Apori 201510 S 6476 Combined 3 Year Education Plan and Aerr

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School
Combined 3 Year Education Plan

and
AERR Report for Catholic Central High School
October, 2015
Page 1
Combined 2015 Accountability Pillar Overall Summary

Measure Category
Safe and Caring Schools
Student Learning
Opportunities
Student Learning
Achievement (Grades K-9)
Student Learning
Achievement (Grades 10-12)
Preparation for Lifelong

Learning, World of Work,
Citizenship
Measure Category
Evaluation
Excellent
Excellent
n/a
Good
Good
Catholic Central High

School
Alberta
Current
Result
Prev
Year
Result
Prev
Year
Result
Prev 3
Year
Average
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
Safe and Caring
93.4
87.8
88.2
89.2
89.1
88.9
Very High
Improved
Significantly
Excellent
Program of Studies
85.9
86.2
83.1
81.3
81.3
81.2
Very High
Improved
Excellent
Education Quality
92.4
89.3
89.3
89.5
89.2
89.5
Very High
Improved
Excellent
Drop Out Rate
2.0
2.7
2.6
3.4
3.3
3.3
Very High
Maintained
Excellent
High School Completion Rate

(3 yr)
83.2
84.2
81.9
76.4
74.9
74.6
Very High
Maintained
Excellent
PAT: Acceptable
n/a
n/a
n/a
73.0
73.1
73.9
n/a
n/a
n/a
PAT: Excellence
n/a
n/a
n/a
18.8
18.4
18.9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Diploma: Acceptable
87.1
87.3
86.6
85.2
85.5
84.6
High
Maintained
Good
Diploma: Excellence
16.9
17.7
20.0
21.0
21.1
20.0
Intermediate
Maintained
Acceptable
Diploma Exam Participation

Rate (4+ Exams)
69.2
57.4
57.2
54.9
50.5
54.4
Very High
Improved
Significantly
Excellent
Rutherford Scholarship
Eligibility Rate
84.9
81.1
81.4
61.2
60.9
61.3
Very High
Improved
Excellent
Transition Rate (6 yr)
64.4
68.7
70.3
59.8
59.2
59.0
High
Declined
Acceptable
Work Preparation
86.1
89.3
85.9
82.0
81.2
80.4
High
Maintained
Good
Citizenship
85.4
81.3
81.6
83.5
83.4
83.1
Very High
Improved
Excellent
Measure
Prev 3
Current
Year
Result
Average
Measure Evaluation
Parental Involvement
Excellent
84.6
76.8
79.1
80.7
80.6
80.2
Very High
Maintained
Excellent
Continuous Improvement
Excellent
School Improvement
93.5
88.1
84.2
79.6
79.8
80.1
Very High
Improved
Significantly
Excellent
Notes:
1. Aggregated PAT results are based upon a weighted average of percent meeting standards (Acceptable, Excellence). The weights are the number of students enrolled in each course. Courses included: English
Language Arts (Grades 6, 9, 9 KAE), Franais (Grades 6, 9), French Language Arts (Grades 6, 9), Mathematics (6, 9, 9 KAE), Science (Grades 6, 9, 9 KAE), Social Studies (Grades 6, 9, 9 KAE)..
2. Aggregated Diploma results are a weighted average of percent meeting standards (Acceptable, Excellence) on Diploma Examinations. The weights are the number of students writing the Diploma Examination
for each course. Courses included: English Language Arts 30-1, English Language Arts 30-2, French Language Arts 30-1, Franais 30-1, Chemistry 30, Physics 30, Biology 30, Science 30, Social Studies
30-1, Social Studies 30-2. Current and historical Diploma results have been adjusted to reflect change in data source system.
3. The subsequent pages include evaluations for each performance measure. If jurisdictions desire not to present this information for each performance measure in the subsequent pages, please include a
reference to this overall summary page for each performance measure.
4. Data values have been suppressed where the number of students or respondents is less than 6. Suppression is marked with an asterisk (*).
5. Please note that participation in Diploma Examinations and Grade 9 Provincial Achievement Tests was impacted by the flooding in June 2013. Caution should be used when interpreting trends over time for the
province and those school authorities affected by the floods.
6. Survey results for the province and some school authorities were impacted by changes in the number of students responding to the survey through the introduction of the Tell THEM From ME survey tool in
2014.
Measure Evaluation Reference
Page 2
Achievement Evaluation
Achievement evaluation is based upon a comparison of Current Year data to a set of standards which remain consistent over time. The Standards are calculated by taking the 3 year average
of baseline data for each measure across all school jurisdictions and calculating the 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles. Once calculated, these standards remain in place from year to year to
allow for consistent planning and evaluation.
The table below shows the range of values defining the 5 achievement evaluation levels for each measure.
Measure
Very Low
Low
Intermediate
High
Very High
Safe and Caring
0.00 - 77.62
77.62 - 81.05
81.05 - 84.50
84.50 - 88.03
88.03 - 100.00
Program of Studies
0.00 - 66.31
66.31 - 72.65
72.65 - 78.43
78.43 - 81.59
81.59 - 100.00
Education Quality
0.00 - 80.94
80.94 - 84.23
84.23 - 87.23
87.23 - 89.60
89.60 - 100.00
Drop Out Rate
100.00 - 9.40
9.40 - 6.90
6.90 - 4.27
4.27 - 2.79
2.79 - 0.00
High School Completion Rate (3 yr)
0.00 - 57.03
57.03 - 62.36
62.36 - 73.88
73.88 - 81.79
81.79 - 100.00
PAT: Acceptable
0.00 - 65.90
65.90 - 70.33
70.33 - 79.81
79.81 - 84.65
84.65 - 100.00
PAT: Excellence
0.00 - 9.97
9.97 - 13.45
13.45 - 19.56
19.56 - 25.83
25.83 - 100.00
Diploma: Acceptable
0.00 - 73.76
73.76 - 81.00
81.00 - 86.67
86.67 - 90.27
90.27 - 100.00
Diploma: Excellence
0.00 - 7.14
7.14 - 13.16
13.16 - 19.74
19.74 - 24.05
24.05 - 100.00
Diploma Exam Participation Rate (4+ Exams)
0.00 - 31.10
31.10 - 44.11
44.11 - 55.78
55.78 - 65.99
65.99 - 100.00
Rutherford Scholarship Eligibility Rate
0.00 - 43.18
43.18 - 49.83
49.83 - 59.41
59.41 - 70.55
70.55 - 100.00
Transition Rate (6 yr)
0.00 - 39.80
39.80 - 46.94
46.94 - 56.15
56.15 - 68.34
68.34 - 100.00
Work Preparation
0.00 - 66.92
66.92 - 72.78
72.78 - 77.78
77.78 - 86.13
86.13 - 100.00
Citizenship
0.00 - 66.30
66.30 - 71.63
71.63 - 77.50
77.50 - 81.08
81.08 - 100.00
0.00 - 70.76
70.76 - 74.58
74.58 - 78.50
78.50 - 82.30
82.30 - 100.00
School Improvement
0.00 - 65.25
65.25 - 70.85
70.85 - 76.28
76.28 - 80.41
80.41 - 100.00
Notes:
1) For all measures except Drop Out Rate: The range of values at each evaluation level is interpreted as greater than or equal to the lower value, and less than the higher value. For the Very High
evaluation level, values range from greater than or equal to the lower value to 100%.
2) Drop Out Rate measure: As "Drop Out Rate" is inverse to most measures (i.e. lower values are "better"), the range of values at each evaluation level is interpreted as greater than the lower
value and less than or equal to the higher value. For the Very High evaluation level, values range from 0% to less than or equal to the higher value.
Improvement Table
For each jurisdiction, improvement evaluation consists of comparing the Current Year result for each measure with the previous three-year average. A chi-square statistical test is used to
determine the significance of the improvement. This test takes into account the size of the jurisdiction in the calculation to make improvement evaluation fair across jurisdictions of different
sizes.
The table below shows the definition of the 5 improvement evaluation levels based upon the chi-square result.
Evaluation Category
Chi-Square Range
Declined Significantly
3.84 + (current < previous 3-year average)
Declined
1.00 - 3.83 (current < previous 3-year average)
Maintained
less than 1.00
Improved
1.00 - 3.83 (current > previous 3-year average)
Improved Significantly
3.84 + (current > previous 3-year average)
Page 3
Overall Evaluation Table

