Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
653118/2014
SUPREME
CIVIL DIV.
: PART 54
-----------------------------------------X
LUKASZ GOTTWALD p/k/a DR. LUKE, KASZ
MONEY, INC. and PRESCRIPTION SONGS, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
- against
Index No.
653118/14
-----------------------------------------x
KESHA ROSE SEBERT p/k/a KESHA,
Counterclaim
Plaintiff,
- against
Defendants.
-----------------------------------"-----x
MOTION
60 Centre Street
New York, New York
February 19, 2016
B E FOR
E
HON. SHIRLEY WERNER
(Appearances
KORNREICH,
Justice
on the following
page.)
,,
2
1
A P PEA
RAN
C E S :
2
MITCHELL, SILBERBERG & KNUPP, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12 East 49th Street - 30th Floor
New York, N.Y.
10017
BY:
CHRISTINE LEPERA, ESQ.
JEFFREY M. MOVIT, ESQ.
3
4
5
6
GERAGOS & GERAGOS, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
Kesha Rose Sebert
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
BY: MARK GERAGOS, ESQ.
TINA GLAND IAN , ESQ.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ALSO PRESENT:
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, Defendant
550 Madison Avenue
New York, N.Y.
10022
BY: DAVID JACOBY,
Senior Vice President
Business & Legal Affairs
20
21
22
23
24
25
Robert
PROCEEDINGS
1
COURT OFFICER:
THE COURT:
Good morning.
the microphones
and everyone
Motion
major action,
Number,
10
I believe
but to dismiss
11
and that's
12
made on behalf
13
company
14
15
16
behalf.
17
I -- it does involve
18
Songs,
19
counterclaim.
20
it's 17.
the counterclaims
which
the
of Kesha.
Incorporated,
Prescription
Entertainment,
So that motion
And certainly
There is
of -- of Mr. Gottwald,
Songs and
which is also
is made on his
and
Motion
21
which
22
23
in front of me.
Kasz Money,
All
to dismiss
here.
can hear.
Sequence
Records,
LLC.
24
under
25
Robert
Kemosabe
are basically
motions
made
Let
PROCEEDINGS
1
also
(a) (1).
alternative,
of action
it's really
11
injunction,
and specifically
12
be enjoined
from enforcing
13
various
14
contracts,
there.
asking
exclusivity
provisions
in the
Is it "Prescription
16
MS. LEPERA:
17
THE COURT:
20
involved
so
is for a preliminary
15
entity
actions
contracts.
not be granted.
are contract
against
Number
19
to dismiss
10
entity.
to strike, in the
18
Yes.
Prescription
Songs"?
the preliminary
injunction
goes even
21
further
22
issue--and
23
publishing
24
marketplace,
25
asking
basically.
That's
Songs to
PROCEEDINGS
1
copyrights.
Am I correct?
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
injunction
first.
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
on?
MR. GERAGOS:
11
THE COURT:
Sure.
Mike Geragos,
Is your microphone
on?
G-E-R-A-G-O-S.
Is the red
light on?
13
14
summarized
10
12
Okay.
MR. GERAGOS:
the amplification,
if that's ...
15
THE COURT:
16
MR. GERAGOS:
Okay.
And I think that is a fair summary
17
18
19
interestingly
20
irreparable
21
declarations,
22
23
this
24
25
within
enough,
the irreparable
which to perform.
Robert
is that she
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
alleging
career.
Recordings,
which basically
recordings,
has copyright
to do aW~ithlcopyrigh~,
interest.
10
we'll
There
And you're
Songs,
frankly, who
P.
~"l
which
11
MR. GERAGOS:
12
THE COURT:
13
harm to Sony.
14
at this point.
15
16
You're
You're arguing
no irreparable
companies
Three or four?
I think it's fair to say that
three.
17
THE COURT:
18
MR. GERAGOS:
19
THE COURT:
Three.
Three majors.
And wouldn't
20
blindly
21
22
there's
MR. GERAGOS:
there's
But the --
-- if one -- if a Court
MR. GERAGOS:
Well,
23
anything
24
25
fact remains
to the industry.
her on ice.
Robert
The
of the abuse
PROCEEDINGS
1
allegations,
anything
generated.
because
is being produced.
Nothing
There's
So it's not as if
no income being
is --
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
Your major
is saying she
Correct.
Now, reading
10
11
Kemosabe
12
nothing
13
plenty
14
15
she wants
16
17
Mr. Gottwald.
18
another
19
20
involvement.
21
Recordings
noticed
there, recording
artists,
any involvement
without
23
of the way.
24
need a preliminary
25
for?
any involvement
is there was
of Mr. Gottwald,
Robert
that say he
to record
to work
of
22
producers,
has
Why do you
to
PROCEEDINGS
1
MR. GERAGOS:
wanted
to address
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
wanted
to address
Pardon?
I'm glad you asked
by them.
interest
else.
10
in Kesha succeeding,
Number one,
is that he has no
--
THE COURT:
11
12
preliminary
13
it, because
it.
I mean
that.
injunction.
MR. GERAGOS:
It is in a sense.
You're talking
14
15
16
them.
17
it.
18
19
footnote,
20
own opposition
21
tracks.
else is controlled
by
22
23
everything
THE COURT:
Well, first
itself, in their
he's a producer
believe
24
MR. GERAGOS:
25
THE COURT:
Robert
Right.
Paragraph
6.
PROCEEDINGS
beneficiary
recordings,
or whatever
3
4
MR. GERAGOS:
it was.
Right.
THE COURT:
become
without
an issue of damages
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
preliminary
11
six
for trial.
That really
injunction
MR. GERAGOS:
stance.
Only when
to order
13
number
14
15
THE COURT:
16
MR. GERAGOS:
17
THE COURT:
or anything
You're mixing
else --
everything
You're mixing
20
likelihood
21
now.
up.
19
to allow her to
Well--
12
18
six of her
tracks.
10
to produce
injunction
claims
injunction.
deals with
aside for
Okay?
22
MR. GERAGOS:
23
THE COURT:
Okay.
It deals with irreparable
harm, which
24
25
again,
to work.
PROCEEDINGS
1
ability
to work.
2
3
Dr. Luke."
10
MR. GERAGOS:
They're
That's
what I am saying.
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
Because
large company.
Why not?
That's why I said "Illusory."
10
involvement,"
11
12
people
report
13
to Dr. Luke.
THE COURT:
out a record,
out a record,
15
16
this preliminary
17
to assure
18
"Mr. Gottwald.
injunction
is about.
MR. GERAGOS:
all of those
14
19
it's not a
about putting
20
becomes
illusory,
21
company
22
record.
23
nobody's
24
an artist,
25
we're
Robert
but
talking
She can
harm that
in which she
11
PROCEEDINGS
1
can produce
gets promoted.
get promoted,
already
to destroy
That's
So if it doesn't
her.
because
10
record without
11
decimates
12
where you
THE COURT:
don't
7
8
his involvement,
but -but I
here.
to allow her to
I think it really
your argument.
When you're
what
13
they'll promote
14
15
16
saying
17
face--and
18
not promote
19
millions
20
her recordings,
21
22
business.
23
it or not.
her to record.
we
And if
You're
that Sony will cut off its own nose to spite its
that's Kemosabe
Records--they
the recordings,
of dollars
already
got a vested
25
investment
they've spent
and internationally.
in this.
So
And they're in
interest
And -- right.
in Dr. Luke.
in Dr. Luke.
Robert
promoting
interest
MR. GERAGOS:
24
even though
both nationally
They're
Their investment
in Dr. Luke
12
PROCEEDINGS
1
continues
pale
on --
in comparison.
7
8
to work, continues
THE COURT:
you're
talking
THE COURT:
quote,
12
unquote,
MR. GERAGOS:
14
THE COURT:
15
MR. GERAGOS:
16
THE COURT:
in bed with
not here
let's be clear,
Records.
Correct.
And Kemosabe
Records
13
makes Kesha
They're
about Kemosabe
11
17
MR. GERAGOS:
10
to have artists,
has in its,
artists
who are
Correct.
-- who Dr. Luke works with.
Correct.
And when I say "Dr. Luke," I mean
Mr. Gottwald.
18
MR. GERAGOS:
19
THE COURT:
20
MR. GERAGOS:
21
THE COURT:
22
And a company,
23
these companies
24
competitive,
25
streaming
Mr. Gottwald.
That will be interchangeable.
Right.
But Miss Sebert
particularly
and everything
Robert
is one of those.
else.
share to a lot -- to
PROCEEDINGS
1
artist
promote
who is popular,
MR. GERAGOS:
embolden
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
speculations
continues
they're
obviously
That's
They aren't
already
the problem.
and speculation.
conclusions
or
to work, he
on the charts.
They--
14
MR. GERAGOS:
15
Paragraph
16
They've
6 of the
already
17
They are
to work without
him.
the six.
--
THE COURT:
No, I don't.
19
MR. GERAGOS:
20
THE COURT:
21
invested millions?
MR. GERAGOS:
12
18
THE COURT:
10
13
Because
11
who is making
3
4
13
Well, they've
at the trial
already
case.
22
MR. GERAGOS:
23
24
performance.
25
illusory.
They've
already
seeking damages
Robert
agreed to that by
and not specific
forfeited
any 'right
PROCEEDINGS
1
remedies.
they've
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
specific
They're
mutually
THE COURT:
asked
They've
So you're
Dr. Luke.
10
MR. GERAGOS:
11
THE COURT:
12
contract;
13
time ago.
14
exclusive
for
performance.
MR. GERAGOS:
because
16
perpetuity.
17
the reasons
18
19
That's
20
everything
record with
last I heard,
15
21
14
-- This is a service
Which is exactly
she's on a personal
services
contract
tried so desperately
possible
in California.
THE COURT:
22
themselves
put venue
23
negotiated
contracts,
24
The contracts
25
her lawyer,
in stating
The contracts
are explicit
Robert
-- it's one of
to get it into
that last in
on both sides.
15
PROCEEDINGS
1
had lawyers.
the negotiation
negotiated.
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
10
still viable
11
not a dismissal
12
claims
13
14
preliminary
15
equitable
16
in California;
else, and we
there's
the
They are
law.
The tort
you bring here are New York law, we will deal with
motions.
injunction,
relief.
17
MR. GERAGOS:
18
THE COURT:
You're asking
decimate
20
by two parties
21
contracts
are typical.
It's no different
22
contracts
which require
certain
23
require
24
to decimate
a contract
Correct.
19
25
And part of
negotiated
and signed
exclusivity
number
of recordings
and
You're asking me
16
PROCEEDINGS
1
understand
Dr. Luke."
I don't
is.
MR. GERAGOS:
What my problem
is that there is
Her allegations
going
to do anything
else except
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
10
making.
You're
11
happen.
12
is to do the commercially
13
that business
14
15
interest
16
artist
17
they're
18
not
you're
people
not saying
this is going to
venue;
reasonable
and certainly
my -- my instinct
a business
willing
19
invested
20
they're
21
done that.
22
23
interest
whatsoever
24
interest,
they've
25
Yes.
a recording
MR. GERAGOS:
like Sony
you are
them"?
They're
They've already
Robert
in promoting
her.
He has no
Sony has no
So
17
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
Dr. Luke
Well, if I could just finish.
I just want to -- You know, let me
contract.
He's
MR. GERAGOS:
No, he didn't.
damages:
in contract
10
He asked for
in contract
He wasn't
with me.
He
11
When you
12
13
14
15
16
they've
17
business
18
19
years.
20
is in promoting
not Kesha.
interest,
21
commercially
22
promote
23
allegations
24
25
reasonable
their
Kesha's
allegations,
Robert
all
stature or credibility
lurid
her to give
to take down
PROCEEDINGS
1
Dr. Luke is
it couldn't
18
in a fantastical
in the reality
THE COURT:
of a business
I think -- Frankly,
not on fantasy
against
case against
And they're
10
to be here.
11
against
12
them.
-- against
Miss Sebert.
Sony.
That's
Miss Sebert.
misstated
14
Records
15
MR. GERAGOS:
No.
a case against
the facts.
Who is "They"?
17
MR. GERAGOS:
18
THE COURT:
19
MR. GERAGOS:
entities
21
22
13
20
This is
16
which
world.
I can't.
and speculation,
world,
Okay.
You do this in your complaint
I'm referring
to Gottwald
also.
and his
sued here.
THE COURT:
23
MR. GERAGOS:
24
another,
25
Sony
-Robert
19
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
MR. GERAGOS:
I never stated
that.
