(oil 201339 CAUSE No. DC-1sa8119 ‘THE PAN EXPO, LLC, § NTHEDIsTRICTCOURT : Pini : : . } —}9sUDICIAL bisrRieT : NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE. ct, § ‘ Defeats § OF DALLAS COUNTY. TEXAS ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ ‘SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ‘On June 20 and 24, 2016, came to be heard Defendants National Football League (NFL), NFL Network Services, Ine. NFL Network”), NFL. Enereses, LLC (NEL Enterprises"), NFL.com, and NFL. Digital Media's (eollectvely. “Defendants") Second Motion for Summary Judgment, fled May 23, 2016, on all of Plintfl The Fan Expo. LLC's (CPiainit) remaining clams (the “Motin”), Having considered Defendants’ Motion Plaini’s Response, Defendans’ Reply, the evidence submited by the paris to which no bjetion was susttne, the pleadings, andthe angment of eounse, the Court ues as flows: Basiness Disparagement Ch wasps trac age ins Defendants’ Motions GRANTED DENIED by 4h Am, Pet 8 66.68 wi ean mls rad claims, Defendants’ Metion is = Granten DENIED tract Claims (4h Am, Pet. $788 bs Contract and Antilpatory Breach of C |. With respect to Pits breach oF contact and anticipatory breach of conrast lis against Defendants based on the Talent Appearance Agreement signed by Michael! ‘SECOND MOTION FOR SUYIMARY JUDGMENT awe‘cn 2015 ("Fabio Agreement”), Defendents' tion it GRANTED benep 2. With respect to Plinif's breach of contact and anticipatory breach of contact, claims agsine Defends ned on the Takrt Appeamnce Agreement signed by Desmond Pmell on May 6, 2015 *Parel Agremen), Defenians’ Motion i ‘GRANTED benten With respect to Plimif's reach of contend atcpaory breach of const luis oguinst Defendents based onthe alleged agrsmentbetnsen Plaintiff end Defiant relat to NPL Fart Lie, Deendanis? Motion —exaneaw DEN Promssory Estoppel Clsims (Ato Am, Pet. W449 1. Wi respect o Phintfspromissary estoppel elms aganst Defendans hs havo Aggzeren,Defeadnis Metin is wo GRANTED __penten 2 With respect to Phaimil'spramissary estoppel claims against Defendants based ‘on the Parnell Agrggpent, Detennts” Maio is “GRANTED DENIED 3. With spect to Plan's promlsory estoppel clans agaist Defendants bases fon the alleged sgrmant bosncen Plan? and Defendants related to NFL Fantasy Live Dele so ® GRANTED DENIEDava tn Now clans 2.1 With repost ts Pints ro-ty-nontiscowrs sais, Defendants’ Motions —~ GRANTED DENIED ‘Negligence Chums 6th Am, Pet. $9 7274) \Wwithrespast so Pais nal gance claims, Defends Metin it ZT eranren _ even ‘Nelle! Misteoresntaton Claims (hy Am, Pe. 875-7 Wik espet wo Phin Ms velzent mnepeseniion claims, Defensa” Mai “GranteD ___ besten vith abi {ith Am. Pet 4182 1 With respoct te Plimi#s claim for tonious imerirence with the Fablane Agrenent, Defeats’ Motion i (Lecemvten ___ besten 2 Wi cet to P's chin fr tonnes ners ith the Pal Aas sot cxanteo perme For al those claims for which this Court as GRANTED the Motion, those clin a hereby smi wih prejudice ne ‘Euaigesn coma th yeu Sena al Foe Loge ane fut te Cert has acadydsmined Gus it wih prc id. For the avoidance uf dou he Cus ars inet wth papestive ‘elains clans related he NL's leged interfere wh Pa upesive cmc ib Mi ar se fr Fae Senet ate it wl od S£coxp MOTION FOR StmMany suncaeNTSO ORDERED this day of June, 2086 WN. Cait Presiding SECOND MGTION Fox SUR UBEMENE FRO