38/ 2013.

38

- , , ,
, , ,
, ,
, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glazgov
, Barcelona Strategic Urban Systems, Barselona
, ,
-, ,
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
, ,
, ,




, ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
- , , ,
, , ,
, , , , Glasgow Caledonian University,
Glazgov, , , , , , , ,
, , , - University College Dublin, School
of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dablin, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , , , ,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , , , ,
, , -
, , , , , ,
, , ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
, , ,
, ,

y, 6, , : ,
:

, :

, -
,
11000 , 73/II
: 011/ 3370-091, 3370-109, 3370-203,
e-mail: mp@iaus.ac.rs, milenam@iaus.ac.rs

38
, 2013.
. ,

3-8

...................................................................................................................................................


.................................................................

: 2013, : 2013.

9-16

...........

: 2013, : 2013.

17-32

() ..................................................................................................................

: 2013, : 2013.

33-40

........................................... , ,

: 2013, : 2013.

41-47

............................................................................ ,

: 2013, : 2013.

48-57

-......................................................................................

: 2013, : 2013.

59-65

:
...................................................... ,

: 2013, : 2013.

65-77

.............................................................................................................

: 2013, : 2013.

78-83

()
......................................................................................... . , ,

: 2013, : 2013.

85-88

89-91

92-93

?
............................................................................................

Urban Incubator featuring ........................................................T

: ..........................................................................

III

, xv


20.
, .
,
.
(
)
.
,
.

.


, ,
.


: , ,
.
.

-
.

.

,
, .


, ,
.

, :
, ,
, .
, ,

.

.
,
.


.


,
.

Demographic changes in Serbia in the early 21st century are

the continuation of negative trends from the last decade of the
20th century fueled by political and socioeconomic processes.
They are characterized by a marked depopulation, weakening
of demographic potentials and ageing. Non-uniform population
spatial distribution (depopulation of rural and underdeveloped
areas) and age structure have a significant influence on
imbalanced development in Serbia. On the other hand, this has
led to uncontrolled urbanization and expansion of cities. Authors
of papers published in this issue of the Journal deal with causes
and consequences of these phenomena and possible solutions.
Different aspects of sustainable spatial and urban planning and
sustainable construction are topics which preoccupy the authors,
who regularly publish their research results in this Journal.
Integrated planning which links four development sectors:
economy, society, the environment and institutional
development, is certainly one of the main principles of
sustainable development. Linking professionals with local self/
government within urban regeneration is important. Results of
papers in this field depend to a large extent on organizational
and communication capacities of local community. The idea
about an efficient urban planning is achieved by creating models
for measuring capacities of local communities for integrated
urban regeneration.

Editorial
Sustainable construction criteria as a part of methodology
for evaluating the buildings are widely used in both foreign
and domestic practices. This methodology is implemented
through different certification systems and complex assessment
mechanisms which include numerous sustainable criteria,
both environmental and economic and social ones. It is
based on features which contribute to improving sustainable
characteristics of a number of aspects of problem area of
construction, amongst which water and energy savings,
ecological balance in the built environment, quality of
immediate environment, etc.
There is a plethora of research, analyses and discussions about
housing issue and organization of apartments in multifamily
residential buildings. The concept of Belgrade apartment is
designated in scientific literature as a creative and authentic type
of apartment organization in multifamily and collective housing.
However, this concept has not been sufficiently explored and
explained yet. In papers published in this issue, the authors
present their research results with the aim to confirm the thesis
on the existence of authentic concepts of Belgrade apartments in
certain periods of time. In the opinion of authors, the tendency
to the formation of a central space for family gatherings, which is
an important part of Serbian tradition, is the main characteristics
of Belgrade apartment.
Mila Pucar

21.

, , 1735.

UDK BROJEVI: 314.117.15:711.4(497.11) ; 316.334.54:711.4(497.11)

ID BROJ:205518604
, DOI:10.5937/a-u38-5189

RESIDENTIAL PREFERENCES TOWARDS URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREAS

AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
*
: 2013, : 2013.

Abstract

Urban sprawl is, among all, also the result of vol-

untary or induced resettlement of population from
, ,
,
the inner city to urban periphery, or by in-migra
tion to peripheral parts of cities where the origin of ,


, migrants is in other settlements. The focus of this

paper is on the influence that residential prefer
. ences have on suburbanization, with the emphasis , ,

on analysis of the residential choice and certain

population groups tendencies to prioritise liv-
,
,
ing in suburbs or the inner-city living. Theoretical


considerations which are set in this paper initiate

.
with residential preference components and the

hypothesis of change in dominant motives for resi- / (.

dential choice throughout family and individuals urban sprawl),

lifecycle. Then, the demographic data have been
,
. ,
analysed according to the latest Census results in
.

the two pilot-areas of urban and suburban type


in Belgrade. Additional research on residential

,
preferences are founded on preparation of specific
.
questionnaire which would enable application of

,
more powerful statistical techniques, especially

a wider use of measuring scales for the variables :


deriving from the questionnaire, and formulation
.
(,
of a model for prediction of different population

)
groups
residential
preferences
in
urban
and
sub ,
urban settings.
,
Key words: city, suburb, residential preferences,
.

population

(Ebrahimpour
Masoumi, 2012).

40 .
,
-

,

,

.

: , ,
(Harris, 2010, Ebrahimpour-Masoumi, 2012).
,

* , ,
,
e-mail:jasna@iaus.ac.rs

 , 38/2013/ 3-8/ ...

,

,

( ),

(Ewing et al., 2002).

,
-

(Slaev & Nikiforov, 2013, Harris, 2010).
, ,


,
.
,
.
(Krisjane & Berzins, 2012),


,



.

,
(
),

. ,
, .
,
,

, . .
(, , ),

() ,
,
. ,

,

.
,


(Seo, 2002). ,

.

,
(Petric, 2003a).
,
. ,

, , ,
,
.

, ,
, :
(
),

(Talen, 2001).
,


(Petric, 2003b).

, , ,

.
, , ,
.,

(Talen, 2001).

,

, ,
. ,

,
(
, ), ( ,
)
( ,
) (Brower, 1996, Petric and Petric, 2009).
,
,
()
.
, ,
,

 , 38/2013/ 3-8/ ...

(Cviji, 2000:149).

.
11,7 ,
,
2 4
(Hansen,
2013, Bonin et al., 2008).

1.

1.

2. /

()



, ,

3.

4.

(
,
)
, .

, ,
.
,


. ,
,

. ,
. ,
,
(
)
. ,

,

.

1.
()


,


.

. , .
.



.
,

, ,


. ,
,
,
.


,

,
,
.

 , 38/2013/ 3-8/ ...

.


.


, ,
,

(. 1).

.1.

,
, 4,35 km2
48.450 ( 2011).
,
13%. ,
,
289 km2
83.907 , 11%
2002. .
40
.

( 98%),
, 60%.

-
, , ,
.
,
(45,4 )
(40,1),
. ,
19
( 15%,
2011) ( 21%).


( 60 )
30% ,
21%.

(55%),
,

.

-,

( 35% 27%,
),
( )
( 40%).
,
,
,
, , ,

.

.
( 29%)
( 27%),

.
,

 , 38/2013/ 3-8/ ...

(
29,5% ) ,
15%.

-

( 40%
15
6%
). , ,
( 58%),

( 21%).
40% ,

83%.
,

(51%), 35% .
,

.
( ),
23% . ,

7%.

,

,

,
.

()

(Pui, 2005: 385).


,

().
ja
()
(: Petric, 2003).
7 ( ;
/ ;

; ; ;

;
). 1
7 (1= ; 2= ; 3 =
; 4= / ; 5 =
; 6= ; 7 = ).
,
, .

( ).
,
(Cronbach)
.
,
0,7. ,



.

/
.
:
( 5 6 ),
;
;
; ;
;
;


(Adams, 1992).



-,


,
.
()
.

,

.


,

, ,
,


.

 , 38/2013/ 3-8/ ...

,
.

, .
,


, .

.
:
, ,
,
, ,
.




.


,
, , ,


.

.


. ,

(
)
( ) .

, ,

(. . 36035)
,
2011. 2014. .,
TURS, 282834,

ENV.2011.2.1.5-1.

:
1) Adams, R. E. (1992) A tale of Two Cities: Community
Sentiments and Community Evaluation in Indianapolis and
Pittsburgh, Sociological Focus, 25(3), pp. 217 240.
2) Bonin, H., W. Eichhorst, C. Florman, M. Okkels Hansen, L. Skild,
J. Stuhler, K. Tatsiramos, H. Thomasen, K. F. Zimmermann
(2008) Geographic Mobility in the European Union: Optimising
its Economic and Social Benefits, IZA Research Report No.
19, Swedish National Labour Market Board (AMS), NIRAS
Consultants.
3) Brower, S. (1996) Good Neighbourhoods: A Study of In-Town
& Suburban Residential Environments, Westport, Connecticut
London, PRAEGER.
4) Cviji, . (2000) Antropogeografski i etnografski spisi, 3. izd.,
Beograd, SANU.
5) Ebrahimpour-Masoumi, H. (2012) Urban sprawl in Iranian
cities and its differences with the Western sprawl, SPATIUM
International Review, 27, pp. 12 18.
6) Ewing, R., R. Pendall, D. Chen (2002) Measuring sprawl and its
impact, Washington DC, Smart Growth America/USEPA.
7) Hansen, K. A. (2013) Geographical Mobility, Preuzeto sa: https://
cps.ipums.org/cps/resources/cpr/5_ps.pdf [1.10.2013].
8) Harris, R. (2010) Meaningful types in a world of suburbs, in:
Mark Clapson and Ray Hutchison (eds.) Research in urban
sociology. Volume 10: Suburbanization in global society, United
Kingdom North America Japan India Malaysia China,
Emerald, pp. 15 47.
9) Krisjane, Z. and M. Berzins (2012) Post-socialist Urban Trends:
New Patterns and Motivations for Migration in the Suburban
Areas of Rga, Latvia, Urban Studies, 49(2), pp. 289 306.
10) Petric, J., J. Petric (2009) Achieving sustainable urban goals:
analysis of urban and suburban residential preferences/
Logrando objetivos urbanos sostenibiles: Anlisis de
preferencias residenciales urbanas y suburbanas, u: Yves
Schoonjans et al. (eds.) Readings on sustainability and heritage/
Ensayos sobre sustentabilidad y patrimonio, Brussels/Ghent
Belgium: School of Architecture Sint-Lucas & Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil, PROURB, pp. 275 301.
11) Petric, J. (2003a) Residential Preferences Meeting Sustainable
Urban Goals. An Analysis of the Variability of Urban and
Suburban Preferences, PhD Thesis, Department of Architecture
and Building Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
12) Petric, J. (2003b): Urban and Suburban Preferences
Decomposed for a Sustainable Synthesis, PRoBE Conference
Proceedings, Glasgow, Glasgow Caledonian University, pp. 669
680.
13) Pui, Lj. (2005): O prednostima ivota u Novom Sadu:
Miljenje stanovnika Vojvodine, Socioloki pregled, XXXIX, 4,
str. 383 399.
14) Seo, J.-K. (2002) Re-urbanisation in Regenerated Areas of
Manchester and Glasgow: New Residents and the Problems of
Sustainability, Cities, 19 (2), pp. 113 121.
15) Slaev, A. D., I. Nikiforov (2013) Factors of urban sprawl in
Bulgaria, SPATIUM International Review, 29, pp. 22 29.
16) Talen, E. (2001) Traditional Urbanism Meets Residential
Affluence. An Analysis of the Variability of Suburban Preference,
Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (2), pp. 199 216.

UDK BROJEVI: 352.078:711.4-168(497.11)

ID BROJ: 205519372
, DOI: 10.5937/a-u38-4182

CAPACITY ISSUES IN LOCAL COMMUNITIES FOR INTEGRAL URBAN

REGENERATION

*
: 2013, : 2013.

-

.


. ,

,

.

, , ,
.


,
.




. , :
( )

( ).
.


.
: ,
,

Abstract
The subject of the research in wider sense is organizational-communication capacity of local communities in Serbia in the frame
of sustainable development. Along with this, the paper will explore potentialities of Faludis model of multiplanning agencies
as well as Healeys collaborative theory for better efficiency and
effectiveness of planning in the process of urban regeneration.
Specifically the paper will research relation between organizational structure of local communities in Serbia and their potentialities to provide adequate communication towards integral
information for urban regeneration. Research is framed with a
problem of efficiency and effectiveness in creating urban regeneration policies, strategies, designs, and technical solutions. The
problem will be focused to Serbian context; characterized with
inadequate, transitional, system of governance that is moving
from centralistic towards decentralist model. This will be further
explored through level and type of participation in the process of
urban regeneration. The hypothesis of the research explores the
nature of the relation between number and types of communication channels, provided by organizational structure of local
communities that should enable effectiveness and efficiency of
urban regeneration. In other words the hypothesis is: number
and types of communication channels (variable A) influences
the effectiveness and efficiency of urban planning for sustainable urban regeneration (variable B). The aims of the paper are
identification of the regulations between the variables. Expected
result is establishing the model for measuring the capacity of
local communities for integral urban regeneration.
Key words: sustainable urban regeneration, integral urban planning, capacity of local communities

, . e-mail: tmrdjenovic@arh.bg.ac.rs

 , 38/2013/9-16/

10

, ,
, 1,
(
),
.
, ,
,
, , , .
,


,

, .
21
: ,

(UN, 1992). :
, , 3
(economy, equity and environment),
, ,
,
, (Baji-Brkovi, 1999). .
(Reeves)

, ,
( ) (Reeves,
2005).
,
( , 2009).



.

,
.
,
,


(, 2012: 50).
,

,


.

-

.
1 . (Giddens) (Castells) (Giddens, 2003; Castells, 2000)

,

,
, , .
, ,
, , ,
, , , .

.

, ,
, ,
.

.

.

, -
, ,
,
.
,

()
(Stupar i uki,
2009: 3).
.
21 :
(1) ; (2)
, , ,
, ; (3)
,
; (4)


; (5)

,


(. ); (6)

,
,
, ,

 , 38/2013/9-16/

, .
.
(UN, 1992). , :


.
(Peri, 2013: 2).

, ,

,
(Baji-Brkovi, 1992),
.

,
,
,

,
(Habermas)
.
(Habermas, 1984)
,
:

,
. ,
2 .
-


,
( 1, 2013; 1, 2011)
:
3.


