Você está na página 1de 1

STRATEGIZING

Nick Rogan

• Find 1AC, do research to see if it is a viable option or


• Case Negs
o Look for links to DAs
o Case negs are much more than links to DAs
 Make sure you have adv. defense, pltx links,
 Look at cards on the wiki – read their ev
• Advocates for adv CPs, etc.
• Top-down strategizing
o Let your research guide your strategizing
o Disagrees about substance of the position
o Damien deference
o Start by finding how to make CP competitive – end up finding a NB
 Find solid NB – strong impacts
o Vary your strat
 Not always just impact calc – mechanism of implementation
o Emphasize key points

o Come up with good DAs, adv CPs, PICs to solve the whole case
o Affirmative won’t have defens eon specific CPs
o Vague plan text – solvency indicts, impact level indicts – cut ev that plan is implemented in a different
way than the aff wants there to be
 Ie. hooch “give water to Africa” aff

o Things to consider when looking at a plan text
 Look for terms for word PICS (counterinsurgency, pull-out, withdrawal, operations, etc.)
 Search “term counter insurgency” “word counter insurgency” on google
 Word PIC have a good strat
 International actors awill be a big deal on this topic
• Any adv about something positive the military needs to do (readiness, diversion,
overstretch)

 Include CPs that solve the aff
 Aff topically required to withdraw troops

o

Você também pode gostar