Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ADMINISTRATION - -
A BLOG SERIES ON THE OBAMA BLUNDERS.
EPISODE #2 – INVASION FROM WITHIN
UH
OH !
QUESTION: WHAT’S AAIEE ! ?
ANSWER: IT’S KIND OF A PRIMAL SCREAM - - AND AN ACRONYM.
(More below)
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS ATTACKED THE STATE
OF ARIZONA (AND EFFECTIVELY, ALL 50 STATES ) - - USING
A LEGAL BLUDGEON TO GET ITS WAY WITH REGARD TO
IGNORING CONTROL OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.
BUT ISN’T THIS A GROSS ABUSE OF FEDERAL
POWER ? SOME POINTS MADE IN THIS BLOG:
• ABANDONING THE CONSTITUTION WITH IMPUNITY
• THE SCARY SITUATION IN AZ AND SOME OTHER STATES
• JUDGE SUSAN BOLTON’S RULING
• A CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT PER ALAN KEYES
• A SHORT ANALOGY OF THE FED’S POSITION
• IS THE LEGAL BATTLE IMPORTANT TO THE PEOPLE ?
• A FEW SPECIFIC FACTS
• A MAJOR DEFECTION IS CAUSE FOR ALARM AND SUGGESTS
THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE
• AAIEE !
AMERICA IS
A POWERFUL
COUNTRY
- - WHY
SHOULD WE
WORRY ?
THERE’S
ALSO THE
MANY
PLAIN
LAWLESS-
NESS
TRAGEDIES
SO WHAT RIGHT DO THE FEDS HAVE TO STEP IN AND
UNDERCUT THE AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE TO PROTECT
ITS CITIZENS ?
NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER, SAYS ALAN
KEYES, FORMER CANDIDATE FOR THE
U.S. PRESIDENCY AND AN
ARTICULATE SPOKESMAN FOR THE
RULE OF LAW.
Keyes cites:
“(Article I, Section 10) of the U.S. Constitution that recognizes that
when one of the United States is "actually invaded," the state
government may act, without federal authorization, to defend itself.
Moreover, because of dereliction by the Federal gov’t, AZ and
several other States have been invaded, leading to damage and
loss of life for Citizens.
SO WHAT RIGHT DO THE FEDS HAVE TO STEP IN AND
UNDERCUT THE AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE TO PROTECT
ITS CITIZENS ?
ALAN KEYES ARGUED FURTHER
THAT THE RECENT RULING BY
FEDERAL JUDGE SUSAN BOLTON
AGAINST AZ, IS BOTH
ERRONEOUS AND IRRATIONAL:
“U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton seeks to suppress this clearly stated
constitutional prerogative (of every State). She claims that it is pre-empted by
the Federal government's refusal to enforce the existing federal laws. So a
prerogative established by the Supreme Law of the Land is somehow pre-empted
by the perjurious refusal of federal officials faithfully to carry out laws enacted
in accordance with the Constitution's provisions. In effect, this doctrine of “pre-
emptive dereliction ” replaces the rule of law with the lawless abuse of
authority. It aims to force the states to accept whatever damage the Federal
government chooses to inflict upon their citizens by its neglect of duty.”
LET’S LOOK AT THE FED’S LEGAL ARGUMENT A LITTLE
MORE CLOSELY:
JUDGE BOLTON vs THE CONSTITUTION
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE IS HIGHLY IMPORTANT
- - BUT LET’S NOT IGNORE THE LAWLESSNESS ASPECT,
WHICH CONTAINS THE HUMAN PART OF THIS SITUATION
AND INCLUDES THINGS LIKE:
Mark S