Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Project Coordinator
Landscape Architect
Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Janie Romoff, General Manager
Tel: 416-338-3327
Fax:416.392-3355
E-mail: nstuart@toronto.ca
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
The above noted Request for Proposals closed on September 30, 2015 and seven (7) proposals were
reviewed. The 5-member evaluation team completed its evaluation of the submissions against the criteria
set out in the Request for Proposals and the three firms of DTAH, The Planning Partnership and GH3
passed the technical evaluation.
The second envelope was opened for each of these three proponents and the scores were adjusted
accordingly. The results are summarized below.
Rank
1.
2.
3.
Proponent
DTAH
The Planning Partnership
GH3
Fee
$295,238.49
$387,024.89
$322.050.00
I have attached the Proposal Evaluation Spreadsheet in excel format including technical scores for all
proponents and price scoring for the above-mentioned proponents.
We recommend that DTAH, being the highest scoring proponent meeting all mandatory requirements and
specifications be awarded the Humber Bay Park Master Plan Project in the amount of $295,238.49.
Should you accept our recommendation, please forward a copy of the completed Purchase Order to
myself at Metro Hall
Thank you very much for your assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
PFR
_________________________________
Netami Stuart, Project Coordinator Landscape Architect
PFR-PD&CP
PFR
Netami Stuart
Project Coordinator
Landscape Architect
Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Janie Romoff, General Manager
Tel: 416-338-3327
Fax:416.392-3355
E-mail: nstuart@toronto.ca
DATE:
November 9, 2015
TO:
FROM:
RE:
The above noted Request for Proposals closed on September 30, 2015 and seven (7) proposals were
reviewed. The 5-member evaluation team completed its evaluation of the submissions against the criteria
set out in the Request for Proposals and the three firms of DTAH, The Planning Partnership and GH3
passed the technical evaluation.
Please open the following Proponents' second envelope, containing their submitted prices.
Rank
1.
2.
3.
Proponent
The Planning Partnership
DTAH
GH3
I have attached the Proposal Evaluation Spreadsheet in excel format including technical scores for all
proponents, and non disclosure conflict of interest form for the evaluation team.
Thank you very much for your assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
_________________________________
Netami Stuart, Project Coordinator Landscape Architect
PFR-PD&CP
PFR
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie Coates
December-29-14 9:19 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Re: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update
Re: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update.txt
Hi Netami,
I'm going to start to send you a few files on Humber Bay Parks as per attached.
Leslie
PFR
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie Coates
December-29-14 9:26 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Re: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update
Re: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update.txt
PFR
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie Coates
December-29-14 9:28 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update
Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update.txt
PFR
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie Coates
January-05-15 11:39 AM
cpinto@trca.on.ca; NGaffney@trca.on.ca
Jane Weninger; Netami Stuart
Fwd: Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico
Harbour)
Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico Harbour).txt
All best,
Leslie
(416) 392-1885
PFR
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie,
Nancy received a hard copy of the package. TRCA has no objection to the proposed naming. It would be advisable to
contact the local boat clubs to ensure they are aware of the process and have the opportunity to complete the
questionnaire by the January 15 deadline.
Best regards,
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 70 Canuck Avenue, Toronto, ON | M3K 2C5 | 416.661.6600 ext.
5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca
The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
From:
"Leslie Coates" <lcoates@toronto.ca>
To:
<cpinto@trca.on.ca>, <NGaffney@trca.on.ca>,
Cc:
"Jane Weninger" <jwening@toronto.ca>, "Netami Stuart" <nstuart@toronto.ca>
Date:
01/05/2015 11:38 AM
Subject:
Fwd: Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico Harbour)
All best,
Leslie
(416) 392-1885
----- Message from "Marinel Cruz" <mcruz2@toronto.ca> on Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:50:42 -0500 -----
PFR
Subject: Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico Harbour)
Hi Leslie:
Richard reviewed the attached and suggested that you look into this. He said you may want to check with City
Suveryor's office. Please update the GM's office re. action taken.
Happy New Year!
Marinel
[attachment "Scan 001.pdf" deleted by Connie Pinto/MTRCA]
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."
PFR
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Tara Congram
January-05-15 3:19 PM
Leslie Coates; Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis
Re: Humber Bay East and West
PARK760 Humber Bay Shores-Parks Revitalization S42.pdf; T&P253 Humber Bay
Shores Park Construction - PF&R Transp.pdf; Humber Bay Shores & Humber Bay Pks
Projects in 2015 Cap Bud Jan 5 14.xlsx
Hi Leslie,
Thank you! Happy New Year!
Section 14(1)
I have attached the Captor reports as well as the 2015 Capital Plan and 2016-2024 Capital Forecast for the Humber Bay
Shores and Humber Bay Parks. Please keep in mind this is not yet approved by Council (goes before Council in March
2015). Lori Ellis has been assigned on the capital side for the Humber Bay Shores projects.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Tara
>>> Leslie Coates 12/31/2014 10:10 AM >>>
Hello Tara:
Happy belated Christmas and Happy New Year!
Netami Stuart starts with the Special Projects section on Monday. One of her key projects will be the Humber Bay East
and West Revitalization Plan. Would you be able to send me the final C2 request that went in for funding for this
work. This is not for circulation it is just to bring Netami up to date on her workplan for 2015.
Many thanks.
Leslie
PFR
10
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Leslie Coates
January-05-15 3:58 PM
Tara Congram; Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis
Re: Humber Bay East and West
Tara,
Thanks for Humber Bay updates. Netami will be the lead on the Humber Bay Parks work. We will likely have more
questions but this info is a good start.
Leslie
Section 14(1)
PFR
11
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie Coates
January-07-15 7:47 AM
Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis
Fwd: RE: Humber Bay West _ Boat Launches
Fwd: RE: Humber Bay West _ Boat Launches.txt
Hi Netami,
Electronic version of boat launch info.
Leslie
PFR
12
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie Coates
January-07-15 7:49 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Humber Bay Docks _ Preliminary Designs
Fwd: Humber Bay Docks _ Preliminary Designs.txt
Hello Netami,
I've attached more info including the preliminary design for the ponds at Humber Bay East - note that this shows a
rebuild of existing condition. I think we should evaluate a wider range of options.
Leslie
10
PFR
13
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kerry Ferguson
January-08-15 9:36 AM
Bruce Mcpherson; Netami Stuart
Bill Moore
Re: Fwd: Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico
Harbour)
Netami:
Bruce asked me to respond to you.
We actually have no experience with this type of request, but we do manage the naming of streets across the City, and
so I will apply our logic and policy for street naming to this request.
We have a street, "Mimico Avenue", in the proximity of the harbour which we would consider to be a duplicate of the
proposed name "Mimico Harbour".
Duplication of names could potentially cause confusion for 1st responders, and therefore my recommendation
is to object to this name based on it being a duplicate of an existing street name in the area.
I see no problem with the name, "Etobicoke Point"
Thank you,
Kerry Ferguson, OLS
Senior Ontario Land Surveyor
Engineering & Construction Services
Engineering Support Services
City of Toronto,
18 Dyas Road, 4th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M3B 1V5
P: 416-392-7757,
F: 416-392-0081,
E: kferguso@toronto.ca
>>> Netami Stuart January 7, 2015 12:31 PM >>>
Hello Bruce,
I am emailing to ask your opinion about the MNR's questionnaire to name two geographic features. The
questionionnaires can be found at:
www.sse.gov.on.ca/sites/MNR-publicdocs/en/cmid/gnq-MimicoHarbour-eng-2014-11-20_distributed.pdf
http://www.sse.gov.on.ca/sites/MNR-publicdocs/en/cmid/gnq-EtobicokePoint-eng-2014-11-20_distributed.pdf
I have been tasked with PF&R's response to this application and I hope that you have some experience with this type of
thing that you can share with me.
The deadline for response to the questionnaire is January 15, so I'm hoping you can let me know before the end of the
week.
Thanks,
11
PFR
14
12
PFR
15
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Leslie Coates
January-09-15 8:56 AM
CWoodland@trca.on.ca
Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Park
Hello Carolyn:
Lovely to see you yesterday and to know what we can talk about Humber Bay Park. Do you have any meetings planned
in and around the downtown in the next two weeks? We can come meet you at a place that would be convenient.
Looking forward to seeing you.
Best, Leslie
13
PFR
16
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Enkhjargal Darisuren
January-09-15 11:51 AM
Netami Stuart
Re: Humber Bay Park East & West
humberbay east.xls; humberbay west.xls
Hi Netami,
I have Parks Title History file "Humber Bay Promenade Park - Easement
(2285 - 2289 Lake Shore Blvd, West)"
Also other files related to this title...please see the attached
Enke
>>> Netami Stuart 2015-01-09 11:30 AM >>>
Hi Enke,
Do you have a file with plans of Humber Bay Park East and Humber Bay Park West?
Thanks,
Netami
14
PFR
17
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami
IwouldbepleasedtotalkwithyouaboutHumberBayParks.IaminthePortHopearea,whichisalittleoveran
houraway,andwouldbegladtohaveyouvisit.OrImaybecomingtoTorontowithinthenextweekortwoandcould
stopbyyouroffice.Ifyouhavepreferencespleaseletmeknow.
I'mpleasedtohearofanupdateproject.Timeshaveindeedchangedsincethe70'sandtherearemanypotentials.
BradJohnson
OALAFCSLARCA
BradJohnson+AssociatesLimited
9057972725
On20150109,at12:03PM,NetamiStuartwrote:
>DearBradJohnson,
>
>IamalandscapearchitectinParks,Forestry&RecreationattheCityofToronto.ThisyearIwillbecoordinatinga
projecttocreateanewmasterplanforHumberBayParksandIamhopingthatIcantalktoyouabouttheoriginal
masterplananddesign.Ithinkourprocesswouldbewellinformedtounderstandhowtheoriginalplanwasdeveloped,
howtheprocessunfoldedandwhatthemaindesignintentwas.Wedonotwanttolosesightoftheoriginalintentin
thisprojecttorevitalizetheparkandaccommodatewithinitthechanginglocaldemographics.
>
>PleasecalloremailanytimeyouareavailbletodiscussHumberBayParks.Ilookforwardtohearingfromyou.
>
>BestRegards,
>
>
>NetamiStuartOALA
>SpecialProjects
>Parks,Forestry&Recreation
>55JohnStreet,24thfloor,M5V3C6
>4163383327
15
PFR
18
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Lori Ellis
January-09-15 4:37 PM
Netami Stuart
Leslie Coates
Humber Bay Park Revitalization - Information
Netami,
Most project information transferred to the the following location:
M:\Districts\CityWide\PDIM\SPECIAL PROJECTS\SP-PROJECTS\Humber Bay Park - Revitalization
I will transfer the remaining next week -aerial and mapping.
Lori
Lori Ellis
CityofToronto
Parks,Forestry+Recreation
LandscapeArchitect,OALA,CSLA
SeniorProjectCoordinator,PDCP
t416.394.2483
16
PFR
19
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami,
I was about to call you on the same subject! I'm here all day but I won't be part of the Scarborough meeting.
My office is three doors down from the Waterfront meeting room so come by anytime before or after your meeting and we
can chat.
See you then,
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 70 Canuck Avenue, Toronto, ON | M3K 2C5 | 416.661.6600 ext.
5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca
The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."
17
PFR
20
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jorge Ture
January-12-15 12:45 PM
Netami Stuart
Leslie Coates
Re: contacts at Humber Bay/Etobicoke Yacht clubs
fskwnbfotolc.image_161.bmp
Hi Netami
Welcome Back and Happy New Year to you also.
I don't see any contact information in Dave's old files. Suggest Google or Lease and Agreements section.
Jorge Ture
Park Supervisor
South Etobicoke - Wards 5 & 6
18
PFR
21
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami
I hope you rec'd My ,earlier reponse. I am available , with some exceptions , until jan 29
Brad johnson
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 9, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Netami Stuart <nstuart@toronto.ca> wrote:
Dear Brad Johnson,
I am a landscape architect in Parks, Forestry & Recreation at the City of Toronto. This year I
will be coordinating a project to create a new master plan for Humber Bay Parks and I am
hoping that I can talk to you about the original master plan and design. I think our process would
be well informed to understand how the original plan was developed, how the process unfolded
and what the main design intent was. We do not want to lose sight of the original intent in this
project to revitalize the park and accommodate within it the changing local demographics.
Please call or email anytime you are availble to discuss Humber Bay Parks. I look forward to
hearing from you.
Best Regards,
Netami Stuart OALA
Special Projects
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
55 John Street, 24th floor, M5V 3C6
416-338-3327
19
PFR
22
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kristi Evans
January-15-15 1:35 PM
Netami Stuart
Staff Report
Hi Netami,
Attached is a link to the Staff Report online =)
http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-64533.pdf
Let me know if you can access it.
Thanks,
Kris Evans
20
PFR
23
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie Coates
January-16-15 2:54 PM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Re: Humber Bay Park design history
Re: Humber Bay Park design history.txt
s. 14(1)
21
PFR
24
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leslie Coates
January-21-15 9:26 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Shorelines - Winter 2015
Shorelines - Winter 2015.txt
22
PFR
25
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
mhcopy
January-23-15 1:44 PM
Netami Stuart
LARGE MAPS
scan088.pdf; scan089.pdf; scan090.pdf; scan091.pdf; scan092.pdf; scan093.pdf;
scan094.pdf; scan095.pdf; scan096.pdf; scan097.pdf; scan098.pdf; scan100.pdf;
scan101.pdf; scan102.pdf; scan105.pdf
Importance:
High
Hi Netami,
Attached on this email are the PDF format of your maps.
Thanks and have a great day.
MH COPY
23
PFR
26
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Bob Duguid
January-27-15 1:45 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: RFP for an MP
13-5071 - QP North revFINAL Oct 16 13.docx; 13-5074 Add Nr01 revFINAL.docx;
13-5071 Add Nr02 rev02 BDv2.docx; 13-5071 Add Nr03 rev03.docx
24
PFR
27
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
HiNetami
IhadhopedtogetintoTorontotoseeyouduringthelast2weeksbutcouldn'tmanageit.
(withaccesstoemail)andIfyouwouldstillliketomeetIwillbeabletodosoinMarch.
