Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
COURSE SYLLABUS
Course Title:
CIVIL PROCEDURE
No. of Units: 4 Semester: 2nd
Department/Track: REMEDIAL LAW
I.
COURSE DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES
A study of Rules 1-71 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure (effective 1 July 1997). The course
starts with a review of the differences between substantive and remedial law, the basic
principles of jurisdiction, and the power of the Supreme Court to promulgate the Rules of
Court. The course involves the analysis of the relevant rules, jurisprudence, and related laws
governing procedure in civil cases, provisional remedies, and special civil actions. Upon
completion of the course, students are expected to have a strong fundamental knowledge
and understanding of the Rules of Court that will enable them to successfully hurdle the Bar
Exams and eventually be capable law practitioners.
II.
3.
Baritua vs. Mercader, 350 SCRA 86
4.
Abrenica vs. Abrenica, G.R. No. 169420, 502 SCRA 614
5.
Paloma vs. Mora, 470 SCRA 711
6.
Quesada vs. DOJ, 500 SCRA 454
7.
Ngo Bun Tiong vs. Judge Sayo, 163 SCRA 237
8.
Ella vs. Salonga 35 SCRA 86
9.
Villamor vs. Salas, 203 SCRA 540
10. Dela Rosa vs. Roldan, 501 SCRA 34
11. Tijam vs. Sibonghanoy, 23 SCRA 29
12. Calimlim vs. Ramirez, 118 SCRA 399
13. De la Cruz vs. Court of Appeals, 510 SCRA 103
14. Sta. Clara Homeowners vs. Gaston, 374 SCRA 396
15. Sun Insurance Office vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274
16. Ballatan vs. Court of Appeals, 304 SCRA 34
17. Yuchengco vs. Republic, 333 SCRA 368
18. Vda. De Murga vs. Chan, 25 SCRA 441 (1968)
19. Heirs of Valeriano Concha vs. Spouses Gregorio Lumocso, 540 SCRA 1
20. Agustinvs.Bacalan,135SCRA340
21. Mangaliag vs. Catubig-Pastoral, 474 SCRA 153
22. Sps. Bejer vs. CA, G.R. No. 79404, January 27, 1989
23. Zamora vs. Heirs of Carmen, G.R. No. 146195, November 18, 2004
24. Aquino vs. Abre, February 18, 2008
25. Baares, et al. vs. Balising, et al, G.R. No. 132624, March 13, 2000
26. Diaz vs. Gestopa, A.M.-MTJ-11-1786, June 22, 2011
B. General Provisions
1.
Real Action and Personal Action, distinguished
2.
Action in Personam, Action in Rem, & Action Quasi in Rem, distinguished
Required Readings
Laws: Rule 1 General Provisions - 1 to 6
Cases:
1.
Y u vs. Pacleb,
580 SCRA
197
2.
Domagas vs. Jensen, 448 SCRA 663
3.
Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 315 SCRA 600
4.
Tamano vs. Ortiz, 291 SCRA 584
5.
La Tondea Distillers vs. Ponferrada, 264 SCRA 540
6.
Cabutihan vs. Landcenter Construction, 383 SCRA 353
7.
Citizen Surety vs. Melencio-Herrera, 38 SCRA 369
8.
Go vs. UCPB, G.R. No. 156187, 442 SCRA 264
9.
Gochan vs. Gochan 372 SCRA 356
10. Manchester Development Corp. vs. CA, 149 SCRA 562
11. Sun Insurance Office vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274
12. Tacoy vs. RTC of Tagum, 180 SCRA 433
13. AyalaCorp.vs.Madayag, 181 SCRA 687
14. Negros Oriental Planters Association vs. Hon. Presiding Judge of Negros, 575 SCRA575
C. Cause of Action
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 2 Cause of Action - 1 to 6
Cases:
1. Joseph vs. Bautista, February 23, 1989
2. Monzon vs. Spouses Relova vs. Addio Properties, Inc., 565 SCRA 514
3. Philippine National Construction Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, 514 SCRA 569 4.
5. Viewmaster Construction Corporation vs. Roxas, 335 SCRA 540
6. San Lorenzo Village Association, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 288 SCRA 115
7. Zepeda vs. China Banking Corporation, 504 SCRA 126
8. Sea-Land Service, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 327 SCRA 135
9. Lorbes vs. Court of Appeals, 351 SCRA 716
10. Progressive Development Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, 301 SCRA 637
11. Flores vs. Mallare-Philipps, 144 SCRA 377
D. Parties to Civil Actions
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 3 Parties to Civil Actions - 1 to 11
2.
Art. 44 of the New Civil Code of the Philippines
Cases:
1.
Rayo vs. Metrobank, 539 SCRA 571
2.
PNB vs. Megaprime Realty, 567 SCRA 633
3.
Aguila vs. Court of Appeals, 319 SCRA 345
4.
Viason Enterprises vs. CA, 310 SCRA 26
5.
Agro-Conglomerates vs. CA, 348 SCRA 450
6.
Co vs. Acosta, 134 SCRA 185
7.
Samaniego vs. Aguila, 334 SCRA 438
8. Domingo vs. Scheer, 421 SCRA 468
9.
Plasabas vs. Court of Appeals, 582 SCRA 686
10. Erna Casals, et al vs. Tayud Golf and Country Club, 593 SCRA 468
11. Senator Pimentel, et al vs. Senate Committee, G.R. No. 187714, March 8, 2011
12. Kilosbayan vs. Guingona, G.R. No. 113375, May 5, 1994
13. Velarde vs. Social Justice Society, G.R. No. 159357, April 8, 2004
E. Parties to Civil Actions
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 3 Parties to Civil Actions - 12 to 22
Cases:
1.
Mathay vs. Consolidated Bank and Trust Co., 58 SCRA 559
2.
Ortigas & Co. vs. Ruiz, 148 SCRA 326
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
2008
F. Venue of Actions
Required Readings Laws:
1. Rule4 VenueofActions-1to4
2.
Rule 110, 15, Rules on Criminal Procedure
3.
5 R.A. No. 8369 (Family Courts Act)
4.
4, A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC
5.
2(c), A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC
Cases:
1.
Nocum vs. Tan, 470 SCRA 639
2.
Dacoycoy vs. IAC, G.R. No. 74854, April 2, 1991
3.
United Overseas Bank Phils. Vs. Rosemoore Mining, 518 SCRA 123
4.
Polytrade Corporation vs. Blanco, 30 SCRA 187
5.
Anita Mangila vs. Court of Appeals, 387 SCRA 162
6.
Spouses Lantin vs. Lantion, 499 SCRA 718
7.
Sweetlines vs. Teves, May 19, 1978
8.
Unimasters Conglomeration, Inc. vs. CA, 267 SCRA 759
9.
Pacific Consultants vs. Schonfeld, 516 SCRA 209
10. Hyatt Elevators vs. Goldstar Elevators, G.R. No. 161026, October 24, 2005
G. Uniform Procedure in Trial Courts and Kinds of Pleadings
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 5 Uniform Procedure in Trial Courts - 1 and 2
2.
Rule 6 Kinds of Pleadings - 1 to 13
a.
4 to 6, 9, 19 to 20 of 1991 Revised Rule on Summary Procedure
b.
5 to 7, 11, 13 to 14 of Rule of Procedure for Small Claims
Cases:
1.
International Container Terminal Services, Inc. vs. CA, 214 SCRA 456
2.
Metals Engineering Resources Corp. vs. CA, 203 SCRA 273
3.
Financial Bldg. Corp. vs. Forbes Park, G.R. No. 133119, August 17, 2000
4.
Pinga vs. Heirs of Santiago, G.R. No. 170354, 494 SCRA 393
5.
