420 u.s. 70 Australia 35 u.k. 30 European Union 14 New Zealand 14 Spain. Federal common law of nuisance displaces federal common law for injunctive relief for GHG emissions. Petition to Commission on human rights of the Philippines Requesting investigation of the Responsibility of the carbon majors.
420 u.s. 70 Australia 35 u.k. 30 European Union 14 New Zealand 14 Spain. Federal common law of nuisance displaces federal common law for injunctive relief for GHG emissions. Petition to Commission on human rights of the Philippines Requesting investigation of the Responsibility of the carbon majors.
420 u.s. 70 Australia 35 u.k. 30 European Union 14 New Zealand 14 Spain. Federal common law of nuisance displaces federal common law for injunctive relief for GHG emissions. Petition to Commission on human rights of the Philippines Requesting investigation of the Responsibility of the carbon majors.
Addressing Climate Change Michael B. Gerrard Andrew Sabin Professor of Professional Practice Director, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law March 2016
Resolved Climate Change Cases
Through 2013 420 United States 70 Australia 35 United Kingdom 30 European Union 14 New Zealand 14 Spain
Civil Liability for Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Federal common law of nuisance
American Electric Power v. Connecticut (2011): Clean Air Act
displaces federal common law of nuisance for injunctive relief for GHG emissions Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil (9th Cir. 2012), Comer v. Murphy Oil (5th Cir. 2013): Claims for money damages also displaced (Note: BP a defendant in both.)
State common law of nuisance
Possibility explicitly left open in American Electric Power AEP plaintiffs did not pursue; no other claims brought yet Clean Air Act preemption issue unresolved
Public trust doctrine cases
Dismissals based on lack of standing; public trust doctrine does not apply to atmosphere; separation of powers
Urgenda Foundation v. Kingdom of the
Netherlands (Hague District Court, June 24, 2015)
Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan (Lahore
High Court, Sept. 4 and Sept. 14, 2015)
Petition to Commission on Human Rights of the
Philippines Requesting for Investigation of the Responsibility of the Carbon Majors for Human Rights Violations or Threats of Violations Resulting from the Impacts of Climate Change Filed September 22, 2015 in Quezon City by Greenpeace Southeast Asia and Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement, stating: The Carbon Majors should be held accountable for violations or threats of violations of Filipinos rights (a) to life; (b) to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; (c) to food; (d) to water; (e) to sanitation; (f) to adequate housing; and (g) to self-determination resulting from the adverse impacts of climate change. Seeks investigation, and recommendation that the President call upon other States, especially where the investor-owned Carbon Majors are incorporated, to take steps to prevent, remedy or eliminate human rights violations resulting from the impacts of climate change