Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Early Childhood
Task 3: Assessment Commentary
Being about to hear and listen to each other, the children had to think and use processing skills
to see if they had any statements that would work with the one that was read. Collaborating
together helped children learn how to discuss and talk to each other by taking turns, asking
questions and responding to each other. In the small group video from task 2, one of the boys
was able to self-correct himself when he said the wrong definition for effect. I helped him realize
that the student before had just given that same definition for cause so his answer could not be
correct. Then he realized the right definition without any more help from me. The cause and
effect statements were situations that were realistic. This helped children make text to selfconnections because some of these situations could have happened to the children at home or
in school. For example, there was one statement that said Martha was cleaning the floor
because the baby spilled juice. This was one that children could relate to because more than
likely something at home was spilled and cleaned up. By reading the sentences out loud,
children were able to recognize cause and effect statements in front of them and connect the
statements together to form a sentence.]
d. Analyze the patterns of learning for the 2 focus children. Reference the 3 sources of
evidence you collected for each of the 2 focus children.
Consider childrens strengths (what children understand and do well), and areas of
learning that need attention (e.g., common errors, confusions, need for greater
challenge).
[The two focus children were in the small group video from task two. Focus child one is wearing
a bright green sweatshirt with glasses and focus child two is wearing a navy blue and grey shirt.
Both of the children did well with the common assessment. Focus child two is a struggling
reader, but he was able to read the statements fine. Focus child one is more advanced on is
placed in the highest leveled group for math and reading. During the small group video, focus
child two put the effect in the wrong spot, but then he self-corrected when he saw that there was
a period at the end of the sentence so they he knew it had to be an effect. Knowing that effect
comes at the end and cause comes before helped him fix his mistake. It took focus child two a
while to read his sentences and figure out if his went with the one that was read. He seemed
shy and was not positive if he had the right answers so he would wait a little until no one said
anything and then would say his statement. He seemed unconfident in his answers when he
was usually right. Focus child one did very well with the common assessment but he was
confused when trying to recall the definition of effect. With re-direction he was able to remember
the correct definition. One time focus child one had both the cause and effect statements and
looked at them and chose the wrong statements to go together. I guided him, in saying that
there was a better answer in front of him and then realized it and changed his original answer.
Focus child one made another error when he tried pairing a cause and effect that did not make
sense. Quickly after he said the statement, focus child two said the correct statement and focus
child one was able to see that his answer did not make sense. Focus child one did fine with the
rest of the assessment and was able to know which statement was the cause and which was
the effect. Overall, both children did well, but focus child 1 seemed more confident in knowing
his answers than focus child two. Focus child 2 seemed unsure at times when focus child one
was confident in his answers. Focus child one was still engaged in the activity but after a
couple of sentences were made, he needed a greater challenge, where the other children were
still struggling a bit with the cause and effect. Through this assessment, I was able to take
observational notes. Focus child one had a clearer understanding of the concept. You were
able to see this by him placing the statements under the correct column each time. Focus child
two seemed a little unfocused in the beginning of the activity but as the activity went on he was
more engaged. Focus child two also was able to change is original answer to the correct on
during the assessment. For the notes that were taken, both focus children were able to
Copyright 2015 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
2 of 8 | 10 pages maximum
All rights reserved.
V4_0915
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is
permitted only pursuant to the terms of a written license agreement.
Early Childhood
Task 3: Assessment Commentary
collaborate well with each other and follow directions. Focus child one showed a little
inappropriate behavior when saying the wrong answer on purpose to be funny but that was
addressed when giving feedback.]
e. If video or audio evidence of learning or a video or audio work sample occurs in a group
context (e.g., discussion), provide the name of the clip and clearly describe how the
scorer can identify the focus children (e.g., position, physical description) whose work is
portrayed.
[When looking at the video, focus child 1 is on the right side of the girl. Focus child 1 is the boy
wearing the bright green sweatshirt and glasses. When looking at the camera, focus child 2 is
the left of the girl. Focus child 2 has bright blonde hair and is wearing a grey and navy blue
shirt.]
2. Feedback to Guide Further Learning
Refer to specific evidence of submitted feedback to support your explanations.
a. Identify the format in which you submitted your evidence of feedback for the 2 focus
children. (Delete choices that do not apply.)
Written directly on work samples or in separate documents that were provided to the
focus children
Early Childhood
Task 3: Assessment Commentary
feedback they might not always read it. This way I was able to pull aside the children separately
and explain what they were and were not able to do in the activity. Before I gave them mine
feedback, I asked the children how they think they did with the activity and asked them if they
truly understood cause and effect. After discussing with them, I then read them my feedback
and asked if they had any questions. Even though I did this with both focus children, I mainly
did it because focus child 2 who is a struggling reader. Focus child 2 might have had trouble
reading the feedback and comments on the paper I handed back. This way I was able to tell
him directly and ask him questions to check for further understanding. When talking to focus
child 1 who is a more advanced student, I was able to discuss more in-depth feedback and ask
him harder questions to check for further comprehension. I asked both children to reflect on
their performance on the activity in the beginning, which was used to challenge focus child 1 to
use refection as a tool. I used reflection as a tool for both focus children even though it was to
advance focus child 1s learning. Reflection is a great tool to involve children in their own work.
