Part 1 – Food Safety and the Law.

Food safety management procedures

Guests choose a restaurant because they trust and believe that the establishment shall always fulfill their
demands and expectations both the expressed and unexpressed expectations. They trust that the food cooked in
the restaurant is safe to eat and will not make them sick after eating. Providing customers with safe food is not
only important for the success of a business but also mandatory by law.

A Food safety Management Program which is intended to prevent food poisoning by following safe food
preparation practices; this involves taking measures necessary to ensure the safety and wholesomeness of food
during purchasing, receiving, storing, cooking, transporting, reheating and service. A Food safety Management
Program is a program developed to control food safety problems and ensure that the food served is safe to eat.
It is based upon the principles of HACCP. It involves looking at the food preparation and service operation step
by step from the selection of ingredients right through to the service of the food to the customer. By carefully
analyzing each step of the food preparation and service operation anything that may affect the safety of the food
is identified and controlled. Food safety Management Program helps in ensuring that food is safe at all times and
the risk of food poisoning is minimized / prevented

Why is Food safety Management Program important?

The following are the costs resulting from food poisoning:
• Closure of food premises by local authority.
• Loss of business due to negative publicity or from guests due to poor standards, food poisoning outbreaks
and even deaths. The reputation of the establishment is tarnished.
• Fines and costs of legal action taken because of not following hygiene legislations or because of sale of
food that is unsafe for consumption. Court cases and law suits taken by food poisoning sufferers or those
aggrieved by injury from foreign bodies in food.
• Low employee morale and high staff turnover, as the working conditions are of poor standards.
• Guest’s complaints in regards to food will increase.
• Loss of food, food shall have to be thrown out as it has become unsafe for consumption, thereby increasing
costs and reducing profitability.
• Employees will loose their jobs because of closure of the business or because they have become long term
carriers of food poisoning organisms especially salmonella.

The benefits of Food safety Management Program are as follows:

• Delighted guests.
• Enhanced reputation as an establishment where food is produced in a hygienic environment and is safe for
consumption.
• Increase in business.
• Compliance with food safety regulations.
• Less food wastage and increased shelf life, thereby reduction in food costs and increase in profitability.
• Higher employee morale as they know that they are working in a clean, safe and hygienic environment.

Food safety is very important as stated above. It is a crime punishable by Law to serve food that is unfit for
consumption.

FOOD SAFETY AND THE LAW:

The constant increase in government regulations has made food safety a critical issue for every organization,
and a vital responsibility of management. Widespread media attention has also increased public awareness of
food crises and scares, public concern over the effects of major food safety, product recall and food poisoning.
Assuring food safety throughout the chain minimizes the risk of contaminated food entering a establishment.
The requirements of food safety legislation are increasingly directed at the implementation of the principles of
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) within food manufacturing establishments. To comply
with food safety requirements it is important to incorporate a system that identifies the food safety hazards and
the important controls associated with menu items, the training of food handlers, and the regular audits carried
out that will assess current performance as well as identify training needs and corrective actions to be taken.

Johann D’souza Page 1 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

In the UK, The Food Safety Act (1990) (FSA) Act incorporates most of the previous Food Safety Regulations. It
is ‘enabling’ legislation, allowing for the making of new regulations, modifications of existing regulations and
the adoption of European Law. It has enabled subsequent regulations to be introduced, e.g.
Food Premises (Registrations) Regulations 1991, Food Safety (General Food Hygiene)
Regulations 1995, Food Safety (Temperature Control) Regulations 1995 and Food Labeling
Regulations1996.

0102. The FSA (1990) is the overarching food safety legislation in England, Wales and
Scotland. It introduced a number of features for the enforcement of food hygiene and
Enabled subsequent regulations to be introduced.
0103. There are a number of offences under the Act:
a. Selling food that is not of the nature, substance or quality demanded by the purchaser.
b. Falsely describing, advertising or presenting food.
c. Rendering food injurious to health.
d. Selling food that does not comply with food safety requirements. This is food that has been rendered injurious
to health (e.g. through contamination with food poisoning organisms) or which is unfit for human consumption.
0104. The definition of selling food includes food that is offered, displayed, advertised by and / or in possession
of and is in the food business.

FOOD SAFETY (GENERAL FOOD HYGIENE) REGULATIONS 1995

0105. The Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 apply to any premises
Where in the preparation, processing, storage or handling of food is undertaken. They detail
key requirements in the following areas:
a. Structure. Premises where food is prepared must comply with a series of structural, maintenance and
cleanliness requirements. These are designed to protect food from physical contamination, permit good food
hygiene practices and prevent external sources of contamination such as pests.
b. Hygiene. There is a general requirement that any operation involving the preparation, processing, storage or
handling of food is carried out in a hygienic way.
c. Hazard Analysis. A manager of a food business shall identify any step in the activities of the food business
that is critical to ensuring food safety, and ensure that adequate safety procedures are identified, implemented,
maintained and reviewed. This procedure is designed to ensure compliance with Regulation 4(3) of the Food
Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995.
d. Infected Food Handlers. Food handlers must inform their line manager if they or any member of their
household are suffering from, or suspect that they may be suffering from, any infection that may be transmitted
through food, e.g. gastrointestinal infection. Infected lesions of skin, eyes, ears and mouth that may directly or
indirectly contaminate food with pathogenic micro-organisms are also to be reported. Appropriate exclusion
procedures are to be taken pending medical advice.
e. Training. All food handlers must be supervised, instructed and/or trained in food hygiene matters
commensurate with their work activity.

FOOD SAFETY (TEMPERATURE CONTROL) REGULATIONS 1995

0106. These regulations contain national provisions relating to the temperature control of food. They detail
limits for holding hot and cold food at temperatures designed to reduce the risk of bacteriological activity which
may give rise to food poisoning.

