U X P

*OUFSBDUJPO
5IF
*OGSBTUSVDUVSF
GPS

4PDJBM
*OTUJUVUJPOT
UIF
/BUVSBM

&DPMPHJDBM
/JDIF
GPS
-BOHVBHF

BOE
UIF
"SFOB
JO
XIJDI
$VMUVSF
JT

&OBDUFE
-UIV]MT);KPMOTWNN

HECENTRALTHEMEOFMYCONTRIBUTIONTOTHISVOLUMEISTHATINTERACTION
ISTHEPRIMARYFUNDAMENTALEMBODIMENTOFSOCIALITYWHAT)HAVE
CALLEDELSEWHERED hTHEPRIMORDIALSITEOFSOCIALITYv&ROMTHIS
POINTOFVIEWTHEhROOTSOFHUMANSOCIALITYvREFERSTOTHOSEFEATURESOF
THEORGANIZATIONOFHUMANINTERACTIONTHATPROVIDETHEmEXIBILITYAND
ROBUSTNESSTHATALLOWSITTOSUPPLYTHEINFRASTRUCTURETHATSUPPORTSTHE
OVERALLORMACROSTRUCTUREOFSOCIETIESINTHESAMESENSETHATROADSAND
RAILWAYSSERVEASINFRASTRUCTUREFORTHEECONOMYANDTHATGROUNDSALL
OFTHETRADITIONALLYRECOGNIZEDINSTITUTIONSOFSOCIETIESANDTHELIVESOF
THEIRMEMBERS
)FONEREmECTSONTHECONCRETEACTIVITIESTHATMAKEUPTHESEABSTRACTLY
NAMEDINSTITUTIONSTHEECONOMYTHEPOLITYANDTHEINSTITUTIONSFOR
THEREPRODUCTIONOFTHESOCIETYCOURTSHIPMARRIAGEFAMILYSOCIALIZA
TIONANDEDUCATION THELAWRELIGIONANDSOFORTHITTURNSOUTTHAT
INTERACTIONANDTALKININTERACTIONlGURECENTRALLYINTHEM7HEN
THEMOSTPOWERFULMACROSTRUCTURESOFSOCIETYFAILANDCRUMBLEASEG
AFTER THE DEMISE OF THE COMMUNIST REGIMES IN %ASTERN %UROPE  THE
SOCIALSTRUCTURETHATISLEFTISINTERACTIONINALARGELYUNAFFECTEDSTATE
0EOPLETALKINTURNSWHICHCOMPOSEORDERLYSEQUENCESTHROUGHWHICH



)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

COURSESOFACTIONAREDEVELOPEDTHEYDEALWITHTRANSIENTPROBLEMSOF
SPEAKINGHEARINGORUNDERSTANDINGTHETALKANDRESETTHEINTERACTION
ONITSCOURSETHEYORGANIZETHEMSELVESSOASTOALLOWSTORIESTOBETOLD
THEY lLL OUT OCCASIONS OF INTERACTION FROM APPROACHES AND GREETINGS
THROUGHTOCLOSUREANDPARTINANORDERLYWAY)MENTIONTHISHERETO
BRINGTOTHEFOREFRONTOFATTENTIONWHATRESTSONTHEBACKOFINTERACTION
THEORGANIZATIONOFINTERACTIONNEEDSTOBEANDISROBUSTENOUGH
mEXIBLEENOUGHANDSUFlCIENTLYSELF MAINTAININGTOSUSTAINSOCIALORDER
ATFAMILYDINNERSANDINCOALMININGPITSAROUNDTHESURGICALOPERATING
TABLEANDONSKIDROWIN.EW9ORK#ITYAND-ONTENEGROAND2OSSEL
)SLANDANDSOFORTHINEVERYNOOKANDCRANNYWHEREHUMANLIFEISTO
BEFOUND
!CCORDINGLYMYPLANISTOSKETCHTHECONTOURSOFHALFADOZENGENE
RIC ORGANIZATIONS OF PRACTICE CENTRAL TO THE CONDUCT OF INTERACTION
AND MORE SPECIlCALLY THAT FORM OF INTERACTION THAT IS DISTINCTIVE TO
HUMANSTALKININTERACTION"YREFERRINGTOTHEMASGENERIC)MEANTO
CONVEYTHATWHERESTABLETALKININTERACTIONISSUSTAINEDSOLUTIONSTO
KEYORGANIZATIONALPROBLEMSAREINOPERATIONANDTHESEORGANIZATIONS
OF PRACTICEARE THEBASISFORTHESE SOLUTIONS !FTER SKETCHINGSOMEOF
THESEBASICORGANIZATIONSOFPRACTICE)TURNTOSOMEOFTHEQUERIESOUR
EDITORSHAVEPUTBEFOREUSINMYCASEEACHOFTHEMWOULDREQUIREA
BOOKANDWILLNEEDTOBETREATEDINAFEWPARAGRAPHS

'ENERIC0ROBLEMSAND0RACTICED 3OLUTIONS
!LTHOUGHITISALMOSTCERTAINLYTHECASETHATMANYIMPORTANTORGANIZA
TIONAL PROBLEMS OF TALK IN INTERACTION AND THEIR SOLUTIONS ARE AS YET
UNKNOWNLETALONEUNDERSTOODITAPPEARSTHATTHEFOLLOWINGONESWILL
HAVEACONTINUINGCLAIMONRESEARCHERSATTENTION

4HEh4URN TAKINGv0ROBLEM7HOSHOULD4ALKOR-OVEOR!CT.EXT
ANDWHENSHOULDTHEYDOSO(OWDOESTHIS!FFECTTHE#ONSTRUCTION
AND5NDERSTANDINGOFTHE4URNSOR!CTS4HEMSELVES
3OFARITSEEMSTOBETHECASETHATWHEREVERINVESTIGATORSHAVELOOKED
CAREFULLYTALKININTERACTIONISORGANIZEDTOBEDONEONESPEAKERATA
TIME!CHIEVINGANDMAINTAININGSUCHASTATEOFTALKMAYPROMPTTHE
INVOCATIONOFCONVENTIONALIZEDARRANGEMENTSLIKEACHAIRTOALLOCATETHE
TURNSORMAPPINGTHEORDEROFTURNALLOCATIONONTOORDEREDFEATURESOF
THECANDIDATEPARTICIPANTSSUCHASRELATIVESTATUS!LBERT "UTTHE
lRSTOFTHESEMARKSTHESETTINGASINSTITUTIONALLYORCEREMONIALLYDISTINCT



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

FROMhORDINARYTALKvANDTHELATTERENGENDERSARANGEOFPROBLEMSTHAT
MAKEITUNSUSTAINABLEASAGENERALORGANIZATIONOFINTERACTION7HAT
IS AT STAKE IN hTURN TAKINGv IS NOT POLITENESS OR CIVILITY BUT THE VERY
POSSIBILITYOFCOORDINATEDCOURSESOFACTIONBETWEENTHEPARTICIPANTS
EGALLOWINGFORINITIATIVEANDRESPONSE VERYHIGHSTAKESINDEED
%VEN WITH JUST TWO PARTICIPANTS ACHIEVING ONE AT A TIME POSES A
PROBLEMOFCOORDINATIONIFTHETALKISTOBEWITHOUTRECURRENTSUBSTANTIAL
SILENCES AND OVERLAPS HOW TO COORDINATE THE ENDING OF ONE SPEAKER
AND THE STARTING UP BY ANOTHER )F THERE ARE MORE THAN TWO hRATIlED
PARTICIPANTSv'OFFMAN THEREISTHEADDITIONALISSUEOFHAVING
ATLEASTONEOFTHECURRENTNONSPEAKERSANDNOTMORETHANONEOFTHE
CURRENTNONSPEAKERSSTARTUPONCOMPLETIONOFTHECURRENTSPEAKERS
TURN/NECANIMAGINEAVARIETYOFPUTATIVESOLUTIONSTOTHESEPROBLEMS
OFCOORDINATIONBUTNONEOFTHEMCANBERECONCILEDWITHTHEDATAOF
ACTUALNATURALLYOCCURRINGORDINARYCONVERSATION3CHEGLOFFNDA
4HESIMPLESTSYSTEMATICSFORTURNTAKINGARTICLEBY3ACKSETAL
SKETCHESANORGANIZATIONOFPRACTICESTHATWORKSWELLANDHASLEDTO
NONINTUITIVEENHANCEMENTS3CHEGLOFFB )TDESCRIBESUNITS
AND PRACTICES FOR CONSTRUCTING TURNS AT TALK PRACTICES FOR ALLOCATING
TURNSATTALKANDASETOFPRACTICESTHATINTEGRATESTHETWO3OFARTHIS
ACCOUNT WORKS ACROSS QUITE A WIDE RANGE OF SETTINGS LANGUAGES AND
CULTURES $EPARTURES FROM INTERACTIONAL FORMATS FAMILIAR TO 7ESTERN
INDUSTRIALIZEDNATIONSINVOLVEWHATMIGHTBECALLEDhDIFFERENCESINTHE
VALUESOFVARIABLESvFOREXAMPLEDIFFERENTLENGTHSOFTIMETHATCOUNT
ASASILENCERATHERTHANDIFFERENCESINTHEUNDERLYINGORGANIZATIONOF
PRACTICES
4OGIVEABRIEFEXAMPLETHEREMAYBEDIFFERENCESBETWEENCULTURESOR
SUBCULTURESINWHATTHEUNMARKEDVALUEOFASILENCEBETWEENTHEENDOF
ONETURNANDTHESTARTOFANEXTSHOULDBE,EAVINGLESSTHANTHENORMATIVE
hBEATv OF SILENCE OR MORE THAN THAT CAN ENGENDER INFERENCES AMONG
PARTIESTOTHECONVERSATIONSTARTINGANEXTTURNhEARLYvORSTARTINGANEXT
TURNhLATEvAREWAYSOFDOINGTHINGSININTERACTIONANDCONVERSATION
BETWEENPEOPLEFROMDIFFERENTCULTURALSETTINGSCANRESULTINMISlRING
WITHONEANOTHER&OREXAMPLEONEDIFFERENCEOFTENREMARKEDONBY
URBANMETROPOLITANPEOPLEABOUTRURALORINDIGENOUSPEOPLEISTHAT
THEYSEEMTOBEDIMWITTEDANDSOMEWHATHOSTILECOMMENTSRANGEFROM
-ARXONTHEhIDIOCYOFTHERURALCLASSESvTO2ON3COLLANAND3UZANNE
3COLLANSWORK ONTHERELATIONBETWEENMIGRANTSFROMTHEhLOWER
vSTATESINTHE5NITED3TATESAND!LASKA.ATIVES(AVINGASKEDTHEM
AQUESTIONTHEURBANITESORSHOULD)SAYURBANE ITESlNDTHEMSELVES
NOT GETTING A TIMELY REPLY AND SENSE RESISTANCE NONUNDERSTANDING

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

NONFORTHCOMINGNESSANDSOFORTH/FTENTHEYBREAKWHATTHEYPERCEIVE
AShTHESILENCEvTHATGREETEDTHEIRQUESTIONWITHAFOLLOW UPQUESTION
WHICHMAYBETAKENBYTHEIRINTERLOCUTORTOEXEMPLIFYTHEHIGH PRESSURE
AGGRESSIVENESSOFhCITYSLICKERSv"UTWHATDIFFERSBETWEENTHEMISNOT
THATTHEIRTURN TAKINGPRACTICESAREDIFFERENTORDIFFERENTLYORGANIZED
BUTTHEWAYTHEYhRECKONvTHEINVISIBLENORMATIVEBEATBETWEENONE
TURNANDTHENEXT
)HAVEJUSTPOINTEDATTHEORGANIZATIONOFTURNTAKINGANACCOUNT
OFWHATTHATORGANIZATIONISANDHOWITWORKSWILLHAVETOBESOUGHT
OUTINTHEBY NOWSUBSTANTIALLITERATUREADDRESSEDTOTHOSEMATTERSCF
ESP,ERNER 