Well, they're
relationship
what
7
8
in -- they have a
a $60 million
where
-- whereby
investment,
then
-- we cited the
other
case,
hearing.
10
get Sony's people here, let's get Dr. Luke here, let me
11
12
so that we aren't
13
in fantasy.
14
somehow
15
from destroying
16
business
Because
standpoint.
THE COURT:
promoting
19
17
18
speculating,
Kesha?
MR. GERAGOS:
I would suggest
Dr. Luke by
to do with another.
that it is somewhat
20
naive
21
Swidler
22
statements,
23
24
25
this contest.
Robert
or proffer
in support of Luke in
20
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
this woman.
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
there is nothing
I can't, because
she's diverse.
in those papers
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
understand.
Frankly,
I don't -- I don't
10
spent millions,
11
it.
12
point on Kesha.
talking about
13
millions
14
for other
15
dollars
16
them money?
You're
of dollars
issues.
more internationally
at one
And then
17
from
MR. GERAGOS:
her recordings
Because
of
18
compared
19
generated
20
21
22
23
the time.
24
25
he is promoting,
Robert
So there isn't
generated
anything.
saying that
at
he is still doing
Portas, RPR, CRR
producing
artists,
he
PROCEEDINGS
1
21
THE COURT:
The illusory
now to go
asking
to do.
MR. GERAGOS:
Well, no.
Because
saying
where
-- trying to basically
10
incentive,
11
popular
she's obligated
And there's no
for her to become
12
You're
13
14
100 percent
15
problem
that's controlled
is.
16
THE COURT:
17
physically
18
issues.
19
Your argument
because
20
reading,
21
22
to.
I'll
in
.feet of papers.
23
papers
24
from a doctor
25
saying this.
Robert
and
the point.
22
PROCEEDINGS
1
problems,
trauma,
otherwise.
nothing
issue
nothing,
nothing,
here.
under seal or
records.
There is
The
--
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
~OnlY
arguing
papers.
It is the issue.
Please.
reason I point
is n0tfacts,
They're
conclusions,
they're
speculation.
She
10
11
asking me to presume
12
in a very competitive
13
this industry,
14
15.
you're
16
Records
17
what they ask him to do or that they can't take over and
18
promote
19
20
21
recordings,
22
23
thread,
24
25
him.
that an entity
to work.
You're
such as so~who
~
position
with
-- with
asking me to assume
is
UlMf'lI:l\l~
that they're
that Gottwald
of people
which is another
-- another
can ignore
-- you're
issue.
But the
I don't understand
Robert
to work without
23
PROCEEDINGS
1
extraordinary
measure
of issuing an injunction.
MR. GERAGOS:
Well, because,
supplemental
Luke was,
10
is,
"We categorically
with competitors
reject
Well, you're
that."
asking
MR. GERAGOS:
No, no.
offered
13
her home,
14
was.
15
16
categorically
17
is what they've
18
which
for this to be
so to speak, to be at Sony.
fine.
for
Why doesn't
that
reject everything
embraced,
that.
That's
Second
12
they categorically
today,"
rejected,
19
20
for damages.
THE COURT:
11
THE COURT:
So you're
21
MR. GERAGOS:
22
THE COURT:
of Sony.
Correct.
The
23
under
24
provides
25
So whatever
Robert
that
24
PROCEEDINGS
1
MR. GERAGOS:
THE COURT:
Correct.
And that the payments,
though, would
MR. GERAGOS:
Payments
offer
highest
levels at Sony.
THE COURT:
10
the letter.
11
one.
Well, it doesn't
12
MR. GERAGOS:
13
MS. LEPERA:
14
We represent
15
Prescription
Okay.
Entertainment.
16
17
THE COURT:
18
MS. LEPERA:
19
--
20
the president
21
subsidiary.
22
24
asking
25
relief.
Records,
is
a wholly owned
This
23
Kasz Money,
Miss Sebert's
-- asking
for extraordinary
injunction
PROCEEDINGS
1
essentially
contracts
up through
label, Kemosabe
transferred
initial
denuding
and rewriting
Records.
upstream,
of any contracts
multi-contract,
10
business
11
production.
The copyrights
commercially
13
THE COURT:
14
MS. LEPERA:
15
THE COURT:
in a studio
18
23
24
25
--
Sure.
17
22
In other words,
supervision
of people
MS. LEPERA:
essentially
Robert
Records.
Well, that is
Well, they're
asking
at Sony rather
The problem
what you're
with her
et cetera,
Kemosabe
THE COURT:
in a
recording
required.
a relationship
16
MS. LEPERA:
The production
21
have been
no basis
to terminate
12
exactly
to a new Sony
relationship
20
of
There is absolutely
19
a multitude
transfer
25
-for the
than at Kemosabe.
is
suggesting,
PROCEEDINGS
26
without
without
claim,
another
Sony, Kemosabe
promoting
have a CEO.
fulfill.
which
and irreparable
recordings
contractual
11
MS. LEPERA:
12
THE COURT:
13
MS. LEPERA:
to Sony to
relationships
--
How?
-- and Sony.
How?
There would be effectively
breach of
contract.
15
THE COURT:
16
the contract.
17
would
Basically
18
MS. LEPERA:
19
THE COURT:
21
22
contracts
23
provided
24
But basically
at Sony and
it would
Robert
it
Right.
MS. LEPERA:
is Kemo---
label
20
25
they
harm to my clients
THE COURT:
simply because
if dismantled
is that somehow or
Ultimately
10
14
Records
contracts,
but
PROCEEDINGS
27
precisely,
have
about
the history
no one.
to seek to terminate
allegations
to promote
She basically
the contract,
decided
12
13
those horrific,
14
completely
15
concept
16
fact contrarily
supported
17
success
of what he did.
18
that trajectory
19
Notwithstanding
because
THE COURT:
allegations,
So this whole
that bettered
of
her at
And now
now?
22
MS. LEPERA:
23
24
25
11
offering
to note
contract.
20
what we
10
21
where we
THE COURT:
Robert
There's
-- here's
injunction
-- we're here to
You had --
PROCEEDINGS
28
In your papers
record
any involvement
without
MS. LEPERA:
Yes.
to allow her to
of Dr. Luke.
that.
THE COURT:
MS. LEPERA:
Okay.
recording
contract.
exclusive
production
agreement.
a producer
separate
11
12
They create
13
of KMI originally,
14
Records.
15
group,
16
17
18
commercially
19
20
recordings.
it's not in
Those recordings
of many different
people,
believe
they promote
it, et cetera.
That's a question
for Sony.
so.
MR. EDELMAN:
24
THE COURT:
shareholders
Robert
to
held corporation?
MS. LEPERA:
label
They package
satisfactory,
23
25
-- a
comprised
works is that
THE COURT:
21
22
studio,
10
is an
29
PROCEEDINGS
1
MS. LEPERA:
THE COURT:
MS. LEPERA:
THE COURT:
are supposed
-- to make money.
THE COURT:
MS. LEPERA:
10
what's
are basically
So here's
thrown
difference
13
production:
14
15
inconsistent
16
specific
17
New York.
18
19
up the exclusivity
between
if her
in the toilet.
the exclusive
to the
recording
and
There's
side, as
performance
That's not
to suggest it.
12
of a personal
no election
performance,
of remedy
contract
in
that we didn't
so, therefore,
we've given
obligation.
20
THE COURT:
21
MS. LEPERA:
22
THE COURT:
23
Right.
-- they are open to suit.
been happening
11
And
to act
MS. LEPERA:
recordings
Yes.
Am I correct?
Yes.
to work --
Right.
-- in a situation
want to work.
24
MS. LEPERA:
25
THE COURT:
Robert
Right.
It's slavery.
PROCEEDINGS
1
MS. LEPERA:
30
Correct.
We simply
the exclusivity
effect
ultimately
Kemosabe
contracts
maintained
Records,
basis
11
12
something
13
to rewrite
There's
Okay?
16
17
counsel
18
provisions
19
other party
20
deliver
25
going up to
to fulfill that.
reasonable
absolutely
zero
conclusion
15
24
a single
and that
that
is going to go awry.
Miss Sebert
23
There's
speculative
14
22
into obligations
contracts
that
is in force and
10
21
to maintain,
claim by
in any court.
THE COURT:
to account,
refusing
to want to
case.
MS. LEPERA:
three cases
--
THE COURT:
Robert
Yes.
only two or
PROCEEDINGS
1
MS. LEPERA:
distinguishable
31
--
THE COURT:
And
very different.
MS. LEPERA:
Milstead
and Then.
different,
single predicate
entire underpinning
both completely
distinguishable.
relinquished
11
course,
12 .
specific
13
14
to go do something.
15
remains
16
breach
17
royalties
18
an ancillary
19
Prescription.
our exclusivity
provision,
They basically
performance
and thereby
which is, of
to require someone
to date, including
20
for failure
There's not a
10
not true.
Both very
for failing
to deliver
for
certain
and performances
to deliver
songs to
21
waived,
22
performance.
23
contrary,
24
not inconsistent
25
say, in furtherance
we cited it extensively
Robert
remedies,
of promoting
and validating
the
on
PROCEEDINGS
32
contract.
judgment,
completely,
that --
6
7
it's a technicality.
in fact, belied,
THE COURT:
preliminary
8
9
A declaratory
I'm going
to get into
injunction.
MS. LEPERA:
and I must address
But they've
it, because
raised
underpinning
11
of success
12
that we waived
13
14
success
15
harm.
16
17
completely
18
mooted,
19
The recording
20
21
no basis
23
24
25
this preliminary
there is no claim
10
22
in
injunction
on the likelihood
on the merits,
Irreparable
dealing
by the record,
ultimately
there's
has to be delivered
argument
that
likelihood
of
with irreparable
unsupported
because
It's a technical
judgment
I think is
but, however,
that's
no production
required.
to a Sony-owned
label,
there's
record without
to allow her to
him.
MS. LEPERA:
The recording
Yes.
Well, that's
--
Robert
the production.
33
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
MS. LEPERA:
THE COURT:
MS. LEPERA:
THE COURT:
without
Yes.
Yes.
Produce
without
I understand.
him.
The production.
Yes.
You're willing
him.
MS. LEPERA:
THE COURT:
Right.
irreparable
the
harm argument.
10
MS. LEPERA:
11
12
work
13
obviously,
we believe,
is choosing
14
delivering
recordings,
by not delivering
15
obligated
16
It's a question
17
Completely.
to do so.
There's
Not to mention
And she
to do that by not
songs when she's
of degree.
So this whole,
no other irreparable
19
they have.
20
balance
21
arguments
22
what you've
23
position
24
25
of the equities,
because
harm argument
of being substantially
that
is correct on the
Robert
-- You
18
in the papers.
harmed
being put in a
in all of these
investiture,
the whole --
PROCEEDINGS
34
contractual
that point,
because
contracts
can't
is preempted
transfer.
clients
copyright
to invalidate
transfers.
these contracts.
Clause, not
that contains
cite, but
a copyright
transfers
11
maintained.
and delivered
them up.
13
14
sustainable.
15
request,
16
the burden
17
here.
18
This Court
Preemption
10
12
they're asking
that contain
invalidate
And I do go back to
Prescription
injunction,
under
the standards
from likelihood
19
success
20
the equities,
21
injunction
22
defendants
to irreparable
there is absolutely
and
of
harm, to balance
23
THE COURT:
24
MS. LEPERA:
-- entertained.
25
MR. EDELMAN:
Good morning,
Robert
injunction
in this
is not
Songs' mandatory
requesting
for the
Thank you.
Your Honor.
Scott
of
35
PROCEEDINGS
1
Edelman
of Gibson,
Dunn on behalf
of Sony.
you pointed
predicated,
nominally
seeks to enforce
agrees
Records
or Sony Music.
Kemosabe
the assent,
is
Records,
12
Records
13
of remedies
it actually
by which she
not engaged,
So there really
15
the framework
16
consider
17
Music,
18
this entire
19
against
with respect
and Sony
on which
to be based.
about
commercial
21
22
23
of Daniel
reasonableness
Records
the declaration
vice president
-_
affidavit.
Robert
to even
Records
of remedies
to your question
-- commercial
we haven't
Your Honor,
20
THE COURT:
to be an
Kemosabe
there's no election
PI purports
because
is no basis,
an injunction
because
purports
have obviously
.14
robust
And,
while it does
the agreement
11
25
in
10
24
As
PROCEEDINGS
1
MR. EDELMAN:
36
the irreparable
business
she was.
Records
an R&D
spend millions
of dollars
does in Paragraph
15 of his affidavit,
10
agreement
11
to hire Gottwald
12
13
14
Your Honor,
15
January
16
expressly
17
18
producer
19
does not have to work with Dr. Luke if she does not want
20
to.