Santo Tomas University Hospital vs. Surla, 294 SCRA 382
6.
Torres vs. CA, G.R. No. L-25889, January 17, 1973, 49 SCRA 674
7.
Anaya vs. Palaroa, 36 SCRA 97 (1970)
8.
Balbastro, et al. vs. CA, 48 SCRA 232 (1972)
9.
Rubio vs. Mariano, 52 SCRA 338 (1973)
4.
Ponciano vs. Parentela, 331 SCRA 605, May 9, 2000
5.
Gojo vs. Goyala, 35 SCRA 557
6.
Liam Law vs. Olympic Sawmill CO. And Elino Lee Chi, G.R. No. L-30771, May 28,
1984
7.
Meliton vs. CA, 216 SCRA 485
8.
Korea Technologies Co. Ltd. Vs. Lerma, 542 SCRA 1
9.
Cavili vs. Florendo, 154 SCRA 610
10. Gajudo vs. Traders Royal Bank, 485 SCRA 108
11. Pascua vs. Florendo, 136 SCRA 208
12. Laus vs. CA, 219 SCRA 688
13. Philippine British Co. Inc. vs. delos Angeles, 63 SCRA 50
14. De Guia vs. De Guia, 356 SCRA 287
15. Lina vs. Court of Appeals, 35 SCRA 637
16. Torres vs. CA, 49 SCRA 67
17. Lorbes vs. CA, 351 SCRA 716
Rule 11
1.
Naga Development Corporation vs. CA, 41 SCRA 105
2.
Amante vs. Sunga, 64 SCRA 192
3.
Sarmiento vs. Juan, 120 SCRA 403
4.
Barraza vs. Campos, 120 SCRA 881
5.
Luna vs. Mirafuente, A.M. No. MTJ-05-1610, September 26, 2005
K. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 10 Amended and Supplemental Pleadings - 1 to 8
Cases:
1.
Paeste vs. Jaurigue, 94 Phil 179
2.
Bautista vs. Maya-Maya Cottages, Inc., 476 SCRA 416
3.
Alpine Lending Investors vs. Corpuz, 508 SCRA 45
4.
Siasoco vs. CA, 303 SCRA 186
5.
Philippine Ports Authority vs. WG&A, January 28, 2008
6.
Campos Rueda vs. Bautista, 6 SCRA 240
7.
Gumabay vs. Baralin, 77 SCRA 258
8.
Azola Farms vs. CA, 442 SCRA 133
9.
Verzosa vs. CA, 299 SCRA 100
10. Swagman Hotels and Travel, Inc. vs. CA, 455 SCRA 175
11. Magaspi vs. Ramolete, 115 SCRA 193
12. Mercader vs. DBP (Cebu Branch), 332 SCRA 82
13. Youngvs.SpousesSy, 503 SCRA 151
L. Bill of Particulars
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 12 Bill of Particulars - 1 to 6
Cases:
1.
Go Occo & Co vs. De La Costa, 63 Phil 445
2.
Santos vs. Liwag, 101 SCRA 327
3.
Filipinas Fabricators & Sales Inc. vs. Magsino, 157 SCRA 467
4.
Dumanon vs. Butuan City Rural Bank, 119 SCRA 193
5.
Baritua vs. Mercader, 350 SCRA 86
M. Filing and Service of Pleadings, etc.
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 13 Filing and Service of Pleadings, etc. - 1 to 14
2.
1 Rule 26
Cases:
1.
De Los Santos vs. Elizalde, 514 SCRA 14
2.
De Leon vs. CA, 383 SCRA 216
3.
Duque vs. CA, G.R. No. 125383, July 2, 2002
4.
PHHC vs. Tiongco, 12 SCRA 471
5.
Marinduque Mining and Industrial Corp. vs. NAPOCOR, 567 SCRA 483
6.
United Pulp and Paper co. Inc. vs. United Pulp and Paper Chapter-Federation of Free
Workers, 426 SCRA 329, G.R. No. 141117, March 25, 2004
7.