,

, .
(Faludi)
,
(Faludi, 1984), a (Healey)
, ,
4 (Healey,

1997).
(Baji-Brkovi, 2009: 49).
,
,
,
,

,
, .
,
, ,

, ,
,
, ,
(Landry) (Landry, 2005). ,
, ,
,
.
,


(Baji-Brkovi, 1992).



.
.
,
,
,
, (Faludi,
,
1984). ,
,
. ,
, .
,
O,

: (1) :
.


; (2) :
, , ; (3) 2 . :
, , , ,
: , ,
;
,
(Tomi, 2003).
.
3 21 : ,
(UN, 1992).
, , ,
4

-
. ,
.

11

 , 38/2013/9-16/

,
.
,
(Healey, 1997).
,


(. 1).

. 1.
, 1

Tab. 1.
Differencies between creating strategies in positivisticcomprehensive and collaborative approach, uthor 1
according to Healey

, ,

, ,

, (shared place)

12

. 1.

,
.

,

(Faludi, 1984).


()

(Healey, 1997).
,

,

. ,

,
,
. (. 1):

 , 38/2013/9-16/

.1.




. ( 1,
Faludi 1984. . 6.1, .
119)
Fig. 1.
Model for formalizing divergent
thinking using social arenas as
spaces for building up consensus
among conflicts (Author 1 according
to Faludi 1984, fig. 6.1. pp. 119)

.

.

. ,
,
, ,
, , . ,


.
,
( 1):

13

 , 38/2013/9-16/

,
-:

;
,
,
,

1. : )
, )
, )

. 2. : )
, )

, )
. 3. : )
,

, ) (
).

1:
,
Scheme 1:
Relation between variables, criterias and indicators

14

. 1,

,
.

.

. ,


,

.
(2)
,


. ,
,
.
3.
,
.
,

6. ,


.
(

, , ,
).



,
. ,
:
,
,
.
: 1.

, ; 2.


; 3.
; 4.

; 5.

; 6. 7.
, ,
, ,
.


( 1).
6

(, ) (UN,
1992).

 , 38/2014/9-16/

1. : 3., 4.

1.
a)

2. : 3., 4

3. -: 3., 2, 4

4. -: 1. , 3.

5. 1. , 1. , 1. , 2.a,
2., 3., 3, 6

, ,

6. 1.a, 1. ,

,

7. 1.a,

1:


Diagram 1:
Model for measuring capacities of local communities for integral
urban planning in the process of urban regeneration

1.
)


,

, ,

1.
)



1.
)




2.
)

( , , )
2.
)
()
()
()
3.
) ,





,

, ,

3.
) , (
)
( : ,
-, -)
( : ,
-, -)
( :
, -, -)

() . ,

.
(
)

15

 , 38/2014/9-16/

16

,
, ,
.

: , ,
. ,

,

.
,
,
.
: (1)
:
, (2)
: , ,
, (3) :
, ,
,
.

.


.
,

, , ,
,
. ,
,
,

(, , , .).


,
,

,
,
. ,
,
.



. ,
-

,
, ,
,
,

, ,
.
, ,


.

: 36035 , ,

,
, .

:
Baji-Brkovi, . (1999) Odrivost i grad, Beograd, Arhitektonski
fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
Baji-Brkovi, . (1992) Predavanja iz urbanistikog i prostornog
planiranja, Beograd, Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
Castells, M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing
Faludi, A. (1984) Planning Theory, Oxford, Pergamon press
Giddens, A. (2003): Sociologija, Beograd, Ekonomski fakultet u
Beogradu
Habermas, . (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action Volume
One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Boston, Beacon
Press
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Plannig: Shaping Places in Fragmenteted Societies, London, MACMILLAN PRESS LTD.
Landry, C. (2005)The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators,
London, Earthscan
Mrenovi, T. (2011): Integrative Urban Design in Regeneration Principles for Achieving Sustainable Places. Journal of Applied
Engineering Science No. 9(2011)2 , 305-316.
Mrenovi, T. (2013): Urban regeneration: Questioning the subject.
TTEM-Technics Technologies Education Management, Vol 8, No3
Peri, A. (2013) The Review of Planning Practice in Brownfield Regeneration Some European Experiances, Journal of Applied
Engineering Science, 1 8.
Reeves, D. (2005) Planning for Diversity: Policy and Planning in a
World of Difference, New York, Routledge
Stupar, A., & A. uki (2009): Urbani menadment od teorije
do prakse, od vizije do realizacije, Arhitektura i urbanizam, 3-7.
Tomi, Z. (2003) Komunikologija, Beograd, igoja
UN (1992, June 14), Agenda 21, Retrieved 2004, from www.
un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21.
http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/environ.shtml.
Baji-Brkovi, . (2009) Mogu li kreativne ekonomije da proizvode
odriva reenja? Neka evropska iskustva, Arhitektura i urbanizam, 47 60.
Valada RS (2009): Nacionalna strategija odrivog razvoja. Odrivi
razvoj Srbije: Naa zajednika budunost, Beograd, Republika
Srbija, Ministarstvo za nauku i tehnoloki razvoj i Kabinet potpredsednika Vlade za evropske integracije.
Maruna, M. (2012) Regionalne strategije prilagoavanja klimatskim promenama: Smernice za urbanistiko planiranje u Srbiji,
Arhitektura i urbanizam, 50 56.

UDK BROJEVI: 314.117(497.11)2002/2011 ; 911.37:711.4/.7(497.11)

ID BROJ: 205520396
, DOI: 10.5937/a-u38-5334

() 1

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND AGE STRUCTURE OF POPULATION AS THE

LIMITING FACTOR FOR (BALANCED) DEVELOPMENT OF SERBIA
*
: 2013, : 2013.

Abstract

,
, ( )
The population (human resources) is the bearer
,
of economic and social development. The

.
demographic development is shaped by natural
. ,
(
(birth and death) and by migration components

)
(immigration/emigration); when is presented
. ,
(/
by changes in the number and structures of the

),
population, it can be stimulating, slowing down or
()

can be a limitation for economic, social and spatial

, development.


Demographic changes in Serbia in the first decade
. ,
,
of the 21st century are a continuation of the nega .
tive tendencies which began in the last decade of (

the 20th century, substantially fuelled initiated by , ,
, ,
21.
political and socioeconomic processes. In the last
)
decade, the changes were more intensive and de
mographic development was marked by extremly ,
.
20. ,
depopulation, weakening of demographic poten

tial and aging population. This has resulted in an

-
increase disparity in the territorial distribution of
/ ,
.
the population (drastically discharge of rural and

,
undeveloped areas).

The aim of this research is to analyze the demo- ,
,
, graphic changes in Serbia in the last intercensal

period, spatial distribution and age structure of the

. population as a factor of development / constraints
.
of balanced development.


Keywords: population, age structure, settlements,

(
migrations, depopulation.



).
.



,
,
.
,
, ,
.

: , ,

, ,
, .
1

47014
, , ,
, 2011. 2014. .
* , , , 73/II, vesna@iaus.ac.rs

17

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

aje 20. oeo 21. ea, ,

,
,
.

( ,
),
( )
, ,


. ,

, .

/
21. ,
,
.

,
:
,

,

. ,

, .

18

, ,

. ,

, ,
.
,

(, ...)
,
,
.

,
50-
70% ,
. ,

.

,
(Petovar, Vujoevi, 1997).

,

(
, ,
.). , ,

1979. , ,
,
.

( ),


.
()
(

).
,
. ,

(
),

,
, .
,

(Veselinov, 1987, Petovar, Vujoevi, 1996).
,
,
, e,

,
.
, ,
, .
1953. 1991.
,
,
,
. 1961
1971.
600.000 (
). ,
,
( ) je
(19611971). 60-
300.000 ,
1981.
.

,
( 19811990.
36.434)
(Radovanovi, 1995).
,
,

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

. ,
,

.

(
,

,
.).
20.
: ,
, ,
(Mani, Azdejkovi, 2012: 117). E
,
, ,
,
,
90- 20. (Joki,
Petovar, Vujoevi, 1996).

2002. 2 ( 1).
2002. 7.498.001 , 78.836
1991. (
1.0).
/

(162.411), 3 85.573
.

( 61.797, 23.973)
, .
( )
164.606
(116.126)
(59.296).


20022011.
,

1,
(20022011) 13.

( NUTS/Nomenclature des
units territoriales statistiques)4.

2011. ,
,
21.

20.. 2002.
311.787 ( 4.2),
2011. 7.186.862 .

( 3,6 ),
2002.
.
16.867, ,
294.272.

() 2011. .
60.000 .

(
).

(19912011).
(532.145)
, 2011.
68.903, 458.878.

, ,

( 4,2)
,
, (648 ), .
(116.774
),
(133.644),
,

/ (178.146:116.126).

2
2011. 1,6 (
a ) 2,0 (
). 20022011.
( 83.316),
:
( 189.088),
( 105.184)

2002. . ,
. 2002. / 412.443 , 395.124
17.319 ( ).
( ,
.). 1991. .
3
2002. 400 480 . , 122
(102 20 )
(Penev, Stevanovi, 2002).
4
2009. (Sl. glasnik RS, br. 109/09 i 46/10).
, . : 1 ( :
), 2 () 3 (). 2 : ,
, .
3 ( ) .
2

19

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

1) .
2011.
.

.1.
,
19912002. 20022011.
Tab. 1.
Change of the total population, natural increase and migration
balance in the period of 19912002. and 20022011.

( 101.183).
,
(116.674
) 19912002. (45.917 ).

/ :
( ), ( )
( ),
,

( 2002.
).
3, 20022001.
, 22

25 ,
, .
, ,
,
(
17%,
), ( 4%)
, (

,
2002.
/ ).

( 15%), ( 13%),

:
1961-2010, , , , 2012.

20

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

.

2% ,
6% 10%
.
( 12%),
( 7%).
168 , ,
16 (11 ),

2002. .

( 35%) ( 30%), ,
(2022%), 76
10%20%.

,
,
.
. 20022011.
7.200,
5.200,
5.000, 3.000.

( ),
,
, (Prostorni
plan optine Bor, Prostorni plan podruja posebne namene Borskomajdanpekog rudarskog basena Koncept prostornog plana,
IAUS, 2013).

21

.1.


20022011
Fig. 1
The total average annual population change
rate by municipalities in the period 20022011

. 2.


20022011
Fig. 2
The average annual natural population growth
rate by municipalities in the period 20022011

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

. 3.


20022011
Fig. 3
The average annual migration balance
rate by municipalities in the period
20022011

21. ,
20. ,

,
(
)
( ).
, 4% ,
(2011) (23%) ,
9%, (9,3%
) (32%)
( 1). , 2002.
( 50 st/km2) 51
62 ( 44%,
15,2% ).

( 2)5.
(145 st/km2),
e (68 st/km2).
1991.
142 : 77 st/km2.
(518 st/km2),


.
(163 st/
km2),
,
. ,

1.

( %) 2011.
Graph 1.
Share population of district in total population
of Serbia(in%) Census 2011.

24.0
21.0
18.0
15.0
12.0
9.0
6.0
3.0

0.0

22

,
.

( ),

.

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

. 4.

(st/km2) 2011.
Fig. 4.
The population density by municipality (per km2) 2011.

/
(153st/km2) (489st/km2),
(138 st/km2) (510 st/km2)
(124 st/km2) (220 st/km2).
1991.
( 484 518st/km2
135 153st/km2), (
143 137st/km2, 128 124st/km2).

(77:60 st/km2)
.
(47st/km2),
70 91st/km2.

. , 2011.

( 33 st/km2)6, (36 st/km2),
(41st/km2) (48st/km2)7.

( 600 . . .), .
7
45 st/km2
,
2011. .

1000

. 2011. ,
4.709 , 966 ( ) 100
.
629 (32%
) (115, . 30%
), (128, . 60% )
(143, . 54% ).
330 (16% ),
12 .
, 211 20 (150
61
), 313 20 50
(215 , 94
).
100 300
(1.176),
(45,6%) 300 .

: (85%
16% ), (83% 22%
), (68% 13% )
(59% 10% ),
.

(66% 9% )

23

 2. ( 2011)

, 38/2013/ 17-32/

Tab. 2 Basic indicators of population (2011)

4709

7.186.862

624

157

467

37
94
77
50
45
55
109

1)

(km2)

100 km2

km2

1.526

77.468

6,1

92,8

3.591.249

5.755

24.792

2,5

144,9

1.659.440

10.570

3.204

4,9

517,9

1.931.809

4.137

21.588

2,2

89,5

188.087
293.730
615.371
147.770
186.906
187.667
312.278

5.083
3.125
7.992
2.955
4.153
3.412
2.865

2.420
4.282
4.023
2.335
1.784
3.257
3.487

1,5
2,2
1,9
2,1
2,5
1,7
3,1

77,7
68,6
153,0
63,3
104,8
57,6
89,6

4.085

3.595.613

880

52.676

7,8

68,3

2.112

2.031.697

962

26.484

8,0

76,7

439
218
228
206
191
296
359
175

286.549
174.513
298.931
212.603
214.536
241.999
309.258
293.308

653
801
1.311
1.032
1.123
818
861
1.676

6.147
2.467
3.275
3.036
2.616
2.660
3.914
2.369

7,1
8,8
7,0
6,8
7,3
11,1
9,2
7,4

46,6
70,7
91,3
70,0
82,0
91,0
79,0
123,8

1973

1.563.916

793

26.192

7,5

59,7

90
189
173
336
282
214
59
363
267

124.992
183.625
119.967
216.304
376.319
92.479
199.395
159.081
91.754

1.389
972
693
644
1.334
432
3.380
438
344

3.505
3.855
3.599
2.769
2.723
2.762
1.223
3.526
2.230

2,6
4,9
4,8
12,1
10,4
7,7
4,8
10,3
12,0

35,7
47,6
33,3
78,1
138,2
33,5
163,0
45,1
41,1

1)

.
.

1)

.2.

2011.
.

( 2011)
2011. .
Tab. 2
Basic indicators of population (2011)

24

(62% 12%). 60,

(21 . 22% 1,3%
) (12, . 24%
1,4% ).
1.000
,
,
, ,
,
, ( 100 )
. , /,
,
, ,
.

, .



2002. (LSMS, 2002).

,
.
( )

3,
2 ( ) 2 (
).

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/
35.0

16.0

30.0

14.0

25.0

12.0

20.0

10.0

15.0

8.0
6.0

10.0

4.0

5.0

2.0

0.0

0.0

100

101-300

100

101-300

300-500

500-1000

300-500

500-1000

2.

