Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………. 3
Statement of Need……………………………………………………………………… 3
Barriers……………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
Information/Behavioral Barriers………………………………………………… 5
Financial Barriers……………………………………………………………………….. 6
Transactional Barriers……………………………………………………………….. 7
Neighborhood Energy Savers: A sustainable model………………… 8
Our Partners………………………………………………………………………………. 9
Target Market……………………………………………………………………………. 10
External Factors……………………………………………………………………….. 10
Pilot implementation steps………………………………………………………. 11
Workforce Development and labor standards………………………… 16
Apprenticeship Services………………………………………………………….. 16
The Weatherization Technician……………………………………………….. 16
Solar Installers…………………………………………………………………………. 17
HVAC/Sheet Metal Technician…………………………………………………. 17
Raising the bar on wage and benefits…………………………………….. 17
Pilot implementation chart……………………………………………………….. 18
Personnel functions and key staff…………………………………………… 19
Funding Request………………………………………………………………………. 21
Revenue Sources for financial stability……………………………………. 21
Summary: NES Projections…………………………………………………….. 23
Program Design and Evaluation: Logic Model………………………… 25
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
The idea of making her home energy efficient had been on her mind ever
since she moved in and started paying her utility bills. Then, she heard that
improving her home helped address global warming. For several years this
idea had been on her mind but her family never seemed to have the extra
money. She didn’t know of anyone who had installed energy efficiency
improvements in his or her home. Plus, Sarah didn’t know whom to trust.
How would she proceed and with what money? What if she borrowed money
and it didn’t improve her home’s energy efficiency? Sarah also worried about
living with the mess created during the upgrade. Finally, there were the
questions of whether her husband would be transferred and whether they
would outgrow the house.
partners, funds from the contractors would be set aside to work on projects
chosen by Sarah and her neighbors
She soon received a visit from her neighbors who reviewed her utility bills.
They gave her a square foot score. Sarah learned that she would benefit
from a professional audit, which would give her a lot of detail on her home’s
specific performance and needs. Sarah received tips and free energy-saving
products, some of which were immediately installed. The decision to move
forward with the energy-saving improvements was clear to Sarah after she
heard that she could have a project advocate oversee her project, could be
100 percent financed, and that benefits from the program transferred to the
next owner. This was just what she needed! Sarah was excited to hear that
her home was a good candidate for solar. She invited the solar assessor to
provide a detailed review of her options.
It was during this meeting that Sarah learned she could participate with
others in a bulk solar purchase and installation bundle, thereby saving
money.
Best of all, Sarah loved the fact that her kids were turning everything off
without asking while turning up the air conditioner so there would be more
money available for the kids fund in the neighborhood.
We invite you to read more details in the following proposal about how
Neighborhood Energy Savers will unfold.
INTRODUCTION
Neighborhood Energy Savers is
a project of Tri Local Returns
which is a program of Wisconsin
Partners for Sustainability
(WISCPSA) to reduce home
energy consumption and
expenditures and carbon
emissions, and increase local
savings and jobs. Neighborhood
Energy Savers is designed as a
neighborhood-based,
sustainable model for achieving
significant energy savings and
carbon reductions required to meet Wisconsin goals. This proposals describes
the statement of need; the Neighborhood Energy Savers (NES) program; and
start-up funding request.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Consumption of fossil fuels must be significantly reduced to avoid potentially
catastrophic results of climate change for future generations. Among the
most cost-effective ways to reduce fossil fuel consumption and carbon
emissions is to increase energy efficiency followed by use of renewable
energy. Energy efficiency and renewable energy can also save people money
and strengthen local economies by generating local investments, jobs and
reducing the flow of money out of communities.