BradJohnson
On20150113,at9:48AM,NetamiStuartwrote:
>HiBrad,
>Thanksforyouremail,Iappreciateyougettingbacktome.IwishIcouldgoouttoPortHopeonbehalfoftheCityof
Toronto,howeverintheinterestsofefficiencyIthinkwemayhavetotalkonthephone.Orwhenyouareinthecitywe
couldsitdownforanhouratalocationconvenientforyou.
>
>IwillbereceivingacopyoftheoriginalplansfromtheTRCAinthenextcoupleofweeksandIwouldliketohavea
lookatthemandrefertothemwhenwetalk.
>
>PleaseletmeknowwhenIcancallyouor,alternativelywhereandwhenwecanmeetonyournexttriptoToronto.
>
>Thanks,
>Netami
>
>
>NetamiStuartOALA
>SpecialProjects
s. 14(1)
>Parks,Forestry&Recreation
>55JohnStreet,24thfloor,M5V3C6
>4163383327
>>>>BradJohnson<brad3214@gmail.com>01/12/20151:16PM>>>
>Netami
>
>Ihopeyourec'dMy,earlierreponse.Iamavailable,withsomeexceptions,untiljan29
>
>Bradjohnson
>
>SentfrommyiPad
>
>OnJan9,2015,at12:03PM,NetamiStuart<nstuart@toronto.ca>wrote:
>
>>DearBradJohnson,
>>
25
PFR
28
>>IamalandscapearchitectinParks,Forestry&RecreationattheCityofToronto.ThisyearIwillbecoordinatinga
projecttocreateanewmasterplanforHumberBayParksandIamhopingthatIcantalktoyouabouttheoriginal
masterplananddesign.Ithinkourprocesswouldbewellinformedtounderstandhowtheoriginalplanwasdeveloped,
howtheprocessunfoldedandwhatthemaindesignintentwas.Wedonotwanttolosesightoftheoriginalintentin
thisprojecttorevitalizetheparkandaccommodatewithinitthechanginglocaldemographics.
>>
>>PleasecalloremailanytimeyouareavailbletodiscussHumberBayParks.Ilookforwardtohearingfromyou.
>>
>>BestRegards,
>>
>>
>>NetamiStuartOALA
>>SpecialProjects
>>Parks,Forestry&Recreation
>>55JohnStreet,24thfloor,M5V3C6
>>4163383327
26
PFR
29
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jennifer Hyland
January-29-15 3:26 PM
Lori Ellis; Netami Stuart
Re: bike & ped traffic @ Humber Bay
Martin Goodman Trail West.xls
I have cyclist counts but no pedestrian counts for the Western MGT (at the Humber bridge) from 2013.
Hope these help.
Jen
>>> Lori Ellis 01/29/2015 2:59 PM >>>
Netami,
I should have this in my files. There are bike counts that have been done - around 2013? Embarrassing that I cannot
find them in my files - Sadly but graciously I defer to Jen for this information.
Lori
>>> Netami Stuart 01/29/2015 2:02 PM >>>
HI there,
I'm wondering if there are any recent counts for bike & ped traffic at Humber Bay Parks west of Humber Bay
Shores. Even if you have info for Humber Bay Shores that would be useful.
Thanks,
Netami
27
PFR
30
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Marc Kramer
February-02-15 10:57 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Humber Bay Parks
Humber Bay Parks.txt
28
PFR
31
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lori Ellis
February-04-15 11:30 AM
Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Park East and West - UF Contact
29
PFR
32
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Janette Harvey
February-11-15 2:21 PM
Scott Laver; Netami Stuart
Leslie Coates; Lori Ellis
Re: Humber Bay Park
Hi Netami,
We can contribute to restoration & trails work, and we can participate during the master planning process. I've got lots
of contacts in the area, which may be of some use to you during the public consultation phase.
We have a budget for plant material, and potentially a budget for some trail work (depending on the scope of what is
proposed - we would have to discuss this in greater detail at some point). We also have a substantial base of volunteers
in the area and as you know we are always looking for areas to engage these volunteers, so if there is an opportunity to
involve them in any restoration components (where appropriate), we would love to help with that.
Janette
30
PFR
33
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
February-23-15 7:28 PM
Garth Armour; Scott Laver; Emilia Floro; Carly Bowman; Richard Beck; Carson Wiseman;
Rick Helary; Bruce Clayton; Steve Garvin; Netami Stuart; Ngaffney@trca.on.ca;
Jim.Sinikas@ttc.ca; Mary-Ann.George@ttc.ca
Stephen O'Bright; Jennifer Hyland; RJordan@elac.ca
Humber Bay Shores Park - Trail Improvements - PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REVIEW
HBShores Plans -TAC Mtg-Feb24th 2015.pdf
Lori Ellis
CityofToronto
Parks,Forestry+Recreation
LandscapeArchitect,OALA,CSLA
SeniorProjectCoordinator,PDCP
t416.394.2483
31
PFR
34
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Carly,
Further to our brief conversation yesterday about the above site, Councillor Grimes has requested that TRCA provide a
plan to address concerns related to vegetation growth in and around the pond, viewing opportunities and obstructions,
and general maintenance of the pond. I have asked our restoration services staff to recommend possible modifications to
the pond to address these concerns. I will work with our staff and Netami to develop a plan which we will share with the
councillor.
If you have any concerns or suggestions, please don't hesitate to contact Netami or myself.
Best regards,
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 5 Shoreham Drive, Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 | 416.661.6600 ext.
5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca
The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."
32
PFR
35
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Carly Bowman
February-25-15 11:50 AM
Connie Pinto
Netami Stuart
Re: Jean Augustine Park - pond
IMAGE.jpeg
Connie, thanks very much for this. Please let us know what sort of solution is eventually devised.
Nice to meet you and Netami in person yesterday.
Best,
Carly
CarlyBowman,MScPl,MCIP,RPP
SeniorPlanner,CommunityPlanning
EtobicokeYorkDistrict
2 Civic Centre Court, 3rd Floor
Toronto, ON M9C 5A3
t:4163948228
e:cbowman2@toronto.ca
The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and
may be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete
it permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."
33
PFR
36
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami,
I had a conversation with our restoration staff this morning on this subject. I would like to take you up on your offer to
prepare a concept plan for the councillor, which he can share with the HBCA. Then I can work with our staff to prepare
detailed designs, costing and scheduling. I would like to talk to you further regarding what it might look like. I really want
to maintain the function of the pond, while improving the look of it for the local residents.
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 5 Shoreham Drive, Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 | 416.661.6600 ext.
5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca
The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."
34
PFR
37
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Councillor Grimes
March-02-15 12:39 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: West Humber Off Leash
IMAGE.BMP
s. 14(1)
Hi
Thank you for writing to Councillor Grimes with your thoughts. The City is undertaking a master plan later this year for
Humber Bay Parks East and West to take into account everything that's currently in the parks, what needs to be
improved, and what needs to be changed. The master plan is an entire re-thinking of the current parks. This off-leash
area can be considered for this as this park has funding for change.
I have copied Netami Stuart, the project lead, on this email. Netami, please see
them in the notes for the Humber Bay Parks East and West Master Plan.
Best regards,
Victoria Stefaniak
Administrative Assistant
IF YOU HAVE SCHEDULED A MEETING WITH ANYONE IN COUNCILLOR GRIMES OFFICE, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT YOU MAY BE
REQUIRED TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST. CITY COUNCIL REGULATIONS ARE BROAD IN THE DEFINITION OF LOBBYING, SO
35
PFR
38
REGARDLESS OF THE NATURE OF YOUR REQUESTED MEETING YOU ARE ADVISED TO CHECK FOR MORE INFORMATION AT:
http://www.toronto.ca/lobbying/index.htm
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission,
dissemination, copying, forwarding, distribution or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all
attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same.
>>>
Hi;
As a frequent user of the West Humber Off Leash park, I have a concern.
Most off leash parks have a double gate system at the entrance. This gives dog owners a small space to leash or unleash
their dog before entering or exiting the park. It also prevents other dogs in the park (that often run to the gate to greet
new dogs) from getting out.
Having a double gate would really help us in this park. Is this something that can be done?
I've attached a picture of an example double gate.
Also, there is one section of the off leash that is not fully secure and dogs can jump on a rock and escape from the area.
As someone with a dog that is a flight risk, it's a problem. A small addition to the existing fence would solve the
problem.
I would love to show someone this issue to see if we can fix it.
This is an amazing off leash park that is loved by many local dog owners. We welcome the opportunity to work with the
city to keep it safe for dogs and owners alike.
Thanks,
s. 14(1)
36
PFR
39
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hi Netami
I just wanted to let you know that Connie does not work for the TRCA anymore. I am aware of this work and I will follow
up with staff to make sure Kim gets what she needs as soon as possible. If you are working with Connie on any other
projects that you need action or information for please contact me directly and I will follow up with you quickly. You can
call me at 416 258 1409.
Have a good weekend.
Nancy
Nancy Gaffney BSc | Waterfront Specialist | Watershed Management Division | Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority |5 Shoreham Dr., Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 | 416.661.6600, ext. 5313 | 416.667.6278 | * ngaffney@trca.on.ca
From:
"Kim Edgar" <kedgar@toronto.ca>
To:
"Netami Stuart" <nstuart@toronto.ca>, "Connie Pinto" <CPinto@trca.on.ca>,
Date:
03/06/2015 03:05 PM
Subject:
Jean Augustin Pond & Fountain
Hi Ladies,
Connie, thanks for your call earlier this week. Please let me know as soon as possible when you have a
potential solution for the pond and fountain - Councillor Grimes and the community are eager to meet about it
but I am fending them off until I hear from you!
Thanks & have a good weekend,
Kim
KimEdgar
ExecutiveAssistant
toCouncillorMarkGrimes
Ward6,EtobicokeLakeshore
TorontoCityHall
100QueenStreetWest,SuiteC48
Toronto,ONM5H2N2
Tel:4163385167
37
PFR
40
Fax:4163979279
kedgar@toronto.ca
www.markgrimes.ca
StayConnected:
eNewsletterhttp://eepurl.com/Btg_5
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/Mark_Grimes
Facebookhttp://facebook.com/councillor.grimes
"RevitalizingOurCommunity"
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination,
copying, forwarding, distribution or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in
error, please contact the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing
same.
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."
38
PFR
41
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hi Netami,
I was wondering if you could get the report that I lent to you back to me for Humber Bay Shores Masterplan. It was my
only personal copy for my own work. I understand that Nancy Gaffney has also sent this material to your department for
your own use.
Thanks for the urgent attention to this matter.
Sorry to hear about Leslie - it is a great loss of corporate knowledge.
Carolyn
39
PFR
42
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
March-19-15 11:30 AM
Stephen O'Bright; Nicola (Nick) Garisto; Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Shores - Development Plan and Sect 37
HBay Shores - Section 37 - March 2015.pdf; Humber Bay Shores - Development
Activity-2015.pdf
Lori Ellis
CityofToronto
Parks,Forestry+Recreation
LandscapeArchitect,OALA,CSLA
SeniorProjectCoordinator,PDCP
t416.394.2483
40
PFR
43
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Michael Schreiner
March-20-15 9:51 AM
Stephen O'Bright; Nicola (Nick) Garisto; Lori Ellis; Netami Stuart
CIL amounts received by years
CIL Received 2004 - 2014.pdf
41
PFR
44
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jorge Ture
March-27-15 8:47 AM
Netami Stuart
Donna Kovachis; Helen Sousa; Stephen O'Bright; NGaffney@trca.on.ca
Re: Jean Augustine Pond
IMAGE.BMP
Jorge Ture
Park Supervisor
South Etobicoke - Wards 5 & 6
PFR
45
elsewhere. This would solve the problem in the short term. A long term solution would involve building decking around
the pond to prevent cattail growth in the future. As far as I know this is not in anyone's budget or work plan.
I am emailing you all because I told Kim Edgar in the councillor's office that I would find out if anyone had any plans to
do anything about these cattails.
If you or your staff have plans to address the councillor's desire to have the cattails removed, please let me know.
If you would like to develop plans to remove the cattails, please let me know and I'll tell Kim you're working on it.
Otherwise, I will let her know that she should get in touch with you in writing in order to have the issue addressed.
all the best,
Netami
43
PFR
46
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
March-27-15 5:33 PM
Garth Armour; Jorge Ture; Donna Kovachis; Helen Sousa; Scott Laver; Stephen
O'Bright; Julia Murnaghan; Sabrina Buson; Emilia Floro; Sabrina Salatino; Bill Kiru; Carly
Bowman; Kathryn Thom; Lara Tarlo; Richard Beck; Carson Wiseman; Jean-Paul Pontet;
Rick Helary; Bruce Clayton; Steve Garvin; Netami Stuart; Tom Mefailoski; Connie Pinto;
Nancy Gaffney; Jim.Sinikas@ttc.ca; Mary-Ann.George@ttc.ca; Mitch Stambler;
Rob.Gillard@ttc.ca
Jennifer Hyland; Erik#032#Lees#032#; Reinaldo#032#Jordan#032#
Humber Bay Shores Park - Public Event - APRIL 9th 2015
2015 03 19 Humber - Public Event Flyer FINAL1.pdf
Lori Ellis
CityofToronto
Parks,Forestry+Recreation
LandscapeArchitect,OALA,CSLA
SeniorProjectCoordinator,PDCP
t416.394.2483
44
PFR
47
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
May-05-15 9:57 AM
Lori Ellis
Humber Bay E&W
hbe&w_RFP_topurchasing_5May2015.docx
Hereyougo.Doyourbesttogetthislookedatsooooon.Iwanttodosomethinguseful!
Thanks!
n
45
PFR
48
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
May-19-15 5:21 PM
Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Park EW - RFP final few edits - please review - then will send
HBayPark-EW RFP-toPMMD-May19-2015.docx
Netami,
Takealookminoreditsinclude:
typosandtext
someadditionaldeliverableswithrespecttocommentsheets/andhandoutsforengagementand
webpagedeliverables(AODAcompliantformat)
oneextrameetinginConceptDesign/MPlan(6total)
DetailedDesign(3total)
SummaryofOperatingImpactstoCapitalinManagementPlanphase
NeedAppendixF1andF2AerialContextandSiteMeetinglocationmap.
IfaokwithyouwillsendtopurchasingtomorrowMay20!
Lori
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:May05159:57AM
To:LoriEllis
Subject:HumberBayE&W
Hereyougo.Doyourbesttogetthislookedatsooooon.Iwanttodosomethinguseful!