21
to produce
that nothing
agreement,
producers
And, in fact,
which is dated
and - - to approve
engagement,
Under
22
going
23
Sony would
24
25
is also in Paragraph
15 of Mr. Zucker's
as a
that agreement
Robert
with
Your Honor,
Kesha
to approve
in
she
that it's
of Miss Sebert.
to record, Sony
to record--that
declaration--she
PROCEEDINGS
37
has refused
to do so because
motivations
with respect
interest
is in her success,
success,
exclusive.
to this lawsuit.
our interest
which
But our
is in Dr. Luke's
the parties
have made,
which
self-interest
that is Dr. Luke does what he does with his company, with
in
10
other artists,
11
producers
12
A&R, marketing,
13
interface
14
15
grounded
Records
with other
umbrella,
-- and, of course,
recording,
production
this to provide
16
to this hearing,
17
18
19
against
20
parties
in a situation
21
22
bankruptcy
23
record
company
with a remedy
which refused
THE COURT:
25
MR. EDELMAN:
Robert
her, prior
injunction.
Records
the need
And it would
either
another
24
-- she
So we have positioned
context,
promotion,
involving
breaches
to account
one in a
by a
--
Right.
-- to a recording
artist.
There are
PROCEEDINGS
38
no allegations
between
obviously
deposition
fit within
8
9
testimony,
which are
but there's
certainly
no allegation
help them
see no basis
10
injunction
11
which
12
consider
13
is an equitable
14
15
of
no suggestions
THE COURT:
You can
state them.
16
MR. EDELMAN:
17
touring,
18
recording,
19
20
she's -- she's
THE COURT:
21
being produced
22
it?
23
Well, I mean,
MR. EDELMAN:
Well, recording
or disseminated
without
doesn't
Certainly
does
25
Honor.
Portas, RPR, CRR
the recordings
really matter,
24
Robert
she's
studio, Your
PROCEEDINGS
1
And,
first album.
nothing
between
that happen.
successful
with her
better
So is Kemosabe
Records.
the parties
39
10
MR. EDELMAN:
11
THE COURT:
12
MR. GERAGOS:
We would like
An injunction
relationships
THE COURT:
in having
remedy to make
Okay.
Thank you, Your Honor.
Just one minute.
-- you asked --
13
when
14
15
response.
16
record
17
18
neither
19
I finished
They didn't
22
"Sebert agreed
25
-- Paragraph
they mislead,
12 or Footnote
that Gottwald
THE COURT:
you have anything
and
because
the
12 states that,
this already.
__
Yes.
The question
II
Do
MR. GERAGOS:
Robert
that Kesha
21
24
is."
20
23
40
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
Okay.
preliminary
likelihood
that's
showing
or the equities
injunction.
At this point
basically
irreparable
opportuni ty to record,
11
12
recording
13
and producing,
there was a
Sony, certainly,
16
destroyed
17
18
preliminary
19
ultimate
20
if the contract
really.
Gottwald's
relief requested
harm
involvement.
and copyrights
injunctions
in
15
the
that has to be --
I don't believe
10
14
I am denying
of success, because
of either
that you
harm to
were
relief,
frankly.
relief.
Also, what it does, what the relief requested
21
22
record,
23
commercial
24
that, really,
25
is undercut
system.
avenue
our
Robert
to allow her to
Dr. Luke's
And
41
PROCEEDINGS
1
the equities
contracts
3
4
the
in this case.
And this shall constitute
the decision
and order
injunction.
motion
counterclaim.
wishes
-- motions.
to.
10
certainly
And, again,
Perhaps
Sony
Okay.
MR. MOVIT:
Mr. Gottwald?
11
THE COURT:
12
MR. MOVIT:
13
THE COURT:
14
MR. MOVIT:
Jeffrey Movit,
15
THE COURT:
16
17
counterclaims.
18
is Motion
19
Songs,
Okay.
M-O-V-I-T.
This is dealing
that you're
Kemosabe
Entertainment
and KMI.
arguing, which
Prescription
Am I correct?
20
MR. MOVIT:
That's correct,
21
THE COURT:
22
answer
23
eight counterclaims.
24
counterclaim
allege
25
they involve
the contracts.
with counterclaims
Robert
Your Honor.
but
I believe
the
PROCEEDINGS
1
first counterclaim
counterclaim,
Prescription
4
violation
against
counterclaims,
10
violence,
3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
three alleges
Law, Section
a violation
City Administrative
of New York
Code 8-107(a).
Five is another
sexual harassment
15
Administrative
17
violation
18
(2).
gender-motivated
19
emotional
20
the defendants.
distress.
infliction
of
is against all of
21
22
MR. MOVIT:
23
25
claim under
16
24
alleges a
Civil Rights
13
14
Number
11
12
contract,
8
9
which is Number
Number
42
these.
claims?
THE COURT:
Robert
Right.
43
PROCEEDINGS
1
different.
2
3
MR. MOVIT:
groups,
Yes.
for efficiency
sake, in.that's
THE COURT:
Okay.
MR. MOVIT:
But, generally,
counterclaims
Mr. Gottwald
this is vociferously
disputed
deposition
by Miss Sebert
largely
against
testimony
10
11
Court
by Mr. Gottwald,
and there's
to the contrary.
So
today.
12
13
counterclaims
14
back
15
incident
16
counterclaims
17
incident
18
counterclaims
19
of physical
20
subsequent
21
counterclaims
22
alleged
23
unsatisfactory.
24
alleged
25
them in
assault
is a purported
incident
in a hotel room
assault
in late 2008.
don't contain
of purported
in the amended
is a purported
The amended
physical
contact
-- the amended
to 2008, rather,
largely
behavior
threats
the remainder
focus on alleged
of the
was virtually
in the counterclaims.
Mr. Gottwald
Your Honor,
event
that
44
PROCEEDINGS
1
Miss Sebert's
cause of action
assault
foreclosed
counterclaims
arising
and battery,
5
6
they're
require,
two separate
Assault
it's so obviously
and battery,
two separate
it's a one-year
statute of limitations
MR. MOVIT:
That's
THE COURT:
-- and clearly
10
MR. MOVIT:
Clearly
correct,
would be barred.
would be barred.
14
variety
15
16
17
18
resident
19
20
crime is alleged
Yes, Your
instead
the amended
of causes of action
the alleged
of limitations
counterclaims
of
assert the
inapplicable
to the alleged
discrimination
acts happening
facts,
here.
22
23
25
--
Your Honor.
13
24
would
Honor.
12
21
call them
statute of limitations.
11
the obvious
by the one-year
THE COURT:
don't assert
The second,
inapplicable
to these
are all under the New York State and New York City Human
Robert
PROCEEDINGS
45
Rights
action
fourth and fifth are under the New York City Human Rights
employment
sexual harassment
in an alleged
situation.
Department
allegation
that a discriminatory
10
against,
11
jurisdiction
12
Iwankow
the First
"Absent an
was discriminated
wrong."
matter
And that's
13
THE COURT:
14
MR. MOVIT:
15
THE COURT:
So you're
16
jurisdiction
17
arguing
no subject matter
MR. MOVIT:
The second,
18
Sony parties
19
20
21
have an argument
affidavit,
incorporate
23
papers,
24
California
which we attached
by reference,
stated in her
to our motion
to dismiss
THE COURT:
Robert
And the
22
25
in
She's a
formerly
And these actions
all occurred
in
but
46
PROCEEDINGS
1
California.
MR. MOVIT:
action,
THE COURT:
California
Am I correct?
MR. MOVIT:
That's correct,
THE COURT:
Alleging
10
MR. MOVIT:
That's correct,
11
13
sake, oppose
14
action
the motion
THE COURT:
another
-- there is also a
statutes.
Your Honor.
causes of
state's
on
laws.
17
MR. MOVIT:
18
THE COURT:
Go ahead.
19
MR. MOVIT:
20
Miss Sebert's
21
judicially
22
asserting
And we respectfully
23
that's without
24
be estopped
25
in this
to this case.
15
16
is granted
briefing
under California
12
And they've
yes.
this argument.
basis.
As a threshold
that
to this argument
estopped
matter,
from
submit that
a party can't
from --
THE COURT:
Robert
subject matter
47
PROCEEDINGS
1
jurisdiction?
MR. MOVIT:
We cannot be estopped
if you'd
It cannot be waived.
from asserting
that.
for Your.Honor.
THE COURT:
I understand.
MR. MOVIT:
Please.
7
8
argument
10
what's
happened
in the California
In the California
12
THE COURT:
13
California
14
And, basically,
15
16
invalidating
17
intertwined
18
required
venue
19
a better
venue.
20
explicitly
22
rights,
23
statutes.
24
what happened
in the
were raised
it was based on
in terms of
actions,
were very
the contract
That's
correct.
THE COURT:
stayed
case.
MR. MOVIT:
21
account of
case --
I understand
the contract.
11
25
And we have --
the California
Robert
but rather
48
PROCEEDINGS
1
MR. MOVIT:
So we respectfully
estopped
challenging
discrimination
dismissed
8
9
estopped
jurisdiction,
for alleged
from
employment
Your Honor.
should all be
jurisdiction.
of limitations
issues as well?
10
MR. MOVIT:
11
some arguments
12
incorporate
We've
in that regard,
by reference
have made
those arguments.
13
THE COURT:
Okay.
14
MR. MOVIT:
15
causes
16
THE COURT:
Yes.
17
MR. MOVIT:
Okay.
18
19
20
21
statute
22
the Administrative
23
action
24
violence
25
Section
8-904 of
motivated
"Commits a crime of
by gender."
And, again,
Robert
to recap, is under a
for gender-motivated
against
Your Honor?
there is a one-year
statute of
49
PROCEEDINGS
1
limitations
damages
for assault.
of violence,
by testimony,
alleged
7
under
it would
but, nonetheless,
purportedly
occurred
12
and contradicted
Even if
still be barred.
MR. MOVIT:
correct,
That's correct,
Your Honor.
That's
Your Honor.
And, as we note in our papers,
while the
13
14
seven-year
15
gender-motivated
16
17
legislature.
18
Cordero
19
legislature
20
21
can't create
22
of limitations
23
be by the judgment
24
assault.
25
acts
10
THE COURT:
11
CPLR 2153.
to recover
statute of limitations
violence,
is preempted
V.
to record a
in the
has so comprehensively
legislated
a field
Moreover,
Robert
as a separate
and independent
for
grounds
PROCEEDINGS
1
to dismiss
non-conclusory
allegation
Mr. Gottwald's
purported
Miss Sebert's
Cordero
just a conclusory
statute
gender-motivated
allegations
gender.
in Miss Sebert's
conduct
allegation
recognized
tracking
violence
without
Your Honor.
That's
the verbiage
of the
15
MR. MOVIT:
That's correct,
Again,
17
limitations
18
Department
19
there's
20
action.
cause of action,
infliction.
in Section
Your Honor.
a one-year
22
23
conclusory.
Well, against
MR. MOVIT:
Robert
allege cause of
Mr. Gottwald
it.
-- I respectfully
to any purported
she may
maybe it's
statute of
The First
lIED.
THE COURT:
factual
for -Intentional
submit,
when there's
it should be dismissed
THE COURT:
25
in the
14
24
by
any substantial
21
that
11
.16
pleading
was motivated
substantiate
13
there is no
10
12
50
interactions
in
51
PROCEEDINGS
1
2
3
THE COURT:
statute
MR. MOVIT:
limitations.
even conceivably
two alleged
submit,
giving
We're standing
arguably
assaults,
standing on
rise to a claim,
11
occurred
12
it can't possibly
13
limitations.
14
Everything
wouldn't
else, we
-- all interactions
are claimed
THE COURT:
actions,
on the statute of
in the counterclaim
interactions
to have
the DJs.
16
MR. MOVIT:
17
With respect
18
19
at this juncture,
20
and Kemosabe
21
action
22
enforceability
23
25
so you're
10
24
Okay,
of limitations.
15
Right.
dismissal
on behalf
Entertainment.
seeks a declaratory
Because
judgment
and interpretation
THE COURT:
not a Prescription
Robert
defendants
I understand.
Songs
of contracts
the
to which
52
PROCEEDINGS
1
MR. MOVIT:
That's right.
THE COURT:
--
MR. MOVIT:
There's
THE COURT:
Right.
MR. MOVIT:
--
THE COURT:
And eight?
MR. MOVIT:
And eight,
Ms. Lepera,
10
11
I would
argument,
- - because
eight?