In response to this need, public policy is setting ambitious goals for energy
conservation. The Governor’s Task Force on Global Warming released its final
report on July 2008, Wisconsin’s Strategy for Reducing Global Warming. The
Report concludes that substantial reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions are needed to avert the worst consequences of climate change. It
establishes statewide GHG reduction goals of:
• A return to 2005 levels no later than 2014
• A 22% reduction from 2005 levels by 2022
• A 75% reduction from 2005 levels by 2050
The Report recommends an Enhanced Conservation and Energy Efficiency
(ECEE) Program. The goal of ECEE is to achieve annual 2.0 % reduction of
the electric load and an annual 1.0% reduction (consistent with the Midwest
Governor’s agreement) to the natural gas load by 2015 after a ramp-up
period. Currently Focus on Energy achieves appropriately a 0.4 - 0.5%
annual reduction in electric usage and a 0.3% annual reduction in natural gas
usage. Thus the energy saving goal is three to four times current levels.
Achieving energy efficiency and renewable power generation of this
magnitude will require major improvements in our existing building stock.
Buildings consume about 40 percent of all U.S. energy.
3
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Figure 1
Source: Home Energy Calculator (sponsored by US DOE, EPA, HUD, the California Air
Resources Board, the California Energy Commission's Public Interest Energy
Research (PIER) program, and Touchstone Electric Cooperatives.)
BARRIERS
Many property owners make investments to improve their home energy
performance. Current levels of investments, however, are insufficient to meet
Wisconsin’s carbon reduction goals. Residents face a number of barriers to
reducing fossil fuel energy consumption.
Informational/Behavioral
Poor information (on net savings from efficiency investments, and
trustworthy people to do the work involved);
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Risk aversion and general skepticism (people are much more sensitive
to losses than gains, especially if gains require the cooperation of other
people to be realized);
Lack of interest, or competing alternative uses of capital (if you were
given $1,000 tomorrow, would you first spend it on an energy retrofit?).
Financial
Lack of capital or access to capital (capital markets for building
efficiency are not well developed)
Split incentives (you pay the energy bills but don’t own the property, or
vice versa);
Limited tenancy or ownership (why invest in your home or other
property if you may be leaving or selling before you get your money
back?);
Transactional
Fear of disruption (who wants somebody tromping through her office or
home?);
Disaggregation (highly dispersed potential energy savings, each with
negotiation costs on capture, rather than a single big opportunity);
Information/Behavioral
Barriers
Consumers lack information about
potential savings and community
and environmental benefits of
reducing fossil fuel consumption.
Given the carbon reduction
needed, informational and technical approaches alone, however, will not be
sufficient. Without behavioral changes, energy efficiencies can result in
“recapture,” whereby consumers increase consumption and maintain
spending levels. Inefficient patterns of behavior represent a large, untapped
reserve that could (according to several estimates) potentially reduce current
levels of energy consumption by 20 , and do so in ways that save money
(Gardner and Stern, 2008, Laitner et. al. 2009).
Financial Barriers
Upfront costs, split incentives and limited
tenancy prevent investments in energy savings.
What is needed to reduce or eliminate these
barriers is access to financing that is tied to the
property, and debt service payments that are
less than energy savings. Wisconsin Partners for
Sustainability program, Tri-Local Returns, will
partner with Wisconsin Business Development
Finance Corp (WBD) and Wisconsin Energy
Conservation Corporation (WECC)/Energy
Finance Solutions (EFS) other non profits and community banks and credit
unions, to establish financing mechanisms that achieve these objectives. The
financing mechanisms will include:
1
Green@Home, a program of Acterra in Palo Alto, CA identifies the following community-
based social marketing strategies:
• Easy steps
• Written commitment to change
• Baseline measurement and measurable results
• Support group for follow-up
• Visible prompts for new behaviors
• Public recognition for accomplishments
• Change norms through visible participation
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Transactional Barriers
The energy and knowledge required to seek and obtain qualified auditing and
contractual services present significant barriers to owners and tenants. NES
will reduce these barriers first with volunteer help and then with an energy
specialist. Volunteers (Energy Advocate 1) who conduct House Calls will
provide basic information to residents about energy saving potentials and
they will install immediate energy saving devices such as compact florescent
bulbs and faucet aerators. They will explain the next steps, which can include
a Home Performance Test through Focus on Energy’s Energy Star program,
or immediate actions such as installing attic insulation or air sealing.
