Professor Anna Mani ,

pioneering woman in Indian science, passed away on August 16. Highly regarded in
scientific circles and admired as a woman of great character, she was one of
India's early feminists. She transcended the delimited cultural and physical
spaces available to her.

IT WAS Autumn, 1992 . I had barely introduced my project on writing a history of

women scientists in India to Professor Anna Mani, when one of her colleagues at
the Raman Research Institute, Bangalore, came over to us. Mani, with a quizzical
smile, turned to her colleague and introduced me: ``Meet Dr. Sur. She is from
America and thinks I am history.'' I mumbled incoherent protests but to no avail.
She continued questioning my gendered motivations, thoroughly amused by my obvious
discomfiture. ``Why do you want to interview me? My being a woman had absolutely
no bearing on what I chose to do with my life. What is this hoopla about women and
science? It must be getting difficult for women to do science these days. We had
no such problems in our time.''

Anna Mani came from a large family (she is the seventh of eight children, three
girls and five boys) in the former state of Travancore, (now part of Kerala) in
the southern part of India. Her father was a prosperous civil engineer who owned
cardamom estates. Although Mani's family belonged to an ancient Syrian Christian
church, her father was an agnostic. By the time she was eight, Mani had read
almost all the books in Malayalam at her public library. On her eighth birthday,
when she was gifted with diamond earrings, as was the custom in her family, she
opted instead for a set of the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

As a child, Mani was drawn to Gandhian politics. Gandhi had visited Mani's
hometown when she was a little girl. He spoke of self-reliance and promoted a
large-scale boycott of foreign goods, especially of cloth from British mills. Mani
recalled, with a touch of pride, how she took to wearing only khadi after that.
Averse to wearing any jewellery, she mused, ``in the olden days they would compile
all the family assets on papyrus. If a woman's worth had to be measured by her
jewellery and assets, wouldn't it be easier for the woman to wear a list of these
assets around her neck?'' Anna Mani could not be bothered about marriage either.
She said she could ``handle only one Syrian Christian at a time'' as, in her own
words, they were always ``hatching, matching, and dispatching.''

In the matter of education, Mani followed her brothers, who were groomed for high-
level careers in government service. While there was no opposition to her desire
for higher education in physics from her family, there was little encouragement.
In 1940, a year after finishing college, Anna Mani obtained a scholarship to do
research in physics at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. She was
accepted in Raman's laboratory as a graduate student. Mani worked on the
spectroscopy of diamonds and rubies. She recorded and analysed fluorescence,
absorption and Raman spectra of 32 diamonds. She studied temperature dependence
and polarisation effects in these spectra. The experiments were long and
painstaking: the crystals were held at liquid air temperatures, and the weak
luminescence of some of the diamonds required 15 to 20 hours of exposure time to
record the spectrum on photographic plates. Between 1942 and 1945, she published
five single-authored papers on the luminescence of diamonds and ruby. In August
1945 Zsubmitted her Ph.D. dissertation to the Madras University and was awarded a
government scholarship for an internship in England, where she specialised in
meteorological instrumentation.

Mani returned to Independent India in 1948. She joined the Indian Meteorological
Department at Pune, where she was in charge of construction of radiation
instrumentation. She published a number of papers on subjects ranging from
atmospheric ozone to the need for international instrument comparisons and
national standardisation of meteorological instrumentation. She retired as the
deputy director general of the Indian Meteorological Department in 1976 and
subsequently returned to the Raman Research Institute as a visiting professor for
three years. She published two books, The Handbook for Solar Radiation Data for
India (1980) and Solar Radiation over India (1981), and worked on a project for
harnessing wind energy in India in 1993. Despite her interest in, and involvement
with, issues of environment, Anna Mani ``got out of the business,'' as
environmentalists (``carpetbaggers'' as she called them) seemed to be ``always in
orbit.'' She preferred to stay in one place.

Gender Blind Science?