FOOD PREMISES (REGISTRATION) REGULATIONS 1991

0107. Food premises must be registered under the Act if they store or serve food. In addition to publicly funded
messes, non-public bars and welfare outlets will also be included in the registration process. The
Commanding Officer (CO) is also to appoint an officer to oversee non-public catering facilities. Vehicles used
to transport food around unit sites also have to be registered.
0108. The FSA applies to any catering establishment, which, by definition, is ‘an establishment where food is
prepared on the premises for delivery to the ultimate consumer and is ready for consumption without further
preparation’. Penalties under the Act vary according to the precise nature of the offence. The maximum on
summary conviction is a fine of up to £20,000 or 6 months imprisonment, or both. Precautions taken to ensure
the prevention of food poisoning i.e. Due Diligence apply in all circumstances.

FOOD LABELLING REGULATIONS 1996

0109. These regulations detail measures required to protect purchasers and consumers from false or misleading
information when purchasing food. The two most important provisions from the food hygiene viewpoint are
those relating to indication of durability, and storage conditions or conditions of use:

Johann D’souza Page 2 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

a. Indication of Durability. Most pre-packed foods must be date marked.
There are two types of date mark:
(1) “Use By” Date. Foods that are microbiologically perishable and may pose a risk to health must bear a “Use
By” date. This is the more stringent of the two indicators of durability. It is to be noted that it is an offence to
sell, or have in possession for sale, food bearing an expired “use by” date and for anyone other than the person
originally responsible for applying the date mark to change it.
(2) “Best Before” Date. The majority of foods have a “best before” date, which indicates the period for which it
might be expected to retain its specific properties if stored correctly. A “Best Before” date relates to the quality
of food rather than safety.
b. Storage Conditions or Conditions of Use. Where particular storage conditions are required to maintain
specific properties of food, e.g. “keep refrigerated” or “keep frozen”. These instructions must be stated on the
label.

DUE DILIGENCE
0110. A key concept of the FSA is that of ‘Due Diligence’. This is essentially a defense in the event of
prosecution and requires evidence that the person charged took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due
diligence to avoid committing the offence. In effect, it enables an enforcement authority to “by-pass” an
immediate offender and prosecutes the real offender. The defendant has to prove that due diligence has been
exercised and this is where the importance of keeping records is crucial.
0111. In practice, the due diligence defense will consist of two stages:
a. ‘To take all reasonable precautions’ means that a system is in place to prevent an offence from occurring.
Areas of consideration will include:
(1) Food Safety Policy in accordance with Food Policy Statement.
(2) Hazard Analysis systems.
(3) Staff training programmes.
(4) Available resources, e.g. technical, staffing, financial.
(b) Secondly, exercising due diligence, which concerns day-to-day operation of the system. A court of law
would usually require documented evidence that procedures were carried out at a relevant time and by an
appropriate person. The usual requirements include details of the following:
(1) Cleaning schedules.
(2) Temperature monitoring e.g. dedicated transportation vehicles, temperature at time of receipt, cooking and
service, and monitoring of freezers and refrigerators.
(3) Documentation of any corrective action taken.
(4) Documentation of supervisory checks.
(5) Records kept up to date at all times and available for inspection by local authority enforcement officers.

About food law enforcement in the UK.

The enforcement of regulations on food standards is primarily the responsibility of local authorities.
Who is responsible for enforcement?
Responsibility for enforcement is shared between central and local government bodies. While the making of
legislation in the UK is the function of central government, the enforcement of food law is primarily (but not
solely) the responsibility of the 499 local authorities in the UK, and more specifically Environmental Health
Officers (EHOs) and Trading Standards Officers (TSOs).

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is an independent Government Department and is an enforcement authority
in its own right. It is also responsible for enforcement support, advice and audit of enforcement activity with
respect to local authority food safety and standards controls.

Central government role

Where food law enforcement does not rest with local authorities, it is carried out by central Government or its
enforcement agencies.
The FSA, acting through its executive agency the Meat Hygiene Service (MHS) in England, Scotland and
Wales, and through the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DARD) Veterinary Service in
Northern Ireland, is the enforcement authority in respect of around 1,700 licensed premises in the UK producing
meat for sale for human consumption. Such premises include slaughterhouses, cutting plants and cold stores.
Inspection of the meat industry is essential to protect public health and promote consumer confidence. More
information about the MHS can be found at the link below. Formal enforcement, including prosecutions and
investigations, is the responsibility of the Agency itself.

Johann D’souza Page 3 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

The Agency aims to ensure that EU wine regulations are enforced in the UK. Our enforcement responsibilities
apply to all premises and traders within the production and marketing chain, including wholesalers, warehouses
and vineyards. More information about wine standards can be found at the link below.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has two executive agencies - the Pesticides
Safety Directorate (PSD) and the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) - which carry out European Union
(EU) surveillance programs for residues, and also act as the enforcement agencies for these areas.
Inspectors within Defra enforce areas such as marketing and horticulture, at all but the retail level. There are
also separate arrangements for dairy hygiene enforcement, which is the responsibility of Animal Health (an
executive agency of Defra).
The Egg Marketing Inspectorate (EMI) is an Inspectorate within Defra responsible for checking standards in egg
production, packaging and distribution centers. EMI works throughout England and Wales, wherever eggs are
produced, graded, packaged, imported, exported, bought or sold. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own
Inspectors.

Dubai Municipality Grading System to rate food preparation & Fines imposed to food preparation
premises not complying with the law

Dubai Municipal Food Control Inspectors grade food preparation establishment by using the following criteria.
They use the points systems 90 points and above ensure that the establishment secures “A” grade this means that
the food premises shall be inspected once every 3 months.
A score of 90 and below up to 70 means an inspection every month. This establishment shall receive a “B”
Grade.
A score of below 70 up to 60 means an inspection every week, this establishment shall receive a “C” Grade

Dubai Municipal Food Control Inspectors are authorized to fine establishments not complying with the
legislations, Please find below the checklist that is used by the inspectors for fining establishments not
complying. Attached at the end of this document are The violation sheet of Dubai Municipality, They use the
grading system based on points to grade food establishments A, B and C .Catering establishments here in Dubai
are governed by the Food Hygiene Regulations of 1992 i.e. Administrative order no 20 of 1992 issued on the
3rd of February 1992.