Thanks!
n
46
PFR
49
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
May-28-15 12:01 PM
Mike Voelker
Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Shores Park - Park Masterplan
Humber Bay Parks-Project Area.pdf; Park Map-46G.pdf; HBayPark-EW RFP-toPMMDMay28-2015.docx
Mike,
Attached here is a Draft RFP for Park Masterplan work at Humber Bay Shores Park in Ward 6.
Maps also attached for your reference. NOTE: Appendices are not included in this submission and will follow with the
next revision.
Please confirm receipt of this e-mail and the attached documents and provide a time-line for review of Draft 1
Thank-you kindly,
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
47
PFR
50
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
May-29-15 7:13 AM
Lori Ellis
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Shores Park - Park Masterplan
From:LoriEllis
Sent:May28,201512:01
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayShoresParkParkMasterplan
Mike,
Attached here is a Draft RFP for Park Masterplan work at Humber Bay Shores Park in Ward 6.
Maps also attached for your reference. NOTE: Appendices are not included in this submission and will follow
with the next revision.
Please confirm receipt of this e-mail and the attached documents and provide a time-line for review of
Draft 1
Thank-you kindly,
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
48
PFR
51
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Lori Ellis
June-08-15 9:01 AM
Mike Voelker
Netami Stuart; Alex Mut
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay shores and new RFP template
Mike,
GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!
AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.
Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention
YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.
Thanksagain,
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv
49
PFR
52
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
June-22-15 1:02 PM
Mike Voelker
Netami Stuart
FW: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West - UPDATED RFP template and
attachments
HBayPark-EW RFP-Rev2_newtemplate.docx; AppendixF1_aerialcontext.JPG; AppendixF2
_sitemeeting.jpg; AppendixF3_Contractor_asset_inventory_form.pdf; AppendixF4
_Contractor_Performance_Evaluation.jpg; Contractor Performance Evaluation
Template.pdf
Mike,
As requested Please see attached RFP for 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West.
Please confirm when received and provide me with a time-line for follow-up Thanks.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
From:LoriEllis
Sent:June08159:01AM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart;AlexMut
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Mike,
GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!
AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.
Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention
YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.
50
PFR
53
Thanksagain,
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv
51
PFR
54
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
July-05-15 10:28 AM
Lori Ellis
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West - UPDATED RFP template and
attachments
Hello,Lori'
Hadalookatyourdocandfindthatitisn'tthelatesttemplate:
1/themanagerislistedasDavidFerguson,who'snotbeenwiththeCityforoverayear.
2/thecallnumberdatesto2013
3/thePanAminformationwasmissing
4/Insection1,definitionsweremissing(well,oneanywayandthat'sasfarasIgot)
IcouldoverlookacoupleofthingsbutpleaseunderstandI'veunfortunatelynotthetimerightnowtogothroughthe
docsclausebyclausetoassurethateverythingthat'sbeenaddedinthepasttwoyearsisinyourdraft.
Pleasealwaysgotoourwebpageanddownloadthelatesttemplate.CurrentlythelatestRFPwasreleased4.June.
tks!...hmv
From:LoriEllis
Sent:June22,20151:02PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
Mike,
As requested Please see attached RFP for 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West.
Please confirm when received and provide me with a time-line for follow-up Thanks.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
From:LoriEllis
Sent:June08159:01AM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart;AlexMut
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Mike,
52
PFR
55
GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!
AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.
Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention
YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.
Thanksagain,
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv
53
PFR
56
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
July-06-15 9:55 AM
Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West - UPDATED RFP template and
attachments
HBayPark-EW RFP-rev_6Jul2015.docx
HiLori,
IamsorrythatIupsetMike.IdidnotknowwhichpartsoftheRFPhewasgoingtomodifyandwhichpartswereupto
us.
FYIheiswrong,thedocumentIsentwasbasedonthemostrecenttemplate.TherearenodefinitionsmissingandI
removedthePanAmclausebecausePanAmwillbeoverbythetimethisgoesout.Iwillputitbacksothathecan
removeit.
Sorryaboutthecallnumber,IhavereplaceditwiththenewoneTHROUGHOUTthedocument.Ithoughthewasgoing
todothat.
Again,sorryforgettingyouonMike'swrongside.Reupdateddocumentattached.
Best,
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:July051510:28AM
To:LoriEllis
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
Hello,Lori'
Hadalookatyourdocandfindthatitisn'tthelatesttemplate:
1/themanagerislistedasDavidFerguson,who'snotbeenwiththeCityforoverayear.
2/thecallnumberdatesto2013
3/thePanAminformationwasmissing
4/Insection1,definitionsweremissing(well,oneanywayandthat'sasfarasIgot)
IcouldoverlookacoupleofthingsbutpleaseunderstandI'veunfortunatelynotthetimerightnowtogothroughthe
docsclausebyclausetoassurethateverythingthat'sbeenaddedinthepasttwoyearsisinyourdraft.
Pleasealwaysgotoourwebpageanddownloadthelatesttemplate.CurrentlythelatestRFPwasreleased4.June.
tks!...hmv
From:LoriEllis
Sent:June22,20151:02PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
54
PFR
57
Mike,
As requested Please see attached RFP for 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West.
Please confirm when received and provide me with a time-line for follow-up Thanks.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
From:LoriEllis
Sent:June08159:01AM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart;AlexMut
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Mike,
GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!
AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.
Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention
YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.
Thanksagain,
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
55
PFR
58
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv
56
PFR
59
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lori Ellis
July-08-15 5:10 PM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West - UPDATED RFP template and
attachments
Netami,
No worries. I will review this tomorrow before I send to Mike. I did not review it the last timewhy
duplicate excellent work
Can you please give me an 'anticipated' project schedule with milestone dates. Your preferred
timeline. Then I can work the PMMD timeframe into it at the front end.
Thanks,
Lori
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:July06159:55AM
To:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
HiLori,
IamsorrythatIupsetMike.IdidnotknowwhichpartsoftheRFPhewasgoingtomodifyandwhichpartswereupto
us.
FYIheiswrong,thedocumentIsentwasbasedonthemostrecenttemplate.TherearenodefinitionsmissingandI
removedthePanAmclausebecausePanAmwillbeoverbythetimethisgoesout.Iwillputitbacksothathecan
removeit.
Sorryaboutthecallnumber,IhavereplaceditwiththenewoneTHROUGHOUTthedocument.Ithoughthewasgoing
todothat.
Again,sorryforgettingyouonMike'swrongside.Reupdateddocumentattached.
Best,
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:July051510:28AM
To:LoriEllis
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
Hello,Lori'
Hadalookatyourdocandfindthatitisn'tthelatesttemplate:
1/themanagerislistedasDavidFerguson,who'snotbeenwiththeCityforoverayear.
57
PFR
60
2/thecallnumberdatesto2013
3/thePanAminformationwasmissing
4/Insection1,definitionsweremissing(well,oneanywayandthat'sasfarasIgot)
IcouldoverlookacoupleofthingsbutpleaseunderstandI'veunfortunatelynotthetimerightnowtogothroughthe
docsclausebyclausetoassurethateverythingthat'sbeenaddedinthepasttwoyearsisinyourdraft.
Pleasealwaysgotoourwebpageanddownloadthelatesttemplate.CurrentlythelatestRFPwasreleased4.June.
tks!...hmv
From:LoriEllis
Sent:June22,20151:02PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
Mike,
As requested Please see attached RFP for 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West.
Please confirm when received and provide me with a time-line for follow-up Thanks.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
From:LoriEllis
Sent:June08159:01AM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart;AlexMut
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Mike,
GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!
AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.
Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention
YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.
58
PFR
61
Thanksagain,
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv
59
PFR
62
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
September-28-15 10:39 AM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc
Iwillcallyouat11am,onceI'vegotacoffeeinhand.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September281510:34AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr02rev01.doc
Hello, Netami:
please review the attached and give me a call.
tks! . . . hmv
60
PFR
63
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
September-28-15 12:21 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc
Hopethisworks:
BiddersareadvisedthatRFP9118155046(HumberBayParkMasterPlan)willbeawardedseparatelyand
independentlyofRFP9118155070(NewPavilioninHumberBayParkEast).Whereproponentteamsortheir
membersarebiddingonbothprojects,noassumptionsshallbemadeonthesuccessoneitherorbothbids.The
deliverables,meetingsandstaffresourcesforeachprojectareindependentoftheotherandshallnotoverlap.
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September281510:42AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr02rev01.doc
Section 14(1)
Hello, Netami:
Please use this copy for our discussions, it has all the formatting tracks removed. I'll explain later.
. . . hmv
61
PFR
64
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mike Voelker
September-28-15 3:16 PM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc
Try this.
I've made a couple more comments in the questions section.
rgds . . . hmv
62
PFR
65
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
September-28-15 3:50 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01 nks.doc
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September28153:16PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr02rev01.doc
Try this.
I've made a couple more comments in the questions section.
rgds . . . hmv
63
PFR
66
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
September-28-15 4:32 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Questions re. Humber Bay Park MP and Phase 1 Implementation
1. There are two lists that state the mandatory technical services required (see pg 5 and pg 24). The
list on pg 24 includes an architect, while the list on pg 5 does not. Is an architect required?
Refer to Addendum 2, Item 2. An architect is not required.
2. Information given at the mandatory site meeting implied that that bentonite clay liner of the
pond was in good shape. Section 3.1.1.d states that a condition assessment of the liner is
required. Is an assessment of the liner required?
An assessment of the liner in sufficient detail to make an informed recommendation for the pond
system is required.
3. Section 3.4.1a states that Phase 1 will include revitalization of the ponds. Does this include
mechanical and electrical improvements recommended in the "Inventory, Condition Report &
Feasibility Study: Internal Pond-Canal System"?
ScopeofworkforPhase1willbedeterminedduringthePublicConsultationandMasterPlan
process.TheInventory,ConditionReportandFeasibilityStudyfortheInternalPondCanalSystemis
requiredaspartoftheMasterPlan.
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September28153:21PM
To:'KerrieHarvey'
Subject:9118155046Questionsre.HumberBayParkMPandPhase1Implementation
Good Afternoon, Kerrie
Thank you for your e-mail.
I have forwarded your question to the project manager for consideration and review.
We will respond to your request, either directly or through an addendum, as soon as possible.
With regards . . . Mike Voelker
From:KerrieHarvey[mailto:kharvey@planpart.ca]
Sent:September28,201511:51
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:Questionsre.HumberBayParkMPandPhase1Implementation
Hi Mike,
We have a couple of questions regarding the Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1
Implementation RFP. We understand that the deadline for questions has passed, but are hoping to get a
response since the proposal deadline has been extended to October 7th.
64
PFR
67
1. There are two lists that state the mandatory technical services required (see pg 5 and pg 24). The list on
pg 24 includes an architect, while the list on pg 5 does not. Is an architect required?
2. Information given at the mandatory site meeting implied that that bentonite clay liner of the
pond was in good shape. Section 3.1.1.d states that a condition assessment of the liner is
required. Is an assessment of the liner required?
3. Section 3.4.1a states that Phase 1 will include revitalization of the ponds. Does this include
mechanical and electrical improvements recommended in the "Inventory, Condition Report &
Feasibility Study: Internal Pond-Canal System"?
Thank you,
Kerrie Harvey
Landscape Architect
BScH, MLA, OALA
Landscape + Urban Ecology
e kharvey@planpart.ca
p 416.975.1556 ext 269
f 416.975.1580
65
PFR
68
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mike Voelker
September-29-15 8:36 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 revFINAL.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 revFINAL.doc
Hello, Netami:
Final approval requested.
tks! . . . hmv
66
PFR
69
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
September-29-15 9:29 AM
Mike Voelker
Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 revFINAL.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 revFINAL.DOC
Approved.Thankyou.
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September29158:36AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr02revFINAL.doc
Hello, Netami:
Final approval requested.
tks! . . . hmv
67
PFR
70
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
September-30-15 3:28 PM
Lori Ellis
Alma Salcedo; Brenda Duffley; Mike Voelker
RE: RFP 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation Addendum 02
PleaseseeanswerstoErinPietersma'squestionsbelowinRED:
1. WhatlevelofdetaileddesignisexpectedforPhase1DetailedDesign?Forexample,preliminarydesignsto50%
andtypicaldetailsorFinalizeddesignsto99%andfullconstructiondetails?
Thevendorisexpectedtoproduce80%designwithtypicaldetailsanddraftconstructiondetails.
2. Doesthe$15,000.00AllowanceonForm8forPhase1DetailDesignmeanthattheProponentdoesnotinclude
costingforStage5intheirproposal?
The$15,000allowanceistocoverStage4,Phase1DetailedDesignandCosting.
HelloMr.Voelker,
Belowpleasefindalistingofourquestionsfortheabovenotedforyourreviewandresponse.
1. Pleaseconfirmtheanticipatedscheduleforeachstageofwork,andspecifically:
a. AnticipatedscheduleforcompletionoftheMasterPlan;and
b. AnticipatedscheduleforpreparationofTenderDocumentsforPhase1.
PleaserefertoAddendum#2
2. Thelistingofkeystaffandmandatoryservicesdiffersonpage5versuspage24.Pleaseclarifythekeystaffand
mandatoryprofessionalandtechnicalservices.
PleaserefertoAddendum#2
3. Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforstructuralengineeringservices.
PleaserefertoAddendum#2
4. Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforthelightingdesigner.
ThelightingdesignershallpreparethelightingdesignfortheMasterPlan.
5. TheScopeofworkforPhase1DetailedDesignisidentifiedonpage13howevertheRFPstatesthatscopewill
bedeterminedthroughthepublicconsultationprocess.Isthescopeofwork,asstatedonpage13,limitedto:
revitalizationofponds,enhancementandreconfigurationandreconstructionoftheprimarywalkingtrails
withintheprecinct.?
68
PFR
71
PleaserefertoAddendum#2
6. UnderExperienceandQualificationsoftheProponent,pleaseconfirmif4projectexamplesarerequiredfor
eachsubconsultant,inadditionto4projectexamplesfortheProponentORif4projectexamplesarerequired
intotal.
a. If4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal,canthe4projectexamplesbecomprisedofexamplesfrom
boththeProponentandsubconsultants?
Projectexamplesshallreflecttheexperienceandqualificationsoftheleadconsultant.
7. AretheLetterofIntroduction,TableofContentsandExecutiveSummaryincludedinthepagelimit?
No.
