Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Bacillus thuringiensis was recovered from forest soil sprayed two years previously with B.
thuringiensis for gypsy moth control by amplifying the bacteria found in the soil on bacterial agar and
feeding this mixed microbial population to tobacco hornworm larvae. These bacteria killed the larvae
when fed on artificial diet. Most of the bacteria recovered from dead insects formed spores and
belonged to the Bacillus cereus group (14) including three B. thuringiensis and one B.
weihenstephanensis. All the B. thuringiensis strains and most of the B. cereus strains were closely
related (<0.001 substitutions/site in the 16S rDNA) to the strain that was sprayed. Ten B. cereus sensu
lato strains differed from the B. thuringiensis strain applied by five or fewer, of the 24 traits tested. The
toxicity to gypsy moth larvae of the three B. thuringiensis strains isolated was similar to the applied B.
thuringiensis strain. Thus, amplification of bacteria present in soil in combination with an insect
susceptible to this strain can recover insect toxic strains that are related to an applied strain.
Keywords: Gypsy
moth,
biological
control,
16S
rDNA
gene
sequences
INTRODUCTION
Bacillus thuringiensis has been applied to many locations
repeatedly over many years to control periodic outbreaks
of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (Sharov et al., 2002,
APHIS factsheet 2003). Although there are techniques
that can recover B. thuringiensis from the environment
(Ohba and Aizawa, 1986, Travers et al., 1987), they rely
on isolating the bacteria first and then testing for toxicity.
However, an alternative method can be developed
around assay of mixed cultures grown directly from soil.
When the bacteria occur at low levels, it is often
necessary to have an enrichment step to detect the
bacteria
of interest.
Traditionally
this
has
Involved the use of selective media (Akiba and Katoh
RESULTS
Bacteria grown from various soil samples and fed to M.
sexta killed the larvae within 48 h. Larval mortality was
100% for 17 of 20 samples. While the initial bacterial
concentration applied to diet pellets was high, the larvae
did not noticeably consume any of the diet pellets before
they died. The bacterial concentration averaged 1.11+/0.82 x108cfu (colony forming units)/ diet pellet and ranged
from 9.9 x 106 to 3.0 x 108cfu/ diet pellet. The number of
bacteria recovered from various larvae averaged 3.02 +/2.6 x 107 cfu/larva and ranged from 5.0 x105 to 8.2
x107cfu/larva. For most larvae only a single colony type
was obtained. For others, one colony type predominated.
The major colony type was isolated, characterized by
phenotypic tests and fed to other M. sexta larvae. One
sample (10) had two colony types of approximately the
same numbers. One type made round spores that
swelled the sporangia and the other type made oval
spores and a bipyramidal crystal. Only the bacteria
which had 100% mortality when refed made crystals.
Bacteria (15 of 20) recovered from dead larvae from the
second round were found to be identical in phenotype to
the bacteria isolated initially. Once a pure culture was
isolated it was assigned a strain designation. These
strains were identified to species by 16S rDNA
sequencing.
Relatedness based on 16S rDNA genes
Putative identities based on nearly full 16S rRNA genes
showed that 14 strains belonged to the Bacillus cereus
species complex (Figure 1). Three strains (IBL 1056, IBL
1067, IBL 1445) also formed bipyramidal crystals upon
sporulation (from three different samples 10, 8, and 18)
and were identified as B. thuringiensis. Another spore
former, IBL 1077 (from sample 5), was identified as B.
weihenstephanensis and grew at 4 C. A third spore
forming strain (IBL10B1445), which was co- isolated with
crystal forming IBL 1445, formed spherical to oval spores
that swelled the sporangia and was identified as
Lysinibacillus fusiformis (Ahmed et al., 2007).
The relatedness of these strains based on their 16S
rRNA genes are shown in Figure 1. The B. thuringiensis
and the B. cereus strains clustered closely together
differing by fewer than 5 bases in approximately a 1400
base sequence. Therefore a method for more precisely
differentiating stains was needed.
Relatedness based on phenotypes
Phenotypes (substrate utilization and antibiotic resistance
profiles) were chosen to distinguish the strains in the B.
Figure1: Dendrogram showing the relationship of Bacillus strains isolated from dead
larvae to known B. thuringiensis strains
Table 1: Phenotypes of Bacillus cereus group strains recovered (bold) applied (highlighted) and control strains
Soil no.