2011.
Graph 2b.
Share of inhabitants in settlement a certain size in the total
population of the region Census 2011

2.

2011.
Graph 2a.
Share of settlement a certain size in the total number of settlements
in the region Census 2011

100

.
.

101-300
300-500

.
..
.

500-1000

.
.

4709

7186862

966

46739

1176

224450

722

282763

843

598249

624

3591249

12

824

53

10748

43

17644

115

84988

157

1659440

1205

17

6901

43

30222

54766

467

1931809

12

824

47

9543

26

10743

72

37

188087

831

94

293730

281

15

3278

2783

16

12040

77

615371

100

662

7696

50

147770

94

11

1998

1153

5222

45

186906

83

1088

2659

3505

55

187667

63

511

822

4148

109

312278

203

10

2006

2495

28

22155

4085

3595613

954

45915

1123

213702

679

265119

728

513261

2112

2031697

330

17500

623

120191

425

167375

448

3156172

439

286549

113

5579

159

31177

76

29078

63

42852

218

174513

403

65

12227

76

30091

54

35982

228

298931

255

45

8951

47

18483

72

52709

206

212603

24

1707

70

13563

43

17159

41

29883

191

214536

13

625

43

8494

37

14585

59

42736

296

241999

38

2069

86

16790

67

26541

68

46848

359

309258

123

6249

113

20571

36

14084

39

27912

175

293308

10

613

42

8418

43

17354

52

36695

1973

1563916

629

28530

500

93511

254

97744

280

197644

90

124992

199

15

3150

20

7863

36

25870

189

183625

240

41

8717

46

17817

61

42435

173

119967

51

2529

66

12795

26

10029

16

10663

336

216304

115

5657

85

15719

46

17859

55

37377

282

376319

39

2227

91

17859

53

20575

52

36829

214

92479

128

4898

54

9694

14

4858

5602

59

199395

422

1611

16

12793

1)

363

159081

140

6687

67

11185

22

8717

20

14405

267

91754

143

5978

79

13970

23

8415

16

11670

1) .

2011. .

. 3.
1000
2011.
Tab. 3.
The number of settlements and population according to the size of
settlement with 1000 inhabitans Census 2011

25

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

()

43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33

42,2
,
(44,6), (43,5), (42,5), (42,1).
.
(43,3),
(42,7),
(41,8).
, ,
,
(
), ( 3).
,
( ),
,

.
: 019 15%
( 1.672.421 1.427.272) 2039 5% (
1.979.451 1.910.323), 4064
28% ( 2.025.875 2.2917.163 )
65 ( 1.240.505 1.250.316 ).

20. ,
(
90-
)
.
12% ( 551.139 510.200),
22% ( 882.091 722.712).


.

-27

4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6

26

3.

2011.
Graph 3
Natural increase and the average
age for the country in 2011.
: 2012.,

,
, 2013

( ) :
1) , 2)
3) .
(
, ,
, ,
a ).
, ,
/ /
. ,
(
)
, . ,

. ,

.
,
/

.
,
, 4.271.872
(59,4%), 2.914.990 (40,6%) .
,
4.336.873 (60,3%),
1.254.381 (17,5%), a 1.595.638 (22,2%)
.
4.





2011.
Graph 4
The major age population
groups share by the level
of functional units and by
the type of settlement
Census 2011.

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/
. 4.

2011.
Tab. 4
The population according to age groups, regions
and districts Census 2011.

0-19

20-39

40-64

65

0-19

20-39

40-64

65 *

7186862 1427272 1910323 2598951 1250316

19.9

26.6

36.2

17.4

4336843

869119 1225802 1566776

675146

20.0

28.3

36.1

15.6

1.3
1.0

1254381
1595638

258417
299736

324714
359807

459339
572836

211911
363259

20.6
18.8

25.9
22.5

36.6
35.9

16.9
22.8

1.2
1.7

3591249

704560

1001463

1296926

588300

19.6

27.9

36.1

16.4

1.2

2502662

482801

721171

893726

404964

19.3

28.8

35.7

16.2

1.2

690029

142675

182259

254556

110539

20.7

26.4

36.9

16.0

1.0

398558

79084

98033

148644

72797

19.8

24.6

37.3

18.3

1.3

1659440
1344844
220130
94466
1931809
1157818
469899
304092
188087
100712
59343
28032
293730
168286
60633
64811
615371
433723
144883
36765
147770
93201
34936
19633
186906
125144
37454
24308
187667
98536
51546
37585
312278
138216
81104
92958

317258
252062
46505
18691
387302
230739
96170
60393
35244
19280
10848
5116
59237
33064
13103
13070
127795
88748
31382
7665
29120
17995
7080
4045
36975
24999
7037
4939
37390
19458
10357
7575
61541
27195
16363
17983

480188
394649
62351
23188
521275
326522
119908
74845
47401
26267
14396
6738
77493
46341
15142
16010
179193
131053
38767
9373
37442
24427
8299
4716
49980
34560
9229
6191
47638
26116
12606
8916
82128
37758
21469
22901

590232
476100
79391
34741
706694
417626
175165
113903
70972
37544
22830
10598
108556
62473
22070
24013
216223
149621
53034
13568
55004
34697
13026
7281
67978
44927
14275
8776
70520
36837
19574
14109
117441
51527
30356
35558

271762
222033
31883
17846
316538
182931
78656
54951
34470
17621
11269
5580
48444
26408
10318
11718
92160
64301
21700
6159
26204
16082
6531
3591
31973
20658
6913
4402
32119
16125
9009
6985
51168
21736
12916
16516

19.1
18.7
21.1
19.8
20.0
19.9
20.5
19.9
18.7
19.1
18.3
18.3
20.2
19.6
21.6
20.2
20.8
20.5
21.7
20.8
19.7
19.3
20.3
20.6
19.8
20.0
18.8
20.3
19.9
19.7
20.1
20.2
19.7
19.7
20.2
19.3

28.9
29.3
28.3
24.5
27.0
28.2
25.5
24.6
25.2
26.1
24.3
24.0
26.4
27.5
25.0
24.7
29.1
30.2
26.8
25.5
25.3
26.2
23.8
24.0
26.7
27.6
24.6
25.5
25.4
26.5
24.5
23.7
26.3
27.3
26.5
24.6

35.6
35.4
36.1
36.8
36.6
36.1
37.3
37.5
37.7
37.3
38.5
37.8
37.0
37.1
36.4
37.1
35.1
34.5
36.6
36.9
37.2
37.2
37.3
37.1
36.4
35.9
38.1
36.1
37.6
37.4
38.0
37.5
37.6
37.3
37.4
38.3

16.4
16.5
14.5
18.9
16.4
15.8
16.7
18.1
18.3
17.5
19.0
19.9
16.5
15.7
17.0
18.1
15.0
14.8
15.0
16.8
17.7
17.3
18.7
18.3
17.1
16.5
18.5
18.1
17.1
16.4
17.5
18.6
16.4
15.7
15.9
17.8

1.2
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.3

3595613

722712

908860

1302025

662016

20.1

25.3

36.2

18.4

1.3

1834181

386318

504631

673050

270182

21.1

27.5

36.7

14.7

1.0

564352

115742

142455

204783

101372

20.5

25.2

36.3

18.0

1.2

1197080

220652

261774

424192

290462

18.4

21.9

35.4

24.3

1.7

2031697
997590
309255
724852
286549
150065
44854
91630
174513
76262
29878
68373
298931
103379
69061
126491

415805
211697
65934
138174
58263
32048
9501
16714
33168
14725
6022
12421
60456
20758
14351
25347

518975
275524
80197
163254
71547
40781
11540
19226
43189
21102
7609
14478
76304
28128
18272
29904

737907
366040
112538
259329
106394
56847
16703
32844
65033
29131
11227
24675
112018
39257
25908
46853

359010
144329
50586
164095
50345
20389
7110
22846
33123
11304
5020
16799
50153
15236
10530
24387

20.5
21.2
21.3
19.1
20.3
21.4
21.2
18.2
19.0
19.3
20.2
18.2
20.2
20.1
20.8
20.0

25.5
27.6
25.9
22.5
25.0
27.2
25.7
21.0
24.7
27.7
25.5
21.2
25.5
27.2
26.5
23.6

36.3
36.7
36.4
35.8
37.1
37.9
37.2
35.8
37.3
38.2
37.6
36.1
37.5
38.0
37.5
37.0

17.7
14.5
16.4
22.6
17.6
13.6
15.9
24.9
19.0
14.8
16.8
24.6
16.8
14.7
15.2
19.3

1.2
1.0
1.1
1.6
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.8
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.7
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.3

27

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

212603
114404
17626
80573
214536
98874
39015
76647
241999
91727
27477
122795
309258
164543
46492
98223
293308
198336
34852
60120
1563916
836591
255097
472228
124992
70880
17603
36509
183625
77109
22707
83809
119967
69035
16659
34273
216304
97213
30535
88556
376319
218105
94859
63355
92479
57807
15376
19296
199395
103864
27402
68129
159081
93316
17089
48676
91754
49262
12867
29625

0-19

20-39

40-64

40474
23067
3401
14006
41120
20152
7811
13157
46194
18339
5618
22237
79257
43409
12416
23432
56873
39199
6814
10860
306907
174621
49808
82478
22616
14410
2864
5342
35733
16398
4285
15050
19631
12798
2612
4221
44780
21327
6500
16953
72043
42927
18495
10621
15921
11295
2636
1990
41672
21982
6017
13673
35461
21926
3783
9752
19050
11558
2616
4876

53549
31787
4477
17285
51701
26017
9441
16243
59717
24705
7206
27806
85206
47192
13048
24966
77762
55812
8604
13346
389885
229107
62258
98520
29023
18782
3612
6629
43493
20696
4882
17915
26602
17776
3524
5302
54652
26757
7633
20262
98895
61773
24310
12812
21578
15185
3618
2775
51773
28419
7063
16291
42095
26331
4588
11176
21774
13388
3028
5358

78527
42653
6657
29217
77353
36190
14092
27071
89249
34262
10174
44813
100585
53635
14926
32024
108748
74065
12851
21832
564118
307010
92245
164863
47459
27883
6551
13025
65334
27919
8029
29386
44741
26635
6179
11927
76872
35322
10896
30654
133818
77960
34166
21692
34217
21945
5911
6361
72900
38232
9926
24742
56569
33556
6106
16907
32208
17558
4481
10169

65

40053
16897
3091
20065
44362
16515
7671
20176
46839
14421
4479
27939
44210
20307
6102
17801
49925
29260
6583
14082
303006
125853
50786
126367
25894
9805
4576
11513
39065
12096
5511
21458
28993
11826
4344
12823
40000
13807
5506
20687
71563
35445
17888
18230
20763
9382
3211
8170
33050
15231
4396
13423
24956
11503
2612
10841
18722
6758
2742
9222

0-19
19.0
20.2
19.3
17.4
19.2
20.4
20.0
17.2
19.1
20.0
20.4
18.1
25.6
26.4
26.7
23.9
19.4
19.8
19.6
18.1
19.6
20.9
19.5
17.5
18.1
20.3
16.3
14.6
19.5
21.3
18.9
18.0
16.4
18.5
15.7
12.3
20.7
21.9
21.3
19.1
19.1
19.7
19.5
16.8
17.2
19.5
17.1
10.3
20.9
21.2
22.0
20.1
22.3
23.5
22.1
20.0
20.8
23.5
20.3
16.5

20-39
25.2
27.8
25.4
21.5
24.1
26.3
24.2
21.2
24.7
26.9
26.2
22.6
27.6
28.7
28.1
25.4
26.5
28.1
24.7
22.2
24.9
27.4
24.4
20.9
23.2
26.5
20.5
18.2
23.7
26.8
21.5
21.4
22.2
25.7
21.2
15.5
25.3
27.5
25.0
22.9
26.3
28.3
25.6
20.2
23.3
26.3
23.5
14.4
26.0
27.4
25.8
23.9
26.5
28.2
26.8
23.0
23.7
27.2
23.5
18.1

40-64
36.9
37.3
37.8
36.3
36.1
36.6
36.1
35.3
36.9
37.4
37.0
36.5
32.5
32.6
32.1
32.6
37.1
37.3
36.9
36.3
36.1
36.7
36.2
34.9
38.0
39.3
37.2
35.7
35.6
36.2
35.4
35.1
37.3
38.6
37.1
34.8
35.5
36.3
35.7
34.6
35.6
35.7
36.0
34.2
37.0
38.0
38.4
33.0
36.6
36.8
36.2
36.3
35.6
36.0
35.7
34.7
35.1
35.6
34.8
34.3

65 *

18.8
14.8
17.5
24.9
20.7
16.7
19.7
26.3
19.4
15.7
16.3
22.8
14.3
12.3
13.1
18.1
17.0
14.8
18.9
23.4
19.4
15.0
19.9
26.8
20.7
13.8
26.0
31.5
21.3
15.7
24.3
25.6
24.2
17.1
26.1
37.4
18.5
14.2
18.0
23.4
19.0
16.3
18.9
28.8
22.5
16.2
20.9
42.3
16.6
14.7
16.0
19.7
15.7
12.3
15.3
22.3
20.4
13.7
21.3
31.1

1.4
1.1
1.3
1.8
1.4
1.2
1.4
2.0
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.3
1.1
1.4
1.7
1.4
1.1
1.4
2.0
1.6
1.1
2.2
2.8
1.5
1.1
1.7
1.8
2.0
1.4
1.8
3.9
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.4
2.2
1.8
1.2
1.7
5.0
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.4
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.4
1.3
0.9
1.4
2.4

; ; ()
* 60 19 .
28

4, 4.
, 2011. ,
( 19 ) ,

(20,0% 20,6%),
(18,8%).
(2039 ) 26,6%

(28,3%) (25,9%)
(22,5%),
(4064 e) 36,2%
. 65
17,4%,

(15,6%:16,9%:22,8%).

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

/
,
,
,
.
(26,5%) 65
, 19
17,5%.
,
.
(42,5%) 65 ,
(10,2%) 19 ,
37,4% 65 ,
19 12,3%.
30%
.
, ,
.
,
, ,
,
.
100 100 300 ( 5 6)

,
.
519 ( 83%) 100
65
30%, 17 ( 20 )

,
,

,
, .
, 2011. ,
(24,3%) 65 ( /
14,7%, 18,0%).



.
(
1,4, 2,0 65
26,3%), ,
1,4
1,8 1,7 ( 25%).
, , ,
0,8 (
25,6%, 14,3%), /
0,7 0,8 (
1,3:1,0).

