Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
4/27/16
AM
Process Paper
(Holtzman). This clearly shows that the US government broke a law they created, and the people
who administered these interrogation techniques legally should have been prosecuted for their
actions. Not only are these actions against US law, they are also against the Geneva Conventions.
Article 3 prohibits torture, cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment of prisoners of war
(POWS). In addition, article 17 bars physical or mental torture that is inflicted to secure
information or a confession from prisoners. Countries that violate the Geneva Conventions can
be prosecuted for war crimes. (Ahmed). As shown in article seventeen, mental torture is
prohibited, and interrogators have used both mental and physical torture on detainees. The laws
are clearly stated in documents that the US government has helped create and sign. The fact that
the government broke the law is probably the reason the CIA was not truthful about the
techniques that were being used.
The interrogation methods that were used by the CIA were a lot worse and less effective than the
government and the public were being told. The CIA told the government and public that these
techniques were effective, but in reality, only seven out of thirty-nine detainees gave information
(Mitchell). This shows that these techniques were almost not effective at all, yet the CIA
continued to do this to people. This is also shown in the CIA Senate Report, where is says the
CIA gave the false impression the CIA was acquiring unique information from the use of the
techniques. Not only were these techniques ineffective, they were far more brutal than it [the
CIA] represented to policymakers and the American public. (Rogan). This shows that the CIA
didnt think what they were doing was justified, and that is why the were not truthful. If they
were within the law, they would have been honest with the government and the public. The fact
that they were not honest makes it clear that the CIA new they were doing something wrong, and
they need to be held accountable for their actions.
My opponent said that enhanced interrogation techniques are not torture, but according to the
Geneva Conventions it is. Article one states that torture means any act by which severe pain or
suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as
obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession when such pain or suffering
is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or
other person acting in an official capacity. (Geneva Conventions). This clearly shows that what
the US has done to suspected terrorists is torture. Waterboarding, a technique that has been used
many times is incredibly physically and psychologically damaging, especially when it is used
over and over again on the same person. A person who was waterboarded 183 times broke
within thirty seconds, it is obviously torture when when someone has been put through a
drowning simulation 183 times. The US signed the Geneva Conventions, and therefore needs to
be held responsible for inflicting torture upon hundreds of people.
As I said earlier, torture is not a reliable or just course of action for fighting terrorism. It is
clearly stated in the Geneva Conventions that the enhanced interrogation methods used by the
US is torture, and does not work as a useful interrogation method. The enhanced interrogation
techniques that are used by the US are incredibly harmful and brutal for everybody involved, and
the cost is not worth the gain.
Sources:
Ahmed, Amel. Did CIA Interrogation Methods Break the Law? Aljezeera America 9 Dec.
2014. http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/12/9/the-cia-torturereportalegalexplainer.html.
BBC. "CIA Tactics: What Is 'enhanced Interrogation'? - BBC News." BBC News. N.p., 10 Dec.
2014. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-11723189
CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment. Human Rights Web 25 January 1997. http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html.
Costanzo, Mark. Gerrity, Ellen. The Effects and Effectiveness of Using Torture as an
Interrogation Device: Using Research to Inform the Policy Debate. Social Issues and
Policy Review 2009: 32. Web.
https://www.cgu.edu/pdffiles/sbos/costanzo_effects_of_interrogation.pdf
Elizabeth Holtzman, a former congresswoman and a co-author of Cheating Justice: How
Bush and Cheney Attacked the Rule of Law, Plotted to Avoid Prosecution and What We
Can Do about It.
Fair, Eric. 'It Was Torture': An Abu Ghraib Interrogator Acknowledges 'Horrible Mistakes'
National Public Radio 4 April 2015.
http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/04/04/472964974/it-was-torture-an-abu-ghraibinterrogator-acknowledges-horrible-mistakes
Mitchell, Andrea. Windrem, Robert. Senate Report Finds CIA Interrogation Tactics Were
Ineffective. NBC News 9 Dec. 2014. http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/cia-torturereport/senate-report-finds-cia-interrogation-tactics-were-ineffective-n264621.
Rogan, Tom. Its Report on Enhanced-Interrogation Techniques Amounts to Intelligence
Birtherism. National Review 9 December 2014.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/394291/senate-democrats-purge-record-tom-rogan.
Scuiletti, Justin. Report: CIAs Enhanced Interrogation Techniques Brutal and Ineffective.
PBS Newshour 9 Dec. 2014. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/enhancedinterrogation-techniques-ineffective/.