Ge 1) More Net Blogs
ceva
Blog Signin
Innovative thinking about a global world
Possessive individualism
CB, Macpherson was s poiiesl philosopher who placed a geauinely navel
interpretation on te history of political thought in The Political Theory of Postessive
Individualism: Hobbes to Locke whe th
Canadian philosopher who influenced quite a few young scholars in the 1970s in
North America and Great Britin, Macpherton offered the basis ofa strong critique of
the liberalism that places essentially the whole normative
book appeared in 1962. Macpherson was a
certain kind of Hiveralism
‘weight on the value of the individual and ishher ihertes, and essentially no emphasis
on the social obligations we all have towards each her. A first wave of eritcism of
aro liberlis took this form
‘The repair that was needed [to liberal theory] was one that would bring
back a sense ofthe moral worth ofthe individual, and combine it again
of the moral value of community, which had been prevet in
some measure in the Puritan and Lockean theory. 2)
with a er
[But Macpherson feels the nced to go further
The present study... suggests thatthe difficukes of modera liberal-
‘democratic theory lie deeper than had been thought, thatthe original
seventeenth-century individualism contained the central difficulty, whieh
lay in ts possessive quality. Its possessive quality is found in its
conception ofthe individual as essentially the proprietor of his own
for them. The individual
was seen neither as a moral whole, nor a part of larger socal whole, but
person or capacities, owing nothing Wo soce
as an ovmer of himself. The relation of ownership, having become for
more and more men the critically important relation determining their
ct full potential
actual freedom and actual prospect of reaizin
was read back into the nature of the individual. the individual, it was
though, is
inasmuch ashe is proprictr of his person and capacities,
The human essence is fieedom from dependence on the wills of others,
and freedom isa funetion of possession. Society becomes a lt of fee
‘equa individuals related to each other as proprietors of theit ovm
‘capacities and of what they have acquited by thie exercise, Society
consists of exchange between proprietors, (3)
The individualism that Macpherson identifies is of specifi sort iis possessive”
individualism, What does Maepherson mean by this? Here we have the heat of the
theory of possessive individualism: the individual as solely an owner of himself. Her
is his formulation late in the book:
|. What makes @ man hums is freedom from dependence on the wils of others.
2, Freedom from dependence on others means feedom fiom aay relations with
others except those clations which the individual enters volustaely with a view
to his own interest.
Search Ts ot
‘Search
mt
CONCURSO
PREFEITURA DE
SAO PAULO
~
Nivel Médio
EA Zr
TVIDEOAULAS INEDITAS
IL APOSTILAS EM PDF
1 QUESTOES ONLINE
—i—
12xR$6,°7
me 2°°°2
Caran race3. The individual i essentially the proprietor of his own person and capacities, for
which he owes nothing w society
Although the individual eannot alienate the whole o this propery in his own
person, he may alienate his capacity to labout.
5, Human society consists of a series of market relations.
o
Since freedom from the wills of others is what makes a men human, each
individual’ freedom can rightfully be limited only by such obligations and rules
as are necessary to secure the same freedoms for others
Political society ie human contrivance for the protection of the individuals
property in hs person and goods, and (therefore) for the maintenance of erderly
relations of exchange between individuals regarded as proprctors of
themselves. (263-4)
‘The core of the book is a set of interpretive chapters on Hobbes, Locke, the Levellers,
and Harrington. These chapter are careful, detailed, and closely textual and
contextual. The book puts forward a futy simple theory: the British tadition of
political philosophy expresses a rather particular ideology thats pre-philosophical
The ideology (possessive individualism) i avery specific conception ofthe individual
and histhr roles inthe social world. The philosophical theories that are built on that
ideology give shape to that set of assumptions but they are ill suited to recognizing or
critiquing those assumptions. Macpherson highlights the interpretive challenge of