The overall evaluation combines the Achievement Evaluation and the Improvement Evaluation. The table below illustrates how the Achievement and Improvement evaluations are combined to
get the overall evaluation.
Achievement
Improvement
Very High
High
Intermediate
Low
Very Low
Improved Significantly
Excellent
Good
Good
Good
Acceptable
Improved
Excellent
Good
Good
Acceptable
Issue
Maintained
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Issue
Concern
Good
Acceptable
Issue
Issue
Concern
Acceptable
Issue
Issue
Concern
Concern
Declined
Declined Significantly
Category Evaluation
The category evaluation is an average of the Overall Evaluation of the measures that make up the category. For the purpose of the calculation, consider an Overall Evaluation of Excellent to be
2, Good to be 1, Acceptable to be 0, Issue to be -1, and Concern to be -2. The simple average (mean) of these values rounded to the nearest integer produces the Category Evaluation value.
This is converted back to a colour using the same scale above (e.g. 2=Excellent, 1=Good, 0=Intermediate, -1=Issue, -2=Concern)
Page 4
Page 5
Desired Outcome One: Every student is successful

Specific Outcome:
Students achieve student learning outcomes.
Performance Measure
Results (in percentages)
Target
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall percentage of students who achieved

the acceptable standard on diploma
examinations (overall results).
86.7
82.9
89.7
87.3
Overall percentage of students who achieved

the standard of excellence on diploma
examinations (overall results).
18.0
18.8
23.4
17.7
Performance Measure
Evaluation
Targets
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
87.1
High
Maintained
Good
87.4
87.7
88.0
16.9
Intermediate
Maintained
Acceptable
17.0
17.3
17.5
2015
Target
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
High School Completion Rate - Percentage

of students who completed high school
within three years of entering Grade 10.
80.7
83.1
78.5
84.2
Drop Out Rate - annual dropout rate of

students aged 14 to 18
3.4
3.3
1.9
High school to post-secondary transition

rate of students within six years of entering
Grade 10.
68.4
71.5
Percentage of Grade 12 students eligible