Dubai Municipalities directive for implementation of HACCP:

All Hotels in Dubai have been given a deadline to implement HACCP in their operations by the end of the year
and need to be certified by a third party auditor who has been approved by the municipality. New Hotels are
allowed a maximum of 6 months to get their hotels HACCP Certified.

Dubai municipality’s legislations give details on every aspect that of the food chain and what is expected from
the Hotel. Non conformance to the Dubai Municipality’s directive results in warning and fines.

Please find attatched the Annexes i.e. grading system and memo’s from Dubai Municipality which provides
more insight.

Annexes:
DM Memo on Health Cards.
DM Memo on transport of food stuffs in Dubai.
DM Memo on visitors in food establishments.
DM Excel spreadsheet on Inspection checklist for grading.
DM Violation and Fines sheet.
Local Order No (11) of 2003.

******************************************************************************************

Johann D’souza Page 4 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

PART 2 – Role of Management:

Management needs to formulate a Food Safety Policy detailing the scope, use and purpose of food safety in the
establishment. The food safety management system should be based on HACCP and should also take into
consideration local legislations. Thus the food safety program, the implementation of which will provide each of
the catering operations are adhering to good working practices, guidelines and policies assuring that the food
they serve is safe and of good quality. In doing so, each unit will have a reduced exposure to business risks
arising from food contamination scares, adverse publicity or brand damage.

How to develop a Food Safety Management System:

The following are the Steps to be taken developing the system. It lists the steps typical in most catering
operations, likely hazards to be considered, outlines the controls which apply generally to most catering
operations and advises on when and how these should be applied. It also gives advice on the identification of
other critical control points, and on practical monitoring procedures, and on the causes of food poisoning. Food
Safety Program is suitable for same day service, complex food cook process and No Cook Food step operations.

FOOD SAFETY POLICY

Management should define and document a food safety policy, which is supported by measurable objectives and
appropriate to the role of the organization in the food chain.
The objectives include the following, and will be assessed on a continual basis:
1. Maximum of 5 food items rejected at receiving per month for food safety related issues.
2. Maximum of 20 food-safety related customer complaints per year
3. Safe working environment, and adequate of suitable materials and equipment.
4. Maximum of 5 equipment or machinery breakdowns in food areas per month.
5. All food handlers will be competent by three months of their employment
6. Minimum of 90% to be scored in both internal and third party food safety audits
7. No major non-conformances identified in HACCP audits.
8. 100% compliance to relevant legal requirements.
The policy takes into consideration the organization’s conformance with both statutory and regulatory
requirements, as well as any mutually agreed food safety requirements of customers.
The food safety policy shall be communicated to all staff during the employee orientation training, and by being
posted in front of the staff cafeteria, changing rooms and staff notice boards. The management will also ensure
that the policy is implemented, maintained and reviewed for continued suitability.

THE FOLLOWING STEPS NEED TO BE FOLLOWED IN PLANNING, DESINING ANF

IMPLEMETATION OF A FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:

Step 1: Planning
Top Management should first select and hire a Food Hygiene Officer to implement and manage the food safety
system. The food hygiene officer could be assisted with an external Food Safety HACCP Consultant to ensure
the HACCP implementation and certification of the establishment.
Top Management along with the Food Hygiene Officer and HACCP Consultant must formulate a Food Safety
Management policy and formulate a team to implement, overlook and monitor HACCP. Staff will need to be
made aware of any changes that may result from its introduction can be kept up to date.
Depending on the size of the business assemble staff into a small team, with a team leader to lead in designing
and implementing HACCP. The team should have a good knowledge of the business. Initially, the team will be
required to spend a reasonable amount of time and effort to develop and implement the HACCP system.
Describe the product(s) and the intended use by consumers and then depending on the size of the business draw
up a flow diagram to show each step of the operation. Walk through the operation to confirm that the diagram is
correct and check that it covers all the foods your business produces.

The management should have defined objectives to support the food safety policy and which would also provide
a measure of the suitability and effectiveness of the management system in place. The following have been
taken into consideration while setting the objectives:
1. Food safety policy
2. Customer requirements and expectations
3. Product and process requirements
4. Available resources
5. Statutory and regulatory requirement.

Johann D’souza Page 5 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

The planning of the Food Safety Management Systems has been carried out over several stages, namely:
• Designing of the Food Safety Management Systems procedures and policies.
• Development of operational prerequisites specific to the operations.
• Development of the HACCP system that takes into consideration the various products and processes as per
Codex Alimentarius.
• Development of the Food Safety Management Systems Manual that to ensure consistency in quality and
achievement of food safety standard, and to ensure continual improvement of the processes.
Whenever changes to the products or processes are made, the plans shall be reviewed by the top management so
as to ensure that the integrity of the food safety management system is maintained.

Step 2: Food Safety Program Team

Depending on the size of the operation, the planning, development and implementation of the system should be
undertaken by a team. The members of the team should be able to identify hazards, control measures and critical
control points confidently, so an understanding of food hygiene is required, as well as a complete view of each
step of the catering operation under consideration.

RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY

The top management has defined and communicated the responsibilities and authorities of relevant personnel
involved in managing of the food safety management system so as to ensure the effective operation and
maintenance of the system.
The overall responsibility of ensuring safe food lies with the General Manager. However, detailed and specific
responsibilities and authorities of personnel that have been assigned the responsibility and/or authority to report
problems, or initiate and record actions are defined in the job descriptions, as well as in the Prerequisite,
HACCP and Food Safety Management Systems manuals. The responsibilities and authorities of relevant
personnel involved in managing of the food safety management system will be communicated upon
employment, and reinforced during successive training sessions.