4HEh3EQUENCE ORGANIZATIONALv0ROBLEM(OWARE3UCCESSIVE4URNS
OR!CTIONS&ORMEDUPTOBEh#OHERENTvWITHTHE0RIORONEORSOME
0RIORONE AND#ONSTITUTEAh#OURSEOF!CTIONv7HATISTHE.ATURE
OFTHAT#OHERENCE
4HEMOSTCOMMONWAYRESEARCHERSHAVEADDRESSEDACTUALSPATESOFTALK
HASBEENTOASKWHATITISABOUTANDHOWMOVEMENTFROMONEhTOPICvTO
ANOTHEROCCURSANDWHATITREVEALSABOUTTHEINTENTIONSANDMEANINGS
BEINGCONVEYEDBYTHESPEAKERORTHESEVERALPARTICIPANTS4ALKINGABOUT
THINGShDOINGTOPICTALKvISSURELYONEOBSERVABLEFEATUREOFTALKIN
INTERACTION"UTITISONLYONEOFTHETHINGSPEOPLEDOINTALKININTER
ACTION7EWOULDDOWELLTOOPENINQUIRYTOTHEFULLRANGEOFTHINGSTHAT
PEOPLEDOINTHEIRTALKINGININTERACTIONASKINGREQUESTINGINVITING
OFFERING COMPLAINING REPORTING ANSWERING AGREEING DISAGREEING
ACCEPTINGREJECTINGASSESSINGANDSOFORTH)NDEEDDOINGTOPICTALKIS
ITSELFLARGELYCOMPOSEDOFSUCHDOINGSTELLINGAGREEINGDISAGREEING
ASSESSINGREJECTINGANDSOFORTH0ROCEEDINGINTHISWAYTREATSACTION
ANDCOURSESOFACTIONASTHEMOREGENERALTACKANDDOINGTOPICTALKAS
ONEOFITSVARIETIES
! COMPARABLE CONTRAST SURFACES IN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THIS VOLUME
BETWEEN WHAT MIGHT BE CALLED hMENTATIONv ON THE ONE HAND AND
hACTIONvORhPRACTICESvONTHEOTHERHAND4HEDISCOURSEISFULLOFTERMS
LIKE UNDERSTANDING KNOWING INFERRING REASONING ESTABLISHING COMMON
GROUNDINTENTIONMOTIVECONSTRUALTHEORIESEG4HEORYOF-IND;4O-= 
ANDSOFORTH"UTTHECENTRALQUESTIONISWHETHERHUMANSOCIALITYISA
MATTEROFKNOWINGTOGETHEROROFDOINGTOGETHER
!T LEAST PART OF THIS CONTRAST TURNS ON THE TERMS OF DESCRIPTION
USEDININQUIRY&OREXAMPLEONEACCOUNTOFWORKON4O-DESCRIBES
AN EXPERIMENTAL SETTING IN WHICH INFANTS lGURED OUT WHICH OF TWO



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN OBJECTS IS BEING NAMED BY DETERMINING WHICH

ONETHEINVESTIGATORnSPEAKERWASLOOKINGAT"UTWEMIGHTWELLASKWHY
THISISTREATEDASATHEORYOFMINDRATHERTHANATHEORYOFINTERACTIONAL
PRACTICESPEAKERSCANINDICATEWHATTHEYARETALKINGABOUTBYLOOKING
ATITANDRECIPIENTSCANTHEREFORELOOKINTHEDIRECTIONOFTHESPEAKERS
GAZETOlNDWHATTOLOOKATTODETERMINEWHATTHESPEAKERISREFERRING
TO)FTHISQUESTIONANDTHEISSUEUNDERLYINGITHAVEANYCOGENCYTHEY
SHOULD PROMPT EXAMINATION OF THE CONVERSATIONAL AND INTERACTIONAL
SETTINGSINWHICHSO CALLED4O-SDEVELOPWHATISSAIDTOTHECHILDREN
7HATISBEINGDONEBYWHATISBEINGSAIDTOTHEM7HATDOTHECHILDREN
SAYBACK7HATARETHEYDOINGBYSAYINGTHAT!LMOSTCERTAINLYWHAT
THECHILDRENARELEARNINGISWHATOTHERSAREDOINGANDWHATTHEYSHOULD
DOINTURN)FTHEREARETHEORIESLIKE4O-THEYAREBUILTUPFROMAND
FORCONTINGENCIESOFINTERACTIONANDTHESEARECONTINGENCIESOFACTION
ORCONDUCTNOTCONTINGENCIESOFTHEORIZING)TISTOTHEORGANIZATIONOF
ACTIONANDACTIONREALIZEDTHROUGHTALKTHATSEQUENCEORGANIZATION
ISADDRESSED
4HESTANCEEMBODIEDINTHEFOREGOINGREMARKSRESONATESHARMONIOUSLY
WITHTHECONTRIBUTIONSOF'OODWINANDOF(UTCHINSTOTHISVOLUME
MOST OBVIOUSLY IN THE SHARED PREOCCUPATION WITH PRAXIS AND THE
ACTIONnIMPLICATEDANDPUBLICLYDISPLAYEDFEATURESOFKNOWLEDGE"UT
THEYARENOTINCOMPATIBLEINPRINCIPLEWITHPSYCHOLOGICALINQUIRYONLY
INCURRENTLYPREDOMINANTOUTLOOKANDEXPRESSION&OREXAMPLE)TAKE
THE CONTRIBUTION OF 'ERGELY AND #SIBRA IN THIS VOLUME TO BE ABOUT
ACTIONANDCOURSESOFACTIONANDPRACTICESANDINTERACTIONWHICHRUNS
THROUGHTHEACCOUNTOFTHEEXPERIMENTALPROCEDUREASBEGINNINGWITH
WHATCONVERSATIONANALYSTSCALLASUMMONSnANSWERSEQUENCE3CHEGLOFF
 TOATTRACTTHEINFANTSATTENTIONANDTHATISWHATTHEIRINVOCATION
OFhPEDAGOGYvINTRODUCESTHEVERYNOTIONOFPEDAGOGYISTHROUGHAND
THROUGHINTERACTIONALINCHARACTER
)FWEASKHOWACTIONSANDCOURSESOFACTIONGETORGANIZEDINTALKIN
INTERACTIONITTURNSOUTTHATTHEREAREAFEWKERNELFORMSOFORGANIZATION
THATAPPEARTOSUPPLYTHEFORMALFRAMEWORKWITHINWHICHTHECONTEXT
SPECIlCACTUALACTIONSANDTRAJECTORIESOFACTIONARESHAPED"YFARTHE
MOSTCOMMONANDCONSEQUENTIALISTHEONEWECALLhADJACENCYPAIR
BASEDv3ACKSVOLn3CHEGLOFFINPRESS3CHEGLOFFAND3ACKS
 4HESIMPLESTANDMINIMALFORMOFASEQUENCEISTWOTURNSLONG
THElRSTINITIATINGSOMEKINDOFACTIONTRAJECTORYSUCHASREQUESTING
COMPLAININGANNOUNCINGANDTHELIKETHESECONDRESPONDINGTOTHAT
ACTION IN EITHER A COMPLIANT OR ALIGNING WAY GRANTING REMEDYING
ASSESSINGANDTHELIKERESPECTIVELY ORINAMISALIGNINGORNONCOMPLIANT

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

WAY REJECTING DISAGREEING CLAIMING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND THE LIKE

RESPECTIVELY 
!ROUND AND INSIDE SUCH hSIMPLEv PAIRS OF ACTIONS QUITE ELABORATE
EXPANSIONSCANBEFASHIONEDBYTHEPARTICIPANTS4HEREAREFOREXAMPLE
EXPANSIONSBEFORETHElRSTPARTOFSUCHAPAIRSUCHAShPREANNOUNCEMENTSv
h$IDJU HEAR WHOS COMINGv  hPREINVITATIONSv h!RE YOU DOING
ANYTHING THIS WEEKENDv  AND THE LIKE /R TO CITE ACTUAL DATA OF A
PREINVITATION
 #'.ELSONISTHECALLER#LARAISCALLEDTOTHEPHONE









#LARA
.ELSON
#LARA
.ELSON 
#LARA 
.ELSON
#LARA
.ELSON

(ELLO
(I
(I
7HATCHADOIN
.OTMUCH
9WANNADRINK
9EAH
/KAY

!NDOFAPREANNOUNCEMENT
 4ERASAKI 

*IM 
 'INNY 

*IM

9WANNAKNOWWHO)GOTSTONEDWITHAFEWHH WEEKSAGOHH

7HO
-ARY#ARTER@NHERBOYHH FRIEHH NDHH

.OTICETHATTHESEhPREvSTHEMSELVESMAKEARESPONSERELEVANTANDSO
THEMSELVESCONSTITUTEANADJACENCYPAIRANDCANTHEREFORETHEMSELVES
BEEXPANDEDEGh(EY3TEVEvh9EAHvh$IDJUHEARWHOPULLEDOUTOF
THECONFERENCEvh.OWHOv 
!NDTHERECANBEEXPANSIONSAFTERTHElRSTACTIONnTURNINANADJACENCY
PAIRANDBEFORETHERESPONDINGSECONDPARTANINSERTEDSEQUENCE&OR
EXAMPLE
 3CHEGLOFF*EFFERSONAND3ACKS 






" &B

- &I
" 3I
- 3B

7ASLASTNIGHTTHElRSTTIMEYOUMET-ISSIZ+ELLY

-ETWHOM
-ISSIZ+ELLY
9ES



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

!GAINNOTICETHATIFAlRSTPAIRPARTISNOTFOLLOWEDBYANACTIONnTURN
WHICHCOULDBEITSSECONDPAIRPARTTHENWHATOCCURSINITSPLACEIS
ITSELFAlRSTPAIRPARTANDREQUIRESARESPONSESOITTOOISANADJACENCY
PAIRANDITTOOCANGETEXPANDED
!ND AFTER THE RESPONSE TO THE INITIATING ACTIONnTURN THERE CAN BE
FURTHERTALKTHATCLEARLYISEXTENDINGTHATTRAJECTORYOFACTION3OMETIMES
THATCANBEASINGLETURNWHICHDOESNOTMAKEARESPONSETOITRELEVANT
NEXTASATLINESANDINTHEFOLLOWINGSPECIMENWHICHHASTWOSUCH
SEQUENCES
 (' 










.ANCY
(YLA
.ANCY 

.ANCY

(YLA
.ANCY 

qHHH$ZHEAVIZOWNAPART;MINT=
;qHHHH=9EAH
/H

(OWDIDJUGITIZNUMBER
q
)H q CH ALLEDINFERMATIONN3AN&RNCISSCH ;UH




;/H
q

"UTITCANALSOBESOMETHINGTHATDOESMAKEARESPONSETOITRELEVANT
NEXT SO IT TOO IS ITSELF AN ADJACENCY PAIR AND CAN TAKE THE KINDS OF
EXPANSIONS)HAVEBEENSKETCHINGHERE
 #ONNIEAND$EE

$EE
7ELLWHORYOUWORKINFOR
 #ONNIE
qHHH7ELL)MWORKINGTHROUGHTHE!MFAT#ORPORATION

$EE 
4HEWHO
 #ONNIE 
!MFAH#ORPORA;TION4SAHOLDINGCOMPANY

$EE 
;/H

$EE 
9EAH

.OTEHERETHATTHEQUESTIONnANSWERSEQUENCEATLINESnISEXPANDED
AFTER THE ANSWER BY ANOTHER AT LINES n ADDRESSING A HEARING OR
UNDERSTANDINGPROBLEM ANDTHATTHELATTERISEXPANDEDBYASINGLE
TURNEXPANSIONlRSTATLINEWHERETHEhGOTITv REGISTERINGhOHvIS
CAUGHTINOVERLAP ANDTHENAGAINATLINEWITHTHENOWhKNEWITv
REGISTERINGhYEAHv 
)HOPETHATITISCLEARTHATWHATSTARTEDASASIMPLETWOTURNnACTION
SEQUENCECANBEAFRAMEWORKTHAThCARRIESvANEXTENSIVESTRETCHOFTALK
4HEREARESOMEDEEPCONNECTIONSBETWEENWHATARENONETHELESSLARGELY
AUTONOMOUSORGANIZATIONSOFPRACTICETHEORGANIZATIONOFTURNTAKING

