Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
WILLIAM C. BOND,
Plaintiff,
v.
Background
In his
November 24, 2015, finding that plaintiff did not have standing
to bring the suit, the court could not exercise subject-matter
Id.
In support of his
Id. at 526.
(Doc. No.
17 at Exhs. 27).
Furthermore, plaintiff filed a supplement to his motion to
alter or amend.
Id. at 7, 123.
Standard of Review
Supp. 2d 669, 686 (D. Md. 2012) (quoting Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am.
Natl Fire Ins., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1998)) (internal
quotation marks omitted).
However, a Rule 59(e) motion is not the proper mechanism to
re-litigate those matters already decided.
11 Wright et al.,
Federal Practice & Procedure, 2801.1 (3d ed.); see also In re.
Reese, 91 F.3d 37, 39 (7th Cir. 1996) (Posner, C.J.) (A motion
under Rule 59(e) is not authorized to enable a party to complete
presenting his case after the court has ruled against him.)
(internal citations and quotation marks omitted).
The grant of a
used sparingly.
Id.
to correct a
However, in an effort
The
Harrison v. Westinghouse
Savannah River Co., 176 F.3d 776, 788 (4th Cir. 1999).
Under the
Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 379 (4th Cir. 2008) (citation and internal
quotation marks omitted).
plaintiffs FCA claim did not detail any claim made for payment,
an omission that required dismissal.
Nothing in plaintiffs
The court
Appointment of Counsel
While plaintiff
argues that the nature of his case and defendants themselves are
exceptional, the court disagrees.
The recusal of the sitting judges does not render this case
exceptional, nor does the subject matter.
not name any of the defendant judges, each judge in this district
could be considered a defendant to this action.
It would be
However, a
See 31 U.S.C.
Accordingly,
4.
must be filed in camera and must remain under seal for sixty
days.
stated above, this status does not release plaintiff from his
obligation to follow statutory dictates or the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
B.
Disqualification of the
United States Attorneys Office
did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted and, as
a result, dismissed his complaint.
10
It was and
(Doc. No.
Accordingly,
Conclusion
David A. Faber
Senior United States District Judge
12