for a Rutherford Scholarship.
71.7
Percentage of students writing four or more

diploma exams within three years of
entering Grade 10.
51.5
2015
2016
Evaluation
2017
2018
Targets
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
2016
2017
2018
83.2
Very High
Maintained
Excellent
83.5
83.7
84.0
2.7
2.0
Very High
Maintained
Excellent
2.0
1.8
1.8
70.6
68.7
64.4
High
Declined
Acceptable
64.8
65.0
65.0
77.7
85.3
81.1
84.9
Very High
Improved
Excellent
85.0
85.0
85.0
56.0
58.2
57.4
69.2
Very High
Improved
Significantly
Excellent
69.5
69.7
70.0
Comment on Results
(an assessment of progress toward achieving the target)
Our focus on Rigor, Relevance and Relationships as defined in our Continuous Improvement Plan encourages all staff and students to direct their efforts
toward good instruction and powerful learning.Our foc
Page 6
Strategies
(1) Continue to monitor at risk students at mid-term and put in place specific interventions.
(2) Continue to use flex time as an opportunity for 1:1 contact with teachers and for mastery learning.
(3) Continue the process of utilizing Room 114 as a study hall, test center and place for students to get extra help during flex and
class time.
Notes:
2. Diploma Examination Participation, High School Completion and High school to Post-secondary Transition rates are based upon a cohort of grade 10 students who are tracked over time.
4. Please note that participation in Diploma Examinations was impacted by the flooding in June 2013. Caution should be used when interpreting trends over time for the province and those school authorities
affected by the floods.
Diploma Examination Results Measure Details

Diploma Exam Course by Course Results by Students Writing.
2011
English Lang Arts 30-1
French Lang Arts 30-1
Franais 30-1
Pure Mathematics 30
Applied Mathematics 30
Mathematics 30-1
2012
Target
2013
2014
2015
2015
School
91.3
10.9
87.6
9.5
89.5
11.5
91.0
9.6
88.6
7.1
Authority
89.3
9.8
88.1
10.4
88.8
11.2
91.2
10.4
88.0
7.4
Province
85.0
10.1
86.3
11.3
86.0
10.4
87.6
11.8
86.5
11.5
12.1
School
93.8
8.8
72.9
8.5
92.3
9.6
87.5
12.5
97.0
Authority
90.5
9.5
79.6
7.5
86.1
7.6
86.8
10.5
97.6
9.4
Province
88.7
9.1
89.6
10.7
89.4
10.9
89.8
13.1
88.7
11.3
*
School
100.0
25.0
85.7
0.0
100.0
7.7
Authority
100.0
25.0
85.7
0.0
100.0
7.7
Province
95.3
14.5
95.6
13.5
95.4
12.4
96.6
14.6
95.5
9.9
n/a
School
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Authority
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Province
93.8
19.9
96.5
18.9
96.8
18.2
99.3
29.2
95.3
17.1
School
84.1
26.9
83.8
26.5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Authority
82.5
25.3
84.8
25.0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Province
81.3
29.2
82.0
27.5
59.0
11.4
n/a
n/a
School
72.4
5.3
81.5
9.3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Authority
71.4
4.8
74.6
7.5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Province
74.5
9.8
75.8
10.3
71.4
17.9
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
School
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
86.9
33.8
68.4
22.4
77.5
29.4
Authority
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
87.3
32.4
65.2
20.0
78.8
28.8
Page 7
Mathematics 30-2
Social Studies 30-1
Social Studies 30-2
Biology 30
Chemistry 30
Physics 30
Science 30
Province
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
80.9
35.9
75.1
27.9
76.2
School
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
61.2
6.1
63.3
5.0
67.2
31.7
7.8
Authority
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
63.8
5.2
60.7
6.0
67.1
11.0
Province
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
69.5
9.6
71.3
15.0
73.9
15.5
School
84.3
14.5
84.9
12.3
95.8
28.2
91.1
19.6
91.5
12.3
Authority
83.8
13.4
84.5
12.5
93.8
26.9
88.8
17.9
92.2
14.7
Province
83.0
14.9
86.3
16.7
85.4
15.2
85.6
14.3
87.1
16.2
School
88.0
18.8
84.5
9.5
85.1
14.9
94.9
16.7
89.3
8.3
Authority
87.7
18.1
85.4
8.7
85.6
12.4
92.2
12.5
91.5
7.7
Province
85.6
15.9
83.0
13.7
82.2
13.7
84.0
14.8
81.3
12.5
School
85.3
27.6
80.1
33.3
92.9
28.3
83.9
19.5
83.2
25.6
Authority
86.5
29.2
81.3
31.3
90.1
27.0
84.7
20.9
84.4
25.4
Province
82.0
30.0
81.9
28.2
84.4
32.2
85.2
31.9
85.9
33.0
School
75.5
25.5
77.8
23.2
81.0
38.1
81.0
26.6
80.6
34.7
Authority
75.4
25.4
75.9
24.1
80.8
37.5
84.7
29.6
79.8
34.2
Province
75.4
28.0
77.1
28.7
78.8
31.8
81.5
35.2
82.2
34.2
School
87.3
20.6
85.5
38.7
86.4
37.9
75.7
18.6
77.3
20.5
Authority
84.5
19.7
85.9
35.2
87.5
37.5
75.3
18.2
79.6
24.1
Province
77.0
27.8
81.1
30.5
81.5
30.5
83.2
34.3
83.9
35.8
School
91.7
16.7
93.3
13.3
n/a
n/a
100.0
36.4
84.6
7.7
Authority
91.7
16.7
93.3
13.3
n/a
n/a
92.9
28.6
80.0
6.7
Province
80.4
21.0
79.8
22.0
84.1
25.8
85.0
25.4
83.9
26.7
Note: Data values have been suppressed where the number of students or respondents is less than 6. Suppression is marked with an asterisk (*).
A = Acceptable; E = Excellence the percentages achieving the acceptable standard include the percentages achieving the standard of excellence.
Current and historical Diploma results have been adjusted to reflect change in data source system.
Please note that participation in Diploma Examinations was impacted by the flooding in June 2013. Caution should be used when interpreting trends over time for the province and those school
authorities affected by the floods.
Page 8
Specific Outcome:
Students achieve student learning outcomes.
Performance Measure
Target
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Percentage of teachers, parents and students

who are satisfied that students model the
characteristics of active citizenship.
80.6
80.2
83.4
81.3
Percentage of teachers and parents who agree

that students are taught attitudes and
behaviours that will make them successful at
work when they finish school.
81.5
86.1
82.4
89.3
2015
Evaluation
Targets
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
2016
2017
2018
85.4
Very High
Improved
Excellent
85.5
85.7
86.0
86.1
High
Maintained
Good
86.4
86.5
86.7
Comment on Results
We need to continue our focus and development of programs that prepare students for life after high school and also encourage students to become active and involved members of the larger
community during their time in school. Communicating these initiatives to parents and staff is also important to achieving our goals in this area.
Strategies
(1) Continue to develop the Faith in Action programs in Religious Education.