8. HasanEnvironmentalAssessmentbeencompletedfortheHumberBayparkland?
a. DoestheCityanticipatethananEnvironmentalAssessmentwillneedtobecompleted?Ifso,willthe
Cityberesponsibleforitscompletion?
AnEnvironmentalAssessmenthasnotbeencompletedandwillnotberequired.
9. WilltheCityconsiderprovidinganextensionontheRFPclosingdate?
PleaserefertoAddendum#1
10. WilltheCityconsiderproposalsthatexceedthepreferred24pagelimit?
No.
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
69
PFR
72
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mike Voelker
October-01-15 11:02 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Add Nr03 rev01.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev01.doc
Netami:
Please review and advise.
. . . hmv
70
PFR
73
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
October-01-15 11:30 AM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Add Nr03 rev01.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev01 nks.doc
Pleaseseemecomments.Otherwiseit'sgreat.
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:October011511:02AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr03rev01.doc
Netami:
Please review and advise.
. . . hmv
71
PFR
74
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mike Voelker
October-01-15 11:42 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev02.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev02.doc
Netami:
One last change to the doc. you'd addressed the issue in two of the three instances where it occurred, but Q1 was left
untouched. Please approve or modify at will.
rgds . . . hmv
72
PFR
75
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
October-01-15 11:43 AM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev02.doc
Approvedassent.
Regards,
nks
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:October011511:42AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr03rev02.doc
Netami:
One last change to the doc. you'd addressed the issue in two of the three instances where it occurred, but Q1 was left
untouched. Please approve or modify at will.
rgds . . . hmv
73
PFR
76
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
October-01-15 2:09 PM
Netami Stuart
FW: RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 3.pdf
Netami,
For you
Lori
From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:October01151:51PM
To:LoriEllis
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RFPNO.9118155046
74
PFR
77
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
October-01-15 3:27 PM
'Jeremy Craig'
Victor Ford
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park master plan
GoodAfternoon,Jeremy;
Thankyouforyouremail.
Ihaveforwardedyourrequesttotheprojectmanagerforconsiderationandreview.
Wewillrespondtoyourrequest,eitherdirectlyorthroughanaddendum,assoonaspossible.
Pleasenote,thatunlessotherwiseadvisedthroughanaddendum,theclosingdatewillremainunchanged.
Withregards...MikeVoelker
MikeVoelker,CSCMP
SeniorCorporateBuyer
ConstructionServices,PurchasingandMaterialsManagementCityofToronto19thFloor,WestTower,CityHall
100QueenStreetWest,
Toronto,OntarioM5H2N2
mvoelke@toronto.ca
(416)3380487
OriginalMessage
From:JeremyCraig[mailto:jeremy@victorford.ca]
Sent:October1,201515:16
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:VictorFord
Subject:Re:CityofTorontoCallDocument#9118155046Addendum
GoodafternoonMike,
I'vehadaquickscanoftoday'saddendumandnotedthatarequestforafurtherextensionwassubmittedandturned
down.
Iamwritingtorequestthatthecityreconsiderthis,andofferafurtherextension.Thechangesinaddendum2were
quitesignificantwithregardtotheproposals.
Thankyouforconsideringthisrequest.
JeremyCraig
VictorFordandAssociatesInc
SentusingOWAforiPhone
75
PFR
78
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
October-02-15 9:03 AM
Lori Ellis
Fw: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park master plan
Moretime?Whatdoyouthink?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
OriginalMessage
From:MikeVoelker<mvoelke@toronto.ca>
Sent:Thursday,October1,20153:26PM
To:'JeremyCraig'
Cc:VictorFord
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkmasterplan
GoodAfternoon,Jeremy;
Thankyouforyouremail.
Ihaveforwardedyourrequesttotheprojectmanagerforconsiderationandreview.
Wewillrespondtoyourrequest,eitherdirectlyorthroughanaddendum,assoonaspossible.
Pleasenote,thatunlessotherwiseadvisedthroughanaddendum,theclosingdatewillremainunchanged.
Withregards...MikeVoelker
MikeVoelker,CSCMP
SeniorCorporateBuyer
ConstructionServices,PurchasingandMaterialsManagementCityofToronto19thFloor,WestTower,CityHall
100QueenStreetWest,
Toronto,OntarioM5H2N2
mvoelke@toronto.ca
(416)3380487
OriginalMessage
From:JeremyCraig[mailto:jeremy@victorford.ca]
Sent:October1,201515:16
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:VictorFord
Subject:Re:CityofTorontoCallDocument#9118155046Addendum
GoodafternoonMike,
76
PFR
79
I'vehadaquickscanoftoday'saddendumandnotedthatarequestforafurtherextensionwassubmittedandturned
down.
Iamwritingtorequestthatthecityreconsiderthis,andofferafurtherextension.Thechangesinaddendum2were
quitesignificantwithregardtotheproposals.
Thankyouforconsideringthisrequest.
JeremyCraig
VictorFordandAssociatesInc
SentusingOWAforiPhone
77
PFR
80
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
October-05-15 7:02 AM
'Erin Pietersma'
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation Addendum 03
From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:October2,201516:15
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03
HelloMike,
Asdiscussed,belowpleasefindmyformalizedquestionregardingAddendum03foryourreviewandresponse.
1. OurquestionQ4.wastryingtoascertainifthe$15KallowanceforPhase1DetailedDesignindicated
thattheProponentisnotrequiredtoincludepricingforthisstageintheirproposal.Thisisafollowup
clarificationtoconfirmifthisisthecaseandifthe$15KallocatedforPhase1DetailedDesignis(1)a
fixedamount;or(2)abestguessassignedbytheCity.Basedonourunderstanding,detaileddesign
wouldtypicallyrepresentapproximately40%oftheoverallbudget.
2. Basedontheallowanceof$15KforPhase1DetailedDesign,pleaseconfirmifthebudgetfortheMaster
Planis$310,000$360,000.
Thankyou,
Erin
PFR
81
From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:September29,201517:26
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:RFP9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum
02
HelloMike,
FollowinguponAddendum02,canyoupleaseprovideclarificationonthefollowing:
1. WhatlevelofdetaileddesignisexpectedforPhase1DetailedDesign?Forexample,preliminary
designsto50%andtypicaldetailsorFinalizeddesignsto99%andfullconstructiondetails?
2.
Doesthe$15,000.00AllowanceonForm8forPhase1DetailDesignmeanthattheProponent
doesnotincludecostingforStage5intheirproposal?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
Erin
GoodmorningMike,
CanyoupleaseconfirmifyouwillbeissuinganAddendumfortheabovenotedtoday?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
Erin
PFR
82
HelloMr.Voelker,
Belowpleasefindalistingofourquestionsfortheabovenotedforyourreviewandresponse.
1. Pleaseconfirmtheanticipatedscheduleforeachstageofwork,andspecifically:
a.
AnticipatedscheduleforcompletionoftheMasterPlan;and
b. AnticipatedscheduleforpreparationofTenderDocumentsforPhase1.
2.
Thelistingofkeystaffandmandatoryservicesdiffersonpage5versuspage24.Pleaseclarify
thekeystaffandmandatoryprofessionalandtechnicalservices.
3.
Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforstructuralengineeringservices.
4.
Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforthelightingdesigner.
5.
TheScopeofworkforPhase1DetailedDesignisidentifiedonpage13howevertheRFPstates
thatscopewillbedeterminedthroughthepublicconsultationprocess.Isthescopeofwork,as
statedonpage13,limitedto:revitalizationofponds,enhancementandreconfigurationand
reconstructionoftheprimarywalkingtrailswithintheprecinct.?
6.
UnderExperienceandQualificationsoftheProponent,pleaseconfirmif4projectexamplesare
requiredforeachsubconsultant,inadditionto4projectexamplesfortheProponentORif4
projectexamplesarerequiredintotal.
a.
If4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal,canthe4projectexamplesbecomprisedof
examplesfromboththeProponentandsubconsultants?
7.
AretheLetterofIntroduction,TableofContentsandExecutiveSummaryincludedinthepage
limit?
8.
HasanEnvironmentalAssessmentbeencompletedfortheHumberBayparkland?
a.
9.
DoestheCityanticipatethananEnvironmentalAssessmentwillneedtobe
completed?Ifso,willtheCityberesponsibleforitscompletion?
WilltheCityconsiderprovidinganextensionontheRFPclosingdate?
10. WilltheCityconsiderproposalsthatexceedthepreferred24pagelimit?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
80
PFR
83
81
PFR
84
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
October-05-15 12:01 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation Addendum 03
WearewillingtoextendthedeadlinetoOctober14th,givenJeremy'srequest.
InanswertoErin'squestionsbelow:
1. OurquestionQ4.wastryingtoascertainifthe$15KallowanceforPhase1DetailedDesignindicated
thattheProponentisnotrequiredtoincludepricingforthisstageintheirproposal.Thisisafollowup
clarificationtoconfirmifthisisthecaseandifthe$15KallocatedforPhase1DetailedDesignis(1)a
fixedamount;or(2)abestguessassignedbytheCity.Basedonourunderstanding,detaileddesign
wouldtypicallyrepresentapproximately40%oftheoverallbudget.
TheCityhasassignedanallowancevalueof$15KfortheDetailDesignofPhase1.Thiswasdoneinordertoremovethe
uncertaintyforproponentsofassigningacostfortheworkwhenthescopeofPhase1isnotyetdetermined.The
proponentisnotrequiredtoprovidepricingforthisportionoftheworkbeyondtheassignedallowanceof$15K.
2. Basedontheallowanceof$15KforPhase1DetailedDesign,pleaseconfirmifthebudgetfortheMaster
Planis$310,000$360,000.
ThebudgetforthescopeofworkasdescribedintheRFPis,asstated,$325,000.00to$375,000.00.Thisincludesa
$15,000allowanceforthedetaildesignofPhase1.
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:October05157:02AM
To:'ErinPietersma'
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03
From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:October2,201516:15
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03
HelloMike,
Asdiscussed,belowpleasefindmyformalizedquestionregardingAddendum03foryourreviewandresponse.
82
PFR
85
1. OurquestionQ4.wastryingtoascertainifthe$15KallowanceforPhase1DetailedDesignindicatedthatthe
Proponentisnotrequiredtoincludepricingforthisstageintheirproposal.Thisisafollowupclarificationto
confirmifthisisthecaseandifthe$15KallocatedforPhase1DetailedDesignis(1)afixedamount;or(2)a
bestguessassignedbytheCity.Basedonourunderstanding,detaileddesignwouldtypicallyrepresent
approximately40%oftheoverallbudget.
2. Basedontheallowanceof$15KforPhase1DetailedDesign,pleaseconfirmifthebudgetfortheMaster
Planis$310,000$360,000.
Thankyou,
Erin
From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:September29,201517:26
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:RFP9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum
02
HelloMike,
FollowinguponAddendum02,canyoupleaseprovideclarificationonthefollowing:
1. WhatlevelofdetaileddesignisexpectedforPhase1DetailedDesign?Forexample,preliminary
designsto50%andtypicaldetailsorFinalizeddesignsto99%andfullconstructiondetails?
83
PFR
86
2.
Doesthe$15,000.00AllowanceonForm8forPhase1DetailDesignmeanthattheProponent
doesnotincludecostingforStage5intheirproposal?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
Erin
GoodmorningMike,
CanyoupleaseconfirmifyouwillbeissuinganAddendumfortheabovenotedtoday?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
Erin
HelloMr.Voelker,
Belowpleasefindalistingofourquestionsfortheabovenotedforyourreviewandresponse.
1. Pleaseconfirmtheanticipatedscheduleforeachstageofwork,andspecifically:
a.
AnticipatedscheduleforcompletionoftheMasterPlan;and
b. AnticipatedscheduleforpreparationofTenderDocumentsforPhase1.
2.
Thelistingofkeystaffandmandatoryservicesdiffersonpage5versuspage24.Pleaseclarify
thekeystaffandmandatoryprofessionalandtechnicalservices.
3.
Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforstructuralengineeringservices.
4.
Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforthelightingdesigner.
5.
TheScopeofworkforPhase1DetailedDesignisidentifiedonpage13howevertheRFPstates
thatscopewillbedeterminedthroughthepublicconsultationprocess.Isthescopeofwork,as
statedonpage13,limitedto:revitalizationofponds,enhancementandreconfigurationand
reconstructionoftheprimarywalkingtrailswithintheprecinct.?
84
PFR
87
6.
UnderExperienceandQualificationsoftheProponent,pleaseconfirmif4projectexamplesare
requiredforeachsubconsultant,inadditionto4projectexamplesfortheProponentORif4
projectexamplesarerequiredintotal.
a.
If4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal,canthe4projectexamplesbecomprisedof
examplesfromboththeProponentandsubconsultants?
7.
AretheLetterofIntroduction,TableofContentsandExecutiveSummaryincludedinthepage
limit?
8.
HasanEnvironmentalAssessmentbeencompletedfortheHumberBayparkland?
a.
9.
DoestheCityanticipatethananEnvironmentalAssessmentwillneedtobe
completed?Ifso,willtheCityberesponsibleforitscompletion?
WilltheCityconsiderprovidinganextensionontheRFPclosingdate?
10. WilltheCityconsiderproposalsthatexceedthepreferred24pagelimit?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
85
PFR
88
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
October-05-15 1:08 PM
'Erin Pietersma'
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation Addendum 03
ThebudgetforthescopeofworkasdescribedintheRFPis,asperSection2.3(asrevisedinAddendumNo.2and
confirmedinAddendumNo.3),$325,000.00to$375,000.00.Thisincludesa$15,000allowanceforthedetaildesignof
Phase1.
ThescopeofworkfortheprojectisdescribedinAddendum2,Item6andincludesDetailDesignofPhase1.
Withregards...MikeVoelker
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:October5,201507:02
To:'ErinPietersma'
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03
From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:October2,201516:15
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03
HelloMike,
Asdiscussed,belowpleasefindmyformalizedquestionregardingAddendum03foryourreviewand
response.
1. OurquestionQ4.wastryingtoascertainifthe$15KallowanceforPhase1DetailedDesign
indicatedthattheProponentisnotrequiredtoincludepricingforthisstageintheirproposal.
Thisisafollowupclarificationtoconfirmifthisisthecaseandifthe$15KallocatedforPhase1
DetailedDesignis(1)afixedamount;or(2)abestguessassignedbytheCity.Basedonour
understanding,detaileddesignwouldtypicallyrepresentapproximately40%oftheoverall
budget.