, ,
. ,
. 5.
100

Tab.
5. 5. 100
Tab. 5. Settlements up to 100 inhabitants
Settlements up to 100 inhabitants

65

100

100%

75%

5075%

14

(20-39 )

3050%

2030%

20

91

4709

966

18

86

233

377

135

117

330

624

12

157

2-5

610

11

277

142

134

2-5

6-10

11

280

153

320

148

190

467

12

4085

954

18

86

233

375

129

113

328

91

273

140

122

280

152

316

142

64

2112

330

16

45

114

72

82

63

23

98

57

89

57

34

134

86

19

1973

624

17

70

188

261

57

31

265

68

175

83

33

223

118

182

56

45

. 6.
100 300
Tab.
6. 6. 100 300

Tab. 6. Settlements
of 100
to 300
inhabitants
Settlements
of 100
to 300
inhabitants

101- 300

65

14

5075%

3050%

2030%

20

2-5

(20-39
)

6 -10

11

5%

5-10%

1020%

20%

4709

1176

81

424

433

235

11

15

68

129

953

39

159

637

337

624

53

17

27

46

36

17

157

467

47

4085

1123

2112

1973

2
5

15

27

81

419

416

208

623

12

187

259

165

500

69

232

157

43

34

13

40

15

64

128

907

39

159

599

322

15

61

542

44

332

241

12

49

67

365

34

115

267

81

29

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

, (31)

20%. , 265

,

68 , 175 .
60- 20. . ,
(2039 ) 223

(35%), 118
,
. ,

.
,
100 300 ,
.
. 30%

65 301

( 60%), 14 7 ,
.
(26%)

, ,
(51,3%:48,7%),
30%

10%.
.
.
,
30% 65 ,
(52%:48%),
20%.
(50,6% : 46,4%),
,
/ .
12% (79 ) .
,
,
( 7).
10% 49 (8%
(65,9%)
), 20%
7. 2039


2011 , 4,3%
(241), ,
a
7. The distribution
groups Census 2011
Tab.

. of women by type of settlement and age.

16,7%,
(17,0%).

30

20-39

40-64

65

61,4

61,0

65,7

62,4

54,6

17,0

18,1

16,5

17,1

16,7

()

21,5

21,0

17,8

20,6

28,6

70,7

68,6

73,4

70,6

69,3

18,6

20,2

17,4

18,7

18,5

()

10,7

11,2

9,1

10,7

12,3

81,9

79,5

83,1

81,8

82,7

12,7

14,6

12,4

12,7

11,0

5,4

5,9

4,5

5,4

6,3

60,8

59,6

64,1

60,7

58,0

23,8

24,8

22,3

24,0

24,7

()

15,3

15,6

13,6

15,3

17,3

51,9

53,5

57,0

53,9

41,0

15,4

16,0

15,4

15,3

15,1

()

32,6

30,5

27,6

30,8

43,8

50,2

51,0

54,6

51,9

40,5

15,0

15,7

15,2

14,9

14,0

()

34,9

33,3

30,1

33,1

45,6

54,3

57,0

60,1

56,5

41,7

16,0

16,3

15,6

15,8

16,5

()

29,7

26,7

24,2

27,7

41,8

()

0-19

.7.


2011.
Tab. 7.
The distribution of women
by type of settlement and
age groups Census 2011.

17,4%, 4%
.
5,1%
, 5% ,
5,8% , 5,5% .
,
2030 .
71,9% , 8,6%
(63,3%), 8,5% ,

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

11,5%
2039 , 46,5%,
(57,8%), 10,4%
53,5%, ,
(28,6%).
.


(

8).
.
,

8. 2011.
.
,
Tab. 8. The
share
of women
in
the total population
by age group
Census 2011.

and
/

0-19

20-39

40-64

65

52,2

48,6

50,3

53,0

58,5

50,1

48,5

47,6

49,5

57,1

()

49,7

48,5

46,5

47,8

57,0

52,7

48,7

50,7

53,4

59,6

50,3

48,5

47,6

49,8

58,3

()

49,9

48,7

46,4

48,7

58,7

53,2

48,7

51,5

54,3

59,2

50,2

48,4

48,6

50,7

54,8

()

50,0

48,8

47,3

49,3

56,1

52,1

48,6

49,7

52,5

60,1

50,4

48,6

47,1

49,4

59,7

()

49,9

48,7

46,1

48,4

59,6

51,6

48,5

49,8

52,5

56,9

49,8

48,4

47,7

49,1

55,9

()

49,7

48,4

46,5

47,6

56,5

51,8

48,6

50,0

53,0

57,0

49,9

48,2

47,9

49,6

56,1

()

49,6

48,7

46,6

47,7

56,4

51,3

48,4

49,6

52,0

56,9

49,7

48,6

47,4

48,4

55,8

()

49,8

48,0

46,5

47,4

56,7

/

(, , ).
21.
.

, ,

(
).

,
. ,
2011.
(World Economic Forum),
,
,
(Peji-Soki, Grei 2012).

. 8.

2011.
Tab. 8.
The share of women in the total population and
by age group Census 2011

,

.

,

.

, ,
, , , -
,
, , . ,

,
,

- .

31

 , 38/2013/ 17-32/

32

, (Budunost
sela Srbije, 2012: 64).
o.
, IPA

.
,

.
2010-2020
20112015.

.
.


(, ,
, , ).
( 2008. )

.
,

. ,
2009.
(Sl. glasnik RS, br. 59/09). ,

,

(Raevi, 2009: 61).
,
(
2012. ).
je

,

. ,
, 2012.
(68%
, 83.000 ),
, (56,8%).

,
,
, aa,
,

.
,
.

:
Budunost sela Srbije 2012, Tim za socijalno ukljuivanje i
smanjenje siromatva, kabinet potpredsednice Vlade za
evropske integracije, Vlada Republike Srbije, Beograd, str. 1
156.
Veselinov, V. (1987) Sumrak seljatva, Beograd, Ekonomika
Izvetaj o razvoju Srbije 2012, Ministarstvo za regionalni razvoj i
lokalnu samoupravu, sektor za strateke analize i istraivanja,
Beograd 2013.
Joki V., K. Petovar , M. Vujoevi (1999) Demografski procesi u
Srbiji devedesetih sa osvrtom na Kolubarski lignitski Basen,
u: Korienje resursa, odrivi razvoj i ureenje prostora 4, Beograd, Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije, str. 169 183.
Mani, S., D. Azdejkovi (2012) Potencijalni efekti demografske
tranzicije na odrivu konkurentnost, Ekonomski horizonti,
majavgust 2012, godite XIV, sv. 2, Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, str.111120. http://www.horizonti.
ekfak.kg.ac.rs/sites/default/files/casopis/2012_2/SR/Manic_
Azdejkovic.pdf
Petovar, K., M. Vujoevi (1996) Razmetaj i kretanje stanovnitva
kao faktor odrivog (regionalnog) razvoja Srbije, u: Korienje
resursa, odrivi razvoj i ureenje prostora, Posebna izdanja
br. 30, Beograd, Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije, str.
169182.
Petovar, K., M. Vujoevi, (1998) Uticaj nekih demografskih faktora na ostvarivanje koncepta odrivog razvoja u seoskim
podrujima Kosova i Metohije, u: Korienje resursa, odrivi
razvoj i ureenje prostora, posebna izdanja, br. 35, Beograd,
Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije, str. 243264.
Penev, G., R. Stevanovi (2002) Smanjenje ili poveanje
stanovnitva? Prvi rezultati Popisa 2002. u Centralnoj Srbiji,
Stanovnitvo br. 1 4, Beograd
Peji-Soki, P., V. Grei (2012) Socijalni uticaji emigarcija i
migracija selo grad u Centralnoj i Istonoj Evropi, VT/2010/00,
saetak, Evropska Komisija GD za zapoljavanje, socijalne
poslove i inkluziju ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=88
25&langId=sr
Prirodno kretanje stanovnitva u Republici Srbiji 19612010,
podaci po optinama (2012), Beograd, Rebuliki zavod za
statistiku Srbije
Program implementacije Prostornog plana RS 2010-2020
za period 20112015, Republika agencija za prostorno
planiranje (2011)
Prostorni plan optine Bor, Nacrt plana (2013), Beograd, Institut
za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije
Prostorni plan podruja posebne namene Borsko-majdanpekog
rudarskog basena Koncept plana(2013), Beograd, Institut za
arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije
Popis stanovnitva, domainstava i stanova u 2002. godini, Uporedni pregled broja stanovnika 1948, 1953, 1961, 1971, 1981,
1991. i 2002. godine po naseljima, knjiga 9, (2004), Beograd,
RZS
Popis stanovnitva, domainstava i stanova u 2011 godini, Starost
i pol po naseljima, knjiga 2 (2012), Beograd, RZS
Radovanovi, S. (1995) Stanovnitvo gradova i sela u Srbiji posle
Drugog svetskog rata, Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU,
knj. XLIV, Beograd, str. 5560.
Raevi, M. (2009): Populaciona politika u Srbiji: stanje i
oekivanja, Stanovnitvo br. 2, Beograd, str. 5365.
Strategiju za upravljanje migracijama, Slubeni glasnik RS, br.
59/09.
Strategija za podsticanje raanja, http://www.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/
dokumenti_sekcija.php?id=45678

UDK BROJEVI: 502.131.1:69 ; 712.4:692.4

ID BROJ: 205521676
, DOI: 10.5937/a-u38-5054

Evaluation of green roof characteristics in green building

assessment

*, **, ***
: 2013, : 2013.

Abstract
1
Methodology
of
building
evaluation
based
on
green




building characteristics is rapidly gaining momentum,


mainly in foreign, but also in domestic building practice.
,
,
This methodology is being carried out through different
.

Green Building Certification Systems, which are complex

, evaluation mechanisms based on numerous criteria of
, sustainability, addressing both ecological issues, but

also economic and social ones. Green roof represents one

(Cole, 2003).
of the must have features of contemporary buildings
, ,
aiming to gain green label. This paradigm is based on (Jovanovi .
their numerous characteristics which contribute to Popovi et al, 2008),


different aspects of building sustainability, among which

are savings in energy and water consumption, but also ,

ecological balance and quality of built environment. ,

Criteria used for evaluation of green roof solutions and
.
their overall contribution to the building, are integral
,
part of all of the mentioned certification systems, but ,
,
the way they are structured and formulated inside each

system varies significantly, hence causing differences in ,

evaluation results. This paper presents the analysis of
,
green roof related criteria of three characteristic green (Jovanovi-Popovi et al., 2009).
,

building certification systems: LEED, BREEAM and

,
CASBEE. These systems are chosen primarily because
,

of the different evaluation methodology, but also
.
,
because of their market prevalence and perspectives

of usage in the domestic practice. Conclusions driven .

from these analyses and comparisons provide insight
,
into main aspect of green roof planning and construction
,

which are relevant for the overall building sustainability
,
,
assessment.
,

Key words: green roof, Green Building Certification
.

Systems, LEED, BREEAM, CASBEE






: LEED,
(Cole, 2003).
BREEAM CASBEE.
,
* , ...., - ,

, sekulic.mirjana55@gmail.com
.
** , ... - ,
, stankovicarch@gmail.com

***.
, ...,

, milicajp@arh.bg.ac.rs
.
1
, Green Building Certification Systems, Building
: , a e
Environmental Assessment Methods,
, LEED, BREEAM, CASBEE
(Ignjatovi et al, 2011), , ,
,

.

33

, , . , . . , 38/2013/ 33-40/

(Crnevi i Sekuli, 2012).
.

,
,
.

, , , (
)
(Sekuli, 2013).

,
.

34

,


(Ding, 2008). ,

(best
practices),
(Larsson, 2000).
,

.
(Cole, 2003):
- ,
,
- ,
-
.

, ,
, .
, BREEAM (Building Research
Establishment Environmental Assessment Method)
1990. . .

.
(U.S. Green
Building Council, USGBC) LEED (Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design).
, LEED
(Papadopoulos, Giama, 2007; Wu,
Low, 2010).
, BREEAM,

LEED .
LEED 1998. . (Version 1.0),

.
,
,
, .
LEED

(credit forms) ,
, /
. LEED
(
1.000 2003. . 10.000 2008.
.) ,
,
(, ) (
LEED ). ,
LEED
(, , ,
).
,


.


,
(Wen, Y. C., 2005).
,
, ,

. LEED ( LEED for
New Construction and Major Renovation, LEED-NC)
:
(sustainable site
development, SS);
(water savings, WE);
(energy and atmosphere, EA);
(materials and resources, MR);
(indoor environmental
quality, IEQ);
(innovation in design, ID).

(prerequisits)
. .
,
, .
- (. 1):
BREEAM 10
LEED :
(Management), (Health & Wellbeing), (Energy),
(Transport), (Water), (Materials),
(Waste), (Land Use
& Ecology), (Pollution), (Inovation).

, , . , . . , 38/2013/ 33-40/

. 1.
LEED-NC
Fig. 1.
Structure and criteria categories of LEED-NC system

,
. LEED


(, , ,
, ),
, BREEAM ,
(,
, , ).
CASBEE
. R

. 2001. .

,

,
.

,
.


(Q, Building Environmental Quality & Performance)
, (L,
Building Environmental Loadings) .
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
(. 2).
BEE (Building Environmental Efficiency)
,
Q L (BEE=
Q/L), ,
, BEE
, .

35

, , . , . . , 38/2013/ 33-40/

. 2.

(
Q)
(
L) CASBEE

Fig. 2.
Illustration of building Environmental Quality
& Performance criteria (Q) and Building
Environmental Loadings criteria (L) according to
CASBEE certification methodology
. 3.
CASBEE

Fig. 3.
Radar chart of CASBEE certification results in
different criteria categories

36

LEED

(. 3)

.
,
3 (Q1, Q2, Q3)
(LR1, LR2, LR3).

LEED :
(SS), (WE)
(). , (Hake,
2007),
(),

, , . , . . , 38/2013/ 33-40/

,
,
,
, , ,

.

,
,
().

:

- (SS 5.1: Site Development:
Protect or Restore Habitat)

,

,

- .
(SS 5.2: Site Development:
maximize open space)
,
,
.
(SS 6.1: Stormwater
Design: Quantity Control)
,
,
.
(SS 6.2: Stormwater
Design: Quality Control)

.
- (SS 7.1: Heat
Island Effect: Non-Roof)
(
)
,
.
- (SS 7.2: Heat Island
Effect: Roof)
,
50% ,
2
.