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

ANDTHEORGANIZATIONOFACTIONSEQUENCES*USTASINTERACTIONCANNOT
DO WITHOUT PRACTICES FOR ALLOCATING OPPORTUNITIES TO PARTICIPATE AND
PRACTICESFORCONSTRAININGTHESIZEOFTHOSEOPPORTUNITIESTHATISAN
ORGANIZATIONOFTURNTAKINGSOITCANNOTDOWITHOUTANORGANIZATION
OF PRACTICES FOR USING THOSE OPPORTUNITIES TO FASHION COHERENT AND
SUSTAINEDTRAJECTORIESORCOURSESOFACTIONSEQUENCEORGANIZATION

4HEh4ROUBLEv0ROBLEM(OWTO$EALWITH4ROUBLEIN3PEAKING
(EARINGOR5NDERSTANDINGTHE4ALKOR/THER#ONDUCTSUCHTHAT
THE)NTERACTIONDOESNOT&REEZEIN0LACETHAT)NTERSUBJECTIVITYIS
-AINTAINEDOR2ESTOREDANDTHATTHE4URN3EQUENCEAND!CTIVITY
CAN0ROGRESSTO0OSSIBLE#OMPLETION
)FTHEORGANIZATIONOFTALKININTERACTIONSUPPLIESTHEBASICINFRASTRUCTURE
THROUGHWHICHTHEINSTITUTIONSANDSOCIALORGANIZATIONOFQUOTIDIAN
LIFEAREIMPLEMENTEDITHADBETTERBEPRETTYRELIABLEANDHAVEWAYS
OFGETTINGRIGHTEDIFBESETBYTROUBLE!NDSOITIS4ALKININTERACTION
ISASPRONEASANYORGANIZATIONISTOTRANSIENTPROBLEMSOFINTEGRATION
AND EXECUTION SPEAKERS CANNOT lND THE WORD THEY WANT lND THAT
THEYHAVESTARTEDTELLINGABOUTSOMETHINGTHATNEEDSSOMETHINGELSE
TOBETOLDlRSTHEARTHATTHEYARTICULATEDJUSTTHEOPPOSITEWORDFROM
THEONETHEYAREAFTERlNDTHATANOTHERISTALKINGATTHESAMETIME
AS THEY ARE AND SO FORTH !ND TALK IN INTERACTION IS AS VULNERABLE AS
ANYACTIVITYISTOINTERFERENCEFROMALTOGETHERUNRELATEDEVENTSINITS
ENVIRONMENTOVERmIGHTBYAIRPLANESANOUTBURSTOFTRAFlCNOISEOR
OTHERAMBIENTNOISETHATINTERFERESWITHTHEIRRECIPIENTSABILITYTOHEAR
ANDSOFORTH
&OR SUCH INESCAPABLE CONTINGENCIES THERE IS AN ORGANIZATION OF
PRACTICESFORDEALINGWITHTROUBLEORPROBLEMSINSPEAKINGHEARINGAND
UNDERSTANDINGTHETALK)TTURNSOUTTHATTHISORGANIZATIONWHICHWE
TERMANORGANIZATIONOFREPAIRISEXTRAORDINARILYEFFECTIVEATALLOWING
THEPARTIESTOLOCATEANDDIAGNOSETHETROUBLEANDINVIRTUALLYALLCASES
TODEALWITHITQUICKLYANDSUCCESSFULLY
4HEORGANIZATIONOFREPAIRDIFFERENTIATESBETWEENREPAIRINITIATEDAND
CARRIEDTHROUGHBYTHESPEAKEROFTHETROUBLESOURCEONTHEONEHANDAND
OTHERPARTICIPANTSINTHEINTERACTIONONTHEOTHERHAND4HEPRACTICESOF
REPAIRAREFOCUSEDINASHARPLYDElNEDWINDOWOFOPPORTUNITYINWHICH
VIRTUALLYALLREPAIRTHATISINITIATEDISINITIATED3CHEGLOFFETAL 4HIS
hREPAIRINITIATIONOPPORTUNITYSPACEvBEGINSINTHESAMETURNINDEED
INTHESAMETURN CONSTRUCTIONALUNIT4#5 INWHICHTHETROUBLESOURCE



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

OCCURREDANDEXTENDSTOTHENEXTTURNBYTHATSPEAKER4HECONSEQUENCE
ISTHATTHEINITIALOPPORTUNITYTOINITIATEREPAIRFALLSTOTHESPEAKEROFTHE
TROUBLESOURCEANDAVERYLARGEPROPORTIONOFREPAIRSAREADDRESSEDAND
RESOLVEDINTHESAMETURNANDSAME4#5INWHICHTHETROUBLESOURCE
OCCURREDhSAME TURNREPAIRv ORINITSIMMEDIATEAFTERMATHhTRANSITION
SPACEREPAIRv 4HESELARGELYINVOLVETROUBLESINSPEAKINGBUTCANALSOBE
DIRECTEDTOANTICIPATABLEPROBLEMSFORRECIPIENTSPROBLEMSOFHEARING
ORUNDERSTANDING4HEhPREFERENCESFORSELF INITIATIONOFREPAIRANDSELF
REPAIRvHAVEASONEOFTHEIRMANIFESTATIONSTHATRECIPIENTSOFTALKTHAT
ISFORTHEMPROBLEMATICREGULARLYWITHHOLDINITIATINGREPAIRINTHENEXT
TURNTOALLOWTHETROUBLE SOURCESPEAKERSANADDITIONALOPPORTUNITYTO
THEMSELVESINITIATEREPAIR)FTHEYDONOTDOSOTHENEXTOPPORTUNITY
FOR ADDRESSING THE TROUBLE FALLS TO RECIPIENTSORDINARILY IN THE NEXT
TURN&INALLYFOROURPURPOSES ASPEAKERMAYHAVEPRODUCEDATURNAT
TALKANDHADARECIPIENTREPLYTOITWITHNOINDICATIONOFTROUBLEONLY
TOlNDTHATTHEREPLYDISPLAYEDWHATISTOTHESPEAKERAPROBLEMATIC
UNDERSTANDINGOFTHATTURN4HENINTHETURNFOLLOWINGTHEONETHAT
HASDISPLAYEDTHEPROBLEMATICUNDERSTANDINGTHESPEAKEROFWHATNOW
TURNSOUTTOHAVEBEENATROUBLE SOURCETURNMAYTAKETHENEXTTURN
TOADDRESSTHATPROBLEMATICUNDERSTANDINGTHECANONICALFORMBEING
h.O)DIDNTMEAN8)MEANT9vCF3CHEGLOFFB 
!STHETALKDEVELOPSTHROUGHTHEREPAIRSPACETHEREAREFEWERAND
FEWER TROUBLES OR REPAIRABLES THAT GET ADDRESSED -OST ARE DEALT WITH
INTHESAMEORNEXTTURNANDTHESERANGEFROMPRODUCTIONPROBLEMS
SUCHASWORDSELECTIONWORDRETRIEVALARTICULATIONMANAGEMENTOF
PROSODY ETC AND RECEPTION PROBLEMS HEARING AND UNDERSTANDING
OF INAPPROPRIATELY SELECTED USAGES SUCH AS PERSON REFERENCE TERMS
TECHNICALTERMSCOMPLICATEDSYNTAXETC TOISSUESOFINTERSUBJECTIVITY
ANDSTRATEGICISSUESOFDELICATENESS)TISHARDTOSAYWHICHAREMORE
IMPORTANTWITHOUTVIRTUALLYIMMEDIATERESOLUTIONOFTHEPRODUCTION
ANDRECEPTIONPROBLEMSTHEINTERACTIONCANBESTALLEDINDElNITELYWITH
UNPREDICTABLECONSEQUENCESWITHOUTWAYSOFSPOTTINGDEPARTURESFROM
INTERSUBJECTIVITYANDRESTORINGITTHESHAREDREALITYOFTHEMOMENTIS
LOSTAGAINWITHUNPREDICTABLECONSEQUENCES
)TISHARDTOIMAGINEASOCIETYORCULTUREWHOSEORGANIZATIONOFINTER
ACTIONDOESNOTINCLUDEAREPAIRCOMPONENTANDONETHATWORKSMORE
ORLESSLIKETHEONE)HAVESKETCHED7EKNOWTHATDETAILSMAYVARYIN
WAYSLINKEDTOTHELINGUISTICSTRUCTUREOFTHELANGUAGESPOKENEITHER
ITSGRAMMATICALSTRUCTURECFEG&OXETAL ORITSPHONOLOGICAL
INVENTORY CF EG 3CHEGLOFF B  "UT THE STRUCTURE OF THE REPAIR
SPACEANDTHETERMSOFITSDIFFERENTIATIONBETWEENSAMEANDOTHERREPAIR

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

ARELIKELYNOTTOVARY&ORAMONGITSOTHERVIRTUESITISTHEAVAILABILITY

OFTHEPRACTICESOFREPAIRTHATALLOWSUSTOMAKEDOWITHTHENATURAL
LANGUAGESTHATPHILOSOPHERSANDLOGICIANSHAVELONGSHOWNTOBESO
INADEQUATEASTOREQUIRETHEINVENTIONOFARTIlCIALFORMALONES)TIS
REPAIRTHATALLOWSOURLANGUAGEUSENOTONLYTOALLOWBUTTOEXPLOITMANY
OFTHEFEATURESTHATHAVEBEENTREATEDASITSFAULTSAMBIGUITYPOLYSEMY
CONTRADICTIONANDSOFORTH$ESIGNEDNOTFORAUTOMATICPARSERSBUTFOR
SENTIENTBEINGSSHOULDTHESEUSAGESNOTBETRANSPARENTLYSOLVABLETHE
PRACTICESOFREPAIRAREAVAILABLETOGETSOLUTIONS3CHEGLOFF 
4HEPRACTICESOFREPAIRANDTHEIRORDEREDDEPLOYMENTAREPROBABLY
THE MAIN GUARANTORS OF INTERSUBJECTIVITY AND COMMON GROUND IN
INTERACTION )NTERSUBJECTIVITY CAN THEREFORE NOT REQUIRE GROUNDING
INSTATICBODIESOFSHAREDKNOWLEDGEORCOMMONGROUNDGROUNDING
THATIFTAKENSTRICTLYHASOFTENBEENFOUNDUNATTAINABLEINANYCASE
SEE EG 'ARlNKEL ;n n= FOR ONE DEMONSTRATION OF
THIS 4HEPRACTICESOFREPAIRMAKEINTERSUBJECTIVITYALWAYSAMATTEROF
IMMEDIATEANDLOCALDETERMINATIONNOTONEOFABSTRACTANDGENERAL
SHAREDFACTSVIEWSORSTANCES"UILTOFFTHEBASICINTERACTIVITYOFORDINARY
TALKEACHNEXTTURNDISPLAYSSOMEUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEJUSTPRIOROR
SOME PRIOR OTHER TALK ACTION SCENE AND SO FORTH OR IT DISPLAYS THE
PROBLEMATICITYOFSUCHUNDERSTANDINGFORITSSPEAKER)NTERSUBJECTIVITY
OR SHARED UNDERSTANDING ARE THEREBY ALWAYS ADDRESSED FOR PRACTICAL
PURPOSESABOUTSOMEDETERMINATEOBJECTATSOMEHEREANDNOWWITH
RESOURCESPRACTICALRESOURCESTHATISRESOURCESTHATAREPRACTICESFOR
DEALINGWITHTHETROUBLEANDRESTORINGINTERSUBJECTIVITY4HEPRACTICES
OF RECIPIENT DESIGN SEE BELOW GET THE TALK DESIGNED FOR ITS CURRENT
RECIPIENTSWHICHSERVESTOMINIMIZETHELIKELIHOODOFTROUBLEINTHE
lRSTINSTANCEANDTHEPRACTICESOFREPAIRPROVIDERESOURCESFORSPOTTING
DIAGNOSINGANDlXINGTROUBLETHATSOMEHOWOCCURSNONETHELESS4HE
READER MAY WISH TO EXPLORE THE RESONANCES BETWEEN THIS ACCOUNT OF
REPAIR AND INTERSUBJECTIVITY AND THE CHAPTERS OF %NlELD 'OODWIN
(ANKSAND,EVINSONINTHISVOLUME