So basically
performance
you're
arguing
argument
That's correct.
13
THE COURT:
Okay.
14
MR. MOVIT:
16
damages,
17
contract.
18
19
difference
specific
THE COURT:
Miss Sebert
Okay.
there's
performance
MR. MOVIT:
21
MR. EDELMAN:
of the
Scott Edelman.
23
with respect
24
Kemosabe
25
big picture
records,
let me
and
for a second.
Robert
no
and
can argue.
20
22
between
that --
again.
MR. MOVIT:
irreconcilable
it was
if my co-counsel,
12
15
--
controversy
as to that.
could address
THE COURT:
no justiciable
53
PROCEEDINGS
1
alleged
one occurred
allegedly
acts of misconduct
occurred
in 2005, 2008.
THE COURT:
And neither
MR. EDELMAN:
Records
wasn't
MR. EDELMAN:
11
THE COURT:
12
MR. EDELMAN:
14
makes
-- they both
then.
Kemosabe
Until 2011.
10
familiarity
occurred
even formed
THE COURT:
13
your intimate
it certainly
15
And, therefore,
16
allegations
17
against
18
general,
19
20
21
22
are things
23
belief,"
I'm quoting,
24
Records,
25
Kemosabe
Records and
facts, so conclusory
for any of
of
like Paragraph
Robert
they're so
and
or should
violent
and
54
PROCEEDINGS
1
emotional/abusive
conduct
THE COURT:
3
4
statutes
Kemosabe,
Dr. Gottwald
highest
10
they
11
So your argument
So you're
even
13
Records
because
of Dr. Gottwald,
15
talking
16
no entity
Absolutely.
Because,
even
--
Right.
then.
17
MR. EDELMAN:
18
THE COURT:
limitations
issues.
20
21
THE COURT:
22
MR. EDELMAN:
23
24
THE COURT:
25
and
14
19
MR. EDELMAN:
12
is that -- is that
Kemosabe,
official
knowledge
hear without
Okay.
Yes.
feedback.)
it.
Robert
feedback.)
55
PROCEEDINGS
1
MR. EDELMAN:
Okay.
proceeding
cannot
7
8
under a respondeat
THE COURT:
superior
2008 incident
They're not
--
MR. EDELMAN:
10
THE COURT:
11
MR. EDELMAN:
12
held,
13
14
THE COURT:
case --
in the context
Yes.
of an employment
claiming
relationship,
where
--
15
an -- who is an independent
16
whether
17
18
everything
19
contractor
else.
Records
-- I don't know
and
20
MR. EDELMAN:
21
22
have an employee?
23
And
24
these events,
25
Okay.
as to whether
you have to
-- and Kemosabe
Records
the events
Robert
You know.
in question,
56
PROCEEDINGS
1
acceptance
and forgiveness
THE COURT:
of the conduct.
MR. EDELMAN:
the Court.
10
Records
11
Records
against
13
conclusory
14
of these particular
15
Records
allegations
the arguments
17
already
familiar
18
at the time.
the allegations
through
19
20
enforce
21
22
papers
23
to dismiss
25
the agreement,
the causes of
I know you're
Your Honor:
for declaratory
She essentially
relief
seeks to
which we had
injunction
for violation
by
in this case of -- of
causes of action.
16
24
12
in
in existence
Kemosabe
But
wasn't
That was
of the
out that
PROCEEDINGS
57
Records
that there's
no impact within
is required;
of limitations.
second
prejudice.
violence,
again,
11
conclusory
12
gender.
13
14
adequately
15
of limitations,
16
liability,
17
Kemosabe
18
allegations
19
case.
There's
certainly
that's been
a one-year
With respect
statute
of corporate
by
There is no
of gender
there is no imposition
Records
And,
and no -- no
such a contention.
Excuse
21
harassment
22
relying
23
Morris
24
employment
25
based on gender:
on First Department
Agency,
statute.
there's
with
is for bias-related
10
statute
we think the
,20
with Kemosabe
8
9
relationship
Again,
case, Samuels
versus William
relationship
Robert
with Kemosabe
Records
or Sony,
PROCEEDINGS
58
statute.
With respect
action,
Administrative
the alleged
that Kemosabe
misconduct,
Records
Records
on Gottwald
at the time of
10
11
acknowledges
12
(2), I apologize,
earlier,
she
this to anyone.
is for
13
gender-motivated
14
violence
15
Administrative
16
applies
17
cannot possibly
18
19
extraterritorial
20
the Dormant
21
referred
22
conclusory,
23
limitations.
24
statute,
25
situation.
violence.
motivated
She alleges
by gender.
Code, Section
to individuals
apply to my clients.
application
Dormant
In addition
Clause,
to the
which we've
It
Commerce
to in our papers,
are
statute of
Robert
a crime of
liability
in that
59
PROCEEDINGS
THE COURT:
Seven, again,
MR. EDELMAN:
THE COURT:
infliction
statute;
7
8
-- again,
Exactly.
a named party
THE COURT:
MR. EDELMAN:
11
THE COURT:
12
MR. EDELMAN:
--
Okay.
And, so, I think that's everything
Records,
Your Honor.
16
17
appropriate,
the prefatory
although
THE COURT:
19
MS. GLANDIAN:
Glandian
allegations
of argument
incendiary,
18
22
-- to eight.
to strike
21
In eight.'
15
20
reach intentional
right?
not actually
14
it doesn't
10
13
MR. EDELMAN:
-- Are we up to seven?
the same
in the counterclaims
and case law and not
pleading.
Thank you.
Your Honor.
Tina
that works.
See how
Okay?
23
24
MS. GLANDIAN:
25
feedback.)
the arguments
by both
60
PROCEEDINGS
1
plaintiffs
overlap,
into groups
to address,
of their arguments
that's clearly
7
8
9
there is a lot of
period
10
very
12
not defendants
13
them are?
counterclaims
make clear,
that we alleged
over a
THE COURT:
11
of abuse when
--
14
Well, we believe
15
Mr. Gottwald
16
17
had notice.
THE COURT:
18
complaint,
19
doesn't
20
give a defendant
21
itself or himself?
shouldn't
I'm talking
MS. GLANDIAN:
23
alleged
24
obviously
25
but specific
instances
-- I mean weekly,
Port as , RPR, CRR
enough to
can defend
Robert
it be specific
notice
against
certainly
And, of course,
22
issue, should
MS. GLANDIAN:
At the
relationship
daily, monthly
PROCEEDINGS
1
instances,
And,
for purposes
THE COURT:
never
specifically
defend
But they're
not detailed
yourself
8
9
61
against
period
MS. GLANDIAN:
allege
at all.
where it occurred,
on what date.
It
that
things happened?
a lot of what we
course of conduct.
So
10
11
examples,
12
haven't
13
14
15
continuous
16
17
check hers.elf into rehab and was on the brink of, you know,
18
having
19
20
happening
21
22
25
been documented
course of conduct,
an eating disorder,
to her.
and
period as far as
happening
and
of having
suicidal
thoughts,
and
So this is something
THE COURT:
Mr. Gottwald?
MS. GLANDIAN:
23
24
checked
herself
THE COURT:
Robert
PROCEEDINGS
1
MS. GLANDIAN:
62
January
of 2014.
continue
So he did still
to contact
THE COURT:
MS. GLANDIAN:
which
time being,
He did contact
THE COURT:
had no contact
10
MS. GLANDIAN:
like that.
11
argued
12
dismiss,
13
14
15
had to clarify
16
17
today, which
18
well knows,
19
every favorable
in their papers.
Again,
for purposes
is a motion
the Court,
inference
THE COURT:
21
MS. GLANDIAN:
the allegations
we'd be happy
Not conclusory
Correct.
allegations.
to January
23
24
checked
25
continue
are
22
herself
to
obviously
to dismiss
all allegations
of a motion
that by amendment,
20
RPR, CRR
conduct did
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
63
is threatening
or abusive
happened,
specifics
allegation,
is conclusory.
MS. GLANDIAN:
I believe
The only
or the other
in 2005.
one was 2005 and one was
But, beyond
And
this
10
five specific
11
a continuing
12
13
14
conduct
15
16
17
relationship,
18
their
19
20
dynamic
21
instances
course of conduct,
and, clearly,
for purposes
together
--
tort doctrine,
to establish
reinforced
in all of
and so on some
and control
But dominance
22
THE COURT:
23
24
25
he's threatening
Robert
there's
of the course of
You're
Just by saying,
or he's abusive,
Portas, RPR, CRR
"Threats,"
PROCEEDINGS
1
mean by that.
defendants
defend?
64
MS. GLANDIAN:
Again,
Your Honor,
if -- if there's
more
wants,
purposes
specifics
names he would call her, the way he would address her, and
specifics,
certainly
10
those things,
11
12
his --
13
we think, perpetuated
THE COURT:
you're
15
that require,
16
or -- or certain
17
what
18
alleging
and continued
specific violations
types of damages
MS. GLANDIAN:
20
THE COURT:
wasn't
22
of this.
23
it still doesn't
there.
type of atmosphere
So
it's conclusory.
this.
So she knows
and
MS. GLANDIAN:
Robert
statutes
Well
here is
or harassment.
21
through
of specific
19
25
14
24
of facts.
We think, obviously,
if they're
65
PROCEEDINGS
1
recording,
recordings
doesn't
goes in, you're going to say what I do, you're not that
pretty,
out there."
conclusory
is absurd
matter
you're
there's
a million
girls
-- we're making a
specific
to me
allegations
10
11
other girls
12
--"
THE COURT:
13
that sufficient
14
15
16
under
17
Records
18
be a defendant?
statute
20
then becomes
statutes,
of limitations?
even existed,
19
such
MS. GLANDIAN:
is
and
becomes:
Does it fall
Well,
let me address
or Sony be --
both of those
points.
21
As far as Kemosabe:
22
the initial
23
and 2008.
24
was a continuing
course of conduct
25
beyond
the formation
sexual incidents
But certainly,
-- beyond
Robert
in 2005
that this
66
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
very important
discrimination
allegation
8
9
there's
by whom.
We think
10
examples,
11
course
of conduct
12
things
like he cruelly
13
weight,
14
people
15
to do these things.
16
their entire
17
continued
including
blatantly
to humiliate
18
her, he repeatedly
her
relationship,
which clearly
19
20
official
21
equally
in a entity,
criticized
You know,
that compromised
-- clearly
was formed.
22
important
MS. GLANDIAN:
It's
goes:
Again, we've
is liable
It depends
on the conduct.
23
24
her,
25
So if you're
And that's
"Your lyrics are not good, they can't come in, I'm not
Robert
67
PROCEEDINGS
1
these statutes?
the producer.
issue be specific.
too heavy or he called her fat, I'm not sure what your
allegation
when it happened,
10
relationship,
he's
If you're
is, because
that that
relationship,
are important.
11
MS. GLANDIAN:
I agree.
12
this is generally
13
course
14
furthers
15
specifically
16
the counterclaims,
17
and harassing
18
emotionally
19
with,
interest.
that, "Gottwald
had a history
abusive
to the recording
it
And we
including
20
movant's
in the
artists
119 of
of abusing
and
he worked
Miss Sebert."
21
22
corporate
23
24
aspect
25
Gottwald
conduct
movant's
actually
business
entities
of her career.
interest
the
as it allowed him
For instance,
furthered
control
we allege that
he had over her to
68
PROCEEDINGS
1
extortive
and
"
THE COURT:
Wait a second.
that's
whole other
that's different.
business
-- you're
fraudulent
THE COURT:
intertwine
Those contracts,
inducement,
which is a
that isn't
MS. GLANDIAN:
10
11
alleging
relationship
of the contracts
Sure.
in place.
But--
all of that.
12
MS. GLANDIAN:
13
THE COURT:
If you're
alleging
that.
violations
14
rights
15
be specific
16
17
occurred,
18
of these different
19
involved,
20
really
21
your complaint.
22
of
particularly
when you're
entities,
some weren't
MS. GLANDIAN:
you have to
that discrimination,
alleging
it against
all
involved
of human
at the times.
I mean, it
23
or an employee might
24
commit
or discrimination,
25
because
to advancing
the
69
PROCEEDINGS
1
corporate
other context,
restaurant,
bearing
interest.
that he wholly
by discriminating,
harassing
control,
10
if somebody
commits
a sexual
he's prevented
allegations
and making
THE COURT:
interest
at
in any
11
12
interest.
tort it has no
the corporate
owned,
he controlled
and
for
It still doesn't
advance
any corporate
to --
13
MS. GLANDIAN:
Sure it does.
14
THE COURT:
to discriminate.