(WE 1: Water Efficient Landscaping)

50% (2 ),
2

(Innovation in Design), (Exemplary
Performance) ,
.

( 2 )
(
).
( 1: Optimize
Energy Performance)


LEED ( 21
). , ,


.
,
,

,
,

HVAC
,
,
(Khler, 2007).

(SS) ,

6 . 4
(WE), 10%
.
(),

(Ansel,
2004),
(Sekuli, 2013: 269271)
5% 10%
,
3 1 .
10%,

.


LEED (Hake,
2007),


,
, LEED- (
LEED for Green Roofs). ,
LEED
, ,

,
,
.

37

, , . , . . , 38/2013/ 33-40/

,
,
3,
,

.

,
, LEED
Gold , 4
(Wildlife Conservation Society)
(. 4 5).

BREEAM

BREEAM

(Wat 01) CO2,
(Ene 01),

,
.


(Wat 04:Water Efficient

. 4 5.

,
, LEED

Fig. 4 and 5.
Center for Global Conservation,
Bronx Zoo campus, LEED-Gold
certified

38

3-15 cm
. . :
, , , . ,
, (Sekuli, 2013).
4
Center for Global Conservation, FXFOWL, http://www.fxfowle.com/projects/4/Center%20for%20Global%20Conservation/

, , . , . . , 38/2013/ 33-40/

Equipment), ,
( )


.
,
,
(Mat 01:
Insulation) (Wst 02: Recycled Agregates),

BREEAM
5. LEED-NC ,
, , .


(Land Use & Ecology).
(LE 03: Mitigating ecological impact),


6
. , ,
(Suitably Qualified Ecologist, SQE)

.
2 , .

(LE 04:Enchancing site ecology)
(SQE)
,

.
3 ,

6
.
(Pollution),
(Pol 03) ,
5 .
.

CASHBEE

,

(LR3: Off-Site Environment: Consideration of Local
Environment),

, :
,
,
.
,
3
40% .
27
, 20
,

.

,

(JSBC, 2011: 175),
(LR1: Energy: Building Thermal Load).


(Q3: Outdoor Environment on Site),
(Conservation
& Creation of Bitope)
(Improvement of the thermal environment on site)

.
7,
15 ,
13 .
,
,
.

,
3 ,
27 ,
18 .
:
, ,
,
HVAC
.

,
7
,

.

Green Guide
(LCA-Life Cycle Assessment) BREEAM . : http://www.bre.co.uk/greenguide/podpage.
jsp?id=2126
6
broad habitat type BREEAM ,
(taxon richness), .
7
LR3: Off-Site Environment: Load on Local Infrastructure: Reduction of Rainwater Discharge Loads)

39

, , . , . . , 38/2013/ 33-40/

AK

, ,
, ,
.
8,
LEED .
,

,
.
,
. (do less harm)
.
.

(Hake, 2007).
,
.


.

36034

.

40

Ansel, W., & Appl, R. (2004) Future and sustainable green roofs in Germany, In
Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Proceedings of the Second North American Green Roofs Conference, Portland, Toronto, The
Cardinal Group
BREEAM. New Construction Non-Domestic Buildings Technical Manual
SD5073 - 2.0: 2011. Watford, United Kingdom: BRE Global; 2011.
http://www.breeam.org/
Ding, G. (2008) Sustainable construction: The role of environmental assessment tools, Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 86,
Issue 3, p. 451-464.
Ebert, T., N. Eig, G. Hauser, (2011) Green building certification systems,
Institut fr internationale Architektur- Dokumentation GmbH & Co.
KG - A specialist book from Redaktion DETAIL, Munich
Ignjatovi, D., N. ukovi- Ignjatovi, B. Stankovi, (2011) Architectural
design energy efficiency assessment methods for building design and
renovations, Proceedings: Building Services & Architecture 2011 International Conference, October 27-28. 2002, Belgrade, Serbia
Jovanovi-Popovi, M., S. Kosanovi (2009) Selection of building materials based upon ecological characteristics: priorities in function of
environmental protection, Spatium 20, p. 23-27.

Jovanovi-Popovi, M., S. Samardi, S. Kosanovi, B. Markovi, (2008)

Unapreenje energetske efikasnosti gradova / zgrada kroz proces energetske sertifikacije, Meunarodni nauni skup: Odrivi prostorni
razvoj gradova, Beograd, 2526. januar 2008, Tematski zbornik radova: drugi deo, Beograd, Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije,
str. 229240.
JSBC. Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE) for New Construction Assessment Manual: 2010 Edition.
Tokyo, Japan: Japan Sustainable Building Consortium; 2011. http://
www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/
Khler, M., Wiartalla, W., and Feige, R. (2007). Positive interaction between
PV-systems and extensive green roofs. Green Roof Infrastructure Monitor,
9, 1. Pp 14-15.
Larsson, N. (2000) Green Building: An Overview. http://fmv.fcm.ca/files/
Capacity_Building_-_MBRG/GB_policy_may_En.pdf pristupljen
07. 09. 2011.
Papadopoulos, A. M. and Giama, E. (2007) Rating systems for counting buildings environmental performance, In: M. Santamouris and
P. Wouters (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd PALENC conference and 28th
AIVC conference building low energy cooling and advanced ventilation
technologies in the 21st century , PALENC 2007, 2729 September,
CRETE Island, Greece, pp. 754758.
Sekuli, . (2013) Razvoj i transformacije krovnog vrta od nastanka do
danas i njegova savremena primena, Doktorska disertacija, Novi Sad:
FTN Departman za arhitekturu i urbanizam
USGBC. LEED Reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction: For the Design, Constructions and Major Renovations of Commercial and Institutional Buildings Including Core & Shell and K-12
School Projects: 2009 Edition. Washington DC: US Green Building
Council; 2009. http://www.usgbc.org/leed
Hake, A. (2007) Promoting sustainable green roofs through Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Department of Landscape
Architecture, University of Missouri - Columbia
Cole, R. (2003) Building Environmental Assessment Methods: A measure
of Success, Int. Electr. J. Construct, Special Issue on the Future of Sustainable Construction
Crevi, . I Sekuli, . (2012) Zeleni krovoi u kontekstu klimatskih
promena - pregled novih iskustava, A r h i t e k t u r a i u r b n a n i z a m , b r . 3 6 , Beograd
Wu, P., S. P. Low, (2010) Project Management and Green Buildings: Lessons from the Rating Systems, Journal of professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Wen, Y. C. (2005) Comparison of two sustainable building assessment
tools applied to Holmen project in Stockholm, Master of Science Thesis
in Built Environment Analysis, Stockholm, Royal Institute of Technology
:
.1: http://leadingleed.com/tag/energy-and-atmosphere/
. 2: http://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/methodE.htm
.3:. 3: http://pichapuch.wordpress.com/2013/02/09
. 4 5: http://www.fxfowle.com/projects/4/Center%20for%20Global%20Conservation/

http://www.sam.org.rs/sr/actuelles/Novosti+iz+Izvr%C5%A1ne+kance
larije/story/717/BLUE+CENTER+-+PRVA+ZELENA+ZGRADA+U+SRBIJI.

UDK BROJEVI:728(497.11)19
ID BROJ: 205522956
, DOI: 10.5937/a-u38-4770

BELGRADE APARTMENT
*, **
: 2013, : 2013.

b
The term Belgrade apartmentis related to two periods

and two phenomena: a)the concept of apartment in


: ) multiple-family buildings in Belgrade between the two .
world wars (1918-1941) and b)activities of Belgrade , ,
School of architecture, formed during the 60's and 70's

.
of the twentieth century. In order for a certain concept
(1918 1941) )

of apartment organization to be called Belgrade, it had

. -
to have clearly defined characteristics which set it apart
,

from other typology of apartments built in its immedi60- 70- XX . ate surroundings, or it had to be created in Belgrade, XIX XX ,

and then spread further. Until today it has never been

, researched or explained what these characteristics of
. .
Belgrade apartment were, as it has been defined in
scientific literature as a creative and an authentic type of
apartment organization in multiple-family buildings in


collective housing. The research discussed types of char ,
,
acteristic concepts of room organizations in apartments
built during the two periods, from 1918 to 1941 and
(1815) XX
,
1960 to 1975. The aim of the research was to prove the (Nestorovi, 1955). ,
. hypothesis on the existence of the authentic concepts of


Belgrade apartments which were designed in the men tioned periods.

, Key words: architecture, Belgrade apartment, saloon
(
apartment, upper class apartment, apartment between ).
two world wars, Belgrade school, widened communica-

tion, tenement.

.


. , . ,

1918. 1941. . 1960. 1975. .


,
, (Roter-Blagojevi,
.
1998: 2728). . , . -
: , ,

, , ,
,
, ,
, ,

, ,
. (Bajlon, 1975: 2324).
.

60- XX ,
,
A
* , ..., ,
, 60- 70-
djordje.alfirevic@gmail.com
(Bajlon, 1979, 1975, 1972).
** , ...,

, sania.simonovic@gmail.com
60- 70- XX .

41

 , , 38/2013/ 41-47,

,
,

1.

, , . ,
(, ,
),
(Nestorovi, 1955: 252, 263).
. . ,
() ,
,
,
(Manevi, 1979: 211; Martinovi, 1972).

XX ,
(1892. .) (1905. .)
(Nestorovi, 1955: 248).

, .


, ,
(Mini, 1954: 184187). ,

, , ,

(),

(Mecanov, 2010: 81).
. ,
(-),
.

,
(. 1, , ).


( ), XX
, ,

(Vuksanovi Macura, 2011: 66).

(. 2):
a) ,

, ;
) ,

;
) (, , , ,
)

;
)
;
) (
)
,
, ;
) 3 3,6 m,

;
) ,
;
) ,
.
. 1(, , ).


:
)
,
)

)
Fig.1 (, b, v).
Types of saloon apartments in
Belgrade between two world wars:
a)with yard tract next to
neighboring lot,
b)with yard tract along central
staircase and
v)without yard tract.

42

,
. ,
o ,

(, 1955: 248).

 , , 38/2013/ 41-47,

(.
3) (. 3).
,
.
, (. ,
. , . , . , .
.),
(Kekovi, 2008: 75;
Kekovi, Petrovi, 2008, 2011; Kekovi, emeriki, 2007).
, 1918. .
, .
.2.


(1- , 2- (),
3- , 4- , 5- , 6, 7- , 8- ,
9- , 10- , 11- ,
12- ).
Fig.2
Saloon apartment in Belgrade between
two world wars (1-Entrance, 2-Hall (Dining
Room), 3-Saloon, 4-Room, 5-Corridor,
6- Bathroom, 7-Toilet, 8-Kitchen, 9-Maid's
room, 10-Pantry, 11-Loggia, 12- Balcony).

. 3 (, , ).
,
(1- , 2 (), 3- , 4- ,
5- , 6- , 7- ,
8- , 9- , 10- ,
11- , 12- )
Fig.3 (a, b, v)
Saloon apartment in Nis, Novi Sad and
Zagreb between two wars (1- Entrance,
2-Hall (dining room), 3- Saloon, 4-Room,
5- Corridor, 6 Bathroom, 7 Toilet, 8Kitchen, 9- Maids room, 10- Pantry,
11- Loggia, 12-Balcony).

,
, ,
,
. ,

, .
(. 3)

, . (Darko Kahle)
,
XIX . 1923. 1934. .
64.000
,

43

 , , 38/2013/ 41-47,

44

. 4 (, , ).
,
XX

Fig.4 (a, b, v)
Apartments in tenement buildings in Paris,
Budapest and Vienna at the beginning of XX

()
,
(Kahle, 2002: 157,
164; Kahle, 2003).
,
, ,
(
), ,
,
.
,
.


,
(. 4, , )


( ),
, . , ,

, ,

(Nestorovi, 1955: 260).
()

,
.

,2

, .
,

,
.

,
,
(Vasi, 2008; Ili,
2007; Dvornikovi, 1990 .).

,

,
.

, ,

(
, ,
), 60- .
(
),

(Damnjanovi, Gligorijevi, 2010: 46; Furundi,
1964; Dobrivojevi, 2012). 60-

,
(Stojanovi, 1970;
Milainovi-Mari, 2011: 5).

()

.

, , ,
, (Ili, 2007: 319).

 , , 38/2013/ 41-47,

. , 1957. .
,
, ,

1918. 1941. .
(Bajlon, 1979: 2027).
,
,

(Lujak, 2010: 42). 60- XX ,
,
. 3
(Bajlon, 1975: 3436). .

( 60- 70- .)
(Mecanov, 2008: 142;
Mecanov, 2010: 87).
60- 70 XX ,
,

, -
1918. 1941. .

, ,
. ,4

,5 , ,
,

1983. .6
.
,
. , . . ,
,

(anak, 2011: 41; anak, 2002). . ,


7
)
,
;

) ,


(, ),

;
)
,
( ) ,
;
)
,
,
, .
) ,

,
;
) ,

(
,
);
) ,
;
) ,

, ,
,
;
)
,

;
) ,

,
.
60- 70- XX ,
,
(
), ,

. : . , . , . , . . .
, : . , . , . ,
, : . , . , .
, . , . , . , . , . .
5
, , . . , ,
(arui, 1975: 7).
6
1970. 1986. . -
() . : . , . , . , . , . , . , .
, . , . , . , . -, . . (Anonim, 1979; anak, 2011: 1841).
7
. 8. 2010. .,
, 5.
( 2010).
4

45

 , , 38/2013/ 41-47,

(. 5, , ):

1918 1941. .
60- 70- .,
:

. 5 (, , ).

60- 70- XX
Fig.5 (a, b, v).
Characteristic examples of ''Belgrade apartments''
formed during the 60's and 70's of the twentieth
century.

(1918 1941)
1.
;
2. ( )
( );
3. : ;
4.
;
5.
;
6.
;
7.
;
8. ( )
.

(1960 1980)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

;

, ;
;

;
--
;

;

.

.1

60- 70- .
Tab.1
Comparative presentation of basic characteristics of Belgrade apartment
between two world wars in the 60's and 70's.

46

,

.
,

, ,
,
60- 70- XX

. ,
,
, .
( )
,
60- 70- . ,
,
,
( ),
,
.

