Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Certainly the need is broad. We know that cities accommodate • from utilities tracking costs alone to utilities evaluating the
half the world’s population, yet water security is not assured full value of benefits to the community, economy, and
for billions of people. Pollution limits water supply for potable the environment
purposes and is the vector for avoidable disease and death.
The cost of traditional infrastructure is priced out of reach for • from building prototype projects to redirecting existing
most of the world’s people. Climate change impacts cities with flows of capital so that we routinely create this new
droughts, floods, and sea level rise. The uncertainty of climate paradigm, this new normal
change challenges the design reliability of the systems already
in place. • from a business-as-usual toolkit to an expanded toolkit of
options for our water and urban infrastructure that includes
Cities of the future is exploring a new emerging paradigm that the latest high-tech options, the latest low-tech and the
provides a frame for understanding how cities respond to a latest natural systems strategies, too
range of infrastructure needs. Recently, the wrap-up of a Cities
of the Future conference in Boston underscored that we are in • from institutions and regulations that block innovation to
a time of transition. This transition reflects a new framework for new generations of regulators and government entities that
how we think about the services we expect from encourage innovation
urban infrastructure:
• from elected officials accepting the status quo to elected
• from water and wastewater systems designed using leaders insisting on integrated solutions.
historical rainfall records to a range of multiple and
overlapping techniques that create urban resilience and In truth, these transitions are still the exception – not the rule.
better accommodate the uncertainty around Most governments and utilities struggle to maintain their current
climate change infrastructure systems. They don’t have the expertise or time
or resources to study a new way of doing business. And most
• from a linear approach for water systems where discrete consulting companies realize that they have to serve the market
systems are deployed to collect water, treat water, use that exists, not markets that may or may not be on the horizon.
water, and get rid of water to a more restorative and Most universities teach the same curriculum they have taught
regenerative approach where integrated systems provide for decades and that match accreditation standards. Most
water, energy, and resource recovery linked with land use government regulators are satisfied to enforce the laws they
design, regulation, and community health already have on the books rather than make changes that
might create problems they can’t predict.