15
MS. GLANDIAN:
Sure it does.
16
THE COURT:
17
MS. GLANDIAN:
18
position
19
through
his continued
20
period,
21
the transcripts
22
earlier.
23
to understand
24
allege
25
told,
take action
course of conduct
I mean,
in the deposition
sooner because
he.,
who's
in context
person who, as we
specifically
been
PROCEEDINGS
1
this to anybody
strike,
going
genuinely
answer
duress
you've
70
-- doesn't
to.
It's clearly
employer
11
her family's
it's because
there's
And one
12
there's a lot of
10
to questions
career.
THE COURT:
13
regard
14
15
lack of any facts and the lack of any time periods and the
16
inability
to the deposition,
17
because
to defend against
MS. GLANDIAN:
me is the
And, again,
18
concern,
19
20
this with the Court, and if the Court does want more
21
details
22
for purposes
23
24
interactions
25
cited numerous
certainly
I understand
we can definitely
of putting
a elaborate
them on notice
on that.
We thought
this is something
Robert
of specific
And we
PROCEEDINGS
71
THE COURT:
the contractual
the allegations
her.
Well, control
relationship
MS. GLANDIAN:
music,
control
over her.
because
played
from
into the
and discrimination
purpose
of controlling
10
11
treating
12
did.
13
14
purposes
15
every reasonable
16
was something
17
their interactions.
18
19
20
(/h
of a motion
to dismiss,
inference
again, for
are sufficient,
taking
is what he
this
21
THE COURT:
22
MS. GLANDIAN:
if the Court's
Go ahead.
I know they discuss
the lack of
23
subject
24
25
we initially
matter
jurisdiction
brought
Robert
this lawsuit
Obviously,
in California,
that's the
PROCEEDINGS
1
forum
lives.
3
4
THE COURT:
There's
72
different
statutes
MS. GLANDIAN:
in California.
Correct.
statutes.
belief
plaintiff's
statute.
10
11
find ourselves
12
13
not a resident.
14
15
waived
16
17
18
that's
in New York.
these arguments,
Now we
under the
of course, she's
foreclose
and they've
-- even
said we've
impact
We
in New York
sufficient.
I think just the fact that she's here, she's
19
20
been dragged
21
clearly
22
are the ones who argue that there was -- the Court had
23
general
24
continuously
25
jurisdiction
doing business
Robert
she was
in New York.
distinct
Plaintiffs
events
And, again,
that we're
PROCEEDINGS
73
talking
talking
about a ten-year
found,
course of conduct
We're
in which
New York.
the harassment,
'relationship
So, clearly,
the abuse,
everything
certainly
had an impact
11
12
against
13
her choice.
14
obviously
their
in New York.
She didn't
THE COURT:
16
MS. GLANDIAN:
17
THE COURT:
20
court.
for.
MS. GLANDIAN:
24
suffered
it here.
19
trying
bring
But
--
Correct.
23
initially
That wasn't
18
seeking,
into
15
22
And,
21
in
the discrimination,
that encompassed
again,
as evidenced
10
25
in California.
because
be voided,
of these actions.
in a
That's
the California
doing
in California
was
to have her day in court for the wrongs that she had
for over ten years.
THE COURT:
Robert
And she --
74
PROCEEDINGS
1
relief.
MS. GLANDIAN:
THE COURT:
contract
I understand.
So that raises
issue.
MS. GLANDIAN:
Right.
But, again,
discriminatory
think there's
Because--
has had a
THE COURT:
around
supposed
11
claims?
Because
MS. GLANDIAN:
13
THE COURT:
of limitations
Well--
complaint.
15
MS. GLANDIAN:
16
continuing
17
allege
18
19
that continued
21
How am I
12
20
And I don't
that.
10
14
tort doctrine
Again,
period
of --
22
MS. GLANDIAN:
23
THE COURT:
because
24
MS. GLANDIAN:
25
at the
over a decade's
THE COURT:
continuing.
discrimination,
Robert
discrimination.
the complaint
sexual harassment,
Portas, RPR, CRR
doesn't
gender
gender-motivated
say.
75
PROCEEDINGS
1
violence,
that?
statements.
just basically
statute
one-year.
conduct?
of limitations
MS. GLANDIAN:
the standard
11
take favorable
12
continuing,
13
14
course
which is to
She stopped
throughout
the
I believe
recording
yes.
18
THE COURT:
19
MS. GLANDIAN:
20
THE COURT:
21
MS. GLANDIAN:
22
THE COURT:
one can assume
Right.
About nine or ten months before.
So she stopped
recording
MS. GLANDIAN:
again,
to dismiss,
of their career.
MS. GLANDIAN:
25
16
24
arguments?
inferences,
THE COURT:
23
But what
15
Honor,
They're
I mean,
10
17
--
that's something
Robert
The contact
in 2013, so
then.
And,
PROCEEDINGS
76
if the Court would like, but there was contact after she
entered
rehab in January
THE COURT:
MS. GLANDIAN:
continuing,
and we thought,
THE COURT:
of 2014.
again,
Continuing
MS. GLANDIAN:
10
met until
11
conduct
12
threatening
13
enter rehab.
till when?
Well, we made
-- a decade,
shortly before
I mean,
But entering
conduct
15
to do with Gottwald's
16
Kemosabe's
17
result
18
19
MS. GLANDIAN:
or Sony's conduct or -- or
that this is
conduct.
-- we had alleged
THE COURT:
14
But that's a
at
was.
21
(Brief pause.)
22
MR. GERAGOS:
23
for purposes
again
20
I just address
that discrete
24
THE COURT:
25
MS. GLANDIAN:
Robert
No.
point?
I've looked.
conduct,
I guess, as
77
PROCEEDINGS
1
alleged
she stopped
her by not letting her work and not letting her do the
things.
in the complaint
THE COURT:
statutes.
MS. GLANDIAN:
tort doctrine,
health.
THE COURT:
12
MS. GLANDIAN:
nature
14
applies
of the conduct.
when somebody's
THE COURT:
16
MS. GLANDIAN:
tolling
18
doctrines
19
else.
20
something.
21
22
toll on her
-- there's
a tolling
I believe
But equitable
MS. GLANDIAN:
there is equitable
causes
but
tolling
is something
-- specifically
does
in this case
THE COURT:
24
MS. GLANDIAN:
Oh, no.
-- because
mental
Robert
that
There is?
23
25
And until
appropriate
under the
THE COURT:
--
That's damages,
15
17
Right.
took a significant
11
13
the continuing
conduct.
again, we believe
emotional/mental
That's different
10
5
6
recording
78
PROCEEDINGS
1
THE COURT:
MS. GLANDIAN:
purposes
was continuing.
specifics
to dismiss,
THE COURT:
MS. GLANDIAN:
is inclined
So you're
asking
Court
in whole or in part
10
THE COURT:
11
Okay.
12
motions
13
14
the record
to dismiss.
on the two
15
MS. LEPERA:
16
MS. GLANDIAN:
17
MR. EDELMAN:
18
(Whereupon,
19
this in writing.
Okay.
proceedings
were concluded.)
20
000
21
22
23
(
(
24
25
for
~-
'fJE~ER
"OR~~~~
Robert
after-the-fact
[lJ 55/25
again [41J 9/25 39/4 39/20
$11 [1] 20/11
90017 [1] 2/9
41/6 42/19 48/25 49/3 50/4
$11 million [1] 20/11
900676 [lJ 2/13
50/16 52/11 52/21 57/10
$60 [4] 11/24 12/5 12/7 19/3
904 [3] 42/16 48/21 58/15
57/21 57/25 58/8 58/23 59/2
$60 million [4] 11/24 12/5
59/4 59/5 61/8 62/11 63/8
A
12/7 19/3
64/4 64/7 65/23 66/18 70/17
abide [2] 17/5 17/7
71/13 71/17 72/24 73/10 74/5
ability [4J 9/1 9/24 10/1
74/15 75/9 75/25 76/5 76/7
-------------------------------- "*"/-HT--X [3J
77/4 77/8 78/3 78/4
112 1/9
l/i6
able [6J 13/10 13/11 13/12
against [28] 1/5 1/11 4/7
33/11 33/15 61/16
17/23 18/7 18/7 18/8 18/11
1
about [29J 8/14 10/13 10/14
18/11 35/13 35/16 37/19 42/6
1-25 [lJ 1/14
10/16 10/25 11/12 12/8 20/12
42/10 42/19 43/7 45/10 48/23
10 inches [lJ 20/4
24/5 25/10 27/3 27/10 27/10
50/21 53/16 53/17 56/12
100 percent {ll
21/14
27/15 32/3 33/11 35/19 38/2
56/19 60/12 61/6 68/17 70/16
10017 [lJ 2/4
38/6 47/8 54/15 54/15 56/9
73/12
10022 [1] 2/18
60/17 64/17 69/9 73/1 73/2
Agency [1] 57/23
107 [3J 42/12 42/14 58/5
75/21
ago [2J 14/13 75/15
119 [lJ 67/15
above [1] 78/18
agree [6J 7/19 21/8 23/19
12 [3] 2/3 39/21 39/21
above-captioned
{ll 78/18
23/25 66/8 67/11
13 [2] 42/14 58/5
Absent [lJ 45/7
agreed (3J
13/17 13/22 39/22
14 [1] 1/6
absolutely [4J 25/7 30/9
agreeing [2] 11/9 23/24
15 [2] 36/9 36/25
34/20 54/11
agreement [7) 28/8 35/8 36/10
16 [1] 8/18
absurd {ll
65/8
36/14 36/18 56/20 56/20
17 [3] 3/7 3/11 4/10
abuse [9] 6/25 17/23 27/9
agrees [1] 35/9
19 [3] 1/18 3/11 41/18
32/3 57/11 60/5 64/10 73/7
ahead (3) 41/5 46/18 71/21
1989 [1] 45/6
75/23
airplane [1] 43/15
abuser [1] 21/14
albeit [1] 27/13
2
abusing [lJ 67/16
album [2] 39/2 39/2
20 [2] 3/7 3/20
abusive [4J 54/1 63/2 63/25
albums [lJ 36/18
2005 [8J 43/14 49/6 51/7 53/3
67/18
all [77J 3/3 3/4 3/18 4/19
53/4 63/6 63/7 65/22
acceptance [1] 56/1
4/25 7/9 8/14 8/14 8/15 8/18
2006 [lJ 27/9
account (3] 30/19 37/23 47/9
9/6 10/10 10/11 10/21 15/21
2008 [8] 43/15 43/20 49/6
accurate [1] 78/21
15/24 17/10 17/12 18/6 18/22
51/7 53/4 55/3 63/8 65/23
acknowledges
[lJ 58/11
20/8 21/5 21/17 21/20 21/25
2009 [1] 36/15
act [6] 29/4 29/5 34/6 35/21
23/2 23/4 23/11 24/5 25/3
2011 [lJ 53/9
45/8 49/8
25/17 26/21 27/10 27/10 30/8
2013 [3] 62/9 75/16 75/22
action [40J 3/9 3/18 4/6 35/5
31/1 32/2 32/3 33/23 40/11
2014 [6J 62/1 62/22 66/1
35/6 44/2 44/14 44/21 44/24
41/16 42/6 42/6 42/10 42/19
75/19 76/2 76/12
45/2 45/16 46/4 46/14 48/5
44/22 44/25 45/4 45/25 48/1
2016 [lJ 1/18
48/15 48/18 48/20 48/23 49/1
48/6 51/9 51/10 51/18 53/14
2029 [lJ 2/13
50/1 50/10 50/12 50/20 51/1
54/12 55/16 61/1 61/3 61/10
2153 [2J 49/2 50/17
51/11 51/17 51/21 53/20
62/5 62/18 63/16 63/17 63/18
25 fll 1114
54/10 54/10 56/14 56/16
66/6 66/11 67/9 68/11 68/17
56/18 56/23 56/24 57/6 57/8
70/23 71/9 71/16 74/5 75/1
3
58/4 58/12 69/18
76/14 76/18
301 [1] 34/6
actions [8J 4/6 4/8 45/25
allegation [11] 38/5 45/8
30th [1] 2/3
47/16 47/17 47/25 51/15
50/2 50/6 61/6 63/5 63/6
32 [lJ 3/24
73/18
65/7 66/4 67/6 68/5
3211 [1] 43/10
acts [6] 44/18 49/3 49/5 51/5 allegations [31J 7/1 16/4
53/1 53/2
16/9 17/22 17/23 27/9 27/13
4
actually (4) 35/7 50/9 59/8
32/3 38/1 38/2 44/2 47/15
48 [1] 53/22
67/21
50/9 53/16 56/11 56/13 57/11
49th [lJ 2/3
add [2] 46/13 64/6
57/18 58/21 59/15 60/12
addition [lJ 58/17
62/13 62/18 62/20 62/22
5
additional.