FOOD SAFETY TEAM LEADER & FOOD SAFETY TEAM MEMBERS:

The Food Hygiene Officer has been appointed by the top management as the food safety team leader who,
irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have the responsibility and authority to:
1. manage a food safety team and organize its work,
2. ensure relevant training and education of the food safety team members,
3. ensure that the food safety management system is established, implemented, maintained and updated
4. report to the organization’s top management on the effectiveness and suitability of the food safety
management system, and liaison with external parties on matters relating to the food safety management
system

In the absence of The Food Hygiene Officer, The Executive Chef will be acting as the Food Safety team leader.
The following would be members of the Food Hygiene Management Team:
General Manager, Food Hygiene Officer, Food and Beverage Manager, Executive Chef, Director of
Engineering, Executive House Keeper, Purchasing Manager, Food and Beverage Cost Controller, Store
Supervisor, Training Manager & Human Resources Manager.

Roles and Responsibilities should be given to the members to ensure that implementation of the Food Safety
Management Systems has been successfully integrated in the Hotels culture.

DESIGNATION: - EXECUTIVE CHEF

• To ensure that food being cooked is cooked safely according to the food safety regulations.
• Update status on policies relating to the Food Preparation (Implementation, training & follow up).

DESIGNATION: PURCHASING MANAGER

• Report and share with team members on visitation to supplier’s premises.
• Report on Supplier quality Assurance program, Names of approved suppliers etc.

DESIGNATION: FACILITIES MANAGER

• Update on status on policies related to Engineering Division (Implementation, training & follow up).
• Update team with planned Preventive Maintenance for coming weeks.
• Provide feedback on water testing, tank cleaning and equipment calibration.

Johann D’souza Page 6 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

DESIGNATION: - FOOD & BEVERAGE MANAGER.
• Update on status on policies related to F&B Division (Implementation, training & follow up).
• Update on Large Function challenges in regards to food safety, Food Borne Illness if any, Expiry Items,
Guest complaints in regards to food illness, Bar Hygiene and Dishwashing cleanliness.
• Share with team on overall staffs grooming standard.

DESIGNATION (S): - COST CONTROLLER & STORES SUPERVISOR

• Update on status on policies related to Receiving & Stores Department.
• Update team with data collection report spot check conducted on suppliers’ truck, Supplier concerns,
Summary of Items rejected etc at receiving area.

DESIGNATION: - EXECUTIVE HOUSEKEEPER.

• Update team on cleaning & sanitation of Loading Dock, Restaurant Cleanliness, Food and Beverage Public
Area Cleanliness status directly related to Food Hygiene and Food Safety.
• Update team on Pest situation, Bait maps, and treatment date by Pest operator.

DESIGNATION: - HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER

• Report and share with team on issues of Medical Facilities & First Aid.
• Report and share with team status of Dubai Municipality Health Cards for Food Handlers.
• Report and share results of Medical Health Spot Check and Food Handlers Hand Swab Test Results carried
out by the Hotel Nurse
• Report and Share with team on issues of Medical Examination being conducted for staff who have returned
from Vacation.
• Share with team on the consistency of training and hours clocked by individual department in relation to
food hygiene.

STEP 3: HAZARD ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT.

In most cases this will mean that the first step will be to look at the purchase of ingredients or other foods used
in the business and carry out the following tasks:
• Identify hazards.
• Identify control measures
• Determine critical control points (CCP’s)
• Implement the system for the purchase part of the operation before moving onto the next step.

Step 3a: List ALL HAZARDS

List the hazards associated with food at the first step of the operation. This may require help from professional
food safety consultants.
Hazard means a biological, chemical or physical property that may cause an unacceptable public health risk.
The potential to cause harms. Hazards may be biological, chemical or physical e.g. Salmonella specifies in a
chicken burger (Biological Hazard), detergent in milk (chemical hazard) or glass in breakfast cereals (Physical
Hazard). A number of things may constitute a food hazard, for instance the contamination of food with food
poisoning bacteria or other micro-organisms or their toxins (poisons which they produce) foreign bodies
chemical contaminants

Step 3B: IDENTIFY CONTROL MEASURES.

List the measures which can be used to eliminate or reduce to safe levels the identified hazards. Control
measures may be very simple, e.g. when looking at purchasing: The hazard may be the multiplication of food
poisoning bacteria in foods because the temperature is too high.
The control measure may be having purchasing specifications which asks for temperature controlled deliveries
(which can then be checked or monitored). Some hazards do not need to be eliminated when they occur as they
may be controlled later, e.g. in the preparation or cooking of the food. In this case they can be dealt with at the
step. However, this does not mean that good hygiene standards should not be maintained throughout all steps in
the catering operation. Make sure that control measures are actually feasible in the business / kitchen where they
are to be operated, or they may not be used.

Step 3c: Critical Control Points

Critical Control Points (CCP’s) should be identified. The critical control point is the step in the preparation of
the food which has to be carried out correctly to ensure that a hazard is eliminated or reduced to a safe level.

Johann D’souza Page 7 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

The following actions need to be taken at these Critical Control Points. They are likely to be other critical
control points in a given operation which will need to be considered.

STEP HAZARD ACTION

Purchase High risk foods Buy from reputable supplier only. Specify temperatures required at
contaminated with food delivery. Supplier quality assurance program, Supplier Audits.
poisoning bacteria or toxins.

Receipt High risk foods Visual / sensory checks. Temperature checks. Transportation
contaminated with food vehicle checks, delivery personnel personal hygiene checks, separate
poisoning bacteria or toxins. weighing scales for frozen & chilled meat products, non chilled / low
risk items and separate for ready to eat products.

Storage Growth of food poisoning High risk foods stored at safe temperatures. Store wrapped. Rotate
bacteria, toxins on high risk stock & use before expiry. Chilled products storage below 5 deg C,
foods. Further Frozen items stored at -18Deg C and dry foods stored at below 22
contamination. Deg C and less than 60% Humidity.

