Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
doi:10.1093/bja/aet379
complications;
paediatric
anaesthesia,
The Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN), a multicentre collaborative effort, has facilitated the collection of
detailed prospective data for research and quality improvement. Polaner and colleagues10 recently reported on the first
3 yr of data registry, giving an overall favourable impression
of the safety of modern paediatric regional anaesthesia practice (Table 1).
& The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.
For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
BJA
Table 1 Summary of Single-injection blocks and adverse event rates for all centres. Total adverse event rates reported in parentheses. Rates ,1%
reported as decimals and .1% rounded to nearest whole number. Note that in the neuraxial category and the lower extremity category, the total
number of complications are fewer than the cumulative sums of the individual types. This is because there were 3 cases in which 2 blocks were done
in a single patient, 1 successful block after a complication in the other, and because of ambiguity in the data entry, it was impossible to determine
which block was placed first. To assign the most conservative complication rate to the specific block category, the complication was counted
against both blocks, but the total number of complications in that general block type is accurate. See text for more details. There were no serious
complications or sequelae reported in any single-injection group. TAP, transversus abdominis plane. Table reproduced from Polaner and
colleagues10 with permission from Lippincott Williams and Wilkins/Wolters Kluwer Health (&2012)
Total procedures
No sequelae
No sequelaechange in treatment
Caudal
6011
172 (3)
60
112
Lumbar
103
5 (5)
Thoracic
13
2 (15)
Neuraxial
Subarachnoid
Total neuraxial
83
5 (6)
6210
183 (3)
64
119
6 (4)
4
0
Upper Extremity
Interscalene
80
164
Infraclavicular
40
Axillary
99
2 (2)
Musculocutaneous
Elbow
Wrist
Other
58
Total
455
8 (2)
78
Supraclavicular
Lower Extremity
Lumbar plexus
6 (8)
Fascia iliaca
221
1 (0.5)
Femoral
872
6 (0.7)
Sciatic
413
11
Popliteal fossa
319
Saphenous
78
14 (3)
2 (0.6)
Other
325
5 (2)
Total
2307
33 (1)
11
22
0
58
Infraorbital
139
157
Occipital
101
11
Other
89
Total
556
39
Greater palatine
Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric
737
3 (0.4)
Rectus sheath
294
Paravertebral
1 (7)
Penile
230
14
TAP
140
1 (0.7)
Other
395
Total
1849
5 (0.3)
i115
BJA
Initial bolus
Infusion solution
Infusion limits
Bupivicaine
2.5 3 mg kg21
0.0625 0. 1%
Ropivicaine
2.5 3 mg kg21
0.1 0. 2%
Fentanyl
1 2 mg kg21
2 5 mg ml21
Morphine
10 30 mg kg21
5 10 mg ml21
1 5 mg kg21 h21
Hydromorphone
2 6 mg kg21
2 5 mg ml21
Clonidine
1 2 mg kg21
0.5 1 mg ml21
i116
BJA
Dose (ml
kg21)
0.1
Axillary
0.1 0.2
10
Infraclavicular
0.2 0.3
15
Intercostal
0.05 0.1
Rectus sheath
0.1 0.2
Ilioinguinal
0.1 0.2
10
Femoral nerve
0.2 0.3
15
Sciatic nerve
0.2 0.3
20
Popliteal fossa
0.2 0.3
15
Lumbar plexus
0.2 0.3
20
Penile
0.1
10
Digital nerve
0.05 0.1
5
10 (per side)
Axillary block
Anatomy and indications
i117
Block technique
BJA
SCM
UN
MN
C5
AA
C6
RN
C7
ASM
MSM
Fig 1 Axillary nerve block sonoanatomy. MN, median nerve; AA, axillary artery; UN, ulnar nerve; RN, radial nerve.
Complications
Interscalene block
Anatomy and indications Analgesia of the shoulder and
proximal humerus is achieved by blocking the brachial plexus
at the level of the interscalene groove. At this site, the trunks
and roots of the brachial plexus lie posterior to the
sternocleidomastoid muscle and are situated between the
anterior and middle scalene muscles. The C5, C6, and C7
nerve roots are easily seen between the anterior and middle
scalene muscles using this approach.