MC Engineering, Inc. vs. NLRC, 360 SCRA 183
8.
Aberca, et al vs. Ver, G.R. No. 166216, March 14, 2012
9.
Alberto vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 119088, June 30, 2000
10. Romero vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 142406, May 16, 2005
N. Summons
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 14 Summons - 1 to 10
2.
Administrative Circular No. 59-SC, November 19, 1989
Cases:
1.
Umandap vs. Sabio, 339 SCRA 243
2.
Biaco vs. Philippine Countryside Rural Bank, 515 SCRA 106
3.
Toyota Cubao, Inc. vs. CA, 281 SCRA 198
4.
PCIBank vs. Alejandro, 533 SCRA 738
5.
Vlasons enterprises vs. CA, 310 SCRA 26
6.
Pagalaran vs. Bal-latan, 13 Phil 135
7.
Ong Peng vs. Custodio, 1 SCRA 780 or 13 Phil 135
8.
Atkins, Kroll, and Co. vs. Domingo, 44 Phil 680
9.
Bello vs. Ubo, G.R. No. L-30353, September 30, 1982
10. Filmerco Commercial Co. Inc. vs. IAC, 149 SCRA 194
11. Laus vs. CA, 219 SCRA 688
12. De Leon vs. Hontanosas, 67 SCRA 458
13. Carriaga vs. Malaya, 143 SCRA 441
14. Ablazavs.CIR,126 SCRA 254
O. Summons
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 14 Summons - 11-20
Cases:
1.
Delta Motor Sales Corp. vs. Mangosing, 70 SCRA 598
2.
E.B. Villarosa vs. Benito, 312 SCRA 65
3.
Paramount Insurance Corp. vs. AC Ordoez Corp., 561 SCRA 327
4.
Litton Mills, Inc. vs. CA, 256 SCRA 696
5.
Wang Laboratories vs. Mendoza, 156 SCRA 44
6.
Sahagun vs. CA, 198 SCRA 44
7.
Velayo-Fong vs. Spouses Velayo, 510 SCRA 320
8.
Jose vs. Boyon, 414 SCRA 216
9.
La Naval Drug Corp vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78
10. Boticano vs. Chu, 148 SCRA 541
11. Cezar vs. Ricafort-Bautista, 506 SCRA 322
12. UCPB vs. Ongpin, 368 SCRA 464
13. HSBC vs. Catalan, G.R. No 159590-1, October 18, 2004
14. Santos vs. PNOC Exploration Corporation, G.R. No. 170943, September 23, 2008
15. PCIB vs. Spouses Wilson Dy Hong Pi et al, G.R. No. 171137, June 5, 2009
16. NM Rothschild & Sons vs. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company, G.R. No. 175799,
November 28, 2011
P. Motions
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 15 Motions - 1 to 10 3,
Cases:
1.
Cledera vs. Sarmiento, 39 SCRA 552
2.
Vette Industrial Sales, Co., Inc. vs. Cheng, G.R.No. 170232-170301, December 5, 2006
3.
Boiser vs. Aguirre, Jr., 458 SCRA 430
4.
Andrada vs. CA, 60 SCRA 379
5.
Supreme Investment Corp. vs. Engineering Equipment, Inc, April 11, 1972
6. Davao Light & Power vs. CA, 204 SCRA 343
7.
Sarmiento vs. Zaratan, 514 SCRA 246
8.
Tuazon & Co. vs. Magdangal, 4 SCRA 84 (1962)
9.
Azajar vs. CA, 145 SCRA 333
Q. Motion to Dismiss
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 16 Motion to Dismiss - 1 to 6
Cases:
1.
De Dios vs. Bristol Laboratories, 55 SCRA 349
2.
Dalandan vs. Julio, 10 SCRA 400
3.
Marcopper Mining vs. Garcia, 143 SCRA 178
4.
