Performance
Objective Projetive Reduce Reduce
— Theft Disruptive
+ — TY Behaviors
such as such as inwhich
oN oN J to proves
NEO-PL-R MMPI Thematic “Rorschach Subjects
Apperception Ink Blot d
1 Test (TAT) Test t Misuse of
+ “eat Results
organized into developed loped respond
by by 0
“NY ey
Ctinical Validity ‘Henry Christina Hermann Ambiguous
Scales Seales Murray Morgan Rorschach Stimuli
to detect to detect
“N “»
Personality Personality Lying Uneooperative
‘Traits Disorders SubjectsPersonality
eee
‘may be explained by ‘may be measured by
CY ST i
Trait Humanistic ‘Assessment
Theories Theories
7 LW, Theories L i
developed including J developed ule
. dots
yd woos ii) vey
Gordon Hans Bigs Carl Abraham Life Self Situational Observer
nine eek The teen Nel ousenes sopes "ta Suis
Albert Julian Walter may be
bch ated oust lon “oer Wi
fit enn omcy Pom Ale Rtas J
‘Theorists:
: Onjctne Pre
itn
son My
Bowlby Ainsworth