Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
By: John Richards, Eric Guymon, Sean Guymon, Gerald "Jerry" Carson, and Brad Jencks
May 03, 2016
Data
This data was obtained from StatCrunch. There are many datasets there, but we
thought this one seemed linearly correlated and in turn would fit the assignment requirements.
We were also genuinely interested in our above stated hypothesis. Below is the dataset.
Shoe Print Size
Height
31.3
180.3
29.7
175.3
31.3
184.8
31.8
177.8
31.4
182.3
31.9
185.4
31.8
180.3
31
175.3
29.7
177.8
31.4
185.4
31.4
190.5
31.6
195
31.8
175.3
32.4
180.3
27.6
172.7
31.8
182.9
31.3
189.2
31.3
185.4
34.5
193.7
Shoe
Print Size
Height
n
19
X-Bar
31.32
Min
27.6
Q1
31.3
Med
31.4
Q3
31.8
Max
34.5
19
182.62
172.7
177.8
182.3
185.4
195
Predicted y
Residual y
31.3
180.3
182.550
2.249
29.7
175.3
177.998
2.697
31.3
184.8
182.550
-2.251
31.8
177.8
183.972
6.172
31.4
182.3
182.834
0.534
31.9
185.4
184.257
-1.144
31.8
180.3
183.972
3.672
31.0
175.3
181.696
6.396
29.7
177.8
177.998
0.197
31.4
185.4
182.834
-2.566
31.4
190.5
182.834
-7.666
31.6
195.0
183.403
-11.597
31.8
175.3
183.972
8.672
32.4
180.3
185.679
5.379
27.6
172.7
172.023
-0.677
31.8
182.9
183.972
1.072
31.3
189.2
182.550
-6.650
31.3
185.4
182.550
-2.851
34.5
193.7
191.654
-2.046
For the chart below, we know that if we calculate shoe print vs. residual y, we
SHOULDN'T see any linear relationship. If we did, then our data isn't linear (I know it sounds
backwards from what it is).
Initially I didn't think that there was any correlation between shoe print size and height
for men. The data didn't look like they were related. But knowing that the r correlation
coefficient fits the requirements as well as the requirements we just met, there is definitely a
linear correlation evident.
Making Predictions
After realizing there was a direct correlation between shoe size and height we predict
that there is a direct correlation between height and shoe size. We predict that as a person's
height increases so does their shoe print size. So as our X-value increase so will our Y-value. See
example (i). Smaller shoe size would mean a shorter person according to the correlation.
(i) y= 2.845(25) + 93.501
We predict that if someone's shoe print size is 25 their height will be about 164.626.
Afterthought
Our data was collected from a voluntary response. The people provided height and shoe
print size. Our data is collected from a representation of 19 randomly selected people. This
sample would be better if we were to increase our sample size. Our analysis and conclusion
made sense based off of the collected data. Our hypothesis was correct.