[2] 17/25 30/6
63/19 65/8 69/10 71/5 71/13
54 [11 1/2
address [13] 8/2 8/5 32/9
73/11
541 [1] 45/12
42/21 43/2 44/21 52/9 59/25
allege [10] 41/24 43/18 50/19
550 [1] 2/17
60/1 64/9 65/19 71/19 76/23
61/9 67/24 69/24 71/18 74/17
addressed [1] 70/19
75/25 78/4
6
adequately [2J 53/19 57/14
alleged [31] 4/7 43/6 43/12
60 [lJ 1/17
Administrative
[6J 42/12
43/14 43/16 43/21 43/22
60 million [1] 20/12
42/14 42/16 48/22 58/5 58/15
43/24 44/15 44/18 44/20 45/4
644 [1] 2/8
advance [2J 69/4 69/11
45/4 45/11 48/5 49/6 51/7
653118/14 [11 1/6
advancing [lJ 68/25
53/2 55/3 57/25 58/8 60/8
Affairs [lJ 2/19
60/23 61/14 65/22 65/23
7
affidavit [4] 20/1 35/25 36/9
67/20 72/11 75/12 76/8 77/1
79 [2J 42/9 48/19
45/22
allegedly [2] 53/3 53/4
affidavits [11 6/3
all.eges [4J 42/4 42/8 43/22
8
after [11] 55/3 55/25 61/23
58/13
8-107 [3J 42/12 42/14 58/5
61/23 62/2 62/9 62/25 65/21
alleging [10] 6/2 42/16 46/9
8-904 [2J 42/16 48/21
66/1 66/17 76/1
63/23 63/23 64/14 65/1 68/4
auspices [1]
23/20
authority [1] 26/1
avenue
[2]
2/17
40/21
B
back [9] 11/3 27/4 27/9 27/12
34/1 3B/24 43/14 52/24 66/9
balance [2] 33/20 34/19
bankruptcy
[1] 37/22
bar [2J 50/19 50/22
barred [6J 44/9 44/10 44/23
49/9 5B/l 5B/22
base [lJ 40/7
based [llJ 17/4 lB/4 35/1B
44/14 47/9 47/14 51/12 57/13
57/21 71/23 75/9
basically [15J 3/23 4/24 6/5
21/6 26/16 26/20 27/7 29/9
31/11 39/17 40/5 41/25 47/14
52/10 75/4
basis [14] 25/7 26/1 30/10
31/1B 32/21 34/20 35/10
35/14 3B/B 46/23 53/19 5B/24
61/19 72/15
battery [2J 44/3 44/5
be [66] 3/2 4/4 4/12 5/5 12/7
12/19 15/2 15/3 lB/l0 21/7
23/12 23/13 23/22 23/24 24/3
25/15 26/13 26/15 26/17
26/19 26/21 27/23 32/19
32/20 34/10 34/21 34/22
35/10 35/1B 35/22 36/6 40/5
40/1B 40/23 44/9 44/10 44/17
46/24 47/2 47/3 47/1B 4B/3
4B/6 49/9 49/23 50/9 50/10
51/6 55/4 55/17 57/6 60/1B
60/19 61/1 62/15 63/2 63/3
65/17 65/1B 67/4 6B/15 69/2
69/2 70/1 73/17 76/17
bearing (ll
69/4
because [56J 6/25 7/1 B/4
10/B 10/15 11/4 13/3 13/10
14/1 14/15 14/1B 16/B 16/19
17/17 19/13 20/3 20/17 21/5
21/17 23/2 26/4 27/17 27/17
32/9 32/1B 33/20 34/2 35/12
35/17 37/1 39/20 40/5 44/3
51/20 52/7 53/13 54/6 54/11
55/2 61/19 63/B 67/6 6B/B
6B/25 69/17 69/1B 70/B 70/13
71/7 72/23 73/3 73/1B 74/2
74/11 74/23 77/24
become [2J
becomes
[3]
9/7 21/10
10/20
65/12
65/14
B
being ... [14] 22/10 22/24
33/11 33/15 33/22 33/23
33/25 33/25 38/21 40/9 44/17
62/6 70/7 71/24
belied [2] 27/15 32/4
belief [2] 53/23 72/8
believe [17J 3/7 3/7 8/23
22/16 28/22 33/13 37/1 39/18
40/7 41/25 44/6 45/18 60/14
63/7 75/16 77/8 77/16
Belle [2] 55/9 55/11
beneficiary [1] 9/1
besides [1] 21/24
best [2] 16/14 16/14
better [2J 39/5 47/19
bettered [1] 27/18
between [5J 29/12 38/3 39/7
43/19 52/15
beyond [4] 63/8 65/25 65/25
68/12
bias [3] 42/9 57/8 68/16
bias-related (2] 42/9 57/8
big [lJ 52/25
bind [1] 15/9
bit [lJ 37/4
blatantly
(1]
66/13
[17]
2/19
11/22
C
C.R.R [1] 1/24
CA [2J 2/9 2/13
California
[20]
14/18
15/10
{17]
3/16
16/13
[2]
[ll
17/11
16/20
73/13
(1]
55/13
[4]
16/11
35/20
35/20 40/23
commercially [6] 16/12 17/21
25/9 28/18 30/8 37/7
commit [2] 58/16 68/24
commits [2] 48/23 69/3
committed [1] 45/8
companies [2] 6/13 12/23
company [8] 3/13 10/8 10/9
10/21 12/22 30/5 37/9 37/23
compared [1] 20/18
comparison [2] 12/2 20/20
competitive [2] 12/24 22/12
competitors [1] 23/10
complaint [11] 18/18 60/18
68/21 74/14 74/18 74/23 76/3
76/4 76/10 76/19 77/1
completely [10] 27/14 29/14
30/11 31/1 31/6 32/4 32/17
33/10 44/15 44/22
comprehensively [1] 49/19
comprised [1] 28/15
compromised [1] 66/15
concede [1] 8/20
concedes [1] 58/8
conceivably [1] 51/6
concept [2J 27/2 27/15
concern [1] 70/18
conclude [1] 70/8
concluded [1] 78/19
conclusion [1] 30/11
conclusions [3] 13/5 13/6
22/9
conclusory [13] 50/2 50/6
50/23 53/18 56/13 57/11
58/22 61/7 62/20 63/2 64/17
65/7 75/3
conduct [28J 46/9 50/3 54/1
c
conduct ... [25J 56/1 56/9
60/8 61/9 61/15 62/24 63/1
63/11 63/14 65/24 66/11
66/22 67/21 69/19 73/2 75/5
76/11 76/15 76/15 76/16
76/18 76/25 77/5 77/6 77/13
Conflict [lJ 34/5
consider [2) 35/16 38/12
constitute {ll
41/3
constituted
[2]
68/15 75/2
contact [10] 10/15 10/17
43/17 43/19 61/21 62/1 62/3
62/9 75/24 76/1
contain [2] 34/3 43/16
contains
[1]
34/7
contention {ll
57/18
contest {ll
19/25
contested
[1]
38/4
contesting {ll
17/12
context [4] 37/22 55/12 69/2
69/22
continual.ly
[1]
63/17
continue [5]
30/2
36/23
36/24
62/3 62/25
continued
[4]
64/11
66/17
69/19 74/19
continues [4J 12/1 12/1 13/7
13/8
continuing
{20]
62/6
62/14
63/11 63/12 65/24 65/25 66/2
71/15 74/16 74/17 74/21
75/12 75/13 76/5 76/6 76/25
77/4 77/7 77/12 78/4
continuous (2)
61/15
70/23
continuously
[1] 72/24
contract [45]
4/6
4/18
8/19
8/22 9/17 14/12 14/15 15/19
17/5 17/5 17/7 17/8 17/9
17/9 23/23 23/23 24/3 25/9
26/2 26/14 26/16 27/8 27/10
27/18 28/6 28/7 29/16 30/13
31/14 32/1 34/7 38/6 40/15
40/22 41/1 42/1 42/3 47/16
47/17 47/17 51/14 51/24
52/17 73/17 74/4
contractor
[1]
55/15
contracts [22] 4/13 4/14
14/21 14/23 14/24 15/21
15/22 25/2 25/8 26/22 26/23
30/6 30/9 34/3 34/4 41/2
41/25 51/22 68/1 68/3 68/8
73/6
contractual
[5]
26/6 34/1
39/6 71/4 74/1
contractually {ll
21/9
contradicted [1] 49/4
contrarily [1]
27/16
contrary [2J 31/23 43/9
control [10J 63/21 63/22
67/23 67/25 68/7 69/9 71/1
71/3 71/8 77/2
controlled
{3]
a/15
21/13
69/6
controlling [2] 70/10 71/9
controversy
(1]
52/3
copyright [6J 6/7 6/8 34/3
34/6 34/7 34/9
copyrights [6J 5/1 15/23 25/4
26/21 34/1 40/15
Cordero [3J 49/18 50/5 57/12
Corp [lJ 45/12
o
daily [3] 60/25 60/25 61/19
damages [13J 9/7 13/18 13/23
14/2 17/7 23/3 31/9 31/15
49/2 52/16 64/16 76/17 77/11
Daniel [1] 35/23
dare [2J 69/25 69/25
date [3J 31/16 61/5 65/25
dated [lJ 36/14
dates [2J 43/23 61/13
DAVID [lJ 2/18
D
discrimination
(lO]
44/16
48/6
down
[1]
17/25
disturbs
{ll
Dr.
