Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1 ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Course name: Mechanics of Materials
Course Code: ENGI 23413
Contact Hours: 56.0 (4 hrs x 14 weeks)
Credit Value: 4.0
Effective: Winter 2016
Prerequisite: N/A
Course Lead: N/A
Professor: Mohammad Arefin
Email: mohammad.arefin@sheridancollege.ca
Office: C264, Phone: 5110
2 COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course is concerned with the stress and deformations caused by external loads applied to a
body. A body can be a part of a machine or a structure such as shafts, beams etc. With the help
of free-body-diagram and equations of equilibrium, the students will be taught various methods
of sectioning a body under stress and then analyze the stress and induced internal reactions of
such a structure. This course will familiarize students with methods as well as real-life challenges
of designing a part and/or member of a complex structure analyzing its loading conditions and
expected performance.
3.1 SOLVE
Assignment: solve a
problem or answer
conceptual questions
based on the
lecture/slides/textboo
k reading
Quiz: solve
problem(s) and
answer conceptual
question(s)
Lab: performing
Experiments in the
laboratory to
complement
understanding of the
theories taught in the
class
3.2 CALCULATE
Criteria
Outcome(
s)
addresse
d
3.1 and 3.2
3.1
Assignment:
solve a problem or
answer conceptual
questions based
on the
lecture/slides/text
book reading
3.3 DESIGN
Criteria
Outcom
e(s)
address
ed
SHAFTS,
KEYS,
3.1 and
3.2
AND BOLTED
Quiz: solve
problem(s)
and answer
conceptual
question(s)
Lab:
performing
Experiments
in the
laboratory to
complement
understanding
of the theories
Criteria
Outcom
e(s)
address
ed
3.1 and
3.3
3.1 and
3.3
taught in the
class
Mid-Term
Exam
3.4 EVALUATE
CRITICAL LOAD-BEARING
CAPACITIES
3.1, 3.2
and 3.3
OF BEAMS/COLUMNS
Quiz: solve
problem(s)
and answer
conceptual
question(s)
Lab:
performing
Experiments
in the
laboratory to
complement
Criteria
Outcom
e(s)
address
ed
3.1, 3.3
and 3.4
3.3 and
3.4
understanding
of the theories
taught in the
class
4 EVALUATION PLAN
Students are assessed through quizzes, assignments, tests/exams (mid-term), lab reports and
final exams. Each of these components has their own weight in the finalized grade. The
breakdowns are as follows:
4.1 MARKS
BREAK DOWN
Evaluation tool
Quiz/Assignment(s)1
Labs2
Mid-Term
Final Exam
Total
Description/number
Typically 5 (@3% each) or 6 (@2.5%
each) throughout the semester
Typically 5 (@4% each) or 4 labs (@5%
each)
Based on Modules (1 - 5)
Based on Modules (6-10)
% of Final
Grade
15
20
30
35
100
Regardless of the final total mark, students must obtain at least 50% on the exam/theory/test(s) and 50%
on the lab/project/assignment(s) components of this course in order to obtain a passing grade in this
course.
1 Please refer to the sections 3.1.2, 3.3.2 and 3.4.2 for definitions and structures of quiz and
assignments.
2 Please refer to the sections 3.1.2, 3.3.2 and 3.4.2 for definitions and structures of Labs
5 TOPICAL OUTLINE
Week
#
1-2
Jan 1215 &
19-22
3
Jan 26
- 29
4
Feb 25
5
Feb 912
6
Feb
16-19
Modul
e#
1
Evaluatio
n
Assignmen
t A1
(released
on W2)
Readings
Chapter
10
P 213 239
A1 based
on M1
Lab 1
Hooks
Law
Chapter
11
P 240 266
Quiz 1
Quiz 1
based on
M1
Assignmen
t A2
(released)
Chapter
12
P 267 283
Quiz 2
A2 based
on M2
Chapter
13
P 284 304
Q2 based
on M2
Lab 2
Shear
Strength
Chapter
10 - 13
7
Feb 23
8
Mar 14
9
Mar 811
10
Mar
15-18
No Classes
5+6
11
Mar
22-25
12
Mar 29
- Apr 1
13
Apr 5 Apr 8
14
Apr 12
- Apr
15
Chapter
10 - 13
Assignmen
t A3
Chapter
14
P 305 352
A3 based
on M5
Lab 3 Torsion
Chapter
15
P 353 399
Chapter
16
P 400 - 427
Lab 4
Deflection
of Beams
Chapter
16
P 400 427
Quiz 3
Chapter
17
P 428 438
Q3 based
on M5-8
6 RATIONALE
6.1 FOREWORDS
Mechanics of Materials is a course that is designed for helping students make effective
contributions in the engineering field as design engineers and/or technicians. The design
engineers are at the core of the engineering development who set the starting point of a
project/plant/venture. Therefore, their work is critical to the success of the project. Teaching
students the necessary concepts, tools, methods and technology is only part of the preparation.