86
PFR
89
2. Basedontheallowanceof$15KforPhase1DetailedDesign,pleaseconfirmifthebudgetfor
theMasterPlanis$310,000$360,000.
Thankyou,
Erin
From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:September29,201517:26
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:RFP9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1Implementation
Addendum02
HelloMike,
FollowinguponAddendum02,canyoupleaseprovideclarificationonthefollowing:
1. WhatlevelofdetaileddesignisexpectedforPhase1DetailedDesign?Forexample,
preliminarydesignsto50%andtypicaldetailsorFinalizeddesignsto99%andfull
constructiondetails?
2.
Doesthe$15,000.00AllowanceonForm8forPhase1DetailDesignmeanthatthe
ProponentdoesnotincludecostingforStage5intheirproposal?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
87
PFR
90
Erin
GoodmorningMike,
CanyoupleaseconfirmifyouwillbeissuinganAddendumfortheabovenotedtoday?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
Erin
HelloMr.Voelker,
Belowpleasefindalistingofourquestionsfortheabovenotedforyourreviewandresponse.
1. Pleaseconfirmtheanticipatedscheduleforeachstageofwork,andspecifically:
a.
AnticipatedscheduleforcompletionoftheMasterPlan;and
b. AnticipatedscheduleforpreparationofTenderDocumentsforPhase1.
2.
Thelistingofkeystaffandmandatoryservicesdiffersonpage5versuspage24.Please
clarifythekeystaffandmandatoryprofessionalandtechnicalservices.
3.
Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforstructuralengineeringservices.
4.
Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforthelightingdesigner.
5.
TheScopeofworkforPhase1DetailedDesignisidentifiedonpage13howeverthe
RFPstatesthatscopewillbedeterminedthroughthepublicconsultationprocess.Isthe
scopeofwork,asstatedonpage13,limitedto:revitalizationofponds,enhancement
andreconfigurationandreconstructionoftheprimarywalkingtrailswithinthe
precinct.?
6.
UnderExperienceandQualificationsoftheProponent,pleaseconfirmif4project
examplesarerequiredforeachsubconsultant,inadditionto4projectexamplesforthe
ProponentORif4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal.
a.
If4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal,canthe4projectexamplesbe
comprisedofexamplesfromboththeProponentandsubconsultants?
88
PFR
91
7.
AretheLetterofIntroduction,TableofContentsandExecutiveSummaryincludedin
thepagelimit?
8.
HasanEnvironmentalAssessmentbeencompletedfortheHumberBayparkland?
a.
9.
DoestheCityanticipatethananEnvironmentalAssessmentwillneedtobe
completed?Ifso,willtheCityberesponsibleforitscompletion?
WilltheCityconsiderprovidinganextensionontheRFPclosingdate?
10. WilltheCityconsiderproposalsthatexceedthepreferred24pagelimit?
Thankyou.
Sincerely,
89
PFR
92
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
October-09-15 2:00 PM
Mike Voelker
9118-15-5046
HiMike,
Itrustwereceivedatleastthreebids.I*hope*wereceivedatleastthree.
Iwonderifyoucouldsendmethe.pdfcopiesofAddenda#1and#2.Ihavethewordversions,howevertheTRCA
wouldlikethefullofficialPDFofthecall.IhaveAddendum#3.
Also,I'llbehappytopickthesubmissionsupwheneverthey'reready.
Haveaniceweekend,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
90
PFR
93
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
October-09-15 2:01 PM
Netami Stuart
Suzanne Bloomfield
9118-15-5046 - submissions status
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October9,201514:00
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046
HiMike,
Itrustwereceivedatleastthreebids.I*hope*wereceivedatleastthree.
Iwonderifyoucouldsendmethe.pdfcopiesofAddenda#1and#2.Ihavethewordversions,howeverthe
TRCAwouldlikethefullofficialPDFofthecall.IhaveAddendum#3.
Also,I'llbehappytopickthesubmissionsupwheneverthey'reready.
Haveaniceweekend,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
91
PFR
94
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
October-09-15 2:06 PM
'Nancy Gaffney'; Lori Ellis
RE: Humber Bay Ponds and general HB East and West info
9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 3.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Client Copy.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Add
Nr02 revFINAL.doc; 9118-15-5046 - Add Nr.01 rev00.doc
HiNancy,
Ihaven'theardfrompurchasingyet,andIwillletyouknowwhenwe'vegotasuccessfulbidder.HerearetheRFPand
Addenda.Wetookconstructionoutofthebudget,asyou'llnoteinAddendum#2.
Cheers,
N
From:NancyGaffney[mailto:NGaffney@trca.on.ca]
Sent:October08155:10PM
To:NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:Fw:HumberBayPondsandgeneralHBEastandWestinfo
Hello
We have been compiling alot of information to give to your consultants. I have a pile at my desk already. Yell when you
are ready.
Can one of you please send me the RFP and the Addendum?
Thank you
Nancy
Nancy Gaffney BSc | Waterfront Specialist | Watershed Management Division | Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority |5 Shoreham Dr., Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 | 416.661.6600, ext. 5313 | 416.667.6278 | * ngaffney@trca.on.ca
Hello,
We have lots of data from the Humber Bay area including;
Fisheries data going back to 1988
Bacteria samples from the hobby boat ponds
Temperature data since 2007
Sediment data since 2008 (Can go back further with hard copies)
Mussel tissue samples since 2008 (Can go back further with hard copies)
92
PFR
95
This data is from the Humber Bay to Mimico Linear Park area. Let me know what your interested in.
Brian Graham
Environmental Monitoring Technician
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
Tel: (416) 661-6600 ext: 5637 Cell: (416) 991-3751
Fax: (416) 667-6277
E-mail: bgraham@trca.on.ca
www.trca.on.ca
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."
93
PFR
96
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Suzanne Bloomfield
October-09-15 2:10 PM
Netami Stuart
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - submissions status
9118-15-5046.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 1.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Addendum No.
2.pdf
Hi Netami,
Please see the attached.
Suzanne
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,October09,20152:01PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046submissionsstatus
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October9,201514:00
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046
HiMike,
Itrustwereceivedatleastthreebids.I*hope*wereceivedatleastthree.
Iwonderifyoucouldsendmethe.pdfcopiesofAddenda#1and#2.Ihavethewordversions,howeverthe
TRCAwouldlikethefullofficialPDFofthecall.IhaveAddendum#3.
Also,I'llbehappytopickthesubmissionsupwheneverthey'reready.
Haveaniceweekend,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
94
PFR
97
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
October-15-15 12:51 PM
Netami Stuart
Susan Korrick
Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
Humber Bay Park RFP-9118-15-5046- Ltr from PMMD.pdf
Netami,
Attached here is a letter from purchasing regarding Humber Bay Park RFPNO. 9118-15-5046
I picked the box up from purchasing on the 14th
7 firms submitted
I have not reviewed the submissions.
We can mobilize on this when you are back tomorrow.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
95
PFR
98
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
October-15-15 3:43 PM
Lori Ellis
RE: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
s. 14(1)
Hithere,
Whataday!Oklet'stalkonthephone.Iamoutofmydesk,socallmycell,
ormybbat6474732137.
Isuggestthatyou,me,Katy,Peter(ifhe'sinvitingoneofustohisreviewteam)andmaybeanengineerorDavenosella
shouldlookatthis?
Seeyoutomorrow.
From:LoriEllis
Sent:October151512:51PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:SusanKorrick
Subject:HumberBayParkRFPNO.9118155046
Netami,
Attached here is a letter from purchasing regarding Humber Bay Park RFPNO. 9118-15-5046
I picked the box up from purchasing on the 14th
7 firms submitted
I have not reviewed the submissions.
We can mobilize on this when you are back tomorrow.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
96
PFR
99
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lori Ellis
October-15-15 4:40 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
s. 14(1)
Netami,
Iwillcalltalktoyoutomorrow.
Lori
From: Netami Stuart
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 03:42 PM
To: Lori Ellis
Subject: RE: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
s. 14(1)
Hithere,
Whataday!Oklet'stalkonthephone.Iamoutofmydesk,socallmycell,
ormybbat6474732137.
Isuggestthatyou,me,Katy,Peter(ifhe'sinvitingoneofustohisreviewteam)andmaybeanengineerorDavenosella
shouldlookatthis?
Seeyoutomorrow.
From:LoriEllis
Sent:October151512:51PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:SusanKorrick
Subject:HumberBayParkRFPNO.9118155046
Netami,
Attached here is a letter from purchasing regarding Humber Bay Park RFPNO. 9118-15-5046
I picked the box up from purchasing on the 14th
7 firms submitted
I have not reviewed the submissions.
We can mobilize on this when you are back tomorrow.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
97
PFR
100
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
October-16-15 9:23 AM
Lori Ellis
RE: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
s. 14(1)
Hithere,
I'llhappilyinvitepeopletobeonour
selectioncommitteebutIjustwanttoknowwhoyouthinkitshouldbe.DidyoutalktoPeter?
I'matmydesksopleasecallifyou'reuptoit.
Netami
From:LoriEllis
Sent:October15154:40PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:HumberBayParkRFPNO.9118155046
Netami,
.
Iwillcalltalktoyoutomorrow.
Lori
From: Netami Stuart
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 03:42 PM
To: Lori Ellis
Subject: RE: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
Hithere,
Whataday!Oklet'stalkonthephone.Iamoutofmydesk,socallmycell,
ormybbat6474732137.
Isuggestthatyou,me,Katy,Peter(ifhe'sinvitingoneofustohisreviewteam)andmaybeanengineerorDavenosella
shouldlookatthis?
Seeyoutomorrow.
From:LoriEllis
Sent:October151512:51PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:SusanKorrick
Subject:HumberBayParkRFPNO.9118155046
Netami,
98
PFR
101
Attached here is a letter from purchasing regarding Humber Bay Park RFPNO. 9118-15-5046
I picked the box up from purchasing on the 14th
7 firms submitted
I have not reviewed the submissions.
We can mobilize on this when you are back tomorrow.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483
99
PFR
102
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
October-16-15 2:55 PM
Katy Aminian
Ruthanne Henry
Humber Bay RFP & Addenda
9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 2.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 3.pdf;
9118-15-5046 Client Copy.pdf
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
100
PFR
103
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
October-22-15 12:15 PM
Katy Aminian
RE: try again
9118-15-5046 Client Copy.pdf
Pleaseseeattached
From:KatyAminian
Sent:October221511:06AM
To:NetamiStuart;PeterKlambauer;LoriEllis;RuthanneHenry
Subject:Re:tryagain
IamOKwithanyofthosedays.CouldyoupleaseresendmeacopyoftheRFP?
Thanks,
From: Netami Stuart
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:16 AM
To: Katy Aminian; Peter Klambauer; Lori Ellis; Ruthanne Henry
Subject: try again
Hieveryone,
ItsoundslikeNovember2ad3rdareout.PleaseletmeknowyouravailabilityforNov.4,5and6.
Thanks,
N
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
101
PFR
104
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Nicholas Sovranl
October-22-15 1:30 PM
Netami Stuart
RE:
Copy of Proponent Evaluation (3).xlsx
HelloNetami,
UnfortunatelyIwasunabletoconnectapathtoautomaticallychangedatasimilartodatainanotherspreadsheet.
Therearesomeformulasyoucanusebutyouneedthedatainthecell.Also,theprocessIfoundshowsinsertingthe
formulaoneatatimeineachcell.Letmeknowwhatyouthink!
Thankyou,
NicholasS
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October221510:13AM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:
Hereyougo!
SeeifyoucanmakeitsothatIcanenterdataintoEITHERthetotalssheetORtheindividualfirmsheets.
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
102
PFR
105
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Nicholas Sovranl
October-29-15 10:57 AM
Netami Stuart
RE:
Copy of Proponent Evaluation.xlsx
GoodmorningNetami,
IhavecompletedthespreadsheetandIhavedoublecheckedtomakesureallthecellsmatchthetotalonewitheachof
thecorrespondingcellsoneachseparatesheet.However,youcanonlychangetheinformationinthecellsfromthe
totalsheetsandnottheotherway.AlsoIamhavingaproblemwiththeaverageforthetotalofeachindividual'sscore
forVictorFord&AssociatesInc.,Ihavehighlightedthecell.Enjoyyourweekend!
NicholasSovran
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October23152:25PM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:RE:
ThanksNicholas,that'smostexcellent!IaminEtobicoketodaysoseeyounextweek.
Haveagoodweekend,
N
From:NicholasSovranl
Sent:October22155:11PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:
HelloNetami,
Iwellhavethespreadsheetcompletedbynextweek,Iamalmosthalfwaythrough.Ihaveattachedseveralparkswithin
themeasurements.Enjoy!
NicholasS
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October221510:13AM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:
Hereyougo!
SeeifyoucanmakeitsothatIcanenterdataintoEITHERthetotalssheetORtheindividualfirmsheets.
103
PFR
106
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
104
PFR
107
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Nicholas Sovranl
October-29-15 1:40 PM
Netami Stuart
RE:
Copy of Proponent Evaluation.xlsx
Iwasabletofixmyformulaerror.Iamresendingthespreadsheetsoignoremyfirstemail.
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October23152:25PM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:RE:
ThanksNicholas,that'smostexcellent!IaminEtobicoketodaysoseeyounextweek.
Haveagoodweekend,
N
From:NicholasSovranl
Sent:October22155:11PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:
HelloNetami,
Iwellhavethespreadsheetcompletedbynextweek,Iamalmosthalfwaythrough.Ihaveattachedseveralparkswithin
themeasurements.Enjoy!
NicholasS
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October221510:13AM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:
Hereyougo!
SeeifyoucanmakeitsothatIcanenterdataintoEITHERthetotalssheetORtheindividualfirmsheets.
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
105
PFR
108
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
October-29-15 2:54 PM
Peter Klambauer; Katy Aminian; Ruthanne Henry; Lori Ellis
Proposal Evaluation spreadsheet
Proponent Evaluation Table.xlsx
Higuys,pleaseusethisifyoufindithelpful.Ifyouputyourtotalsintothespreadsheet"Totals"tab,itwillpopulatethe
printableevaluationsheetsforeachfirm.
Cheers,
N
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
106
PFR
109
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Ruthanne Henry
November-04-15 9:36 AM
Netami Stuart
RE: Proposal Evaluation spreadsheet
Rhenry Insert Proponent Evaluation Table.xlsx
Hi Netami, here are my scores. I think Planning Partnership has strongest overall proposal, with
DTAH and Ramboll/Fotenn also very strong.
