2016-05-26 Criminal complaint against Ms Esperanza Alon from the Haifa Magistrate Court Judge, which was filed with the Israel Police, and Request, filed with the Attorney General to instruct the Israel Police to investigate the complaint // תלונה פלילית, שהוגשה למשטרת ישראל, נגד הגב' אספרנצה אלון בתפקידה כשופטת בית המשפט השלום חיפה, ובקשה ליועמ"ש להורות על חקירתה

Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Joseph Zernik, PhD

PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel
Fax: 077-3179186
'
6133301 ",33407 "
Email: joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org
Josep
h
Zernik
Digitally signed by
Joseph Zernik
DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o=Human
Rights Alert - NGO,
ou,
email=joseph.zernik
@hra-ngo.org, c=IL
Date: 2016.05.26
11:01:13 +03'00'
BilingualfilingEnglishfollowstheHebrew
20160525CriminalcomplaintagainstMsEsperanzaAloninhercapacityasHaifa
MagistrateCourtJudge,whichwasfiledwiththeIsraelPolice,andRequest,filedwith
theAttorneyGeneraltoinstructtheIsraelPolicetoinvestigatethecomplaint//
',,
",
TableofContents
Page
#
1.
"
Request,filedwiththeAttorneyGeneral,toinstructtheIsraelPolicetoinvestigatecriminal
complaintagainstEsperanzaAlon
2
4
'
Criminalcomplaint,filedwiththeIsraelPolice,againstMsEsperanzaAloninhercapacityasHaifa
MagistrateCourtJudge
9
25
48
3.
IsraelPolicecertificateoffilingcriminalcomplaint//
4.
6.
Attachments
''
A.JosephZernik,PhDBiosketch
,(')2012,31(/88/12)'
B.May31,2012decision(12/88/TelAvivDistrict)byOmbudsmanoftheJudiciarypertainingto
JudgeVardaAlshech'sfabricatedprotocols
,(162300)/""'
.(,.)
C.September12,2011twosham/simulatedProtocolrecordsbyJudgeVardaAlshechin Bank
HaPoalimvStateReceiver(162300)intheTelAvivDistrictCourt,whichwerethesubjectofthe
.Ombudsman'sdecision(B.,above)
,:,2013,22'
...
D.May22,2013Declaration,filedintheHaifaMagistrateCourt:JudgeEsperanzaAlon:Ms
mysteriesofcourtprocedure,orperverterofjusticewithimpunity...
,2013,22'
E.August22,2013requestforprotection,filedwiththeGermanConsultoIsrael.
1/48
)Human Rights Alert (NGO
'
" ,33407" 6133301
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Fax: 077-3179186
Bilingual filing English follows the Hebrew
262016,
,2991010
'026466521/2:026467001:
pniyot.tzibur@justice.gov.il:
:)'(,,,
,
,45,
14
)("1958
,
,,
.
:/
",
)','(.
.,
,
.:/
/.
,,"".
,
",/88/12)(31
)2012,'(,"")'(.
,,,/,
/,,.
"",.,
,,,
,,.
":,
/,.(2001)
04,2013,"")
(.,"",
"",,)..(5:
2/48
04,2013,12,2011,',
""...
,",
,,
.)(
.
(2001)
.,,
.".
,)(
:".
)(.
,,,...
,,.
.,,
"")22,2013,:
,,...'(.
,,,)(
":",,
"][,,".
,,
""""...,
,.
)22
,2013,,'(.
,,
.)"(
,
,
.,,,.
,,...,
.,")
(.
,
,:
...
,,
...
3/48
/,,,
.,
.,
.,
,
_________________
'
6133301",33407"
joseph.zernik@hrango.org:"
:
.
:
muamadim@court.gov.il
,sar@justice.gov.il,ashaked@knesset.gov.il
,,,,
May26,2016
AttorneyGeneralAvichaiMandelblit
MinistryofJustice
29SalahaDinSt,Jerusalem91010
Tel:026466521/2Fax:026467001
Bycertifiedmailandbyemail
RE:Criminalcomplaint(No)onfraud,perversionofjustice,perversionof
courtrecords,breachofloyaltyagainstEsperanzaAlon,oftheHaifaMagistrate
Court
Ihereinrequestconfirmationofreceiptwithin14daysandresponsewithin45days,
pursuanttotheAdministrativeProcedureReformAct(1958)
DearAttorneyGeneralMandelblit:
}leaseaccepttheattachedthecriminalcomplaintagainstEsperanzaAlon,referenced
above,whichwasfiledwithIsraelPoliceTelAviv,andmyrequesthereintoinstruct
theIsraelPolicetoimmediatelylaunchaninvestigationofthecomplaint.
Myexpertiseregardingfraudinthecourtsisrecognizedintheinternationalarena:
Myreportsonfraudand/orcorruptioninthecourtsinIsraelandbeyondhavebeen
incorporatedintothreeUNHumanRightsCouncilperiodicnationalreports,andmy
academicpapersonsuchsubjectswerepublishedsubjecttopeerreviewin
internationalconferencesoncriminologyandelectronicgovernment(JosephZernik,
PhDBiosketch,AttachmentA).
4/48
Theevidenceisonlyoutlinedinthecomplaintforbrevityofspace.However,the
evidence,whichisprovidedinthecomplaintprovidessufficientfoundationfora
decisiontoinitiatecriminalinvestigationofthecomplaint,whichoriginatesin
processofappointmentofaconservator.Inshort:EsperanzaAlonengagedinthe
conductofsham/simulatedcourtprocessandtheissuanceofsham/simulatedcourt
records,underthecolorofherappointmentasaHaifaMagistrateCourtJudge.Such
conductiswellknownworldwideastypicalcriminalconductbyjudges,whichisnot
coveredbyanyimmunity,sinceitisextrajudicialactivity.
ConductofEsperanzaAlonandothersinthemattersthatunderlyinstantcomplaintis
similartotheconductofVardaAlshechoftheTelAvivDistrictCourt,whichis
detailedintheMay31,2012decision(12/88/TelAvivDistrict)oftheOmbudsmanof
theJudiciary(AttachmentB),inthefabricatedprotocolsscandal(AttachmentC).
Suchconductisbasedonfraudontheparties,theircounsel,thepublicandthecourt
throughsham/simulatedcourtprocessandhearings,issuingofsham/simulated,
false,invalid,unsignedcourtrecords,whichareheldbythejudgesmerelyinvalid
drafts,asspelledoutintheOmbudsmandecision.Atthesametime,the
Ombudsman'sdecisiondocumentsthatsuchrecordsareemployedtomisleadthe
parties,counsel,andthepublicbyleadingthemtobelievethattheyaresigned,
lawful,validandenforceablecourtrecords.
TheabovereferencedOmbudsman'sdecisionraisesaninterestingissue:Instant
complaintsaysthatEsperanzaAlonroutinelyissuedsham/simulatedcourtrecords,
whichareunsignedbyelectronicsignaturepursuanttotheESignAct(2001).The
issueisparticularlystrikingintheApril04,2013Protocol,whichbearsawatersign
NotSignedYet(theOmbudsman'sdecisionexplicitlyreferstosuchwatersigns).At
thesametime,thesameprotocolrecordbearsinvalid,misleadinggraphic
signaturesandafalse,misleadingandfraudulentTrueCopyoftheOriginalstamp
(Figure5).Inshort,EsperanzaAlon'sApril04,2013protocolshowsthesame
featuresasVardaAlshech'sSeptember12,2011protocol,VersionA.Regarding
VersionA,boththeOmbudsmanandVardaAlshechagreedthatitwasmerelya
draft...
However,underthecircumstancesintheIsraelicourtstoday,itisobviousthat
AttorneyGeneralAvichaiMandelblit,IsraelPoliceinvestigators,theMinisterof
Justice,ormembersoftheJudicialAppointmentsCommittee,whicharenotjudgesin
office,cannotdirectlyinspectthesefundamentalfacts.Allinvestigatorsanddecision
makersinthismatterwouldhavetorelyoninformation,whichtheymay(ormay
not)receivefromtheAdministrationofCourts,regardingelectronicsignatureson
theserecords.
Suchabsurdsituation,pointsouttheessenceoftheIsraelijusticesystemfollowing
theESignAct(2001)andtheimplementationofnewcasemanagementsystemNet
HaMishpat.Inthepapercourtfiles,signaturesofthejudgesontheirdecisionswere
accessibletopartiesandcounsel,andalsotothepublicatlarge.However,inNet
HaMishpat,theelectronicsignaturesbecamehidden,invisibleTheEmperor'sNew
Clothes.IntheJewishHalachah,signaturesareemployedasacentral
authenticationinstrumentforover2000years:Hewhoservesadivorcedecreein
Israeldoesnothavetotestify[asmessengerofthecourtjz],itwaswrittenand
5/48
signedinmypresence,andifthereisanychallengetoit,itshouldbeupheldbyits
signers.(Talmud,Gitin,ChapterB,A),intheEnglishcommonlawandinthe
Ottomanlaw(threesourcesoftheIsraelilaw)forhundredsofyears.However,in
thecourtsoftheStateofIsraelthejudgeshavecreatedanewjudicialsystem,where
theirsignaturesarehidden...
EsperanzaAlon'sconduct,documentedinthecomplaint,wasexposedalreadyduring
theprocedures,butEsperanzaAlonrefusedtoceasesuchconduct.Onthecontrary
EsperanzaAlontriedtopresentsuchconductasbasedonthemysteriesofcourt
procedure...(May22,20134statement,filedintheHaifaMagistrateCourt:Judge
EsperanzaAlonMsmysteriesofcourtprocedure,orperverterofjusticewith
impunity...,AttachmentD).Indeed,EsperanzaAlon'sconduct,undertheguiseof
hercapacityasJudge,fitsthedescription,correctlyprovided(basedonmyinspection
ofthecorrespondingcourtfiles)bythelateselfimmolatedsocialactivistMoshe
Silmanintheopeningsentenceofhislastletter:TheTelAvivDistrictCourt
obstructedmyaccesstojustice.HagaiBrenner,MagistrateoftheTelAvivDistrict
Court[thenProTemDistrictJudgejz]disregardedthelaw,pervertedcourt
procedureswithimpunity.
Furthermore,afterIexposedtheconduct,whichisoutlinedinthecomplaint,motion
wasfiledincourttopunishmebyimposingonmeexemplarylegalfees,asa
punitivemeasureformydespicableconduct...SinceIwasinformedthatitwas
likelythatretaliatoryactionsagainstmewouldbelaunchedunderthecoloroflaw,I
filedunderduressarequestforprotectionbytheGermanGovernment.Therequest
recordprovidesfurtherdetailsofthefraudintheHaifaMagistrateCourtwithlinksto
thecorrespondingrecords(August22,2013RequestforProtection,filedwiththe
GermanConsulttoIsrael,AttachmentE).
Examinationofconservatorshipdecreesandconservatorshipproceduresinother
cases,whichwerebroughttomyattention,indicatesimilarconductbyotherjudges
aswell.TheAdministrationofCourtsandtheMinistryofJustice(inparticular
counseloftheAttorneyGeneral)weresupposedtoserveaschecksandbalancesfor
thesafeguardoftheintegrityofsuchproceduresinconservatorshipprocedures.The
evidenceshowsthattheyfailtodoso.
Therightsoftheconservatees,pursuanttothelawoftheStateofIsraelandpursuant
toHumanRightsininternationallaw,requireprotectionevenmorethanprisoners'
rights,sincetheconservatoroftengainsauthorityoverthebodyandthepropertyof
theconservateeconditionakintoslavery.Moreover,theconservatee,incontrast
withtheprisoner,cannotvoicehis/herconcernsinmostcases.Furthermore,mostof
theconservatorshipproceduresareconductedbehindcloseddoors,blockingsunlight
thebestofdisinfectants...Therefore,fraudandcorruptioninthecourtsin
conservatorshipmattersarewellknownproblemworldwide.Mostoften,themotive
istheconservatee'sproperty,particularlyrealestate(aswasthecasehereaswell).
Theongoingrefusaloftheauthoritiestoenforcethelawonseniorjusticeofficers,
andinparticularonjudges,isblatantanddisturbing:
JudgeVardaAlshechwascaughtperpetratingseriousfraudfromthebench
butshewasneverprosecutedandneverheldaccountableinamaterialway.
6/48
JudgeHilaCohenwascaughtpervertingcourtrecordsandcourtprocedures
andwasawardedwithenhancedlifetimebenefits...
JudgeYitzhakCohenwassuspectedofserioussexcrimes,includingsexcrimes
inchambers,andpolicerecommendedhisprosecutionbutitappearsunlikely
tohappenanytimesoon...
IntheRuthDavid,RonelFisher,EranMalkascandal,mediareportedof
evidencethatjudgesreceivedbribesorbenefitsbutitappearsthatthe
scandalwassilencedbytheauthoritywithouteverbeingdulyinvestigated.
Failuretodulyinvestigatetheattachedcomplaintanddulyenforcethelaw,would
furtherunderminedpublictrustinthejudiciary.
IhereinrequestthatyouimmediatelyinstructtheIsraelPolicetolaunchan
investigationofmycriminalcomplaintagainstEsperanzaAlon.
__________________
JosephZernik,PhD
POBox33407,TelAviv6133301
Email:joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org
Attached:
CriminalComplaint,filedwiththeIsraelPolice,anditsattachments
CC:
JudicialAppointmentsCommittee
MinsterofJustice
MembersofKnesset,publicfigures,media,activists,others
7/48
,
CertificateoffilingacriminalcomplaintwiththeIsraelPoliceFraud
Department,TelAviv
8/48
)Human Rights Alert (NGO
'
" ,33407" 6133301
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Fax: 077-3179186
Bilingual filing English follows the Hebrew
:,,,
,.
,.
.
',
.",.
'[1]'1".FBI,
,,FBI".
",
:
"(2010)"":
,".
(2013)"":
,
".
"(2015)""HumanRights:
Alert
".
""
)
(,:
),,
(
.
,
.(2012)""EurpeanConferenceonE)
(Government2015,,:
?"
""".
James Wedick
9/48
,.,,
.
.
,
,/
/.,
.
,.
,2010,.(18290610).
2013,,\.
"
.
,2013,,
,,(18290610),(256070313)
.
.
.
.
,,
:
.1".,
".
.2,/,/,
/.
.3.
,"",
.
"".,
/.,
,
.,
,.
".
,",".
".
.
2010,".
.1
.,,
"
10/48
.,
.
2010,)(,)
.2
,(,
)",(,
.
.
.1:(18290610))(2012.1
,2010,,)(,"
,][..,2010,
..,
,",1113,2010,,)(.
,,,,,
11/48
.,,
.
2010,,).(1
1

,
)(,,.""
1113,2010,).(1
,,,
,.,
.
2010,
).(1
,,.
.
2010,".,",
18
.3
.,2010.,
"",.
:.
.
,,"
".
.
",,,
.
2010,"")(2
13
.4
/:
)(,[2].
)(":
,"."1962
)(",",,
.
)(,
,").(16"
,.
.
,,"","".
,,
)(.
.
)','(:
2
)(,",1970,.1
12/48
)()
(",.
)(,,(2001)
,.
)(,,,
""..
)(,".
)(,,,
,".
'')'(.
,"
".,,"'
.
,,
,),
(.
,",,
",/.
13/48
.2":(18290610)"/13.2013,
)(,",1970,,1
,,.
",",,.
14/48
2011,)
.5
(,,,",
",,
.
".,
",,.
,
,,,
.".
.
,.
2012,"",
1
.6
""",".
:
)(:
,"",.
"...
)(
,.
,.,
",)(,
",.
.
2013,,(18290610)
13
.7
..
.,
...
,,
".
,.
"...
...
2013,",,
13
.8
).(3,
/
/:
.(18290610)
.
(3)."182906)
3,",1995)6(:
15/48
(10,"".(256070313)
",,..
").(3
.3":(256070313)""13.2013,
",,(18290610)
"".,,/
,,(18290610),,(256070313)
//.
.
2013,""
24
.9
4
,[ ].
).6(,
,)49(][,".1984
2013-03-24 4":(256070313)"
.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/160705826/
16/48
2013,""/"
28

"",,",
.(4).
,,
)("".
)(/.
)("".
)(/,,
,.
)(/,.
)(.
.10""/28,2013,"
"",.""
.
,
,""[5].,
,"".
""/
.,/.
,,.,,
/.
.11,",
)(.
,"."
.
,,,",
,".",
,."
.
.12",
,2008."
,.
,[6].
,,
.
5,",198420:
[18]')'(2"1996
.20,.
6,",198475:
'"2013
.75,.
17/48
.13,,
,.
.),
'(.,
,,.
2013,""/,
17
.14
).(4.
"".
/."
..,,,
,,.
"",.,
.
'
'
'
:4:(256070313)""21:2013,
,,"",,.(256070313)
,,(18290610),,...
'",:172016,256070313
.][60.
".
'",:172016,256070313
.45.,
"18290610,04.04.13.12:00".
',)(,
:172016,256070313.]
[60.".
",','.,
,','.
,...
:??
,".,/
04,2013,'.,/
,...
,",,".
.15""17)2013,:(4
)(",','
.
)(,,','
.
18/48
)(?:??
,
".,04)2013,'(
/,,
,/,""...
)(,",,
".
2013,//
04
.16
""):(5
)(/,(18290610),
"",.(256070313)
)(,""
...
)(/"".
,
""[7].
)(,,"".,,
...
)(.)
,(,
,.
)(.
,
.,
.
7"",.
,,,)(
/.,
....
19/48
'
20/48
'
.5 :(1829-06-10)//,04,2013,
.',1
,.,,)
(,,.',3
/",",,",.3:
,][.
"',.
21/48
',
"][.
//,
.,,,
,.
/,(18290610),
.(256070313)
/"".
,.
.17292013,"".
62013,""/),