Making sure that they will analyze and solve the problem(s) at hand correctly and efficiently and
also design and/or create prototypes in their future jobs, is a challenge that calls for careful
evaluation at the very high levels of Blooms Taxonomy (Bloom, Mesia, & Krathwohl, 1964).
6.2 THE
TEACHING/LEARNING METHOD
The teaching method adopted in this course is worth mentioning in this ongoing discussion the
course is designed to accommodate the problem-based learning styles (Bonwell & Eison, 1991)
and hence requires the students to work on problems taken from the real world and find
solutions to those problems by compiling their knowledge of the concepts, tools and various
methods that are industry-standard. Problem-based learning or PBL is also known as one of the
innovative and effective ways of teaching and learning (Maurer & Neuhold, 2012), especially for
large groups of learners in the science and technology fields (Duch, Groh, & Allen, 2001).
6.3 EVALUATION
I have chosen several summative evaluation methods that will enable me to evaluate the
learning of my students in the very same way they will be evaluated for their appraisal in real
jobs problem-solving!
6.3.1 Quizzes/assignment
Through quizzes and assignments, gathered from various sources that apply the standard
theories and tools of Mechanics, I actually tried to put the learners in a situation whereby they
will find themselves in a position where real designers find them on a regular basis. I have
devised an equal number of assignments and quizzes throughout the semester; however,
judging their progress, I might find ways to increase one or the other until I reach the total
number of 6 (6 x 2.5 = 15%). Sometimes it is a good idea to have more quizzes instead of
assignments as the former keeps the students close to their books, lecture notes and flipped
contents, especially when dealing with 3rd-semester students who are nave to the course and
reluctant to studying hard by nature.
Mechanics of materials unfolds a number of new concepts to the learners, which are hard if not
practiced vigorously and easy to make mistakes if not careful enough while analyzing/solving.
Hence, the assignments, they are good for practicing and familiarizing to the common mistakes
and sources of errors that can occur. On the other hand, quizzes are better than assignments
when it comes to individual assessment and assurance that the learners have learned to solve
problems on their own, as they will do it in the class alone.
6.3.2 Lab-works
Labs are great ways to evaluate learners learning experiences. It is the place where industry
events and/or situations are simulated and the students are exposed to them. Therefore, it
presents a great opportunity for the instructor to assess how the students have retained the
theories and how they find themselves comfortable in utilizing their knowledge into real
situations. It is a hands-on experience where even the mistakes are sources of knowledge and
helpful for reiterating understanding of complex engineering theories. From the lab reports that
the students produce after performing the experiments, the instructor can find out exactly how
much the students have conceptualized the problems at hand. They have to explain their
findings whether they are adhering to the theoretical values or not, their ability to explain the
deviations (if any) or agreement between experiment and theory clearly shows their
understanding of what to expect or not from the current set up.
So, I have incorporated a number of labs for my students throughout the semester.
6.3.3 Exams (Mid-Term/Final)
The semester is packed with numerous lessons/modules. The students get to learn about these
concepts for the first time in their academic career. Therefore, careful selection of topics and
spreading them across the entire length of the semester is critical to the sustainable learning
experience. I tried my best to distribute the assessments as dispersedly as possible keeping
them relevant to their most recent learning outcomes. Hence, many things remains untested
which I have to test in some way that is why the mid-term and final exams are necessary as
evaluation tools. Most things that appear here are similar to what the students have already
dealt with in the quizzes and/or assignments, but the concepts or modules that they are based
on are cumulative and sometimes additional to their learning.
I hope that this explains my rationale for the development of my course outcome/objectives. As
for the revisions which I have done to my outline, at times, it was due to the fact that I had too
many or too few outcomes as to accommodate for the expected hours (7 10 hrs to be specific)
of instruction. Other than that, I had to revisit some of the assessment tools, as they appeared to
be qualitative rather than quantitative. I also had to spend a lot of time to adjust the distribution
of the evaluation tools across the semester. I am grateful to my colleagues, as they have pointed
me towards few verbs, which they could not find in the Blooms repertoire! Thus, I had to revisit
the verbs and/or change to something more familiar so that they are easy to understand or
connect to.
At the end, it was a great experience developing such a great resource for my future career. I am
thankful to the facilitators who guided me towards the end to accomplish this.
7 REFERENCES
Bloom, B. S., Mesia, B. B., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New
York .
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom, ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No.1. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
Duch, B., Groh, S., & Allen, D. (2001). The Power of Problem Based Learning. Washington: Stylus
Publishers.
Maurer, H., & Neuhold, C. (2012). Problems Everywhere? Strengths and Challenges of a ProblemBased. Higher Education Academy Social Science Conference: Ways of Knowing, Ways of
Learning, (pp. 1-2). Liverpool.