VFA, STLAi are solid but not quite with comparable experience on this type of project.
s. 7(1)
Ruthanne
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October29152:54PM
To:PeterKlambauer;KatyAminian;RuthanneHenry;LoriEllis
Subject:ProposalEvaluationspreadsheet
Higuys,pleaseusethisifyoufindithelpful.Ifyouputyourtotalsintothespreadsheet"Totals"tab,itwillpopulatethe
printableevaluationsheetsforeachfirm.
Cheers,
N
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
107
PFR
110
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Ruthanne Henry
November-04-15 5:50 PM
Netami Stuart
FW: Proposal Evaluation spreadsheet
Rhenry Insert Proponent Evaluation Table November 5.xlsx
Hi Netami, I have left the evaluation form on your desk face down and modified my scores to be
consistent with the form from the RFP. I need to sign the conflict of interest form again as I have
misplaced my copy.
Ruthanne
From:RuthanneHenry
Sent:November04159:36AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:ProposalEvaluationspreadsheet
Hi Netami, here are my scores. I think Planning Partnership has strongest overall proposal, with
DTAH and Ramboll/Fotenn also very strong.
VFA, STLAi are solid but not quite with comparable experience on this type of project.
s. 7(1)
Ruthanne
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October29152:54PM
To:PeterKlambauer;KatyAminian;RuthanneHenry;LoriEllis
Subject:ProposalEvaluationspreadsheet
Higuys,pleaseusethisifyoufindithelpful.Ifyouputyourtotalsintothespreadsheet"Totals"tab,itwillpopulatethe
printableevaluationsheetsforeachfirm.
Cheers,
N
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
108
PFR
111
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
November-05-15 3:16 PM
Ruthanne Henry; Katy Aminian; Lori Ellis; Peter Klambauer
Evaluation Forms
Proponent Evaluation Table_5nov2015.pdf; Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Katy.pdf;
Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Lori.pdf; Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Peter.pdf;
Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Ruthanne.pdf
Higuys,
Foryoureaseandcomfort,Ihaveinputthescoreswereviewedanddiscussedatourmeetingandonthetelephoneinto
handysheetsthatyoucansign,scanandsendbacktome.Pleaseseeattached.Also,pleaseseeacopyofthemaster
spreadsheetthatshowsourcalculations.Couldyoutakeaquicklooktocheckthatthenumbersonthesheetsyou're
signingmatchthenumbersonthemasterlist?Ifyounoticediscrepanciesorerrors,pleaseletmeknow!
IwillsubmittoPurchasingtomorrowafterdiscussingwithSusanKorrick.
Thanks,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
109
PFR
112
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
November-05-15 3:55 PM
Ruthanne Henry; Katy Aminian; Lori Ellis; Peter Klambauer
PLEASE USE THESE ONES! RE: Evaluation Forms
Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Katy.pdf; Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Lori.pdf;
Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Peter.pdf; Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Ruthanne.pdf;
Proponent Evaluation Table2_5nov2015.pdf
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November05153:16PM
To:RuthanneHenry;KatyAminian;LoriEllis;PeterKlambauer
Subject:EvaluationForms
Higuys,
Foryoureaseandcomfort,Ihaveinputthescoreswereviewedanddiscussedatourmeetingandonthetelephoneinto
handysheetsthatyoucansign,scanandsendbacktome.Pleaseseeattached.Also,pleaseseeacopyofthemaster
spreadsheetthatshowsourcalculations.Couldyoutakeaquicklooktocheckthatthenumbersonthesheetsyou're
signingmatchthenumbersonthemasterlist?Ifyounoticediscrepanciesorerrors,pleaseletmeknow!
IwillsubmittoPurchasingtomorrowafterdiscussingwithSusanKorrick.
Thanks,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
110
PFR
113
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
November-20-15 11:41 AM
Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis; Susan Korrick; Dave Nosella; Suzanne Bloomfield
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
111
PFR
114
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
November-20-15 12:02 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
9118-15-5046_Proponent Evaluation Table.xlsx
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'sof
theevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
112
PFR
115
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Suzanne Bloomfield
November-20-15 12:45 PM
Netami Stuart
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hi Netami,
The cost of services package is ready for pick up.
Suzanne
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,November20,201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
113
PFR
116
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
November-20-15 12:46 PM
Suzanne Bloomfield
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
HiSuzanne,
Whereisyouroffice?AtCityHall?Whatistheprocedureforopeningtheenvelopes?
Thanks,
netami
From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:November201512:45PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hi Netami,
The cost of services package is ready for pick up.
Suzanne
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,November20,201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
114
PFR
117
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
115
PFR
118
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Suzanne Bloomfield
November-20-15 12:49 PM
Netami Stuart
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hi Netami,
I am at City Hall, 19th Floor, West Tower. I am not sure about the procedure on opening the
envelopes, you will have to speak with Mike V.
Suzanne
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:Friday,November20,201512:46PM
To:SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiSuzanne,
Whereisyouroffice?AtCityHall?Whatistheprocedureforopeningtheenvelopes?
Thanks,
netami
From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:November201512:45PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hi Netami,
The cost of services package is ready for pick up.
Suzanne
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,November20,201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
116
PFR
119
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
117
PFR
120
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
November-20-15 2:15 PM
Netami Stuart
Suzanne Bloomfield
9118-15-5046 - Cost of Services envelope
Hello, Netami:
the envelopes have been opened and checked.
We keep the originals, you get the copies.
those copies are, as mentioned by Suzanne, ready for pick-up.
rgds . . . hmv
From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:November20,201512:49
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hi Netami,
I am at City Hall, 19th Floor, West Tower. I am not sure about the procedure on opening the
envelopes, you will have to speak with Mike V.
Suzanne
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:Friday,November20,201512:46PM
To:SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiSuzanne,
Whereisyouroffice?AtCityHall?Whatistheprocedureforopeningtheenvelopes?
Thanks,
netami
From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:November201512:45PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hi Netami,
The cost of services package is ready for pick up.
Suzanne
118
PFR
121
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,November20,201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne
will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsof
thefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
119
PFR
122
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
November-20-15 2:44 PM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one where they rated
the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovideyouwith
pdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne
will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsof
thefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
120
PFR
123
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
121
PFR
124
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
November-20-15 4:17 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Evaluation Sheets_Katy.pdf; Evaluation Sheets_Netami.pdf; Evaluation Sheets_Peter.pdf;
Evaluation Sheets_Ruthanne.pdf; Humber Bay Park RFP Review -LEllis.pdf
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredtheproponentsonthe
weightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one where they rated
the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovideyouwith
pdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne
will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
122
PFR
125
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsof
thefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
123
PFR
126
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
November-23-15 7:50 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredtheproponentson
theweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe
05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one where they
rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovide
youwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
124
PFR
127
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today.
Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosure
formsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
125
PFR
128
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
November-23-15 4:32 PM
Mike Voelker
Lori Ellis; Susan Korrick
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthescores
willbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyouwith
adjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredtheproponentson
theweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe
05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
126
PFR
129
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one where they
rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovide
youwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today.
Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosure
formsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
127
PFR
130
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
November-24-15 7:08 AM
Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis; Susan Korrick
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.
128
PFR
131
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
129
PFR
132
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
130
PFR
133
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
November-24-15 7:13 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,however
someofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetback
toyouwithadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
131
PFR
134
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescored
theproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).The
scoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the
one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
132
PFR
135
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthe
firmsevaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththe
resultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
133
PFR
136
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lori Ellis
November-24-15 7:56 AM
Netami Stuart
Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
GoodMorning:)
IaninECCtoday.
Iwilldothescoresthisamandsendbeforenoon.
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,20154:08AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
134
PFR
137
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
135
PFR
138
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
136
PFR
139
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
November-24-15 9:29 AM
Lori Ellis
Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Iamoutthismorningbutwouldliketodiscusswithyouverybrieflybeforeyouspendtime.
CanIcallyouonyourcell?Whatisthenumber?
N
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Lori Ellis
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:56 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Subject: Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
GoodMorning:)
IaninECCtoday.
Iwilldothescoresthisamandsendbeforenoon.
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,20154:08AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
137
PFR
140
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
138
PFR
141
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
139
PFR
142
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lori Ellis
November-24-15 9:37 AM
Netami Stuart
Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
4164205825
Iamoutthismorningbutwouldliketodiscusswithyouverybrieflybeforeyouspendtime.
CanIcallyouonyourcell?Whatisthenumber?
N
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Lori Ellis
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:56 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Subject: Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
GoodMorning:)
IaninECCtoday.
Iwilldothescoresthisamandsendbeforenoon.
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,20154:08AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
140
PFR
143
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
141
PFR
144
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
142
PFR
145
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lori Ellis
November-24-15 12:39 PM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November24159:29AM
To:LoriEllis
Subject:Re:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Iamoutthismorningbutwouldliketodiscusswithyouverybrieflybeforeyouspendtime.
CanIcallyouonyourcell?Whatisthenumber?
N
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Lori Ellis
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:56 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Subject: Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
GoodMorning:)
IaninECCtoday.
Iwilldothescoresthisamandsendbeforenoon.
Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,20154:08AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
143
PFR
146
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
144
PFR
147
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
145
PFR
148
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
November-25-15 9:54 AM
Mike Voelker
Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
9118-15-5046_Proponent Evaluation Table_rev1-5.xlsx
HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoringwiththe
evaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.TheresultsattachedvaryslightlyfromtheoriginalsI
sentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,theoveralloutcomeremainsthe
same,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthesameorderofpointsawarded.
Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscoresheetsupon
request.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,however
someofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
146
PFR
149
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetback
toyouwithadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescored
theproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).The
scoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the
one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
147
PFR
150
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
148
PFR
151
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
November-25-15 10:04 AM
Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hello, Netami
Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.
And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.
Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
149
PFR
152
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
150
PFR
153
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomething
moreraw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing
should be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthe
firmsevaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththe
resultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
151
PFR
154
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
November-25-15 11:26 AM
Mike Voelker
Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
OkI'mhereonthe19th.Thanks!
Netami
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:03 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Cc: Lori Ellis
Subject: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hello, Netami
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.
Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
152
PFR
155
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
153
PFR
156
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomething
moreraw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing
should be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthe
firmsevaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththe
resultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
154
PFR
157
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
155
PFR
158
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
November-25-15 12:19 PM
Mike Voelker
Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hello,
DanielMcLaughlinhanddeliveredthepricesthismorning.Iwillbebacktoyouwiththeresultstomorrow.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November251510:04AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami
Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.
And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.
Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
156
PFR
159
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
157
PFR
160
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
158
PFR
161
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
159
PFR
162
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
November-26-15 2:30 PM
Mike Voelker
Susan Korrick; Dave Nosella; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results including Prices
9118-15-5046_Humber Bay MP_LA Recommendation.pdf; 9118-15-5046_Proponent
Evaluation Table_prices.xlsx
DearMike,
Pleasefindattachedarecommendationletterforthisproject.Letmeknowifyouneedanythingelse.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November251510:04AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami
Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.
And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.
Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.
Regards,
Netami
160
PFR
163
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
161
PFR
164
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
162
PFR
165
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
163
PFR
166
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Susan Korrick
November-26-15 4:22 PM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results including Prices
Thanks Netami
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November26152:30PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResultsincludingPrices
DearMike,
Pleasefindattachedarecommendationletterforthisproject.Letmeknowifyouneedanythingelse.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November251510:04AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami
Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.
And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.
164
PFR
167
Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
N
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
165
PFR
168
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.
BestRegards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.
Regards,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
166
PFR
169
HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.
Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
BestRegards,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
167
PFR
170
s. 12
168
PFR
171
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
December-15-15 4:32 PM
Mike Voelker
Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
169
PFR
172
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
December-16-15 7:13 AM
Netami Stuart
Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it, you are
missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
170
PFR
173
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Peter Klambauer
December-16-15 7:36 AM
Mike Voelker; Netami Stuart
Re: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:12 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Cc: Peter Klambauer
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it, you are
missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
171
PFR
174
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
December-16-15 7:38 AM
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it,
you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or tomorrow.
. . . hmv
172
PFR
175
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
173
PFR
176
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Peter Klambauer
December-16-15 8:50 AM
Mike Voelker; Netami Stuart
Dave Nosella
Re: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwasmeantfor
Pavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:37 AM
To: Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
174
PFR
177
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it,
you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or tomorrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
175
PFR
178
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dave Nosella
December-16-15 8:58 AM
Peter Klambauer; Mike Voelker; Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was thinking of
the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can proceed to BC while
the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwasmeantfor
Pavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:37 AM
To: Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
176
PFR
179
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it,
you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or tomorrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
177
PFR
180
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
December-16-15 9:51 AM
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer; Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
15-5046_Humber Bay MP_LA Recommendation_16dec2015.pdf
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was thinking of
the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can proceed to BC while
the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwasmeantfor
Pavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:37 AM
To: Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
178
PFR
181
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it,
you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or tomorrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
179
PFR
182
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
180
PFR
183
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
December-16-15 2:47 PM
Netami Stuart; Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
181
PFR
184
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
182
PFR
185
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
183
PFR
186
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
December-16-15 4:00 PM
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Canyouguyshelpmeouthere?DoyouhaveaformthatIshouldfilloutretroactivelybycallingreferencesforDTAH?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16152:47PM
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
184
PFR
187
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
185
PFR
188
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
186
PFR
189
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Peter Klambauer
December-16-15 4:38 PM
Netami Stuart
Fw: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
..requisitionmeanspreq..
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker <mvoelke@toronto.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 2:46 PM
To: Netami Stuart; Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
187
PFR
190
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
188
PFR
191
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
189
PFR
192
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Peter Klambauer
December-17-15 9:19 AM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Did you contact references, was that part of measurable evaluation? If so send him a record, if not
tell him so.
PeterKlambauer,B.ArchDPA
SeniorProjectCoordinator
PFRPDCP
EtobicokeCivicCentre
399TheWestMall
MainFloor,NorthBlock
Toronto,ONM9C2Y2
Tel:4163956676
Fax:4163948935
Email:pklamba@toronto.ca
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16154:00PM
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Canyouguyshelpmeouthere?DoyouhaveaformthatIshouldfilloutretroactivelybycallingreferencesforDTAH?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16152:47PM
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
190
PFR
193
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
191
PFR
194
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
192
PFR
195
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
193
PFR
196
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
December-17-15 10:11 AM
Peter Klambauer
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Ididnotcontactanyreferences.TheRFPstatedthattheCityMAYcontactthembutnotthatwewould.