In an interview granted to the Bulletin of the World Meteorological Organisation

Anna Mani states, ``For myself, I must say that at no time did I experience
professional discrimination as a woman in what was considered largely a man's
world. I did not feel I was either penalised or privileged because of being
female.'' Yet, Mani's assertions that the institutions of science were gender
neutral did not reflect insensitivity to women's condition. Rather, Mani saw
herself as a beneficiary of the institutional and social privileges that accrued
to her class, in comparison with which the individualised gender discrimination
encountered in doing science faded into insignificance. Reminiscing about her
university days Mani recalled, ``In those days, we had respect only for the
leftists.'' Anna Mani had gravitated toward socialist politics during her years in
graduate school. She associated with left- leaning people, read socialist
literature, and considered herself quite ``enlightened.'' Egalitarian politics was
an integral part of her ideological makeup.

Anna Mani displayed a healthy disdain for victim politics as well. To the extent
that the discourse of discrimination carries with it aspersions of inequality, so
that personal achievement and success become contaminated with ``special
consideration'' and patronage, the stoic and proud Anna Mani would have no part of
it. ``I had worked hard to gain my academic qualifications and was judged fit to
carry out the work that was needed,'' she would insist when asked whether her
being a woman had any impact on her work. ``Selection for the scholarships at
Bangalore and in the United Kingdom had nothing to do with one's sex.''

Yet, as I asked Anna Mani about the social environment and the support of her
peers, a deep-seated hurt and anger surfaced. ``He was an odious man,'' she said,
referring to a colleague who had done his best to make the women feel inept, both
as scientists and as women. Any slight error the women made in handling
instrumentation or in setting up an experiment was immediately broadcast by some
men as a sign of female incompetence. When Mani audited a course on theoretical
physics, it was generally assumed that the material would be beyond her ken (which
Mani, with her characteristic humour, admits it was).

Raman maintained a strict separation of sexes in his laboratory. The crucial

practice of discussion and debate about scientific ideas among peers was denied to
women, rendering them peripheral to the scientific enterprise. Casual, informal
association with male colleagues was strictly out of bounds. Raman frowned upon
any interaction between men and women. Mani recalled how he would mutter
``Scandalous!'' every time a male and a female student walked together by his
window. With a touch of amusement, Mani noted that Raman must have had an uncanny
sense, for even while bending over a microscope, he would be able to catch a
glimpse of an ``offending'' couple. She remembered one incident vividly. She was
talking to Nagamani, one of her male colleagues in the laboratory. In the middle
of a sentence, Nagamani looked up to find Raman at a distance, cycling slowly
(``like a big bear'') toward them. Nagamani turned pale and fled the scene as fast
as he could, she recalled, "leaving me to face the music alone.''
Mani laughed at the recollection but communicated nevertheless the loneliness and
professional seclusion forced upon the women. Anna Mani remembered with gratitude
the warmth with which a few of her male colleagues, especially their wives,
welcomed her into their homes: ``Mrs. Venketeswaran, the wife of her immediate
supervisor at the Meteorological Department was like a goddess. She had not had
much education but was more broadminded than the so called educated people.''

As a graduate student, Mani became close to Mrs. Raman, who treated her ``as if I
was her own daughter.'' On a visit to a famous Hindu temple near Madras, Mrs.
Raman smuggled her into the inner sanctum, which was forbidden to non-Brahmins and
widows. The priest, horrified to see Anna Mani without red kumkum on her forehead,
which signifies a Hindu woman who is not a widow, was about to throw her out of
the sanctum when Mrs. Raman intervened. She deftly put kumkum on Mani's forehead
and chided her in front of the priest. ``Saraswati,'' she said, ``why are you so
careless about your appearance?'' Anna Mani told me that she was pleased Mrs.
Raman had referred to her as Saraswati, the goddess of learning and wisdom, and
not as Lakshmi, the goddess of wealth.