La Naval Drug Corp. vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78
5.
Toyota Cubao vs. CA, 281 SCRA 198
6.
Duero vs. CA, 373 SCRA 11
7.
Leviton Industries vs. Salvador, 114 SCRA 420
8. Valencia vs. CA, 263 SCRA 275
9.
Pacsports Phils., Inc. vs. Niccolo Sports, G.R. No. 141602, November 22, 2001
10. Linzag vs. CA, 291 SCRA 304
11. Hacienda Bigaa, Inc. vs. Chavez, G.R. No. 174160, April 20, 2010
12. Fels Energy Inc. vs. Province of Batangas, G.R. No. 168557, February 19, 2007
13. Sempio vs. CA, 284 SCRA 580
R. Motion to Dismiss
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 16 Motion to Dismiss - 1 to 6
Cases:
1.
De Los Reyes vs. CA, 285 SCRA 705
2.
Aznar vs. Bernad, 161 SCRA 276
3.
Landayan vs. Bacani, 117 SCRA 117
4.
Dulay vs. CA, 243 SCRA
5.
Suyom vs. Collantes, 69 SCRA 514
6.
Tan vs. Director of Forestry, 125 SCRA 302
7.
Peregrina vs. Panis, 133 SCRA 729
8.
Pineda vs. CFI, 111 Phil 643 (1961)
9.
Y uvienco vs. Dacuycuy, 104 SCRA
668
10. Bank of America vs. CA, 400 SCRA 156
11. AssociatedBankvs.SpousesMontano, 604 SCRA 134
12. Lu Ym vs. Gertrudes Nabua, 452 SCRA 298
S. Dismissal of Actions
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 17 Dismissal of Actions - 1 to 4
Cases:
1.
Republic Planters Bank vs. Molina, 166 SCRA 36
2.
PCI Leasing Finance, Inc. vs. Milan, 617 SCRA 258
3.
Meliton vs. CA, 216 SCRA 485
4.
Pinga vs. Heirs of Santiago, 494 SCRA 393
T. Pre-Trial
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 18 Pre-Trial - 1 to 7
2.
7 and 8, Rule on Summary Procedure
3.
18 Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Cases
4.
5.
Cases:
1.
Martinez vs. De La Merced, 174 SCRA 182
2.
Sarmiento vs. Juan, 120 SCRA 403
3.
Paredes vs. Verano, 504 SCRA 264
4.
Tria vs. Lirag, G.R. No. L-13994, April 29, 1961
5.
Zagala vs. Jimenez, 152 SCRA 147
6.
Mercader vs. DBP (Cebu Branch), 332 SCRA 82
U. Intervention
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 19 Intervention - 1 to 4
Cases:
1.
Mactan Cebu International vs. Heirs of Minoza, February 2, 2011
2.
Big Country Ranch Corp vs. CA, 227 SCRA 161
3.
Barangay Matictic vs. Elbinias, 148 SCRA 83
4.
MBTC vs. Presiding Judge, G.R. No. 89909, September 21, 1990
5.
Batama Farmers Cooperative Marketing vs. Rosal, 42 SCRA 408
6.
Magsaysay-Labrador vs. CA, 180 SCRA 266
7.
Looyuko vs. CA, G.R. No. 102696, July 12, 2001
8.
Bon-Mar Realty vs. de Guzman, G.R. No. 182136, August 29, 2008
9.
Executive Secretary vs. Northeast Freight, 581 SCRA 76
V. Calendar of Cases, Subpoena, and Computation of Time
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 20 Calendar of Cases - 1 to 2
2.
Rule 21 Subpoena - 1 to 10
3.
Rule 22 Computation of Time - 1 to 2
Cases:
1.
People vs. Montejo, 21 SCRA 722
2.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Primetown Property, 531 SCRA 436
W. Depositions Pending Action and Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 23 Depositions Pending Action - 1 to 29
2.