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December17159:19AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Did you contact references, was that part of measurable evaluation? If so send him a record, if not
tell him so.
PeterKlambauer,B.ArchDPA
SeniorProjectCoordinator
PFRPDCP
EtobicokeCivicCentre
399TheWestMall
MainFloor,NorthBlock
Toronto,ONM9C2Y2
Tel:4163956676
Fax:4163948935
Email:pklamba@toronto.ca
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16154:00PM
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Canyouguyshelpmeouthere?DoyouhaveaformthatIshouldfilloutretroactivelybycallingreferencesforDTAH?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16152:47PM
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
194
PFR
197
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP 195
PFR
198
timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
196
PFR
199
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
197
PFR
200
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Peter Klambauer
December-18-15 10:32 AM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Did you contact references, was that part of measurable evaluation? If so send him a record, if not
tell him so.
PeterKlambauer,B.ArchDPA
SeniorProjectCoordinator
PFRPDCP
EtobicokeCivicCentre
399TheWestMall
MainFloor,NorthBlock
Toronto,ONM9C2Y2
Tel:4163956676
Fax:4163948935
Email:pklamba@toronto.ca
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16154:00PM
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Canyouguyshelpmeouthere?DoyouhaveaformthatIshouldfilloutretroactivelybycallingreferencesforDTAH?
198
PFR
201
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16152:47PM
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
199
PFR
202
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
200
PFR
203
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
201
PFR
204
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
December-18-15 11:25 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046_references.docx
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
202
PFR
205
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
December-18-15 11:25 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046_references.docx
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
203
PFR
206
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
December-29-15 10:00 AM
Netami Stuart
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
204
PFR
207
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
205
PFR
208
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
206
PFR
209
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dave Nosella
January-03-16 11:16 AM
Kristine Yuen
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
207
PFR
210
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
208
PFR
211
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
209
PFR
212
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
210
PFR
213
s. 12
211
PFR
214
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jasmine Stein
January-04-16 10:41 AM
Netami Stuart
Automatic reply: RFP 9118-15-5046 Legal agreement required?
s. 14(1)
If you urgently require a response before this time please contact my assistant Oi Lan at 416 -338-5810
Thank you,
Jasmine
212
PFR
215
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
January-04-16 10:41 AM
Netami Stuart
Automatic reply: RFP 9118-15-5046 Legal agreement required?
s. 14(1)
213
PFR
216
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
January-04-16 12:42 PM
Mike Voelker
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
9118-15-5046_references.docx
HiagainMike,andhappyNewYear!
IhavereturnedoriginalsoftheCostofServicestoSuzanneasrequested(yousentmebothcopiessuppliedby
vendors).AttachedistherecordofhowIcontactedreferences.Ihopeitwilldo.Thereisnoformforcontacting
referencesforRFPsthatIwasabletofind.Therewerenoquestions,criteria,orscoringforreferencesmentioned
anywhereintheRFP.TheRFPstatesthattheCityofTorontomaycontactthereferencesinForm7.
Thanks,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
214
PFR
217
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
215
PFR
218
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
216
PFR
219
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
217
PFR
220
s. 12
218
PFR
221
s. 12
219
PFR
222
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kristine Yuen
January-05-16 8:51 AM
Dave Nosella
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
220
PFR
223
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
221
PFR
224
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
222
PFR
225
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
223
PFR
226
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Lori Ellis
January-05-16 9:08 AM
Kristine Yuen
Netami Stuart; Peter Klambauer; Dave Nosella
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
HPPark-PRequisition.pdf
Kristine,
For Humber Bay Park Revitalization: 9118-15-5046
Purchase Requisition No# EA 57487
SAP: 1166047
Project ID: 5119
Thanks,
Lori
From:KristineYuen
Sent:January05168:51AM
To:DaveNosella
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
PFR
227
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.
225
PFR
228
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
226
PFR
229
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
227
PFR
230
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kristine Yuen
January-05-16 9:45 AM
Dave Nosella; Gord Mcnally
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Gord
Please release req. 1166047
Tks
Kris
From:DaveNosella
Sent:January031611:16AM
To:KristineYuen
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
228
PFR
231
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
229
PFR
232
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
230
PFR
233
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
231
PFR
234
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Gord Mcnally
January-05-16 9:53 AM
Kristine Yuen; Dave Nosella
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Done
From:KristineYuen
Sent:January05169:45AM
To:DaveNosella;GordMcnally
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Gord
Please release req. 1166047
Tks
Kris
From:DaveNosella
Sent:January031611:16AM
To:KristineYuen
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
232
PFR
235
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
233
PFR
236
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
234
PFR
237
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
235
PFR
238
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
January-06-16 10:53 AM
Netami Stuart
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP - References
Hello, Netami:
the form for references looks good.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:January4,201612:42
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPReferences
HiagainMike,andhappyNewYear!
IhavereturnedoriginalsoftheCostofServicestoSuzanneasrequested(yousentmebothcopiessuppliedby
vendors).AttachedistherecordofhowIcontactedreferences.Ihopeitwilldo.Thereisnoformfor
contactingreferencesforRFPsthatIwasabletofind.Therewerenoquestions,criteria,orscoringfor
referencesmentionedanywhereintheRFP.TheRFPstatesthattheCityofTorontomaycontactthereferences
inForm7.
Thanks,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
236
PFR
239
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific
but I was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval,
which I understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthe
questionwasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
237
PFR
240
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his
word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but
from what I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the
recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee
report will also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your
recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
238
PFR
241
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedfor
thisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthe
timelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
239
PFR
242
s. 12
240
PFR
243
s. 12
241
PFR
244
s. 12
242
PFR
245
s. 12
243
PFR
246
244
s. 12
PFR
247
s. 12
245
PFR
248
s. 12
246
PFR
249
s. 12
247
PFR
250
s. 12
248
PFR
251
s. 12
249
PFR
252
250
s. 12
PFR
253
s. 12
251
PFR
254
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Netami Stuart
January-13-16 10:29 AM
Suzanne Bloomfield
Humber Bay Master Plan 9118-15-5046
HiSuzanne,
Couldyoupleasesendmeascanand/orcopyofthecostofservicesprovidedbyDTAHforthiscall.Iseemtohavesent
youbacktheonlyoneIhadandIneedtoprovidelegalwithacopy.
Thanks,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
252
PFR
255
253
s. 12
PFR
256
s. 12
254
PFR
257
s. 12
255
PFR
258
s. 12
256
PFR
259
s. 12
257
PFR
260
s. 12
258
PFR
261
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
January-14-16 4:34 PM
Mike Voelker
Fw: RFP 9118-15-5046 Legal agreement required?
Humber Bay Master Plan-LeA.doc
Pleaseletmeknowwhattodonow.Ineedtohiretheseguysverysoon.
Thanks,
N
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
259
s. 12
PFR
262
s. 12
260
PFR
263
s. 12
261
PFR
264
s. 12
262
PFR
265
s. 12
263
PFR
266
264
s. 12
PFR
267
s. 12
265
PFR
268
266
s. 12
PFR
269
267
s. 12
PFR
270
s. 12
268
PFR
271
s. 12
269
PFR
272
s. 12
270
PFR
273
271
s. 12
PFR
274
272
s. 12
PFR
275
s. 12
273
PFR
276
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
January-19-16 11:01 AM
'James Roche'
Humber Bay Parks Master Plan - Legal Agreement Draft
Humber Bay Master Plan-LeA_draft.doc
HiJames,
AttachedisadraftofalegaldocumentthatwillberequiredforDTAHtosignbeforewecanissueaPO.Thedocument
isforyourreviewandcommentandissubjecttofurtherreviewandrevisionbytheCity'slegaldepartment.
Pleaseprovideyourquestions/commentsandwewilltrytogetitfinalizedandsignedASAP.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
274
PFR
277
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
HiNetami
NocommentsexcepttoaddsecondsignaturelineforDTAH.
Weusuallygettwopartnerstosign.
Regards
James
HiJames,
AttachedisadraftofalegaldocumentthatwillberequiredforDTAHtosignbeforewecanissueaPO.Thedocument
isforyourreviewandcommentandissubjecttofurtherreviewandrevisionbytheCity'slegaldepartment.
Pleaseprovideyourquestions/commentsandwewilltrytogetitfinalizedandsignedASAP.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
275
PFR
278
s. 7(1)
HiJames,
AttachedisadraftofalegaldocumentthatwillberequiredforDTAHtosignbeforewecanissueaPO.Thedocument
isforyourreviewandcommentandissubjecttofurtherreviewandrevisionbytheCity'slegaldepartment.
Pleaseprovideyourquestions/commentsandwewilltrytogetitfinalizedandsignedASAP.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
276
PFR
279
277
PFR
280
From:JamesRoche[mailto:jroche@dtah.com]
Sent:January22163:47PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:FW:HumberBayParksMasterPlanLegalAgreementDraft
HiNetami
NocommentsexcepttoaddsecondsignaturelineforDTAH.
Weusuallygettwopartnerstosign.
278
PFR
s. 12
281
Regards
James
HiJames,
AttachedisadraftofalegaldocumentthatwillberequiredforDTAHtosignbeforewecanissueaPO.Thedocument
isforyourreviewandcommentandissubjecttofurtherreviewandrevisionbytheCity'slegaldepartment.
Pleaseprovideyourquestions/commentsandwewilltrytogetitfinalizedandsignedASAP.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
279
PFR
282
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
January-26-16 10:51 AM
Netami Stuart
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -defence checks pending
Hello, Netami:
I checked my e-mail and still cannot find any record of having received your Reference Check doc. Please advise soonest
rgds. . . . hmv
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December29,201510:00
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
280
PFR
283
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific
but I was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval,
which I understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthe
questionwasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his
word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
281
PFR
284
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but
from what I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the
recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee
report will also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your
recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedfor
thisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthe
timelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
282
PFR
285
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
283
PFR
286
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Netami Stuart
January-26-16 10:54 AM
Mike Voelker
FW: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
9118-15-5046_references.docx
Hereyougo.
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:January041612:42PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiagainMike,andhappyNewYear!
IhavereturnedoriginalsoftheCostofServicestoSuzanneasrequested(yousentmebothcopiessuppliedby
vendors).AttachedistherecordofhowIcontactedreferences.Ihopeitwilldo.Thereisnoformforcontacting
referencesforRFPsthatIwasabletofind.Therewerenoquestions,criteria,orscoringforreferencesmentioned
anywhereintheRFP.TheRFPstatesthattheCityofTorontomaycontactthereferencesinForm7.
Thanks,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
284
PFR
287
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP 285
PFR
288
timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
286
PFR
289
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
287
PFR
290
Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mike Voelker
January-26-16 11:12 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP - References
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:January26,201610:54
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:FW:9118155046HumberBayParksMPReferences
Hereyougo.
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:January041612:42PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiagainMike,andhappyNewYear!
IhavereturnedoriginalsoftheCostofServicestoSuzanneasrequested(yousentmebothcopiessuppliedby
vendors).AttachedistherecordofhowIcontactedreferences.Ihopeitwilldo.Thereisnoformfor
contactingreferencesforRFPsthatIwasabletofind.Therewerenoquestions,criteria,orscoringfor
referencesmentionedanywhereintheRFP.TheRFPstatesthattheCityofTorontomaycontactthereferences
inForm7.
Thanks,
Netami
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
288
PFR
291
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
Netami
From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific
but I was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval,
which I understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthe
questionwasmeantforPavilion.
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
289
PFR
292
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his
word.
. . . hmv
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?
SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but
from what I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the
recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee
report will also be necessary.
290
PFR
293
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your
recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
HiMike,
WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedfor
thisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthe
timelines.
Allthebest,
NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6
nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
291
PFR
294
RFP: 9118-15-5046
Location: Humber Bay Park
Detailed Evaluation Scoring Results
Proponent
Evaluators
Netami
Katy
Ruthanne
Peter
Average
(1-5)
Lori
Weighted
DTAH
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
1.20
5.0 pts
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.25
4.25
4.15
4.15
1.30
5.0 pts
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.25
4.25
4.05
4.05
1.40
5.0pts
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.25
4.25
4.35
4.35
5.0 pts
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.40
4.40
2.20
5.0 pts
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.40
4.40
3.10
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.50
9.00
4.30
8.60
3.20
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.50
9.00
4.30
8.60
3.30
2.5 pts
3.00
1.50
3.00
1.50
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.50
2.25
3.70
1.85
3.40
2.5 pts
3.00
1.50
3.00
1.50
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.50
1.25
3.30
1.65
3.50
10.50
4.00
12.00
3.50
10.50
4.00
12.00
3.50
10.50
3.70
11.10
Project Understanding
5.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
1.10
15.0 pts
Cost of Services
5.10
max 25 pts
Total Score
25.00
63.50
60.50
63.00
PFR
61.00
62.75
87.15
295
Proponent
Evaluators
Netami
Katy
Ruthanne
Peter
Average
(1-5)
Lori
Weighted
2.00
3.00
4.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
1.10
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.30
8.60
1.20
5.0 pts
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
1.30
5.0 pts
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.50
3.50
1.40
5.0pts
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.50
3.50
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.30
3.30
5.0 pts
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.50
3.50
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.30
3.30
2.20
5.0 pts
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.60
3.60
3.10
10.0 pts
3.50
7.00
3.50
7.00
3.50
7.00
2.50
5.00
3.00
6.00
3.20
6.40
3.20
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.20
8.40
3.30
2.5 pts
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
3.50
1.75
3.90
1.95
3.40
2.5 pts
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
3.50
1.75
3.90
1.95
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
Project Understanding
5.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
15.0 pts
Cost of Services
5.10
max 25 pts
Total Score
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
56.00
56.00
57.00
52.50
56.00
PFR
55.50
296
Proponent
Evaluators
Netami
Katy
Ruthanne
Peter
Average
(1-5)
Lori
Weighted
GH3 Inc.