The scientific institutions, however, perpetuated their own gender biases. Anna
Mani was never granted a doctoral degree. Her completed Ph.D. dissertations remain
in the library of Raman Research Institute, indistinguishable from other bound
dissertations. Madras University, which at that time formally granted degrees for
work done at the Indian Institute of Science, claimed that Mani did not have a
M.Sc. degree, and therefore could not be granted a Ph.D.

Anna Mani represents the confluence of the modernising aspects of science,

nationalist, and gender ideologies. She is a success story to which few women (or
men) could aspire. She transcended the delimited cultural and physical spaces
available to her and created not only a room of her own, or a laboratory of her
own, but also a whole workshop, a mini-factory of her own. In the industrial
suburbs of Bangalore, Mani headed a small company that manufactures instruments
for measuring wind speed and solar energy. Here one witnessed an almost complete
reversal of gender roles. Some 30 workers, largely men, stood up with alacrity and
deference as Anna Mani walked in the door, much as schoolchildren rise from their
seats to greet their teachers. The gesture was both amusing and perplexing. The
unhesitant respect Mani commanded seemed refreshing. However, even as the gender
roles were being redefined, class relations remained intact and unfaltering in
Anna Mani's workshop.

There has been a lingering hope among feminists that the participation of large
numbers of women in traditionally male- dominated fields of inquiry would change
not only the institutional biases but also, more importantly, the very nature of
these fields. The slow trickle of women into the higher echelons of education in
the late nineteenth century did over time change the institutional response to
women. However, altering the very nature of science would have required a self-
conscious affirmation of gender identities by the women scientists in opposition
to the coercive womanhood forced upon them by their male colleagues and the
society at large. The received enlightenment of Anna Mani's generation was washed
clean of its tainted history — the history of exclusion of women and people of
colour from political participation in the West.

The constitution of Independent India granted equal rights to all citizens,

eliminating the need for Indian women to organise as women. The women of Indian
enlightenment were not gender-blind but perhaps mistakenly took gender equality
for granted. Indeed, toward the end of our many conversations Anna Mani, who until
then had steadfastly resisted the notion of gendered science, became wistful as
she began to realise that during the years when she had worn the mantle of
science, had had the authority to hire women as scientists, and could have been a
conscious role model for younger women, she had been unaware of the need to do so.

A low profile politician, Sucheta Kriplani would have been quite overawed when she
was offered to step into C.B. Gupta's shoes after he resigned. Probably there were
more senior and seasoned leaders in Gupta's cabinet to fit the bill but the Nehru
clan strangely enough handpicked Mrs. Kriplani for the prized post.
She administered Uttar Pradesh with a visible sense of fairness and transparency.
The first ever strike by the state employees continued for 62 days during her
regime. She relented only when the employees' leaders became restless for coming
to the talking table. Like a firm administrator she refused their demand for pay
hike but at the same time did not retrench a single one of them.

Sucheta hailed from an orthodox Bengali family. She was born in Ambala (Punjab) in
June, 1908. After teaching for a while in the Benaras Hindu University, she
decided to join the Congress Party. U.P. became her political pasture. She won an
assembly seat of Kanpur in a by-election in 1948. Elected to the Lok Sabha in 1952
and 1957, she was inducted as the minister for village and small-scale industries
in 1960. She again won an assembly seat from Kanpur in 1962 general elections.

Married to the famous socialist leader Acharya J.B. Kriplani, Suchetaji remained a
die hard Congress leader. The couple used to indulge in sweetly sarcastic remarks
about each other's political philosophy even in public. The made-for-each-other
couple was often found in late night movie shows even when Suchetaji was the chief
minister. In public functions Kriplaniji used to walk behind her illustrious wife
whereas in social occasions Suchetaji used to walk behind her husband like an
orthodox Indian wife.

After relinquishing the charge as the chief minister on March 13, 1967 due to the
expiry of the Vidhan Sabha term, Suchetaji got elected to the Lok Sabha again in
1967. An active office-bearer of several social organizations in Delhi, she died
on December 1, 1974.