Kynusha University Psychological Research 2001, Vol2, 139-167 (HA, HAS, PHASHSI EldtIY? FAME O DA ELT BR A ANA Am DNR FE ANS ee Rie eRe ‘What do the words “amae,” “amaeru,” and “amaesaseru” imply to lay people? —Content analysis of their descriptions ‘Yuta Takamatsu (Graduate school of human-environment studies, Kyushu university) Kazuo Kato (Faculty of human-environment studies, Kyushu university) This study was conducted to investigate what layperson’s concepts of “amae,” “amaeru,” and “amaesas fru." 105 persons (30 males and 75 females, M=27,7, $=14.0) were asked to describe in the open-ended format ‘what these concepts imply to them. Main findings were as follows: (a)In layperson's concepts of “amae,” the frequently described categories are “laziness” (16.5%), “having someone do what one doesnt want to (12.6%). In layperson’s concepts of “‘amaeru,” saseru,” the frequently described categories are psychological supports” (12.6%). Keywords: Pac ed HAUL, RACH TRE RUT CE OTE VERERAORRTH), CNETH( OMRBOM DEKOTR TVS (CLM, 1971: AH, 1972; HE 3%, 1974; Morshbach & Tyler, 1986 ; Markus & Kitayama, 1991; F#, 1993; Kato, 1995). Ef: [HAJ GE, DRMEIL BUC, HARSH ORR, LIB #e. LECH OME PFE EMT OIA 20, RMRSE EMTE TOS (of. LF, 1960, 1968, #5, 1982 FAK, 1993; ‘rfc, 1988, 1989, 1999; TBI, 1999; 4, 1997). FCTRY, DEES OHMABL SMC HEE Mal MAS) MHASH) SEOE IRATE TPR 2. Table 1 8, 5 OMS E FED KOOTHS, ENENOMEMEl, KE CHTH DONA SERS. EF—-TAB, BADR, WS, MAREE, MANOR ERE NTHOD ChB. AAA (1956, 1967) Id, PA) ASI ERIS RD RR, Fb MERRIER T HEEL. TOR, EM (1981) 1S, PHA) AMEE DREN ORRERT ALL THB EBA Le WA HHA THS) EVSME, EF TAL RESATTH (MAK, CRENLUMES, REI CES OME) HL COSA, HARCOLIIE the frequently described catogores are (16.5%), “having someone do what one doesnt want to” (12.6%) “granting whatever a person wishes” (202%), “giving “acting selfish’ (b)In layperson's concepts of “amae- culture, amae, attachment, layperson's concept, content analysis, WEE RATMETEE (, TORMOMIED DI EORLTOSE SNS, Eh, CORLERGS AM SEROMA, LEEFOBOLMFEI SoTL PURI ONTHD, EF, LOMA BARAK HUGO, AEHMEIRERTIANTRLE EV3 MM (Okonogi, 1992) &, Fb) ORMPHEE Sy POHL AWE) MRR (WO, 1999) HB. Eh, IRERORIEN DOT, RENAL OM 2 (RH, 1974), APERGARTRLOEVIG R (FAR, 1993), MISE (LILI, 1999) 48 2. OH OWBIL, [HA] €HOBOI inary YOUMERLBEOTHS. HK (1988) Uk, LO THA] A WAM OMIA RERRIC ME SSC 0 HF HORROR ROMMEL ESC GS [HA] AHS BOTT a= a YOUHEML TOR EMM L Re ELT, WH (1988) 14, HHA) EU, PEL OMKO BE, EMOM ANT DRREBA SE MRAGT TRACER LEMONY, FRETHVILETES ECHSELK. COWOMSMET, bit (1969) a8, Tew eoMMeS [TA] El, BROKE 2, BIMEORO TH 2 LOMRL EOMEOMRE ECMENO (reciprocal) HARMMATHS) EL Th. LOL, 55 LATEROIEE ALU, Kato (1995) At HABL TOS