10
8
18
12
21
11
19
16
17
14
7
1
9
5
IBL no
451
1445
1067
1056
1050
1439
1075
1058
1078
1080
1054
1065
1048
1068
1077
T
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
L
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
U
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
S
+
+
A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
control
control
control
10003
1410
455
+
+
+
+ - - - - - + - + + - + +
R
S
R
S
S
S
S
I
S
S S S
S S I
S S S
tet
S
I
I
S
I
S
I
S
S
S
I
S
S
R
S
S
S
R
kan Species
R
Bt
I
Bt
R
Bt
S
Bt
I
Bc
S
Bc
I
Bc
S
Bc
S
Bc
I
Bc
I
Bc
I
Bc
S
Bc
S
Bc
I
Bw
I
I
I
Bt
Bt
Bt
Phenotype
TL
TLU
TLAE
TLUAE*
Null (0)
Total of all phenotypes**
Bt
176
82
50
23
7
725
% total Bt
24.3
11.3
6.9
3.2
1.0
REFERENCES
Akiba Y, Katoh K (1986). Microbial ecology of Bacillus thuringiensis V.
Selective medium for Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative cells. Appl.
Entomol. Zool. 21: 210215.
Ahmed I, Yokota A, Yamazoe A, Fujiwara T (2007). Proposal of
Lysinibacillus boroitolerans gen. nov. sp. nov., and transfer of
Bacillus fusiformis to Lysinibacillus fusiformis comb. nov. and Bacillus
sphaericus to Lysinibacillus sphaericus comb. nov. Intern. J. Syst.
Evol. Microbiol. 57:117-1125.
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990). Basic
local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
Andrzejczak S, Lonc E (2008). Selective isolation of Bacillus
thuringiensis from soil by the use of L-serine as a minimal media
supplement. Pol. J. Microbiol. 57:333-335.
APHIS factsheet (2003). Gypsy moth: slow the spread.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/5427202/APHIS-Plant-Protection-andQuarantine-Factsheet-April Gypsy-Moth. Accessed February 4, 2010.
Atlas RM (2004). Handbook of microbiological media. Third edition.
CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, FL. Pp 904.
Bell RA, Owens CD, Shapiro M, Tardif JGR (1981). Development of
mass rearing technology, in The gypsy moth: Research toward
integrated pest management (Doane CC, McManus ML, Eds.) U.S.
Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1584, Washington, pp
599-633.
Bizzarri MF, AH Bishop (2007). Recovery of Bacillus thuringiensis in
vegetative form from the phylloplane of clover (Trifolium hybridum)
during a growing season. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 94: 38-47.
Grohmann E, Muth G, Espinosa M (2003). Conjugative plasmid transfer
in Gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67: 277-301.
Juarez-Perez VM, Ferrandis MD, Frutos R (1997). PCR-based
approach for detection of novel Bacillus thuringiensis cry genes. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 63:29973002.
Lee IM, Hammond RW, Davis RE, Gundersen DE (1993). Universal
amplification and analysis of pathogen 16S rDNA for classification
and identification of mycoplasma like organisms. Mol. Plant Pathol.
83: 834-842.
Martin PAW, Haransky EB, Travers RS, Reichelderfer CF (1985). Rapid
biochemical testing of large numbers of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates
using agar dots. BioTechniques 3:386-392.
Martin PAW, Travers RS (1989). Worldwide abundance and distribution
of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55: 24372442.
Martin PAW (2004). A freeze-dried diet to test pathogens of Colorado
Priest FG, Barker M, Baillie LWJ, Holmes EC, Maiden MCJ (2004).
Population structure and evolution of the Bacillus cereus group J.
Bacteriol. 186: 79597970.
SAS Institute Inc. (2008). SAS OnlineDoc7. Version 9.1. SAS Institute
Inc. Cary, NC.
Sharov AA, Leonard D, Liebhold AM, Clemens NS (2002). Evaluation of
preventive treatments in low-density gypsy moth populations using
pheromone traps. J. Econ. Entomol. 95: 1205-1215.
Silva CP, Waterfield NR, J Daborn P, Dean P, Chilver T, Au CPY,
Sharma S, Potter U, Reynolds SE, ffrench-Constant RH (2002).
Bacterial infection of a model insect: Photorhabdus luminescens and
Manduca sexta. Cell Microbiol. 4: 329-339.
Travers RS, Martin PAW, Reichelderfer CF (1987). Selective process
for efficient isolation of soil Bacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:1263-1266