 , , 38/2013/ 41-47,

Anonim (1979) Saradnici Centra za stanovanje IMS, Informacije

25, 3 36.
Bajlon, M. (1979) Stanovanje, Tema 1: Organizacija stana,
Beograd, Arhitektonski fakultet
Bajlon, M. (1975) Stan u Beogradu, Arhitektura i urbanizam,
74-77, 23 42.
Bajlon, M. (1972) Neka pitanja u vezi sa upotrebnom vrednosti
stana, u: Jari, M. (ur.) Stan i stanovanje (posebno izdanje),
Beograd, Izgradnja, 27 38.
anak, M. (2011) Memento: Centar za stanovanje IMS (1970
1986), Povodom 40-godinjice osnivanja, ARD Review, 38,
18 41.
anak, M. (2002) Standardi minimalnog kvaliteta u stambenoj
izgradnji, ARD Review 27, 37 46.
Damnjanovi, D., . Gligorijevi (2010) Socijalno stanovanje:
Prikaz stambenih politikaSrbije i odabranih zemalja Evrope,
Beograd, Palgo Center
Dobrivojevi, I. (2012) Stambene prilike u jugoslovenskim
gradovima 1945 1955, Istorija 20. veka, 2/30, 115 130.
Dvornikovi, V. (1990) Karakterologija Jugoslovena, Beograd,
Prosveta
Furundi, B. (1964) Graevinska delatnost Beograda u periodu
od 1944. do 1964. godine, Godinjak grada Beograda, 11
12, 99 132.
Ili, A. (2007) Pedagozi u Kraljevini Srbiji o naciji i nacionalnom
vaspitanju, Pedagogija, 2/62, 313 325.
Kahle, D. (2003) Zagrebaka ugraena najamna kua u razdoblju
od 1935. do 1945. godine, Prostor, 11, 1/25, 33 43.
Kahle, D. (2002) Zagrebaka ugraena najamna kua u razdoblju
od 1928. do 1934. godine, Prostor 10, 2/24, 155 167.
Kekovi, ., M. Petrovi (2011) Functional Zones of Flats
in the Period of Art Moderne in Ni (1930 1941), Facta
universitatis, 3/9, 495 499.
Kekovi, ., M. Petrovi (2008): Formative Characteristics of
Moderne Style in Ni, Facta universitatis, 1/6, 51 64.
Kekovi, . (2008) Stambena arhitektura Nia u pokretu
moderna izmeu dva svetska rata (doktorska disertacija),
Univerzitet u Niu, Graevinsko-arhitektonski fakultet
Kekovi, ., Z. emeriki (2007): Most Significant Buildings
of the Moderne Style Multy-Family Housing in Ni, Facta
universitatis, 1/5, 1 15.
Lujak, M. (2010) Spatialization of social process vs singular
object of architecture, Spatium 23, 38 45.
Manevi, Z. (1979) Beogradski arhitektonski modernizam 1929
1931, Godinjak grada Beograda, 26, 209 226.
Martinovi, U. (1972) Moderna Beograda, Beograd, Nauna
knjiga
arui, D. (1975) O nastanku broja (uvodni tekst), Arhitektura
i urbanizam, 74 77, 6 7.
arui, D. (1975) Prikaz konkursnih projekata 1965 1975,
Arhitektura i urbanizam, 74-77, 45 84.
Mecanov, D. (2010) Valorizacija arhitekture stambenih zgrada iz
perioda moderne, Naslee, 11, 79 101.

Mecanov, D. (2008) Tipologija oblika stambene arhitekture

pedesetih godina XX veka u Beogradu, Naslee, 9, 129 153.
Milainovi-Mari, D. (2011) Razvojni tokovi u srpskoj arhitekturi
od 1945. do 1961. godine, Arhitektura i urbanizam, 33, 3 15.
Mini, O. (1954) Razvoj Beograda i njegova arhitektura izmeu dva
rata, Godinjak grada Beograda, 1, 177 188.
Nestorovi, B. (1955) Evolucija beogradskog stana, Godinjak
grada Beograda, 2, 247 270.
Roter-Blagojevi, M. (1998) Oblici vieporodinog stanovanja
krajem XIX i poetkom XX veka u Beogradu, u: Unapreenje
stanovanja 98, Beograd, Arhitektonski fakultet, 21 32.
Stojanovi, B. (1970) Posleratna beogradska arhitektonska
izgradnja, Godinjak grada Beograda, 17, 201 236.
Vasi, N. (2008) Atanasije Uroevi o gostoprimstvu i gostoljublju u
gnjilanskom kraju, Batina, 25, 267 274.
Vuksanovi Macura, Z. (2011) Socijalni stanovi Beograda u prvoj
polovini 20. veka, Naslee, 12, 65 89.

. 1 ()
(Mecanov, 2008: 93)
. 2
( . )
. 3
(Kekovi, 2008: 65)
. 3
( )
. 3
( )
. 4 XX
(Bajlon, 1975: 24)
. 4 XX
(Bajlon, 1975: 23)
. 4 XX
( )
. 5
(: . , . ),
1973. (Marui, 1975: 81)
. 5
(: . ), 1968. (Marui,
1975: 60).
. 5 29 (: .
, . ), 1967. (Marui, 1975: 51).

47

UDK BROJEVI: 725.4(450)18/19 ; 904:6(450)18/19

ID BROJ: 205523468
, DOI:10.5937/a-u38-4627

Valorization of the industrial heritage in Italy on the

example of sugar factories in Emilia-Romagna
*
: 2013, : 2013.

48

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the experiences


that Italy has had in the domain of preservation


and valorisation of the industrial heritage. By
.
.
the means of the historiographical approach, the

development of the concept of this patrimony


will be explained, starting from United Kingdom,
,
, , which was a pioneer, through France to conclude
, with Italy.
.

The concept of the industrial heritage was

.
gradually developed and it was followed with a


foundation of various institutions, which expanded
(Euston)

their activities from a cataloguing of remains of
1962. .,
the industrial past to an active participation in

,
revitalisation projects. Connected to this evolution


is the development of the industrial archaeology
. ,
as a scientific discipline which offered some
,

instruments in the valorisation of the industrial

. patrimony. Some misconceptions and errors about

,
this heritage have been put to light, and the role
,

of the architect in this process has been explained.


The analysed cases were chosen from the region


of Emilia-Romagna because it was the centre of

. the Italian sugar production and, consequently,
XIX .
possesses a big quantity of material remains.

Different experiences and scenarios, elaborated

by private and public sector will be presented, also

.
with some aspects of the heritage valorised with
,
more or less success.

- Key words: industrial heritage, industrial

archaeology, valorisation, sugar, experience
,
,


.
. , ,
,

.
,

, .

: ,
.
, , ,
* , ..,
( 1 -,
, )
valeks86@gmail.com

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

. 1.
Les Halles
Fig. 1.
Destruction of the complex Les Halles

..
,
1971. 1973. .
Les Halles.

(Georges Pompidou)
XIX . Les Halles
(. )
(. 1.)
Gare du Nord ili Gare dEst
. ,
20 m
.
,
,
(Chtlet-Les Halles),
5 3 RER-a1. ,
800.000 ,
,

.
1977. .,

() San Leucio: Archeologia, storia, progetto2,
(Eugenio Battisti)
.
,
.

2
3

RER (Rseau express rgional dIlle de France)

. 5 : A,
B, C, D i E.
(1977): San Leucio: Archeologia, storia, progetto. Milano,
Formichiere

,
.
1976. . Centro di Documentazione e Ricerca
Archeologica Industriale3 Instituto
Centrale del Catalogo4.
,
.
, (Antonello Negri,
Massimo Negri)


(A. Negri, 1983).
.

( ,
- 5),
-
,
,
.

: Associazione Italiana per
il Patrimonio Archeologico Industriale (AIPAI)6.
,
soprintendenza-, , , ,
, ,

.
4
5

Histoire des
techniques, Universit Paris 1 Panthon-Sorbonne
2011/2012
Anne-Franoise Garon ,

Erasmus Mundus TPTI: Tecniques, Patrimoine, Territoires de lIndustrie.

49

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

?
.

1939. .,
,

. ,

D.L. n. 62 2008. .,
,
.
,
.

50

(Celano, Chirico, 2011: 150).
, , .
, ,
,
.



( ) , , ,
, , ,
. , ,
.
, ,


.

,

.
,
,
,
,
, ,
,
.


,
,


.

.
, ,
,
,
. ,


,
.
, ,


. ,

,
,
.


,
.

,
: ,
, .


.
,

.
(Celano, Chirico, 2011:
151),

,
ad hoc
.
,
,
(G. L. Fontana, 2012: 10) :

,
,
.
,
;
, , ,
,
.
,

.

, ,

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

,
,
.
,
, ,
,
.
, .

,
.

, ,
,
. ,

,
.

,
.

.
, ,


,
.
, (Tonizzi,
2001).
, 70- XIX
,
. , 17 ,
1811. 1855. .,
,
: ,

(Severini, 2004).
XIX
. ,
-.
,
:

(, , ),
(Esposti, 2009).
XIX
,
, ,

(. 2).

. 2.

Fig. 2.
Sugar factory in Forli

,

, ,
, ,
(Esposti, 2009, Tonizzi, 2001).
,
(. company towns, . cits ouvrires, . cit degli
operai), .
, ,
,
.
, ,
,
(Robert Owen,
1771-1858), ,
.

.
, ,
-- 1876. .
,
.

.

70- ,

.
,

, ,

.

,
.

51

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

( )


(. 3). PRG-a7

1987. 2005. . , Cassa
di Risparmio di Cesena, ,

,
.
Gregotti Associatti
Internationa8,
, .

,
.
,
,

,
(A. Massarente, 2011:
117).

,
,
90% .
,
, .

,
,

(. 4 i 5).


.
,

.
. 3.

Fig. 3.
Sugar factory in Cesena before intervention;

. 4 i 5.

Fig. 4. and 5.
Destruction of the sugar factory in Cesena

52

7
8

Piano Regulatore Generale- .

, ,
.
.

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

Eridania
,
, (Renzo
Piano). 1898. .,
(San Girolamo)
.
1968. .,
. 1980. .,
(. 6).

,
,

.
,
N. 19 3. 1989. ., Piano
di Riqualificazione Urbana9,

.
:
, , , ,
.

. , 80 m,

.

. ,
, , ,
,
, .


. ,
,

(. 7 8).
. 6.

Fig. 6.
Sugar factory in Parma before intervention

. 7 8.

;""
Fig. 7 and 8.
Main entrance and interior of
the concert hall Paganini

9
.

,
,
,
(F.
Irace, 2002: 44).
, ,
.

.

53

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

, ,
.
.




,

,

.
?

,

.
,
,

( ) .
, (


?). ,
, (A. Vitale, 2012: 101):
, ,
,
, ,

.


.

. 9 10.

Fig. 9. and 10.
Abandoned sugar factory in Classe

54

( )
, ,
(. 9
10), ,
- ,
SantApollinario in Classe,
UNESCO-a (A. Massarente, 2011:
121; I. Zanier,1996: 144147).
1983. . PRG-
,
1993. .
4 .

,
, ,
(. 11 12).

,
, ,
.
,
,
.

-,


.


,
,
(A. Massarente, 2011: 125).

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

. 11 12.
-
Fig. 11 and 12.
Project for the archaelogical museum in Classe-3D model

Eridania
,
(. 13).
1898. .
. 1968. . (R. Roda, F.
Guerzoni, 1992: 7784).
1985. ., ,
,
Fondo Regionale per le Infrastrutture Economiche
e Territoriali10,
.

.
,
,
.
, 1990. .

. , ,
,
,
. ,
,
, (Vittorio Dal Piaz) ,

,
,
- (Del Piaz, 2009).
. 13.

Fig. 13.
Sugar factory in Ferrara before abandonment

, ,
.

- .
servizi11: aula magna12, ,
, .

(Rebecchini,
G., 2006: 6271).

. ,
, ,

.
,
. ,
.
.
,

,

(. 14).
10

.
Servizi .
12
Aula magna ,
.
11

. 14.

Fig. 14.
Sugar factory in Ferrara after the conversion
55

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

56

-,

, .
: ,

; ,


;
,
;
,
,
,
, .

.
,
.
, .
,
.
,
. ,
,
,

(Biancardi, E., 2005: 2735).

,
,
.
(Codigoro),

( ) . ,
,
,

.
Garzaia di
Codigoro.


. ,

, ,

,
, . ,
: , , , ,
.

,
.
;
;
,
(Massarente, A., 2011: 135).


, ,
, ,
.


ERIH13.

, ,
. ,

, -,
.
,
TranStory Travelling through History.
Thematic routes in the Adriatic cultures.

,
,
.

,
.


.
,
,
.


,

( ).


.

,

, ,
,
13

European Routes of Industrial heritage. :

http://www.erih.net/

 , 38/2013/ 48-57, -

. ,
,

.

.

, ,
,
,

.

Biancardi, E. (2005) Le radici della dolceza. La bieticoltura e

lindustria saccarifera nel Veneto del 900, Rovigo, Minelliana,
pp. 1119, 2735.
Bondoni, A., G. Callegari, C. Franco, L. Gibello (2005) Stop &
Go. Il riuso delle aree industriali dismesse in Italia. Trenta casi di
studio, Firenze, Alinea, pp. 155159.
Celano, E., S. Chirico (2011) Industrial archaeology and
Creativity for the Restauration of Abandoned areas, Redige No.
2, pp. 148158
Dal Piaz, V. (2008) Gli spazi per la ricerca e i programmi
di riqualificazione delluniversit, Presentato nel ambito
del Workshop Internazionale: Zuccherifici: conoscenza,
valorizzazione, riuso. Le fabbriche trasformate: i casi studio
degli zuccherifici di Ferrara. Da edificio produttivo a complesso
fieristico e infine a polo per la didattica e la ricerca universitaria: il
caso del complesso dellex-Eridania a Ferrara, Ferrara
Franz, G. (2001) Trasformazione, innovazione, riqualificazione
urbana in Italia, Milano, Franco Angeli
Gelsomino, L., P. Orlandi (2003) Forme e traccie dellabitare,
Bologna, Editrice Compositori, pp. 120122.
Gregotti, V. (1997) Metafore di etternit, Domus No. 795, luglio
agosto
Irace, F. (2002) Spazio acustico e scatole sonore: Renzo Piano
e larchittetura musicale, In. Rossi, A.: Renzo Piano. La fabbrica
della musica. LAuditorium Paganini nella Citt di Parma, Editrice
Abbitare Segesta, Milano, pp. 2628, 36, 44, 46, 65.

Massarente, A. (2011) Gli zuccherifici in Emilia-Romagna.