,(6
.6":(1829-06-10)"/6,2013,,
./4
.2013,,/,,(18290610)
,,,""
(256070313).
"...
/,
":,,,...
),,
(.
222013,""/,6,
.18
,,2013,:
""?)'(.
...
2013,",
3
.19
8
",[ ].(256070313)
8
20130703"(256070313)"","
,,,"".
22/48
,"
...
".
,2003[9]...
""..."....
.
":)
.[10](...
,
"]...
[
2013,,
22
.20
",
)'(.
2013,""/,"
.2117
",.
.
."",,
""."..
...
,
...,
",/.
.22,
.
,,,
""".
.
,,""""".
.,
,.,
""...
9)(,"2003:
.3,1)(,
,.
).4( )(,
.
20130703 10"(256070313)
https://www.scribd.com/doc/154603515/
23/48
:7:(256070313)""/17,
.201313),2013,(2.
"""",
.,
,)','(.
/4.2013,
.."".
24/48
",,
,,..
.23,,
",.
,
.
,
,,""[11]...
.
/,,.
",
.
:
,26,2016,
_________________
'
",33407"6133301
"joseph.zernik@hrango.org:
IsraelPolice
TelAviv
Byhanddelivery
RE:CriminalComplaintonfraud,perversionofjustice,perversionofcourt
records,breachofloyaltyagainstEsperanzaAlonoftheHaifaMagistrateCourt
forthesakeofbrevity,instantcomplaintpresentsonlytheessenceoftheevidencefor
theallegedcrimesofthesubjectofthecomplaint.Furtherdetailsareprovidedinthe
attachmentstoinstantcomplaint,andIwouldbehappytoproviderecordsand
testimonyonceaninvestigationisopened.
A.Complainant
JosephZernik,PhDoverthepastdecadeIhavespecializedinstudyingfraudby
judges,attorneysandothersinthecourtsinIsraelandbeyond.Myexpertisehas
beenrecognizedbyUSfraudexperts,whichissuedreportsinsupportofmyfindings,
themostnotableofthemisMrJamesWedick,formerFBISpecialAgentwhois
likelytobetheNo1fraudexpertintheUStoday.MrWedickwascommendedforhis
2016031611/"?"_
http://www.news1.co.il/Archive/0024-D-111844-00.html
25/48
contributiontolawenforcementbytheAttorneyGeneral,FBIHead,andtheUS
Congress.
Myexpertiseinfraudinthecourtswasrecognizedalsobythreereports,whichIfiled
withtheUNHumanRightsCouncil,andwhichwereincorporated,subjectto
ProfessionalStaffreviewintheperiodicnationalreportsoftheCouncil:
UnitedStates(2010)myreportwasincorporatedintotheCouncil'sfinal
reportwiththenote:Corruptionofthecourtsandthelegalprofessionand
discriminationbylawenforcementinCalifornia.
Israel(2013)myreportwasincorporatedintotheCouncil'sfinalreportwith
thenote:LackofintegrityintheelectronicrecordsystemsoftheSupreme
Court,thedistrictcourtsandthedetaineescourtsinIsrael.
UnitedStates(2015)myreportwasincorporatedintotheCouncil'sfinal
reportwiththenote:HRANGOrecommendedrestoringtheintegrityofthe
ITsystemsofthecourts,underaccountabilitytotheCongress,withthegoalof
makingsuchsystemsastransparentaspossibletothepublicatlarge.
MyexpertisewasalsorecognizedinatextbookonMachineLearning,wheremy
academicpublicationsarecitedasaparagraph,whichdescribestheuseofdata
mininginstudyingHumanRightsasaNotableUse(Iamapparentlythefirstwho
publishedinthisparticularfield):
Dataminingofgovernmentrecordsparticularlyrecordsofthejusticesystem
(i.e.,courts,prisons)enablesthediscoveryofsystemichumanrights
violationsinconnectiontogenerationandpublicationofinvalidorfraudulent
legalrecordsbyvariousgovernmentagencies.
Myexpertiseinthisfieldwasalsorecognizedbypublicationsinperiodicalsand
conferencesinthecorrespondingfields,includingtheWorldCriminologyCongress
(2012).Ahighlyrankedconferenceonegovernment(ECEG2015)publishedmy
study,subjecttodoublepeerreview,titledFraudulentnewITsystemsintheIsraeli
courtsunannouncedregimechange?Recently,Iwasalsoinvitedtowriteachapter
onecourtsandhumanrightsinatextbookonegovernment,tobepublishedby
Springer.
Iamnotanattorney,andIhavenoformallegaleducation.Therefore,Ididnotwrite
inthecomplainttherelevantarticlesofthecriminalcode,andpoliceisaskedtoadd
themafterinvestigatingthecomplaint.
B.Subjectofthecomplaint
EsperanzaAloninstantcomplaintisfiledagainstEsperanzaAlonasamemberof
thepublicatlarge,andthemainclaimininstantcomplaintisthatEsperanzaAlon
engagedinseriouscriminalityintheHaifaMagistrateCourtthroughtheconductof
sham/simulatedcourtprocess.Theclaimisthatsuchconductwasperpetratedby
EsperanzaAlonasamemberofthepublicatlarge,whilemisleadingotherstobelieve
thatshewasitwaspartofherconductunderherauthorityasaMagistrateCourt
Judge.Suchconductisrecognizedworldwideassimulatedcourtprocessunderthe
coloroflaw.
26/48
InJune2010thefirstcourtfilewasopened,Inre:ConservateeRS(18290610).The
courtfilewaspresidedbyJudgeEhudRekem.
InJanuary2013Ifirstinspectedthecourtfileanddiscoveredinitfalseand
misleadingrecords,allegedfraud.
Immediatelyafterwards,thecourtfilewastakenoverbyEsperanzaAlon,withno
obviousreasonandwithnodecisionornotice,whichprovidethelegalfoundationfor
reassignment.
AroundMarchMay2013,conductofEsperanzaAlon,whichisthecoreofinstant
complaint,reacheditspeak,withtheclosingoftheoriginalcourtfile(18290610),
andopeningofanewcourtfile,Inre:ConservateeRS(256070313)withno
foundationinthelaw.
Thecomplaintmakesitabundantlyclearthatotherswerefullpartnersintheconduct
ofEsperanzaAlon.However,thecomplaintisfocusedonconductofEsperanzaAlon
herself.
C.AllegedCrimes
TheevidenceindicatesthatEsperanzaAlon,undertheguiseofherappointmentas
HaifaMagistrateCourtJudge,engagedin:
1.
FraudonthebenchinconservatorappointmentprocessforanAlzheimer
patientRS.Theevidenceindicatesthatthemotiveforthefraudwasexecutionof
realestatetransactionsthatwereintendedtoperverttheintentionofthepatient's
writtenwill.
2.
Perversionofjusticeandperversionofcourtrecords,throughtheissuanceof
sham/simulatedcourtrecords,theconductofsham/simulatedcourthearing,and
conductofasham/simulatedcourtprocess.
3.
BreachofLoyalty.
Itshouldbenotedthatfraudandperversionofcourtprocessandcourtrecordonthe
benchareextrajudicialconduct,andarenotcoveredbyanyimmunity.Itshould
benotedthatconductofEsperanzaAlontookplaceaboutayearafterthe
OmbudsmanoftheJudiciarydecisioninasimilarmatterJudgeVardaAlshech
FabricatedProtocolsscandal.Therefore,thereisnodoubtthatEsperanzaAlon
knewthatshewasengagedinimproperand/orcriminalconduct.Thereisroomfor
concernthatthefailuretoimposeanymaterialpenaltyonJudgeVardaAlshech,and
thefailuretoprosecutehercreatedconditions,whereEsperanzaAlondidnothesitate
toengageformanymonthsinconductthatshouldbedeemedseriouscriminality.
Therefore,thereishighpublicpolicyinterestintheinvestigationofinstantcomplaint,
andenforcementofthelaw,accordingtotheinvestigationoutcome.
Withit,itisobviousthattheIsraelPoliceholdsnoauthoritytoinvestigatesitting
judgeswithoutanexplicitinstructionbytheAttorneyGeneral.Therefore,Iattachto
instantcomplaintacopyofmylettertotheAttorneyGeneral,whichwouldbesentto
theAttorneyGeneralfollowingthefilingofinstantcriminalcomplaint.Intheletter,
theAttorneyGeneralisrequestedtoinstructtheIsraelPolicetoimmediatelyinitiate
investigationofinstantcriminalcomplaint.
27/48
D.Briefoutlineoftheeventsrelatedtoinstantcomplaint
1. AttheendofApril2010IreturnedtoIsrael,followingalongstayabroad.At
thattimemymotherwasalreadyanAlzheimerpatientinadvancedstagefora
numberofyears.Soonafterwardsconductwasinitiated,whichIdiscoveredlater
asfraudintendedtoexecuterealestatetransactionsandotheractions,inorderto
excludemefrommymother'sinheritance.Mymother'sinheritanceisnotknown
tometoday,buttheintentionisclearoutoftheconductoftherelatedpersons.
2. InearlyJune,2010RafaelZernik(thenanelderlypersonofdubious
competence),DrorZernik(whoaccordingtohimselfwasatthetimeasenior
figureinanenterpriseforsurveillanceofonlinesexcrimes,andtherefore,
effectivelyanaffiliateoflawenforcement),andUriZernik(wholivedintheUS,
butarrivedforashortvisitinIsrael)initiatedthefraudbyfilingintheHaifa
MagistrateCourtarequestforappointmentofRafaelZernikconservatorformy
mother,yearsaftershehadbecomeincompetent.
a.
b.
28/48
.
c.
Figure1.Inre:ConservateeRS(18290610):Aconservatorappointmentprocedure,originatedin
frauda.OnJune1,2010,RafaelZerniksignedafalseandmisleadingaffidavit,statingthatmy
Uncle(myMother'sbrother)consentedtohisrequesttobeappointedconservatorformyMother,
andthatopinionofJosephZernikisunknown,sinceheseveredcontactwithallfamilymembers
(underlineintheoriginal).b.InthefirstweekonJune,2010,alsoDrorZernikandUriZerniksigned
affidavitsinsupportofRafaelZernik'saffidavit.c.Incontrast,receiptsfromtheHebrewUniversity'
guesthouseBelgiumHouseshowsthatonMay1113,2010,IsharedaroomwithUriZernik,while
bothofuswereguestsofmyUncle(myMother'sbrother).
ThetruefactsinthismatterarethatthethreeofthemRafaelZernik,DrorZernikandUriZernik
secretlycommencedthecourtaction,hidingitfrommyUncleandfromme,inordertoexecute
realestatefraud.Suchfactswerediscoveredonlymonthslater,andwerebroughttothe
knowledgeofEsperanzaAlon,butsherefusedtotakeanycorrectivemeasures.
OnJune1,2010RafaelZernikfiledafalseandmisleadingaffidavit,statingthat
mywhereaboutsisunknown(Figure1).Thetruefactsinthismatterarethathe
andmanyothermembersofmyfamilyknewwellthatIwaslivinginIsrael,andI
alsovisitedtheirhome,keptincontactwiththem,particularlywithmyUncle(my
Mother'sbrother)andmycousin,inwhosehomesIstayedimmediatelyafter
returningtoIsrael.WithUriZernikIsharedaroomintheHebrewUniversity's
guesthouseBelgiumHouse,wherebothstayedasguestsofmyUncle(Figure
1).
Similarly,theaffidavitstatesthatmyUncle,myMother'sbrotherconsentedtothe
request,buthedidnotknowofitatallformanymonths,untilIinformedhimof
thatmatter.Hewasalsosurprisedthatnoconservatorhadbeenappointedyears
earlier,whenmymotherhadbecomeincompetent.
InthefirstweekofJune,2010DrorZernikandUriZernikfiledinCourt
affidavitsinsupportofRafaelZernik'saffidavit(Figure1).
Whenthefalseaffidavitswerediscovered,monthslater,Ifileddetailedevidence
oftheirfalsehoodwithEsperanzaAlon.EsperanzaAlonrefusedtoinitiateany
correctivemeasures.
3. OnOctober18,2010SocialWorkerReportwasfiledincourt.Intheprocessof
preparingtheReport,shediscoveredthatIlivedinIsrael,andaskedmyopinion.
ThatwasthemannerinwhichIfirstherinlateSeptember2010ofthecourt
processunderway.AsIdiscoveredmuchlater,theSocialWorkerlaterfileda
Reportthatincludedfalsestatements,whichmayhavebeenplantedbyRafael
ZernikandDrorZernik.Forexample:TheReportfalselystatesthatIjustarrived
29/48
inIsrael.Likewise,theReportisuntrueregardingthenumberofyearsthatmy
motherwasincompetentpriortotheopeningofthecourtprocess.
Regardless,theSocialWorker'sReportalsodocumentsthefraudintention,since
theSocialWorkerstatesthatRafaelZerniksaysthatthegoaloftheprocesswas
toexecuterealestatetransactionsinmyMother'sname.
DetaileddocumentationofthefalsestatementsintheSocialWorker'sReportwas
filedwithEsperanzaAlonmuchlater,aftertheReportwasdiscovered.Alon
refusedtopermitcorrectionoftheReport.
4. OnNovember13,2010JudgeEhudRekem(sinceretired)issuedDecree
AppointingaConservator(Figure2)whichshouldbedeemeda
sham/simulatedcourtrecordforthefollowingreasons:
(a)TheDecreewasissuedwithnoserialnumber,inviolationofexplicitprovision
oftheRegulations.[12]
(b)ItstitlefailstoconformwiththeexplicittitleintheRegulations:Decree
AppointingaConservatorpursuanttotheLegalCompetencyandConservatorship
Act(1962).
(c)ChiefClerkoftheHaifaMagistrateCourtrefusedtodulyissuecertification
TrueCopyoftheOriginalonsuchdecree,regardlessofrepeatrequests.
(d)Evenyearsaftersuchdecreewasissued,andafterrepeatinquirieswiththe
AdministrationofCourts,myMotherhasneverbeenregisteredpursuanttothis
DecreeintheCentralRegistryofLegallyIncompetentPersons,asexplicitly
prescribedbytheRegulations(Article16).TheRegulationssay:Adjacenttothe
JerusalemDistrictCourt,anofficeshallbemaintainedfortheCentralRegistryof
LegallyIncompetentPersons,andanypersonshallbepermittedtoinspectit.
InvestigationrevealedthatnosuchofficeexistedadjacenttotheJerusalem
DistrictCourt.EmployeeoftheOfficeoftheClerkoftheJerusalemDistrictCourt
explainedthatitwasanerrorintheRegulations,andthattheRegistryOffice
wasmaintainedbytheAdministrationofCourtsinJerusalem.Investigation
revealedthatpublicaccesstothepurportedRegistrationOfficeinthe
AdministrationofCourtsisdenied,anditishighlydoubtedthatanysuchCentral
Registryexistsatall.Repeatrequests(includingFreedomofInformation)
attemptingtodiscoveranyevidenceofsuchCentralRegistrywereleft
unanswered.Suchcircumstancesshouldbedeemedseriousviolationoftherights
ofallconservateesinIsrael.
DecisionoftheOmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryintheJudgeVardaAlshech
FabricatedProtocolsscandal(AttachmentsB,C)clarifiesconditions,relativeto
theadministrationofelectroniccourtfilesinNetHaMishpat(newcase
managementandelectronicfilingsystemofthedistrictandmagistratecourts)
today:
(a)Thatthesignatures,whichappearondecisionrecordsinNetHaMishpatare
invalidgraphicsignatures.
12 RegulationsofLegalCompetencyandConservatorship (1970),Appendix,FormNo1
30/48
(b)Thatthevalidsignaturesareelectronicsignatures,pursuanttotheElectronic
SignatureAct(2001),buttheyareinaccessiblebyparties,counsel,andthepublic
atlarge.
(c)Thatdecisionsthatarenotelectronicallysigned,holdnotfinalityandare
invalid,aremerelydrafts.Withit,theOmbudsman'sdecisiondocumentsthat
judgesroutinelyissueunsigneddecisions.
(d)Thatdecisionsthatarenotelectronicallysignedmustnotbecertified,True
CopyoftheOriginal.
(e)Thatcourtemployees,withnodueauthorityandnotrainingroutinelycertify
unsigneddecisions,TrueCopyoftheOriginal.
ThecomplaintagainstJudgeVardaAlshechwasbasedontwoprotocolrecords
VersionAandVersionB(AttachmentC).TheOmbudsmanclarifiesinhis
decisionthatbothrecordsareunsigned,andthatbothareinvalid,regardlessof
thefactthatbothshownumerousgraphicsignatures.Moreover,the
Ombudsmannotesinhisdecisionthatthecertification,TrueCopyofthe
Original,onVersionAisunlawfulandinvalidaswell.
Pertainingtothismatter,itshouldbenotedthatEsperanzaAlondeniedmy
accesstoinspecttheauditdataoftheelectronicrecords,includingEhudRekem's
Decree,whichwereissuedinthecourtfiles,inwhichinstantcomplaintoriginates
(inparticularelectronicsignaturedata,iftheyexistatall).
Regardless,thepersistentrefusalbytheChiefClerk,whoistheonewhois
authorizedbylawtocertify,TrueCopyoftheOriginal,leadstotheconclusion
thattherecordsarelikelytobesham/simulatedcourtrecords,includingthe
DecreebyEhudRekem.
31/48
Figure2.Inre:ConservateeRS(18290610):Sham/simulatedNovember13,2013DecreeAppointinga
ConservatorbyJudgeEhudRekem.TheDecreefailstocomplywiththeRegulationsofLegal
CompetencyandConservatorship(1970),Appendix,Form1,since:Itfailstoshowaserialnumber,its
titleisinvalid,itwasneverenteredintheCentralRegistryofLegallyIncompetentPersons,andChief
ClerkoftheHaifaMagistrateCourtpersistentlyrefusedtodulycertifyit,TrueCopyoftheOriginal ,
evenafterrepeatrequests.
32/48
5. InSeptemberOctober,2011onceIdiscoveredthattheacourtprocesswas
ongoing(buthavenotyetinspectedthecourtfilerecords),anotherallegedfraud
attemptwasconductedoutsidetheCourtbyRafaelZernik,DrorZernik,and
AttorneyOferBenAri.Thethreeofthemjointlytriedtoconvincemetoassentto
asham/simulatedrealestateagreement,wherebyownershipofanapartment,
whichwashalfownedbymyMother,wouldbetransferredtome.
SuchagreementwaspresentedtomeasprematureexecutionofmyMother'swill.
Therefore,itmaybeconcludedthatmyMother'swilllistedmeasoneofthe
inheritorsofrealestatethatsheowned,andwhichallegedlywasthetargetofthe
fraudhere.
However,suchagreementwasofferedtomewhilerefusingtopermitmeto
inspecttheproperty,refusingtopermitmetoseetheappraisaloftheproperty,
refusingtopermitmetoinformthetenantsthatownershipwastransferredto
me,andrefusaltoprovidemewithkeystotheproperty,evenafterIwouldhave
gainedownershipofit...Therentalincomewasnotgoingtomeeither.Irefused
tosignsuchagreement.
Documentationofsuchfraudattemptwasfiledincourt,butEsperanzaAlon
refusedtotakeanycorrectiveactions...
6. OnJanuary1,2012oncetheattempttoinducemetoassenttothe
sham/simulatedrealestateagreement,outlinedabove,failed,AttorneyOferBen
ArifiledRequestforApprovalofGiftAgreement,whosepurposewastotransfer
myMother'spropertytoothers.Theevidenceindicatesthatsuchmotionprocess:
(a)Seriousperversionofcourtrecordswasperpetratedintheelectroniccourtfile
inNetHaMishpat:Theoriginalmotionpaper,filedbyAttorneyOfferBenAri,
canstillbeviewedunderapostitdecisionbyJudgeEhudRekem.However,the
Motionpaper,nowappearinginNetHaMishpatisanaltogetherdifferentpaper.
ItshouldbenotedthatGooglesearchindicatesthatOferBenAriismarriedtoan
employeeoftheCourt...
(b)TheMotiontoapprovetherealestatetransferwasconductedbyEhudRekem
withouttheknowledgeoftheMinistryofJusticeCounselfortheAttorney
Generaloutofcompliancewiththelaw.
Idiscoveredthemattermonthslater,throughinspectionofcourtrecords.WhenI
discoveredthematter,IapproachedtheCounseloftheMinistryofJustice,and
shefiledanoticeinCourtwithEsperanzaAlon(whobythenheldthecourtfile),
indicatingthattheentireMotionandapprovaloftherealestatetransactionwas
carriedoutwithoutherknowledge,outofcompliancewiththelaw.
EsperanzaAlonrefusedtoinitiateanycorrectiveactions.
7. OnJanuary13,2013Imaterializedthefirstinspectionoftheoriginalcourtfile,
Inre:ConservateeRS(18290610),intheOfficeoftheClerk,HaifaMagistrate
Court.Theinspectionledtodiscoveryofclearevidenceoftheallegedfraud
perpetratedthere.
33/48
RafaelZernikexpressedonseveraloccasionshisdismayofthefactthatI
inspectedthecourtfile.Inhisopinion,Iwassupposedtorelyonlyonthe
informationthathehadprovidedme...
OnceIdiscoveredtherecords,RafaelZernikchangedhiscounsel,andhired
AttorneyAmosSadikatoreplaceOferBenAri.Additionalallegedfraud,
perpetratedbyAttorneyAmosSadikaisoutlinedbelow.
Inparallel,RafaelZernikcomplainedtomeregardingtheexorbitantfeescharged
byAttorneySadikaforhisspecialservices...andheappearedtoblamemeforit...
8. OnMarch13,2013AttorneyAmosSadikafileasCounselforRafaelZernikand
purportedCounselforDrorZernikRequesttoAddaConservatorformyMother
(Figure3).ConductofEsperanzaAlonsurroundingthisRequestprovidessome
ofthebestevidenceformyclaimsofcriminalitybyEsperanzaAlonconductof
sham/simulatedcourtprocessandissuanceofsham/simulatedcourtrecords:
TheRequestwasinitiallyfiledundertheoriginalcourtfilenumber(182906
10).However,atthisstage,EsperanzaAlonactedinpatentlyunreasonable
mannerforacompetentandhonestjudge.Thelawexplicitlyprovidesthatcourt
filesintheFamilyCourtsbeunited.(13)However,EsperanzaAlonpurportedto
closetheoriginalcourtfileInre:ConservateeRS(18290610),andopened
withnofoundationinthelawanothercourtfileInre:ConservateeRS(25607
0313).TheRequestforAddingaConservatorwasoriginallyfiledbyAttorney
AmosSadikaundertheoriginalcourtfileandenteredinit.However,ahand
writtenalterationshowsthatitwastransferredtothenewcourtfile(Figure3).
13TheFamilyCourtAct(1995),Article6(a)says:CombiningCourtFiles(a)Incaseseveralcomplaintswere
filedinafamilymatterinthesamejudicialdistrict,suchcomplaintsshallbejointlyreviewed,inaFamily
MattersCourtdecidedbythePresidingJudgeoftheMagistrateCourt...
34/48
Figure3.Inre:ConservateeRS(256070313):RequestforAddingaConservatorforthe
Conservatee,filedonMarch13,2013byAttorneyAmosSadika.AttorneySadikainitiallyfiledthe
RequestundertheConservatee'soriginalcourtfile(18290610),andlistedRafaelZernikasRequester
andCounselfortheMinistryofJusticeasRespondent.However,EsperanzaAlon,aspartofan
elaborateallegedfraudscheme,purportedtoclosetheoriginalcourtfile(18290610)withno
foundationinthelaw,andopenedanewcourtfileforthesameConservatee(256070313),then
registeredvariousfamilymembersaspartieswithnofoundationinthelaw,andconducted
sham/simulatedprocedures.
9. OnMarch24,2013CounselfortheMinistryofJusticeAttorneyGeneralfiledin
courtInterimResponse,underthenewcourtfile,whichsaysthatthetwocourt
filesshouldbeunited.[14]
OnMarch28,2013EsperanzaAlonissuedasham/simulatedPostitDecision
onthefaceoftheMinistryofJusticeAttorneyGeneralCounsel'sInterim
Response,wheresheignoredtheopinionoftheCounsel,thatthetwocourtfiles
shouldbeunited.[13]
14 2013032420130324InRE:RS(256070313)IntermediateResponsebyCounselfortheAttorneyGeneral,
opiningcombiningofthenewlyopenedcourtfile256070313 withtheoriginalcourtfile18290610
35/48
SuchmaneuverbyEsperanzaAlonformedthebasisforaseriesofadditionallater
acts,whichIclaimarefraudaswell,including:
(a)MyregistrationasapartyinthenewcourtfileRespondentwithno
foundationinthelaw.
(b)Issuingsham/simulated,differentandcontradictorydecisionsregardingthe
dateofthehearingontheRequest.
(c)RefusaltorejectordemandcorrectionofafalseaffidavitintheRequestfor
AddingaConservator.
(d)Conductofasham/simulatedhearingontheRequest,whichwasentered
underthenewopencourtfile,whileahearingwasenteredintheCalendarofthe
Courtundertheold,purportedlyclosedcourtfile.
(e)Issuanceofasham/simulatedprotocolonthehearingontheRequest.
(f)Denialofmyaccesstoinspectboththeoldandthenewcourtfiles.
10. Followingthesham/simulatedMarch28,2013PostitDecisionbyEsperanza
Alon,AttorneyAmosSadikastartedreferringtomeasRespondentinthis
request,withnofoundationinthelaw.Thelackoffoundationinthelawforsuch
conductwasalsolaterconfirmedbyCounselfortheMinistryofJustice.
AspartofhiscollusionwithEsperanzaAlonintheallegedfraud,AmosSadika
purportedtoserveonmetheRequestascommencingrecordforthenewcourt
file,butwithnosummons.[15]AccordingtoIsraelilaw,asisthecaseinother
nations,thesummonsestablishesthejurisdictionauthorityofthecourtonthe
partiesinagivenmater.Theopeningofacourtfilewithnosummonsiswell
knownworldwideasacardinalsignofconductofsham/simulatedcourtprocess.
Therefore,theentiresecondcourtfileshouldbedeemedsham/simulatedcourt
processfromitsonset.Thematterwasobvioustomealreadythen,andI
protestedtheallegedfraud.However,EsperanzaAlon,undertheguiseof
MagistrateCourtJudgecontinuedtheconductofthesham/simulatedcourt
process.
11. Moreover,regardlessofrepeatrequests,AttorneyAmosSadikanever
presentedhisCertificateofCounselforDrorZernik(hedidpresenttheCertificate
ofCounselforRafaelZernik).DrorZernikonhispartfailedtorespondona
registeredmail,senttohim,askinghimtoclarifywhetherAttorneySadika
operatesashislawfulCounselincourtinthismatter.AttorneySadikaalsonever
filedDrorZernik'sCertificateofCounselincourt,andEsperanzaAlonnever
askedhimtofileoneeither.
Withit,basedonconversationswithDrorZernik,RafaelZernik,andAttorney
AmosSadika,itbecameclearthatDrorZernikisthedrivingforcebehindthese
actions,andthathewastheoneoperatingAttorneyAmosSadika.Suchconduct
theappearanceofattorneyincourtwithnocertificateofcounsel,iswellknown
worldwideasacourtfraudmethodaswell.Itsgoalisusuallytoproduce
15RegulationsofCivilCourtProcedures(1984),Article20says:20.Summons,signedbytheClerkoftheCourt,
shallbeservedimmediatelyfollowingthefilingofthecomplainttoeachdefendant,togetherwithacopyof
theComplaint.
36/48
plausibledeniabilityfortheperson,forwhoanattorneyisperpetratingfraudin
thecourt.
12. TheRequesttoAddaConservatorwaspurportedlybasedonafalseand
blatantlyforgedrecord,whichhadpurportedlybeensignedbymyMotherin
2008,yearsaftershehadbeendiagnosedasanAlzheimerpatient.Therecord
itselfwasreferencedintheRequest,filedbyAttorneyAmosSadika,andwasheld
byRafaelZernik.Thesignsofforgeryonitareobvious.However,therecord
wasneverfiledasanexhibitwiththeRequest,outofcomplianceofthelaw.[16]
Regardlessofnotice,whichIfiledwithEsperanzaAlonregardingthisalleged
fraud,whileitwasbeingperpetrated,sherefusedtoinitiateanycorrective
actions.
13. AtthesametimethatEsperanzaAlonwaslistingmeasapartyina
sham/simulatedcourtprocess,lackingfoundationinthelawoftheStateofIsrael,
shedeniedmyaccesstothecourtrecordsbothintheoldandthenewcourtfile.
SuchconductstandsinblatantlycontrarytotheRegulations.Suchconduct
(unlessinunusualcases,pertainingtonationalsecurity,etc)isalsoconsidered
seriousviolationofHumanRightsandtherightforDueProcess.Theregistration
ofapersonasaparty,withnofoundationinthelaw,whileconductingcourt
processagainsthimandhidingthecourtfilerecordsfromhim,alsoprovides
additionalevidenceforthefraudintent.
14. OnMarch17,2013EsperanzaAlonissuedtwosham/simulated,differentand
conflictingPostitDecisionsonthematterofhearingtheRequesttoAdda
Conservator(Figure4).Thismatterprovidesadditionalevidenceforfraudintent.
SuchPostitDecisionsshownoformofsignatureatall.
ThegoalofthePostitDecisionswastocompelmetoappearina
sham/simulatedcourthearing.TheRequesttoAddaConservatorwasentered
underthenewcourtfilenumber.Incontrast,thehearingwasenteredinthe
CourtCalendar(andeventuallyconducted)undertheoldcourtfilenumber,
whichhadbeenpurportedlyclosed,anditsdatewasscheduleinshorternotice
thanpermittedbylaw.TheCalendaroftheCourtisoneofthefundamental
BooksofCourtinanycompetentcourt,anditsholdssupremesignificancein
determiningthevalidityandauthorityofcourthearings.Therefore,theconduct
ofahearingunderthewrongcourtfilenumber,asdonehere,shouldbedeemed
seriousperversionofcourtprocess.
16RegulationsofCivilCourtProcedures(1984),Article75says:
75.Partiesshallindicateintheirclaimsrecord,orinalistattachedtoit,whattherecordsarethattheclaims
arebasedon,andshallattachthemtothetotheclaimsrecord.
37/48
Figure4.Inre:ConservateeRS(256070313):ThreePostitDecision,whichwerereceivedbymailon
March21,2013:ThethreePostitDecisionswereenteredunderthenewcourtfilenumber,likethe
RequestforAddingaConservator,whichisthesubjectmatter,Butthedecisionssetahearingon
theRequestundertheoldcourtfileInre:ConservateeRS(18290610),whichhadpurportedlybeen
closed.
AReceivedbycertifiedmailfromAttorneyAmosSadika,accompaniedbynoauthenticationletter
atall:DecisionofMarch17,2013,incourtfile256070313byJudgeEsperanzaAlonTheRequester
shallservetheRequestontheResponderandonJosephZernikfortheirresponsewithin60days
fromthedateofservice.TheOfficeoftheClerkshallservetheRequesterandSocialWorkerper
CivilProcedures.
BReceivedbycertifiedmailfromAttorneyAmosSadika,accompaniedbynoauthenticationletter
atall:DecisionofMarch17,2013,inFile256070313byJudgeEsperanzaAlonTheRequestershall
servetheRequestontheResponderandonJosephZernikfortheirresponsewithin45days.Absent
agreement.therequestshallbereviewedtogetherwithRequeststhatwerescheduledforFile1829
0610onApril4,2013,12:00noon.TheOfficeoftheClerkshallservetheRequesterandSocialWorker
perCivilProcedure.
CReceivedbycertifiedmailfromtheOfficeoftheClerk,accompaniedbyanunsigned
authenticationletterbyanunnamedclerk:DecisionofMarch17,2013,incourtfile256070313by
JudgeEsperanzaAlonTheRequestershallservetheRequestontheResponder[Ministryof
Welfarejz]andonJosephZernikfortheirresponsewithin60daysfromthedateofservice.The
OfficeoftheClerkshallservetheRequesterandSocialWorkerperCivilProcedures.
AttorneyAmosSadikaclaimedinwritingthatDecisionAwasvoid,andDecisionBwasthe
corrected,validdecisioninthismatter.Courtemployeewithnoauthorityatallissuedaletter
statingthatDecisionBwasvoid,andDecisionAwasthecorrected,validdecision.EsperanzaAlon
refusedtoanswer:Whichofthetworecordsisvoid?Whichofthetworecordsisvalid?Esperanza
Alonalsodeniedaccesstotheauditdata,whichwouldshowthetimeofissuingeachrecord,and
howtheycametoAttorneySadika'shands...EventuallyEsperanzaAlonconducteda
sham/simulatedcourthearingonApril04,2013,accordingtoDecisionB,undertheold,purportedly
closedcourtfileandissuedonitasham/simulatedprotocolrecord...whichretroactivelystatedthat
itwasaninformalhearing...
ChiefClerkIsraelHenoftheHaifaMagistrateCourt,refusedtocertifyeitherofthecourtdecisions,
TrueCopyoftheOriginal.
15. RegardingthedifferentandcontradictoryMay17,2013PostitDecisions
(Figure4):
(a)AttorneyAmosSadikaclaimedinwritingthatDecisionAwasvoid,and
DecisionBwasthecorrected,validdecisioninthismatter.
(b)CourtemployeewithnoauthorityatallissuedaletterstatingthatDecisionB
wasvoid,andDecisionAwasthecorrected,validdecision.
(c)AndEsperanzaAlon?EsperanzaAlonrefusedtoanswer:Whichofthetwo
recordsisvoid?Whichofthetworecordsisvalid?EsperanzaAlonalsodenied
accesstotheauditdata,whichwouldshowthetimeofissuingeachrecord,and
howtheycametoAttorneySadika'shands...EventuallyEsperanzaAlonconducted
asham/simulatedcourthearingonApril04,2013,accordingtoDecisionB,under
theold,purportedlyclosedcourtfile,andissuedonitasham/simulatedprotocol
record...whichretroactivelystatedthatitwasaninformalhearing...
(d)ChiefClerkIsraelHenoftheHaifaMagistrateCourt,refusedtocertifyeither
ofthecourtdecisions,TrueCopyoftheOriginal.
16. OnApril4,2013EsperanzaAlonissuedasham/simulatedprotocol,
pertainingtothesham/simulatedhearingontheRequesttoAddaConservator
(Figure5):
38/48
(a)Thesham/simulatedprotocolwasissuedundertheoldcourtfileInre:
ConservateeRS(18290610),whiletheRequestwasenteredunderthenewcourt
fileInre:ConservateeRS(256070313).
(b)Inthebodyoftheprotocol,EsperanzaAlonretroactivelystatedthatthe
hearingwasinformali.e.,notinaccordancewiththelawoftheStateofIsrael.
39/48
a)
40/48
b)
Figure5:Sham/simulatedApril04,2013protocolbyEsperanzaAlonofthesham/simulatedcourt
hearing,conductedbyEspranzaAlonundertheguiseofherauthorityasaJudge.a)Page1
showstheregistryofvariousfamilymembers,includingme,asRequesterswithnofoundationin
thelaw.DrorZernik,whoinitiatedtheprocessandwaspresentinthehearing,wasnotlistedas
present(apparentlypartoftheongoingefforttoprovidehimplausibledeniabilityforhiscentralrole
intheallegedfraud)andanotherfamilymember,whowasnotpresent,waslistedaspresent
instead.b)Page3showsasham/simulatedDecision,aninvalidgraphicsignature,and
certification,TrueCopyoftheOriginal,whichshouldbedeemedforgery.Page3alsosays:The
41/48
OfficeoftheClerkshallservemyinstantdecisiononDrJosephZernikandfromnowonno
accesstorecordsininstantcourtfileshallbepermittedabsentadvancepermissionbythe
Court.Theinstructiontoserveasham/simulatedcourtdecisionindicatesthefraudintentionby
EsperanzaAlon,whooperatedundetheguiseofherauthorityasJudge.Theinstructionalso
indicatesherintention,whichshelaterenforced,todenymyaccesstoinspectacourtfile,whereI
purportedlywaspartytothecourtprocess.
Itshouldbenotedthatthesham/simulatedprotocolwasissuedundertheold,firstcourtfile(182906
10),whichhadpurportedlybeenclosed,althoughthehearingpurportedtobeontheMotionto
AddaConservator,whichwasenteredunderthesecond,newcourtfile(256070313).
Allthreepagesofthesham/simulatedprotocolbearthewatermarkNotSignedYet.The
OmbudsmanoftheJudiciarydecisionintheVardaAlshechFabricatedProtocolsscandalexplicitly
refertosuchwatersign,andstatesthatitindicatesthattherecordisnotelectronicallysignedand
isinvalid.Withit,theOmbudsmannotesthatthejudgesactedtohavethewatersignremoved
fromNetHaMishpatsystem,claimingthatitinterfereswiththeirwork,andsinceitsremoval,thereis
nowayfortheparties,counsel,andthepublictodistinguishbetweenanauthentic,validcourt
recordandaninvalidsham/simulatedcourtrecord.TheOmbudsmanalsorecommendedthatthe
watersignberestored,andaskedthattheAdministrationofCourtsupdatehimonimplementation
ofhisrecommendation.However,theevidenceindicatesthatsuchrecommendationhasnever
beenimplemented...
TheVardaAlshechFabricatedProtocolsscandaleruptedalmosttwoyearspriortothedateofthe
April04,2013hearing,andtheOmbudsmandecisionwasrenderedaboutayearpriortothehearing
date.Regardless,EsperanzaAlondidnothesitatetoconductsuchfraudwithincrediblechutzpa.
(c)AllAllthreepagesofthesham/simulatedprotocolbearthewatermarkNot
SignedYet.TheOmbudsmanoftheJudiciarydecisionintheVardaAlshech
FabricatedProtocolsscandalexplicitlyrefertosuchwatersign,andstatesthatit
indicatesthattherecordisnotelectronicallysignedandisinvalidmerelya
draft.[17]
(d)Variousfamilymembers,includingme,werelistedasRequesterswithno
foundationinthelaw.DrorZernik,whoinitiatedtheprocess,wasincontrastnot
listed...
(e)Thenamesoftheparticipantsinthishearingwerepervertedintheprotocol.
EsperanzaAlonfailedtoregisterthepresenceofDrorZernik(again,likelytobe
partoftheeffortstoprovidehimplausibledeniabilityofhiscentralroleinthe
allegedfraud),andlistedinsteadthenameofafamilymember,whowasnot
presentthere.EsperanzaAlonrefusedtocorrectsuchperversions(seebelow).
TheVardaAlshechFabricatedProtocolsscandaleruptedalmosttwoyears
earlier,andtheOmbudsmanoftheJudiciarydecisiononthematterwasissued
almostayearearlier.Regardless,EsperanzaAlondidnothesitatetoengagein
conductthatshouldbedeemedfraudwithincrediblechutzpah.
17. OnApril29,2013IfiledwithEsperanzaAlonNoticeofErroneousand
MisleadingProtocol.
17Withit,theOmbudsmannotesthatthejudgesactedtohavethewatersignremovedfromNet
HaMishpatsystem,claimingthatitinterfereswiththeirwork,andsinceitsremoval,thereisnowayforthe
parties,counsel,andthepublictodistinguishbetweenanauthentic,validcourtrecordandaninvalid
sham/simulatedcourtrecord.TheOmbudsmanalsorecommendedthatthewatersignberestored,and
askedthattheAdministrationofCourtsupdatehimonimplementationofhisrecommendation.However,the
evidenceindicatesthatsuchrecommendationhasneverbeenimplemented...
42/48
OnMay6,2013EsperanzaAlonissuedyestanothersham/simulatedPostit
Decision(Figure6).
ThePostitDecisionssaysinpart:Aperson,whoisnotalegalscholarwould
behardpressedtorepresenthimselfandmasterthemysteriesofcourt
procedure...
EsperanzaAlonparticularlyrefusedtocorrecttheprotocolregardingtheomission
ofDrorZernik'spresenceinit,usingafalsestatement:Asfarasscribe'serrors
weremadeinaclosedcourtprocess,Idonotfinditnecessary,atthisstage,to
examinethemindetail...(ThehearingwaspurportedtobeontheMotionto
AddaConservator,whichwasenteredinthenew,secondcourtfile,andwasstill
purportedlypendingbeforetheCourt).
Figure6:May6,2013sham/simulatedPostitDecisionbyEsperanzaAlon,undertheguiseofher
authorityasJudge.Thedecisionwasissuedfollowingmynoticeoftheperversionsinthe
sham/simulatedApril04,2013Protocol.Itshouldbenotedthatthissham/simulatedpostitdecision
wasalsoissuedundertheold,firstcourtfile(18290610),whichhadpurportedlybeenclosed,
althoughthesubjectmatterofthedecisionandtheprotocolistheMotiontoAddaConservator,
whichwasenteredunderthenew,secondcourtfile(256070313)aspartofthenumerouspervesions
inthesecourtfiles..
18. OnMay22,2013InresponsetotheMay6,2013falseandmisleading,
sham/simulatedPostitDecision,IfiledwithEsperanzaAlonastatement,
detailingherconduct,underthetitle:JudgeEsperanzaAlonMsMysteriesof
CourtProcedure,orperverterofcourtprocesswithimpunity?(AttachmentD).
EsperanzaAlondeleteditfromthedocket...
19. OnJuly3,2013inresponsetomyRepeatRequesttoInspectCourtFile,
AttorneyAmosSadikafiledonbehalfofhisclientRafaelZernikandhispurported
clientDrorZernikResponsebytheRespondersonRepeatRequesttoInspect
43/48
CourtFileunderthenewcourtfileInre:ConservateeRS(256070313).[18]It
remainsunclear,whyhere,ofallpapers,AttorneySadikadecidedtofinallyexpose
DrorZernikasakeyperpetrator...Iwaspurportedlyapartyinthiscourtfile,
accordingtoEsperanzaAlonandAttorneyAmosSadika.Accordingtothe
RegulationsoftheCourtsInspectionofCourtFiles(2003),apartyhastherightto
inspectacourtfilewithoutevenfilingarequest.[19]AndtheSupremeCourtruled
thattherighttoinspectisafundamentalprincipleinanydemocraticregime...
constitutional,suprastatutory...However,myaccesstoinspectthecourtfilewas
denied,andthereforeIhadtofilearequest.
AttorneyAmosSadikaobjectedonbehalfofRafaelZernikandDrorZerniktomy
inspectionofthecourtfile,stating:Wearedealingwithacantankerousand
harassingrequest(oneofmany...)[20]
Myaccesstothecourtfilescontinuestobedenied.
20. OnAugust22,2013inviewofincreasingriskofretaliatoryactionsbythe
Courtforexposingitsconduct,andinformalinformation,whichIreceived,that
thematterwasforwardedtotheTelAvivPolice,IfiledaRequestforProtection
withtheGermanConsulinIsrael(AttachmentD).
21. OnSeptember17,2013EsperanzaAlonissuedasham/simulatedDecree
AppointingaConservator,whichliketheoneissuedbyEhudRekemfailstoto
complywiththeRegulations,andwhichtheChiefClerkoftheHaifaMagistrate
Courtrefusestocertify,TrueCopyoftheOriginal.
EsperanzaAlon'sDecreeswasalsoneverregisteredintheCentralRegistryof
LegallyIncompetentPersonsoftheAdministrationofCourts,asprescribedbythe
Regulations...
Onthiscourtrecord,thepartiesnameswereagainperverted,andlistedwithno
foundationinthelaw.Here,DrorZernikandIwerelistedtogetheras
Responders,andAttorneyAmosSadikawaslistedasCounselforbothofus,as
wellasCounselforRequesterRafaelZernik...
EsperanzaAlondeniedaccesstotheelectronicsignaturedataoftherecordsin
thesecourtfiles,andtherefore,thereisnowaytoascertainthattheDecreeis
signedatall...However,givenChiefClerkIsraelHen'spersistentrefusaltocertify
1820130703InRE:RS(256070313)Requestforexemplarypunitivemeasures,filedunderthetitle,
ResponsebytheRespondersonRequesttoInspectCourtRecords
19TheRegulationsoftheCourtsInspectionofCourtFiles(2003)say:
3.Apartyispermitted,aftercompletingtheNoticeofInspection,pursuanttoForm1in
theAppendix,toinspectthecourtfileinwhichheisaparty,unlessitislawfully
prohibited.
4.(a)Anypersonispermittedtorequestthecourttoinspectacourtfile(hereinafter
RequesttoInspect),unlesstheinspectionislawfullyprohibited.
20 2013070320130703InRE:RS(256070313)Requestforexemplarypunitivemeasures,filed
underthetitle,ResponsebytheRespondersonRequesttoInspectCourtRecords
44/48
it,TrueCopyoftheOriginal,onemayconcludethatitisunsigned,
sham/simulatedcourtrecordaswell.
22. Regardlessofrepeatrequests,Ihaveneversucceededinobtainingalawful
certification,TrueCopyoftheOriginal,byChiefClerkIsraelHenonanyofthe
recordsineithercourtfile,pertainingtotheConservatee.
Onmyrepeatrequest,followingtheappointmentofanewPresidingJudge
InasSalameh,Ireceivedaresponsefromhisoffice,statingthatcertificationsby
theChiefClerkareprovidedonlyforuseabroad.
Itremainsincomprehensible,howthePresidingJudgeinventedsuchprovision.
Regardless,IthenfiledarequestforcertificationoftherecordsbytheChiefClerk
foruseabroad.ChiefClerkIsraelHenneverrespondedonthatrequesteither.
However,duringoneofmyvisitstofilepapersintheHaifaMagistrateCourtI
wascalledtoChiefClerkIsraelHen'soffice,notbymyinitiative,butbyhis.Israel
Heninformedmethathewouldneverrespondonanyofmyrequests,sinceIwas
tryingtobuildacaseonhim...
23.EsperanzaAlon'sallegedfraudintentioncanbeconcludedfromtheplethoraof
perversionsofcourtrecordsandcourtproceduresinthecourtfilespertaining
toConservateeRS,onlysomeofwhichwereoutlinedhere.
Additionally,theallegedfraudintentioncanbeconcludedfromtheunilateral
effectsofsuchperversions,andfromherpersistentrefusaltocorrectanyofthe
perversionsafternoticewasgiven.
Hererraticconductinthesecourtfilesstandsinstarkcontrastwitharecent
mediareport,whichreadlikeaPRrelease,whereJudgeEsperanzaAlonwas
commendedforherattentiontodetailsincourt...[21]
21 20160316SummaryJudgment:EsperanzaAlon_News1
http://www.news1.co.il/Archive/0024D11184400.html
45/48
Figure7:Sham/simulatedSeptember17,2013DecreeAppointingaConservatorbyEsperanza
Alon.LiketheNovember13,2013DecreebyEhudRekem(Figure2),itfailstocomplywiththeexplicit
provisionsoftheRegulations.ChiefClerkoftheHaifaMagistrateCourtIsraelHenpersistently
refusedtoissuecertification,TrueCopyoftheOriginalonthisdecree.Thecertification,which
doesappearonthisrecord,shouldbedeemedfraudandforgery,sincethenameandtrue
positionofthesignerfailtoappearontherecord(seeAttachmentsB,C).Thestampandsignature
onthecertificationappearsidenticaltothethatappearonthesham/simulatedApril04,2013
protocol.TheDecreealsostatesclosingofthesecond,newcourtfile,indisregardofthelaw.On
thisdecree,AttorneySadikaappearsasCounselforboththeRequesterRafaelZernikandthe
46/48
RespondentDrorZernik,butwithouteverfilingCertificateofCounselforDrorZernik.
E.Filingofadditionalevidence
Inmypossessionarenumerousotherrecords,whichdocumentthefraudby
EsperanzaAloninvariousstagesofthesham/simulatedcourtprocess,whichisthe
subjectofinstantcomplaint,butwerenotdetailedhereforbrevitysake.Ifandwhen
aninvestigationisinitiatedbytheIsraelPolice,pursuanttoaninstructionbythe
AttorneyGeneral,Iwouldbegladtoprovideadditionalevidenceandtestimonyas
partoftheinvestigation.
Today,May26,2016
___________________
JosephZernik,PhD
POBox33407,TelAviv6133301
Email:joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org
47/48