Technique The ultrasound probe is positioned in the transverse
oblique plane at the level of the cricoid cartilage at the lateral
border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (Fig. 2). The
anterior and middle scalene muscles, which make up the
interscalene groove, lie deep to the sternocleidomastoid
muscle and lateral to the subclavian artery. The hyperechoic
structures that comprise the neurovascular bundle of the C5,
C6, and C7 nerve roots are contained within this groove.
Nerve stimulation can be used to guide local anaesthetic
delivery to the brachial plexus at this level; however,
ultrasound guidance might decrease the required total
amount of local anaesthetic.52 53
Complications
Supraclavicular block
Anatomy and indications The supraclavicular approach,
which provides analgesia to the upper arm and elbow, facilitates
i118
Infraclavicular block
Anatomy and indications
BJA
Technique A lateral approach for performing the ultrasoundguided infraclavicular block is described in the paediatric
literature.56 The ultrasound probe is positioned in a transverse
orientation below the clavicle to identify the brachial plexus.
The needle is inserted inferior to the probe and advanced
using an out-of-plane technique. The needle is directed lateral
to the cords of the brachial plexus; careful attention is needed
to avoid vascular structures as the local anaesthetic is
deposited into the deeper portions of the neurovascular
sheath. De Jose Maria and colleagues55 described an
alternative technique in which the probe is positioned parallel
to the clavicle in a parasagittal plane, and the needle is
directed cephalad towards the brachial plexus.
EO
IO
TA
Complications
Truncal blocks
The frequent use of ultrasonography has increased the success
and safety of truncal blocks in paediatric regional anaesthesia
practice. The emerging role of minimally invasive surgical techniques in children has expanded the spectrum of patients that
benefit from these blocks.
i119
BJA
Anterior
EO
IO
Sartorius
IL/IH
TA
SN
Posterior
Technique
Complications
Complications
i120
BJA
Complications
Paravertebral block
Anatomy and indications
Cephalad
Needle
Transverse process
at T3
Pleura
Paravertebral
space
Superior costotransverse ligament
Complications
Complications include infection, haematoma, and retroperitoneal bleeding because of the location
of the plexus.
i121
BJA
Complications
Discussion
The practice of paediatric regional anaesthesia has made tremendous strides in recent years. Advances in ultrasonography
and precise dosing regimens have facilitated widespread applications of regional anaesthetic techniques in infants, children,
and adolescents. Prospective studies indicate that these techniques can be safely performed and positively impact on the
outcomes of paediatric patients undergoing painful procedures and those who suffer from chronic pain. Large prospective databases in the USA and Europe will allow ongoing
monitoring of regional techniques in children and allow meaningful decisions regarding their safety and efficacy.
R.D.S. and S.S.: responsible for the conception of this review, interpretation of the data, drafting the review, and final approval
of the published version.
Declaration of interest
None declared.
Funding
None.
References
1 Johr M. Practical pediatric regional anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesth
2013; 26: 327 32
2 Good practice in postoperative and procedural pain management,
2nd edn. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22 Suppl 1: 1 79
3 Ecoffey C. Local anesthetics in pediatric anesthesia: an update.
Minerva Anestesiol 2005; 71: 357 60
4 Ecoffey C. Safety in pediatric regional anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth
2012; 22: 25 30
5 Giaufre E, Dalens B, Gombert A. Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a one-year prospective survey of
the French-Language Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists.
Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 90412
6 Berde C, Greco C. Pediatric regional anesthesia: drawing inferences
on safety from prospective registries and case reports. Anesth Analg
2012; 115: 1259 62
7 Bernards CM, Hadzic A, Suresh S, Neal JM. Regional anesthesia in
anesthetized or heavily sedated patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med
2008; 33: 449 60
8 Krane EJ, Dalens BJ, Murat I, Murrell D. The safety of epidurals placed
during general anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23: 433 8
9 Llewellyn N, Moriarty A. The national pediatric epidural audit. Paediatr Anaesth 2007; 17: 520 33
10 Polaner DM, Taenzer AH, Walker BJ, et al. Pediatric regional anesthesia network (PRAN): a multi-institutional study of the use and incidence of complications of pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesth
Analg 2012; 115: 135364
i122
Authors contributions
i123
BJA
BJA
70
71
72
73
i124