With both focus children, I made sure to mainly have positive feedback besides mentioning what
they did wrong or needed to work on. When giving the verbal feedback from the video, I helped
both children understand that they were making right decisions by saying I agreed with them by
giving me thumbs up or down. When they would put the statements in the wrong column I would
wait for them to realize that it was incorrect and then they would fix it on their own. There was
never a situation where the children did not fix their own mistakes. When giving feedback to
focus child 2, I did mention that in the video he had put the statement in the wrong column and
then fixed it, which was great. I gave him positive feedback on why fixing his mistake was OK.
Providing verbal and written feedback helped address both of the focus childrens needs. By
going deeper into why and how questions with focus child 1 helped strengthen his learning.
Reading and pointing at specific comments on the paper to focus child 2, helped him
comprehend the feedback I was giving to him.]
c. Describe how you will support each focus child to understand and use this feedback to
further their learning related to learning objectives, either within the learning segment or
at a later time.
[To further both childrens learning, I asked them to reflect on their performance when I provided
feedback. Doing this first before given them the written feedback and then reading it to them
lets them have time to reflect. This is a great tool for students to be able to analyze their own
work. It involves them in the process of feedback and then lets them really think about their
performance. Being able to share their strengths and weaknesses shows me that they
understand what they did wrong and what they were able to accomplish. Sharing the written
feedback that they did well working with others and showed appropriate behavior will let them
know that they should act the in the same way in the future when collaborating with peers. Also
when ever a cause and effect is mentioned they should be able to remember the feedback
given and what they reflected on to help them recall the information needed. When teaching
about cause and effect again, I will ask each focus child specific questions that related to their
feedback to check for understanding. Hopefully, both children will be able to learn from their
mistakes and gain from their accomplishments and use the information in the learning segment
to connect to experiences or other learning topics in class.]
3. Evidence of Vocabulary Understanding and Use
When responding to the prompt below, use concrete examples from the video clips and/or
childrens work samples as evidence. Evidence from the video clips may focus on one or
more children.
Early Childhood
Task 3: Assessment Commentary
a. Explain how children were able to use the key vocabulary1 to support their learning of the
content.
For prompt 3a, refer to the evidence of childrens vocabulary use from ONE,
TWO, OR ALL THREE of the following sources:
1. Video clips from Instruction Task 2 and time-stamp references for evidence of
vocabulary use
2. Additional video file named Vocabulary Use of no more than 5 minutes in
length and cited vocabulary use (this can be footage of one or more children).
See Assessment Task 3 specifications in the Early Childhood Evidence Chart
for acceptable file types. Submit the video clip in Assessment Task 3, Part C.
3. Childrens work samples analyzed in Assessment Task 3 and cited
vocabulary use
[In the small group video from task two and learning experience two, the children are asked to
recall the definitions of cause and effect in the beginning of the video (00:11 - 00:24) and the
end of the video (05:45 6:14). They are also asked to do the sign language that goes along
with the words what and why related to cause and effect. Throughout the small group video,
children are asked to recognize if the statement they read is a cause or effect. They have to use
the vocabulary words to answer the question. They also have to think before they answer and
try to remember the definitions to see what column to put the statement under. In the entire
video children are asked to use the vocabulary to clearly identify which statement is the cause
and which is the effect to create an appropriate sentence that makes sense. In the whole-class
video from task two and learning experience three, children are asked recall the vocabulary
definitions and sign language. As a whole-class we say the definitions out loud and do the sign
language along with it (01:27 01:36). As the experiment is introduced to the children, they are
asked to identify what the cause and effect was of putting the egg in vinegar for twenty-four
hours. The children have to use the vocabulary to identify what the cause and effect was of the
experiment (03:10-05:08). Then, when I popped the egg, they had to identify what the cause
and effect was again. Again, children had to think what the vocabulary words meant and then
apply it to a situation (05:31-06:21).]
4. Using Assessment to Inform Instruction
a. Based on your analysis of childrens learning presented in prompts 1bc, describe next
steps for instruction:
This vocabulary was identified in Planning Task 1 and refers to developmentally appropriate sounds, words, phrases,
sentences, and paragraphs that children use or create to engage in the learning experience.
Early Childhood
Task 3: Assessment Commentary
Early Childhood
Task 3: Assessment Commentary
turns building sentences from the statement until they are done. Once they are finished, they
can re-check their statements and glue them on the construction paper. After all of these steps,
the children may turn it in. Students will be assessed using the rubric below.
Collaboration
Students
demonstrate
appropriate
behavior
when
working
together.
Students
are
struggling
working
together
and cannot
agree.
Students do
not
demonstrate
appropriate
behavior
when
working
together.
Possible
Points
/2
Directions
Students
follow all
directions.
Students
follow some
directions
but leave
out steps.
Students do
not follow
directions.
/2
Correct
Cause and
Effect
Statements
Students
have all
correct
cause and
effect
statements.
Students
have half of
the cause
and effect
statements
correct.
Students
have no
correct
cause and
effect
statements.
/2
Comments
Early Childhood
Task 3: Assessment Commentary
/6