Riflessioni attomo a modelli, strumenti e tecniche per la
valorizzazione di un patrimonio in corso di trasformazione, In:
Fontana, M. T. e Chirigu, E.: Il patrimonio industriale dellEmiliaRomagna. Atti del convegno di Bologna (2 dicembre 2009),
Bologna, Crace editrice, pp. 113139.
Morpurgo, G. (2004) Gregotti Associatti, Ginevra Milano,
Rizzoli-Skira, 200205.
Negri, A., M. Negri (1978) Archeologia industriale, Firenze,
DAnna
Rebecchini, G. (2006) Frammenti di architettura italiana,
Firenze, Pasigli Editori, pp. 6271.
Roda, R., G. Guerzoni (1992) Il tempo delle ciminiere. Censimento
fotografico del patrimonio storico industriale della provincia di
Ferrara. Parte prima: 1800-1920. Vol.1., Padova, Interbooks, pp.
7784.
Sibra, G. (2009) Gli zuccherifici di Cecina e Sermide. Progetti dolci
in sistemi territoriali complessi, Settimo Milanese, Stampamatic,
pp. 1123.
Vari autori (1977) San Leucio: Archeologia, storia, progetto.
Milano, Formichiere
Vitale, A. (2012) Luci e ombre sulla gestione del patrimonio
industriale dismesso, Techne No. 2, p. 101.
Zannier, I. (1996) Viaggio nellarcheologia industriale della
provincia di Ravenna, Ravenna, Longo Editore, pp. 2021, 64
65, 144151.

57

, , 1737.

UDK BROJEVI: 004.733:711.435 ; 004.738.1:711.435

ID BROJ: 205524492
, DOI: 10.5937/a-u38-4947

City information and communication networks as means

of incrising participation: case study of municipality of
inija, serbia
* **
: 2013, : 2013.

Apstract

City information and communication networks are ,

specific form of local online communities, designed
()

for inhabitants of particular city, its administration,
online
,
, municipality service providers, investors, tourists,

as well as any others interested party. This .

paper studies the potential of such networks
,
, to assist public participation in city planning
and management. It explores the benefits and
.

potential pitfalls of using such technologies.


In addition, the paper will present and analyze

.

the city information and communication network

created and used by the municipality of Inija.

,
In 2002, the municipality made a strategic

,
development plan, in which the improvement of , .,

local administration was among the first priorities. ,
.
The administration started the installation of
(Mihajlov, 2011).
an integrated information system right away

, .
essentially creating e-government platform in
order to enable all citizens to participate in solving
. 2002. .


local problems, as well as to facilitate their day-to ,
day communication with the local administration. ,

, , ,
Keywords: city information and communication
,
, ,
networks, participation, Inija

,

(Lalovi, 2010).

, ,
-.
, ,
,
: ,
, ,
,
.,
.
* , ..., , -,
, ,
e-mail: matija0brkovic@gmail.com
**
, ,
visnja_sretovic@yahoo.com

59

. , . ., 38/2013/ 59-65, :

60

, ,

(Innes & Booher, 2004).

/
.
-,
WWW ,

-. ,
-,
-
(), - :

-
.

,
. (Uprava za Digitalnu
agendu, ).
, . , : (wiki)
, online , ,
. , ,

.

,
.

WWW
,
,
, .
,
(Weidemann) (Femers) (Carver & Peckham, 1999)
,
,
, , ,
(. 1).
, , -,
.
,
.
,
(Baji Brkovi, 2006).

().
20.
, .
,
,
(Devetakovi Radojevi, 1999).
-
, . digital city, municipal information and communication network, city portal . (van den Besselaar, 2005).
(Guthrie & Dutton, 1992)
,
, civic network.

, ,
(1999) .
,
online
,
, ,

,
,
(, , , ...)
WWW

,

( ,
, , ,
, (), 3 ,
, .) (,
, , ), -,
, online (chat) .1,
. , ,
-.

. 1.
(
)
Fig. 1.
Participation levels (based on Weidemann and Femers)

- , : Dutton (2003),
Batista (2003).

. , . ., 38/2013/ 59-65, :

,
sine qua non

(Dutton, 2003).
, ,
, , .
, ,

,

(Lalovi, 2010).
(, ,
, .)
().2


, ,
.
-

(, .),
,
,
.
,

.
,
, .

,

, .,

.

,
, .

.
, online ,
., . .
.

,
,
.
- ,

,
., ,
. .
-
2

(. , 120/2004),
.

, -

.
,
,
.
(Milovanovi, 1999).
(URA) (,
, .), , ,
, , ., 2003. .
(-consultation
portal)
.

,
, ,
.
(Brail &
Klosterman, 2001):

;
;

;

;
;

.

(Baji Brkovi, 2006; Graham, 2002)

,

(. ),
,
-.

online

.
1994. .,
,
, ,
.
(Baji Brkovi,
2006) :
;
( ,
, );

;
;
,
- ,
.

61

. , . ., 38/2013/ 59-65, :

62

2002. .

,

-,

.
www.indjija.net
(. 2).

.
, ,
, , , -.

.
.
,
. ,
: , , ,
,
, ,
, , ,
,
,
, ,
,
(
),
, , ,
, ., 48.
,
,
,
(, , ,
.)
,
(
-,
48 .). ,
, ,
,
, ,
, .,
, , .


. -
(
, , .)
,
.

. 2.

Fig. 2.
Webpage of Inija municipality

( ,
.)
,
(.
),

, -
48.

. , . ., 38/2013/ 59-65, :

48


48 .
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
,
,
, -, ,
.


.

,
.
()

,
, , ,
.
,

.
,
,
. , ,
., .


,
, , .,
,
., ,
.


, ,

.
.
,

.

,
,

(, ,
.), , ,
.
,
, 48 .
. .
-
, ,
,
, .
-
, .
, .
online
.

.

,
. ( )

.
1400
,
,
.
48

.
48
.
CitiStat ,
2004. .,
. 2007. . , 48,

6500 (Microsoft, 2007), 2012.
15000 (Brkovi & Sretovi, 2012). 48

.
63

. 3.


Google-u (Google Insights)
Fig. 3.
Trend of searching the
term Inija on Google
(Google Insights)

. , . ., 38/2013/ 59-65, :

64

-

(Google) (. 3).
,
(Google Insights),
2005. .,
.
, ,
2007. .

(Red Hot Chilli Peppers).
(4.
),
(Google, 2011).
WEB 2007. .

, 2008. FDI, Financial
Times, 25
,

.
,
.

,
,
. ,

(Brkovi & Sretovi, 2013).
, .
,
,
.

, ,
- .,
(Lalovi, 2010)
-, ,
,
,
(Milovanovi
Rodi, 2010).
,
.



.

,
,
,

(Stalna konferencija
gradova i optina, 2006).

.


, ,
, .
-

.
online ,
,

.

, ,
.

,

, ,
,
.
: , ,

,
, ,
, ,
, .
, ,

.
, .


(Steins, 2002):
;


;
;

;
;
.
,
,

.
,
(Baji Brkovi et al., 1999).

.
, ,

, ,
, .

. , . ., 38/2013/ 59-65, :

- .

.

,
.

, ,

(36035), M .

Baji Brkovi, M. (2006) Fenomen digitalnog grada. U: Zbornik

radova: Upravljanje odrivim prostornim razvojem. Posebna
izdanja. Beograd, IAUS
Baji Brkovi, M., D. Milovanovi, M. Devetakovi Radojevi (1999)
Digitalni grad: Nove komunikacione i informatike tehnologije i
razvoj grada. U: M. Baji Brkovi, (ur.): Odrivost i grad. Beograd,
Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, str. 5567.
Batista, C. (2003) ICTs and Good Governance: The Contribution
of Information and Communication Technologies to Local
Governance in Latin America, Brazil, NP3 - Ncleo de Pesquisa e
Polticas Pblicas, Universidade de Brasilia. Dostupno na: http://
bit.ly/1bAsB1n [Avgust 18, 2011]
Brail, R.K., R.E. Klosterman (2001): Planning support systems:
integrating geographic information systems, models, and
visualization tools, Redlands Calif., ESRI Press
Brkovi, M., V. Sretovi (2012) Urban Sensing Smart Solutions for
Monitoring Environmental Quality: Case Studies from Serbia. In:
Congress Proceedings. 48th ISOCARP World Congress. Dostupno
na: http://bit.ly/Z5AarU [Novembar 15, 2013]
Brkovi, M., V. Sretovi (2013) Harnessing Social Media for
Urban Planning: An Overview. In: Congress Proceedings. 49th
ISOCARP World Congress. Dostupno na: http://bit.ly/1cZ1SBk
[Novembar 15, 2013]
Carver, S., R. Peckham (1999) Using GIS on the Internet for
Planning. In: Geertman, S., S. Openshaw, J. Stillwell, (eds.):
Geographical Information and Planning, Advances in Spatial
Science. New York, Springer, pp. 371-390.
Devetakovi Radojevi, M. (1999) Struktura i tretman elektronskih
informacija u gradskim informacionim mreama. U: M. Baji
Brkovi, (ur.): Odrivost i grad. Beograd, Arhitektonski fakultet
Univerziteta u Beogradu, str. 83-95.
Dutton, W.H. (2003) Understanding the Internets Web of
technology and People, Balliol College Record. Dostupno na:
http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk [Septembar 18, 2011];
Google (2011): Web Search Interest: Inija - Worldwide, 2004
present, Google Insights for Search. Dostupno na: http://www.
google.com/insights/search/#q=indjija&cmpt=q [Oktobar 11,
2011];

Graham, S. (2002) Bridging Urban Digital Divides? Urban

Polarisation and Information and Communications Technologies
(ICTs), Urban Studies 39, pp. 33-56.
Guthrie, K.K., W.H. Dutton (1992) The Politics of Citizen Access
Technology: The Development of Public Information Utilities in
Four Cities, Policy Studies Journal 20; pp. 574597.
Innes, J.E., D.E. Booher (2004) Reframing public participation:
strategies for the 21st century, Planning Theory & Practice 5 (4th
ed.), pp. 419-436.
Lalovi, K. (2010) Informacioni sistemi za podrku odluivanju
u odrivom razvoju gradova. U: M. Baji Brkovi, (ur.):
Kreativne strategije za odrivi razvoj gradova u Srbiji. Beograd,
Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, str. 301-341.
Microsoft (2007) Odgovor graaninu za najvie 48 asova:
Studija sluaja primenjenog reenja, Microsoft: Studije sluaja.
Dostupno na: http://bit.ly/1iqTpYB [Septembar 9, 2011]
Mihajlov, V. (2011) Izmeu informacionih mrea i fizike strukture
grada: novi uzroci klimatskih promena, Arhitektura i urbanizam
33, str. 60-65.
Milovanovi, D. (1999) Informacione tehnologije u funkciji
efikasnog razvoja grada primer Singapura. U: M. Baji
Brkovi, (ur.): Odrivost i grad. Beograd, Arhitektonski fakultet
Univerziteta u Beogradu, str. 69-81.
Milovanovi Rodi D. (2010) Izazovi informacionog doba:
e-upravljanje prostornim razvojem Srbije. U: M. Baji Brkovi,
(ur.): Kreativne strategije za odrivi razvoj gradova u Srbiji.
Beograd, Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, str.
277-299.
Stalna konferencija gradova i optina (2006) Neposredno uee
graana u javnom ivotu na lokalnom nivou, Beograd: Stalna
konferencija gradova i optina. Dostupno na: http://bit.
ly/1bAsu65 [Septembar 25, 2011]
Steins, C. (2002): The top 10 technologies for urban planning,
American Planning Association (APA) Planning Magazine
Uprava za Digitalnu agendu, Portal eUprava Republike Srbije eParticipacija. Portal eUprava Republike Srbije. Dostupno na:
http://bit.ly/1h06Xv7 [Septembar 24, 2011]

65

UDK BROJEVI: 728.3.012.8(497.11)

ID BROJ: 205525260
, DOI: doi:10.5937/a-u38-4997

1
*
: 2013, : 2013.

.
,
60- .

, , .
.
, 80- , 90-
,
, ,
. 2000 ,
. ,
(Richard Meier)
20- .
, ,
, .
, ,
,

,
. ,


,
, .

,

.

66

* , . . ., ,
canak.mih@sbb.rs
1

- ,
-, ,
, 20. 11. 2012. .

Abstract
Every generation of architects in their early professional life
intensively and emotionally go through certain tendencies, turning them into. After a relatively short episode with soc-realism,
my generation was in the 60s absolutely directed towards the
international style, relating to its postulates, with or without
deeper understanding, depending on everyones abilities and
knowledge. In the 70s the dominant trend was sculptural late
modern, in the 80s it was post-modern, while in the 90s a
somewhat deconstructive trend came into fashion. However,
it has never established itself more widely, partly due to the
war, partly because of the technical and conceptual inabilities
of those who took part in construction projects. Since 2000 and
on, a wide range of so-called neo-modern has been dominant
in Serbia, initiated several decades ago by the architect Richard
Meier, with an aim of restoring early modern of the 20s, varying
it from reduced minimalism to sophisticated, sometimes even
overly ornamented plasticism, at least in terms of the exterior.
However, as for interior design, one particular tendency has
been present for decades - the inclination to integrated and
maximally open inner spaces in all architectural segments,
particularly in housing architecture. This, essentially logical and
useful inclination has very often hypertrophied, thus becoming counter productive in cases when functions of different use
were forcefully connected. In this text we aim to define some of
the basic concepts and problems in this field, as well as suggest
guidelines that might make it easier to decide on more objective
and adequate designing solutions.

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

: ( )
( ).
() (),
, .

.),
, .

:



;
,

, .

:

. ,

.

;
, (, )
,
.

:

(,
.);
,

(, ,

:

;

;

;

, .

.1.



Fig .1.
The main categories of internal living space openess

(. 1):
) ,
;
) ;
) ,
;
) () ,
, ;
) , ,
;
) .

,
. ,
, ,

67

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

.2.



Fig .2.
Example of vertical spatial
openess through the galleries on the first floor

,
.
(. 2) ,

.
,
,

. ,
,
.

. 3.



1,
Fig .3.
Alternative forms of openness of the living room in a
duplex on Liman 1, Novi Sad

68

(. 3):
)
;
) ,
(
);
) ,
( ,
, .);
)
(, , .);
) ,
, .

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

. ,


. ,
(. 4, 5),
,
.

.4.

Fig .4.
Relations between residential
functions

:

, (, ,
, .);

,
(, , .);

,

(, , , , , .).

,

:

(
);

( , , ,
, , .);

( , ,
, .);

( , , .);

(, ,
, .).