(2) Assist students in developing clubs focused on citizenship such as Interact and Santas Anonymous.
(3) Recognize students for their accomplishments outside the school through the use of our What YOU do is Good display board.
Survey results for the province and some school authorities were impacted by changes in the number of students responding to the survey through the introduction of the Tell THEM From ME survey tool in 2014.
Page 9
Desired Outcome Two: Alberta has quality teaching and school leadership
Specific Outcome:
Teacher preparation and professional growth focus on the competencies needed to help students learn.
Effective learning and teaching is achieved through collaborative leadership.
Performance Measure
satisfied with the opportunity for students to
receive a broad program of studies including
fine arts, career, technology, and health and
physical education.
Target
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
83.3
81.1
82.1
86.2
85.9
2015
Evaluation
Targets
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
Very High
Improved
Excellent
2016
86.1
2017
86.3
2018
86.5
Comment on Results
Our Wellness program has added another dimension to the programs here at CCH. We continue to examine ways to maintain a variety of programs when faced with funding short-falls,
particularly in the areas of Inclusive Education. It is difficult to maintain programs for disadvantaged students as these necessarily require smaller class sizes, which puts an additional burden on
an already taxed system.
Strategies
(1) Continue to seek out creative ways to offer a variety of programs in fine-arts, athletics and core subjects - possibly through increased use of blended learning and
cross-curricular projects.
(2) Maintain and develop our Science and Inquiry program to ensure it continues to stand as one of our most rigorous and relevant programs.
(3) Develop our new Honors program for all core classes.
Survey results for the province and some school authorities were impacted by changes in the number of students responding to the survey through the introduction of the Tell THEM From ME survey tool in 2014.
Safe and Caring Measure Details

Percentage of teacher, parent and student agreement that: students are safe at school, are learning the importance of caring for others, are learning respect for others and are
Page 10
treated fairly in school.

School
Authority
Province
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
87.7
87.2
89.6
87.8
93.4
88.4
88.8
90.1
90.1
90.0
88.1
88.6
89.0
89.1
89.2
Teacher
97.1
97.4
97.8
94.5
100.0
96.8
97.5
96.9
96.3
97.9
94.5
94.8
95.0
95.3
95.4
Parent
83.0
85.3
87.0
84.4
92.4
84.4
86.7
88.6
91.3
88.4
86.6
87.4
87.8
88.9
89.3
Student
82.9
78.9
84.1
84.5
87.8
84.0
82.2
84.8
82.7
83.6
83.3
83.7
84.2
83.1
83.0
Program of Studies Measure Details

Percentage of teachers, parents and students satisfied with the opportunity for students to receive a broad program of studies including fine arts, career, technology, and health and
physical education.
School
Authority
Province
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
83.3
81.1
82.1
86.2
85.9
84.6
82.1
84.8
84.8
84.0
80.9
80.7
81.5
81.3
81.3
Teacher
94.8
92.9
95.1
92.8
97.6
92.1
91.3
94.3
89.0
91.5
87.6
87.3
87.9
87.5
87.2
Parent
73.6
69.6
69.5
82.4
74.4
77.7
76.2
77.9
83.6
80.0
78.3
78.1
78.9
79.9
79.9
Student
81.6
80.8
81.6
83.4
85.7
84.1
78.7
82.2
81.7
80.4
76.9
76.9
77.8
76.6
76.9
Page 11
Graph of Overall School Results
Graph of Detailed School Results
100
100
80
80
60
60
Result (%)
Result (%)
40
40
20
20
0
2011
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
2012
2013
2014
Overall
Parent
Student
Teacher
2015
Survey results for the province and some school authorities
100
100
80
80
60
60
Result (%)
Result (%)
40
40
20
20
0
2011
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
2012
2013
2014
Overall
Parent
Student
Teacher
2015
Survey results for the province and some school authorities were impacted by changes
Page 12
Desired Outcome Three: Albertas education system is governed effectively

Specific Outcome:
The education system demonstrates collaboration and engagement.
Performance Measure
Target
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Percentage of teachers and parents satisfied

with parental involvement in decisions about
their child's education.
77.2
80.2
80.1
76.8

satisfied with the overall quality of basic
education.
87.7
87.3
91.4
89.3
2015
Evaluation
Targets
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
2016
2017
2018
84.6
Very High
Maintained
Excellent
84.7
84.9
85.0
92.4
Very High
Improved
Excellent
92.4
92.5
92.7
Comment on Results
Communication and opportunities for dialogue are essential to ensuring that stakeholders feel involved in the process of education. We place a high priority on surveying students and teachers
and applying what we learn to improvement in our school. It would be good if we could increase attendance at our Parent council meetings, although we acknowledge that lack of participation is
often a sign that parents feel things are functioning well.
Strategies
(1) Use parent-teacher interview nights as a means to communicate with parents through displays and presentations.
(2) Continue to communicate our initiatives and results in order to ensure that everyone is aware of the good things happening in our school.
(3) continue our use of social media to communicate with our community.
Survey results for the province and some school authorities were impacted by changes in the number of students responding to the survey through the introduction of the Tell THEM From ME survey tool
in 2014.
Parental Involvement Measure Details