LI, EOS < seo» ALAR OOREREI160) AMAEOREMR 2% 2001 Table 1 PMPRKSLS, [HAL HAS) [ASUS ) ME A. SPIRO BAS, (HA), (HAS) Ett? 1, BADER, BSE, HF (ine) AFR « — 6 EKO SAK(LM, 1956, 1967) EC OWAAORDER TROON (LE, 1988) (RH) DASHON THEREBY AN THLE I MG BD HOMADODAN TEER, ALM EIR, MANOR REBHT OBI DRILL Tb 435 £99 MEF (Okonogi, 1992) QAFOM) OWRPRELARCE > TRIBE EDC IL KON LAE SM (UO, 1999). QRECBS RAVE IME, MM SUSAR SRR CLE, 1965) 1 AWRS) BRVAN GNSS LU) SHOEI, MBO AS TH CEE AR (+ HAE, 1974) ORAPHA COE VOTSORFERUAN TRUE IMR(FM, 1986), MB (WO, 1999) LHF 5 tS DORIROTR— hERSCOLLBWELT, AROLT SHORE HOME A DORMS AMR ANT SE BVERD RIES D GELS OO (UE, 1999). 2. HBMOIS aL y—-Yar ota ORE LORRHERING, SKUMFEMSELUMES ESD, MECMPRAERT =e THAD UMMM SRO MORES 0, WHER (LIE, 1971; the, 1988) MIB Se MEADE EES, MEER DMS ES (HTK, 1988 518 ‘F, 1999) AROMA, MMI MEOKU CH SL OMEL OMPOMEE SOMATA EHH VisstA, 1969, Maruta, 1992) OMEDRH EHBT SCE CRG EMM EE DITCH, SOAR T CREED I MERT (WE, 1982) OWE EAL TAR ORROMEPMBORRE PS TE (LM, 1965) QRFOMEDLE, HHI, MIR TEAD TATE CLE LEM ORY, BTNETHOS eeTSECE Bb) £3 2AOMBOY ERED, OADM MPO ARE ES, MK ZOMMARCEPREL ELL EMORY, STRETRVILETSLE HK, 1988,1989,1999) B. DBAS, HARES) C1? + KEKOKMBMD EW 1, ADRK ABO [HA] OMRE MICRA LSC E UM - HH, 1974) 2. HAMMER AOTO+ A DARK ERS DICT SSE (B+ HH, 1974; Kato, 1995) QREOMU MD EMT E (UR - HB, 1974; Kato, 1995) OMFG OS ERT SEE (+ RH, 1974 | Kato, 1995)POS ae Ta) HRS) PRES] ETO? 161 BESWTRENLGOTHS, SOI, AAP HALO CHD BME 60TH BOM, TE bb [HA] ORNMSAT OTR ED I LOLOD SLOMAN - OMI BAR LATTE A vs GGA + A, 1982 ; Kato, 1995), TOA, [HAI ORRITENS MB, TOWOMDAKE O KiB PERO DRA CH Y (ill, 1998, 1999), FH Al MST ETA EN TOS Csibok, 1968; tH, 1988). EA, LE (1971) 12, PAPAL MAA, BL AACS ARTIC OU LMS TOSITE TH FO) MEET COSA, RIEL THY THA 3 the ABATE 5 LMIMEME 2, AAI A OM HORE ADL TOS, TOR EMEE FIVAF SET [TR OMMMBE EO EG EOTHAPEMMIET Bo EO, NEAR OMSMEL OME HRITS. EL, NF TOM mimic, [HA & MAS) MEME NSIE AC RELTHUONTE TOS. LOL, PHA IE BBCHY (HAD) AWBBCHS EVI BVOH MELLIN 2 HELLA SOTEOKG bw CHATS. RAR Kato (1995) tk, AMMBHL OH ARMET SE LT CHA F7Bb RII NT NMR FLEE REN, EAPBEOHA TH - RES LUE OR (Bal - HO) TMBTSESLE. BOE E ORE EERO MBIA ROT 2 TRMILERAT EDBROHT, Kato (1995, Study 1, Analysis), LBOWAO AOECH LCORME OS, HA) OR HRSORMEBS Bot. TOM, DHAPHLDS DeveenemReninl, Otre [HAL E- PIETRO £3 DNA MECHA [EE EMMHRT SET [A] MEOHREMI EI Elite FORO, WR (BREE 100%, 25 5M) CHALE IVI SEM, EKHABERE DTECEM) Eh [EMIMHELOLS rj OW TEMAS b Ete FOR, WRB (HA! LOT (AHA A, BTA SRS ACH) DAL BOMHMOILa=4-Yavcth).