Attachments
A.JosephZernik,PhDBiosketch
'.
B.May31,2012decision(12/88/TelAvivDistrict)byOmbudsmanoftheJudiciary
pertainingtoJudgeVardaAlshech'sfabricatedprotocols
,(')2012,31(/88/12).
C.May22,2013Declaration,filedintheHaifaMagistrateCourt:JudgeEsperanza
Alon:Msmysteriesofcourtprocedure,orperverterofjusticewithimpunity...
:,2013,22.
...,
D.August22,2013requestforprotection,filedwiththeGermanConsultoIsrael.
,2013,22.
48/48
Joseph Zernik, PhD

"
PO Box 33407, Tel-Aviv, Israel
",33407 "
Fax: 077-3179186
2016-05-14 Biographical Sketch Joseph Zernik, PhD
In early 2016 Israli Broadcast Authority, Channel 1 Evening News (Mabat) declared
Dr Zernik, a Human Rights and social protest activist, the Happiest Street Person in
Tel-Aviv. In recent years he has gained recognition for his unique application of
data-mining and IT system analysis (e.g., courts, prisons, banks) in Human Rights.
Such research documented the important role that large-scale fraud in such systems
plays in the current financial crisis and in abuse of Human Rights by governments in
California, in the US, and in Israel.
Dr Zernik's reports in the area of IT systems and Human Rights were incorporated
into Universal Periodic Review reports of the United Nations Human Rights Council
regarding:
The United States (2010), with the note: Corruption of the courts and the legal
profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California;
The State of Israel (2013) with the note: Lack of integrity in the electronic records
of the supreme court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel, and
The United States (2015) with the note: HRA NGO recommended restoring the
integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with
the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.
A textbook on "Machine Learning" found Dr Zernik's application of data-mining to
Human Rights research among "Notable uses", and summarized it as follows: [i]
Data mining of government records - particularly records of the justice system (i.e.,
courts, prisons) - enables the discovery of systemic human rights violations in
connection to generation and publication of invalid or fraudulent legal records by
various government agencies. [ii,iii]
Dr Zernik also writes on current affairs, often for OpEdNews.com.

In recent years Dr Zernik has been active in the US and Israeli Social Protest
movements. As part of civil disobedience activity, Dr Zernik filed a number of
petitions in key courts in the US and Israel, challenging the integrity of such courts.
At the explicit request of key activists, and regardless of my strong reservations of
Wikipedia, I wrote the following two terms:
Rafi Rotem Hebrew Wikipedia
Roman Zadorov English Wikipedia
Today Dr Zernik is a permit holder for the Occupy Tel-Aviv camp, where he has
resided since 2012.
With it, Dr Zernik has also become the subject of various art and documentary
photographers in recent years.
1/15
As holder of the copyrights for the literary works of Yitzhaq Shami (1888-1949), Dr
Zernik has been instrumental in reclaiming Shami's deserved place in the history of
early modern Hebrew and Palestinian literature. Dr Zernik:
Brought to press The Mill of Life by Yitzhaq Sami in Hebrew (2015) won
the Masterpiece Book prize of the Israeli Ministry of Cultural Affairs;
Edited Nouvelles d'Hebron by Yitzhaq Shami in French (2006);
Co-edited Hebron Stories by Yitzhaq Shami in English (2000).
In a previous academic career, Dr Zernik primarily engaged in US government funded
bio-medical research, and his original PhD work pertained to cloning of the gene for
alkaline phosphatase an enzyme, which is a key marker of bone cells.
Online updated version: http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
Content:
1) Information Systems, E-government, Civil Society
2) Fine Literature
3) Natural Sciences
4) Videography, Photography
5) Links
1) Information Systems, E-government, Socio-economic Development and Civil

Society
2016
CommissionedtosubmitachapteroneCourtsandHumanRights
(subjecttopeerreview)foratextbookoneGovernment,tobepublishedby
Springer/
Zernik,J.WarrantlessimprisonmentofformerIsraeliPMEhudOlmert,
OpEdNews.com[iv]
Roman Zadorov, Wikipedia [v]
2015
Zernik,J.FraudulentNewITSystemsoftheIsraeliCourtsUnannounced
RegimeChange?Proceedingsofthe15thEuropeanConferenceone
Government(ECEG),UniversityofPortsmouth,UK,pp331340,2015.[ vi]
Zernik,J.TheZadorovAffair:FalsemurderconvictionofaUkrainian
exposedmassivecorruptionoftheIsraelijusticesystem,OpEdNews.com
[vii]
Zernik, J.PALESTINE:ChampagneinKafrDuma!Cheers!,OpedNews.com [viii]
Zernik, J. Jewish Valentine's in Jerusalem, OpEdNews.com [ix]
Zernik, J. Palestine: #SaveSusya, OpEdNews.com [x]
Zernik, J. Suicide of commander Efraim Bracha and "collapse" of the Israel
Police, OpEdNews.com [xi]
Zernik, J. The Rabin Assassination and Government Corruption in Israel,
OpEdNews.com [xii]
2/15
Zernik, J. When it comes to the First Amendment - Israel scores an "F",

OpEdNews.com [xiii]
Zernik, J., Human Right Alert's Submission to the Human Rights Council (HRC)
of the United Nations, for the 2015 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human
Rights in the United States, was incorporated into the HRC UPR Summary of
stakeholders' information under the section, Administration of justice, including
impunity and the rule of law:
57. HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the
courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such
systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.193 (Summary of
stakeholders' information, page 7) [xiv]
Zernik, J., Explosive corruption of the Israeli justice system is cured by gag
orders..., OpEdNews.com [xv]
Zernik, J., The Kabbalist and AG Loretta Lynch, OpEdNews.com [xvi]
Zernik, J., Fraudulent New IT Systems of the Israeli Courts Unannounced
Regime Change? Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on e-Government,
University of Portsmouth, UK, pp331-340, 2015. [xvii]
Zernik, J., IT systems of the US federal courts, justice, and governance, ICEG
2015, Zurich, Switzerland [xviii]
2014
Zernik, J., "Israeli Ombudsman refuses to accept whistle-blower complaint against
PM Netanyahu - smuggling, murder of a "source"" | OpEdNews.com [xix]
Zernik, J., "Israeli Ombudsman refuses to accept whistle-blower complaint against
PM Netanyahu - smuggling, murder of a "source"" | OpEdNews.com [xx]
Zernik, J., Human Right Alert's Submission filed with the Human Rights Council
(HRC) of the United Nations for the 2015 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of
Human Rights in the United States: Large-scale fraud in the IT system of the US
federal courts - unannounced regime change?", scheduled for review in May 2015.
[xxi]
Hannibal protocol, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, and the Jewish state | OpEdNews.com
[xxii]
Urgent international petition launched, to stop actions against homeless,
OccupyTel-Aviv | OpEdNews.com [xxiii]
ISRAEL: Attorneys from a non-existent law-firm appeared as Public Defenders for
whistle-blower Rafi Rotem... | OpEdNews.com [xxiv]
Large-scale fraud in IT systems of US courts - unannounced regime change |
OpEdNews.com [xxv]
The Harpaz document affair: IDF "Coup attempt", or a Shin-Bet sting operation? |
OpEdNews.com [xxvi]
Robbing Argentina in the US court in Manhattan - fraud of medieval style and
proportions | OpEdNews.com [xxvii]
ISRAEL: The killing of Lieutenant Hadar Goldin in Gaza - a government of
crooks! | OpEdNews.com [xxviii]
ISRAEL: The killing of Lieutenant Hadar Goldin and the "Hannibal protocol" |
OpEdNews.com [xxix]
What part of the missile attacks on Tel Aviv is an Israeli hoax? | OpEdNews.com
[xxx]
3/15
ARGENTINA: Again on the verge of economic collapse - again the victim of US