Rule 24 Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal - 1 to 7
Cases:
1.
Fortune Corporation vs. CA, G.R. No. 108119, January 19, 1994
2.
Koh vs, IAC, September 23, 1986
3.
Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, November 21, 1991
4.
5.
6.
7.
BB. New Trial or Reconsideration and Relief from Judgments, Orders, and Other
Proceedings
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 37 New Trial or Reconsideration - 1 to 9
2.
Rule 38 Relief from Judgments, Orders, or Other Proceedings - 1 to 7
Cases:
1.
Neypes vs. CA, 469 SCRA 633
2.
Dacanay vs. Alvendia, 30 SCRA 31
3.
BA Finance Corp. vs. Pineda, December 29, 1982
4.
Lucas vs. Fabros, 324 SCRA 1
5.
Habaluyas Enterprises vs. Japson, 142 SCRA 208
6.
Cansino vs. CA, 409 SCRA 403
7.
Magno vs. CA, 107 SCRA 819
8.
Conde vs. IAC, 144 SCRA 144
9. Salazar vs. Salazar, 8 Phil 183
10. Ayllon vs. Sevilla, 156 SCRA 257
11. National Shipyards & Steel Corp vs. Asuncion, 103 Phil 630
12. Uy vs. First Metro Integrated Steel, September 27, 2006
13. Amil vs. CA, October 7, 1999
14. Ganaban vs. Boyle, 30 SCRA 365
15. Sayman vs. CA, February 21, 1983
16. Purcon, Jr. vs. MRM Philippines, Inc et al, G.R. No. 182718, September 26, 2008
17.Yusuke Fukuzumi vs. Sanritsu Great International Corp et al, G.R. No. 140630, August
12, 2004
18. Servicewide Specialist vs. Sheriff of Manila, G.R. No. 74586, October 17, 1986
19. PNB vs. Ortiz, May 29, 1987
20. Francisco vs. Puno, 108 SCRA 427
CC. Execution, Satisfaction and Effect of Judgments
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 39 Execution, Satisfaction and Effect of Judgements - 1 to 14
Cases:
1.
Pelejo vs. CA, 116 SCRA 406
2.
Napocor vs. Maruhom, 609 SCRA 198
3.
Fideldia vs. Songcuan, 465 SCRA 218
4. Fortune Guarantee and Insurance Corp. vs. CA, March 12, 2002
5.
Saligumba vs. Palanog, December 4, 2008
6.
Y au vs. Silverio,
February 4,
2008
7.
MMDA vs. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, 574 SCRA 661
8.
Evangelista vs. La Proveedora, 38 SCRA 379
9.
Valenzuela vs. de Aguilar, 8 SCRA 212
10. Delta Motors vs. CA, 168 SCRA 206
11. Philippine Surety and Insurance Co. vs. Zabal, 21 SCRA 682
12. De Leon vs. Salvador, 35 SCRA 567
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
6.
Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Fernando Pampanga vs. Soriano, et al, G.R. No.
153829 and G.R. No. 160909, August 17, 2011
7.
Medina vs. Judge Canon, A.M. RTJ-11-298, February 22, 2012
8.
Ortigas vs. CA G.R. No. 79128, June 16, 1983
9.
Merville Park Homeowners vs. Velez G.R. No. 82985, April 22, 1991
10. Buyco vs. Baraquia, G.R. No. 177486, December 21, 2009
11. Heirs of the late J.B.L. Reyes vs. CA 338 SCRA 282
12. Philippine National Bank vs. Ritratto Group, July 31, 2001
13. Brocka vs. Enrile 192 SCRA 182
14. Medina vs. Greenfield Development G.R. No. 140228, November 19, 2004
15. China Banking Corp vs. CA, December 5, 1996
16. Hutchinson Ports Phils. vs. SBMA, August 31, 2000
17. Nische vs. Equitable-PCI Bank, February 19, 2007
18. Director of the Bureau of Telecommunications vs. Aligaen L-31135, May 29, 1970
19. Aquinovs.SocorroG.R.No.23868,October22,1970
20. Zuo vs. Cabredo, A.M. No. RTJ-03-1779, 402 SCRA 75
21. Filipino Metals, Corp vs. Secretary of DTI, G.R. No. 157498, July 15, 2005
II. Receivership, Replevin, Support Pendente Lite, Interpleader, Declaratory Relief,
and Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of the Commission on
Elections and the Commission on Audit
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 59 Receivership
2.