DIV [1]
1/2
diverse
[1]
70/14
Luke's
[4]
36/17
37/3
40/25 53/25
20/3
dragged
[2}
72/20
73/10
favors [1]
40/8
fear [2J 69/20 70/8
evidenced [1] 73/10
fearful [1] 54/5
evidentiary
{ll
19/8
February [lJ 1/18
exactly [7] 14/14 21/3 25/20
federal [1] 6/9
28/5 59/7 66/4 77/21
feedback [3J 54/20 54/23
examination [1]
19/11
59/23
examples [3] 61/11 66/10
feet [2J 21/21 21/22
70/25
felt [lJ 47/18
except [2J 16/6 18/23
female [lJ 54/2
exclusive
[5]
14/2 28/7 28/7
few [3] 22/12 71/23 75/12
29/12 37/5
field [1] 49/19
exclusivity
{6]
4/12 15/23
fifth [4J 44/24 45/3 45/17
29/19 30/3 30/17 31/10
58/3
Excuse [1] 57/18
Figueroa [lJ 2/8
executive
[2]
35/23
68/23
file [2J 61/16 78/13
exercise {ll
63/20
filed [6J 23/18 24/8 35/13
exert
{ll
71/7
51/11 62/7 74/18
exerted
[1]
77/2
filing [lJ 76/10
exist [lJ 58/9
find [2J 56/12 72/11
existed
[1]
65/17
fine [2J 23/14 43/3
existence (1] 56/10
finish [lJ 17/2
expense [1] 36/22
finished [lJ 39/13
expired [1] 14/18
firm [lJ 69/2
explain [lJ 28/3
first [22J 4/1 4/5 5/5 8/17
explained [lJ 53/1
18/6 20/24 23/2 35/6 39/2
explicit [1] 14/24
41/7 41/9 41/23 42/1 43/12
explicitly [lJ 47/21
45/6 50/17 51/17 51/20 56/18
expressly [lJ 36/16
57/22 60/7 70/18
extensively
[1] 31/23
fit [2J 38/7 65/13
extortive [1]
68/2
five [3J 42/13 49/7 63/10
extraordinary
[2] 23/1 24/24
flaws [1] 60/3
extraterritorialrl1
58/19
Floor [1] 2/3
focus [2] 43/21 52/24
F
focused [1] 43/6
face [5J 11/17 12/3 27/23
focuses [1]
53/2
37/18 58/15
following [2J 1/22 23/4
face--and [1)
11/17
food [3J 28/13 34/9 69/2
fact [34] 6/23 6/25 7/1 7/12
footnote [2J 8/19 39/21
7/17 12/22 13/7 13/20 13/23
force [3J 29/20 30/3 31/15
13/24 17/12 17/15 19/13
forced [2J 73/12 76/12
21/10 23/15 27/16 32/4 36/13 foreclose
{ll
72/13
39/18 47/15 55/25 57/21
foreclosed [1] 44/4
58/10 58/18 60/4 68/7 68/20
foregoing [1] 78/21
72/19 72/20 73/10 74/6 75/11 forfeited [lJ 13/25
77/1 78/3
forgiveness
[1]
56/1
facts [15] 18/4 18/12 18/13
form [1] 53/19
18/14 19/9 22/8 38/9 44/15
formation [1] 65/25
44/23 53/18 64/23 64/25 66/5 formed [4] 53/8 55/3 65/21
68/20 70/15
66/17
factual {ll
50/8
formerly [lJ 45/24
fail [1] 16/4
forming [1] 53/23
failing [3] 30/19 31/18 31/21 forth [3J 49/16 49/17 52/14
failure [3] 16/6 27/3 31/16
forum [1] 72/1
fair [2J 5/16 6/15
forward [3J 15/25 38/10 69/9
fairly [2J 4/19 5/7
found [lJ 73/4
fall [4J 33/21 65/15 66/25
four [2J 6/14 42/11
67/3
fourth [5] 44/24 45/3 45/17
false [lJ 27/14
55/8 57/20
familiar
[1]
56/17
fragile [lJ 62/23
familiarity
[1]
53/13
framework [1] 35/15
family's [lJ 70/11
frankly [6] 6/6 11/9 15/8
famous [1] 27/14
18/3 20/8 40/16
fantastical
[2]
1S/l 19/5
fraudulent [lJ 68/4
fantasy [2J 18/5 19/13
frightened [1] 69/23
far [7J 55/19 61/12 64/5
front [2J 3/6 66/13
65/21 65/24 66/18 68/12
fulfill [3J 26/6 30/5 30/7
fashion
[1]
26/8
full [3J 31/15 67/23 69/8
fast [lJ 69/2
fundamental [1] 60/3
fat [lJ 67/5
further [lJ 4/21
Father [2J 55/9 55/11
furtherance [2] 31/25 52/16
favor [3] 13/18 40/9 41/1
furthered [1] 67/21
favorable [2J 62/19 75/11
furthers [1] 67/14
G
G-E-R-A-G-O-S [lJ 5/10
gave [1] 23/5
gender [16J 42/16 48/21 48/24
49/15 50/4 50/8 57/12 57/13
57/21 58/13 58/14 65/7 68/16
74/22 74/24 74/25
gender-motivated
[6] 42/16
48/21 49/15 50/8 58/13 74/25
general [3J 53/18 71/9 72/23
generally [2J 43/5 67/12
generated [3J 7/4 20/19 20/20
generating [1] 20/22
genuinely [1] 70/5
GERAGOS [4J 2/6 2/6 2/9 5/10
get [19] 11/1 11/3 14/17
14/20 18/9 19/10 19/10 26/22
27/9 27/11 32/4 36/24 38/24
39/16 44/19 53/20 64/18 72/9
72/10
gets [lJ 11/2
getting [lJ 70/12
GIBSON [2J 2/11 35/1
girls [2] 65/5 65/11
give [6J 13/18 17/24 39/14
60/20 64/23 70/16
given [8] 7/21 12/22 21/2
22/10 22/24 29/18 40/9 61/10
gives [2J 36/16 48/22
giving [lJ 51/9
glad [2] 8/1 8/4
GLANDIAN [2] 2/10 59/20
go [17J 4/23 11/3 19/5 21/2
27/4 27/4 30/12 31/14 34/1
41/7 41/9 46/18 47/8 56/11
66/9 67/20 71/21
goes [9] 4/20 21/1 28/9 65/4
66/18 68/12 72/16 74/6 77/12
going [39J 6/3 8/16 8/17 10/9
10/23 11/3 16/5 16/6 16/10
16/17 16/18 16/19 16/20
17/13 17/14 17/14 17/21
17/24 19/14 22/14 23/22 26/3
27/7 30/6 30/12 32/4 36/22
40/7 46/15 59/25 61/1 65/2
65/3 65/4 66/25 70/1 70/3
78/11 78/12
gone [lJ 39/23
good [7J 3/2 7/10 33/24 34/25
52/21 59/19 66/24
got [6] 11/24 17/16 19/20
21/12 33/22 33/22
GOTTWALD [42J 1/3 1/12 3/12
3/16 3/22 4/1 4/19 7/7 7/11
7/17 7/18 7/22 10/18 12/17
12/18 18/19 20/19 21/17
22/16 22/19 22/23 24/14
24/19 36/11 36/13 39/22
40/11 41/10 41/11 41/18 43/7
43/8 43/19 50/21 54/7 54/8
58/6 60/15 61/22 67/16 67/25
72/1
Gottwald's [4J 28/11 40/13
50/3 76/15
grant [2] 5/22 78/8
grsnted [2] 4/4 46/12
great [1] 47/14
ground [lJ 50/11
grounded [lJ 37/7
grounds [1] 49/25
group [1] 28/15
groups [2J 43/3 60/1
G
~'ess '11
76/25
(1]
70/16
inapplicable
[2]
44/15 44/22
inappropriate
(1]
34/13
INC [2J 1/3 1/13
incendiary
[1]
59/17
(3]
75/12
inclined
[1]
inc1.uded
[1]
64/11
65/22
78/8
64/7
[3] 31/16 66/13
including
67/19
inclusive [1] 1/14
income [1] 7/3
inconsistent
(2) 29/15 31/24
incorporate
[2]
45/19
48/12
Incorporated [1] 3/13
incorrect [1] 47/9
independent [2) 49/25 55/15
Index [1) 1/5
indicated [1] 36/21
individuals [1] 58/16
inducement [lJ 68/4
industry [4) 6/21 6/23 15/20
22/13
inference (2) 62/19 71/15
inferences [1] 75/11
infliction [3] 42/18 50/14
59/5
information [2]
53/22
69/10
initial [2) 25/6 65/22
initially [3) 18/24 71/25
73/13
injunction
[29]
4/11
4/20
5/S
74/4 76/17
iasue--and
[lJ
4/22
injunction ...
[26]
7/24
8/12
issued [lJ
40/18
9/10 9/18 9/19 10/16 15/14
issues [6] 6/4 20/14 21/18
23/1 24/25 27/23 32/7 32/10
48/9 54/19 71/20
34/13 34/14 34/21 35/5 35/10 i.ssui.ng [1]
23/1
35/16 37/17 37/18 38/10 39/5 it [124]
40/4 41/4 52/8 56/21
it's [65] 3/7 3/11 4/1 4/5
injunctions [1]
40/18
4/8 4/19 4/22 4/22 4/24 5/13
injury [1] 20/23
6/2 6/15 7f2
8/6 10/8 10/8
instance [1]
67/24
11/7 14/16 15/21 16/14 19/5
instances [4] 60/5 60/23 61/1
20/17 27/5 28/7 28/10 28/10
63/10
29/10 29/25 30/11 32/2 32/12
instant [1]
61/16
33/16 34/4 36/21 40/16 40/17
instead (1]
44/13
41/16 43/25 44/3 44/7 50/22
instinct [1]
16/11
51/24 55/14 55/16 57/9 60/5
instruct [1]
66/14
60/15 63/4 63/14 63/24 64/17
intentional
[3]
42/18
50/14
64/20 66/2 67/3 67/6 69/5
59/4
70/4 70/7 70/8 72/3 72/8
interactions
[8]
50/25
51/10
74/13 74/13 78/1 78/2
51/10 63/16 63/18 66/11
its [11] 3/21 11/16 11/16
70/24 71/17
12/10 16/14 16/14 27/23
interchangeable [1]
12/19
28/24 37/18 58/15 73/14
interest [18] 6/7 8/8 11/21
itself [4] 8/19 9/18 47/9
11/24 16/14 16/15 16/23
60/21
16/24 17/16 17/17 37/3 37/3
Iwankow [1]
45/12
37/8 67/14 67/22 69/1 69/5
Iwankowv [1]
45/12
69/12
interested
[2]
39/3 47/13
interestingly
[1]
5/19
interface [3]
37/13
37/14
40/11
internationally
[2]
11/20
20/13
interpretation
(1]
51/22
interrelated [1] 4/19
intertwine {ll
68/11
intertwined (1] 47/17
intimate (1]
53/12
into [22] 3/4 4/23 14/17
24/23 25/2 28/9 30/4 32/4
47/8 53/20 60/1 61/17 61/24
64/18 66/25 67/3 68/1 70/12
71/6 72/20 73/10 75/18
invalidate
(2]
34/2 34/4
invalidating
[1] 47/16
invested [3] 13/2 16/16 36/3
investiture [1]
33/24
investment
(4]
11/25
11/25
19/3 22/14
invoke
involve
[1]
{3]
59/14
3/17
involved [3]
involvement
26/7
41/25
4/8 68/19
[8]
7/16
68/19
7/20
[1)
37/22
irreconcilable
[1]
52/15
irrelevant
[3]
11/4 11/6 11/7
irreparable
[19]
5/20 5/23
6/4 6/12 6/23 9/23 10/24
20/23 26/9 32/14 32/15 32/15
33/9 33/18 34/19 36/2 40/8
40/12 40/14
is [266]
isn't [6J 17/13 20/19 22/3
62/12 62/13 68/5
isolated
[1]
72/25
issue [21] 4/22 4/22 7/6 9/7
9/24 22/3 22/4 22/5 22/21
22/22 24/22 25/10 47/21 56/2
56/3 56/4 60/11 67/4 70/14
K
KADY [1] 2/14
KASZ [6] 1/3 1/12 3/13 24/14
25/2 25/5
keep [2] 6/24 24/17
Kemo [1] 26/16
KEMOSABE [68] 1/13 1/13 2/12
3/14 3/21 3/22 4/7 6/4 7/11
11/17 12/8 12/10 18/10 18/21
18/24 22/15 22/19 24/15
24/20 25/4 25/16 25/18 25/19
25/23 26/3 26/17 28/13 28/14
L
label [5] 25/4 25/16 26/17
28/14 32/19
lack [4] 48/7 70/15 70/15
71/22
language [1] 58/23
large [2] 10/8 10/9
largely [3] 43/6 43/21 44/14
last [8] 4/5 14/11 14/12
14/15 39/13 41/23 42/1 61/21
late [1] 43/15
latter [1] 24/22
law [19) 6/9 15/3 "15/11 15/12
15/24 18/4 31/22 32/13 37/18
38/9 42/5 42/9 42/14 45/1
45/2 45/4 48/19 59/16 69/2
laws [3] 46/16 56/25 68/14
lawsuit [4] 37/2 61/16 62/7
71/25
lawyer [4J 14/25 16/22 19/21
19/23
lawyers [4] 14/23 14/25 14/25
15/1
leading [lJ 62/21
least [4J 37/4 60/11 63/4
66/1
leave [3] 6/10 78/6 78/9
left [1] 27/7
legal [6] 2/19 20/24 26/1
26/1 26/5 69/16
legally [2] 13/25 23/2
40/25 53/25
lurid (1) 17/22
lvrics [31 65/3 66/24
{ll
72/22
o
otherwise [1] 22/2