4HE7ORD3ELECTION0ROBLEM(OWDOTHE%LEMENTSOFA4URN
GET3ELECTED(OWDOESTHAT3ELECTION)NFORMAND3HAPETHE
5NDERSTANDING!CHIEVEDBYTHE4URNS2ECIPIENTS
4URNSARECOMPOSEDOF4#5SSENTENTIALCLAUSALPHRASALANDLEXICAL
IN%NGLISHANDAGREATMANYOTHERLANGUAGES"UTOFWHATARE4#5S
COMPOSED2EFERRINGTOTHISGENERICORGANIZATIONAShWORDSELECTIONvIS
AVERNACULARWAYOFPUTTINGITORPERHAPSALINGUISTICORPSYCHOLINGUISTIC



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

ONEFORSOMEVARIETIESOFTHOSEDISCIPLINES!NDSOMETIMESITISARELEVANT
WAYOFPUTTINGITINCONVERSATIONnANALYTICWORK"UTHERE)WANTTOCALL
ATTENTIONTOTHEINTERACTIONALPRACTICESTHATAREONLYINCIDENTALLYLEXICAL
OR ABOUT WORDS 4HESE ARE PRACTICES OF REFERRING OR DESCRIBING OR
PERHAPSMOSTGENERALLYPRACTICESOFFORMULATING)NTALKININTERACTION
PARTICIPANTSFORMULATEORREFERTOPERSONS3ACKSAB3ACKSAND
3CHEGLOFF3CHEGLOFFC PLACES3CHEGLOFF TIMEACTIONS
AND SO ON 4HE USE OF PARTICULAR FORMULATIONS CANNOT BE ADEQUATELY
UNDERSTOODSIMPLYBYREFERENCETOTHEIRCORRECTNESS4HEPERSONWRITING
THISANDTHATISONEFORMULATIONALREADY ISNOTONLYASOCIOLOGISTHE
ISALSOASTHEPRONOUNINESCAPABLYREVEALED MALE#ALIFORNIAN*EWISH
ANDSOFORTH4HEPLACE)AMWRITINGISNOTONLYMYOFlCEITISIN(AINES
(ALLAT5NIVERSITYOF#ALIFORNIA,OS!NGELESIN,OS!NGELESONTHE
WESTSIDEINTHE5NITED3TATESANDSOFORTH!NDALTHOUGH)ALREADY
FORMULATEDMYCURRENTACTIVITYAShWRITINGTHISvITISALSOTYPINGRUSHING
TOlNISHBEFOREASTUDENTARRIVESANDSOFORTH4HATIShCORRECTNESSv
WILLNOTDOASTHEGROUNDSFORUSINGTHISORTHATFORMULATIONBECAUSE
THEREAREALWAYSOTHERFORMULATIONSTHATAREEQUALLYCORRECT7HATIS
CENTRALISRELEVANCENOTOBVIOUSLYINTHESENSEOF3PERBERAND7ILSON
 WHATACTIONORACTIONSTHESPEAKERISDESIGNINGTHEUTTERANCE
TOEMBODY
#ONSIDERFOREXAMPLETHISBITOFINTERACTION(YLAHASINVITED.ANCY
THETWOOFTHEMCOLLEGEJUNIORSINTHEEARLYS EARLIERINTHEDAY
TOGOTOTHETHEATERTHATNIGHTTOSEEAPERFORMANCEOF4HE$ARKATTHE
4OPOFTHE3TAIRS)NGE ANDTHEYARETALKINGONTHEPHONEINTHE
LATEAFTERNOONABOUTTHATUPCOMINGEVENTAMONGOTHERTHINGS !FTER
ABRIEFEXCHANGEABOUTWHENTHEYWILLMEET.ANCYASKS
 (YLA.ANCY 
 .ANCY
 (YLA


 (YLA 


 (YLA 
 .ANCY
 (YLA 




 .ANCY
 (YLA


 .ANCY

(OWDIDJUHEARABOUTITFROMTHEPAPE;R
;qHHHHH)SAW

!RIGHTWHENWASIT THIS

4HEWEEKBEFOREMYBIRTHDA;Y=
;9E=A;H
;)WZLOOKINGINTHE#ALENDAR
SECTIONENTHEREWASUN q UNADYIHKNOWALIDDLEU
THING qHH;HH
;5HHUH
!T TH THTHEATERSCALLEDTHE-ET4HEATERITSON
0OINT;SETTA=
;4HE-E=T

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 



 .ANCY
 (YLA


 .ANCY
 (YLA


 .ANCY
 (YLA
 .ANCY
 (YLA


 (YLA
 .ANCY
 (YLA
 .ANCY


 (YLA
 .ANCY

q
)NEVERHEARDOFI;T
;)HADNTEITHERqHHH"UTANYWAYS EN
THEHTHEMOO THINGWZTHm$ARKETHm4OPATHk3TAI;RS=



;-M H=M;





;%N
)NEARLYWENCHHRAZYCZ);)LOVE=THAT=MOVIE=
;Y9EAH)KN=OWY=OULOVE=THAT
S3OqHHANLIKETHElRSTSHOW
-;MHMM=
;WZGNNA=BE
q
ONMYBIRTHDAY
5HHU;H=
;)M=GO;NAWHHWHOULDH)LOVE
;3O
q
YIHKNOWFER3IMTUH;TAKEMETUHTHAT=
;9AYUH=

)WANTTOCALLATTENTIONHERETOONLYTWOBITSOF(YLASRESPONSIVETALK
STARTINGATLINETHETIMEFORMULATIONhTHEWEEKBEFOREMYBIRTHDAYv
ANDTHEACTIVITYFORMULATIONh)WASLOOKINGINTHE#ALENDARSECTIONvAN
ETHNOGRAPHICNOTETHEh#ALENDARvSECTIONOFTHE,OS!NGELES4IMESIS
THE#ULTUREAND%NTERTAINMENTSECTION &IRSTNOTETHAT(YLACONDUCTS
ANOUT LOUDSEARCHFORhWHENITWASvSHEISTAKINGCAREWITHTHISTIME
FORMULATION 4HERE ARE MANY OTHER WAYS OF REFERRING TO THE TIME IN
QUESTIONHOWMANYWEEKSAGOWHICHWEEKOFTHEMONTHTHEDATEAND
SOFORTH3HECHOOSEShTHEWEEKBEFOREMYBIRTHDAYv!NDNOWh)WAS
LOOKINGINTHE#ALENDARSECTIONvNOThREADINGTHEPAPERvNOThLOOKING
ATTHE#ALENDARSECTIONvNOTTHEh)SAWvWITHWHICHSHEHADINITIALLY
BEGUNATLINE ANDSOFORTH"YCOSELECTINGTHESETWOFORMULATIONS
SHEIShDOINGvADESCRIPTIONOFh)WASLOOKINGFORWHATTODOONMY
BIRTHDAYvALTHOUGHNOTARTICULATINGTHATDESCRIPTION
3OINTURNSATTALKTHATMAKEUPSEQUENCESOFACTIONSTHEELEMENTS
OF THE TALK ARE SELECTED AND DEPLOYED TO ACCOMPLISH ACTIONS AND TO
DO SO RECOGNIZABLY AND RECIPIENTS ATTEND THE TALK TO lND WHAT THE
SPEAKERISDOINGBYSAYINGITINTHOSEWORDSINTHATWAY5SINGhWORDSv
ORhUSAGESvORhFORMULATIONSvISAGENERICORGANIZATIONOFPRACTICESFOR
TALKININTERACTIONBECAUSETHATTALKISDESIGNEDTODOTHINGSTHINGS
THATlTWITHOTHERTHINGSINTHETALKMOSTOFTENTHEJUSTPRECEDING
ONES4ALKININTERACTIONISABOUTCONSTRUCTINGACTIONSWHICHISWHY
IT DOES NOT REDUCE TO LANGUAGE TREATING TALK IN INTERACTION ONLY FOR
ITSPROPERTIESASASYSTEMOFSYMBOLSORAMEDIUMFORARTICULATIONOR



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

DEPLOYINGPROPOSITIONSDOESNOTGETATITSCORE!NDTHEACTIONSTHAT
ARECONSTRUCTEDBYTALKANDOTHERCONDUCTININTERACTIONCOMPOSEAND
AREPARTSOFTRAJECTORIESORCOURSESOFACTIONWHICHISWHYAPRAGMATICS
THATDOESNOTATTENDTOTHESEQUENTIALORGANIZATIONOFACTIONSISATRISK
FORARIDITY

4HE/VERALL3TRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION0ROBLEM(OW$OESAN
/CCASIONOF)NTERACTIONGET3TRUCTURED7HATARETHOSE3TRUCTURES
!ND(OW$OES0LACEMENTINTHE/VERALL3TRUCTURE)NFORMTHE
#ONSTRUCTIONAND5NDERSTANDINGOFTHE4ALKAND/THER#ONDUCTAS
4URNSAS3EQUENCESOF!CTIONSANDSO&ORTH
3OME ACTIONS ARE POSITIONED NOT WITH RESPECT TO TURNS OR SEQUENCES
ALTHOUGH THEY ARE DONE IN TURNS AND SEQUENCES OR THE REPAIR SPACE
BUTBYREFERENCETOTHEOCCASIONOFINTERACTIONASAUNITWITHITSOWN
ORGANIZATION'REETINGSANDGOOD BYESARETHEMOSTOBVIOUSEXEMPLARS
BEINGPOSITIONEDATTHEBEGINNINGANDENDINGOFINTERACTIONALOCCASIONS
RESPECTIVELY,ESSOBVIOUSPERHAPSISTHATGREETINGSAREJUSTONEOFA
NUMBEROFACTIONSEQUENCETYPESTHATMAYCOMPOSEANOPENINGPHASEOF
ANINTERACTION3CHEGLOFF ANDGOOD BYESARETHELASTOFANUMBER
OFCOMPONENTSTHATMAKEUPACLOSINGSECTIONOFANINTERACTION7HAT
HAPPENSINBETWEENCANTAKEEITHEROFTWOFORMSASFARASWEKNOW
NOW ASTATEOFCONTINUOUSLYSUSTAINEDTALKANDWHATWECANCALLA
CONTINUINGSTATEOFINCIPIENTTALK3CHEGLOFFAND3ACKS 4HELATTER
TERMISMEANTTOREFERTOSETTINGSINWHICHTHEPARTIESTALKFORAWHILE
ANDTHENLAPSEINTOSILENCESILENCETHATDOESNOTPROMPTACLOSINGOF
THEINTERACTIONALOCCASION ATANYPOINTINWHICHTHETALKMAYSTARTUP
AGAIN#HARACTERISTICSETTINGSINCONTEMPORARYINDUSTRIALSOCIETIESMIGHT
BEFAMILIESORROOMMATESINTHELIVINGROOMINTHEEVENINGOCCUPANTS
OFACARINACARPOOLORALONGJOURNEYSEATMATESONANAIRPLANEDINERS
ATTABLECOWORKERSATAWORKBENCHANDSOFORTH)NSOMESOCIETIESTHIS
MAYBETHEDEFAULTORGANIZATIONOFTALKININTERACTION
!LTHOUGH GREETINGS AND GOOD BYES ARE PRETTY MUCH TIED TO THEIR
POSITIONSINTHEOVERALLSTRUCTURALORGANIZATIONOTHERTYPESOFACTION
MAYTAKEONADISTINCTIVECHARACTERDEPENDINGONWHEREINTHEOVERALL
STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION OF A CONVERSATION THEY OCCUR 3OME TYPES OF
ACTIONARECOMMONLYWITHHELDFROMOCCURRENCEEARLYINACONVERSATION
hREQUESTSvAREACASEINPOINT$OINGAREQUESTEARLYINTHEORGANIZATION
OFANINTERACTIONCANBEAWAYOFMARKINGITSURGENCYORSOMEOTHER
FEATUREKNOWNTOBERECOGNIZABLETOTHERECIPIENTS "YCONTRASTMANY
KINDSOFhNOTICINGSvAREORDINARILYMEANTTOOCCURASSOONASPOSSIBLE