Percentage of teachers and parents satisfied with parental involvement in decisions about their child's education.
Page 13
School
Authority
Province
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
77.2
80.2
80.1
76.8
84.6
79.9
82.3
82.1
83.2
85.3
79.9
79.7
80.3
80.6
80.7
Teacher
88.6
90.7
91.1
86.0
94.0
90.8
93.9
90.8
90.5
94.7
88.1
88.0
88.5
88.0
88.1
Parent
65.8
69.7
69.1
67.7
75.2
68.9
70.6
73.4
75.9
76.0
71.7
71.4
72.2
73.1
73.4
Result (%)
100
100
80
80
60
60
Result (%)
40
20
0
2011
40
20
2012
2013
Overall
2014
2015
0
2011
Overall
2012
2013
Parent
2014
2015
Teacher
Survey results for the province and some school authorities were impacted by changes in the number
Page 14
Specific Outcome:
Students and communities have access to safe and healthy learning environments.
Performance Measure
Target
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Percentage of teacher, parent and student

agreement that: students are safe at school,
are learning the importance of caring for
others, are learning respect for others and are
treated fairly in school.
87.7
87.2
89.6
87.8

indicating that their school and schools in their
jurisdiction have improved or stayed the same
the last three years.
80.4
80.7
83.8
88.1
2015
Evaluation
Targets
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
2016
2017
2018
93.4
Very High
Improved
Significantly
Excellent
93.5
93.7
94.0
93.5
Very High
Improved
Significantly
Excellent
93.7
94.0
94.0
Comment on Results
Our wellness project has aided in creating an atmosphere that supports all learners in a safe and caring environment. Relationships is the third r in our slogan, and teachers have focused their
efforts on ensuring that students feel supported and cared for. In addition, the quarter system allows us opportunities to work closely with students for prolonged time periods, thus enabling these
results.
Strategies
(1) further develop our wellness program; expand offerings and make the wellness centre more visible and useful for students.
(2) Continue the process of surveying students at our round tables to give them a voice in the school devisions.
(3) Ensure that all staff are trained in methods to support at-risk students.
in 2014.
Page 15
Desired Outcome Four: First Nations, Mtis and Inuit students are successful
Specific Outcome:
The achievement gap between First Nations, Mtis and Inuit (FNMI) students and all other students is
eliminated.
(Results and evaluations for FNMI measures are required for Public/Separate/Francophone School Authorities only)
Performance Measure
Target
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall percentage of self-identified FNMI

students who achieved the acceptable
standard on diploma examinations (overall
results).
70.8
69.0
73.9
85.4
Overall percentage of self-identified FNMI

students who achieved the standard of
excellence on diploma examinations (overall
results).
12.5
7.1
6.5
17.1
Performance Measure
Evaluation
Targets
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
83.6
Intermediate
Maintained
Acceptable
83.8
84.0
84.3
12.3
Low
Maintained
Issue
12.5
12.8
13.0
2015
Target
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
High School Completion Rate - Percentage

of self-identified FNMI students who
completed high school within three years of
entering Grade 10.
40.1
46.0
41.0
45.0
Drop Out Rate - annual dropout rate of selfidentified FNMI students aged 14 to 18
10.2
6.6
6.1
High school to post-secondary transition rate

of self-identified FNMI students within six
years of entering Grade 10.
62.9
53.3
Percentage of Grade 12 self-identified FNMI

students eligible for a Rutherford
Scholarship.
28.6
Percentage of self-identified FNMI students

writing four or more diploma exams within
three years of entering Grade 10.
20.1
2015
2016
Evaluation
2017
2018
Targets
Achievement
Improvement
Overall
2016
2017
2018
43.0
Very Low
Maintained
Concern
43.5
43.5
43.6
13.4
14.5
Very Low
Declined
Concern
14.0
13.8
13.5
64.3
53.8
34.4
Very Low
Declined
Concern
34.5
34.8
35.0
52.9
69.2
27.3
55.6
Intermediate
Maintained
Acceptable
55.6
55.8
56.0
9.2
14.9
16.3
30.1
Very Low
Improved
Issue
30.5
30.6
30.8
Comment on Results
There are so many variables that impact these results. First of all, the high school completion rate in three years is difficult to improve, when first we must focus on the many variables that impact
attendance of FNMI students. Instead, we focus on achievement as evidenced by the improvement in our Rutherford eligibility rates and in the percentage writing four or more exams. The
Page 16
presence of more and more FNMI students in academic streams is a slow process, but one that ensures that upcoming students have more FNMI role models for them as they pursue their
education.
Strategies
(1) Continue to maintain and develop the Grad Coach program as a means to provide supports and encouragement for FNMI youth.
(2) continue our focus on engaging and hands-ons strategies especially in the Science classes, as this approach is particularly effective with FNMI students.
(3) Continue and further develop our recognition of cultural attributes in our students so that they develop a strong sense of self-esteem and a desire to share their
talents with our whole school community.
Notes:
1. Aggregated PAT results are based upon a weighted average of percent meeting standards (Acceptable, Excellence). The weights are the number of students enrolled in each course. Courses included: English
Language Arts (Grades 6, 9, 9 KAE), Franais (Grades 6, 9), French Language Arts (Grades 6, 9), Mathematics (6, 9, 9 KAE), Science (Grades 6, 9, 9 KAE), Social Studies (Grades 6, 9, 9 KAE).
3. Diploma Examination Participation, High School Completion and High school to Post-secondary Transition rates are based upon a cohort of grade 10 students who are tracked over time.
Graph of Diploma Examination Results Overall

