Você está na página 1de 3
CHARGE SHEET TRE OF ACCUSED Taal FLT pase SHANA 7 ORIO Es = ont DONT OR ORCRENTEN SCURRENT SERVE SINTAL DATE | Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group — en eee Pre-Trial Confinement se: | I CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS 70 OHARGET VIOLATION OF THE UG ARTICLE B2 Specification 1 (Violation of a Lawful General Order): In that US, »_ Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or near on or about EEE fail to obey a lawful general order, to wit: SECNAV M-5510.36, ph 9-3, dated June 2006, as incorporated into SECNAVINST 5510.36A, dated 6 October 2006, by material classified as SECRET. lly transport Speciation 2 2 (Violation of a Lawful General Order): 10 ht i ». Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, di, at or near on oF about fail to obey a lawful general order, to wit: SECNAV M-5510.36, paragraph 12-2, dated June 2006, as incorporated into SECNAVINST $510.36A, dated 6 October 2006, by wrongly failing to report the compromise of information classified as SECRET. Specification 3 3 (Failure to Obey « Lawiul Order): 1 U.S. ay, eta Maal al oe rece iin is dal, Desig imenigwf when odorants Spotl Seeurty Ocean ecign coracis the Specit Security Office, an onder WRIST Uwas is GUY To Obey did abr nea oa avers oom, between on or about EE and abou fail to obey the same by wrongfully failin; report foreign contacts, SEE 2 ADDITIONAL PAGES Ti PREFERRAL. z : Sa NAME OF ACCUSER (asl Ft Wi GRADE = ORGANVATION OF ACCUSER —— = © OATE fF ‘AFFIDAVIT: Belore me, he UnGars iio aairinster Oaths Ih Gasee of Tis character, personally appeared the above named accuser this _ |, and signed the foregoing charges and specifications under oath that he/sha is @ person eubject to the Uniform Code of Miltary Justice end that helshe either has pereonal knowledge of or has investigates the matters set forth therein and that the same are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belie. fo ee Cd Typed Name of Ofer of ofcer > > — fsa Copsey fo Aaaniter Oaths (See RGM 07It)-mst be commissioned ace) DD FORM 458 SIN OTODLF-OODASED Continuation of DD FORM 458 ICO US. " ———s USN, CHARGE I, VIOLATION OF THE UCMJ, ARTICLE 92 (CONTINUED) Specification 4 (Violation of a Lawful General Order): In that US.Nav Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or near ‘on or about! HEE fait t0 obey a lawful general order, to wit: SECNAV M-5510.36, paragraph 10-3, dated June 2006, as incorporated ito SECNAVINST 5510.36A, dated 6 October 2006, by wrongfillly failing to properly store material classified as SECRET. CHARGE HI, VIOLATION OF THE UCM, ARTICLE 106a Specification I (Espionage): In that U.S. Navy, Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or near on divers occasions, from about to about MMMM vith intent or reason to believe t would Be used tothe advantage ofa foreign nation, communicate SECRET information relating to the national defense to representatives of a foreign government. n 2 (Espionage): In that] U.S. Navy, Commander Patrol and Group, on active duty dd, at Or near Pon civers occasions, from abo with intent or reason to believe it would be used to the advantage of a foreign nation, commut SECRET information relating to the national defense to a representative of a foreign government. Specification 3 (Attempted Espionage): In that U.S.Navy, Commander Patrol ‘and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or nea, on or about] , with intent or reason to believe it would be used to the advantage of a foreign nation, attempt to communicate SECRET information relating to the national defense to a representative of a foreign government. Specification 4 (Attempted Espionage): In (ht ii J.S.Navy. Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or ncar{ on or about| reason to believe it would be used to the advantage of a foreign nation, attempt to communicate SECRET information relating to the national defense to a representative of a foreign government. Specification 5 (Attempted Espionage): In ied Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or near on or about with intent or reason to believe it would be used to the advantage of a foreign nation, tempt to communicate SECRET information relating to the national defense to a representative of a foreign government. CHARGE II, VIOLATION OF THE UCMI, ARTICLE 107 Specification 1 (False Official Statement): In that US.Nayy, Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at nor near on or > AA is intent to deceive, electronically sign an official record, to wit: Standard Form 86, which record was false in that i failed to include foreign travel from] to MMIII ond wes then known by the said A to be so false Specification 2 (False Official Statement): In a US.Navy, Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at nor near on oF about with intent to deceive, electronically sign an official record, to wit: an e-Leave Request a was false in that it listed the leave address as rather than the actual foreign destination, and was then known by the said to be so false. Specification 3 (False Offical Statement): In that US.Navy, Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on aetive duty, did, at nor near on —— swith intent to deceive, electronically sign an official record, to wit: an e-Leave Request dated Which record was false in that it listed the leave address as rather than the actual foreign destination, and was then known by the seid to be so false 3 Continuation of DD FORM 458 ICO US. v._ a USN CHARGE IV, VIOLATION OF THE UCMJ, ARTICLE 134 Specification 1 (Communicating Defense Information): In that US. Navy, Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or near ‘on or about] having lawful access to information relating to the national defense of the United States, which information the said ULS. Navy, had reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, knowingly and willfully communicate information relative to the national defense to a person not entitled to receive said information in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 793(d), an offense not capital | Specification 2 (Communicating Defense Information); In that iS, .S. Nav Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on etive ty, 6, a or near TT on or having lawful access to information relating to the national defense of the United States, which information the said ULS. Navy, had reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, knowingly and willfully communicate information relative to the national defense to a person not entitled to receive said information in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 793(a), an offense not capital. | Specification 4 (Communicating Defense Information): In that| US.Nav Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or near| ‘on or abour| having lawful access to information relating to the national defense of the United States, which information the said ULS. Navy, had reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, knowingly and willfully communicate information relative to the national defense to a person not entitled to receive said information in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 793(@, an offense not capital | Specification 5 (Communicating Defense Information): In that| US.Navy, Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or neat ‘on or about having lawful access to information relating to the national defense of the United States, which information the said ULS. Navy, had reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United ‘States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, knowingly and willfully communicate information relative to the national defense to a person not entitled to receive said information in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 793(d), an offense not capital Specification 6 (Prostitution - Patronizing): In that] U.S. Navy, Commander ‘Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty, did, at or near] ‘on divers occasions from about BRE: <0 MD sronatuly procure to engage in an acts of sexual interoourse for hire and line in the armed forces and of a reward with the accused, such conduct being to the prejudice of good order and nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces. Specification 7 (Adultery): In thet US. Navy, Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, on active duty. amparried man, did. at on near on divers occasions between about| wrongfully have sexual intercourse with ‘woman not his wife, such conduct being to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces and of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces. AND NO OTHERS 4

Você também pode gostar