our [lB] 31/10 31/23 33/21
34/8 37/2 37/3 40/22 40/22
45/22 46/4 46/11 49/12 51/18
52/14 53/14 5B/21 60/15
70/1B
ourselves [1]
72/11
out [30] 7/22 B/16 B/17 9/9
10/11 10/14 11/1 14/2 14/4
14/5 17/14 1B/9 22/7 27/9
2B/16 29/14 32/20 33/15 35/3
36/8 37/20 3B/19 39/17 41/13
56/25 57/2 57/10 63/24 65/6
66/6
over [lBJ 16/20 22/17 25/17
45/11 60/B 60/24 61/7 61/12
63/21 67/23 67/25 71/B 71/23
72/23 73/24. 74/19 76/9 77/2
overlap [1] 60/2
oversight [2] 26/20 26/24
owes [1] 2B/24
own [6] B/20 11/16 22/15
33/17 37/1 49/21
owneel [5J 4/19 4/25 24/20
32/19 69/6
P
P.C [lJ
2/6
p/k/a [4] 1/3 1/6 1/9 1/12
package [lJ 2B/17
page [2J 1/22 B/1B
Page 16 [lJ B/18
paiel [2J 23/22 39/16
paint [lJ 18/22
pale [1] 12/2
paper [2J 20/4 21/23
papers [24] 7/9 7/10 7/1B
20/5 21/22 21/23 22/9 2B/l
31/7 33/7 38/14 41/13 45/23
46/4 46/11 46/20 49/12 52/14
56/17 56/22 5S/21 62/4 62/5
62/11
papers--anel [1] 7/9
papers--I've
[1]
7/10
Paragraph [BJ S/24 13/15 36/9
36/25 39/21 39/21 53/22
67/15
Paragraph 119 [1] 67/15
Paragraph 12 [1] 39/21
Paragraph 15 [2] 36/9 36/25
Paragraph 48 [ll 53/22
Paragraph 6 [2]
B/24 13/15
Parelon [1] B/3
Park [1] 2/13
part [lB] 1/2 10/23 10/24
15/1 26/7 34/22 42/3 52/B
61/14 70/23 70/24 71/3 71/16
72/8 73/21 73/25 77/4 7B/8
particular
[1] 56/14
parti.cularly
[2J 12/22 68/17
parties [9] 15/20 37/6 37/20
39/7 45/1S 4S/10 51/23 7B/12
78/13
party [6J B/25 30/19 40/6
40/23 46/23 59/8
pattern
{ll
75/13
"."'otinl"r
refused
5 3 '23
R
R.P.R [lJ 1/24
raised [5] 32/8 47/15 71/20
72/14 74/3
raises [1]
74/3
ranking [1] 66/19
rape [2] 49/8 63/5
rather [3] 25/23 43/20 47/24
RCA [3] 25/3 36/10 36/14
reach [2J 55/19 59/4
reached [2] 50/22 50/23
reaching [1)
47/21
read [3] 21/21 47/13 69/22
reading [2] 7/9 21/20
real [4J 22/22 37/7 46/19
65/14
reality [1] 18/2
really [15] 4/5 4/7 4/8 9/9
10/15 11/10 15/14 25/10
35/14 38/21 40/16 40/24
63/23 66/6 68/20
reaaon [4J 18/8 22/7 23/5
40/24
[2]
37/1
37/23
refusing [1]
30/19
regard [2J 48/11 70/13
regarding [1 J
51/21
regular [1] 66/10
rehab [6] 61/17 61/24 75/18
76/2 76/13 76/14
reinforced [1] 63/17
reject [2] 23/8 23/16
rejected [2] 23/10 23/17
related [3] 42/9 57/8 67/23
relationship [18] 19/3 19/4
25/8 25/10 25/21 55/12 57/1
57/24 60/9 60/24 63/17 66/16
67/1 67/7 68/7 70/24 71/4
73/9
relationships [2] 26/6 39/6
relied [1] 34/9
relief [14] 15/15 24/25 34/12
34/16 40/16 40/17 40/19
40/20 56/18 72/6 72/9 73/21
73/25 74/1
relieved [1]
33/25
relinquished
[1] 31/10
rely [2J 37/21 69/20
relying [1] 57/22
remain {ll
30/9
remainder [1] 43/20
remaina [5J 6/25 13/24 19/13
31/15 36/12
restaurant [lJ
69/3
result [1] 76/17
retribution
[1] 27/15
review [1]
75/10
rewrite [1] 30/10
rewriting
[2]
25/1
25/7
right [30] 3/4 6/5 6/25 8/24
9/3 10/22 11/23 12/20 13/15
13/18 13/25 15/16 24/21 25/6
26/18 29/6 29/21 29/24 33/1
37/24 39/22 42/25 51/2 52/1
52/4 54/14 59/6 74/5 75/20
77/7
righta [10] 34/1 42/5 42/9
45/1 45/2 45/3 47/22 48/19
56/25 68/14
rise [4J 48/22 51/6 51/8 51/9
ROBERT [2] 1/24 78/23
robust [1] 35/25
Rocords [1] 2/12
room {ll
43/13
ROSE [3] 1/6 1/9 2/8
routinely [2J 61/13 71/16
Rover [1] 17/9
ROVNER [lJ 1/7
royalties [1] 31/17
RPR [1] 78/23
14/23
15/19
significant
{ll
77/9
speculation
speculative
22/9 27/3
speculations
30/11
[4]
[1]
(1]
13/5
18/5
13/7
standpoint
[1]
20/11
19/16
[1]
17/25
statute [32]
44/19 44/23
48/25 49/8
50/7 50/16
54/18 57/4
58/22 58/24
72/16 74/10
statutes
[13]
44/14
46/6
[1]
42/23
[1]
12/25
Street [3]
strike
[4]
4/3
(1]
[4]
70/2
25/12 28/9 28/10
59/15
70/2
70/3
strikes
studio
38/24
subclass [1) 49/21
subject [6] 45/10 45/15 46/25
48/4 48/7 71/23
submit [6] 44/22 46/22 48/2
50/25 51/5 51/8
subsequent
[1]
43/20
[1]
24/21
substantial
[1]
50/S
substantially
[1]
33/23
substantiate
[1]
50/10
succeed
{1]
37/S
succeeding
[1]
8/8
success
[9]
9/20 27/17
sub~idiary
31/8
30/11
(1]
50/19
78/2
third [5] 8/25 48/14 48/18
57/8 70/3
third-party [IJ 8/25
this [154]
those [24] 3/23 10/11 12/21
15/8 17/10 20/5 20/14 27/13
28/12 33/20 34/9 34/10 41/13
46/13 48/12 57/5 61/11 64/5
64/6 64/10 65/19 68/3 68/20
75/3
though [5J 11/18 21/25 24/2
44/19 72/14
thought [2J 70/21 76/5
thoughts [1] 61/18
thread [1] 22/23
threatened [1] 69/24
threatening {4]
62/24 63/1
63/25 76/12
threats [3] 43/21 43/24 63/24
three [13] 3/6 6/14 6/16 6/17
6/18 12/23 30/24 42/8 48/5
55/3 57/4 57/5 58/1
three-year [2J 57/4 58/1
threshold [2] 46/23 47/7
through [9J 25/3 27/4 35/22
39/16 39/23 56/11 56/15
64/11 69/19
throughout [4] 22/22 63/15
64/21 75/13
thrown [lJ 29/9
ties [lJ 73/4
till [lJ 76/6
time [16] 14/13 20/23 30/15
36/1 39/13 56/10 56/21 58/7
58/9 62/2 62/6 62/7 62/25
70/15 74/18 76/9
times [3] 23/11 49/22 68/19
TINA [2] 2/10 59/19
today [4] 23/16 43/10 43/11
62/17
together [1] 63/15
toilet [1] 29/9
told [4] 54/4 66/23 67/4
69/25
toll [1] 77/9
tolling [3] 77/13 77/17 77/18
too [1] 67/5
took [3] 54/12 60/23 77/9
tort [l1J 15/4 15/6 15/7 15/9
15/11 42/23 49/21 63/12 69/3
74/16 77/8
tortious [1]
67/21
torts [1] 44/6
totally [1] 27/15
touring [1]
38/17
towards [1] 54/1
tracking [1] 50/6
tracks [5] 8/21 9/4 9/13 21/8
29/13
trajectory
[1]
27/18
transcript [1] 78/21
transcripts [1] 69/21
transfer (2]
25/6
34/8
transferred [1] 25/5
transfers
(2J
34/3
34/10
trap [lJ 68/1
trauma [1] 22/1
treat [1] 60/4
treating [1]
71/11
trial [2] 9/7 13/18
tried [4] 14/17 14/19 36/24
38/24
T
true [3) 31/11 50/9 78/21
try (3) 44/12 59/24 59/25
trying (4) 21/6 68/6 70/9
73/23
tune [1] 12/5
turn [4] 37/18 48/14 50/12
54/24
two [26J 9/13 15/20 17/18
19/7 30/23 31/3 33/17 33/20
37/20 42/4 43/6 44/5 44/6
50/1 51/7 51/14 51/19 51/23
53/1 60/5 60/23 64/11 70/2
72/25 75/15 78/11
type [lJ 64/15
types (3) 53/15 64/8 64/16
tvoica1 [11 15/21
u
u1timate [3] 40/16 40/17
40/19
ultimately [3J 26/5 30/6
32/18
umbrella [lJ 37/11
under (47) 3/24 4/1 4/6 15/11
22/1 23/20 23/23 23/25 24/3
25/16 25/17 26/21 26/21
26/23 32/13 34/5 34/15 36/18
37/11 38/9 42/11 42/13 42/15
44/25 45/2 45/3 46/6 47/22
48/6 48/18 48/20 49/8 54/5
55/4 55/5 55/6 58/4 65/13
65/16 66/3 66/3 70/8 72/6
72/11 74/15 77/5 77/7
undercut (2] 33/8 40/22
underpinning
[2] 31/8 32/10
[13]
39/6
42/10
w
wait (3) 14/21 68/3 70/2
waived [6] 31/12 31/21 32/12
46/25 47/2 72/15
walk [lJ 56/15
want (16) 5/8 5/18 7/1 14/1
17/3 18/9 22/14 22/20 29/23
30/19 36/19 39/13 39/13
51/14 65/3 70/20
wsnted (2) 8/2 8/5
wants [5J 7/15 17/5 19/9 41/7
64/6
was {134]
wasn't
(aJ
17/8
17/9
53/8
unrelated
we [121)
understand
[11]
[1]
16/2
20/9
68/25
unsatisfaotory
[1] 43/23
unsupported [2] 27/13 32/17
until [7J 53/9 62/6 66/1
76/10 77/8 77/10 77/13
up [17J 3/3 9/15 9/17 13/18
16/4 16/6 23/4 24/17 25/3
28/13 29/19 30/6 34/10 53/21
59/1 59/24 62/21
upon (5) 17/4 18/4 47/9 51/12
53/22
upstream (ll
25/5
urge [lJ 59/14
use (1) 66/25
used [lJ 67/25
usuallv [11 68/25
we'd
[1]
73/12
21/3
29/4
56/22
62/15
w
won't [5J 7/23 11/14 20/11
21/8 22/20
words [3] 15/15 25/21 75/4
work [30] 7/2 7/7 7/14 7/14
7/15 7/23 9/24 10/1 10/2
12/1 13/2 13/7 13/10 13/11
13/12 13/13 21/17 22/10
22/18 22/19 22/23 22/24
27/11 29/20 29/23 32/16
33/12 36/13 36/19 77/3
worked [1] 67/18
working [1] 63/15
workplace [1]
55/17
works [3] 12/14 28/8 59/22
world [2J 18/1 18/2
worse [1]
64/1
would [67] 5/5 5/18 6/20 6/22
9/12 10/10 12/25 13/14 14/18
15/2 15/3 17/15 19/6 19/17
19/19 19/20 20/14 23/19
23/25 24/2 25/15 26/8 26/13
26/15 26/17 26/19 26/20
26/20 26/22 26/24 33/8 34/21
36/3 36/23 37/17 38/12 39/4
40/1 44/6 44/9 44/10 45/19
46/12 47/8 47/18 49/9 50/9
51/6 52/7 58/19 59/14 64/8
64/9 64/9 65/2 66/9 66/14
66/25 70/25 71/1 71/1 71/2
71/7 76/1 78/5 78/7 78/9
wouldn't [2] 6/19 51/8
write (1]
60/17
writing [1]
78/14
wrong [2J 32/13 45/11
wronas
[1]
73/23
Y
year [21] 44/4 44/7 44/13
48/25 49/14 50/16 51/1 51/11
57/4 57/14 58/1 58/22 59/5
60/9 60/24 61/7 61/12 69/19
73/2 75/8 76/9
yesrs [9] 17/19 33/17 33/24
49/7 55/3 69/8 69/21 73/24
75/15
yes [31] 4/16 5/3 11/14 16/19
20/6 24/18 28/3 28/23 29/1
29/3 30/25 32/24 33/2 33/3
33/4 39/25 43/2 44/10 45/14
46/2 46/17 48/16 51/16 54/11
54/22 55/2 55/10 55/11 60/22
65/21 75/17
YORK [60] 1/1 1/2 1/17 1/17
2/4 2/18 14/18 14/20 14/22
15/2 15/3 15/12 18/14 29/17
30/21 42/5 42/8 42/11 42/14
42/15 44/17 44/18 44/25
44/25 45/2 45/3 45/9 45/9
45/10 45/23 47/18 47/22 48/6
48/19 48/20 49/1 49/13 49/16
49/18 49/20 49/23 56/25 57/3
57/25 58/4 58/14 58/18 71/24
72/10 72/11 72/12 72/17
72/20 72/21 72/24 73/4 73/7
73/9 73/11 74/7
York's
[1]
31/22
you [144J
you'd [1] 47/4
you're [57] 6/1 6/7 6/12 7/24
8/11 8/13 9/15 9/17 11/12
11/15 12/2 12/8 14/7 15/14
Z
ZACHARY [1] 2/14
zero [1] 30/9
Zucker [3] 35/23 35/24 36/8
Zucker's [1]
36/25