Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
8. Do not consent to giving the statement under oath. You are generally not
required to be placed under oath before giving a statement. Object to it. There
are many reasons not to give a statement under oath. If the employer insists
on it, ask them why the statement must be under oath and be sure to state on
the record that you objected to being placed under oath.
9. If you are placed under oath and then asked questions, use extreme
caution in giving answers. You could be charged with perjury if you give
answers that you knew or should have known are untrue. Also, statements
given under oath are usually admissible in court. Statements that are not
under oath are usually inadmissible. So being placed under oath may allow
the employer to use your statement in ways that would surprise you. You
should use great precision in giving your answers.
10.
Do not agree with facts the investigator or interviewer tells you
unless you independently know them to be true.
Just as some law
enforcement interrogators will plant false facts and ask the subject to agree,
so will HR and EEO interviewers. They may present facts as if they were
obvious for the purpose of making you feel foolish if you dont agree. (You
knew Mike was giving people a hard time and using profanity, right? Right?)
If you dont know something to be true, you must say so. Otherwise you will
be stuck with your answer for all time. Many investigators plant facts in a
witness mind because they know that many people will simply agree with
something that sounds reasonable and that is presented in a forceful manner
even if the investigator knows you have no idea whether it is true or not. But
once you agree with it, you are stuck with your answer.
11.
Do not let the investigator reword your comments. Most interviewers
or investigators with your HR and EEO departments are skilled in the wording
used to create or destroy claims against the employer. If you believe you or
others have been the victim of discrimination, say so. Often, for example, an
HR interviewer will pressure you to stop using the word discrimination, and
try to get you to use word like conflicts or disagreements or management
styles. You should assume there is a reason for any effort to change the way
you describe things. Dont let anyone put words in your mouth. Describe
things as you see them. If you feel the investigator is pressuring you to
rephrase things, say so on the record (e.g., I dont know why you keep
pushing me to describe it as a personality conflict. It wasnt a personality
conflict. The boss was harassing Andrea because of her race and that was
quite clear to me. It wasnt a personality conflict at all and I wish you would
not keep changing what I am telling you.)
12.
If you can better answer questions by looking at documents, say so
on the record. Often, we provide more accurate answers to a question if we
have the chance to look at documents. Internal investigators may pressure
you to answer questions even though you cannot look up documents. If that
happens, you can say something like I cant give you an accurate answer on
that, and I will not give you a guess, without looking at the documents. Can I
look at them? If not, why not? Dont you want the best answer I can give
you?).
13.
If - after your interview is over - you think of other information that
will clarify your answers, send an email immediately to the investigator
with the additional information. Some investigators will turn on you if it
suits them. They may claim you gave false answers even though it was a
simple mistake of memory. This is why it is so critical that you ask for time to
think about the topics before you begin the interview and, if not allowed time,
that you make it clear repeatedly during the recorded interview that you were
not given notice of the interview and were not given a chance to look at
documents.
14.
If the interviewer tells you that you are not permitted to talk to
anyone else about the interview or subject of the investigation, ask why.
At least one federal agency that deals with workplace investigations has ruled
that an employer may generally not forbid you employees from talking about
current investigations. The National Labor Relations Board ruled in 2012 that
except in unusual circumstances, an employer may not prevent employees
from speaking to each other about the subject of internal investigations. Such
an instruction may itself be a violation of your rights under federal law.
15.
Consider calling an employee rights lawyer for guidance if you have
the chance. Most employee-rights lawyers, me included, will speak to you for
free by phone and without an appointment. If youre ambushed, or even if
youre given a day or two to prepare, dont hesitate to call an employee-rights
lawyer for help. Your employer has an army of HR, EEO and other advisors,
not to mention lawyers. Its smart to get your own.
16.
Dont assume that your statement will remain confidential. Beware
of promises that what you say will remain private. That is rarely true. If your
employer is a city, county, state or federal agency, it will certainly become
public at some point. That means that the person you talk about will be able
to read what you said. It also means that the news media may be able to
publish your statement. If there is a dispute that winds up in court, lawyers
will obtain it as well, and may grill you about misstatements later. Think
ahead.
17.
Remember that in most cases, HR, EEO and other employer
representatives are not there to help you. The employer is paying them for
a reason to protect the employer. Many employees wrongfully assume the
HR office is a friend. In some cases that may be true. But in the
overwhelming number of circumstances, HR and other officials are your
adversary in every way, even if they act friendly and appear to appreciate your
input. And they are unlikely to come to you wind up being sued because of
something you said.