100
80
60
Results(%)
40
20
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Acceptable Standard %
Standard of Excellence %
Note: Current and historical Diploma results have been adjusted to reflect change in data source system.
Page 17
Diploma Examination Results by Course

Results(%)
100
100
80
80
60
60
Results(%)
40
20
20
0
2011
40
0
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
French Lang Arts 30-1
2014
2015
[No Data for Franais 30]
100
80
60
Results(%)
40
20
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Page 18
M athe m atics 30-1
[No Data for Pure Mathematics 30]

100
80
60
Results(%)
40
20
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Page 19

M athe m atics 30-2
[No Data for Applied Mathematics 30]

100
80
60
Results(%)
40
20
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2014
2015
Social Studie s 30-1
Social Studie s 30-2
100
100
80
80
60
Results(%)
60
Results(%)
40
20
20
0
2011
40
0
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
Page 20
Biology 30
Che m istry 30
100
100
80
80
60
Results(%)
60
Results(%)
40
20
20
0
2011
40
0
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Page 21

Physics 30
Results(%)
Science 30
100
100
80
80
60
60
Results(%)
40
20
20
0
2011
40
0
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Page 22
High School Completion Rate Measure Details

High School Completion Rate - percentages of students who completed high school within three, four and five years of entering Grade 10.
School
Authority
Province
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
3 Year Completion
80.7
83.1
78.5
84.2
83.2
81.6
82.0
79.0
80.9
81.0
72.6
74.1
74.8
74.9
76.4
4 Year Completion
82.6
84.7
84.4
83.0
88.8
81.3
84.8
83.8
82.6
86.1
76.9
78.1
79.4
79.6
80.0
5 Year Completion
83.3
83.8
87.5
85.2
84.6
82.8
83.0
87.7
84.7
84.0
79.0
79.6
80.8
81.7
82.1
Graph of School Results
Results(%)
100
100
80
80
60
60
Results(%)
40
20
20
0
2010
40
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
3 Year Completion
2011
2012
2013
2014
4 Year Completion

100
80
60
Results(%)
40
20
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
5 Year Completion
Page 23
Page 24
Drop Out Rate Measure Details

Drop Out Rate - annual dropout rate of students aged 14 to 18
School
Authority
Province
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
Drop Out Rate
3.4
3.3
1.9
2.7
2.0
2.7
2.6
2.4
3.6
2.4
4.2
3.2
3.5
3.3
3.4
Returning Rate
24.1
20.9
17.6
18.6
5.5
28.7
20.6
17.3
27.7
21.7
27.9
23.4
23.0
21.1
20.3
Results(%)
100
100
80
80
60
60
Results(%)
40
20
40
20
0
2010
2014
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
Drop Out Rate
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Returning Rate
Page 25
High School to Post-secondary Transition Rate Measure Details

High school to post-secondary transition rate of students within four and six years of entering Grade 10.
School
Authority
Province
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
4 Year Rate
50.8
47.3
46.5
44.7
62.4
48.0
46.0
44.9
45.2
59.5
37.8
38.2
39.6
40.0
38.4
6 Year Rate
68.4
71.5
70.6
68.7
64.4
69.9
68.7
67.0
67.4
62.9
59.3
58.4
59.5
59.2
59.8
Results(%)
100
100
80
80
60
60
Results(%)
40
20
20
0
2010
40
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
4 Year (%)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
6 Year (%)
Page 26
Rutherford Eligibility Rate Measure Details

Percentage of Grade 12 students eligible for a Rutherford Scholarship.
School
Rutherford Scholarship Eligibility Rate
Authority
Province
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
71.7
77.7
85.3
81.1
84.9
70.7
74.0
75.4
74.6
76.2
59.6
61.5
61.3
60.9
61.2
Rutherford eligibility rate details.

Grade 10 Rutherford
Grade 11 Rutherford
Grade 12 Rutherford
Overall
Reporting
School Year
Total
Students
2010
269
178
66.2
162
60.2
95
35.3
193
71.7
2011
309
228
73.8
194
62.8
125
40.5
240
77.7
2012
231
187
81.0
153
66.2
92
39.8
197
85.3
2013
244
189
77.5
173
70.9
117
48.0
198
81.1
2014
199
165
82.9
140
70.4
81
40.7
169
84.9
Number of
Percent of
Number of
Percent of
Number of
Percent of
Number of
Percent of
Students Eligible Students Eligible Students Eligible Students Eligible Students Eligible Students Eligible Students Eligible Students Eligible

100
80
60
Results(%)
40
20
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
% Eligible f or Scholarship
Page 27
Diploma Examination Participation Rate Measure Details

Diploma examination participation rate: Percentage of students writing 0 to 6 or more Diploma Examinations by the end of their 3rd year of high school.
School
Authority
Province
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
% Writing 0 Exams
9.4
12.7
10.8
8.7
8.9
10.2
13.3
10.9
11.2
11.0
17.2
16.1
15.9
16.1
15.2
% Writing 1+ Exams
90.6
87.3
89.2
91.3
91.1
89.8
86.7
89.1
88.8
89.0
82.8
83.9
84.1
83.9
84.8
% Writing 2+ Exams
86.0
84.8
86.5
88.0
89.3
85.6
84.0
86.2
85.7
86.8
79.6
80.8
81.2
80.8
82.0
% Writing 3+ Exams
68.4
71.8
68.9
71.0
75.7
68.4
69.6
67.9
66.9
70.8
66.0
67.4
67.5
63.8
65.6
% Writing 4+ Exams
51.5
56.0
58.2
57.4
69.2
52.9
54.7
57.1
53.9
63.1
54.9
56.2
56.6
50.5
54.9
% Writing 5+ Exams
25.7
30.1
35.6
38.8
45.3
26.8
31.6
35.2
36.1
40.9
36.1
37.2
38.0
31.8
36.7
% Writing 6+ Exams
6.9
11.6
14.9
18.2
20.1
7.6
13.0
15.7
17.2
18.2
13.4
14.1
14.6
11.5
13.3