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

AFTERTHEhNOTICEABLEvISDETECTABLE7ITHHOLDINGTHENOTICINGFROMEARLY
ENACTMENTCANBETAKENASFAILINGTOHAVENOTICEDTHENOTICEABLEORAS
TREATINGTHENOTICEABLEASNEGATIVELYVALENCED
4HE GENERIC CHARACTER OF THE OVERALL STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE
UNIThASINGLECONVERSATIONvCONSISTSSTRAIGHTFORWARDLYINITSPROVISION
OFTHEPRACTICESFORLAUNCHINGANDCLOSINGEPISODESOFINTERACTIONWITH
THECOMMITMENTSOFATTENTIONTHATTHEYPLACEONTHEIRPARTICIPANTS)F
TALKININTERACTIONISGOINGONTHEPARTIESWILLlNDTHEMSELVESTOBE
SOMEPLACEINITBYREFERENCETOTHISORDEROFORGANIZATION

)NTERACTIONAL0RACTICESATTHE2OOTSOF(UMAN
3OCIALITY
#ONTRIBUTIONSTOTHISVOLUMEEXPLORETHERELATIONSIFANYBETWEENTHE
VARIABILITY OF HUMAN CULTURE AND LANGUAGE THE WORKINGS OF HUMAN
COGNITIONANDTHEORGANIZATIONOFHUMANINTERACTION$ISCIPLINARILY
THISAMOUNTSTOARECONCILIATIONOFANTHROPOLOGYETHOLOGYPSYCHOLOGY
AND SOCIOLOGYNOT A SMALL UNDERTAKING 2ESEARCH ON INTERACTION
SUGGESTSANUMBEROFBEGINNINGSTEPS

#ANDIDATE5NIVERSALSIN(UMAN)NTERACTIONAND#ULTURAL
6ARIABILITY
!S)HAVEINTIMATEDIFNOTSTATEDEXPLICITLYINTHEPRECEDINGSECTIONS
) TAKE THE GENERIC ORDERS OF ORGANIZATION IN TALK IN INTERACTION TO BE
CANDIDATE UNIVERSALS /THER SOCIAL SPECIES DISPLAY AN ORGANIZATION
OF INTERACTION WITH CONSPECIlCS AND THERE IS NO COMPELLING REASON
THAT)AMAWAREOFFORDOUBTINGTHATTHISHOLDSTRUEFORHUMANS4HE
CAPACITYOFTRAVELERSMISSIONARIESCONQUERORSANDSOFORTHTOGETON
WITHHOSTPOPULATIONSTHEYAREVISITINGWHILEIGNORANTOFTHELANGUAGE
ANDCULTUREBOTHHISTORICALLYANDCONTEMPORANEOUSLYISATTHEVERY
LEASTCOMMONSENSEGROUNDSFORTHISASASTARTINGPOSITION)TSIMPORTIS
THATINTERACTIONINSOCIETIESANDCULTURESTHATAPPEARDIFFERENTFROMOUR
OWNBEEXAMINEDFORTHEIRSOLUTIONTOWHAT)HAVETERMEDTHEGENERIC
ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES HOW DO THEY ALLOCATE OPPORTUNITIES TO TALK IN
INTERACTIONANDCONSTRAINTHEDURATIONOFTHETALKINTHOSEOPPORTUNITIES
(OWISTHETALKINTURNSDESIGNEDTOEMBODYACTIONSANDHOWARETHOSE
ACTIONSCOMBINEDTOFORMCOURSESOFACTIONACROSSSPEAKERSANDOTHER
PARTICIPANTS(OWAREPROBLEMSOFSPEAKINGHEARINGANDUNDERSTANDING
THETALKMANAGED7HATPRACTICESUNDERLIETHEFORMULATIONOFWHAT
PEOPLETALKABOUTPERSONSPLACESACTIONSANDWHATEVERELSEENTERS



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

INTOTHEIRTALK(OWAREOCCASIONSOFINTERACTIONLAUNCHEDORAVOIDED 
HOWARETHEYENDEDANDHOWISTHECONTINUITYORNONCONTINUITYOF
TALKWITHINSOMEOCCASIONORGANIZED
4HEIMPORTOFTHECLAIMTHATTHESEORGANIZATIONSAREGENERICISNOT
THATTHEWAYTALKININTERACTIONISDONEINTHE5NITED3TATESORMODERN
INDUSTRIALIZEDSOCIETIESISGENERICITISTHATTHEORGANIZATIONALISSUES
TO WHICH THESE ORGANIZATIONS OF PRACTICE ARE ADDRESSED ARE GENERIC
#ONVERSATIONANALYSISISNOTAVERSETOlNDINGINDEEDCELEBRATINGWHAT
APPEARTOBEDIFFERENCESININTERACTIONINOTHERCULTURESSOCIETIESAND
LANGUAGES)NSOMEINSTANCESTHEDIFFERENCESAREREADILYUNDERSTOODBY
REFERENCESTODIFFERENCESINTHELINGUISTICORCULTURALRESOURCESOFTHAT
POPULATIONINOTHERSTHEYSERVETOTRIGGERASEARCHFORAMOREGENERAL
ANDFORMALACCOUNTUNDERWHICHOURPREVIOUSUNDERSTANDINGANDTHE
NEWLYENCOUNTEREDONEAREBOTHSUBSUMABLE
(EREISANEXAMPLEOFTHElRSTOFTHESESEE3CHEGLOFFB 3OME
YEARSAGOAGRADUATESTUDENTWORKINGINTHEHIGHLANDSOF'UATEMALA
INAVILLAGEWHERE1UICHEWASTHELANGUAGEREPORTEDTHATSAME TURN
REPAIRSWEREINITIATEDVERYDIFFERENTLYTHERETHANTHEYWEREINTHESEVERAL
LANGUAGES THAT SHE KNEW $ADEN AND -C#LAREN ND  7HAT IS MOST
FAMILIARTOSPEAKERSOF)NDO %UROPEANLANGUAGESARECUTOFFSEGGLOTTAL
ORDENTALSTOPS ANDSOUNDSTRETCHES"UTIN1UICHEBOTHSTOPSAND
STRETCHES WERE PHONEMIC AND ACCORDINGLY NOT USED BY SPEAKERS TO
INITIATEREPAIRONTHETALKEARLIERINTHEIRTURN,ONGSTRETCHESWHICH
WERENOTPHONEMICFOR1UICHEWEREUSEDTOINITIATESAME TURNREPAIR
/NTHEONEHANDTHEVARIATIONINPRACTICECOULDBESTRAIGHTFORWARDLY
TRACEDTODIFFERENCESINTHEPHONEMICINVENTORYOFTHELANGUAGESONTHE
OTHERHANDOURUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEPRACTICESOFREPAIRWASREINFORCED
BYlNDINGINTHISVERYDIFFERENTLINGUISTICANDCULTURALENVIRONMENTA
hPLACEvlNDABLEONLYBYREFERENCETOTHEORGANIZATIONOFREPAIRTHE
INITIATIONOFSAMETURNREPAIR
3OMETIMESWHATAPPEAREDTOBEAMAJORDIFFERENCEINTHEPRACTICES
OFTALKININTERACTIONTURNSOUTONCLOSERINSPECTIONMADEPOSSIBLEBY
MODERNTECHNOLOGYNOTTOBEDIFFERENTATALL&OREXAMPLEACLASSIC
CHAPTERBY2EISMAN DESCRIBEDWHATHECALLEDAhCONTRAPUNTAL
CONVERSATIONALv SYSTEM THAT IN EFFECT WAS WITHOUT ANY TURN TAKING
ORGANIZATIONATALL3UBSEQUENTLY3IDNELLS EXAMINATIONOFVIDEO
RECORDEDDATAFROMTHESAMEAREAREVEALEDATURN TAKINGORGANIZATION
VIRTUALLYIDENTICALTOTHEONEDESCRIBEDIN3ACKSETAL 
4HESECONDOFTHESEEXAMPLESAPPEARSTOINVOLVETHETECHNOLOGYOF
OBSERVATION MORE THAN ISSUES OF UNIVERSALITY OR VARIATION IT WAS THE

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

POSSIBILITYOFEXAMININGANDREEXAMININGTHEDATAATALEVELOFDETAIL
NOTACCESSIBLETOONEEXPOSUREINREALTIMETHATALLOWEDSPECIlCATIONOF
WHEREANDWHENEACHPARTICIPANTBEGANANDSTOPPEDTALKING4HElRST
OFTHEPRECEDINGEXAMPLESHOWEVERISONESORTOFINSTANCEOFTHISISSUE
ANDITEXEMPLIlESAFAMILIARPOLARITYININQUIRYAPREOCCUPATIONWITH
VARIATIONVERSUSAPREOCCUPATIONWITHGENERALITY"OTHAREIMPORTANT
BUTINTHEDOMAINWEARECONCERNEDWITHGENERALITYSEEMSTOMETOHAVE
THEPRIORITYALTHOUGHNOTEXCLUSIVITY &ORTHEDIMENSIONSONWHICH
VARIABILITYISOBSERVEDANDRENDEREDCONSEQUENTIALAREFRAMEDBYTHE
DIMENSIONSOFGENERALITYTHATRENDERTHECOMPARISONRELEVANTTOBEGIN
WITH)F)ASKYOUHOWAPEARISDIFFERENTFROMHONESTYYOUWILLTHINK
)HAVEAJOKEORACLEVERRIDDLEUPMYSLEEVETHEYLACKTHECOMMON
CLASS MEMBERSHIP THAT RENDERS COMPARISON RELEVANT 4HE GENERIC
ORGANIZATIONSOFTALKININTERACTIONOFFERSOMEPROPOSEDDIMENSIONSOF
RELEVANCEFORTALKININTERACTIONPERSELANGUAGESCULTURESANDSOCIETIES
CAN BE EXAMINED BY REFERENCE TO THESE ORGANIZATIONS WHETHER WHAT
IS FOUND WILL BE BEST UNDERSTOOD AS VARIABILITY AND DIFFERENCES OR AS
VARIATIONSONASAMEUNDERLYINGSOLUTIONTOAGENERICPROBLEMREMAINS
TOBEFOUNDOUT
!SIDEFROMTHESEORGANIZATIONSOFPRACTICEORRATHERBYVIRTUEOFTHEM
CERTAINOTHERFEATURESOFTALKININTERACTIONAREPLAUSIBLECANDIDATESFOR
UNIVERSALRELEVANCEANDMERITMENTIONHERE
/NEISMINIMIZATION&ORVARIOUSOFTHEDOMAINSWEHAVESTUDIED
THEDEFAULTORBASEFORMISTHEMINIMALFORM&OREXAMPLE
7HENAPARTYBEGINSTALKINATURNTHEYHAVEINITIALLYTHERIGHT
ANDRESPONSIBILITY TOPRODUCEONE4#5TOCOMPLETION3ACKSETAL
 'ETTINGTOPRODUCEMOREISCONTINGENTONTHECONDUCTOFTHE
SPEAKERANDOFTHECOPARTICIPANTSCF3CHEGLOFF TOOVERCOME
AMINIMIZATIONCONSTRAINTEMBODIEDINTHETRANSITIONRELEVANCEOF
POSSIBLETURNCOMPLETION
4HE BASIC FORM OF A SEQUENCE IS TWO TURNSTHE MINIMUM FOR IT
TO BE A SEQUENCE 3CHEGLOFF IN PRESS 3CHEGLOFF AND 3ACKS  
ADDITIONALTURNSREPRESENTEXPANSIONSINSPECTABLEFORWHATTHEY
AREBEINGUSEDTODO
)NREFERRINGTOSOMEONETHEREISPREFERENCEFORMINIMIZATIONTHAT
ISFORASINGLEREFERENCEFORM3ACKSAND3CHEGLOFF ANYTHING
MOREISMARKEDANDISEXAMINABLEFORWHATELSEOVERANDABOVE
SIMPLYREFERRINGITISBEINGUSEDTODO