Preparation Contamination of high risk
foods. Growth of
pathogenic bacteria.
Cooking Survival of pathogenic
bacteria.
Limited exposure to ambient temps. During preparation. Prepare
with clean equipment, used for high risk foods only. Separate
cooked and raw foods. Wash hands before handling foods.
Cook rolled joints, chicken and reformed meats e.g. burgers to at
least 75°C in the thickest part. Sear the outside of other meats (e.g.
joints of beef, steaks) before cooking).

Cooling Growth of any surviving Cool foods quickly as possible. Do not leave out at room temps cool
spores or pathogens. Toxin unless cooling period is short (e.g. place stews, rice etc in shallow
production Contamination tray and cool to chill temperatures quickly).Blast chill products to
with pathogenic bacteria. below 4 Deg C from 90 Deg C within 90 Minutes.

Hot holding Growth of pathogenic Hot hold food in hot cabinets above 65°C.
bacteria. Toxin production.

Reheating Survival of pathogenic Reheat to 82°C.

bacteria.

Chilled storage Growth of pathogenic Temp. Control; Stock rotation. Keep items below 5 Deg C.
bacteria.
Service Growth of pathogens. Cold service – serve high risk foods as soon as possible after
Toxin production. removing from chiller. Hot foods – serve high risk foods quickly.
Contamination.

HOW TO DETERMINE CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS

The following questions can be used to help to determine critical control points at each step:
(1) Question: Is it necessary to control the hazard at this step, or will a subsequent step reduces or eliminate the
hazard?
For example: At the purchase or preparation step
Raw ingredients may contain food poisoning bacteria but the cooking step will, if carried out correctly, reduce
these to safe levels.
* Therefore in this case the purchase and preparation step is not a Critical Control Point.
* If a subsequent step (e.g. cooking) will control the hazard, then that step is the Critical Control Point.

(2) Question: Can the hazard be eliminated or reduced to acceptable levels at all, at this step or any step?
If the answer is ‘no’, consideration should be given to whether the food is served at all. Different ingredients or
changes to be preparation / cooking method may need to be considered so that the food is safe when served to
the consumer.

Johann D’souza Page 8 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

TARGETS AND CRITICAL LIMITS
For each CCP, a target should be set which gives the required control. Variations from that level which are
considered acceptable before corrective action is taken are the critical limits.
For example, in the instruction:
Reheat precooked dishes to 75°C or hotter (if the food has reached 73°C the food may be served, allowing a 2°C
tolerance.)
* The target value is 75°C
* The critical limit for reheating is 82°C or above.

Step 3d: Decide how to monitor and, if necessary, record that the controls have been applied.
Critical Control Points must be monitored. The frequency of monitoring will depend upon the nature of the
control, practicality, and the level of confidence the monitoring procedure gives.
Monitoring
The methods used should be kept as simple as possible, for example:
• On delivery, visual check of packaging, expiry dates
• The measurement of the temperature
• checking that all equipment is cleaned before use

RECORDING
Wherever possible, records should be kept as these will help the manager check that food safety measures are
adequate and working.
Records will also provide useful information if there is a query from the Municipality officials. The type of
equipment available to monitor some critical control points may automatically give records, e.g. automatic
logging devices connected to all chiller and freezer units, giving a printed read-out.
Where manual checks are taken at a critical control point and the manager decides that it is necessary to keep
records, consideration will need to be given to the type of recording sheets needed. These should be kept as
simple as possible, and training must be given to staff to ensure that records are completed correctly.

STEP 3E: IMPLEMENTATION AND HOW TO MANAGE THE CHANGE TO FOOD SAFETY PROGRAM?
1. Prepare, print and if necessary copy any record sheets.
2. Consider developing working instructions for the controls, and monitoring procedures for staff to refer to,
particularly where a critical control point is identified. These should be simple and clear.
3. Procedures and work instructions should include:
• What is to be done?
• How it is to be done
• When it is to be done
• Where it is to be done
• Who is to do it
4. Tell staff why checks or measurements need to be taken.
5. Train staff as necessary in the basic principles of the Hotel Food Safety Management System approach.
6. Ensure staff understands their responsibilities so that the system can be implemented successfully.
7. Ensure that instructions, procedures and training cover what to do if a critical control point is not achieved.
For example: place food back into the oven and inform the manager immediately, throw the food away.
Important note – control measures may involve taking temperatures using a probe thermometer. Training
should be given so that this is done properly including giving instructions on cleaning the probe between uses.
Probes should be accurate and checked frequently.

STEP 3F: CHECKING THE SYSTEM

Once the Hotel Food Hygiene Management System for the first step is in operation, it may be necessary to
check it to ensure:
1. That it is running as originally planned and / or that the monitoring of CCP’s is satisfactory
2. The revised system should follow the one that was originally devised with changes being made only after
careful consideration.

STEP 4: REPEAT STEP 3 FOR EACH CATERING STEP

The manager or the Food Safety Program team can now attend to the next step on the flow chart (e.g. receipt of
food). For this next step on the flow chart, the same processes (3a to 3f) as before are carried out:
• listing hazards

Johann D’souza Page 9 of 15 Food Safety Assignment.

• Identifying control measures
• deciding upon critical control points
• deciding upon adequate and suitable monitoring and recording procedures, as necessary
• implementing and checking
This process is then repeated until the Food Safety Program is running for all steps of the catering operation.

STEP 5: FULL SYSTEM CHECK

The full system will need to be checked to ensure that it is working as was originally intended.
This will mean ensuring Critical Control Points identified during the development of the system are:
• Being applied correctly
• Being adequately monitored
• Accompanied with adequate work instructions
• In addition, check to ensure that:
• The system is understood
• That all parts of the system are working compatibly
• This can be carried out by the team leader or manager by means of an internal audit.

STEP 6: FULL SYSTEM REVIEW / MANAGEMENT REVIEW.