100
80
60
Results(%)
40
20
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
% Writing 4+ Exams
Page 28
Percentage of students writing 1 or more Diploma Examinations by the end of their 3rd year of high school, by course and subject.
School
Authority
Province
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
English Language Arts 30-1
64.4
60.5
63.3
66.7
72.7
63.0
60.0
61.0
63.1
64.4
54.5
54.9
55.1
54.4
54.4
English Language Arts 30-2
22.0
22.5
22.5
22.0
18.5
22.4
22.7
24.4
22.7
23.4
25.1
26.1
26.1
27.2
28.2
Total of 1 or more English Diploma Exams
85.2
81.7
85.0
86.4
89.4
84.4
81.6
84.8
83.9
86.3
78.0
79.0
79.2
79.3
80.3
Social Studies 30
6.4
0.6
0.0
n/a
n/a
5.8
0.5
0.0
n/a
n/a
3.7
0.3
0.0
n/a
n/a
Social Studies 30-1
37.1
49.5
53.9
56.1
50.5
39.0
47.7
52.7
52.4
45.3
45.7
48.2
48.0
46.1
45.5
Social Studies 33
5.3
0.0
0.0
n/a
n/a
4.5
0.0
0.0
n/a
n/a
2.5
0.1
0.0
n/a
n/a
Social Studies 30-2
36.7
32.5
33.7
30.7
38.4
35.4
33.7
33.7
31.5
41.0
27.4
31.0
32.1
34.0
35.6
Total of 1 or more Social Diploma Exams
85.2
81.7
85.8
86.7
88.4
84.4
81.1
84.8
83.9
86.0
78.1
78.9
79.3
79.3
80.3
Pure Mathematics 30
40.9
42.4
40.4
6.1
0.0
38.6
41.6
39.7
5.0
0.0
41.4
42.6
42.5
7.3
0.1
Applied Mathematics 30
24.2
23.2
21.7
0.0
0.0
26.3
21.9
21.9
0.0
0.0
19.7
20.0
19.6
0.2
0.0
Mathematics 30-1
n/a
n/a
n/a
42.4
48.6
n/a
n/a
n/a
38.8
43.2
n/a
n/a
n/a
30.0
37.6
Mathematics 30-2
n/a
n/a
n/a
15.5
25.5
n/a
n/a
n/a
15.5
25.5
n/a
n/a
n/a
16.9
21.6
Total of 1 or more Math Diploma Exams
65.2
65.6
62.2
63.6
72.2
64.9
63.6
61.3
59.0
66.9
60.6
62.0
61.5
52.5
57.4
Biology 30
38.3
46.0
53.2
51.9
61.1
39.9
45.8
52.1
49.8
56.8
41.2
42.8
43.1
42.5
41.7
Chemistry 30
23.9
31.5
34.1
38.3
40.3
25.6
32.6
34.0
35.6
36.7
35.2
36.0
36.7
31.7
35.0
Physics 30
19.3
19.6
19.5
25.8
28.7
19.5
20.5
19.7
23.3
25.5
20.0
20.6
20.4
17.4
20.2
Science 30
5.3
3.2
4.5
0.8
6.0
4.5
2.7
3.8
0.6
4.7
9.0
9.1
10.5
9.8
13.0
Total of 1 or more Science Diploma Exams
55.3
60.5
62.2
61.7
70.8
56.2
58.6
60.0
58.4
64.4
57.6
59.1
59.5
57.7
59.8
Franais 30-1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
French Language Arts 30
2.3
2.9
2.6
5.3
1.9
1.9
2.5
2.2
4.4
1.4
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
Total of 1 or more French Diploma Exams
2.3
2.9
2.6
5.3
1.9
1.9
2.5
2.2
4.4
1.4
3.1
3.1
2.9
3.0
3.0
Page 29
Citizenship Measure Details

Percentage of teachers, parents and students who are satisfied that students model the characteristics of active citizenship.
School
Authority
Province
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
80.6
80.2
83.4
81.3
85.4
83.2
82.7
85.1
85.4
85.3
81.9
82.5
83.4
83.4
83.5
Teacher
98.0
96.9
96.7
96.2
100.0
96.6
96.8
97.4
96.8
98.4
92.7
93.1
93.6
93.8
94.2
Parent
75.1
76.4
75.1
73.6
77.9
76.0
78.2
79.1
85.5
83.2
78.6
79.4
80.3
81.9
82.1
Student
68.8
67.2
78.4
74.1
78.4
77.0
73.1
78.6
73.9
74.2
74.5
75.0
76.2
74.5
74.2
100
100
80
80
60
60
Result (%)
Result (%)
40
40
20
20
0
2011
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
2012
2013
2014
Overall
Parent
Student
Teacher
2015
in 2014.
Work Preparation Measure Details