Volunteers will inform residents about opportunities to participate in local
support groups to share and network about energy saving experiences and
opportunities.
WiscPSA’s program Tri Local Returns seek to launch the pilot NES program in
2010 and achieve financial break-even by the end of year 3 with the
following schedule.
Investments: $16,752.803
Kilowatts saved: 9,161,349
Therms saved: 284,060
Carbon (tons) reduced: 12,500
Energy savings: $1,927,961
Under this model, after three years, NES will have generated energy retrofits
in about 12 percent of the households in a neighborhood. This will be a
significant increase over the current rate of about one tenth to three tenths
of one percent.
The goal is to expand the program to serve the eight-county Madison region
and other regions of Wisconsin. 8-County Capital Region: Columbia – Dane –
Dodge – Green – Iowa – Jefferson – Rock – Sauk
TARGET MARKET
The pilot will target middle-income neighborhoods in Madison with significant
percentages of owner-occupied, single-family homes that were built before
1980. The rationale for this targeting are: 1) middle-income households feel
the cost of energy but do not qualify for income-based energy assistance
(such as LIHEAP); 2) owner-occupants pay their own bills and have direct
incentives to reduce energy costs; and 3) older homes are less energy-
efficient. Although NES will focus initial efforts on residents deemed most
likely to respond favorably to energy improvements, it will also develop and
test methods for assisting the broader residential market: rental, multi-
family, all-income levels, and newer homes (although they are better
insulated, they also tend to be larger and consume more electricity).
Following the pilot, NES will target the eight-county Madison region. The goal
is to ramp up the program to achieve significant market share of the region,
and achieve results consist with recommendations in the Governor’s Task
Force for Global Warming, over the following ten years.
EXTERNAL FACTORS
NES will operate within the
larger context of public
policies and other market
actors. Federal and state
policy and programs to
support energy efficiency
and renewable energy will
likely expand in the near
future. This is especially
true of federal programs
such as the Energy
Efficiency and Conservation
Block Grants (EECBG), and
the possible “cash for
caulkers” program. The
State of Wisconsin applied
for a Ramp up Grant for the middle class in the recent Department of Energy
Request for Proposals. If funded, the state would have funding available for
programs such as NES. The cash for caulkers program would stimulate
demand for energy retrofits by offering a 50 percent rebate, up to $12,000,
for energy retrofits. These programs will provide a much-needed boost to
energy efficiency. They may also result in near-term shortages of labor for
energy improvements.
COWS operates the Milwaukee Me2 program to generate energy savings and
jobs through community-based approaches. COWS developed a model for an
“energy efficiency (E2) coordinating entity” to act as an intermediary to
stimulate and manage the flow of money and work between customers and
providers (lenders and contractors). 2 The NES model is similar to COWS
approach in that, through partnerships with Tri Local Returns, serves as an
intermediary to facilitate demand and supply for energy improvements.
These programs compliment NES efforts. Given that the current rate of
energy retrofit is less than 0.05% and the need for acceleration is great,
there is a need for a variety of efforts and approaches. The NES model is also
unique in that it seeks to create a sustainable financing mechanism to
sustain outreach and consumer energy assistance. Given the large volume of
buildings and investment required to reach fossil fuel reduction goals, a
sustainable financing mechanism is needed.
Hire Staff
Tri Local Returns will hire the Neighborhood Development Director, Energy
Advocate 2, Program Coordinator and Office Operations Manager. Positions
will be approximately 50 percent time for pilot.
Prepare Materials
2
Seizing the Opportunity (for Climate, Jobs and Equity) in Building Energy Efficiency,
Rogers, Joel, December 2007.
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Market Program
Staff will promote NES to Madison neighborhoods. Promotion will focus on
phone calls, emails and meetings with interested neighborhood and
organizational leaders and groups. Promotional materials will emphasize
benefits of saving energy, reducing carbon emissions and building
organizational capacity.