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

)NALLOFTHESEDOMAINSOFPRACTICEANDOTHERSWElNDTHISTRANSPARENTLY

SIMPLEST DESIGN THE MINIMAL FORM IS THE UNMARKED DEFAULT SPECIAL
IMPORTISATTACHEDTOEXPANSIONSOFIT
!SECONDFEATUREISTHESPECIALCHARACTEROFhNEXTNESSvORNEXTnPRIOR
POSITIONINGOPERATINGATVARIOUSLEVELSOFGRANULARITY3CHEGLOFFA 
&OREXAMPLE
4HETURN TAKINGORGANIZATIONSERVESTOALLOCATEONETURNATATIME
NEXTTURN
!BSENT ANY PROVISION TO THE CONTRARY ANY TURN WILL BE HEARD AS
ADDRESSEDTOTHEJUSTPRIORTHATISTHEONEITISNEXTAFTER
4HEPRODUCTIONANDPARSINGOFATURNATTALKISBYREFERENCETOA
SUCCESSIONOFhNEXTELEMENTSvWHEREELEMENTSCANBEWORDSPARTS
OFWORDSORSOUNDS4HISHOLDSASWELLFORTHEDEPLOYMENTOFSELF
INITIATEDREPAIRWHICHTURNSOUTTOBEREGULARLYPLACEDBYREFERENCE
TOhNEXTWORDvORhNEXTSOUNDvOFWORD
h.EXTNESSvCANOPERATEFORSEQUENCESIFASEQUENCETYPECANBE
RECIPROCALIEAFTER!LANINITIATESTO"ILL"ILLRECIPROCATESTO!LAN 
THENTHEDEFAULTPOSITIONFORTHERECIPROCALISNEXTSEQUENCEMOST
FAMILIARLY IN h!LAN (OW ARE YOU "ILL &INE AND YOUv  OR IF A
PRESEQUENCEISDONEEGASUMMONSMAKINGANANSWERRELEVANT
NEXT THENIFTHERESPONSEGIVESAGO AHEADTHENTHEBASESEQUENCE
SHOULDOCCURNEXTCF3CHEGLOFF 
-OST FUNDAMENTALLY THE BASIC PLACE TO LOOK TO SEE HOW SOMEONE
UNDERSTOODATURNISTOSEEWHATTHEYPRODUCEDINNEXTTURN)NOTHER
WORDS OVERWHELMINGLY TALK IN INTERACTION IS LOCALLY ORGANIZEDONE
TURNATATIMEONESEQUENCEATATIMEANDSOFORTH
! THIRD FEATURE IS A PREFERENCE FOR PROGRESSIVITY AGAIN AT WORK AT
VARIOUSLEVELSOFGRANULARITY
2ECIPIENTSORIENTTOEACHNEXTSOUNDASANEXTPIECEINTHEDEVELOPING
TRAJECTORYOFWHATTHESPEAKERISSAYINGORDOINGPAUSESCUTOFFS
REPEATSIN BREATHSANDTHELIKEALLINVOLVESOMEINTERFERENCEWITH
PROGRESSIVITYANDAREEXAMINABLEFORWHATIMPORTTHEYHAVEINTHE
PRODUCTIONANDRECOGNITIONOFWHATISGOINGON
/THERINITIATIONSOFREPAIRAREUNDERSTOODASSTOPPINGTHECOURSEOF
ACTIONTHATWASINPROGRESSTODEALWITHSOMEPROBLEMINHEARING
ORUNDERSTANDINGTHETALKAREONTHATCOUNTDISPREFERREDANDMAY
SERVEASHARBINGERSOFOTHERDISPREFERREDCONDUCTINTHEOFlNG

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

4HEREISPLAINLYARELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHESETHREEFEATURESPROGRESSIVITY
ISREALIZEDWHENSOMETRAJECTORYOFACTIONMOVESFROMTHELAST REACHED
POINTTOTHENEXTDELAYMEANSSOMETHINGOCCURSNEXTOTHERTHANWHAT
WASDUENEXTEXPANSIONOFSOMEUNITATURNASEQUENCEAPERSON
REFERENCEBEYONDITSDEFAULTMINIMALREALIZATIONCANCONSTITUTEALOSS
OFPROGRESSIVITYANDSOFORTH4HEFORMALITYOFTHESEOBSERVATIONSMAKES
POSSIBLEEXAMINATIONOFAVARIETYOFCULTURALANDBEHAVIORALSETTINGS
ASAWAYOFASSESSINGTHEDEGREETOWHICHANDTHELEVELSATWHICHTHE
UNDERGIRDINGSOFHUMANSOCIALITYARESPECIES GENERICORVARIABLE

)MPLICATIONSFOR(UMAN#OGNITION!CTION2ECOGNITIONAND4O!GOODSTARTINGPOINTFOREXPLORINGTHElTWITHCONVERSATIONANALYSIS
ISTOREMARKONTHEOBVIOUSPOINTTHATWHATEVERISTOBEFOUNDINTHE
COGNITIVEAPPARATUSITISNOTWORKINGONABLANKlELDINITSENGAGEMENT
WITH THE WORLD !S CENTRAL A THEME AS ANY IN THE PRECEDING SKETCH
OF CONVERSATION ANALYSIS IS THAT TALK IN INTERACTION IS ABOUT ACTION
AND COURSES OF ACTION REQUESTING COMPLAINING ASKING ANSWERING
DIS AGREEINGCORRECTINGALIGNINGETC 4HETALKSPEAKERSDOISDESIGNED
TOEMBODYONEORMOREACTIONSANDTODOSORECOGNIZABLYTHEUPTAKE
COPARTICIPANTSMANAGEISDESIGNEDTORECOGNIZEWHATTHESPEAKERAND
OTHER COPARTICIPANTS MEAN TO BE DOING WITH THEIR CONDUCT SO AS TO
UNDERWRITEANAPPROPRIATENEXTACTION.OTETHERESONANCEHEREWITH
THEEARLYDISCUSSIONONTHEPARSINGOFACTIONINTHECHAPTERBY"YRNE !
4O-HASINTHElRSTINSTANCETOBEFURNISHEDWITHMETHODSFORDESIGNING
TALKTODORECOGNIZABLEACTIONSANDMETHODSFORRECOGNIZINGTHEACTIONS
SODESIGNEDBYCOPARTICIPANTS)NANUTSHELLTHATISALARGECHUNKOF
WHATCONVERSATIONANALYSISISABOUT%VIDENCESOFTHISARESCATTEREDIN
THEPRECEDINGPAGES
0RESEQUENCESLIKEPREINVITATIONSPREANNOUNCEMENTSANDTHELIKE
AREDESIGNEDTOBERECOGNIZABLETORECIPIENTSASFORESHADOWINGDOING
ANINVITATIONORANANNOUNCEMENTUNLESSTHERECIPIENTDISCOURAGES
DOINGSOINTHEIRREPLYh!REYOUDOINGANYTHINGTONIGHTvh9EAH
)VE GOT A PAPER TO WRITEv WARNS THE PROSPECTIVE INVITER THAT AN
INVITATIONWILLBEREJECTED4HATISWHATITISDESIGNEDTODOANDDO
RECOGNIZABLY!RECIPIENTHEARSITASSOMETHINGASKEDNOTFORITSELF
NOTINITSOWNRIGHTBUTASAHARBINGEROFSOMETHINGCONTINGENTLYTO
FOLLOWDEPENDINGONTHERESPONSE4HATISWHYAQUESTIONLIKEh!RE
YOUDOINGANYTHINGTONIGHTvISOFTENMETWITHARETURNQUESTION
h7HYv 4HE hWHYv ASKERS KNOW THEY ARE NOT BEING ASKED FOR A



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

BEHAVIORALLY ACCURATE ACCOUNT THEY ARE BEING ASKED ABOUT THEIR

AVAILABILITY)TAKEITTHATTHISISONESORTOFTHINGTHAT4O-STUDIES
ARE INTERESTED IN 'ETTING AT THEM WILL ) THINK REQUIRE KNOWING
ABOUTTHEORGANIZATIONOFADJACENCYPAIRBASEDSEQUENCESANDTHEIR
EXPANSIONS
(OW DO ORDINARY SENTENCES ACCOMPLISH ACTIONS RECOGNIZABLE AS
REQUESTSANNOUNCEMENTSCOMPLAINTSANDSOFORTH!SWITHVIRTU
ALLYEVERYTHINGINTALKININTERACTIONITISAMATTEROFPOSITIONAND
COMPOSITIONHOWTHETALKISCONSTRUCTEDANDWHEREITIS#ONSIDER
FOR EXAMPLE THIS EXCHANGE WHEN AN UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT
#AROLCOMESBACKTOHERROOMWITHHERROOMMATESANDFRIENDS
THERE
 3.  
 3HERIE
(I#AROL

#AROL
(;I=
 2UTHIE
;#!2/=,()
 3HERIE  9OUDIDNGETENICECREAMSANDWICH

#AROL
)KNOWHH)DECIDEDTHATMYBODYDIDNTNEEDIT
 3HERIE
9ESBUTOURSDID
 3HERIE
HHHEH HEH HEH;HEH HEH HEH;qHHIH

  ;EHHHEHHEH;

  ;

#AROL
HH!WRIGHTGIMMESOMEMONEYENYOUCNTREATMETOONEAN


)LLBUYYOUALLSOME;TOO=
 3HERIE

;)M=KIDDING)DONTNEEDIT




)TMATTERSTHAT3HERIESTURNATLINEISANOTICING.OTICINGSAREMEANT
TOBEDONEASEARLYASPOSSIBLEANDONEPLACETHATQUALIlESISJUSTAFTER
COMINGINTOMUTUALLYVISIBLECOPRESENCEHEREITISDONEDIRECTLYAFTER
THEEXCHANGEOFGREETINGS"UTTOLEAVEITATTHATWOULDBETOMISSTHE
BOAT
4HISISAhPOSSIBLECOMPLAINTvANDTHESEQUENCECONTINUESPASTTHE
POINTATWHICH)HAVEENDEDTHETRANSCRIPTTHEPARTICIPANTSWORKING
ITTHROUGHASACOMPLAINTSEQUENCE(OWISITACOMPLAINT)TISNOTA
MATTEROFDIVININGINTENTIONS$ESIGNINGONESTALKBYFORMULATINGAN
ABSENCEISAWAYOFDOINGAPOSSIBLECOMPLAINTITISAPRACTICEBYWHICH
COMPLAININGCANGETDONEANDDONERECOGNIZABLY.OTANYABSENCE
OF COURSE AND MORE NEEDS TO BE SAID BUT THIS IS ONE DIRECTION THAT
CONVERSATIONANALYTICWORKPURSUESHOWRECOGNIZABLEACTIONSGETDONE
ANDGETRECOGNIZEDASSUCHHEREITISTHENEGATIVEFORMULATIONTHATISAT