Percentage of teachers and parents who agree that students are taught attitudes and behaviours that will make them successful at work when they finish school.
School
Authority
Province
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
81.5
86.1
82.4
89.3
86.1
81.9
81.4
80.5
84.5
82.1
80.1
79.7
80.3
81.2
82.0
Teacher
92.7
97.4
94.3
97.9
97.2
93.9
93.0
94.4
92.8
92.0
89.6
89.5
89.4
89.3
89.7
Parent
70.3
74.8
70.5
80.8
75.0
69.8
69.9
66.7
76.2
72.1
70.6
69.9
71.1
73.1
74.2
Page 30
Result (%)
100
100
80
80
60
60
Result (%)
40
20
0
2011
40
20
2012
2013
Overall
2014
2015
0
2011
Overall
2012
2013
Parent
2014
2015
Teacher
Page 31
Program of Studies Measure Details

Percentage of teachers, parents and students satisfied with the opportunity for students to receive a broad program of studies including fine arts, career, technology, and health and
physical education.
School
Authority
Province
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
83.3
81.1
82.1
86.2
85.9
84.6
82.1
84.8
84.8
84.0
80.9
80.7
81.5
81.3
81.3
Teacher
94.8
92.9
95.1
92.8
97.6
92.1
91.3
94.3
89.0
91.5
87.6
87.3
87.9
87.5
87.2
Parent
73.6
69.6
69.5
82.4
74.4
77.7
76.2
77.9
83.6
80.0
78.3
78.1
78.9
79.9
79.9
Student
81.6
80.8
81.6
83.4
85.7
84.1
78.7
82.2
81.7
80.4
76.9
76.9
77.8
76.6
76.9
100
100
80
80
60
60
Result (%)
Result (%)
40
40
20
20
0
2011
0
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
2012
2013
2014
Overall
Parent
Student
Teacher
2015
Education Quality Measure Details

Percentage of teachers, parents and students satisfied with the overall quality of basic education.
School
Authority
Province
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
87.7
87.3
91.4
89.3
92.4
89.4
89.0
91.7
91.0
90.7
89.4
89.4
89.8
89.2
89.5
Teacher
98.0
97.4
99.1
94.6
99.1
97.1
97.3
97.9
95.7
98.0
95.5
95.4
95.7
95.5
95.9
Parent
80.8
81.6
88.7
88.5
90.2
82.3
82.9
87.8
89.7
85.4
84.2
84.2
84.9
84.7
85.4
Student
84.3
83.0
86.6
84.7
87.8
88.7
86.9
89.3
87.4
88.7
88.5
88.6
88.7
87.3
87.4
Page 32
100
100
80
80
60
60
Result (%)
Result (%)
40
40
20
20
0
2011
0
2011
2012
2013
Overall
2014
2015
2012
2013
2014
Overall
Parent
Student
Teacher
2015
in 2014.
in 2014.
Page 33
School Improvement Measure Details

Percentage of teachers, parents and students indicating that their school and schools in their jurisdiction have improved or stayed the same the last three years.
School
Authority
Province
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Overall
80.4
80.7
83.8
88.1
93.5
83.0
82.3
84.8
84.4
84.1
80.1
80.0
80.6
79.8
79.6
Teacher
84.6
86.1
85.7
95.5
100.0
88.4
87.7
87.8
88.3
86.6
80.1
81.1
80.9
81.3
79.8
Parent
75.9
75.5
78.7
84.6
92.9
76.6
76.8
80.2
82.5
81.7
77.3
76.2
77.9
77.0
78.5
Student
80.8
80.5
87.0
84.3
87.8
84.0
82.4
86.4
82.2
84.0
82.9
82.7
82.9
81.2
80.7
100
100
80
80
60
60
Result (%)
Result (%)
40
40
20
20
0
2011
0
2011
2012
2013
Overall
2014
2015
2012
2013
2014
Overall
Parent
Student
Teacher
2015
in 2014.
Page 34

Apori 201510 S 6476 Combined 3 Year Education Plan and Aerr

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Apori 201510 S 6476 Combined 3 Year Education Plan and Aerr

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Combined 3 Year Education Plan

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Combined 2015 Accountability Pillar Overall Summary

Safe and Caring Schools

Preparation for Lifelong

Catholic Central High

Safe and Caring

Drop Out Rate

High School Completion Rate

Diploma Exam Participation

Transition Rate (6 yr)

Measure Evaluation Reference

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Safe and Caring

Drop Out Rate

High School Completion Rate (3 yr)

Diploma Exam Participation Rate (4+ Exams)

Rutherford Scholarship Eligibility Rate

Transition Rate (6 yr)

3.84 + (current < previous 3-year average)

1.00 - 3.83 (current < previous 3-year average)

less than 1.00

1.00 - 3.83 (current > previous 3-year average)

3.84 + (current > previous 3-year average)

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Overall Evaluation Table

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Desired Outcome One: Every student is successful

Students achieve student learning outcomes.

Results (in percentages)

Overall percentage of students who achieved

Overall percentage of students who achieved

Results (in percentages)

High School Completion Rate - Percentage

Drop Out Rate - annual dropout rate of

High school to post-secondary transition

Percentage of Grade 12 students eligible

Percentage of students writing four or more

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Diploma Examination Results Measure Details

English Lang Arts 30-1

English Lang Arts 30-2

French Lang Arts 30-1

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Social Studies 30-1

Social Studies 30-2

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Students achieve student learning outcomes.

Results (in percentages)

Percentage of teachers, parents and students

Percentage of teachers and parents who agree

(1) Continue to develop the Faith in Action programs in Religious Education.

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Results (in percentages)

Safe and Caring Measure Details

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

treated fairly in school.

Program of Studies Measure Details

School: 6476 Catholic Central High School

Graph of Overall School Results