treachery! | OpEdNews.com [xxxi]
Israel: Fraud in the Supreme Court's computer systems - notice given to Supreme
Court Presiding Justice, Shin-Bet Head | OpEdNews.com [xxxii]
Request filed with Amnesty International in the case of persecuted Israeli Tax
Authority whistle-blower Rafi Rotem | OpEdNews.com [xxxiii]
ADL refuses to address evidence of racketeering in Bet Tzedek - the Los Angeles
"House of Justice" | OpEdNews.com [xxxiv]
Tel Aviv courtroom drama exposes new evidence of organized crime in highest
levels of government in Israel | OpEdNews.com [xxxv]
OccupyTLV: Tel Aviv Police Commander suspects criminality by police in the
camp | OpEdNews.com [xxxvi]
Zernik, J., ISRAEL: After years of abuse, Tax-Authority whistleblower Rafi Rotem
wins the right to be deposed by State Ombudsman | OpEdNews.com [xxxvii]
Zernik, J., PALESTINE: IDF soldiers protest campaign goes viral |
OpEdNews.com [xxxviii]
Zernik, J., Jerusalem: The Big Bongs Night - cannabis legalization demonstration |
OpEdNews.com [xxxix]
Zernik, J., ISRAEL: Israel places journalist under incommunicado confinement |
OpEdNews.com [xl]
Zernik, J., ISRAEL: New trial in the Rabin assassination case? | OpEdNews.com
[xli]
Zernik, J., Israel: Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher Grunis refuses to explain
the appointment of new "Chief Clerk"... | OpEdNews.com [xlii]
Zernik, J., ISRAEL: War hero Moti Ashkenazi+76 others versus the medieval
debtors' courts | OpEdNews.com [xliii]
Zernik, J., My red-head cousin! | OpEdNews.com [xliv]
Zernik, J., ISRAEL: The Shin-Bet-Judiciary Gang and organized crime |
OpEdNews.com [xlv]
Zernik, J., Occupy Tel-Aviv: Police, Municipality rampage in unique case of
government corruption, Human Rights abuse | OpEdNews.com [xlvi]
Zernik, J., Corpus Separatum Jerusalem and the middle-east peace process |
OpEdNews.com [xlvii]
Zernik, J., ISRAEL: Large-scale Fraud in the Supreme Court's Office of the Clerk
| OpEdNews.com [xlviii]
Zernik, J., Prayer for the peace and welfare of US anti judicial corruption activists
ROGER SHULER and BILL WINDSOR | OpEdNews.com [xlix]
2013
Zernik, J., Stanley Fischer's legacy in Israel - placing banks above the law,
subservient to the US surveillance apparatus | OpEdNews.com [l]
Zernik, J., ISRAEL: Nation hijacked by a Shin-Bet Judiciary Gang | OpEdNews.com
[li]
Filed criminal complaint and filed request with the Israeli Attorney General for
investigation of Presiding Justice of the Israeli Supreme Court Asher Grunis. [lii]
Zernik, J., Governor of Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer Acted As a Foreign Agent for
U.S. Security Apparatus Banking Cartel | OpEdNews.com [liii]
4/15
investigation of the Tel Aviv District Court, relative to allegations of selfimmolated, social protest activist Moshe Silman of obstruction of justice with
impunity. Launched public petition for the same. [liv]
Joseph Zernik v Minister of Justice Tzipi Livni and Director of the Courts Michael
Spitzer (2689/13) - Petition to the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, challenging
the integrity of the information systems of the Israeli courts, implemented in the
2000s. [lv]
Zernik, J., "IDF 8200 (cyberwar unit) is the best technology school on earth"
OpEdNews.com [lvi]
Zernik, J., Is Tel Aviv the Human Shield in a US-Israel Anti-Iran Gamble? Could
Israel Become the Next Iraq, of Self-will?| OpEdNews.com [lvii]
Zernik, J., Human Right Alert's Submission to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of
the United Nations, for the 2013 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human
Rights in the State of Israel was incorporated into the HRC UPR Professional Staff
Report (Paragraph 25) with a note, referring to Lack of integrity in the electronic
records of the Supreme Court, the district courts, and the detainees courts in
Israel. [lviii]
2012
investigation of Sarah Lifschitz Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of
Israel for fraud for occupying her office for over a decade with no lawful
appointment record. [lix]
Joseph Zernik v Governor of Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer (7650/12) - Petition to
the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, alleging that Stanley Fischer exchanged
his loyalty to the State of Israel and its laws with loyalty to another nation and its
law and/or loyalty to financial institutions and their interests. [lx]
Zernik, J. "Invalid Electronic Record Systems of the State and Federal US Courts
Enablers of Human Rights Abuse and the Financial Crisis", Cyberlaw 2013, France
accepted through peer-review, then rejected administratively. [lxi]
Zernik, J., " "Integrity, or Lack Thereof, of the Electronic Records of the Courts of
the State of Israel", Cyberlaw 2013, France accepted through peer-review, then
rejected administratively. [lxii]
Zernik, J., "Design and Operation of Information Systems of the US Courts are
Linked to Failing Banking Regulation", Data Analytics 2012, Barcelona, Spain
[lxiii]
Zernik, J., "Integrity, of lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts
of the State of Israel", Data Analytics 2012, Barcelona, Spain [lxiv]
Zernik, J., Evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the US courts
was submitted to the US House of Representatives Subcommittee on Judicial
reform, Chair by Representative Darrell Issa. [lxv]
2011
Paper, pertaining to the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court of the State
of Israel, [lxvi] was reviewed by Prof Eliyahu Shamir, Hebrew University Dept of
Computer Science, and forwarded to Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz with a request for
halachic opinion, whether the electronic conduct of the Supreme Court of Israel
amounts to Gneivat Daat Ha-Tzibur (public deception).
Participated and presented papers in the 16th World Criminology Congress in Kobe,
Japan [lxvii,lxviii]
5/15
Request filed for impeachment of Judge George OTool and Clerk Sarah Thornton,
both to the US District Court, District of Massachusetts. [lxix]
Papers accepted for the 16th World Congress of Criminology, Kobe, Japan,
describing invalid court computer systems in the US, California, and Israel, and
their significance in the current global economic crisis. [lxx,lxxi,lxxii]
Request filed for impeachment of Clerk of the US Supreme Court William Suter,
opining fraud in the online public access and case management system of the
highest court of the land, a national tribunal for protection of rights. [lxxiii,lxxiv ]
Motion for a Statement on the Record filed with the US Court of Appeals, 9th
Circuit, under Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al. The motion called upon the
Clerk of the US Court of Appeals to certify the validity of the dockets and records
in the appeal. In fact, the motion questioned the integrity of the public online
access and case management systems of the US court of appeals. [ lxxv]
Motion to Intervene was filed with the US Court of Appeals, 9t Circuit, under Log
Cabin Republicans v USA et al. The underlying case questioned the US Armed
Services policy of Dont Ask, Dont Tell. Dr Zerniks Motion never took a
position on the matter, but questioned validity of the US District Courts records in
the case, and asked the US Court of Appeals to issue declaratory mandates
pertaining to the implementation of the US district courts public online access and
case management systems (PACER and CM/ECF). [lxxvi,lxxvii]
2010
Zernik, J., Report filed as part of the first ever 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic
Review) of Human Rights in the United States, pertaining to Human Rights in Los
Angeles County, California. The report was incorporated into the staff report of the
Human rights Council of the United Nations with a reference to "corruption of the
courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in
California". [lxxviii]
Zernik, J., Report published in a peer-reviewed computer science journal, with an
Editorial Board listing scholars from six European nations and Canada, opining
fraud in the case management systems and online public access systems of the Los
Angeles County jails (Inmate Information Center) - enabling large-scale false
imprisonments under the pretense of lawfulness. [lxxix]
Report published in a peer-reviewed computer science journal (same as above),
opining fraud in the design of the case management and online public access
systems of the United States district courts (PACER and CM/ECF) - enabling the
conduct of pretense litigation. [lxxx]
Zernik, J., False imprisonment of former US prosecutor Richard Fine
OpEdnews.com. [lxxxi]
Zernik, J., Large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California,
OpEdnews.com [lxxxii]
2009
Report authored regarding Sustain, the case management system of the Superior
Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Upon review of the reports, a leading
international computer science scholar, Prof Eliyahu Shamir, provided a qualified
opinion, supporting Dr Zerniks claims of fraud in the design and operation of the
system, and calling on US computer science scholars to examine the integrity of
the system. [lxxxiii]
Opinion of fraud in specific litigation records of the Superior Court of California,
County of Los Angeles, was reaffirmed by the opinion of Fraud Expert James
6/15
Wedick, an FBI veteran, who had been decorated by the US Congress, US Attorney
General, and FBI Director for his accomplishments in crime prevention. [lxxxiv]
2008
Opinion of fraud in the underwriting and loan records of Countrywide Financial
Corporation and related persons, was supported by the opinion of Fraud Expert
Robert Meister, a Fraud Expert, who appears in courts across the United States.
[lxxxv, lxxxvi,lxxxvii]
2004
Opinion of fraud in the online public access of the California Commission on
Teachers Credentialing relative to teachers credentials in the Beverly Hills School
District was confirmed after two lengthy investigations by the California
Department of Education, which determined The School District is out of
compliance and in violation of the law.
1993
Zernik, J., L.A. story, The New Republic [lxxxviii]
2) Fine Literature
2015
Shami Y., The Mill of Life won the 2015 Masterpiece Book award by the
Minister of Culture.
Shami Y., The Mill of Life was published to critical acclaim my print and TV
media. The Hebrew Writers' Association held a special launch event for the book.
Schwartz, Y., and Zernik J., Brenner's curse continues to plague Shami to this
date, Haaretz Literary Supplement.[lxxxix]
2014
Shami Y., The Mill of Life agreement for an exhibit, concomitant with the
publication in 2015, under negotiations.
Shami Y., The Mill of Life agreement for a launch event, concomitant with the
publication in 2015, sponsored Tel-Aviv Municipality and the Hebrew Writers'
Association.
Shami Y., The Mill of Life - contract for publication of the Hebrew volume was
signed with the largest Israeli publisher - Zemorah, Bitan et al; publication
expected in 2015.
2013
Shamir E., and Zernik, J., A forgotten Hebrew author was adopted by the
Palestinians, Haaretz Literary Supplement - brought to press with introduction
Keeper of the Last Mosque, by Yitzhaq Shami (1888-1949) [xc]
2006
Zernik, J., (Editor, Epilogue author) Nouvelles dHebron by Yitzhaq Shami (18881949) by commission for Labor et Fides, the official press of the Calvinist church
of Switzerland. [xci, xcii]
2004
Following the publication of complete English translation of Hebron Stories,
Yitzhaq Shami was recognized by the Palestinian Academic Association as one of
the important Palestinian 20th century writers. With it, the author gained a unique
place in Middle-Eastern literature recognized by both Israel and Palestine as part
7/15
of their shared Modern literary heritage, and in 2010, the first English language
critical review volume dedicated to Shami was published. [xciii]
2000
Lazar M., and Zernik, J., (Editors) Hebron Stories by Yitzhaq Shami (1888-1949)
a volume of early Modern Middle-Eastern stories. The work won praises by the
Los Angeles Times [xciv] and also by Arabic Literature magazines. [xcv]
3) Natural Sciences
1988 PhD awarded from the University of Connecticut for research thesis
Cloning and Regulation of the Bone Rat Alkaline Phosphatase Gene Promoter.
1988-2002 Served as Assistant Professor at the University of Connecticut,
Associate and later Professor in the University of Southern California, and Visiting
Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of
Illinois, Chicago.
1988-2002 Conducted laboratory research and won millions of US Dollars in
grants from the US Government Departments of Health and Human Services and
Veteran Affairs, and also served as consultant to the US Government and various
corporations.
4) Videography, Photography
Below is only a selection of various art or documentary exhibits, where Dr Zernik has
been a subject of photography.
2015
2015-12-02 Interview by Marianne Azizi with Joseph Zernik
https://www.facebook.com/ImOnTeamHuman/posts/1671561586434007
2014
One of the subjects in a photo-journal report: "Life on the side of the road",
Photographer: Dan Haimovich, Site: Local Call (Israeli news outlet). [xcvi]
2013
One of the subjects in art photography exhibition: "Schaustelle Tel-Aviv-Berlin",
Artist: Maximilian Norz, Curator: Goethe-Institut. [xcvii]
LINKS:
8/15
Wiki Nerds, "Machine Learning", Google books

http://books.google.co.il/books?
id=4ZayAwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false
ii
Joseph Zernik. "Design and Operation of the Electronic Record Systems of the US Courts are Linked to Failing
Banking Regulation" Data Analytics, 2012
http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_3_50_60059
iii
Joseph Zernik, "Integrity, or Lack Thereof, of the Electronic Record Systems of the Courts of the State of Israel", Data
Analytics, 2012
http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_2_10_60063
iv
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Warrantless-imprisonment-o-by-Joseph-Zernik-Ehud-Olmert_Israel_JudicialCorruption-160218-268.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Zadorov
vi
vii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Zadorov-Affair-False-by-Joseph-Zernik-Exoneration_Israel_JudicialCorruption-And-Pedophilia-151215-702.html
viii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/PALESTINE-Champagne-in-Ka-by-Joseph-Zernik-JudaismJewish_Palestine_Terrorism-150915-999.html
ix
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Jewish-Valentine-s-in-Jeru-by-Joseph-Zernik-Banking-Fraud_Gay-PrideParade_Israel_Jerusalem-150731-282.html
http://www.opednews.com/articles/PALESTINE----SaveSusya-by-Joseph-Zernik-Demolition_Israel-PalestinianConflict_Susya-150724-370.html
xi
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Suicide-of-commander-Efrai-by-Joseph-Zernik-Israel_Police-Corruption-150719488.html
xii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Rabin-assassination-an-by-Joseph-Zernik-GovernmentCorruption_Israel_Judicial-Corruption_Shin-Bet-150702-245.html
xiii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/When-it-comes-to-the-First-by-Joseph-Zernik-Banking-Fraud_Freedom-Of-ThePress_Israel_Judicial-Corruption-150628-481.html
xiv
HRA-NGO Submission - as it appears on the UN HRC site

https://uprdoc.ohchr.org/uprweb/downloadfile.aspx?filename=1621&file=CoverPage
Zernik, J., Human Right Alert's Submission filed with the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations for the 2015
Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States: Large-scale fraud in the IT system of the US
federal courts - unannounced regime change?", scheduled for review in May 2015.
2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States - 22nd session - "Large-scale fraud in IT
systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?"
2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO): Appendix to UPR Submission - United States - 22nd session - "Large-scale fraud
in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?"
2015-05-11 United Nations Human Rights Council, Universal Periodic Review Second Cycle - United States of America
(22nd session) Summary of stakeholders' information
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G15/025/57/PDF/G1502557.pdf?OpenElement
xv
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Explosive-corruption-of-th-by-Joseph-Zernik-Freedom-Of-ThePress_Israel_Judicial-Corruption-150608-473.html
xvi
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Kabbalist-and-AG-Loret-by-Joseph-Zernik-GovernmentCorruption_Israel_Judicial-Corruption_Loretta-Lynch-150506-829.html
xvii
xviii
http://www.waset.org/abstracts/20899
http://waset.org/publications/10000336/it-systems-of-the-us-federal-courts-justice-and-governance
xix
http://www.opednews.com/articles/5/Los-Angeles-the-Jewish-co-by-Joseph-Zernik-Banking-Fraud_BetTzedek_Countrywide_Judaism-Jewish-141223-707.html
xx
http://www.opednews.com/articles/2/Israeli-Ombudsman-refuses-by-Joseph-Zernik-Israel_JudicialCorruption_Netanyahu_Whistleblowers-141109-518.html
xxi
2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States - 22nd session - "Large-scale fraud in IT
systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?"
2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO): Appendix to UPR Submission - United States - 22nd session - "Large-scale fraud
in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?"
xxii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Hannibal-protocol-Yeshaya-by-Joseph-Zernik-Israel_Israeli-Attacks-OnGaza_Judaism-Jewish-141009-685.html
xxiii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Urgent-international-petit-by-Joseph-Zernik-Homelessness_Israel_Occupy141005-993.html
xxiv
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-Attorneys-from-a-n-by-Joseph-Zernik-Israel_JudicialCorruption_Whistleblowing-140929-463.html
xxv
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Large-scale-fraud-in-IT-sy-by-Joseph-Zernik-Banksters_Citizens-United-VsFederal-Elections-Commission_Judicial-Corruption-140929-922.html
xxvi
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Harpaz-document-affair-by-Joseph-Zernik-Israel_Israel-Idf_Shin-Bet-140919557.html
xxvii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Robbing-Argentina-in-the-U-by-Joseph-Zernik-Argentina_Banking-Crisis_BankingFraud_Judicial-Corruption-140907-285.html
xxviii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-The-killing-of-Lie-by-Joseph-Zernik-Gaza-Invasion_Israel-140812256.html
xxix
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-The-killing-of-Lie-by-Joseph-Zernik-Gaza-Invasion_Israel_Israeli-AttacksIn-Gaza-140807-208.html
xxx
http://www.opednews.com/articles/What-part-of-the-missile-a-by-Joseph-Zernik-Corporations-Military-IndustrialComplex_Israeli-Attacks-In-Gaza_War-Crimes-140713-234.html
xxxi
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ARGENTINA-Again-on-the-ve-by-Joseph-Zernik-Argentina_Global-BankingCartel_International-Monetary-Fund--IMF_Israel-140630-923.html
xxxii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Israel-Fraud-in-the-Supr-by-Joseph-Zernik-Israel_Judicial-Corruption-140609730.html
xxxiii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Request-filed-with-Amnesty-by-Joseph-Zernik-AmnestyInternational_Government-Crime_Israel_Judicial-Corruption-140526-560.html
xxxiv
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Request-filed-with-Amnesty-by-Joseph-Zernik-AmnestyInternational_Government-Crime_Israel_Judicial-Corruption-140526-560.html
xxxv
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Tel-Aviv-courtroom-drama-e-by-Joseph-Zernik-Corporate-CorruptionCrime_Israel_Judiciary-Corruption-Crime_WHITE-COLLAR-CRIMES-140517-48.html
http://www.opednews.com/articles/OccupyTLV-Tel-Aviv-Police-by-Joseph-ZernikOccupy_Police-State_Tel-Aviv-140516-495.html
xxxvi
xxxvii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-After-years-of-abu-by-Joseph-Zernik-CitizenProtest_Israel_Judicial-Corruption_Whistleblowing-140505-277.html
xxxviii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/PALESTINE-IDF-soldiers-pr-by-Joseph-ZernikApartheid_Palestine_and_Israel_Protest-140503-984.html
xxxix
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Jerusalem-The-Big-Bongs-N-by-Joseph-ZernikJerusalem_Legalization-Control-Of-Drugs-140424-107.html
xl
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Israel-places-journalist-u-by-Joseph-Zernik-Freedom-OfThe-Press_Israel_Judicial-Corruption-140419-574.html
xli
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-New-trial-in-the-R-by-Joseph-ZernikAssassination_Israel_Judicial-Corruption_Shin-bet-140401-251.html
xlii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Israel-Supreme-Court-Pres-by-Joseph-ZernikIsrael_Judiciary-Corruption-Crime_Legal-Profession-Corruption-140312-185.html
xliii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-War-hero-Moti-Ashk-by-Joseph-ZernikBanking-Crime_Corporate-Corruption-Crime_Corruption-In-LegalProfession_Foreclosures-140227-143.html
xliv
http://www.opednews.com/articles/My-red-head-cousin-by-Joseph-ZernikFraud_Israel_Justice-140219-536.html
xlv
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-The-Shin-Bet-Judic-by-Joseph-Zernik-Israel_IsraelPalestinian-Conflict_Organized-Crime-Mafia-Mob-Cartels-140217-372.html
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Occupy-Tel-Aviv-Police-M-by-Joseph-Zernik-Corruption-InLegal-Profession_Government-Corruption_Government-Fraud_Human-Rights-Violations-140129467.html
xlvi
xlvii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Corpus-Separatum-Jerusalem-by-Joseph-Zernik-FreedomOf-Speech_Freedoms_Israel-Palestinian-Conflict_Jerusalem-140205-84.html
xlviii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-Large-scale-Fraud-by-Joseph-ZernikCorruption_Integrity_Israel_Justice-140103-395.html
xlix
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Prayer-for-the-peace-and-w-by-Joseph-Zernik-Bill-OfRights_Corruption_Corruption-In-Legal-Profession_Judges-140106-955.html
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Stanley-Fischer-s-legacy-i-by-Joseph-Zernik-Above-TheLaw_Banks_Banks-Bullying-Customers_Banksters-131130-448.html
li
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-Nation-hijacked-by-by-Joseph-ZernikCorruption_Fraud_Integrity_Judges-131026-653.html
lii
2013-10-15 Criminal fraud complaint filed with Israel Police against Presiding Justice of the
Supreme Court Asher Grunis
liii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Governor-of-Bank-of-Israel-by-Joseph-ZernikBankers_Banking_Banking-Crime_Banking-Crisis-130925-598.html#comment451421
Petition for criminal investigation of the Tel Aviv District Court, relative to the case of Moshe
Silman, self-immolated social protest activist.
http://www.atzuma.co.il/MosheSilman
liv
2013-04-15 Dr Zernik v Justice Minister Livni and Director of Administration of the Courts
Spitzer (2689/13) Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel (Hebrew with
English translation))
lv
lvi
http://www.opednews.com/articles/IDF-8200-cyberwar-unit--by-Joseph-Zernik-130816-906.html
lvii
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-Tel-Aviv-the-Human-Shie-by-Joseph-Zernik-130326312.html
lviii
2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the
electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel
Hebrew translation of the submission:
(2013) ) ( "
2012-05-10 Human Right Alert's Appendix I to Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, in
the electronic record systems in the courts of the State of Israel
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU
Human Rights Alert (NGO) short report as it appears on the United Nations site.
) ( "( "
(2013 )
http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/Session15/IL/HRA_UPR_ISR_S15_2012_HumanRightsAlert_E.pdf
2013-01-01 The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission, as incorporated into the UN Human RItghts Council UPR reprort
with the note "Lack of integrity in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts
in Israel" (page 4, paragraph 25)
( " 2013) "
:(25 ,4 ' " ), ,
lix
2012-04-16 Criminal fraud complaint (158921/2012) against SARAH LIFSCHITZ of the Supreme Court of the State of
Israel, filed with Israel Police, with certificate of complaint by the Fraud Division of the Jerusalem Police.
lx
2012-10-23 Joseph Zernik v Stanley Fischer (7650/12) Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel.
lxi
2012-10-19 Invalid Electronic Record Systems of the State and Federal US Courts Enablers
of Human Rights
Abuse and the Financial Crisis CYBERLAW 2013 paper peer-reviewed and accepted
2012-10-19 Integrity, or Lack Thereof, of the Electronic Records of the Courts of the State of
Israel CYBERLAW
2013 paper - peer-reviewed and accepted
lxii
lxiii
http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?
view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_3_50_60059
lxiv
http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?
view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_2_10_60063
lxv
2012-03-15 PRESS RELEASE: Evidence of widespread corruption of the US courts and

proposed corrective measures submitted to the US House of Representatives
2011-11-06 Simulated Records, Simulated Litigation, Enabled by the Electronic Records
Systems of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel
lxvi
2011-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing
banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
lxvii
2011-08-01 Zernik, J., Los Angeles Superior Court - widespread corruption and refusal of US
government to take action, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
lxviii
lxix
2011-07-02 Request for Impeachments US Judge OTool, Clerk Thornton, Both of the US
District Court, Massachusetts s
lxx
2011-03-09 Zernik, J: Fraud and Corruption in US Courts are Tightly Linked to Banking Fraud
and the Global Economic Crisis - 16th World Criminology Congress, 2011
lxxi
12011 -03-09 Zernik, J: Corruption of the Courts and the Legal Profession in California Noted
in a 2010 United Nations Report - 16th World Criminology Congress, 2011
lxxii
2011-03-09 Zernik, J: Invalid Case Management and Public Access System Implemented in
the Israeli Court, Undermining Human Rights - 16th World Criminology Congress, 2011
lxxiii
2011-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER

2011-01-28 Press Release: Windsor v Maid of the Mist (10-A690) in the US Supreme Court Alleged "Shell Game Fraud"
lxxiv
2011-01-23 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (10-56634, 10-56813): Zerniks Request for
Statement on the Record by Clerk Molly C Dwyer in re: Dockets of the Appeals
lxxv
2011-01-08 Dont Ask Dont Tell' - Motion to Intervene, Requesting the US Court of Appeals
to Dismiss the Appeals from an Uncertified Judgment, was Posted in the Docket, is Now
Pending before the Court
lxxvi
2011-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th
Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online
PACER dockets
lxxvii
2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights
Council for the
2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR
staff report:
On the United Nations site:
[1] 2010-04-08 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights
Council for the UPR of the United States, as it appears in the United Nations Human Rights
Council site
http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human
%20rights%20alert1.pdf
[2] 2010-04-08 Human Rights Alert (NGO) Appendix I to submission for the 2010 UPR of Human
Rights in the United States, as it appears on the UN site:
lxxviii
http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human
%20rights%20alert1.pdf
[3] 2010-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report, referring to
Human Rights Alert submission with the note "corruption of the courts and the legal profession
and discrimination by law enforcement in California" (page 6, paragraph 45)
lxxix
2010-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty Online Public Prisoners Registration
Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96
(2010)
http://www.musicdistribuce.cz/www/en/Publishing/Journals/MMM/Archive/MMM2010/MMM20101-web.pdf#page=85
lxxx
2010-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal
Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Attorney-Richard-Fine--di-by-Joseph-Zernik-100118435.html
lxxxi
http://www.opednews.com/articles/False-imprisonments-in-Los-by-Joseph-Zernik-100117673.html
lxxxii
2009-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir, Department of Computer Science, Hebrew University,

Opinion Letter re: Sustain - the Case Management System of the Superior Court of California,
County of Los Angeles
See also: Prof Shamir's Directory Information:
2009-04-20 Prof Eli Shamir, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, directory information
lxxxiii
2007-12-17 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) David Pasternak: Grant Deeds in re: 320 South
Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, opined as fraud by James Wedick
lxxxiv
2004-10-26 Opinion Letter of Fraud Expert Robert Meister re: Countrywide October 26,
2004 Underwriting Letter:
lxxxv
lxxxvi
2004-09-07 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Opinion Letter of Robert Meister re: Fraud in
Nivie Samaan's Prequalification Letter:
lxxxvii
2004-09-27 Opinion Letter by Fraud Expert Robert Meister re: Countrywide's Uniform
Residential Loan Applications (1003s) of Nivie Samaan:
2010-01-21 Zernik, J, LA Story, The New Republic, , May 31, 1993
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/early-perspective-on-los-angeles/
lxxxviii
lxxxix
2015-04-22 Schwartz, Y., and Zernik J., Brenner's curse continues to plague Shami to this date,
Haaretz Literary Supplement.
2013-07-26 Shamir, E and Zernik J, Keeper of the Last Mosque Haaretz

http://www.haaretz.co.il/literature/study/.premium-1.2078849
xc
Epilogue by Joseph Zernik, Nouvelles d'Hebron by Yitzhaq Shami (2006)

xci
God of Abraham God of Vengeance? By Joseph Zernik Haaretz, Sefarim (2005)

http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/534808.html
xcii
Yitzhaq Shami by Lambert M. Surhone, Miriam T. Timpledon, and Susan F. Marseken (2010)
xciii
Luminous Tales of Bygone Middle East by Merle Rubin, Los Angeles Times (2001)
xciv
Yitzhaq Shamis Hebrew Fiction Arabs and Jews Before Balfour by Issa Boullata, Al Jadid
(2001)
xcv
xcvi
http://mekomit.co.il/%D7%A9%D7%A0%D7%94-%D7%A2%D7%9D-%D7%9E
%D7%90%D7%94%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%9C
%D7%95%D7%96%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%91-%D7%A0%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A8/
Schaustelle Tel Aviv Berlin, Goethe Institue (2014)

http://www.goethe.de/ins/il/lp/kul/mag/sbt/deindex.htm
xcvii

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Fax: 077-3179186
"
6133301 ",33407 "
2012-05-31 Decision (88/12/Tel-Aviv District) by Ombudsman of the Judiciary

Eliezer Goldberg on complaints against Judge Varda AlSheikh in the
Reconstructed Protocol affair//
, "( /88/12)
" " ,2012 , 31
[]
JudgeVardaAlshechreconstructedprotocols,JusticeEliezerGoldebrgwrote
alandmarkdecision,exposingthefraudindevelopmentandoperationofNet
HaMishpatITsystemoftheIsraelidistrictandmagistratecourts.
____
Englishtranslationisprovidedonlyforpartsofthedecision,whichpertaintothe
developmentandoperationofNetHaMishpatandconductofjudgesandclericalstaff
relativetotheproduction,filing,service,andcertificationofjudicialrecords.
Thedecisiondocumentsingreatdetailthefailureofallsuchprocedures,whichwere
establishedincourtsinWesternnationscenturiesago,andwhichwereestablished
alsointheStateofIsraelfrom1936to2004,underRegulationsoftheCourts
RegistrationOffice(1936),promulgatedundertheBritishruleperiod...[1]TheBritish
Regulationswerevoidedin2004,concomitantlywiththeinitiationofdevelopmentof
NetHaMishpatandthetransitiontoecourtsinIsrael.NewRegulationsoftheCourts
OfficeoftheClerk(2004)werepromulgatedinstead...[2]
ThetwoprotocolsVersionAandVersionBandtheinvalidgraphicsignatureson
them,canbeviewedintheattachmentstothecomplaint,[3]filedwiththe
OmbudsmanoftheJudiciarybytheIsraelBarAssociation,whichisthesubjectofthe
decisionprovidedhere.
LINKS:
[1]19360000RegulationsoftheCourtsRegistrationOffice(1936)
[2]20040000RegulationsoftheCourtsOfficeoftheClerk(2004)
1/2
[3]20120126ComplaintagainstJudgeVARDAALSHEIKHintheReconstruct
Protocolaffair,filedbyIsraelBarAssociation,TelAvivRegionalChairmanEfiNaveh,
toJusticeMinisterYaakovNeeman,SupremeCourtPresidingJusticeDoritBeinisch,
andOmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryEliezerGoldberg,includingVersionAandVersionB
oftheprotocol,andComplaintagainstAttorneyArgaz,filedbyProfessionalAdvisor
oftheAdministrationofCourtsBarakLaseronbehalfofJudgeVardaAlSheikh//
Hebrew Wikipedia
The Reconstructed Protocols Affair
In June 2012 Justice Eliezer Goldberg, Ombudsman of the Judiciary, determined that
Judge Alshech perpetrated 36 technical and material changes in the protocol [minutes
jz] of a hearing she had conducted, in order to make the conduct of an attorney, against
who she filed a complaint, appear more severe. Following the Ombudsman's decision,
the President of the Israel Bar Association and the heads of the 5 Districts approached
Minister of Justice Yaakov Neeman and Presiding Justice Asher Grunis in demand to
remove Alshech from the bench. On July 27, 2012 Alshech announced her resignation
from her position as Chairwoman of the Judges Association. Presiding Justice Asher
Grunis decided to issue a serious warning against Alshech in her personal file as the only
sanction. He made it clear that he saw the matter seriously, and warned her against
repeating such conduct. However, he decided not to apply his authority according to
Base Law: The Judiciary, Article 7(4), which allows opening process for her impeachment.
Iin part, he took into account the fact that she was a very experienced and senior judge.
Following Presiding Justice Grunis's decision, the President of the Israel Bar Association
and heads of the 5 Districts approached Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman in demanding
that he use his authority and file a complaint with the Judicial Disciplinary Court and
demand her impeachment. A joint conference of Minister of Justice Neeman and the
leadership of the Israel Bar Association led to a compromise, based on Presiding Justice
serious warning to Alshech.
Note: Regardless, Alshech was later caught repeating the same conduct...