The top management will review the organization’s food safety management system at least once yearly to
ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness. However, in order to provide continual
improvement to the system, the food safety team representing the top management will meet at least once
monthly to review audit findings.
REVIEW INPUT
The input to management review shall include, but is not limited to, information on
• Follow-up actions from previous management reviews,
• Incident reports from observations of daily operations, and records review
• Analysis of results of verification activities,
• Changing circumstances that can affect food safety,
• Emergency situation, accidents and withdrawals or recalls,
• Reviewing results of system-updating activities,
• Review of communication activities, including customer feed-back, and
• External audits or inspections.
• The data presented from these meetings shall enable top management to relate the information to stated
objectives of the food safety management system.
 REVIEW OUTPUT
The output from the management review shall include decisions and actions related to the following:
• Food safety,
• Improvement of the effectiveness of the food safety management system,
• Resource needs, and
• Revisions of the organization’s food safety policy and related objectives.

MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT
Management Commitment is essential to the effective food safety system implementation and execution and this
must be demonstrated by establishments Food Hygiene Team. This is judged by the number of Food Hygiene
team meetings held, the frequency with which the Management / Hygiene Team Members attend these
meetings, the control exercised by Management to ensure that Internal Audits of the policies are undertaken
with the correct frequency. This will ensure that the staff will apply the Food Safety Management Systems
policies to minimize Food Safety Risk. The top management should be committed to the development and
implementation of the food safety management system and to continually improving its effectiveness.

Management must ensure that food safety is supported by the business objectives of the organization by:
1. Including hygiene as a performance indicator, obtained from customer feedback
2. Business is driven by revenue management instead cost cutting.
3. No compromise is undertaken on any issues that may affect the safety of products.
4. Marketing its commitment to food safety when selling and organizing catering events.
5. Budgeting for resources, investments or costs related to food safety.
6. The top management will ensure that staff at all levels in the company are communicated of the importance
of meeting the requirements of this International Standard, any statutory and regulatory requirements, as
well as customer requirements relating to food safety through.

Johann D’souza Page 10 of 15 Food Safety

Assignment.
7. Regular Hygiene Team and Top Management meetings.
8. Internal staff notices boards and posters.
9. Hygiene Training and workshops.

Internal Audits & Verification:

To ensure that Food Hygiene Program Policies are:
1. Kept up to date and effective by regularly reviewing the hazards and the processes.
2. The hotel is complying with implementing the regulations of the Dubai Municipality.
3. Hygienic conditions and facilities are evaluated.
4. Hazards to food and safety are determined and controlled.

To reduce the risk of unsafe food by taking preventive measures to assure the safety and suitability of food at an
appropriate stage in the operation by controlling food hazards.
Establish procedures for the conduct of internal and external hygiene audits, which shall verify the level of
hygiene activities and determine the effectiveness of the food safety management system in place. The audits
shall be scheduled at a frequency deemed necessary for the activities being audited.
o The following audits shall be conducted:
1. Daily Departmental Self Audit.
2. Monthly Internal Audit by Hotel’s Food Hygiene Team Members.
3. Quarterly Internal Audit by a Panel of the Hotel’s Food Hygiene Team.
4. External 2nd Party Audit by an External company minimum once every 6 months.
o The audits should cover all food areas and any other areas that are likely to affect the safety of the
operations and that of the food.
o The results of the audits shall be recorded and brought to the attention of the employees responsible for the
area audited.
o Appropriate and timely corrective measures shall be taken to address any non-conformances raised during
the audits.
o Any new information regarding hazards or processes that are likely to affect the effectiveness of the
HACCP system in place shall also be taken into consideration and the HACCP plan shall be revised
accordingly.

VALIDATION OF CONTROL MEASURE COMBINATIONS

The food safety team has planned and implemented the processes needed to validate control measures and/or
control measure combinations, and to verify and improve the food safety management system
o Prior to implementation of control measures to be included in operational prerequisites programs and the
HACCP plan and after any change therein, the Hotel has validated that:
1. The selected control measures are capable of achieving the intended control of the food safety hazards
for which they are designated, and
2. The control measures are effective and capable of, in combination, ensuring control of the identified
food safety hazards to obtain end products that meet the defined acceptable levels.
o If the result of the validation shows that one or both of the above elements cannot be confirmed, the control
measure and/or combinations thereof will be modified and reassessed.
o Modifications may include changes in control measures (i.e. process parameters, intensities and/or their
combination) and/or changes in the raw materials, manufacturing technologies, end product characteristics,
and methods of distribution and/or intended use of the end product.

CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
The top management will ensure that the Hotel continually improves the effectiveness of the food safety
management system through the use of: Communication ,Management review, Internal audit, Evaluation of
individual verification results, Analysis of results of verification activities, Validation of control measure
combinations & Corrective actions and Food safety Program policies are updated.

UPDATING THE FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The top management will ensure that the food safety management system is continually updated. In order to
achieve this, the food safety team will evaluate the food safety management system at planned intervals.
The team will then consider whether it is necessary to review the hazard analysis, the established operational
prerequisites programs and the HACCP plan.
The evaluation and updating activities will be based on:
o Input from communication (external as well as internal).

Johann D’souza Page 11 of 15 Food Safety

Assignment.
o Input from other information concerning the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the food safety
management system.
o Output from the analysis of results of verification activities and Output from management review.

System updating activities will be recorded and reported, in an appropriate manner, as input to the management
review.