Rule 60 Replevin
3.
Rule 61 Support Pendente Lite
a.
Articles 194, 195, 201, 202, Family Code of the Philippines
b.
A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC
4.
Rule 62 Interpleader
5.
Rule 63 Declaratory Relief
6.
Rule 64 - Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of the Commission
on Elections and the Commission on Audit
Cases:
Receivership
1.
Normandy vs. Duque 29 SCRA 385 (1969)
2.
Commodities Storage vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 125008, June 19, 1997
3.
De Los Reyes vs. Hon Bayona, March 29, 1960
4.
National Investment and Development Corp vs. Judge Aquino 163 SCRA 153, June
30, 1988
5.
Dolor vs. Sindiam L-27631, April 30, 1971
6.
Traders Royal Bank vs. Intermediate Appellate Court 273 SCRA 521, June 17, 1997
Replevin
Yang vs. Valdez 177 SCRA 141, August 31, 1989
Filinvest Credit Corp vs. CA, September 27, 1995
Adoma vs. Gatcheco 448 SCRA 299, January 27, 2005
Prohibition
1.
David vs. Rivera 420 SCRA 90, January 16, 2004
2.
Tan et al vs. COMELEC G.R. No. 73155, July 11, 1986
Mandamus
1.
Mayuga vs. CA, August 30, 1996
2.
Kant Wong et al vs. PCGG G.R. No. 79484, December 7, 1987
3.
Uy Kiao Eng vs. Nixon Lee, G.R. No. 176831, January 15, 2010
4.
Matibay vs. Garcia, January 25, 1983
5.
Paloma vs. Mora, 470 SCRA 711
6. MMDA vs. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, 574 SCRA 661, December 18, 2008
KK. Quo Warranto, Expropriation, Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage, Partition,
Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer and Contempt
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 66
Quo W arranto
2.
Rule 67 Expropriation
3.
Rule 68 Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage
a.
A.M. No. 99-10-05-0 (effective March 10, 2007)
b.
Act No. 3135 (Extra-judicial Foreclosure)
4.
Rule 69 Partition
5.
Rule 70 Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer
6.
Rule 71 - Contempt
Cases:
Quo Warranto
1.
Municipality of San Narciso vs. Mendez et al 239 SCRA 11, December 6, 1994
2.
Tarrosa vs. Singson 232 SCRA 553, May 25, 1994
3.
Lota vs. CA 2 SCRA 715, June 30, 1961
Expropriation
1.
Republic vs. Gingoyon G.R. No. 166429, December 19, 2005
2.
National Power Corp. vs. Manubay Agro-Industrial G.R. No. 150936, August 18, 2004
3.
Republic vs. CA and Heirs of Cris Santos G.R. No. 146587, July 2, 2002
4.
Jesus is Lord Christian School Foundation vs. City of Pasig G.R. No. 152230, August
9, 2005
5.
Robern Development Corp. vs. Quitain, 315 SCRA 150
6.
Republic vs. vda. De Castello, 58 SCRA 336
Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage
1.
Limpin vs. IAC 166 SCRA 88, September 29, 1988
2.
BPI Family Savings Bank vs. Sps Veloso 436 SCRA 1, August 9, 2004
Partition
1.
Figuracion Gerilla vs. vda. De Figuracion G.R. No. 154322, August 22, 2006
2.
Rugian vs. Rugian, 9 Phil 527 (1908)