36 , , 2012
. " ,
,
2012 27- .
. "
, ,
:( 4) 7 ,
", . , , ,
,
.
, "
.
#
Document
Page
1.
20120531Decision(88/12/TelAvivDistrict)byOmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryEliezerGoldbergon
complaintsagainstJudgeVardaAlSheikhintheReconstructedProtocolaffairEnglishtranslation//
,31,("/88/12)
"" ,2012
2.
20120531Decision(88/12/TelAvivDistrict)byOmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryEliezerGoldbergon
complaintsagainstJudgeVardaAlSheikhintheReconstructedProtocolaffairHebreworiginal//
,31,("/88/12)
"" ,2012
15
2/2
[coat of arms state of israel]

Office of Ombudsman of the Judiciary
Chambers of Ombudsman Eliezer Goldberg
Supreme Court Justice (ret)
May 31, 2012
Ref: 88/12 Tel-Aviv District Court
Personal-Confidential-For the
addressees only
Complainants:
1. Attorney Effy Naveh, Chairman of the Tel-Aviv & Center

District, Israel Bar Association
2. Attorney Haim Arbel
3. Ometz-NGO (Citizens for Justice and Integrity in
Government)
4. Attorney Rafael Argaz
Subject of the Complaints: The Hon Judge Varda Alshech

Assistant Presiding Judge
Tel-Aviv District Court
Bankruptcy (1623/00) 1
Matter:
Complaints received on 2012-01-26; 2012-02-02; 2012-02-07;

2012-02-20 (in order of the Complainants)
DECISION
1. Four complaints were filed with the Ombudsman against the Hon Judge Varda
Alshech, Assistant Presiding Judge, Tel-Aviv District Court, pertaining to a hearing,
conducted by her on 2011-09-12 in Bankruptcy file 1623/00 (hereinafter the
hearing)... 2
1 The Ombudsman does not state the file caption: Bank HaPoalim v State Receiver.
The involvement of the largest bank in Israel in this scandal is significant. Judge
Alshech presided over the years in the largest corporate bankruptcy, dissolution,
and haircut cases.
2 Copy of the Complaint by Attorney Effy Naveh, Israel Bar Association, which
includes as attachments copies of the two Protocols, Version A and Version B can be
found in the link below. The records show the graphic signatures on the records,
and the stamp True Copy of the Original on Version A.
2012-01-26 Complaint against Judge VARDA ALSHEIKH in the Reconstruct
Protocol affair, filed by Israel Bar Association, Tel-Aviv Regional Chairman Effy
Naveh, to Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman, Supreme Court Presiding Justice Dorit
Beinisch, and Ombudsman of the Judiciary Eliezer Goldberg, including Version A
and Version B of the protocol, and Complaint against Attorney Argaz, filed by
Professional Advisor of the Administration of Courts Barak Laser on behalf of
Judge Varda Alshech

The Protocol in Net-HaMishpat System
Date of the hearing and production of the Protocol
18. On 2012-05-06 I received by email from the Hon Judge a printout from NetHaMishpat system, which lists Protocol Events, pertaining to the State Receiver's
Motion, heard on 2011-09-12, as stated above. The printout shows that on the date of
the Hearing Decisions were rendered by the Hon Judge on the State Receiver's
Motion at 9:44 and 9:56. At 10:21 Stop Hearing Event was registered, at 10:27
Continue Hearing Event was registered, and at 11:27 End Hearing Event was
registered.
In his 2012-05-01 letter, Attorney Laser states that examination, conducted at the
request of the Ombudsman, showed that the Protocol was first created on 2011-09-12
at 8:30, and that it was re-opened for editing on the same date at 10:27. 3
It is therefore possible to ascertain that after the Heating was concluded at 10:21, the
Hon Judge edited it for an hour, between 10:27 and 11:27.
Production of the Protocol
19. In her responses, dated 2012-02-05 and 2012-02-12, the Hon Judge conveys that
there are no two versions of the Protocol. Version A is a Draft Protocol, which her
secretary provided to Attorneys Arbel and Argaz by mistake, at their request, and
Version B is an Official Protocol, which was electronically signed by her after
being proofread. 4
TheHonorableJudge'sexplanationindicatesthatasfarasNetHaMishpat
systemisconcerned,anyprotocolbearsascannedgraphicsignatureofthe
judgeonalldecisions.However,untiltheprotocolrecordissignedbythe
judgeusinganelectronicsignature,itisadraftprotocol,whichismaintained
intheProtocolsFolderofthesystem...
Sincethescannedgraphicsignatureofthejudgeappearsalsoonthedraft,a
printoutofthedraftandaprintoutoftheelectronicallysignedprotocollook
thesame,andthereisnowaytodistinguishbetweenthem.Therefore,
accordingtoofficeprocedures,aprotocolshouldnotbeprintedoutfromthe
ProtocolsFolder(asdonebyhersecretary),butonlyaftertheyitwas
electronicallysigned,byexecutingtheProtocolApplicationbytheOfficeof
3 Attorney Barak Laser is Senior Legal Counsel of the Administration of Courts. His
conduct in this case and others is dubious. First, he colluded with Judge Alshech in
filing the semi-criminal complaint against Attorney Argaz, based on a falsified court
record (and Attorney Laser was one of the only persons to have access to system at
the level that permitted him to know that it was an invalid, unsigned record as
well.). Later, he provided to the Ombudsman incriminating information against
Judge Alshech. His conduct in this case and others has never been scrutinized.
4 All underlines in the original jz
theClerk.5
Moreover,corrections,whichareimplementedinaprotocolafteritwas
electronicallysigned,wouldgenerateinthesystemanewversion,named
CorrectedProtocol,alongsidetheoriginalversionoftheprotocol.In
contrast,changesinaprotocolthatwasnotelectronicallysignedarenot
recordedandsavedasseparateversions,andalleditingissavedunderthe
sameelectronicfileoftherecord.Theexaminationshowsthatinthiscase,
theHistorylistingofthesystemlistsnopreviousversionsoftheProtocol,
onlyoneversion,whichisVersionB,whichwasfiledwiththeComplaintto
theIsraelBarAssociation.6
AstothecorrectionsmadeintheProtocolthemselves,theHonJudgestates
thatsincetheHearingwasstormyandwasofteninterrupted,thetranscriber
didnothaveachancetorecordeverythingthatwassaid.She(theHon
Judge)thereforeinformedthepartiesthattheProtocolwouldbeprovidedto
themattheendofthebusinessdayattheOfficeoftheClerk....Regardlessof
hernotice,AttorneysArbelandArgazwentdowntotheOfficeoftheClerk,
wheretheyinformedhersecretarythattheywerecomingfromthe
courtroom,andtheydidnotreceivetheProtocol.Thesecretary,whowas
burdenedwithservicetothepublic,madeanerror,enteredNetHaMishpat
systeminthewrongway,andprintedoutforthemfromtheProtocolFolder
whatwasonlyaDraftProtocol.Additionally,andcontrarytooffice
procedures,thesecretarycertifiedtheDraftProtocolTrueCopyofthe
Original,althoughtherewasnoOriginalbeforeher.7
5
The information provided here shows that some effort was made to simulate in NetHaMishpat the operations of a competent Office of the Clerk. Namely, the Judge
writes, the judicial record and electronically signs it. Only after that, the Office of
the Clerk is supposed to execute the Protocol Application, which in fact enters the
signed protocol into the public Decisions Docket. However, the Ombudsman's
decision also documents in great detail that none of it is performed in practice. In
fact, the implementation of Net-HaMishpat was equivalent to abolishing the Office
of the Clerk and its duties and authorities relative to the maintenance and integrity
of the records. The Regulations of the Courts Office of the Clerk (2004), were
accordingly changed, to abolish the legal duties and authorities of the Chief Clerk
relative to the maintenance and integrity of the records,
6 The essence of the Complaints against Judge Alshech was that she falsified a court
record in order to file with the Israel Bar Association the semi-criminal complaint
against Attorney Argaz.
7 This paragraph contains important information. It shows at once that Judge
Alshech and the Ombudsman are familiar with what are honest procedures
regarding the filing and certification of court records, and that such procedures are
in fact not upheld since the introduction of Net-HaMishpat. As the Ombudsman later
comments, contrary to what Alshech describes as an error by her secretary, her
conduct was typical: Judges do not electronically sign the records in Net-HaMishpat,
and unauthorized staff, untrained and uninformed, relative to the significance of
electronic signatures in Net-HaMishpat, delivers such record so parties and counsel
as valid court records. Additionally, the routine certification in the courts, as in this
case, is by unauthorized persons. The Regulations of the Courts Office of the
Clerk (2004) establish the Chief Clerk as the person, who is authorized to certify
court records. Here an authorized judge's secretary certifies uncertifiable court
NottoolongaftersheelectronicallysignedtheProtocol,hersecretarysentthe
entirerecord[VersionBEG]totheparties.8
TheHonJudgeemphasizedthatnoneoftheattorneysfiledarequestfor
correctionoftheProtocol,orarequestforclarification,inordertocorrectthe
situation.TheyrecalledtoaddresstheissueonlyaftertheIsraelBar
AssociationapproachedAttorneyArgaz.
20. My inquiries with the Director of the Administration of Courts, asking for his
comments on the computer system perspective of production of the Protocol, were
answered by copies of email correspondence between the computer system personnel
and the Hon Judge, which were provided for my review, in letters by Attorney Barak
Laser to the Ombudsman, in a 2012-02-29 letter by Mr Yarden Yardeni, Director of
the Net-HaMishpat project in the IT Systems and Computers Wing of the
Administration of Courts, to Attorney Barak Laser. 9
21. Inhis20120229letter,MrYardenYardeniwrites:
Onagivenhearingdate,thecourttranscriberopensanewelectronic
protocolfile,whichopensaprotocoltemplateWorddocument.Inorderto
starteditingtherecord,thetranscriberhastoperformtwofunctionsinthe
Wordrecord:AddPersonsPresent,andStartHearing.Untilthese
functionsareperformed,itisimpossibletoedittherecord.TheStart
HearingactiontriggerstheProtocolApplicationtaskfortheOfficeofthe
Clerk.10Attheendofthehearing,thetranscriberperformsintheWord
documenttwoadditionalfunctions:GraphicSignatureandEndHearing.
records on a routine basis.
8 This sentence is further detailing of the sequence of events by Judge Alshech.
Below, it turns out to be false: The Protocol record was never electronically signed.
However, this sentence also documents the breakdown of lawful service procedures
following the implementation of Net-HaMishpat. A secretary (unauthorized staff)
sent by mail an unsigned, invalid court record, in lieu of lawful service of a signed,
valid court record, accompanied by an authentication letter by the Office of the
Clerk.
9 Regarding Mr Yarden Yardeni, see a separate complaint to the Ombudsman of the
Judiciary, which was also found justified. The Complaint pertained to ex parte
communications by Judge Kafah and Mr Yardeni, which Judge Kafah denied, in a
case related to lack of integrity in Net-HaMishpat as well.
http://magazine-consumer.com/tag/%D7%94%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%A4%D7%98%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9F-%D7%A7%D7%A4%D7%90%D7%97%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%94%D7%9C-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%98%D7%99-%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%90-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%93/
10 Again, showing the initial implementation of correct functions of the Office of the
Clerk in Net-HaMishpat, but failure to perform them in reality. Once the protocol is
completed and electronically signed by the judge, the Office of the Clerk is
supposed to enter the protocol into the docket. However, such functions are not
performed in majority of court files in Net-HaMishpat. The vast majority of
protocols in Net-HaMishpat are apparently never electronically signed. As a result,
the vast majority of protocols in court cases in Net-HaMishpat fail to appear in the
docket, resulting in double-books: There is one public docket and another docket
used by the court, which includes the unsigned protocols.
Thetranscriber,whensoorderedbythejudge,canprintoutacopyofthe
protocolpriortotheexecutionoftheEndHearingaction,sothattheparties
leavethecourtroomwithacopyoftheprotocol.11Aftertheexecutionofthe
EndHearingfunction,theWorddocumentisclosedandfiledintheProtocol
Folderasadraft.ThejudgethenenterstheProtocolFolderandexecutesthe
electronicsignatures.Theexecutionoftheelectronicsignaturetransformsthe
electronicfilefromdrafttofinalrecord,inthesensethatitislockedfromany
furtherchanges...TheProtocolApplicationtaskappearsintheOfficeofthe
Clerkonthehearingdate.IfthetheclerkattemptstoperformtheProtocol
Applicationpriortotheelectronicsigningoftheprotocoldraftbythejudge,
hewouldgetawarningmessagethattheprotocolisnotsignedyet,andthe
systemwouldpreventthecompletionoftheProtocolApplication.
However,theprintingofaDraftProtocolbytheOfficeoftheClerkispossible,
byenteringtheProtocolFolderinsteadofusingtheProtocolApplication.
Undersuchcircumstancesthereisnopromptwarningtheclerkthatthe
protocolisunsigned.
Itisimpossibletodistinguishbetweenagraphicallysignedprotocolandan
electronicallysignedprotocoloncetherecordhadbeenprinted.Withit,in
theelectronicfilesinNetHaMishpatsystemthereareseveralwaysto
distinguishbetweenthem:Theelectronicallysignedprotocolshowsthecoat
ofarmsoftheStateofIsraelincolor,whilethegraphicallysignedprotocol
showsitwithnocolors.Additionally,thetasklineofagivenprotocolappearss
ingreenoncetheprotocoliselectronicallysigned,andinblackaslongasitis
adraft.Additionally,thereisdocumentationoftheexecutionofelectronic
signatureintheProtocolEventsfolderinthesystem.12
No electronically signed Protocol was discovered
22. Following the receipt of the Hon Judge dated 2012-02-05 and 2012-02-12, we
received the 2912-03-01 letter by Attorney Barak Laser to the Ombudsman, where I
was surprised to find the following:
"We discovered that there is only one version of the 2011-09-12 Hearing Protocol, a
version that is still not electronically signed... Under such circumstances, the
discovery of only one version of the Hearing Protocol, subject of the Complaints,
11 Here, the statements by mr Yardeni become false and misleading. The paper
provided under such circumstances to the parties is not a copy of the protocol, as
explained by Judge Alshech and the Ombudsman, it is merely a Draft Protocol,
albeit, parties, counsel, and the public at large cannot distinguish the fact that it is
an unsigned, invalid court record, bearing only a graphic signature.
12 It should be noted that regardless of numerous requests in various courts and
directly to the Administration of Courts, they courts absolutely refuse to permit
inspection of the electronic signature data of judicial records, even by a party in the
case. Therefore, the courts effectively refuse to permit a party to ascertain,
whether a judicial record is a signed, valid record, or an unsigned, invalid record.
There is no way to explain such conduct, which is consistent with honesty and
integrity of the courts.
indicates that there is no prior signed version of the Protocol. [Bold added- EG]
Also a 2012-02-27 letter by Attorney Barak Laser to the Hon Judge, which was
provided for mky review, indicates: There is only one version of the 2011-09-12
Hearing Protocol, a version, which is still not electronically signed in the system.
[Bold added- EG]
The same matter is also indicated in Attorney Barak Laser's 2012-04-15 letter, which
says: According to the examination, the protocol, which is the subject of your
inquiry, was not electronically signed... The Hearing Protocol is still filed as a Draft
Protocol in the Protocol Folder.
23. On 2012-03-13 I asked the Hon Judge to address the fact that there is no
electronically signed version of the Protocol, and to clarify how such fact stands
relative to her responses on the Complaints.
24. The Hon Judge responded on my letter on 2012-03-15:
"I operated the signature option after I proofread the Protocol. If, and to the degree
that there was some problem or failure of the system, and my signature was not
executed by the system, and the record remained unsigned, it should be considered a
computer system failure, which should be addressed by computer systems personnel,
who are experts on such matters. I know for sure that I signed the Protocol. Such is
my practice since we have been working with the system, and I have not changed my
practice in this case either. [Bold, underline in the original EG] 13
25. On 2012-03-19 I inquired with the Director of Administration of Courts, whether
the finding that there is no electronically signed Protocol to this date, can be settled
with the claim by the Hon Judge, that she executed the electronic signature function.
The response was by Attorney Barak Laser's 2012-04-15 letter, which says: We have
no information regarding such failure today or in the past.
I have not found that the Hon Judge filed any alert regarding such failure, when she
discovered that Version B was not electronically signed.
26. In my 2012-05-03 meeting with the Hon Judge, I asked her why she stated that
Version B of the Protocol was electronically signed, and why she failed to state that
there was no electronically signed record, as described above.
She said:
"If I did not write I was wrong... I don't know why I didn't write to you... I was
focused on the Complaint. When you get a bomb dropped on your head, you focus on
what is there.
13 The entire story of course does not add up. If the Protocol was not signed
electronically, it should have been impossible to add it to the public docket, and
likewise, it should have been impossible to duly execute the Service Application
(see below). Therefore, the case shows that beyond keeping the records unsigned,
the courts routinely bypass the other procedures, set in place for centuries in
honest courts, namely due service, and the maintenance of honest dockets.
In a 2012-05-06 letter, sent to me by the Hon Judge following our meeting, she
writes:
"Another point that bothered me was the fact that it was painted as if I deliberatively
tried to be imprecise regarding the date, starting which, purportedly, I knew that the
Protocol was never signed. I admit that the period that I experienced (and still am
experiencing) is not the easiest... I had no intention to deliberately hide any
information, things were done honestly, at a time of great emotional storm.
27. She also informed me in her 2012-05-06 letter, referenced above, that she had
conducted another review with her secretary, which showed that Version B of the
Protocol (which she stated that she sent to the parties at the end of the day), was
printed out from the same place that she printed out Version A, which she provided to
Attorneys Arbel and Argaz, that is, from the Protocols Folder, and not from the
Protocol Application task. 14
Indeed, such statement is consistent with the fact that no electronically signed
Protocol exists.
28. I don't find it necessary to get into further details of the investigation in this
matter, and I would sum it up, that today, as before, there is no evidence of a
computer failure, which prevents the execution of an electronic signature on this
Protocol record, and the evidence before me makes it possible to determine, that the
Hon Judge had never electronically signed the Hearing Protocol, Version B, prior to
its submission to the filing of the Complaints with the Ombudsman, and that she
knew about it prior to the filing of the Complaints (once the affair was published by
media).
All that is left for me to say is that the concerns that I raised with the Hon Judge
during my meeting with her has not been addressed.
Printing the Protocol and providing it to the parties
29. In his Complaint, Attorney Argaz claimed that at the end of the Hearing, the Hon
Judge referred the parties to the Office of the Clerk for receipt of the Protocol.
According to the Hon Judge, she informed the parteis at the end of the Hearing that
they would be able to get the Protocol in the Office of the Clerk at the end of the day.
30. In this matter I determine that even if the Hon Judge informed the parties as she
states (since I cannot ascertain, given the conflicting versions in this matter), I cannot
accept her position, that Attorneys Arbel and Argaz went to the Office of the Clerk to
get the copy of the Protocol at the end of the Hearing out of bad faith motives.
14 Here again, there is documentation that following the implementation of NetHaMishpat, unauthorized staff executes false service of unsigned, invalid court
records. However, the recipients cannot distinguish such facts.
31. The Hon Judge attached to her 2012-05-12 response a letter, written by her
secretary, Ms Hagit Kostiner, dated 2012-01-26, where she detailed how she
produced the Protocol for Attorneys Arbel and Argaz, honestly, and without any
knowledge that that Protocol was signed graphically, but not electronically.
According to the secretary: 15
"Only after the fact I was informed that I should not have produced the Protocol out
of the Protocol Folder, but only by execution of the Protocol Application, and
likewise, that the certification True Copy of the Original, which I gave them, was
not on an authentic protocol (electornically signed) but on draft protocol and
decisions (such that need to pass through proofreading prior to electronic signature).
To the best of my memory, and most likely also in this case, I placed the Protocol in
an envelope and mailed it to the parties at the end of the day. 16
32. In her 2012-02-26 letter to the Ombudsman Ms Kostiner writes:
"It is not customary to mail copies of the protocols, unless the judge writes at the end
of the protocol The Office of the Clerk shall mail copies [there is not such
comment in instant Protocol- EG] 17 As stated, it is customary to send copies to all
parties by mail... There is no Certificates of Service [in Net-HaMishpat system
EG] 18 In an additional letter, dated 2012-04-01, Ms Kostiner clarifies: Regarding
your question today, I don't remember whether I sent the Protocol by mail... Most
likely I placed the Protocol in an envelope and mailed it to the parties at the end of
the day, when I received it, if so asked (by a note from the parties), because such is
my practice... I sent by mail with no Certificate of Service. Therefore, the
nonexistence of Certificates of Service cannot lead to the conclusion that the Protocol
was not mailed out by me.
33. In his 2012-04-15 letter to the Ombudsman, Attorney Barak Laser says:
There is no documentation, indicating whether the Protocol was printed, and how.
When service is executed through the system, then there is documentation of it. A
protocol that was not electronically signed cannot be electronically served through
the system, only on paper. In the paper court file there is no documentation that the
Protocol was delivered or sent to any of the parties. However, it should be noted that
15 This episode again shows the invalidity in design and operation of Net-HaMishpat:
Unauthorized, untrained, uninformed personnel performs false certification, false
service, and provides false records to parties and counsel, without even being
aware of the difference between authentic and unauthentic court record, or the
significance of honest service and certification procedures for integrity of the
courts. In contrast, it is obvious that the judges know exactly what is right and
what is wrong...
16 The secretary here admits that she routinely executes false service procedure of
false court records...
17 As stated here, it should also be noted that Israeli judges have stopped using the
proper legal terms serve and service, relative to their own judicial records.
Instead they use today invalid legal terms: Mail, forward, inform, etc.
18 Here there is documentation of major failure in integrity of Net-HaMishpat in
maintaining copies of Certificates of Service.
it is possible that the Protocol was mailed out by regular mail, following guidelines to
the staff, following the 2011 Saving on Mail initiative, and therefore, there si no
documentation of the mailing of the Protocol.
34. In his Complaint, Attorney Argaz notes that he figured out the difference between
the two versions of the Protocol, only after the Bar Association asked for his response
on the Complaint, filed against him by the Administration of Courts. 19
...
35. Given that both Counsel for the State Receiver and Attorney Arbel received from
the Court Version B of the Protocol, there is no reason to doubt the statement by Ms
Kostiner, that she mailed to the parties at the end of the day Version B of the Protocol.
...
Certification of Version A in the Office of the Clerk True Copy of the Original
36. As stated, Version A of the Protocol record, which was provided to Attorneys
Arbel and Argaz in the Office of the Clerk, was stamped True Copy of the Original
by the Hon Judge's secretary. In her 2012-02-05 response, the Hon Judge States:
This action by the attorneys shows their dishonest intention. They were holding a
record, which appeared to be signed by me, graphically, why did they ask for it... to
be certified True Copy of the Original? Only the attorneys can resolve this issue. 20
She attached to her response Office Procedure Instruction 114/10 of the
Administration of Courts, Stamping True Copy of the Original on Printouts of
Judgments and Office Procedure Instruction 67/09 The Use of True Copy of the
Original Stamp.
Office Procedure Instruction 114/10 says:
"In the era of electronic court files, judgments are signed by secure, certified
electronic signature, pursuant to the E-sign Act (Article 6b and the Second
Supplement), a judgment record, signed by a secure electronic signature, is not
deemed an original court record. From the statement above, it is originates, that
printouts of electronically signed judgments, are not deemed original records, and
should be stamped as detailed in instant Instruction... Once a decision or judgment
were rendered in the court file, which is signed by a secure electronic signature, the
19 It should be noted, that according to the procedures in Israel, the Complaint to the
Bar Association was not field directly by Judge Varda Alshech, but by the
Administration of Courts, more specifically - by Attorney Barak Laser. Therefore,
the only two parties, who had access to system data, which showed that Version B
of the Protocol was never electronically signed, colluded in filing a semi-criminal
complaint, based on an invalid, unsigned judicial record. At the same time, neither
Attorney Argaz, nor the Israel Bar Association, which was supposed to review the
Complaint, could distinguish that it was based on an invalid, unsigned judicial
record...
20 This is one of the strangest arguments by Judge Alshech, who as stated above, was
a prominent Israeli judge, who handled some of the most complicated, largest
corporate court cases...
Office of the Clerk shall act to transfer certified copies to the parties, as detailed
herein: 3.1 Print the required number of copies. 3.2 Stamp each copy True Copy of
the Original. 21
These statements are also consistent with Attorney Barak Laser's 2012-05-01 letter to
the Ombudsman:
"The printout of an electronic message, which is electronically signed, is deemed,
pursuant to the E-sign Act (2001), Article 6(b), a copy.
Office Procedure Instruction 67/09 says:
"Once a person appears in the Office of the Clerk, holding a copy of a court record,
the staff member shall act as follows, to inspect the record, prior to its stamping:
Offices of the Clerks, which are administered through Net-HaMishpat system...
Locate the original record in the electronic court file, and stamp it True Copy of the
Original. 22
37. Obviously, absent an electronically signed Protocol, Version A, which was

