Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
6:00
De Jesus, Fe
2016
Jimena, Pam
S, 3:00April
2,
IV-BSBAM
Facts
Efren Castaneda retired from government service as Revenue
Attach in the Philippine Embassy, London, England. Upon
retirement, he received benefits such as the terminal leave pay. The
Commissioner of Internal Revenue withheld P12, 557 allegedly
representing that it was tax income. Castaneda filed for a refund,
contending that the cash equivalent of his terminal leave is exempt
from income tax.
II.
Issue
The issue is whether or not terminal leave pay received by a
government official or employee on the occasion of his compulsory
retirement from the government service is subject to withholding
(income) tax.
III.
Held
The Solicitor General contends that the terminal leave is based
from an employer-employee relationship. That as part of the
services rendered by the terminal leave pay is part of the gross
income of the recipient.
Cited the Section 28 of the National Internal Revenue Code:
". . It (terminal leave pay) cannot be viewed as salary for purposes
which would reduce it. . . . there can thus be no commutation of
salary when a government retiree applies for terminal leave
-because he is not receiving it as salary. What he applies for is a
commutation of leave credits. It is an accumulation of credits
intended for old age or separation from service...."
The Court of Tax Appeals ruled in favor of Castaneda and
ordered the refund while the Court of Appeals affirmed decision of
CTA.
The Court has already ruled that the terminal leave pay received by
a government official or employee is not subject to withholding
(income) tax.
Sources:
http://thepinoycivilservant.com/2014/09/12/terminal-leave-benefit/
http://www.chanrobles.com/legal6nationalinternalrevenuecodeof1997.html#.Vs7F2YcG03
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1991octoberdecisions.php?id=797