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

THEHEARTOFTHEPRACTICEAPRACTICEFORDOINGhPOSSIBLECOMPLAINTv)
TAKEITTHATTHISISANOTHERSORTOFTHINGTHAT4O-STUDIESAREINTERESTED
IN
!NDMOREGENERALLYFORMULATIONSAREPARTOFTHEDESIGNOFSOME
TALKTODOSOMEACTION&OREXAMPLEREFERRINGTOAPERSONBYNAME
ORBYWHATWECALLARECOGNITIONALDESCRIPTIONASPEAKERCANBUILD
INTOATURNDESIGNEDTODOSOMETHINGELSEANINVITATIONORDEMAND
TOARECIPIENTTORECOGNIZEWHOISBEINGREFERREDTOASSOMEONETHAT
THEYKNOW/RTHESPEAKERCANREFERTOTHATPERSONAShTHISGUYvAND
CONVEYTHATTHISISNOTAPERSONTHERECIPIENTSHOULDTRYTORECOGNIZE
(EREAGAINPRACTICESOFTALKINGBUILDINTOTHETALKSOMETHINGFOR
THERECIPIENTTOlNDINIT
4HISLASTPOINTEXEMPLIlESANOTHERPRACTICESOCENTRALTOTALKANDOTHER
CONDUCT IN INTERACTION THAT IT IS AS COMPELLING A PRACTICE AS ANY FOR
UNIVERSALSTATUSANDTHATISTHEPRACTICEOFRECIPIENTDESIGN4HETHINGS
ONETALKSABOUTWITHANOTHERARESELECTEDANDCONlGUREDFORWHOTHAT
OTHERISEITHERINDIVIDUALLYORCATEGORICALLY!NDHOWONESPEAKSABOUT
THEMWHATWORDSREFERENCEFORMSANDSOFORTHARETOBEUSEDISALSO
SHAPEDBYREFERENCETOWHOTHERECIPIENTRELEVANTLYISATTHATMOMENT
FORTHISSPEAKERATTHISJUNCTUREOFTHISINTERACTION4HECENTRALITYOF
RECIPIENTDESIGNMAYHAVEAPROFOUNDBEARINGON4O-ANDONHUMAN
COGNITIONMOREGENERALLYFORWHATPERSONSAREREQUIREDTODEALWITHIN
THEMUNDANEINTERCOURSEOFORDINARYINTERACTIONISNOTTHEBROADRANGE
OFTHINGSTHATCOULDPOSSIBLYOCCURCOULDPOSSIBLYREQUIREIMMEDIATE
UNDERSTANDINGANDSOFORTHBUTRATHERAPRESORTEDSETOFELEMENTSOF
INTERACTIONDESIGNEDFORWHOTHEYRELEVANTLYAREATTHATMOMENTINTHAT
INTERACTION4ALKININTERACTIONISINOTHERWORDSDESIGNEDFORACCESSIBILITY
TOITSRECIPIENTANDOVERWHELMINGLYSUCCESSFULLYSO4HISISTHElRSTLINE
OFDEFENSEOFINTERSUBJECTIVITYANDCOMMONGROUND4HEDEMANDSON
COGNITIONATLEASTFORINTERACTIONARETHEREBYSUBSTANTIALLYREDUCED
ANDSHAPED)TISBECAUSETHECONDITIONSOFLANGUAGEUSEINORDINARY
INTERACTIONAREVERYDIFFERENTFROMTHOSEINTHEDISCOURSEOFLOGICAND
SCIENCE THAT THE PROBLEMS THAT NATURAL LANGUAGE POSES FOR LOGIC AND
SCIENCEDONOTARISEINQUOTIDIANTALKININTERACTION4HERELEVANTWAYS
OFSTUDYINGHUMANCOGNITIONMAYTHEREFORENOTBEONESDESIGNEDFOR
ANONYMOUShSUBJECTSvBECAUSETHATISNOTWHATHUMANCOGNITIONFOR
INTERACTIONISDESIGNEDTODEALWITH



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

#LOSING
,ETMEENDBYREPEATINGSOMEOFTHElNALWORDSOF%RVING'OFFMANS
0RESIDENTIAL !DDRESS TO THE !MERICAN 3OCIOLOGICAL !SSOCIATION h4HE
)NTERACTION/RDERv (EWROTE
&ORMYSELF)BELIEVETHATHUMANSOCIALLIFEISOURSTOSTUDYNATURALISTIC
ALLY SUB SPECIE AETERNITATIS &ROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE PHYSICAL AND
BIOLOGICALSCIENCESHUMANSOCIALLIFEISONLYASMALLIRREGULARSCABON
THEFACEOFNATURENOTPARTICULARLYAMENABLETODEEPSYSTEMATICANALYSIS
!NDSOITIS"UTITSOURSv
!NDONEMIGHTNOWADDITISONLYTHISSPECIESSOCIALLIFETHATHAS
MADE POSSIBLE THOSE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND THE VERY
NOTIONOFhDEEPSYSTEMATICANALYSISv
!LTHOUGH'OFFMANWASVIRTUALLYAPOLOGETICFORTHESTATUREOFINTERACTION
STUDIESWHENPUTNEXTTOTRADITIONALSTUDIESOFSOCIALSTRUCTURETHISWAS
ACOMPARISONFORCEDONHIMBYACAREERINSOCIOLOGYANDAPRESIDENTIAL
ADDRESSAPPROPRIATELYSHAPEDFORPRACTITIONERSOFITSENTIREREACH)NTHE
PRESENTCONTEXTINTERACTIONSTUDIESNEEDNOAPOLOGYNORISITNECESSARY
TOESCHEWTHEPOSSIBILITYOFDEEPSYSTEMATICANALYSIS3UCHSTUDIESOFFER
THEPOSSIBILITYOFCONNECTINGTHEDISPARATETHREADSOFANTHROPOLOGICAL
ETHOLOGICALLINGUISTICPSYCHOLOGICALANDSOCIOLOGICALINQUIRYBRINGING
USCLOSERTOANUNDERSTANDINGOFHUMANSOCIALITYANDWITHITOFWHAT
MAKESUSDISTINCTIVELYHUMANINTHElRSTPLACE

.OTES
 ) MEAN TO INCLUDE UNDER THIS TERM hTALKv IMPLEMENTED BY SIGN LAN
GUAGEANDOTHERFORMSOFCOMMUNICATIONININTERACTIONTHATSHARETHEBASIC
CHARACTERISTICSOFVOCALIZEDTALKINGSOTELEPHONECONVERSATIONBUTNOTCOM
PUTER CHATS FOR THE FORMER ARE SYNCHRONOUS MOMENT TO MOMENT AND THE
LATTERARENOT)TSHOULDGOWITHOUTSAYINGALTHOUGHTHECONTEMPORARYUSEOF
THETERMMULTIMODALINTERACTIONSUGGESTSOTHERWISE THAThTALKININTERACTIONv
SHOULDBEUNDERSTOODAShTALKANDOTHERCONDUCTININTERACTIONvTHATISAS
INCLUDING POSTURE GESTURE FACIAL EXPRESSION ONGOING OTHER ACTIVITIES WITH
WHICHTHETALKMAYBECOTEMPORALANDPOTENTIALLYCOORDINATEDANDANYOTHER
FEATURES OFTHESETTING BY WHICH THETALKMAY BEINFORMED ANDONWHICHIT
MAYDRAW

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

 )DEALLYTHISACCOUNTWOULDBESUPPLEMENTEDBYEMPIRICALEXEMPLARSOF
THESEVERALORGANIZATIONSOFPRACTICESTHATAREHEREDISCURSIVELYDESCRIBEDBUT
WITHAFEWEXCEPTIONSTHISISNOTPOSSIBLEWITHINOURSPACELIMITATIONS)TWILL
HAVETOSUFlCETOREFERTHEREADERTOTHEWORKSINWHICHTHESEORGANIZATIONS
HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED 3CHEGLOFF AND 3ACKS  ON OVERALL STRUCTURAL
ORGANIZATION3ACKSETALONTURNTAKING3CHEGLOFFETALONREPAIR
3CHEGLOFF D ON TURN ORGANIZATION AND 3CHEGLOFF AND 3ACKS  3ACKS
VOLFFAND3CHEGLOFFNDBINPRESSONSEQUENCEORGANIZATION
3OMEWORKSINWHICHFURTHERSPECIlCATIONOFPRACTICESWITHINTHESEDOMAINS
HAS BEEN ADVANCED ARE 3CHEGLOFF  AND ,ERNER  ON TURN TAKING
3CHEGLOFF  B  C ON REPAIR ,ERNER   ON TURN
ORGANIZATION AND 3CHEGLOFF A ON ACTION FORMATION 7ORK DESIGNED AS
EXERCISESDISPLAYINGHOWTHECONDUCTOFANALYSISWORKSANDHOWITSUPPORTS
THESTANCESADOPTEDINTHISKINDOFINQUIRYARE3CHEGLOFFAANDB
 4WO SORTS OF EXCEPTION SHOULD BE MENTIONED HERE /NE INVOLVES THE
CLAIMTHATTHEREISAPLACEINWHICHTALKININTERACTIONISNOTSOORGANIZEDAS
IN2EISMANS CLAIMFORhCONTRAPUNTALCONVERSATIONvIN!NTIGUA3IDNELL
 CASTS CONSIDERABLE DOUBT ON 2EISMANS ACCOUNT 4HE OTHER INVOLVES
SPECIlCATIONSOFWHEREINCONVERSATIONTHEhONEATATIMEvCLAIMDOESNOTHOLD
FOR EXAMPLE ,ERNER  ON hCHORAL CO PRODUCTIONv OR $URANTI  ON
hPOLYPHONIC DISCOURSEv HERE THE PHENOMENON BEING DESCRIBED IS VIRTUALLY
DElNED AS AN OBJECT OF INTEREST BY ITS DEPARTURE FROM THE OTHERWISE DEFAULT
ORGANIZATIONOFTALK7ORKONhOVERLAPPINGTALKvEG*EFFERSON
3CHEGLOFFB LOCATESTHETOPICBYREFERENCETOITSPROBLEMATIC
RELATIONTOTHEDEFAULTONE AT A TIMEORGANIZATION
 &OR AN ANALYSIS OF QUITE AN ELABORATE SEQUENCE LINES OF TRANSCRIPT
COMPOSINGASINGLESEQUENCESEE3CHEGLOFF
 4HEWAYREPAIRISORGANIZEDCANHAVETHECONSEQUENCETHATITISSOMETIMES
INITIATEDATAGREATERhDISTANCEvFROMTHETROUBLEWHILESTILLBEINGWITHINTHE
BOUNDARIES THAT CAN HERE BE ONLY ROUGHLY CHARACTERIZED &OR AN ACCOUNT OF
THISSEE3CHEGLOFFB
 4OCONSERVETIMEANDSPACE)HAVEOMITTEDTHEPRACTICESOFTURNCONSTRUC
TIONASAGENERICORGANIZATIONINTALKININTERACTIONALTHOUGHITHASAKEYROLE
INTHEORGANIZATIONOFTURNTAKINGONTHEONEHANDANDTHEORGANIZATIONOF
SEQUENCESONTHEOTHERHANDCF3CHEGLOFFD 
 4HIS SEQUENCE IS EXPLICATED IN SOME DETAIL IN 3CHEGLOFF n
)T MAY BE USEFUL TO CLARIFY THE USAGE HERE AND IN SOME OTHER CONVERSATION
ANALYTICWRITINGOFTHETERMFORMAThAPOSSIBLE8vASINTHETEXTShAPOSSIBLE
COMPLAINTv7HATFOLLOWSISTAKENFROM3CHEGLOFFDnN



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

4HE USAGE IS NOT MEANTAS A TOKENOF ANALYTICUNCERTAINTYORHEDGING )TS

ANALYTICLOCUSISNOTINTHElRSTINSTANCETHEWORLDOFTHEAUTHORANDREADER
BUT THE WORLD OF THE PARTIES TO THE INTERACTION 4O DESCRIBE SOME UTTERANCE
FOREXAMPLEAS@APOSSIBLEINVITATION3ACKS)n3CHEGLOFFA
XXVInXXVII OR@APOSSIBLECOMPLAINT3CHEGLOFFn ISTOCLAIMTHAT
THERE IS A DESCRIBABLE PRACTICE OF TALK IN INTERACTION WHICH IS USABLE TO DO
RECOGNIZABLE INVITATIONS OR COMPLAINTS A CLAIM WHICH CAN BE DOCUMENTED
BYEXEMPLARSOFEXCHANGESINWHICHSUCHUTTERANCESWERESORECOGNIZEDBY
THEIRRECIPIENTS ANDTHATTHEUTTERANCENOWBEINGDESCRIBEDCANBEUNDER
STOODTOHAVEBEENPRODUCEDBYSUCHAPRACTICEANDISTHUSANALYZABLEASAN
INVITATIONORASACOMPLAINT4HISCLAIMISMADEANDCANBEDEFENDEDINDE
PENDENTOFWHETHERTHEACTUALRECIPIENTONTHISOCCASIONHASTREATEDITASAN
INVITATIONORNOTANDINDEPENDENTOFWHETHERTHESPEAKERCANBESHOWNTO
HAVEPRODUCEDITFORRECOGNITIONASSUCHONTHISOCCASION3UCHANANALYTIC
STANCEISREQUIREDTOPROVIDERESOURCESFORACCOUNTSOF@FAILURESTORECOGNIZEAN
UTTERANCEASANINVITATIONORCOMPLAINTFORINORDERTOCLAIMTHATARECIPIENT
FAILED TO RECOGNIZE IT AS SUCH OR RESPOND TO IT AS SUCH ONE MUST BE ABLE TO
SHOWTHATITWASRECOGNIZABLEASSUCHIETHATITWAS@APOSSIBLE8FORTHE
PARTICIPANTS3CHEGLOFFNDBTOAPPEAR;SICINPRESS= 4HEANALYSTSTREATMENT
OFANUTTERANCEAS@APOSSIBLE8ISTHENGROUNDEDINACLAIMABOUTITSHAVING
SUCHASTATUSFORTHEPARTICIPANTS&ORANEXTENDEDEXPLORATIONOFHOWAFORM
OF TURN CONSTRUCTIONREPETITIONCAN CONSTITUTE A PRACTICE FOR PRODUCING
POSSIBLEINSTANCESOFAPREVIOUSLYUNDESCRIBEDACTION@CONlRMINGALLUSIONS
CF3CHEGLOFFB