Select
Neighborhood(s)
NES pilot is based on
servicing an area or
areas with a total of
approximately 1,000
households. Madison 90
plus neighborhoods
range in size from a few
hundred to more than
1,000 households.
Selection criteria will
include demographics,
housing unit
characteristics and
degree of interest and
organizational capacity.
Establish
Neighborhood
Program
Staff will meet with
local leaders and
residents to review
neighborhood baseline
energy consumption
and carbon emission
data, and to establish
reduction goals.
Reduction goals will be
translated into numbers
of households that
make energy
improvements, receive
Home Performance
Tests, and receive
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
House Call energy audits. The Neighborhood Coordinator will work with local
group to design strategies for outreach and promotion that employ proven
methods of community-based social marketing.
NES will help identify the number of volunteer hours required to achieve the
goals and set volunteer recruitment goals. Neighborhood meetings will be
promoted to the general public and held in locations and times convenient to
the most residents. Meeting formats will be informal, such as potlucks, to
invite participation.
3
The Green@Home House Call Training Manual will serve as resource.
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Madison Urban League will be ramping up a workforce energy services training program
which will offer support and training services to unemployed and underemployed
workers. NES can serve as an employer with the Energy Advocate 2 position as a high
level position in an Apprenticeship career ladder.
Apprenticeship Services
Individuals in Wisconsin will have an opportunity to participate in registered
apprenticeship programs and, upon completion, will receive a nationally recognized
completion certificate that confirms their status as a journey worker in the trade. It
mostly a matter of moving applicants into a support and placement structure with
employer sponsors which is the role of Madison Urban League and others. The SAGE
grant is unique to apprenticeship programs in that it has 2 million dollars available for
directly reimbursing the training and its associated costs for green economy jobs. SAGE
funds will be allocated to the Workforce Development boards. The South Central
Wisconsin Workforce Development Board would be involved in the SAGE program.
Solar Installers Currently there are over 400 students enrolled in MATC’s CERET
curriculum, many of them unemployed displaced workers. MATC will be working with
the SAGE Apprenticeship program. NES will encourage its solar contractor partners to
participate as apprentice sponsors.
NES will be working in partnership with the MADISUN program to offer homeowners
the opportunity to receive a solar assessment. NES will coordinate across the
neighborhoods and City the opportunity for homeowners to participate in a solar
purchasing aggregation structure.
YEAR
ACTIVITY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Hire Staff
Set up Organizational Systems
Establish Office, order supplies and equipment
Develop Training Program for volunteers
Write Energy Advocate Training Manual
Market program
Prepare House Call materials (forms, protocols)
Select neighborhood(s)
Meet with leadership group
Establish energy saving goals
Hold neighborhood meeting
Recruit Volunteers for 1st training
Hold Energy Advocate training
Establish Financial partnerships
Develop guarantee fund and raise capital for fund
Application forms and protocol for loan processing
Develop Website and outreach materials
Procure materials and prepare House Call kits
Test House Calls
Conduct House Calls
Develop contractor relations
Schedule Home Performance Tests
Work with residents to obtain financing
Work with residents to select and hire contractors
Gather, compile, report energy saving information
Conduct program evaluation
Page 18
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Page 19
PERSONNEL FUNCTIONS AND KEY STAFF
Larry Walker
After many years in the software engineering and information technology
businesses, Larry pursued work in the renewable energy field, specifically in
the areas of solar energy, energy efficiency. Larry has a private consulting
business Walker Energy Systems offering: Energy Audits, Solar Assessments,
Buyer’s Agent Services, Energy Strategy Consulting. Larry is the MadiSun
solar agent offering solar consultations to Madison residents on behalf of the
City of Madison.
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Chuck Learned
Chuck brings over a decade of experience as a Green Builder and has been
involved in renewable energy research and other green innovations. He has 9
years in community development as well 15 years of owning and managing a
business, developing and manufacturing products and providing training
services that serve schools and community agencies. Chuck currently is the
Director for Tri Local Returns an upstart triple bottom line economic
development enterprise.