® HATO MIS BICMET S, FARMERS, HR PERS, BESS, FUMFIS BCEREF SIE Loc, MRA E CIARA HEO-KBORVERMI SCE THY, OA st ABER, BURVANTCNSHDI, ELBE ANBREEEOI MEE H, OHLCHLOS EDERLORDER (HEELRED), BOT AONB OLENORBEBA LV LITER 6, AFF BOT, MIR, WEEE SIL 2D, AFARORME AB TSSIL (BVPLS £, AREHOSE) ABUKTHS ERATOR (Kato, 1995, pp.73-74) 0 LAL Kato ORTH, THA) E (Ae) BART CHERRIES ERO COLIC, BMA (MEE! & ORRERML AAS [HA] LOWTOSA SHML AMENDS, TebSMRAUMTTSRSELT (RE) ERIE PKEAS, ENEOMRTHRITS [HA] SOM RCHRERRIE LAMY LAGH. t Or THAL id, RMB BRTRA ONT BRETH SU MEND SI bd PdDOT, [KH! E ORREBMLTVSELAAIAMYMENTLED TORE HEM So “Fi, Kato OHS [HA] OP E DARA JORATHEEVI SEMIS MM Bites LTB Sut, [haa ) MMIC. HAS!) CB DEMMZOGHODECHS DG LEB. LILES HETHMETH, (HASHS) CMTSELED OOINTEA LE, MORPHS, MS (1974) O— MEOPORRCHS. HSOLSE [HRSUS] E 1d, BOMLTRLNCG LOL TRUM ORE LEME CHTCES, EHO A OMRe IRON See SEER. ED AURHICIE, AMBRE HHS HTS SERBFOMOUALERT SE, HELBVOBE WETSOEEL TVS. EL Kato (1995, Study 1+ A nalysis2) (4, 2H AOA «BURGER 2 5H Effie TSH, [HA] OHA SCSMIRZT AY PRT SAFI ik, MOOLOE DEY ABLL EOOMGSNTHOS, LOL, ELT HASHSS ORMRSTEO LONG ENTHADUTIEM. EF CCKMET [HA SHS) ORMMSCOMTOD DETMEE TI. RAMS EART ST LORR THA) CML TLRS COS US OURie at Be SRAM ERTS EDT, KAMGEMRTS LOK PEL IACOKA IH. BBLS, ROIOBH DOEAMEOPMERTH SEER TOS. BO OBL, RNASEMRT SCE, LC RMICE SOHNE LL EFEOLEL LOS CHRO, CM WEMG MTR LMM SHS THS (Feb & Russell, 1991; Kato, 1995). HUAIL [8 (love) ] FFL BWR, LESEMEC AVF 1 oe RIER LUMSDEN LT, MALERP KES AOE REMTTOSOEMASHILSNTUS (Fehr, 1994; Fehr & Russell, 1991) #12 RRM BVT, WB OMMTT LCLMBI DASMMRERS CLRTAS io AMIS, CREASE 52 BAEC RIL182 DMAP 2 2001 Table 2 (Hal :Oeem2 goLboa-K 1. MARR (20) 1 AGMVI LEN, &TET SRS (7) 2 AMBBL TC NSLS DCU HS + BOG) [CONEADEML TC MSHI) Eb [LOABLEFERIANTCRERS 3) EWS MRE ROME (A) PONG OUIREASLAD| LBLBCE LD) 3. EMU IST SMFS OMT E (2) 4, Dore HERI (6) 2, BBBOAS a=7-YarottA(6l) 1, BHT HST E (16) Whe SEE LVS EEMTT, RENNER EI ETSLE 6) LePEOeOS E ERELEFSC EB) BUEN, SRO TECE LB) OHS (2) BiBT Se (2) 2 ARM LAWTE TRUNIEACMS EE (10) EP-ACTEBIETEAMSS E (6) + ALBs THEY OSE (2) LBNL AICARS & & (2) 3. AGMRETSZEC) AROKLEAHEL I, DOE LOBE ACHES CE (5) BROMO E SARS LEUMDE ACES CE (3) A AIMS EE OE.2% 5. DMEEERS - bo ECRSMITE(S) + bAEECMRSBI CEG) + DAEEEEIZEO) 6. AK MAT SE (A) 7. APSRMERUEDETSZE() SHEEMo TOS OLD, mbUits THHFZEL) + ABOMSORAEGMCHA THE ITE(2) 8 -ATTSRUTE RMSE (2) 9, [MELDAEMS CEB) EICRADTE (2) 10, BAOBBHERY THO TES 2A, MAEMUTHSIZE (2) MW, BHHIZED 3. MA RPA(10) 1, DEAOR MA PHAMM IB E(B) ARMS & (6) BR ORW? APOUIIMRETH CE (2) 2, HEM RUT THEE (2) 20.6% 7.2% 6.2% 41% 2.1% 21% 5.2% 62.9% 16.5% 66.2% 33.1% 33.1% 22.1% 221% 7.8% 66.2% 22.1% 22.1% 8.2% 55.2% 33.1% 5.2% 38.1% 22.1% 41% 4.1% 22.1% 22.1% 2.1% 21% 21% 21% 10.3% 8.2% 66.2% 22.1% 2.1% HE BBSM, 7H HMI KMH) ; 7 THORP, MOLY F~ YG), DEBRSKE BUS ESEROMT eet; mE OL