Você está na página 1de 1
{SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE ‘PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 11848 of 2009 Between: 1 Karri Sanyasi Naidu, S/o. Sanyasi, 2 Koppaka Suryanarayana, S/o. Sanyasi Naidu, 3 Kanthamreddi Nagesh, S/o. Narsimhulu, 4 Kanthamreddi Varahalamma, Wio, Thatheelu, 5 _AP. Vyavasaya Vruthidarula Union, Rep by its Secretary, P.S. Alay Kumar, Office : 6, S.B.I. Colony, Chittoor, R/o. Achayyapeta, Vetajangalapalem Branch Post Office, Kasimkota Sub-Office, Visakhapatnam District. vv» Petitioners, AND 1. Government of India, Rep by the Ministry of Rural Development Krishi Bhavan, Now Delhi - 110 001. 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, 3 Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Buchayyapeta (M), Visakhapatnam District. .-Respondents WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through his Advocate SRI KBALAGOPAL, prosentad this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the-nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the notification dated {1/1/2009 passed by the Government of India, the first respondent, U/s 6(1) of the National Rural Employment Guarantee ‘Act, 2005 is ultra vires and unconstitutional and set aisde the same. AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI KBALAGOPAL, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri ARajaSekhar Reddy Asst Solicitor General of India for the respondent No.1 and of GP for panchayat Raj for the respondents 2 & 3 directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein returnable in four weeks to show cause why this writ petition should not be admitted in the Circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed in Writ Petition, You viz ; 1 The Ministry of Rural Development Govemment of India, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. 2. Secretary, Rural Development Department,Govemment of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad, 3 Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Buchayyapeta (M), Visakhapatnam District. are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances eet out in the petition ang the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this writ petition should not be ‘The Court made the following order:-

Você também pode gostar