******************************************************************************************

Part 3
Investigation into Food Safety Controls in a Food Business
The hotel has 3 restaurants with 3 kitchens where in food is cooked in these kitchens and food and beverage is
served in these restaurants. There are currently 60 Chefs, 70 Waiters, 25 Stewards, 2 in Purchasing, 3 in
Receiving and 4 storekeepers.
The hotel has a food safety program in place and is undergoing HACCP Certification with the consultancy stage
over, HACCP Manual in place and HACCP Implemented. The preliminary certification HACCP Audit revealed
the following:

Audit Findings:

1. Finding: Hazard Analysis has not been done for live Crabs and Lobsters in Fish Tank.
• A fish tank was found in the Fish Preparation Kitchen located in the Main Kitchen (The fish section
area is where all the raw fish is cut etc). The fish tank contained live Crabs and Lobsters. The tanks was
owned and maintained by the suppliers. Whenever there is an order for crabs and lobsters, they were
taken out of the tanks cut, cleaned and used for cooking and served. The audit inspection revealed that
Hazard analysis was not done for the live Crabs and the Lobsters in the Fish Tank in Fish Preparation
Area.
Recommendations:
• Hazard Analysis requires to be done for the live seafood and lobsters. This would be a Control point in
the operations. The supplier requires sending Health Certificates for the live seafood being delivered
along with Certificate of Analysis.
• The receiving staff requires requesting the supplier’s delivery personnel and checking the Health
Certificates and Certificate of analysis. They need to check the cleanliness and temperature of the
delivery vehicle (Below 8 Deg C for transporting live seafood).They need to check the personal
hygiene of the driver and the loading helper. They need to check the seafood that it is delivered in a
clean and thermo cool box. The crabs and lobsters are alive and healthy and there is no awful smell and
most importantly that they are not injured or damaged.
• The water tank requires maintenance to be carried out at least once a week by the fish supplier. Records
of the following need to be maintained by the fish preparation chef of the work carried out by the
supplier i.e. cleanliness, water filter cleaning, PH Checking and Salinity testing.
• Calibration of the thermometer displaying the temperature of the tank should be carried out at least
once a year. The chef requires checking that the seafood is alive every 6 hours and notes the
temperature of the water in the tanks on the recording form.
• Water tests should be carried out and send for laboratory analysis.

2. Finding: During the audit it was found that the room service toaster was dirty. There was no cleaning and
disinfection procedure in the manual for this equipment. The cleaning schedule was not update to include
this machine on the list.
Recommendations:
• There should be a cleaning and disinfection policy for toaster. The cleaning schedule needs to be
updated to include the toaster with details on when to clean, how to clean & disinfect safety precautions
and who should clean.

3. Finding: There were no labels for expiry date on Small bottles of Tabasco.
Recommendations:
• The small miniature bottles of Tabasco do not have on them the date of production and expiry.

Johann D’souza Page 12 of 15 Food Safety

Assignment.
 • The small miniature bottles come in a cardboard box which packs 100 bottles in a pack. Now this box
has on it the date of production and expiry. Since de-boxing is a hygiene policy to prevent pests from
entering into a premises that could have been in the cardboard. This outer box is discarded.
• It is recommended that the date of production and expiry from this box is written / mentioned / stuck on
the polycarbonate container in which these miniature bottles are transferred to and stored in. This shall
ensure stock rotation and FIFO.
• For items from another box or another batch, they need to be placed in a separate container with the
details of the production and expiry on them.

4. Finding: The infrared and probe thermometer being used by the receiving clerk was found to be having a 4
Deg C Variance. This is huge especially when receiving chilled products. No Calibration was done of this
thermometer. There was no additional thermometer for the receiving clerk.
Recommendations:
• A second infrared and probe thermometer should be purchased with immediate effect.
• All Equipment calibration of thermometer should be done; the thermometer should be calibrated
according to international standards.

5. Finding: Temperature of cooked rice in hot holding was 41.5 c. in Kitchen. Food was kept at ambient
temperature ready to be transported to another venue (out of the Hotel).This food was kept out for 45
minutes at ambient room temperature and was to be placed in a hot box to be maintained at a temperature of
above 65 Deg C and then reheated to a internal temperature of 82 Deg C before service. The Hot boxes are
few and hence it could not be placed immediately. The HACCP Manual did not state how long food could
be kept out at ambient temperature.
Recommendations:
• The HACCP Manual requires to be updated and it should be mentioned that food that is cooked could
be kept at ambient temperature for a maximum period of 90 minutes.
• Additional Hot Boxes required to be purchased to ensure that all food that is cooked and to be hot held
could be placed in hot boxes immediately.

6. Findings: The Hotel has a vegetable washing and sanitizing room located near the receiving area. The
unwashed and dirty vegetables that are received in their polycarbonate containers from the suppliers are
placed in a designated area. Batch by batch the fruits and vegetables are washed and sanitized and then
placed in a color coded green hotel containers. The cold kitchen to which these are being transported too is
located on the 4th floor. These containers pass through the receiving area and the designated area where the
dirty unwashed fruits and vegetables are placed. This could result in cross contamination as the Cleaned
Vegetables were going to the Kitchen without being covered with Cling Film.
Recommendation:
• The HACCP Manual requires to be updated and it should be mentioned that the cleaned and sanitized
fruits and vegetables that are placed in the Hotels clean Green Color Coded Fruits and Vegetables
Containers require to be wrapped with cling film before being transported out of the vegetable washing
room to prevent cross contamination.
• Staff requires training on this procedure and monitored.

How Will I communicate the findings to the staff?

To be successful and to ensure that the incident is not repeated again, the organization will require
communicating its policies and objectives to all levels of management and staff. Only through communication
the desired levels of cleanliness and sanitization standards shall be achievable. Failure to communicate the
Hotels Hygiene Program policies, will lead to inefficiency and ineffectiveness in implementing the Food
Hygiene Program policies culture.
The Food Hygiene Program policies are aimed at to provide Hotel with the guidance for implementation,
monitoring and reinforcement of food safety in the day-to-day operation. Furthermore, it is an important tool to
implement the Food Hygiene Management System culture.

