ADI Investigation Report Peer Review Guide Grade 6

Reviewers Names________________________________________________Authors
ID_____________

Section 3: The Argument

Reviewer Rating

1. Did the author provide a clear and complete

claim that answers the guiding question?

Partially

2. Did the author use evidence to support his or her

claim? Evidence is the data that supports the claim.

Including a correctly formatted and labeled

graph(or table)
Using correct units(usually should be metric)
4. Did the author provide reasoning? Reasoning
includes data analysis and an explanation of how this
analysis supports the claim.
Reviewers: If your group made any No or Partially
marks in this section, please explain how the author
could improve this part of his or her report.

Partially
N

Yes

N
o

3. Did the author present the evidence in an

appropriate manner?

Yes

Partiall

Ye

y
Partiall

s
Ye

No

y
Partiall
y

s
Yes

Instructor

0
1
2
0
1
2
0
1
2
0
2
0
2

1
1

Author: What revisions did you make in your report? Is

there anything you decided to keep the same even
though the reviewers suggested otherwise? Be sure to
explain why.

Mechanics
Did the author use appropriate grammar, and
writing conventions?

No

Are sentences complete without any run-ons? Is there

appropriate spelling, punctuation, capitalization and
word choice(such as then vs than and there vs their)?

Teachers Notes

Partially

Ye
s

0
2

ADI Investigation Report Peer Review Guide Grade 6

Reviewers Names________________________________________________Authors
ID_____________
Section 1: Introduction and Guiding Question

Reviewer Rating

1. Did the author make the guiding question clear?

2. Did the author make the goal of the investigation
clear?

Reviewers: If your group made any No or Partially marks

in this
Section, please explain how the author could improve
this part of his or her report.

No

Partially

Yes

No

Partially

Yes

interpretation of a data set)?

Reviewers: If your group made any No or Partially marks
in this
Section, please explain how the author could improve
this part of his or her report.

Author: What revisions did you make in your report?

Is there anything you decided to keep the same even
though the reviewers suggested otherwise? Be sure
to explain why?

Section 2: Method
1. Did the author provide a clear description of what
he or she did during the investigation in order to
collect data (the method)?
2. Did the author use the correct term to describe
his/her investigation (e.g., experiment, observations,

Instructor

Reviewer Rating

No

Partially

Yes

No

Partially

Yes

Instructor

0
2

Author: What revisions did you make in your report?

Is there anything you decided to keep the same even
though the reviewers suggested otherwise? Be sure
to explain why?