Support Functions
Web Services – to be identified
Accounting, payroll, liability – Tri-Local Returns
Page 21
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
FUNDING REQUEST
The total modeled cost to establish a financially sustainable model for deep
energy savings and carbon reductions in the residential and neighborhood
business sector is $300,000. This assumes a start up team working in
partnership with one or more municipalities. This would likely focus on one
county such as Dane County. WiscPSA modeling suggests that funding needs
for year 1 and 2 would be:
Year 1 $170,000
Year 2 $130,000
This amount assumes the revenue streams are going to perform as modeled
and the production quotas are being met. These are untested assumptions.
Given the unknown performance a buffer needs to be built in. This is more
conservative approach and yet allows and encourages collaboration across
municipalities and provides a model for expansion into other counties.
Page 22
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Donations
Some residents who realize benefit from participation in NES may be inclined
to support the efforts through a donation. NES will be offering giveaways
with installation during house visit.
4
Based on conversation with HP professional.
Page 23
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Year
PRODUCTION 1 2 3 Total
Households 6,000 15,875 34,533 56,408
House Calls 1,125 3,342 7,415 11,882
HPTs 281 964 2,324 3,569
Energy Improvements 141 527 1,315 1,982
Loans Processed 105 395 986 1,487
Projects bid for General Contract
Services 56 263 658 977
Investments in Energy Improvements $1,406,250 $5,265,469 $13,150,298 $19,882,017
REVENUE 1 2 3
HPT Referral fees $21,094 $72,264 $174,320
Loan fees $16,875 $67,404 $173,600
HPTs $21,094 $72,264 $174,320
General Contractor fees $49,500 $244,056 $636,533
Contractor referral fees $28,125 $137,262 $289,333
Product sales/commissions $0 $11,698 $35,952
Total retail sponsorships $0 $0 $0
Donations $7,031 $20,889 $46,343
$1,530,40
TOTAL REVENUE $143,719 $625,835 2
FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS 1 2 3
Grant/Investment Funds $170,000 $130,000
$1,530,40
Revenue $143,719 $755,835 2
Expenses
Salary & Wages $170,660 $393,097 $761,691
Other Expenses $95,871 $207,792 $332,420
$1,094,11
Total Expenses $266,531 $600,889 1
EBITDA $47,184 $154,946 $436,291
Depreciation $1,575 $1,575 $1,575
Net Income (Loss) $45,609 $115,029 $434,716
Cumulative Free Cash Flow $46,630 $71,531 $86,764
Page 24
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
ASSUMPTIONS
Year
PRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS 1 2 3
Average households per neighborhood 1000
Number of neighborhood starts 6 11 22
Percent don't care/already invested 25% 25% 25%
Percent signing up for House Calls 25% 35% 35%
Percent signing up for HPTs 25% 35% 50%
Percent investing in energy improvements 50% 60% 65%
REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 1 2 3
Referral fee $75 $75 $75
Average $$ of Energy Improvement $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
% Energy Improvements using HS loan service 75% 75% 75%
HS loan fee 2% 2% 2%
Percent homes using NES HPT services 75% 75% 75%
HPT agency charge $100 $100 $100
% loan revenue realized in year loans are made 80% 80% 80%
% Energy Improvements using HS gen.
contractor 25% 50% 50%
HS General Contractor fee 11% 11% 11%
% Contractor revenue realized in year of
contracts 80% 80% 80%
% Energy Improvments capturing referral fee 60% 50% 50%
HS referral fee 5% 5% 5%
% of homes that make product purchase 0% 25% 25%
Average product purchase $100 $100 $100
Total retail sponsorships $0 $0 $0
% House Call homes that make donation 25% 25% 25%
Average donation size $25 $25 $25
Page 25
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Page 26
Neighborhood Energy Savers – Madison Pilot
Page 27