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
1.10
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.50
9.00
4.40
8.80
1.20
5.0 pts
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.10
4.10
1.30
5.0 pts
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.70
2.70
1.40
5.0pts
2.50
2.50
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.90
2.90
5.0 pts
3.50
3.50
4.50
4.50
3.50
3.50
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.70
3.70
2.20
5.0 pts
3.00
3.00
4.50
4.50
3.50
3.50
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.60
3.60
3.10
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.10
8.20
3.20
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.10
8.20
3.30
2.5 pts
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
3.40
2.5 pts
4.00
2.00
3.50
1.75
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
3.90
1.95
4.00
12.00
3.50
10.50
4.00
12.00
4.00
12.00
3.50
10.50
3.80
11.40
Project Understanding
5.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
15.0 pts
Cost of Services
5.10
max 25 pts
Total Score
22.92
58.50
57.75
57.50
PFR
56.00
58.00
80.47
297
Proponent
Evaluators
Netami
Katy
Ruthanne
Peter
Average
(1-5)
Lori
Weighted
2.00
3.00
4.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
1.10
10.0 pts
3.50
7.00
2.50
5.00
3.50
7.00
2.50
5.00
3.50
7.00
3.10
6.20
1.20
5.0 pts
3.00
3.00
2.50
2.50
3.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
2.70
2.70
1.30
5.0 pts
3.00
3.00
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.70
3.70
1.40
5.0pts
3.00
3.00
3.50
3.50
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.30
3.30
5.0 pts
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
4.00
4.00
3.50
3.50
3.60
3.60
2.20
5.0 pts
3.50
3.50
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.50
3.50
3.90
3.90
3.10
10.0 pts
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
3.50
7.00
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
3.70
7.40
3.20
10.0 pts
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
3.50
7.00
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
3.70
7.40
3.30
2.5 pts
0.00
0.00
3.00
1.50
3.00
1.50
4.00
2.00
2.50
1.25
2.50
1.25
3.40
2.5 pts
3.00
1.50
3.00
1.50
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.50
1.25
3.30
1.65
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
Project Understanding
5.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
15.0 pts
Cost of Services
5.10
max 25 pts
Total Score
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
51.00
51.00
52.50
51.50
52.00
PFR
51.60
298
Proponent
Evaluators
Netami
Katy
Ruthanne
Peter
Average
(1-5)
Lori
Weighted
2.00
3.00
4.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
1.10
10.0 pts
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
3.90
7.80
1.20
5.0 pts
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.60
3.60
1.30
5.0 pts
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.10
4.10
1.40
5.0pts
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
3.50
3.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.0 pts
3.50
3.50
4.00
4.00
3.50
3.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.80
3.80
2.20
5.0 pts
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.50
3.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.90
3.90
3.10
10.0 pts
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
3.50
7.00
3.50
7.00
3.70
7.40
3.20
10.0 pts
3.00
6.00
3.00
6.00
3.50
7.00
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
3.40
6.80
3.30
2.5 pts
2.00
1.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
2.00
3.50
1.75
3.10
1.55
3.40
2.5 pts
2.00
1.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
2.00
3.50
1.75
3.10
1.55
3.00
9.00
3.00
9.00
2.50
7.50
2.50
7.50
3.50
10.50
2.90
8.70
Project Understanding
5.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
15.0 pts
Cost of Services
5.10
max 25 pts
Total Score
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
53.50
54.00
48.00
54.50
56.00
PFR
53.20
299
Proponent
Evaluators
Netami
Katy
Ruthanne
Peter
Average
(1-5)
Lori
Weighted
2.00
3.00
4.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
1.10
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
4.50
9.00
5.00
10.00
4.50
9.00
4.60
9.20
1.20
5.0 pts
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
3.90
3.90
1.30
5.0 pts
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.50
4.60
4.60
1.40
5.0pts
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.20
4.20
5.0 pts
4.50
4.50
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
2.20
5.0 pts
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.40
4.40
3.10
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
5.00
10.00
5.00
10.00
4.00
8.00
4.50
9.00
4.60
9.20
3.20
10.0 pts
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.50
9.00
4.00
8.00
4.50
9.00
4.30
8.60
3.30
2.5 pts
4.00
2.00
3.50
1.75
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.50
2.25
4.00
2.00
3.40
2.5 pts
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.50
2.25
4.10
2.05
4.50
13.50
4.00
12.00
4.50
13.50
5.00
15.00
4.50
13.50
4.50
13.50
Project Understanding
5.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
15.0 pts
Cost of Services
5.10
max 25 pts
Total Score
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.07
66.00
64.25
67.00
66.00
67.50
85.22
PFR
300
Proponent
Evaluators
Netami
Katy
Ruthanne
Peter
Average
(1-5)
Lori
Weighted
2.00
3.00
4.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
SCORE WEIGHTED
10.0 pts
3.50
7.00
3.00
6.00
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
4.00
8.00
3.60
7.20
1.20
5.0 pts
3.00
3.00
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
2.00
2.00
3.50
3.50
3.10
3.10
1.30
5.0 pts
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.50
3.50
3.30
3.30
1.40
5.0pts
2.50
2.50
3.50
3.50
3.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
3.50
3.50
2.90
2.90
5.0 pts
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.50
3.50
3.90
3.90
2.20
5.0 pts
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.50
3.50
4.00
4.00
3.10
10.0 pts
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
3.50
7.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
3.80
7.60
3.20
10.0 pts
4.00
8.00
3.50
7.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
4.00
8.00
3.90
7.80
3.30
2.5 pts
3.00
1.50
2.50
1.25
3.00
1.50
4.00
2.00
3.50
1.75
3.20
1.60
3.40
2.5 pts
3.00
1.50
2.50
1.25
3.00
1.50
4.00
2.00
3.50
1.75
3.20
1.60
4.00
12.00
3.50
10.50
3.50
10.50
4.00
12.00
3.50
10.50
3.70
11.10
Project Understanding
5.00
SCORE WEIGHTED
1.10
15.0 pts
Cost of Services
5.10
max 25 pts
Total Score
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
55.00
52.00
54.00
54.00
55.50
PFR
54.10
301
HumberBayParksMasterPlan&Phase1ImplementationRFP
9118155046
ReferencesContactedforRecommendedVendor
Thefollowingrefereeswereincludedintheproposalbytherecommendedvendorforthiscall.The
refereeswereaskedthefollowing:
"IamcallingyoubecauseyournamewasprovidedasareferenceforDTAHinaproposalforservicesfor
parkmasterplanningwiththeCityofToronto.Asaformerclient/client'srepresentativeofDTAHfor
similarservices[mentionprojectfromForm7],pleasetellmeaboutyourexperiencewithDTAHand
provideanyinformationthatwillhelptoinformtheCity'sdecisionwhethertoawardacontractfor
masterplanningtoDTAH."
GarthArmour(contactedJanuary4th,2016)
Manager,HorticultureandGreenhouseOperations
4163920360
ourexperiencewasexcellent.
verythorough
theywereresponsiveintermsofeverythingtheywereaskedtodo
Irecommendgettingclarificationfromthemontheirinsurance,astherewassomeminorissuethat
wasresolved.
DavidStonehouse(contactedDecember18,2015)
Chair,WaterfrontSecretariat
4163928113
experiencewasexcellent.
BryceMirandawasoneofthebestIhaveworkedwith.
DavidKusturin(contactedJanuary4th,2016)
COO,WaterfrontToronto
4162141344x255
WTOhasalongandpositiverelationshipwiththisfirmthathasdesignedandmanagedthe
constructionofmuchoftherevitalizedwaterfrontinToronto
basedonwhatthey'vedeliveredovertheyears,WTOisveryhappyandthepublicisveryhappy
thereisnothingnegativetosay
wecontinuetoinvitethemtobidonworkforusandwewouldn'tdothatifweweren'tsatisfiedwith
theirwork.
PFR
302
PFR
303
PFR
304
PFR
305
PFR
306
iill TORONTO
Michael Pacholok
Chief Purchasing CUicial & Director
MSFI 2N2
In:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Enclosed arc seven (7) proposals received twin the following oponcnt for all Professional and
Technical Services to complete the Flutuher Ha) Park Master Plan and Phase I Intplcmentation.
Firm
Nanie
I.
2.
DTAI I
EOTI NN Consultants Inc.
(if 13 Inc.
Scott. Torrance Landscape Architect Inc.
The M I3TW Group *
The I I aiming Partnership Lid.
Victor I ord & Associates Inc. S
:.
4.
5.
ft
7.
Standing Con unittee ht t p:!? nsideto.t on nt o.ca/ptirchasm Lz)pd I/st a H report temnpl at eOY.pd t and
I p://i asidet o.t oront o.ca/secret ar at/st a H report/report tei npl at es/act iontenipl at e.dot
Please note that you must provide to PMMD a (let ailed summary of He evaluation resul Is, in order to
permit fttlfillmimetit of complete due diligence practices. NOTE: Do not write any personal notes on
the scoring sheets as these sheets are often requested by the Freedom of Inlormation Office. You
PFR
307
in ust also in aRe available to PM MD upon request, all replies arid 111(11 V id ual evaluation sheets horn
evaluation team members, and you are responsible for retaining the origiii;iI cleta: led individual
evaluation sheets for audit and other purposes. A copy of the Policy for tie Select ion and 1-firing of
I ro lessional and Consulting Serv ices and Request for Proposal procedures are avail able or t the liii ranet
at:
I1I1JLini!Mj.cii y.toronto.on.qjptnthasme/pol icipmcechircs.him
Please note that Section 7.5 of the Request for Proposal Procedure requires that all neiiihers of the
evaluation team are qual flied to properly evaluate t lie proposals and t lint each evaluation team member,
whether a stall member or an outside consultant, signs a Conflict of Interest Declaration disclosing any
entertainment, gifts or other benehts, iii cash or in kind, received front the proponent or their
representatives and certifying that he or she conducted tile evaluation in a fair and objective nuttier and.
free oh any conflict of interest or undue influence. The delnutnierit shall keeji copy of this declaration
br their records, and l)ro\ide a copy to the PMMD hu3er for the REP lIe. 11w Conflict of Inierest
Declaration form can be fcanid on the intrnnct at:
liii p://i nsldeto.cltv.torontoAuLcalpurchas !iW/word/p a lid lorin con] ict I Hint crest iloc
When rev iewi ni proposals for products/services von are to give consideration to
enviror mieni ally preferred products/services that nw be oil ered in accordance wit Ii the
I tn iroiiniental ly Responsible Procurement Statement attached to your Request for Proposals.
S houltl you not recommend environmentally preferred products/services ti at i nay have been
offered. pleise advise in detail your reasons.
Please ensure that your specifications for future acquisitions are. expanded to ensure the inclusion
of environmentally preferred protlticts/senices, wherever possible, as rcqu iied by t] te City of
rorontc) 1 nviwimieinal ly Responsible Procurement Policy.
f you have not already done so. please send a requisition wit Ii your recoinmendat ion in order
that a purchase order can be issued.
Attached is a Consultant Perfbnnanee Report I oral. This forn i can he used to tack t lie
penimce of \ei idors over the period of the contract wit Ii the C it It s not n iandatorv to fill
this lorin out however; it will be a useful evaluation tool when evaluating consultant
perforniarice and i niproving future call docuriient details.
.
Information ott how the. Consultant Performance Report Form works is in the attachment of this
menu).
Should you have any quest ions, pleise contact Mike Voelker at 41633 X01 X7.
Nc ii e: P1 ease treat all documentation tl iat has bee ii forwarded to you on this in at ter as
C( )N liIIWNTIAL.
[md
ostue
PFR
308
#_______________
WHEREAS the Member will be reviewing and evaluating proposal documents submitted by the
proponents to the City that may contain confidential information (the Information);
AND WHEREAS it is a requirement of the City that no individuals may serve on the Evaluation Team
where a conflict of interest exists;
AND WHEREAS the City is relying on this declaration as a condition of the Member participating on the
Evaluation Team;
2.
The above obligations in 1Q)(H)(Hi) and (iv) shall not apply to any Information which is or which
becomes generally known to the public by means other than a breach of this Agreement by a
Member.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
3
The Member declares that he or she or any member of his or her immediate family:
(i)
(H)
(Hi)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
has no: received any gifts, entertainment, or other benefits, in cash or in kind, from any
proponents or their representatives:
has no direct or indirect financial interest in the award of the contract for this RFP;
has not been in the employ of, under contract with or involved in a business association
such as a partnership or joint venture with any proponents within one year prior to the
publication date of this RFP;
is not currently employed by, under contract with or involved in a business association
such as a partnership or joint venture with any proponent;
is not negotiating nor has any arrangement concerning future employment, contracting or
business association with any proponent; and
has no ownership interest in, and is not an officer or director of, any proponent or any
related company of a proponent.
4.
The Member declares that he or she is familiar with the Citys Conflict of Interest Policy that governs
all Cty employees, and has reported any and all personal or financial interests that might present a
conflict or bias in connection with his or her participation on the Evaluation Team.
5.
The Member certifies that he or she will conduct the evaluation in a fair and objective manner, free
from any contl.ct of interest or undue influence.
Signature:
PFR
309
2.
The above obligations in 1 (i)(ii)(iii) and (iv) shall not apply to any Information
which is or which
becomes generally known to the public by means other than a breach
of this Agreement by a
Member.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
3.
The Member declares that he or she or any member of his or her immediate
family:
(i)
has not received any gifts, entertainment, or other benefits, in cash or in kind,
from any
proponents or their representatives;
(ii)
has no direct or indirect financial interest in the award of the contract for this
RFP;
(iii)
has not been in the employ of, under contract with or involved in a busine
ss association
such as a partnership or joint venture with any proponents within one year
prior to the
publication date of this REP;
(iv)
is not currently employed by, under contract with or involved in a busine
ss association
such as a partnership or joint venture with any proponent;
(v)
is not negotiating nor has any arrangement concerning future employment,
contracting or
business association with any proponent; and
(vi)
has no ownership interest in, and is not an officer or director of, any propon
ent or any
related company of a proponent.
4.
The Member declares that he or she is familiar with the Citys Conflict of
Interest Policy that governs
all City employees, and has reported any and all personal or financi
al interests that might present a
conflict or bias in connection with his or her participation on the Evalua
tion Team.
5.
The Member certifies that he or she will conduct the evaluation in fair
a
and objective manner, free
from any conflict of interest or undue influence.
Name:
,
Signature:
_Ih
/7
ct&
-1
PFR
310
PFR
311
PFR
312
PFR
313
PFR
314
PFR
315
PFR
316
PFR
317
PFR
318
PFR
319
PFR
320
PFR
321
PFR
322
PFR
323
PFR
324
PFR
325
PFR
326
PFR
327
PFR
328
PFR
329
PFR
330
PFR
331
PFR
332
PFR
333
PFR
334
PFR
335
PFR
336
PFR
337
PFR
338