The organization communicates food safety information with personnel through both informal and formal
communication channels, such as:
• Regular management meetings
• Notice boards and posters
• Training and workshops
• Communication sheets or logbooks

Johann D’souza Page 13 of 15 Food Safety

Assignment.
• Communication meetings between Events, Culinary, Food & Beverage, stores, purchasing, stewarding
departments
• Emails between concerned parties
• Snapshots sent to all staff by the Communication department
• Management reviews

1. Cleanliness Posters: The following posters shall be required to be stuck on the walls, the posters should be
laminated stuck with double sided tape, easily washable or should be put in frames which are washable and
easy to clean and maintain. some examples of posters are as follows:
• Clean as You Go.
• Wash your hands.
• Pot Wash Station
• Dish wash Station.
• Chemical Stores Only.
• Do Not Mix Cleaning Chemicals.
• Cleaning instructions on cleaning Meat Slicers, Deep Fat Fryers, and Ovens.
• Cleaning Schedule and Checklist.
• Cleaning Posters showing the Kitchen Layout with Chemicals and Cleaning Equipment Required
to be cleaned.
2. Pocket Cleaning Guide: This is a small pocket size booklet that easily fits into ones pockets. This is part of
the uniform the stewarding team members. The guide contains the list of cleaning chemicals used,
precautions to be taken while using them, safety tips for their usage, Various Equipments are mentioned and
standard operating procedures on how to clean them is written given complete information on who is to
clean them, when it is to be cleaned, frequency of cleaning, how to clean , what is used to clean them,
monitoring and record keeping of the cleanliness.
3. Briefings: Stewarding, Culinary and Food and Beverage service must emphasize on cleanliness and
sanitization topics and mention about the standards of cleanliness in their sections, the supervisor on duty
must allocate staff and ensure that their area is maintained in a clean, hygienic manner at all given times.
Stewarding should include a 5 minute training program in their daily shift briefings focusing on various
cleaning equipment and how to clean them. Audit results, supervisory or managerial comments on cleaning
and sanitization need to be communicated to employees through briefings and departmental communication
books.
4. Hygiene Bulleting Board should be placed in the staff cafeteria, Staff Locker Room and Other Prominent
Areas where all Food Handlers could read them. The bulleting Board should contain the following
information: The minutes of the Hygiene Committee Meeting, Audit Scores and Audit Reports. Thus
creating awareness on cleanliness and sanitization and the Hotels Official stance on cleanliness.
5. Cleanliness Monitoring & Recording: Cleaning Schedules should be in place in which the stewarding
shifts supervisors recording and monitoring all cleaning activities. One of the major daily job tasks for the
Chief Steward and executive Chef is to walk around the food preparation areas and check the levels of
cleanliness. They should have hand held PDA’s where in they could do daily audits on cleanliness, this is
then automatically recorded in the computer and reports are generated with to do actions for the stewarding
supervisors. Computer linked PDA’s go a long way in providing corrective actions that are required to be
taken to rectify issues, provide dates of audits, auditor names, audit findings and emails could be send to all
members required to ensure that the cleaning and sanitization programs are functioning smoothly. Since this
computer generated reports and electronically saved they cannot be tampered with and reports for various
areas could be viewed by all levels of management who have access to a computer.
6. Area Cleanliness Monitoring Logs: Each and Every Area should have a Area Cleanliness Rating and
Comment Log Book, This log book should be filled by the Chefs and the Food and Beverage Restaurant
staff where in the rate the cleanliness and sanitization of the various premises and also put in their remarks.
This record form should be read by the stewarding supervisor daily. In this way the persons working in that
area also take active interest in ensuring that the stewarding department maintains their area clean and
sanitized and this pushes the stewarding department to also clean the premises and is actually a quality
improvement tool.
7. Bonus linked to cleanliness results: Audit results, corrective actions taken, audit scores shall all have a
bearing on individual and departmental performance monitors and shall affect bonus paid to them. Good
Audit results ensure the departmental employees receive the bonus, poor audit results in lower bonus paid
to the employees. Employees not meeting the regular set targets on cleanliness will have disciplinary
actions taken against them and this could also cost them their jobs due to poor performance and failure to
maintain and adhere to the required set standards. Staff to be communicated about this during their

Johann D’souza Page 14 of 15 Food Safety

Assignment.
 orientation and induction process also during departmental briefings and when they are under going a
performance review.
8. Trainings :
Food Handlers to attend the following trainings:
• Rank and file grades:
 Basic Food Hygiene.
 HACCP Awareness.
 Cleaning and Sanitization Trainings.
 Chemical Trainings.
 Hotel Food Hygiene Polices Trainings.
 Staff to be trained on How to use the various tools provided by management for reporting issues
relating to non compliances or lapses in cleaning and sanitization.
• Supervisory staff to be trained on:
 Intermediate Food Hygiene Training
 HACCP Awareness.
 Cleaning and Sanitization Trainings.
 Chemical Trainings.
 Hotel Food Hygiene Polices Trainings.
 Supervisory Skills.
• Management and Hygiene Committee Members need to be trained on:
 Advance Food Hygiene.
 Intermediate HACCP Training.
 How to conduct Internal Audits on Cleaning and Sanitization.
 Cleaning and Sanitization Trainings.
 Chemical Trainings.
 Hotel Food Hygiene Polices Trainings

In order to maintain the effectiveness of Hotel Food Hygiene Program, the organization will ensure that the food
safety team is informed in a timely manner of changes, including but not limited to the following
• Cleaning equipment, Cleaning Chemical and Cleaning Techniques.
• Production premises, location of equipment, surrounding environment;
• Cleaning and sanitation programmes;
• Personnel qualification levels and/or allocation of responsibilities and authorizations;
• Statutory and regulatory requirements;
• Knowledge regarding food safety hazards and control measures;
• Customer, sector and other requirements that the organization observes;
• Complaints indicating food safety hazards associated due to failures in cleaning and sanitization.
• Other conditions that have an impact on food safety.

References:
• Dubai Municipality Administrative Order No 20, 1992.
• Dubai Municipality HACCP Guidelines & Requirements for Retail operators 2005.
• The Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995
• Food Standards Agency (FSA) website.

Johann D’souza Page 15 of 15 Food Safety

Assignment.