provided to Attorneys Arbel and Argaz in the Office of the Clerk, shouldn't have
been stamped True Copy of the Original...
Attorney Arbel explained in his 2012-04-09 letter to the Ombudsman, why he asked
for stamping [certification] on the Protocol: I needed an lawfully authenticated
Protocol, in order to file my appeal with the Supreme Court, which was indeed
filed... 23
Failures relative to the Protocol computers, Office of the Clerk, and Judges
38. Chronological Report of the Events, dated 2012-03-21, which was prepared by
21 It should be noted that the Instructions cited here, and other documents, obtained
through Freedom of Information requests and other communications with the
courts, all fail to state that the law authorizes only the Chief Clerk to certify court
records. In practice, for almost a decade, unauthorized persons routinely certify
court records.
22 Instruction 67/09, cited here, fails to state: a) who is authorized to perform the
certification? b) How is that person to ascertain that the record is electronically
signed? c) Where in the electronic court file should the record be located ? (e.g.,
The Protocols Folder vs the public Decisions Docket)
23 It should be noted that Attorney Arbel and Attorney Argaz were fully informed of the
significance of certified authentication on a court record that was to be filed in
another legal process here an appeal. But judge Alshech and Attorney Barak
Laser filed a semi-criminal complaint with the Israel Bar Association, using an
printout of the Protocol, Version B (which as we now know was never electronically
signed) and which was never certified. And the Israel Bar Association accepted the
filing of such complaint. This issue, which is critical relative to the deceit in Judge
Alshech conduct, is never questioned by the Ombudsman... Accordingly, Judge
Alshech and Attorney Barak Laser never had to explain their conduct, relative to
filing a semi-criminal complaint against Attorney Argaz, based on an unsigned,
uncertified court record.
the Internal Audit Wing, Administration of Courts, was provided for my review. The
record says:
" Investigation Results: 24 On 2011-09-12 Hearing was conducted on Motion #3 in
Court File Bankruptcy 1623/00 in the Courtroom of Judge Varda Alshech in the TelAviv District Court...
The secretary thought that by printing out a copy of the Protocol from NetHaMishpat, she was in fact printing a copy of an original, and therefore, she stamped
it True Copy of the Original. She stated that the persons, who trained the staff,
during the implemetnation of Net-HaMishpat, never taught the staff regarding the
various ways of printing out records, the differences and their significance between
printing out a copy through Protocol Application and printing it out from the
Protocol Folder... According to the Director of the Bankruptcy Division and
according to the secretary, all the employees used to print out protocols also through
the Protocols Folder... According to the secretary, until this case, some of the
judges were not aware of the significance of electronic signatures, and therefore
would not electronically stamp their completed protocols. That was the case also in
this court file one can see in Net-HaMishpat that the Hearing Protocol has never
been electronically signed by the Judge to this day... 25 According to the secretary,
during the time of the incident, she was not aware that there was any difference
between a graphic signature and an electronic signature. Since some of the judges
routinely failed to use electronic signatures, the staff was blocked by the system, and
could not perform the Protocol Application on protocols. Therefore, the trainers,
who implemented Net-HaMishpat taught them how to circumvent the system by
printing out protocols through the Protocols Folder. According to the Computers
Wing, originally protocols were water-stamped DRAFT, if they were printed prior
to being electronically signed by the judge. However, pursuant to demands by the
judges, the water-stamp was removed. The judges claimed that it slowed down the
transition between court file. 26 According to Mr Yarden Yardeni from the
Computers Wing, even today he encounters cases of judges who fail to sign their
protocols by electronic signatures...
39. There is noting I can add but join the recommendations of the above cited report
whole-heartedly. Judges should be instructed, as soon as possible, regarding the
importance of electronically signing their protocols and decisions (see in this context
Regulations of Civil Procedure (1984), Article 190(a), which says: Decisions shall
24 The Internal Audit report in fact documents that the circumstances surrounding the
Reconstructed Protocol were not unique at all. Judges routinely fail to
electronically sign their decision records. The records are routinely not processed
through the system into due docketing and service.
25 These statements of course stand contrary to the explanation previously provided
to the Ombudsman by Judge Alshech and her secretary. The notions that judges in
the most central and influential district court in Israel, did not understand the
meaning of the E-sign Act (2001) ten (10) years after its enactment, is ludicrous.
26 The statements here, regarding the training of staff to produce copies of unsigned,
invalid court records, and the demand by the judges to remove the water-stamp
DRAFT from unsigned records, are some of the most disturbing evidence of
centrally orchestrated fraud in design and operation of Net-HaMishpat.
be in writing, singed by the judges who adjudged), and train judges and staff
regarding the manner in which decisions should be produced in Net-HaMishpat, and
restoring the water-stamp DRAFT should be considered, even if it places some
burden (as claimed) on the judges. 27
The corrections in the Protocol
The nature of the corrections
40. In her responses on the Complaints, the Hon Judge indicates that the majority of
the corrections in the Protocol are proofreading corrections, completion of truncated
sentences, punctuation, spelling, deletions and errors in transcription... ... if all
correction are reversed, and the Draft Protocol is restored, except for unedited and
deficient Hebrew, nothing material would be changed!!!
41. I hold that even if majority of the differences between the versions... are only
matters of editing and phrasing... certain corrections should be deemed material.
44. It is impossible not to be impressed that the above listed corrections made the
circumstances more severe, compared with Version A, for filing the complaint with
the Israel Bar Association.
...
85. In conclusion, the Complaints are found justified, based on paragraphs . above.
[hand signature]
_____________
Eliezer Goldberg
Ombudsman of the Judiciary
CC: Complainants
The Hon Judge Varda Alshech
The Hon Presiding Judge Devora Berliner, Tel-Aviv District Court
The Hon Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, Supreme Court
Prof Yaakov Neeman, Minister of Justice
The Hon Judge Moshe Gal, Director of the Administration of Courts
27 Even today (2006) four (4) years after the rendering of the Ombudsman's report,
after the Internal Audit Report, none of the recommendation has been throughly
implemented. Judge refuse to produce electronically signed record on a routine
basis, courts refuse to lawfully serve their records, and invalid records are routinely
certified True Copy of the Original... The refusal to correct the failures is supports
the conclusion of centralized, organized fraud in the design and operation of NetHaMishpat.

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Fax: 077-3179186
"
6133301 ",33407 "
2012-01-26 Israel Bar Complaint against Judge Varda Alshech in the Fabricated
Protocols scandal //

[]
Figures:TelAvivDistrictJudgeVardaAlshech,OmbudmanoftheJudiciaryEliezerGoldberg,and
AdministrationofCourts'LegalCounselBarakLaser.AlshechwasapowerfuljudgeoftheTelAviv
DistrictCourt,whoforyearshandledthelargestcorporatedissolutions,bankruptcies,andhaircut
cases,attimesrulingonmattersofNISbillionsinasinglecase.Moreover,sheservedatthetimethe
ChairwomanoftheJudges'Association.OmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryGoldbergwroteadecisionof
historicsignificance,documentingtheinvalid,fraudulentnatureofNetHaMishpatnewelectronic
casemanagementsystemofthedistrictandmagistratecourt.CounselLaser'sroleinthescandal
againdemonstratedtheunique,centralroleofAdministrationofCourtsincorruptionoftheIsrael
justicesystem.
Seealso:
[1]20120531DecisionbyOmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryEliezerGoldbergintheJudgeVardaAlShech
fabricatedprotocolsscandal
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5RnBOUWYtd0IzcVk/view?usp=sharing
ForthenonHebrewreader:
Themostinformativepartoftherecordsbelowareitems#4and#5,whicharethetwo
versionsoftheSeptember12,2011Protocol,issuedbyJudgeVardaAlshech.Bothversions
showmultipleinvalidgraphicsignatures,andVersionAalsoshowsaninvalid,fraudulent
certificationstamp,TrueCopyoftheOriginal,onitsthelastpage.
Briefchronology:
onSeptember12,2011,adisputeeruptedinthecourtroomduringahearinginBank
HaPoalimvStateReceiverbetweenJudgeAlshechandAttorneyRafaelArgaz,who
representedasmalldebtholderinthecase.Alreadyduringthehearing,Alshechinformed
AttorneyArgazthatsheintendedtofileanethicscomplaintagainsthimwiththeIsrael
Bar.Therefore,inordertohaveahavearecordofthetransactions,AttorneyArgaz
obtainedonthesamedatefromtheOfficeoftheClerktheSeptember12,2011hearing
protocol(minutes),whichappearedtohimsignedandcertified,TrueCopyofthe
Original(VersionA,#5,page17,below).
OnSeptember22,2011,thecomplaintwasindeedfiledwiththeIsraelBarAssociation
(#3,page5,below).ThecomplaintwassignedbyAttorneyBarakLaseronbehalfofthe
AdministrationofCourts,andincludedasattachmentanditsdocumentaryevidencethe
1/3
September12,2011hearingprotocol,whichappearedsigned,butnotcertified(VersionB,
#4,page7,below).
OnOctober10,2011,theIsraelBarAssociationforwardedthecomplainttotheTelAviv
BarEthicsCommitteeforreview(#2,page4,below).
OncehereceivedthecomplaintfromtheTelAvivBar,AttorneyArgazrealizedthatthe
September22,2011protocol(VersionB),whichwasattachedtothecomplaint,was
substantiallydifferentfromtheSeptember22,2011protocol(VersionA)inhispossession,
andthatthechanges,introducedinVersionB,purportedtorecordwords,whichheand
theotherparticipantsinthehearinghadnotspoken,andtherebyfalselyascribetohim
maliciousconductandintentions.
Next,AttorneyArgazraisedhisconcernswiththeTelAvivBarregardingthedifferences
betweenVersionAandVersionBoftheSeptember22,2011protocol.
Followingreviewofthematter,theTelAvivBarAssociationdecidedtodismissJudge
Alshech'scomplaintagainstAttorneyArgaz.
OnJanuary26,2012,theTelAvivBarfiledinsteadacomplaint(#1,page1,below)
againstJudgeAlshechwiththeOmbudsmanoftheJudiciary,theMinisterofJustice,
SupremeCourtPresidingJustice,andtheJudicailAppointmentsCommittee.Infact,the
TelAvivBarsuggestedthatJudgeAlshechbedismissedfromthebench.Later,following
yetanotherincidentofthesamenaturewithJudgeAlshech,ChairoftheTelAvivBar
Associationreleasedanunusualstatementtomedia:JudgeAlshechcannotremain
anotherdayonthebench.
Outcome:
JudgeAlshechwasnotdismissedfromthebench.Infact,nomaterialsanctionswere
imposedonher.Duringtheaffair,twosuccessiveSupremeCourtPresidingJustices(Dorit
BeinischandAsherGrunis)objectedtoholdingheraccountable,andJusticeMinisterYaakov
NeemanwaskeyfigureinbrokeringasettlementbetweenJudgeAlshechandtheIsraelBar
(theRuleofLawwasneverpartofthesettlement...)
Withit,Israelijudgeshaveeffectivelyestablishedanewstandard,wherebytheyarepermitted
toperpetratefraudfromthebench.Indeed,VardaAlshechherselfwasrepeatedlylatter
caughtinthesameconduct,withimpunity...
Generalcontext:
theFabricatedProtocolsorReconstructedProtocolscandal,quicklybecamethemost
notoriousjudicialcorruptionscandalinthehistoryoftheStateofIsrael.
OmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryEliezerGoldbergthoroughlyreviewedtheIsraelBarcomplaint
againstJudgeVardaAlshech.TheMay31,2012Ombudsman'sdecision[1]holdshistoric
significance,sinceitprovidedunprecedented,detailedreviewofthemannerinwhichthe
Israelicourtsareadministeredtoday,followingtheimplementationoftheESignAct(2001)
andNetHaMishpatelectroniccasemanagementandefilingsystemofthedistrictand
magistratecourts(around2010justacoupleofyearsbeforethescandalerupted).
TheOmbudsman'sdecisiondocumentedthatfollowingtheimplementationoftheESignAct
(2001)andNetHaMishpat,judgesroutinelyfailtoelectronicallysigntheirjudicialrecords.
Leavingthemunsigned.Thejudgesholdsuchelectronicallyunsignedrecordstobemerely
drafts.Furthermore,asdraftsthejudgesholditpermissibletogoonchangingthe
records,evenaftertheywerepublishedandpresentedtothepartiesandcounsel.
Ontheotherhand,theOmbudsman'sdecisiondocumentedthatNetHaMishpatwasdesigned
andisoperatedinsuchmannerthatparties,counsel,andthepublicatlargecannotviewany
oftheelectronicsignaturedata.Therefore,nobody,exceptforthejudges,candistinguish
betweenanauthentic,validandeffectualcourtrecordsandinvalid,unenforceabledrafts.
Infact,JudgeGoldberg'sdecisiondocumentsthatevenhehimselfcouldnotaccessthe
electronicsignaturedata,andhehadtorelyontheAdministrationofCourts'LegalCounsel,
AttorneyBarakLaser,toprovidetheOmbudsmantheelectronicsignaturedataofJudge
2/3
Alshech'sjudicialrecords,ordocumentthelackthereof.Onecannotunderstatetheabsurdity
ofitall,sinceAttorneyBarakLaserwasakeyfigureinperpetratingtheunderlyingfraudin
collusionwithJudgeAlshechhewastheonewhofiledthecomplaintagainstAttorneyArgaz
onbehalfofJudgeAlshech,attachingtoitVersionBoftheprotocol...
JudgeGoldberg'sdecisioninincludedvariousrecommendationforaddressingthelackof
integrityandvalidity(nottosayfraudulentnature)ofNetHaMishpatsystem.However,but
noneofthemhasbeenimplementedtothisdate(2016).
Asawhole,conditionswhichweredocumentedinthisaffairshowthatthetransitiontoe
courtsinIsraelrenderedtheofficesoftheclerks(traditionallychargedwithcustodyofcourt
records)andthecourtsingeneralincompetent,andsusceptibletojudicialfraudand
corruption.ItisobviousthatJudgeAlshech'sconductwasnotunusualorunique,andthe
onlyreasonthatitgotattentionandwasthoroughlyinvestigatedwasthatthevictimofthe
fraudwasanattorneyappearingincourtascounsel,afactthatgeneratedstronginterestand
supportbytheIsraelBarAssociation.
#
Document
Page
1.
20120126Complaint,filedbytheTelAvivBarAssociationwithMinisterofJusticeYaakovNeeman,
PresidingJusticeoftheSupremeCourtDoritBeinisch,andOmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryEliezer
GoldbergagainstTelAvivDistrictJudgeVardaAlshechintheFabricatedProtocolsscandal//
,,,
,
"
2.
20111010ReferralletterbytheIsraelBarAssociationtotheTelAvivBarAssociation,inre:Judge
VardaAlshech'scomplaintagainstAttorneyRafaelArgazintheFabricatedProtocolsscandal//
":"
""
3.
20110922Complaint,filedwiththeIsraelBarAssociationbytheAdministrationofCourts'Legal
CounselBarakLaser,onbehalfofJudgeVardaAlshech,againstAttorneyRafaelArgazinthe
FabricatedProtocolsscandal.//
",
"""
4.
AttachmentA:VersionBoftheSeptember12,2011Protocol,whichwasfiledasanattachmenttothe
complaintagainstAttorneyArgaz.//
.",2011,12':'
5.
AttachmentB:VersionAoftheSeptember12,2011Protocol,whichwasobtainedbyAttorneyArgaz
onthehearingdateintheOfficeoftheClerk.
.",2011,12':'
17
6.
AttachmentC:SummaryTabledifferencesbetweentheProtocols,VersionAandVersionB.//
.'':'
26
7.
AttachmentD:StatementofAttorneyHaimArbel,inre:ComplaintbytheAdministrationofCourts
againstAttorneyRafaelArgaz//
."":'
28
8.
AttachmentE:StatementofAttorneyRafaelArgaz,inre:ComplaintbytheAdministrationofCourts
againstAttorneyRafaelArgaz//
.":'
30
3/3
Human Rights Alert, NGO

Joseph Zernik, PhD
3144PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313

"
91313 ,31440 "
123456xyz@gmail.com;
13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Haifa

Magistrate Court Declaration of the Conservatee's son in re:
Judge Esperanza Alon
"In a civilized society, such conduct should be deemed criminal. Moreover, such
conduct is typically related to white collar organized crime by judges and attorneys
In a matter before the Haifa Magistrate court, Judge Esperanza Alon:
1) Changed the case file number with no explanation. (falsification of the Index - the
#1 Book of Court, defining any court derived from the English common law).
2) Then scheduled a hearing on a motion, filed under the new case file number,
under a court calendar slot, scheduled under the old file number. (falsification of the
Calendar - the #2 Book of Court, defining any court derived from the English common
law).
3) Changed from time to time the names of parties in both case file numbers with no
explanation at all.
4) Issued a protocol (equivalent of minutes) which failed to correctly name those
present in court at the proceeding, and refused to correct it when given notice.
5) Purported to summon me to court under both case file numbers, albeit, with no
lawful summons in either court file number. (I refuse to enter a court of this nature in
this manner).
6) Issued two different and contradictory decision papers (unsigned, unauthenticated)
in one of the court file numbers. Attorney claims that decision paper A is the
"corrected" and valid decision in the matter. A person from the court (who holds no
lawful authority) issued a letter, explaining that only decision paper B is the
"corrected" and valid decision in the matter. The Chief Clerk refuses to certify either A
or B "True Copy of the Original". The judge herself remains mute on the matter of the
two contradictory decision papers.
When asked to respond on her conduct overall, which I claimed in a paper, which I
filed, to be indicative of obstruction of justice and white collar criminal conduct, Judge
Alon only states in yet another "decision" paper that "a person, who is not a legal
scholar, would find it difficult... to understand the mystical secrets of court
procedures."
Additional tidbits:
1) The Chief Clerk in the Haifa Magistrate Court occupies his office with no lawful
appointment record.
2) The same judge, who claims that I am a party in one of the two court files, but not
the other, continues to deny my access to the fundamental records in both court files,
such as names of parties, attorneys, and case calendars.
3) In Israel, access to court papers is generally denied, even in civil, unsealed cases.
The public is entitled to see only selected decisions. (no First Amendment/ common
law right "to access court records to inspect and to copy").
1/8
4) The current electronic systems in all courts in Israel - from the magistrate courts to
the Supreme Court, have no dockets at all... which means that if a judge decides to
eliminate papers from the electronic files, there is no record of it later.
Record
Page #
12-13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Haifa Magistrate

1
2 13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Haifa Magistrate
Court Declaration of the Conservatee's son in re: Judge Esperanza Alon

[English translation]
Court Declaration of the Conservatee's son in re: Judge Esperanza Alon

[Hebrew original]
LINKS:
[1] 13-04-15 Dr Zernik v Justice Minister Livni and Director of Administration of the Courts
Spitzer (2689/13) Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel (Hebrew with
English translation))
2/8
In the Haifa Family Court