2EFERENCES
!LBERT%h2HETORICvh,OGICvANDh0OETICSvIN"URUNDICULTURAL
PATTERNINGOFSPEECHBEHAVIORv)N4HEETHNOGRAPHYOFCOMMUNICATION
3PECIAL ISSUE OF THE !MERICAN !NTHROPOLOGIST  VOL  EDITED BY
* * 'UMPERZ AND $ (YMES n -ENASHA 7) 'EORGE "ANTA
0UBLISHING
$ADEN)AND--C#LARENND3AMETURNREPAIRIN1UICHE-AYA
#ONVERSATION!NINITIALREPORT5NPUBLISHEDPAPER$EPARTMENTOF
!NTHROPOLOGY5NIVERSITYOF#ALIFORNIA,OS!NGELES
$URANTI !  0OLYPHONIC DISCOURSE /VERLAPPING IN 3AMOAN
CEREMONIALGREETINGS4EXTn
&OX"!-(AYASHIAND2*ASPERSON2ESOURCESANDREPAIR!
CROSS LINGUISTICSTUDYOFSYNTAXANDREPAIR)N)NTERACTIONANDGRAMMAR
EDITEDBY%/CHS%!3CHEGLOFFAND3!4HOMPSONn
#AMBRIDGE#AMBRIDGE5NIVERSITY0RESS

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

'ARlNKEL(3TUDIESINETHNOMETHODOLOGY%NGLEWOOD#LIFFS.*

0RENTICE (ALL
'OFFMAN%"EHAVIORINPUBLICPLACES.OTESONTHESOCIALORGANIZATION
OFGATHERING.EW9ORK&REE0RESS
  4HE INTERACTION ORDER !MERICAN 3OCIOLOGICAL 2EVIEW n

)NGE 7  4HE DARK AT THE TOP OF THE STAIRS .EW 9ORK 2ANDOM
(OUSE
*EFFERSON'.OTESONSOMEORDERLINESSESOFOVERLAPONSET)N
$ISCOURSE ANALYSIS AND NATURAL RHETORICS EDITED BY 6 $5RSO AND 0
,EONARDIn0ADOVA#,%50%DITORE
.OTESONhLATENCYvINOVERLAPONSET(UMAN3TUDIESn

  ! 3KETCH OF SOME ORDERLY ASPECTS OF OVERLAP IN ORDINARY
CONVERSATION)N#ONVERSATIONANALYSIS3TUDIESFROMTHElRSTGENERATION
EDITEDBY',ERNERn!MSTERDAM"ENJAMINS
,ERNER'(/NTHESYNTAXOFSENTENCES IN PROGRESS,ANGUAGE
IN3OCIETYn
/NTHEhSEMI PERMEABLEvCHARACTEROFGRAMMATICALUNITS
INCONVERSATION#ONDITIONALENTRYINTOTHETURNSPACEOFANOTHER
SPEAKER)N)NTERACTIONANDGRAMMAREDITEDBY%/CHS%!3CHEGLOFF
AND 3 ! 4HOMPSON n #AMBRIDGE #AMBRIDGE 5NIVERSITY
0RESS
4URN SHARING4HECHORALCO PRODUCTIONOFTALKININTERACTION
)N4HELANGUAGEOFTURNANDSEQUENCEEDITEDBY#!&ORD"!&OX
AND3!4HOMPSONn/XFORD/XFORD5NIVERSITY0RESS
3ELECTINGNEXTSPEAKER4HECONTEXT SENSITIVEOPERATIONOF
ACONTEXT FREEORGANIZATION,ANGUAGEIN3OCIETYn
2EISMAN+#ONTRAPUNTALCONVERSATIONSINAN!NTIGUANVILLAGE
)N%XPLORATIONSINTHEETHNOGRAPHYOFSPEAKINGEDITEDBY2"AUMAN
AND*3HERZERn#AMBRIDGE#AMBRIDGE5NIVERSITY0RESS
3ACKS(A!NINITIALINVESTIGATIONOFTHEUSABILITYOFCONVERSATIONAL
DATAFORDOINGSOCIOLOGY)N3TUDIESINSOCIALINTERACTIONEDITEDBY$
.3UDNOWn.EW9ORK&REE0RESS
B/NTHEANALYZABILITYOFSTORIESBYCHILDREN)N$IRECTIONS
INSOCIOLINGUISTICS4HEETHNOGRAPHYOFCOMMUNICATIONEDITEDBY**
'UMPERZ AND $ (YMES n .EW 9ORK (OLT 2INEHART AND
7INSTON
,ECTURESON#ONVERSATIONEDITEDBY'*EFFERSONVOLS7ITH
INTRODUCTIONSBY%!3CHEGLOFF/XFORD"LACKWELL



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

3ACKS(AND%!3CHEGLOFF4WOPREFERENCESINTHEORGANIZATION

OFREFERENCETOPERSONSANDTHEIRINTERACTION)N%VERYDAYLANGUAGE
3TUDIESINETHNOMETHODOLOGYEDITEDBY'0SATHASn.EW9ORK
)RVINGTON0UBLISHERS
3ACKS(%!3CHEGLOFFAND'*EFFERSON!SIMPLESTSYSTEMATICS
FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF TURN TAKING FOR CONVERSATION ,ANGUAGE
n
3CHEGLOFF%!3EQUENCINGINCONVERSATIONALOPENINGS!MERICAN
!NTHROPOLOGIST n
.OTESONACONVERSATIONALPRACTICE&ORMULATINGPLACE)N
3TUDIES IN SOCIAL INTERACTION EDITED BY $ . 3UDNOW n .EW
9ORK&REE0RESS
4HERELEVANCEOFREPAIRFORSYNTAX FOR CONVERSATION)N3YNTAX
ANDSEMANTICS$ISCOURSEANDSYNTAXEDITEDBY4'IVNn
.EW9ORK!CADEMIC0RESS
$ISCOURSEASANINTERACTIONALACHIEVEMENT3OMEUSESOFhUH
HUHvANDOTHERTHINGSTHATCOMEBETWEENSENTENCES)N'EORGETOWN
5NIVERSITY ROUNDTABLE ON LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS  !NALYZING
DISCOURSE 4EXT AND TALK EDITED BY $ 4ANNEN n 7ASHINGTON
$#'EORGETOWN5NIVERSITY0RESS
4HEROUTINEASACHIEVEMENT(UMAN3TUDIESn
A!NALYZINGSINGLEEPISODESOFINTERACTION!NEXERCISEIN
CONVERSATIONANALYSIS3OCIAL0SYCHOLOGY1UARTERLY n
B"ETWEENMACROANDMICRO#ONTEXTSANDOTHERCONNECTIONS
)N4HEMICRO MACROLINKEDITEDBY*!LEXANDER"'IESEN2-UNCH
AND.3MELSERn"ERKELEY5NIVERSITYOF#ALIFORNIA0RESS
'OFFMANANDTHEANALYSISOFCONVERSATION)N%RVING'OFFMAN
%XPLORING THE INTERACTION ORDER EDITED BY 0 $REW AND ! 7OOTTON
n#AMBRIDGE0OLITY0RESS
2EmECTIONSONLANGUAGEDEVELOPMENTANDTHEINTERACTIONAL
CHARACTEROFTALK IN INTERACTION)N)NTERACTIONINHUMANDEVELOPMENT
EDITED BY - "ORNSTEIN AND * 3 "RUNER n (ILLSDALE .*
%RLBAUM
/NTHEORGANIZATIONOFSEQUENCESASASOURCEOFhCOHERENCEvIN
TALK IN INTERACTION)N#ONVERSATIONALORGANIZATIONANDITSDEVELOPMENT
EDITEDBY"$ORVALn.ORWOOD.*!BLEX0UBLISHING
A)NTRODUCTION)N,ECTURESON#ONVERSATIONVOL(3ACKS
AUTHOREDITEDBY'*EFFERSONIXnLXII/XFORD"LACKWELL
B2EPAIRAFTERNEXTTURNTHELASTSTRUCTURALLYPROVIDEDPLACE
FORTHEDEFENSEOFINTERSUBJECTIVITYINCONVERSATION!MERICAN*OURNAL
OF3OCIOLOGY n

)NTERACTIONAND3OCIALITY 

 A #ONlRMING ALLUSIONS 4OWARD AN EMPIRICAL ACCOUNT OF

ACTION!MERICAN*OURNALOF3OCIOLOGY n
B)SSUESOFRELEVANCEFORDISCOURSEANALYSIS#ONTINGENCYIN
ACTIONINTERACTIONANDCO PARTICIPANTCONTEXT)N#OMPUTATIONALAND
CONVERSATIONAL DISCOURSE "URNING ISSUES!N INTERDISCIPLINARY ACCOUNT
EDITED BY % ( (OVY AND $ 3COTT n (EIDELBERG 3PRINGER
6ERLAG
C3OME0RACTICESFOR2EFERRINGTO0ERSONSIN4ALK IN )NTERACTION
!0ARTIAL3KETCHOFA3YSTEMATICS)N3TUDIESINANAPHORAEDITEDBY"
!&OXn!MSTERDAM"ENJAMINS
 D 4URN ORGANIZATION /NE INTERSECTION OF GRAMMAR AND
INTERACTION )N )NTERACTION AND GRAMMAR EDITED BY % /CHS % !
3CHEGLOFF AND 3 ! 4HOMPSON n #AMBRIDGE #AMBRIDGE
5NIVERSITY0RESS
  0RACTICES AND ACTIONS "OUNDARY CASES OF OTHER INITIATED
REPAIR$ISCOURSE0ROCESSESn
A/NGRANULARITY!NNUAL2EVIEWOF3OCIOLOGYn
B/VERLAPPINGTALKANDTHEORGANIZATIONOFTURN TAKINGFOR
CONVERSATION,ANGUAGEIN3OCIETY n
C7HENhOTHERSvINITIATEREPAIR!PPLIED,INGUISTICS n

!CCOUNTSOFCONDUCTININTERACTION)NTERRUPTIONOVERLAP
AND TURN TAKING )N (ANDBOOK OF SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY EDITED BY * (
4URNERn.EW9ORK0LENUM0RESS
INPRESS3EQUENCEORGANIZATIONININTERACTION!PRIMERINCONVERSATION
ANALYSIS)#AMBRIDGE#AMBRIDGE5NIVERSITY0RESS
 NDA !N )NTRODUCTION TO 4URN 4AKING 5NPUBLISHED -3
$EPARTMENTOF3OCIOLOGY5NIVERSITYOF#ALIFORNIA,OS!NGELES
NDB3EQUENCEORGANIZATION5NPUBLISHED-3$EPARTMENTOF
3OCIOLOGY5NIVERSITYOF#ALIFORNIA,OS!NGELES
3CHEGLOFF%!'*EFFERSONAND(3ACKS4HEPREFERENCEFOR
SELF CORRECTIONINTHEORGANIZATIONOFREPAIRINCONVERSATION,ANGUAGE
 n
3CHEGLOFF % ! AND ( 3ACKS  /PENING UP CLOSINGS 3EMIOTICA
n
3COLLON2AND33COLLON.ARRATIVELITERACYANDFACEININTERETHNIC
COMMUNICATION.ORWOOD.*!BLEX
3IDNELL *  #ONVERSATIONAL TURN TAKING IN A #ARIBBEAN %NGLISH
#REOLE*OURNALOF0RAGMATICS n
3PERBER$AND$7ILSON2ELEVANCE#OMMUNICATIONANDCOGNITION
#AMBRIDGE-!(ARVARD5NIVERSITY0RESS



0ROPERTIES OF (UMAN )NTERACTION

4ERASAKI ! +  0RE ANNOUNCEMENT SEQUENCES IN CONVERSATION

)N#ONVERSATIONANALYSIS3TUDIESFROMTHElRSTGENERATIONEDITEDBY'
,ERNERn!MSTERDAM"ENJAMINS