RULE 35- SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1.) Nocom vs. Camerino G.R. no. 182984, February 10, 2009
Facts:
Respondent Oscar Camerino and respondents-intervenors Efren Camerino, Cornelio Mantile, the deceased Nolasco Del
Rosario, represented by Mildred Del Rosario, and Domingo Enriquez were the tenants who were tilling on the parcels of land
planted to rice and corn previously owned by Victoria Homes, Inc. Respondent Oscar Camerino and respondentsintervenors Efren Camerino, Cornelio Mantile, the deceased Nolasco Del Rosario, represented by Mildred Del Rosario, and
Domingo Enriquez were the tenants who were tilling on the parcels of land planted to rice and corn previously owned by
Victoria Homes, Inc. It was registered with the Registry of Deeds of Rizal and new titles were issued in the name of SMSC.
Subsequently, SMSC mortgaged to Banco Filipino (BF) the said lots as collaterals for its loans. SMSC failed to pay the loans
due, Banco Filipino extrajudicially foreclosed the mortgaged. May 10, 2000 SMSC redeemed the lots from Banco FIlipino.
Respondents then, filed a complaint against SMSC and Banco Filipino with the RTC of Muntinlupa City, Branch 256.
On January 25, 2002, the RTC of Muntinlupa City, Branch 256, found respondents to be tenants who have been tilling on the
subject land planted to rice and corn since 1967 and, thus, authorized them to redeem the subject lots. CA affirmed with
the RTC's decision as well as the Supreme Court.