1829-06-10
In RE: Conservatee RSZ
Filer: The Consevatee's son, Joseph Zernik
Parties (to the best understanding of the Filer):
1. Conservator Robert Zernik, through his Counsel Attorney Amos Zadika
2. The State Attorney's Counsel Ministry of Justice
3. The State Attorney's Counsel Ministry of Welfare
Other Conservatee's children:
1. Dror Zernik Conservatee's son
2. Uri Zernik Consevatee's son
Declaration of the Conservatee's son: Judge Esperanza Alon Master of
Mystical secrets of court procedures, or obstructionist of justice with
impunity?
The Court is asked to address instant Declaration within 14 days.
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, ID no... , knowing that I must say the truth,
and that I may be punished pursuant to the law if I fail to do so, declare as
follows:
1. My name is Joseph Zernik and the Conservatee is my mother.
2. The evidence provided below indicate the issuance of simulated court
decisions and simulated service of simulated court decisions as part of
conduct simulated court process by Judge Esperanza Alon in the Haifa
Magistrate Court, files no 1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13. In a civilized
society, such conduct should be deemed criminal. Moreover, such conduct
is typically related to white collar organized crime by judges and
attorneys.
3. Therefore, failure of Judge Alon to address instant Declaration in general,
and in particular regarding the different and contradictory March 17, 2013
decision records (a-d, below) is not reasonable for conduct of a judge.
4. Instant Declaration is concomitantly filed with repeat requests to inspect and
to copy the court files listed above.
a) Judge Alon so far failed to provide an explanation for the different and
contradictory March 17, 2013 decision records, which were issued in her
name in file 25607-03-13 [1]
5. Two different and contradictory decision records, dated March 17, 2013
were issued in court file 25607-03-13 in the name of Judge Esperanza Alon.
113-03-17 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Three (3) falsified
decision records / simulated service of process, received by certified mail from the Clerk of
the Court and from Attorney Amos Sadika
3/8
a. Regular Decision - which in part says: The Requester shall serve the
Request on the Responder and on Joseph Zernik for response within 60
days. This record was purportedly served on me by Attorney Amos Zadika
and by the Office of the Clerk.
b. Nonsensical Decision - which in part says: The Requester shall serve
the Request on the Responder and on Joseph Zernik for response within 45
days. Absent agreement, the matter shall be reviewed in conjunction with
Requests that were scheduled in court file 1829-06-10 for April 4, 2013, at
12:00 noon. This record was purportedly served on me by Attorney Amos
Zadika, but NOT by the Office of the Clerk.
6. Such matter, which appears as undermining of due process, was detailed in
the April 2, 2013 Notice and Declaration by the Requester to Inspect and to
Copy, Joseph Zernik.
7. To this date, no response was received on this matter by Judge Esperanza
Alon.
b) Chief Clerk Israel Hen continues to refuse to certify either one of the
different and contradictory decisions True Copy of the Original - and
therefore authenticity of both is at least dubious.
8. On March 24, 2013 and again on April 21, 2013, I sent letters to Chief
Clerk Israel Hen, informed him regarding the state of affairs, pertaining to
the above mentioned contradictory decisions, and asked that he certify under
his hand signature, pursuant to the Regulations of the Courts (Office of the
clerk) 2004, Regulation 6a, one or both of these records True Copy of the
Original, as he deems fit, pursuant to his duties and obligations as Chief
Clerk. [2]
9. To this date, I have not received a response from Chief Clerk Israel Hen
on the requests to certify such records True Copy of the Original.
10.
Therefore, both records should be deemed court records, whose
authenticity is at least dubious.
c) An explanation on behalf of Chief Clerk Israel Hen for the March 17,
2013 different and contradictory decision records claims that the
Nonsensical Decision was issued first, and Regular Decision was
issued later as correction to the Nonsensical Decision.
11.
A letter on behalf of Mr Israel Hen, dated April 21, 2013, pertaining to
this matter, was issued by Area Administrator Ms Shulamit Gonen. [3]
2 13-03-24 RE: RSZ (25607-03-13 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No 4 to Chief
Clerk Israel Hen, in RE - conflicting, unreasonable court orders dated March 17, 2013 by
Judge Esperanza Alon
13-04-21 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No
5 to Chief Clerk Israel Hen, in RE inspection of court file, certification of court records,
appointment record of the Chief Clerk
313-04-21 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa Response letter on behalf of "Chief Clerk" Israel Hen
4/8
12.
The April 21, 2013 letter by Ms Shulamit Gonen is void on its face as a
response by Chief Clerk Israel Hen, for lack of authority, as detailed in my
May 19, 2013 letter to Mr Israel Hen. [4]
13.
With it, Ms Gonen's letter addresses the above mentioned contradictory
decision records, and says, This decision was removed from the record by
the Honorable Judge Esperanza Alon and corrected, therefore, this decision
was not meant to be mailed [sic, not served - jz] by the Office of the Clerk
and was not mailed by the Office of the Clerk to the parties.
14.
Such statement does not explicitly state, which is the decision record
that was removed from the record and which is the corrected record.
However, one can conclude that the Nonsensical Decision was the first of
the two (and the one that was removed from the record), and the Regular
Decision was the second of the two (and the corrected one) since the
Regular Decision is the only one that came into my hands through mailing
by the Court as purported service.
c) Email messages by Attorney Amos Zadika, Counsel of the Conservator,
present the Regular Decision as the one that was issued first, and the
Nonsensical Decision as the one that was issued second, as correction of
the Regular Decision.
15.
Email communications by Attorney Amos Zadika, Counsel of the
Conservator, pertaining to the decision records, entirely contradict Ms
Gonen's words:
a. On March 18, 2013, at 11:45am, Attorney Zadika forwarded to me by
email Judge Alon's Regular Decision (which was printed out from Net
HaMishpat system on March 17, 2013 and scanned on March 18, 2013, at
8:45am).
Appendix A is a copy of the first email that I received from Attorney
Zadika on March 18, 2013, and purported Judge Alon Decision that was
attached to it.
b. On March 18, 2013, at 3:16pm, Attorney Zadika forwarded to me by
email Judge Alon's Nonsensical Decision (which was scanned at
11:55am). Moreover, in the accompanying text, Attorney Zadika explicitly
says: Following a Decision, previously sent to you by email, I am
forwarding to you a corrected decision by the Honorable Court. Pursuant to
the corrected decision, response time was shortened to 45 days, and
regardless, proceeding was scheduled for April 4, 2013.
Appendix B is a copy of the second email that I received from Attorney
Zadika on March 18, 2013, and purported Judge Alon Decision that was
attached to it.
4 13-05-19 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter
No 6 to Chief Clerk Israel Hen, in RE certification of court records, appointment record of
the Chief Clerk
5/8
16.
Based on Attorney Zadika's correspondence the Regular Decision was
the first of the two contradictory decision records, and the Nonsensical
Decision was the second, and the Nonsensical Decision is purportedly
corrected decision by Judge Alon.
17.
Therefore, there is reasonable cause for suspicion of fraud, pertaining to
the issuance of these two contradictory decisions, and also a reasonable
cause for suspicion that Judge Alon engaged, directly or indirectly, in ex
parte communications, and that denial of my access to records in court file
number 25607-03-13 is meant, at least in part, to prevent discovery of
conclusive evidence of such fraud.
d) Judge Esperanza Alon falsified the foundation Books of Court Index
of All Cases and Calendar of the Court.
18.
Judge Esperanza Alon caused the opening of a new court file in this
matter (25607-03-13) with no foundation in the law, and with it she
undermined the integrity of the Index of All Cases, the primary foundation
Book of Court.
19.
Judge Esperanza Alon caused the conduct of a hearing in a motion,
which was registered under the new court file number (25607-03-13), while
the proceeding itself was registered under the old file number (1829-06-10),
and with it she undermined the integrity of the Calendar of the Court, the
secondary foundation Book of Court.
e) Judge Esperanza Alon refuses to correct a false and misleading April 4,
2013 Protocol in instant court file (1829-06-10)
20.
Judge Esperanza Alon issued a false protocol record for the April 4,
2013 proceeding, where even the names of those attending are false.
Moreover, such protocol record was received by me when each page is
watermarked in extra-large inscription Unsigned, making its authenticity
at least dubious. When such falsehoods were brought to Judge Alon's
attention, she responded in her May 6, 2013 decision in instant court file
(1829-06-10), which says: regarding scribe's errors, in a closed process I
see no need to delve into them at this stage. Therefore, Jude Alon decided
to leave uncorrected a false and misleading protocol that she herself issued.
f) Judge Esperanza Alon refuses to address false and misleading record
that were filed by the Conservator and others in these court filed (1829-0610 and 25607-03-13)
21.
Judge Alon failed to respond to this date on repeat notices, accompanied
by incontrovertible evidence of false and deliberately misleading records,
which were filed in these court files by the Conservator and his counsel,
and false and misleading facts in the Social Worker's report in instant court
file (1829-06-10).
f) Judge Esperanza Alon denies my access to inspect and to copy the court
files. (see concomitantly filed Repeat Requests to Inspect and to Copy)
22.
On April 29, 2013, I filed Requests to Inspect and to Copy the two court
files (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13).
23.
Regarding my Request to Inspect and to Copy court file 1829-06-10 , no
decision was received by me to this date.
6/8
24.
Regarding my Request to Inspect and to Copy court file 25607-03-13, I
received the May 2, 2013 Decision by Judge Alon, which says:
"In this court file the Requester is a Party to the process. Pursuant to the
principles of Transparency and Equality among the Parties, the Requester is
permitted to inspect and to copy motions, responses, and decisions in the
court file, and pursuant to Court Procedures. Request to produce screen
prints is out of compliance with Court Procedures and is denied.
25.
the May 2, 2013 Decision by Judge Alon in court file 25607-03-13 is
baseless in its parts and in its entirety:
a. "In this court file the Requester is a Party to the process - Judge Alon
failed to explain the legal foundation for such statement.
b. Pursuant to the principles of Transparency and Equality among the
Parties - such claim is false on its face Counsel for the Conservator may
create screen prints at any time through Net HaMishpat system. Had Judge
Alon indeed intended to establish Transparency and Equality among the
Parties, all she had to do was key in my ID number as party, or person of
interest, and thereby permit my equal access to the records, such as
permitted to the Conservator's Counsel.
c. Request to produce screen prints is out of compliance with Court
Procedures
- Judge Alon failed to provide a reference to such deluded statement.
- According to such deluded statement, pursuant to Israeli Court Procedures,
a person, who is a party to legal process, is prevented from court file data
pertaining to identity of the parties, counsel, and case calendar.
g) Chief Clerk Israel Hen continues to refuse to produce a copy of his
appointment record, and is most likely a simulated Chief Clerk.
26.
Mr Israel Hen signed his February 24, 2013 letter Chief Clerk and
District Administrator, Magistrate Courts, Haifa District, [5] and he also
appears as Chief Clerk in the online page of the Court.
27.
To this date Mr Hen refuses to produce a copy of his appointment record
as Chief Clerk of the Court, and such record was not found so far in the
State Registry either.
28.
Such state of affairs undermines the competency of the Haifa Magistrate
Court, since Mr Israel Hen should be deemed simulated Chief Clerk.
h) Judge Esperanza Alon master of the mystical secrets of Court
Procedures, or obstructionist with impunity?
29.
In her May 6, 2013 Decision in instant court file (1829-06-10) Judge
Alon probably refers to her own conduct when she says: a person, who is
not a legal scholar would find it difficult to represent himself and
comprehend the mystical secrets of Court Procedure.
30.
A reasonable person, even if not a legal scholar, who would examine
the facts, pertaining to Judge Alon's conduct in these court files (1829-06-10
513-02-24 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Response by Chief Clerk
Israel Hen on Letter No 1- Request for certificates of service of court decisions
7/8
and 25607-03-13), would most likely conclude that Judge Esperanza Alon is
no master of the mystical secrets of Court Procedures, and that the correct
description of her conduct can be found in the words of the late Moshe
Silman in the opening lines of his last letter obstructionist of justice with
impunity, which referred to Magistrate Hagai Brenner and the Tel Aviv
District Court.
i) Judge Esperanza Alon and the Haifa Magistrate Court reflect the
corruption of the Israeli courts over the past decade
31.
The facts, outlined above, have significance far beyond the two
respective court files (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in documenting
unprecedented corruption of the Israeli courts over the past decade. The Human
Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United
Nations tied this process to:
a. Implementation of new computerized systems in the courts (including
Net HaMishpat): These systems are inherently fraudulent.
b. Fraud in implementation of the Electronic Signature Act (2001):
implementation of invisible electronic signatures - The Emperor's New
Clothes
c.
Undermining the authority of the chief clerks, who today have no
lawful appointment records: The Israeli courts have been occupied over
the past decade by simulated chief clerks.
As a consequence of such process, judges in Israel today have direct, unlimited
access to fabricate, remodel, and falsify court records.
Today, May 22, 2013,
[signature]
_____
Joseph Zernik
Conservatee's Son
8/8
" . " - " :

60 ".
" , .
" . " - " :
45 . ,
" 1829-06-10 ,04.04.13 ".12:00
" , .
.6 , "
, , " 2-,
.2013
.7 .
" . "
" " "
.8 24- ,2013 , 21- ,2013 , " "
, ,
, )( ,2004 6 ,
" , " ,
[2] .
.9 " "
" " ".
.10 "
.
. " " 17-,
,2013 , ,
" .
.10 21- ,2013 , "
" ' [3] .
.11 ' " " ,
, 19-[4] .2013 ,
.12 , ' ",
: ' ,
" " ".
13-03-24 2 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - " " .
13-04-21 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - " " .
13-04-21 3 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - "
" "
13-05-19 4 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - " " .
2/5
" "?
.13 "" "" .

' ," "
) ""( ," " )
""( " " ,
.
. " " " "
" , " " ,
" "
.14 " ," ,
' :
. 18- ,2013 , ,11:45 " "
" " ) 17-
,2013 , 18- ,2013 , .(08:53
' " , " 18-,
,2013 .
. 18- ,2013 , ,15:16 " "
" " ) , .( 11:55 ,
:
, ' " .
45-
.04/04/13
' " , " 18-,2013 ,
.
.15 " " "
," " ," "
" " .
.16 , ,

, 25607-03-13
.
.
.17 ) (25607-03-13
, )(
.
.18 )
(25607-03-13 ) ,(1829-06-10
.
. 4- ,2013 , )
(1829-06-10
.19 4-
,2013 , . ,
" " , .
3/5
" "?
, 6-,
2013 ) ,(1829-06-10:
, , " .
, .
.
) 1829-06-10(25607-03-13 -
.20

,
).(1829-06-10
. )
(
.21 29- ,2013 , ) 1829-06-1025607-03- -
.(13
.22 ,1829-06-10 .
.23 25607-03-13 -
2 ,2013 ,:
. ,
,/ .
".
.24 2- 2013 , 25607-03-13 :
. "
.
" . " ... -

.

" , " "
, .
" . ":
.
,
, , .
" . " ,
" "
5
.25 24-" [ ] ,2013 ,
, ,
.
.26
13-02-24 5 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - "
"
4/5
" "?
, .
.27 ,,
.
. ": " " "?
.28 6- ,2013 , ) (1829-06-10
:
.
.29 , "" ,
) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 -
" " ,
," , ,
" -
".
" .

.30 )1829-06-10
- (25607-03-13 - .
) (NGO " :
. ) (
: .
. ) (2001 :
" ".
. ,
:
.
, , ,
.
22 ,,2013 ,
_______________
,
5/5
" "?
'
'
Botschaft
der Bundesrepublih: Deutschland
Tel Aviv
Bing.
Human Rights Alert (
2 2. AUG. l013
.. .......................................... .
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Ani ............... Dopp ........................... .
PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv 6133301
August zz, Z013

The Honorable Ludwig Blaurock
Consul of the German Federal Republic, Tel Aviv
RE: Request for protection by the German Consul to Israel of a German citizen -a
human rights activist/informatics writer in Israel
Time is of the essence!
Dear Consul Blaurock,
Please accept instant letter, the attached records (Table 1 and Table 2, [1]), and records,
which were filed with you in January Z013, [ZJ as request for protection of a German citizen- a Human Rights activist/informatics writer in Israel.
As was the case in January Z013, I am again concerned of ongoing abuse of my fundamental Human Rights by the Israeli authorities, including the potential unlawful taking
of my money, my freedom to travel, and;or my liberty.
In 2010 I escaped from the United States, under serious threats on my life, following the
filing of the Human Rights Alert (NGO) Universal Periodic Review submission to the
Human Rights Council of the United Nations. The submission was later incorporated
into the 2010 Universal Periodic Review report on the United States with the note, "corruption of the courts and the legal profession in California".
In Israel, I continued my research work, and the Human Rights Alert CNGO} Z013 submission to the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Universal Periodic Review
report on Israel with the note, "lack of integrity in the electronic records of the supreme
court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel".
In parallel, in January Z010, my bank accounts in Israel were seized by Bank HaPoalim,
BM, purportedly on behalf of the US government, but with no legal process at all, either
in the US or in Israel (similar measures were taken against Assange and Wikileaks in October 2010 [3]}. Moreover, the Israeli authorities denied my attempts to gain Equal Protection under the Law. My money was returned only after I filed a request for protection
with the German Consul in Israel.
Since then, I continued my my Human Rights activity, including the initiation, with others, of a petition, calling upon the Israeli Attorney General to instruct the Israel Police to
conduct criminal investigation against the Tel Aviv District Court. The petition pertains
to allegations of"obstruction of justice with impunity" in the case of self-immolated, social protest activist Moshe Silman. [4] To this date, the petition has been signed by over
100 people, including a number of Israeli attorneys.
I have also discussed conditions in the Israeli courts with former Minister of Justice Prof
Daniel Friedman and former National Security Adviser Giora Island. Both of them advocate reform of the court system in Israel. Both of them have also showed interest in
1 Most of the records have been translated into English. The rest will be translated over the next couple
of weeks and posted under the same URLs.
2 13-01~23 Request for protection by the German Ambassador to Israel of a human rights/informatics
writer in Jerusalem
3 10~12~25 Banks and WikiLeaks ~ NYTimes
4 13-07-13 Online petition calls upon the Israeli Attorney General to instruct Israel Police to initiate
criminal investigation of Silman's claims of "obstruction of justice with impunity" in the Tel Aviv District
Court.
1/2

Joseph Zernik, PhD
PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv 6133301
August 22, 2013

The Honorable Ludwig Blaurock
Consul of the German Federal Republic, Tel Aviv
RE: Request for protection by the German Consul to Israel of a German citizen a
human rights activist/informatics writer in Israel
Time is of the essence!
Dear Consul Blaurock,
Please accept instant letter, the attached records (Table 1 and Table 2, [1]), and records,
which were filed with you in January 2013, [2] as request for protection of a German citizen a Human Rights activist/informatics writer in Israel.
As was the case in January 2013, I am again concerned of ongoing abuse of my fundamental Human Rights by the Israeli authorities, including the potential unlawful taking
of my money, my freedom to travel, and/or my liberty.
In 2010 I escaped from the United States, under serious threats on my life, following the
filing of the Human Rights Alert (NGO) Universal Periodic Review submission to the
Human Rights Council of the United Nations. The submission was later incorporated
into the 2010 Universal Periodic Review report on the United States with the note, corruption of the courts and the legal profession in California.
In Israel, I continued my research work, and the Human Rights Alert (NGO) 2013 submission to the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Universal Periodic Review
report on Israel with the note, lack of integrity in the electronic records of the supreme
court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel.
In parallel, in January 2010, my bank accounts in Israel were seized by Bank HaPoalim,
BM, purportedly on behalf of the US government, but with no legal process at all, either
in the US or in Israel (similar measures were taken against Assange and Wikileaks in October 2010 [3]). Moreover, the Israeli authorities denied my attempts to gain Equal Protection under the Law. My money was returned only after I filed a request for protection
with the German Consul in Israel.
Since then, I continued my my Human Rights activity, including the initiation, with others, of a petition, calling upon the Israeli Attorney General to instruct the Israel Police to
conduct criminal investigation against the Tel Aviv District Court. The petition pertains
to allegations of obstruction of justice with impunity in the case of self-immolated, social protest activist Moshe Silman. [4] To this date, the petition has been signed by over
100 people, including a number of Israeli attorneys.
I have also discussed conditions in the Israeli courts with former Minister of Justice Prof
Daniel Friedman and former National Security Adviser Giora Island. Both of them advocate reform of the court system in Israel. Both of them have also showed interest in
1 Most of the records have been translated into English. The rest will be translated over the next couple
of weeks and posted under the same URLs.
2 13-01-23 Request for protection by the German Ambassador to Israel of a human rights/informatics
writer in Jerusalem
3 10-12-25 Banks and WikiLeaks - NYTimes
4 13-07-13 Online petition calls upon the Israeli Attorney General to instruct Israel Police to initiate
criminal investigation of Silman's claims of "obstruction of justice with impunity" in the Tel Aviv District
Court.
1/2
my original work in this area, which is based on analysis of the new computer systems in
the courts, not on legal analysis.
As detailed in the attached records (Table 1 and 2), I am now named Respondent (Defendant) in a court process in the Haifa Magistrate Court, where:
No summons was ever issued or served on me;
No court record spelled out the section of the law, based on which I was purportedly sued;
No court record, which was served on me, spelled out the names of the parties
to the litigation;
Court decisions were served (when served at all) unsigned by the judge and accompanied by unsigned authentication letters by an unnamed clerk;
The Chief Clerk of the Court refused to certify any of the judicial records in this
case True Copy of the Original;
Request for exemplary punitive measures against me is now purportedly
pending, which failed to state the section of the law, based on which such punitive measures are to be imposed, [5,6] and
I am denied access to the court records in the same court file.
A reasonable person, upon review of the facts in this matter would surely conclude that
such court is engaged in a sham court action and in violation of the Human Right for Fair
Hearing/Due Process.
My attempts to protect my rights in this matter through State of Israel authorities of all
three branches of government have failed.
Therefore, I ask protection by the German Consul of a German citizen in Israel against
potential unlawful abuse of my rights:
1. Taking of my money;
2. Denial of my right to travel: I plan on traveling to Berlin for the opening of the
Goethe Institute's exhibition Schaustelle Tel Aviv-Berlin by Photographer
Maximilian Norz, where I am one of the subjects of the photography (no date
announced yet). Likewise, I plan on traveling to Hamburg in December 2013 for the
Chaos Computer Club conference there.
3. Taking of my liberty: I may be falsely imprisoned.
It should be emphasized that I have no expectation of correction of wrongs done by the
court under the respective court files, only protection against unlawful retaliation for my
whistle-blowing actions.
Time is of the essence, since the Haifa Magistrate Court scheduled a hearing in this
matter for September 17, 2013. [7]
Truly,
______________
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Attached:
1) Table 1: Summary of Evidence of the Conduct of Sham/Simulated Litigation
2) Table 2: Court file and related records of the Haifa Magistrate Court
5 13-07-03 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13 ) - Request for exemplary punitive measures, filed under the
title, Response by the Responders on Request to Inspect Court Records
6 13-07-25 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court filing letter to the
State Attorney in re: Fraud under the guise of court actions
7 It should be noted that I have not appeared in this court and do not plan on appearing, since from the
start it was clear that the court was and is abusing my right for Fair Hearing.
2/2
Table 1 Summary of Evidence of the Conduct of Sham Litigation in the Haifa Magistrate
Court in re: Conservatee Rivca Shami Zernik (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13)
In the early 2000s, while I was still residing in the US, my elderly mother started showing signs of
senility. In 2005, she was diagnosed as Alzheimer's Disease patient. Regardless, no legal action
was initiated to designate her legally incompetent, and as it turned out years later, during these years
my father and my brother executed various legal records in her name.
On June 1, 2010, five weeks after I escaped to Israel, legal action was filed for designating my
mother legally incompetent and appointing a conservator. Initially, attempt was made to keep this
court action secret from me and from her brother, my uncle, with whom I was staying at the time
(according to Israeli law, all first degree relations had to be noticed).
Eventually, I learned about this action, and during the following couple of years, my suspicions
grew that such action was directed against me. Therefore, in December 2012, I filed request to
inspect the respective court file in the Haifa Magistrate Court, and I gained partial access.
Review of the records affirmed my suspicions. False and deliberately misleading records were
discovered, which were biased against me, starting with the commencing record, which stated that I
was nowhere to be found, and therefore, could not consent to the process.
Regardless of my efforts, the Court refused to correct any of the false and deliberately misleading
records. Moreover, once I discovered the records, the Court initiated actions, which are inconsistent
with any notion of Fair Hearings:
The original court file was declared closed, and a second court file was purportedly
commenced on the same matter. In the second court file, I was purportedly named
Respondent (Defendant), but no summons was ever issued, and no law of the State of
Israel was indicated as the foundation for such action.
I am not permitted to inspect the court file records in either court file.
Some of the Court's decision were not served on me, the purported Respondent, and I am
not permitted to inspect them, even after repeated requests. Neither am I permitted to
inspect the list of decisions (docket).
To this date, all judicial records, which have been served on me were unsigned by the
judicial authority and were accompanied by unsigned authentication letters by an unnamed
Clerk.
The Chief Clerk of the Court has refused to certify any of the court records in these court
files True Copy of the Original.
It should be noted that I have never appeared in court in person, neither through an attorney under
either court file. Instead, I have repeatedly filed papers, indicating the false and misleading nature
of the Court's actions, and consequent disqualification of the court.
A reasonable person, upon review of the records, will surely conclude that the Haifa Magistrate
Court and others were and are engaged in the conduct of sham litigation in this matter, in violation
of key articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Once I advertised the nature of the Court's conduct, request was filed for exemplary punitive
actions against me, now purportedly pending before the Court.
Court file #
1829`06`10
25607-03-13
Notes:
1) Israeli family law prescribes the
combining of related family matters, if
commenced under different court files. [1]
In contrast, here Judge Esperanza Alon
1 Family Court Act 1995, Article 6 says: Combining Court Files (a) In case several complaints were filed in a
family matter in the same judicial district, such complaints shall be jointly reviewed, in a Family Matters Court
decided by the Presiding Judge of the Magistrate Court...
1/8
split one matter into two court file

numbers, out of compliance with the law,
[2] and regardless of opinion to the
contrary by Counsel for State Attorney. [3]
2) After opening the second court file,
Judge Alon refused to correct or address
any of the false records, which were filed
under the first court file, which she claims
closed. [4]
Court
Haifa Magistrate Court

Notes:
Notes:
1) Israel Hen - Chief Clerk occupies See on the left column.
the office of Chief Clerk with no
lawful appointment record.
2) All judicial records in this case were
served on Dr Joseph Zernik unsigned
by the judicial authorities and
accompanied by unsigned
authentication letter by an unnamed
Clerk.
3) Chief Clerk Israel Hen holds no
appointment record:
a) No appointment record was found in
the official Register of the State of
Israel, and Mr Hen refuses to respond
on numerous requests to present his
appointment record. [5]
b) On the first response letter, Mr Hen
signed as Chief Clerk. [6] However,
following my requests for his
appointment record, subsequent letters
were no longer signed by Chief
Clerk, and more recently, Chief
Clerk Israel Hen refuses to respond at
all on correspondence.
d) Mr Hen refuses to certify any of the
judicial records in these cases True
2 See 1, above.
3 13/03/24 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) Intermediate Response by Counsel for the State Attorney, opining combining of
the newly opened court file 25607-03-13 with the original court file - 1829-06-10
4 13-05-06 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision of Judge Esperanza Alon on a) False and
deliberately misleading April 4, 2013 Protocol, and b) Notice of obstructionist conduct "mystical secrets of court
procedures"
5 13-04-21 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No 5 to Chief Clerk Israel
Hen, in RE inspection of court file, certification of court records, appointment record of the Chief Clerk
6 13-02-24 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Response by Chief Clerk Israel Hen on Letter No
1- Request for certificates of service of court decisions
2/8
Copy of the Original. [7]

Judges
1) Ehud Rekem Presiding Judge,

1) Esperanza Alon Magistrate Judge
2) Esperanza Alon Magistrate Judge
Notes:
1) Judges were replaced following Dr
Zernik's initial request to inspect the
court file, with no clerical record,
documenting the legal foundation for
changing of the judges.
Date Opened June 1, 2010
March 13, 2013
Commencing June 1, 2010 Request for Appointment

Record
of Conservator, filed by Robert Zernik
[10]
Notes:
1) The Request is accompanied by a
false and deliberately misleading
affidavit, [4] claiming that:
a) The whereabouts of Dr Joseph
Zernik is unknown.
b) The Conservatee's brother, Prof
Eliyahu Shamir, provided his consent.
In fact, the filing of the Request was
deliberately kept secret from both Dr
Zernik and Prof Eliyahu Shamir
March 13, 2013 Request for Adding a

