VOL. 3, NO.

J. THERMOPHYSICS

232

Erratum
Ablation with a Large Fraction
of Solid Removal
George Y. Jumper Jr.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute,
Worcester, Massachusetts

and
James E. Hitchcock
Air Force Institute of Technology,
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
[JTHT 2, pp. 264-270 (1988)]
HE figures on pages 266 and 267 were mislabeled inadvertently during production of the paper. The reprinted figT
ures follow, correctly labeled with their respective captions.

REGULATOR

Fig. 5 Typical set of recession profiles for composite models.

x
0.8

o>

VACUUM

15

30

45

60

75

90

BODY POSITION (DEGREES)

Fig. 6 Experimental carbon dioxide mass loss from pure substance

models compared to theoretical predictions (all data normalized by
the predicted stagnation-point mass loss).
Fig. 3 System for producing ablation models.

-BLIMP.

ID

Q
LLJ
N

-25.4mmFig. 4 Typical set of recession profiles for pure carbon dioxide

models.

15

30

45

60

75

90

BODY POSITION (DEGREES)

Fig. 7 Experimental carbon dioxide mass loss from composite models compared to theoretical prediction for pure substance (all data
normalized by the predicted stagnation-point mass loss).