, .

.5.


Fig .5.
Impacts of housing function on the formation of
space and room in the apartment

:

,

,

,

.


, ,


.
***

69

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

. . (F. L. Wright),
K (Le Corbusier) (Mies van
der Rohe).
XX ,

.

(Robie house), , . .

,
,
.

,
(. 6)

. 6.
( )
Fig .6.
Robie House (Frank Lloyd Wright)

.7.
(
)
Fig .7 - Unite Marseille (Le
Corbusier)

.

,

,
.

, (. 7).

(Lake Shore Drive) (. 8)

. ,
, ,
.
,
.
.

.9.
,
( )
Fig .9.
Interbau house, Berlin
(Mies van der Rohe)
70

.8.
,
Fig .8.
Lake Shore Drive, Chicago

(Interbau) 1957. .
(. 9),
,
.
,
.
, , ,

.
, ,
,

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

.
, .

.
.
.

,
,
, .
,

( ),


.


:

( , ,
, .) ;

(,
) ;

( ) ;

( ,
, ) 1, 2;

( ,
, , .).

:
+;
+;

+;
+;

, .


,
(.
10).
, , .
,
. , .

.10.


Fig .10.
Examples of living room
with dining area

.11.

Fig .11.
Examples of kitchen
with dining area

.
Breakfast room, u ,
, , .
, ,
(. 11-), .
,
, ,
(.11-).

71

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

() (. 11-).
( )
,
.


1955. ., ,
(. , . . ),

,
, - .
,
. ,
, . ,
-, Breakfast room Family room.
(. 12).

. 12.

Fig .12.
Examples of extended
entering communication

,
, .
,
(. 13).
( )

72

. 13.


Fig .13.
Example of extended internal
communication with dining area

, ,
,
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
, .
1 2 ,


,
. . 14-,
,
.
. 14-,

. . 14-,

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

. 14.

Fig .14.
Examples of living
room with incorporated sleeping

,

.
,

.
, .
,
.

,
(
). ,
.
,
,
, ,
. , , ,

.

:


,
,
, ;
,
( ,
)


;

(, ),

,
,
;

.


( , ,
.), .

,
:

;

,
,
, .;

;


( )
.
, , ,
.
,
(
)
. , !
,
,
, .
. ,
,

(. 3-).

73

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

( ), :
(), (), (),
() ,
(),
:
++
++
++
++
++
+++
+++
+++

74

,
, , ,

.

++
++

++

++

++

+++
+++

++++

.1.

Tab.1.
Types of function combining in residential spaces

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

,
,
.
, ,
, , ,
., , ,
,

.
, ,
, (.)
,
,
.
, , 50-

.
( )
,
,
(, , )
,
. 15.
,

.
,
.


, .

,
.
,
.
, ,
,

. ,
(. 16).
. ,
.
,
, , ,
.
, .
()
,
. :

.15.
( )
Fig .15.
Studio plan (Djordje Alfirevic)

.16.
2- , I ( ,
)
Fig .16.
Plan of apartment with 2 sleeping room, 1st phase
(Sanja Simonovic, Djordje Alfirevic)

) ,
;
)
;
)

,
. ,
,
(.17).
, .

(. 15). ,
.
.

, , ...

75

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

.
(. 15),

, , ,
:


;

.
,
,
, . ,
(. 17).
,
. 15 ( , , ,
).

... , , ,
- .
: , ,
?
, , ,
, .

.
,
.

.17.
2- , II (
, )
Fig .17.
Plan of apartment with 2 sleeping room, 2nd
phase (Sanja Simonovic, Djordje Alfirevic)

.18.



Fig .18 .
Plan of Schroder
house in day and
night mode

76

,
. ,
,

.
:
;

;
(
), .

,
.

, , (. 3-),

. , , , .
(GerritRietveld) (Schrder
House) (. 18).

 , 38/2013/ 66-77,

,
,
, , , .,
, , , , ,
.
, 50-
.
)
,
(
).
, , ,
, ,
, , .

,
, ,
, .
) ,
, :

,
( ,
);

(
) ;

().

( ,
.).

( , Family room,
Beackfast room, TV room, .).

,
(, , .).
.
)
.
.

( ,
). ,
,

.

) ,
,
,
.
.


.
) ,
,

, ,
.
,
( )

.
)

,
(
, ,
).

, ,

.
)

, .
,
, .

,

. ,
,
,
.
,
, ,
.

77

UDK BROJEVI: 711.434 ; 502.131.1:711.434

ID BROJ: 205527308
, DOI: doi:10.5937/a-u38-5150

()

INTEGRAL SUSTAINABILITY AS A BASIC (FUNDAMENTAL)

REQUIREMENT FOR (URBAN) INNOVATION

*, **, ***
: 2013, : 2013.

Abstract

,
.
, , ,
.

.
,
,
,
, ,

,
,

. ,
:
;
;

;

().

The authors are of the opinion that there is no alternative

to sustainable development, and discuss on thesis that
sustainability is now a key driver of innovation, but also its
essential requirement. This paper discusses the sustainability as a
concept that has, above all, the environmental, economic, social
and cultural dimension. The aim of the study was to understand
sustainability as a fundamental development principle and key
benchmark in organisation and development of cities in the
future. This paper explores the meaning of innovation processes,
sustainability and innovation in urban planning, innovative
approaches to sustainable urban development, initiatives in
urban sustainability, the key elements of the implementation,
modalities of providing financial resources for sustainable
projects of public interest, as well as identification of areas
suitable for innovation in urban planning, relying on the good
practices implemented through multi-sector sustainable
projects. In a broader sense, the objective of this paper is to
emphasize the need: to promote concept of human dimension
in urban development, to direct continual urban development
towards green orientation, to implement innovative and
smart technologies in the management of modern cities; to
promote public participation and multi-sectoral policies in urban
development, and to encourage and stimulate sustainable
(urban) innovation.

: , , ,
,

Keywords: sustainability, innovation, urban innovation, urban

planning, multi-sectoral policy.

78

, ..

marija.lalosevic@urbel.com
** .
,
spokrajac@mas.bg.ac.rs
*** ..
,
mmilos@mas.bg.ac.rs

 , , , 38/2013/ 78-83, ()

21. .

,




.
.

, ,
,
.



.
, ,
, .

: ,
, , ,
.
, : (1)
, (2)
(multi-stakeholder dialogue),
,
( ), (3)
.

.

. (Landry 2000),


.

,
, , ,
. (Perlman
1990),
, ,
.
,

.

.

,
,
,
, ,
.

,
,


,
,
(.
,
, ).

,
.

,
:
, (Quartiers en Crise, Belgium)
-, (Kemi-Tornio, Finland)
-, (Duisburg-Marxloh,
Germany)
, , (Freiburg, Forum Vauban,
Germany)
, , (Oslo, Old Town, Norway)
, , (Hammarby Sjstad,
Stockholm, Sweden)
, , (Western Harbour,
Malme, Sweden).



:
;

;

.

,

. ,

79

 , , , 38/2013/ 78-83, ()

,

.
,
.
,
.
, .
(PPP Public Private
Partnership, P3 Projects
P3s)
/,
. je

.
, ,
, ,

,
.
,

. ,
,

. ,

.

,
. ,

:

80

,
.
,
.
, ,

,
.

.


.

.
,

,

.

,
.

,
.

,
, ,
.
( )
. ,
,
.
,

,
.
,
.
,
. ,

,
.


.

.


.


,
, .

:
.

 , , , 38/2013/ 78-83, ()

,
, ,
, , ,
, . ,
, ,
,

, , .
(. 1, 2, 3).
:
,
;
; ,
,
.

,
,
(. 4, 5, 6,7).


.

:

? : ,


? ,
, ? ,

. ,
,
.


,
.
,
,

.


,
, .
, ,
. ,
,

,
.1

() : High line Park, .

50- 19.
2009. . ,
,

, ,
.
. 1, 2, 3.
, .
High line Park,

(New
, .
York)
Fig. 1, 2, 3.
High line Park,
New York

,

carbon-neutral thinking
. ,
, 6 km,
2009. . , - ,

(Fosters and Partners). ,

, , role model
?

81

 , , , 38/2013/ 78-83, ()

. 4, 5, 6, 7.

Fig. 4, 5, 6, 7.
Savamala quarter in Belgrade during
Mikser Festival

.
,
.

. , ,
,
.
.
,

82

. , Hckische
Hfe , Cable Factory , Temple Bar ,
Custard Factory . , ,

( , Mikser Urban lab, :
.), ,

.

 , , , 38/2013/ 78-83, ()

:
Gehl Architects (2004) Places for people, Melbourne, City of
Melbourne
Gel, . (ur.) Marija Laloevi, Marta Vukoti Lazar (2010): ivot
meu zgradama Korienje javnog prostora, Beograd,
Urbanistiki zavod Beograda
Hall, P. & Landry, C. (1997) Innovative and Sustainable Cities,
Ireland, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living
and Working Conditons
Jodidio, P. (2009)Green Architecture now,Germany, Taschen
Landry, C. (2000) The Creative City a Toolkit for Urban
Innovators, London, Earthscan Publications
Lehmann-Waffenschmidt, M. (2007) Innovations Towards
Sustainability, Germany, Physica-Verlag
Perlmann, J. E. (1990) A dual strategy for deliberate social
change in cities, CITIES, vol 7, . 1, pp. 315.

Pokrajac, S. (2010) Preduzetnitvo izazovi i putevi kreativne

destrukcije privrede Srbije, Beograd, Mainski fakultet
Univerziteta u Beogradu
Pokrajac, S., N. Dondur, T. Pokrajac, S. Grbi (2011): Javno
privatno partnerstvo kao vid finansiranja infrastrukturnih
investicija, Ekonomski vidici, vol. 16, . 3, str. 439450.
Schieifer, S.K. (Editorial coordinator) (2009): Green style,
Barcelona, booQs
Tachen, A. (1997): Hundertwasser Architecture: For a More
Human Architecture in Harmony With Nature, Germany,
Taschen
Zeiher, L. C. (1996): TheEcology of Architecture, New York,
Whitney
:
83

, xix

, A
e

: . .

( 24. 04. 2013. . )

?

.
,

.
. ,
, .

85

,
, ,
,
. ,

. ,
.

.
?

.
.
, ,

.
, , .

,
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
,
. ,
,
.

. ,
.


,
.
(,
, , ,
.)
? ,
?
,
.
,
,
.
,
, .


?

86

,
,


.
.
,

.
, .

, , ,
.
,
, ,
, , .
,
.
,
.
, .

.

,

,
?
, ,
, ,
, . , ,

.

, ,
, , ,
, , ,
.

?


.
.
.

? ,
?

,

, , -
, .
, ,
.

,


,
.
,

 ,
.

: ,
(), ,
?

, ,
,

,

.

, ,
.
,

.

,
,
? , ?

.

. ,

.
, ,

, .


.


(, , .)?
, ,
?
,
, . , ,
, ,
, ,
. ,
,
, .

, , , .,
,

.

.
,
.

?

,
. -
,
- .

. ,
, .

?

?

,

.
.
,
. ,
.
, .

?

, ,
. ,

. ,
,
.
,
.
,

.
,
,
.

87


,
.
,
,
,
,
.

,
?

,
,
.
:
,
?
,
.
,
,
.

,
. , ,
?
, ?
, :
,
,
;
; ;
,
;

,
.

?
, ?
88

,
,
. ,
,
.

,
,
?

:
,
. ,
,
, , ,
.

,
.

, .
?

. ,
,

.
,
ullshit ,

.

?

?

.

Urban Incubator featuring

22. 06 05. 07. 2013. .
, 2,

:
. . , . ,

. ,
.
.
,

.
: ,
.
, ,
,
.

,

.
,
.

.
, ,
, /
.

. ,



,
, - ,
- .

.

.


. .
. , ,
. ,
(. 1 2),
(. 3),
(. 4), (. 5, 6),
Urban Incubator
,
.

. 1. 2.

89

. 3. 4.

 5. 6.

,

. , ,
top-down bottom-up
(. 7.).


,
, .
,
(.
8) (. 9.),
22. 06 05. 07. 2013. .
Urban Incubator ,

Nextsavamala .
,

: ,

. 7.

,
, .

.


: ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, .

-
36035 , ,

, ,
.
, ...,

. 8.
Urban Incubator featuring :

90

. 9.

 e

:

:
:
, 2013.

, ,
.
,
, ,
,
,
.
,
. , ,
,
, :
, .
, .
:
, , .
,
, ,
,
. :
, ,

,
, , .

91

 :
, .
:
; ;
,
, ; ,
, .
e : ,
e ,
.
, .
, .
, .

.
.
, ,
, , ,

.
,

. , ,
,
.

92

94

.
16
2,5 cm ( 28 800 - Characters
with spces),
.
ASEESTANT.

ASEESTANT
www.iaus.ac.rs/code/navigate.
aspx?Id=111 ASEESTANT
http://aseestant.ceon.
rs/index.php/a-u/
.
, ,
, . .
,
( )
.
,
- www.iaus.ac.rs
e-mail.
:
:
:

,
.
.
ASEESTANT
/
/ () () ( / ).
.
, , , -mail
. ,
*, ** ***.
:

200 .

.
. .
:
.
.
.
, ,
.

. , .

, , .
.

(.: , , , ...), Insert
Symbol (Word).
,
, ( ) .

,

.
, , ,
, .
:

. 1, e-mail
.

:
, ,
.
. :
(. 1) (. 1). .
Fig.
ASEESTANT 4:
.
:

, ,
, , .

:
:
;
; ( ); ,
( italic), (bold), (
). ( : ),
( ).
:
: Radosavljevi, R. (1995): Osnovi zatite graditeljskog
naslea jezgra Novog Sada, Arhitektura i urbanizam 2, str. 2332;
: Brki, A. (1992): Znakovi u kamenu, Beograd, Savez
arhitekata Srbije, 242243;
, : (Brki, 1992:243).
,
.
, .
:

, ,
. , ,
.
,
.
:
,
.
:
: Microsoft Word (*.doc *.docx);
Microsoft Word (*.doc *.docx);
, .: Adobe Illustrator; InDesign;

, .: TIFF ( 300 pixels/inch,
CMYK) ;
,
;
,
.;
(
);
;
;

.
CIP
, 71/72
: ,
/ .
. 1, . 1
(1. 1994) - . ( 73/II) :
, 1994. 30cm

ISSN 0354 6055 ( ) =

ISSN 2217-8074 (Online)
COBISS.SR-ID 8014860