Conservator, filed by Robert Zernik,
where Dr Joseph Zernik is listed as
Respondent (Defendant) [2,]
Notes:
1) No summons was ever issued on Dr
Joseph Zernik, although the Court
purports that Dr Joseph Zernik is a party
to this case, out of compliance with the
law. [8]
2) The commencing paper fails to state a
law of the State of Israel, which is the
legal foundation for such new lawsuit.
3) The commencing paper is based on a
false and deliberately misleading, forged
record, purportedly signed by the
Conservatee in 2008, years after she had
been diagnosed as Alzheimer patient.
2) The filers refused to file that forged
paper in court, although they rely on it as
evidence, in blatant violation of the law.
[9]
Notable
Records
July 3, 2013 Response by the Responders

on Repeat Request for Inspection of Court
File, filed by Robert Zernik and Dror
Zernik [11]
Notes:
October 18, 2010 Social Worker

Report
Notes:
1) The Report includes false and
misleading statements. Such
7 See 6, above.
8 Civil Court Procedures 1984, Article 20 says: 20. Summons, signed by the Clerk of the Court, shall be served
immediately following the filing of the complaint to each defendant, together with a copy of the Complaint.
9 Civil Court Procedures - 1984, Article 75 says: 75. Parties shall indicate in their claims record, or in a list attached to
it, what the records are that the claims are based on, and shall attach them to the to the claims record.
10 10-06-01 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Request for Appointment of a
Conservator False and deliberately misleading Affidavit of Robert Zernik and Consent Letters by Dror Zernik and Uri
Zernik
11 13-07-03 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13 ) - Request for exemplary punitive measures, filed under the title, Response
by the Responders on Request to Inspect Court Records
3/8
Notable
Records
information was most likely fed to the

social worker by others, and the social
worker did not verify these facts. For
example:
a) That Dr Joseph Zernik has just
arrived in Israel (in fact he was living
in Israel for six months by then, and
b) That the Conservatee caught
Alzheimer's Disease in 2005. In fact,
she had shown various signs of senility
since the early 2000's, but final
diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease was
made only in 2005.
2) The Court refused to correct such
false and misleading record, even after
it was discovered and its falsehood
was pointed out to the Court.
1) Dror Zernik was added as a party on

this paper in this court file, with no legal
foundation.
2) The Response claims that Dr Joseph
Zernik is party to this court file, and at the
same time it argues that Dr Joseph Zernik
should be barred from inspection the court
file records in this court file.
3) The Response effectively is a request
for punitive measures against Dr Zernik,
but fails to be titled as a Request, and
was not registered as a Request.
4) The request for exemplary punitive
measures fails to state the law of the State
of Israel, pursuant to, such punitive
measures should be imposed.
November 23, 2010 Decree Appointing

a Conservator, issued by Presiding
Judge Ehud Rekem [13]
Notes:
1) The Chief Clerk of the Court refuses
to certify the Decree True Copy of the
Original.
2) The Decree record is out of
compliance with the law of the State of
Israel for the following reasons: [14]
a) The Decree record fails to comply
with the language of such decrees,
prescribed by the law: It omitted the
prescribed statements that the Decree
and the appointment were made
pursuant to the law of the State of
Israel.
b) The Decree fails to be marked by a
consecutive serial Number, as
prescribed by law.
c) The decree was not registered in the
Central Registry of Legally
Incompetent Persons, as prescribed by
law. (Final response still pending)
3) The Team Leader of the office of
Conservatorship Supervision in the
March 17, 2013 Two different and

contradictory Decisions by Judge
Esperanza Alon [12]
1) On March 17, 2013, Judge Esperanza
Alon issued 2 different and contradictory
decisions on the same matter. Both were
served by Counsel on Dr Joseph Zernik.
2) Counsel claimed that Decision A was
void, and was replaced by Decision B.
3) Unauthorized Court employee issued a
letter, claiming that Decision B was void,
and was replaced by Decision A.
4) Judge Alon refused to comment on the
question: Which of the two papers, A or B
is a valid court paper?
5) Through such false and deliberately
misleading conduct, attempt was made to
induce Dr Zernik to induce Dr Zernik to
appear in court on April 4, 2013, for a
hearing would be conducted under court
file 1829-06-10 on a Request that was
filed under court file 25607-03-13.
6) During the hearing on April 4, 2013,
counsel asked for imposition of sanctions
against Dr Zernik for failing to appear,
and Judge Alon never mentioned that the
1213-03-17 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Three (3) falsified decision records / simulated
service of process, received by certified mail from the Clerk of the Court and from Attorney Amos Zadika
13 10-11-23 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decree Appointing a
Conservator, issued by Presiding Judge Ehud Rekem evidence of Fraud on the Court
14 See copy of the relevant Regulations in 5, above.
4/8
Ministry of Justice has not responded

on requests for investigation of the
case. [15,16]
March 17, 2013 decision record to such

effect was an invalid court record, as later
claimed by court employee...
January 1, 2012 Request for Approval

of Real Estate Gift Agreements
1) As turned out much later, the entire
series of requests and decisions, which
led to the approval of the Gift
Agreements, were conducted absent
service or knowledge of the Counsel
for State Attorney, as required by law.
2) As turned out much later, there was
no Consent Letter by the Counsel for
State Attorney, as was falsely stated in
the Request and Affidavit.
December 26, 2012 Dr Joseph
Zernik's Request to Inspect court file,
and respective Decision by Judge
Ehud Rekem
1) A year and a half after the onset of
the process, and growing suspicions of
foul actions, Dr Joseph Zernik
requested and was granted permission
to inspect the court file.
2) Following Judge Rekem's decision,
only partial access was gained to
records in this court file, and their
falsehood was discovered for the first
time.
May 22, 2013 Repeat Request to Inspect

court file, and respective May 23, 2013
Decision by Judge Esperanza Alon [17,18,19]
1) Judge Alon repeatedly issued
decisions, which state that Dr Joseph
Zernik is permitted to inspect this court
file, out of transparency of the judicial
process and equality among parties.
2) In fact, when Dr Joseph Zernik
attempted to exercise such right, he was
denied access to the court file, and staff of
the Office of the Clerk informed him that
he was denied access by explicit
instructions of Judge Alon.
April 4, 2013 Protocol, issued by

Judge Esperanza Alon [24,25]
1) The protocol is false and misleading
on numerous accounts, starting with
July 3, 2013 et seq, Statements of

Disqualification for a cause of the Haifa
Magistrate Court in general and of Judge
Esperanza Alon in particular, filed by Dr
15 13-08-08 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) Letter to the Supervisor of Conservatorships, Ministry of
Justice, in re - November 23, 2010 Decree Appointing Conservator by Judge Ehud Rekem
16 13-08-09 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) Letter No 8 to Chief Clerk Israel Hen in re Request for
the Serial Number of the November 23, 2010 Decree Appointing Conservator by Judge Ehud Rekem.
17 13-05-22 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Repeat Requests to Inspect Court File
18 13-05-23 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court decision of Judge Esperanza Alon on Request to
Inspect Court File
19 13-06-20 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Declaration of Joseph Zernik in re - failed
attempt to inspect court file
5/8
false listing of the participants.

2) The protocol paper, as served by the
Court, is watermarked in large letters
unsigned.
2) Judge Alon refused to correct the
protocol record, even after its
falsehood was pointed out to her,
stating in a decision record that it
was immaterial, since the case was
closed.
Joseph Zernik [20,21,22 ,23]

The statements are based on:
1) Occupation of the office of Chief Clerk
by Mr Israel Hen with no appointment
record.
2) Issuance of false and deliberately
misleading, sham court records.
3) Violation of the fundamentals of Due
Process/Fair Hearings by Judge Esperanza
Alon, including, but not limited to denial
of access to court records to a person,who
is purported to be party to litigation.
Xxx Request to Inspect court file, and

respective xxx Decision by Judge
Esperanza Alon
Closing Date March 13, 2013
N/A
Dispositive
Record
None
Notes:
1) There is no record that explains the
legal foundation for closing this court
file and opening the court file under a
new court file number.
2) Opinion of the Counsel for State
Attorney is that the court files should
be combined, but such opinion was
and is ignored. [26]
N/A
Dr Joseph
Zernik's
Status
According to Judge Esperanza Alon Dr According to Judge Esperanza Alon Dr

Joseph Zernik is NOT a party to this
Joseph Zernik IS a party to this court file.
court file.
20 13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Declaration of Joseph Zernik:
Judge Esperanza Alon - master of the "mystical secrets of court procedure", or "obstructionist with impunity"? ???
21 13-07-25 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Statement of Disqualification
for a Cause of the Haifa Magistrate Court and of Magistrate Judge Esperanza Alon
23 13-08-11 In RE: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) - Supplemental Statement of Disqualification for a Cause of
the Haifa Magistrate Court - "Decree Appointing a Conservator" - simulated court record
24 13-04-04 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court false and deliberately misleading protocol of
court hearing by Judge Esperanza Alon
25 13-04-29 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Notice of false and misleading
April 4, 2013 Protocol TRANSLATE
26 13/03/24 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) Intermediate Response by Counsel for the State Attorney, opining combining of
the newly opened court file 25607-03-13 with the original court file - 1829-06-10. TRANSLATE
6/8
Service and
Notice
Dr Zernik is NOT served on a regular Dr Zernik is NOT served on a regular

basis the requests and decisions in this basis the requests and decisions in this
court file.
court file.
Dr Joseph
Zernik's
access to
court records
A.1) Following the December 26, 2012

Decision by Judge Ehud Rekem, Dr
Joseph Zernik was granted partial
access to the court file records
(requests, decisions).
2) Access to docket and/or list of
requests, decisions, parties, calendar,
signatures, etc was denied.
3) All decision records were provided
unsigned and unauthenticated.
B. 1) After December 2012, and
following decisions by Judge
Esperanza Alon Dr Zernik was and is
denied access to this court file. [28,29]
Disposition of
Requests for
Protection by
State
Authorities,
Judicial,
Executive,
Legislative
Branches
1) Requests for protection were filed

As shown on the left column.
with Counsel for State Attorney. [30]
No written response was provided.
Verbally, Counsel informed Dr Joseph
Zernik that they did not intend to
address his claims of Fraud on the
Court in instant court files.
2) Request for corrective actions
relative to similar conditions in the Tel
Aviv District Court and the Supreme
Court were filed with the State
Attorney General. [31,32] No response
was received to this date.
1) July 25, 2013 Decision by Judge

Esperanza Alon purportedly granted Dr
Joseph Zernik's request for inspection of
this court file, under transparency of the
judicial process and equality among
parties.
2) In fact, Dr Joseph Zernik was permitted
to obtain copies of some, but not all
decisions in this court file, but no other
records. Access to docket and/or list of
requests, decisions, parties, calendar,
requests, signatures, etc was and is denied.
[27]
3) Staff of the Office of the Clerk
informed Dr Zernik that denial of his
access was pursuant to specific
instructions by Judge Esperanza Alon.
28 13-06-20 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Repeat Request to Inspect Court File
29 13-07-02 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision of Judge Esperanza Alon denying the
June 20, 2013 Request to Inspect court file by the Conservatee's son Joseph Zernik
30 13-07-25 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court filing letter to the State
Attorney in re: Fraud under the guise of court actions
31 13-07-13 Online petition calls upon the Israeli Attorney General to instruct Israel Police to initiate criminal
investigation of Silman's claims of "obstruction of justice with impunity" in the Tel Aviv District Court.
32 13-08-05 Israel: Attorney General is asked to instruct Israel Police to launch criminal investigation of the Office of
the Clerk of the Supreme Court
7/8
3) Request for corrective actions was

filed with Chair of the Knesset's Law,
Constitution, Justice Committee. The
Chair refused to take any action. [33]
4) Request for corrective actions was
filed as a Petition in the Supreme
Court. The Petition was summarily
denied, albeit, the Judgment record
was served unsigned by the judicial
authorities, bearing a disclaimer
Subject to editing and phrasing
changes, with no authentication letter
by the Chief Clerk, and the Chief
Clerk refuses to certify the Judgment
record True Copy of the Original.
[34]
33 13-06-03 Request for establishing a Parliamentary Investigative Committee filed with members of the Knesset Law,
Constitution and Justice Committee
34 13-07-31 The Supreme Court of the State of Israel refuses to certify its own judgment records "True Copy of the
Original"
8/8
Table Summary No 2 Court file and related records of the Haifa Magistrate Court in re:
Conservatee Rivca Shami Zernik (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13)
In the early 2000s, while I was still residing in the US, my elderly mother started showing signs of
senility. In 2005, she was diagnosed as Alzheimer's Disease patient. Regardless, no legal action
was initiated to designate her legally incompetent, and as it turned out years later, during these years
.my father and my brother executed various legal records in her name
On June 1, 2010, five weeks after I escaped to Israel, legal action was filed for designating my
mother legally incompetent and appointing a conservator. Initially, attempt was made to keep this
court action secret from me and from her brother, my uncle, with whom I was staying at the time
.((according to Israeli law, all first degree relations had to be noticed
Eventually, I learned about this action, and during the following couple of years, my suspicions
grew that such action was directed against me. Therefore, in December 2012, I filed request to
inspect the respective court file in the Haifa Magistrate Court, and I gained partial access.
Review of the records affirmed my suspicions. False and deliberately misleading records were
discovered, which were biased against me, starting with the commencing record, which stated that I
.was nowhere to be found, and therefore, could not consent to the process
Regardless of my efforts, the Court refused to correct any of the false and deliberately misleading
records. Moreover, once I discovered the records, the Court initiated actions, which are inconsistent
:with any notion of Fair Hearings
The original court file was declared closed, and a second court file was purportedly
commenced on the same matter. In the second court file, I was purportedly named
Respondent (Defendant), but no summons was ever issued, and no law of the State of
Israel was indicated as the foundation for such action.
I am not permitted to inspect the court file records in either court file.
Some of the Court's decision were not served on me, the purported Respondent, and I am
not permitted to inspect them, even after repeated requests. Neither am I permitted to
inspect the list of decisions (docket).
To this date, all judicial records, which have been served on me were unsigned by the
judicial authority and were accompanied by unsigned authentication letters by an unnamed
Clerk.
The Chief Clerk of the Court has refused to certify any of the court records in these court
files True Copy of the Original.
It should be noted that I have never appeared in court in person, neither through an attorney under
either court file. Instead, I have repeatedly filed papers, indicating the false and misleading nature
.of the Court's actions, and consequent disqualification of the court
A reasonable person, upon review of the records, will surely conclude that the Haifa Magistrate
Court and others were and are engaged in the conduct of sham litigation in this matter, in violation
.of key articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Once I advertised the nature of the Court's conduct, request was filed for exemplary punitive
actions against me, now purportedly pending before the Court.
#
Record and link

1.
10-06-01 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Request for
Appointment of a Conservator False and deliberately misleading Affidavit of Robert Zernik and
Consent Letters by Dror Zernik and Uri Zernik
2.
10-11-23 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decree
Appointing a Conservator, issued by Presiding Judge Ehud Rekem
( 25607-03-13 - 1829-06-10) 10-11-23
1/6

3.
12-01-01 In RE: RSZ (1829-06-10 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Request for Approval of Gift
Agreements TRANSLATE
.( 1829-06-10) 12-01-01
4.
12-12-25 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision of Judge Ehud Rekem
on Request to Inspect court file TRANSLATE
( 1829-06-10) 12-12-25

/http://www.scribd.com/doc/160946959
5.
13-02-14 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision of Judge Esperanza
Alon on Conservator's Request to stay discovery of the same date
6.
13-02-14 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision of Judge Esperanza
Alon on Position of the Attorneys Office, Ministry of Justice, setting hearing date April 4, 2013
7.
13-02-19 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Letter No 1 to Chief Clerk Israel
Hen - Request for certificates of service of court decisions
8.
13-02-24 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Response by Chief Clerk Israel
Hen on Letter No 1- Request for certificates of service of court decisions TRANSLATE
9.
13-02-24 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Letter No 2 to Chief Clerk Israel
Hen - Request for certification of court decisions and production of his appointment record
" " 2 '( 1829-06-10) 13-02-24

http://www.scribd.com/doc/130524715
10. 13-03-10 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court: Letter to Atty Ofer Ben-Ari, in RE:
Request for clarification regarding attorney's conduct
11. 13-03-13 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Request to Add Dror Zernik as
Conservator for Conservatee RSZ
( 25607-03-13) 13-03-13
. "
12. 13-03-14 In RE: RSZ (1829-06-10 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No 3 to Chief Clerk
Israel Hen, in RE - Inspection of dockets, and undated, unsigned Request records by Attorney
Offer Ben Ari
13. 13-03-14 Chief Clerk of the Haifa, Israel, Magistrate Court refuses to certify his own Court's
decisions
14. 13-03-14 In RE: RSZ (1829-06-10 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Response by Chief Clerk
Israel Hen, on Letter No 3,in RE - Inspection of dockets, and undated, unsigned Request records
by Attorney Offer Ben Ari
15. 13-03-17 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Request to add a
conservator, with March 17, 2013 Decision by Judge Esperanza Alon, as received from Attorney
2/6
Amos Zadika
16. 13-03-17 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Three (3) falsified decision
records / simulated service of process, received by certified mail from the Clerk of the Court and
from Attorney Amos Zadika
17. 13-03-24 RE: RSZ (25607-03-13 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No 4 to Chief Clerk
Israel Hen, in RE - conflicting, unreasonable court orders dated March 17, 2013 by Judge
Esperanza Alon
18. 13-03-24 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) Intermediate Response by Counsel for the State Attorney,
opining combining of the newly opened court file 25607-03-13 with the original court file 1829-06-10. TRANSLATE
( 25607-03-13) 13-03-24
- 25607-03-13 - , ,
.1829-06-10
19. 13-03-28 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision by Judge Alon,
instructing adding all Conservatee's children to the case, and for Social Worker review
TRANSLATE
( 25607-03-13) 13-03-28

20. 13-04-02 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Declaration of
Joseph Zernik in re: corrections to false and misleading June 1, 2010 Affidavit of Robert Zernik
21. 13-04-02 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Declaration of
Joseph Zernik in re: Request to add a conservator
22. 13-04-04 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court false and deliberately
misleading protocol of court proceeding by Judge Esperanza Alon
23. 13-04-07 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Amended
Request to Add Dror Zernik as Conservator

( 25607-03-13 - 1829-06-10) 13-04-07

24. 13-04-07 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Decision of Judge Esperanza
Alon on Amended Request to Add Dror Zernik as Conservator setting dates TRANLATE
( 25607-03-13 - 1829-06-10) 13-04-07

25. 13-04-21 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No 5 to
Chief Clerk Israel Hen, in RE inspection of court file, certification of court records, appointment
record of the Chief Clerk TRANSLATE
26. 13-04-29 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Notice of
false and deliberately misleading April 7, 2013 Request to Add Dror Zernik as Conservator
27. 13-04-29 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Notice of
3/6
false and misleading April 4, 2013 Protocol TRANSLATE

28. 13-04-29 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Request to inspect court file
Alon on Request to Inspect Court File - transparency and equality among parties, but no screen
prints TRANSLATE
( 25607-03-13) 13-05-02

Alon on Amended Request to Add Dror Zernik as Conservator Setting Hearing Date July 10,
2013 TRANSLATE
( 25607-03-13) 13-05-02

/http://www.scribd.com/doc/160944990
31. 13-05-06 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision of Judge Esperanza
Alon on a) False and deliberately misleading April 4, 2013 Protocol, and b) Notice of obstructionist
conduct "mystical secrets of court procedures"
32. 13-05-19 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No 6 to
Chief Clerk Israel Hen, in RE certification of court records, appointment record of the Chief
Clerk
33. 13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Declaration of
Joseph Zernik: Judge Esperanza Alon - master of the "mystical secrets of court procedure", or
"obstructionist with impunity"?
( 25607-03-13 - 1829-06-10) 13-04-02
?" " " " :
34. 13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Repeat Requests to Inspect
Court Files
35. 13-05-22 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Repeat Requests to Inspect
Court File
36. 13-05-23 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court decision of Judge Esperanza
Alon on Request to Inspect Court File
37. 13-05-26 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Judge Esperanza Alon's
decision on notice of obstructionist conduct in the Court.
38. 13-06-11 Family News
39. 13-06-20 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Repeat notice of obstructionist
conduct in the Court
40. 13-06-20 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Declaration of Joseph Zernik in
re - failed attempt to inspect court file
4/6
41. 13-06-20 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Repeat Request to Inspect
Court File
42. 13-06-20 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Response by the Requester to
Inspect on Judge Alon's May 23, 2013 Decision in re inspection of court file.
43. 13-07-01 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13 ) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision of Judge Esperanza
Alon on request to clarification regarding party status of Conservatee's son Joseph Zernik
44. 13-07-02 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision of Judge Esperanza
Alon denying the June 20, 2013 Request to Inspect court file by the Conservatee's son Joseph
Zernik
45. 13-07-03 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13 ) - Request for exemplary punitive measures, filed under the
title, Response by the Responders on Request to Inspect Court Records

( 25607-03-13 - 1829-06-10) 13-07-03
""" "
46. 13-07-25 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Statement of
Disqualification for a Cause of the Haifa Magistrate Court and of Magistrate Judge Esperanza
Alon
( 25607-03-13 - 1829-06-10) 13-07-25

http://www.scribd.com/doc/156534241
47. 13-07-25 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court filing letter to
the State Attorney in re: Fraud under the guise of court actions
48. 13-07-28 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Letter to Dror
Zernik in re: Certificate of Counsel of Record by Attorney Amos Zadika
49. 13-07-29 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Judge Alon's Decision on
Statement of Disqualification asking for Responses by the parties.

( 25607-03-13) 13-07-29
. ""
Filing of Letter to Counsel for State Attorney, which asked to end sham litigation Set date for
hearing on September 17 TRANSLATE
( 25607-03-13) 13-07-29
. 17- "
Filing of Consent by Uri Zernik serve on parties TRANSLATE

( 25607-03-13) 13-07-29
-
52. 13-08-08 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) Letter to the Supervisor of
Conservatorships, Ministry of Justice, in re - November 23, 2010 Decree Appointing Conservator
5/6
by Judge Ehud Rekem

53. 13-08-08 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) Letter No 7 to Chief Clerk Israel Hen in re
court fees
54. 13-08-09 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) Letter No 8 to Chief Clerk Israel Hen in re
Request for the Serial Number of the November 23, 2010 Decree Appointing Conservator by
Judge Ehud Rekem.
55. 13-08-10 In RE: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - letter to
Attorney Amos Zadika, Robert Raffael Zernik, and Dror Zernik - request for correction of invalid
court records, alternatively - ceasing fraud attempts in the Court. TRANSLATE
56. 13-08-11 In RE: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) - Supplemental Statement of
Disqualification for a Cause of the Haifa Magistrate Court - "Decree Appointing a Conservator" simulated court record
( 25607-03-13 - 1829-06-10) 13-08-11
" " -
57. 13-08-13 Israeli Human Rights activist asks the UN for protection against the Israeli courts
" 13-08-13
6/6

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD

)Human Rights Alert (NGO

Joseph Zernik, PhD

Bilingual filing English follows the Hebrew

)Human Rights Alert (NGO

Joseph Zernik, PhD

Bilingual filing English follows the Hebrew

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD

2016-05-14 Biographical Sketch Joseph Zernik, PhD

Dr Zernik also writes on current affairs, often for OpEdNews.com.

1) Information Systems, E-government, Socio-economic Development and Civil

Zernik, J. When it comes to the First Amendment - Israel scores an "F",

ARGENTINA: Again on the verge of economic collapse - again the victim of US

Wiki Nerds, "Machine Learning", Google books

HRA-NGO Submission - as it appears on the UN HRC site

2012-03-15 PRESS RELEASE: Evidence of widespread corruption of the US courts and

2011-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER

2009-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir, Department of Computer Science, Hebrew University,

2013-07-26 Shamir, E and Zernik J, Keeper of the Last Mosque Haaretz

Epilogue by Joseph Zernik, Nouvelles d'Hebron by Yitzhaq Shami (2006)

God of Abraham God of Vengeance? By Joseph Zernik Haaretz, Sefarim (2005)

Schaustelle Tel Aviv Berlin, Goethe Institue (2014)

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

2012-05-31 Decision (88/12/Tel-Aviv District) by Ombudsman of the Judiciary

[coat of arms state of israel]

1. Attorney Effy Naveh, Chairman of the Tel-Aviv & Center

Subject of the Complaints: The Hon Judge Varda Alshech

Complaints received on 2012-01-26; 2012-02-02; 2012-02-07;

37. Obviously, absent an electronically signed Protocol, Version A, which was

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Human Rights Alert, NGO

13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Haifa

12-13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Haifa Magistrate

2 13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Haifa Magistrate

Court Declaration of the Conservatee's son in re: Judge Esperanza Alon

Court Declaration of the Conservatee's son in re: Judge Esperanza Alon

In the Haifa Family Court

" . " - " :

.13 "" "" .

der Bundesrepublih: Deutschland

Human Rights Alert (

Joseph Zernik, PhD

August zz, Z013

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

August 22, 2013

split one matter into two court file

Haifa Magistrate Court

Copy of the Original. [7]

1) Ehud Rekem Presiding Judge,

Date Opened June 1, 2010

March 13, 2013

Commencing June 1, 2010 Request for Appointment

March 13, 2013 Request for Adding a

July 3, 2013 Response by the Responders

October 18, 2010 Social Worker

information was most likely fed to the

1) Dror Zernik was added as a party on

November 23, 2010 Decree Appointing

March 17, 2013 Two different and

Ministry of Justice has not responded

March 17, 2013 decision record to such

January 1, 2012 Request for Approval

May 22, 2013 Repeat Request to Inspect

April 4, 2013 Protocol, issued by