Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
– A Black
Book To Become A Smart Reviewer by
TigerHATS
www.tigerhats.org
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
www.tigerhats.org
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
In this book, you may find some techniques and ideas to become a
smart reviewer. Every researcher can write research article but only
few can review the article as it needs analytical thinking, creativity,
literature skill and finally research experience.
The best way of using this book is to read the whole article. After
that select one research article from IEEE, ACM or any eminent
journal and go through the whole article. Now sit back and relax to
use your reviewing skill.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 1
It seems interesting for readers.
Or, The paper is interesting and good to accept.
Or, Reasonable work and interesting and fits within the scope.
However, the paper can be enhanced by sticking with the following changes.
- A more comprehensive and clearer conclusion is expected.
- The paper can be further improved and proper analysis can be shown to prove the strength of
the approach.
- More description of the technical details will help to improve the quality.
- Improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
- Including some discussions with existing method which could prove the proposed method
effectiveness will improve the quality of the paper.
- The approach can be discussed with some other existing techniques.
- Sentences / English polishing will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the final
camera-ready version.
- The references in this manuscript are somewhat out-of-date.Include more recent researches in
this field.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Although the idea is interesting, I recommend to improvement article with some comments as
below:
- More description for experiments should be done.
- The method can be explained in a clearer way.Try to explain the theory more detailed in
discussion.
- The references in this manuscript are somewhat out-of-date.In clude more recent researches in
this field.
- The manuscript has not been carefully written.
- Some figures can not show on my computer, such as fig.2 and fig.3.
- There are many grammar mistakes as well, eg the first sentences of the fifth paragraph.
- The reason of using certain parameters in the experiments should be discussed in more details.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
-- Including some discussions with existing method which could prove the
proposed method effectiveness will improve the quality of the paper.
In conclusion, the paper is well written and its structure is well organized. Some of the works are
described in details. My recommendation is accept. But some revisions of English sentences will
improve the quality of the paper.
Final Decision: Acceptable
Review: 6
The work is solid and the paper is well written and the simulations results are good. I consider
that it is a very interesting paper and matches well to the conference session. According to these
factors, my recommendation is ACCEPT.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 8
Reasonable work and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Overall, the work proposed is useful, the paper is organized well and the presentation is clear, I
suggest that it should be accepted by the conference.
Or,
Overall, the work proposed is useful and interesting: Accept.
However, some modifications should be made to improve the paper organization, as follows:
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
-- The paper does not adhere with the standard formatting style sheet for the
proceedings.The paper uses a different template as of provided by the conference, so need
to be changed accordingly.
Review: 10
This paper is acceptable and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Or, This paper is interesting and good to accept.
However, some modifications should be made to improve the paper organization, as follows:
- More description of the technical details will help to improve the quality.
- Improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
the final paper in the final camera-ready version
- The paper can be further improved and proper analysis can be shown to prove the strength of
the approach.
- Sentences / English polishing will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the final
camera-ready version.
- The approach can be discussed with some other existing techniques.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 11
I think this paper is acceptable and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
- Improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
- More description of the technical details will help to improve the quality.
- The paper can be further improved and proper analysis can be shown to prove the strength of
the approach.
- More description of the technical details will help to improve the quality.
- Sentences / English polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the
final camera-ready version.
Review: 12
(The Abstract Theory and experiment results: partial correction requested)
There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the methods and a detailed research
results.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 14
(The Abstract Theory and experimental results: the structure portion of the request correction)
This paper is acceptable and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the methods and a detailed research
results.
- The paper can be further improved and proper analysis can be shown to prove the strength of
the approach.
- More description of the technical details will help to improve the quality.
- Improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
- The contribution of the paper can be enhanced if it would discuss the advantages of using the
proposed method.
- Sentences polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the final
camera-ready version.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 15
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 18
The quality of the paper is acceptable, and the topic is interesting and suitable for the conference.
But some revision with reviewers' comments will help to improve the quality of the paper in the
final camera ready version.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
But improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 20
The context of this paper is organized properly. The goal of this paper is clear and also the
justification of the proposed idea.
Generally well written paper, but when you submit your final version to the IEEE system, to
improve the quality of the paper, please check your sentences and / or English one more time.
In conclusion, the paper is well written and its structure is well organized. Some of the works are
described in details. My recommendation is accept. But some revisions of English sentences will
improve the quality of the paper.
However, if the following revisions are considered in the future version, the improvements could
be helpful to enhance the content of this article.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
(English and sentence at the end of this submission is to let one more reviews)
When you submit your final version to the IEEE system, to improve the quality of the paper,
please check your sentences and / or English one more time.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
English and sentences polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the
final camera-ready version.
Review: 23
There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the method and a detailed experimental
result.
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
The presentation is clear and neat.
But English polishing will help to improve the quality of the final paper.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 25
This is very practical level papers about ....
More description about theoretical implication or meaning of core technologies needed ....
Review: 26
The paper is technically well written and polished, providing a detailed explication of theoretical
aspects such as conditions and theorems, and practical issues like algorithms, rules and possible
applications. I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Review: 27
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference. But more analysis in
the experimental results will improve the quality of the paper.
Some English sentences of the paper may need some revisions.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 29
The authors present a good technical paper with relevant topic and proper research methodology.
But authors are encouraged to provide more detailed comment for some sentences and figures to
improve the quality of the final version.
Review: 30
The paper is technically well written and polished, providing a detailed explication of design and
application aspects. I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Review: 31
The model proposed in the paper has merits which are worthy of being accepted for presentation
at the conference.However, the authors require including some discussion to justify the claims
made about the proposed model.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 32
(Short Abstract reinforcement required)
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference. But too short, more
extension will help to improve the quality and contribution of the paper.
Review: 33
Authors have to clarify what is the issue to address; in Introduction section, only applied method
was presented.What is the goal of the work and why is it important to achieve?
Some revision will help to improve the quality of the paper in the final camera ready version.
Review: 34
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference but need to clarify
what is goal of the paper more clearly. Authors just suggest without any result. I encourage
authors to put some advantages and analysis of the proposed methods.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 35
The paper is technically well written and polished, providing a detailed explication of theoretical
and analysis aspects. I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
But some revisions of English sentences will improve the quality of the paper.
Review: 36
Although there is a need to expand the literature review, but the recent presentation is enough for
conference publication. Overall, it is a valuable academic paper in this field.
Review: 37
The paper is very interesting and good to accept.
However, some modifications should be made to improve the paper organization, as follows:
In my opinion this paper is in the scope of the Conference, is well written (despite some minor
typos) and presented and the subject under study is interesting.Therefo re, in my opinion, this
paper should be accepted for the Conference.
Nice work and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
-- Improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve
the quality of the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
-- Please follow the format.
-- The paper does not adhere with the standard formatting style sheet for the
proceedings.The paper uses a different template as of provided by the conference, so need
to be changed accordingly.
The quality of the paper is acceptable, and the topic is interesting and suitable for the
conference.Therefore, it can be accepted for the conference. However, it is suggested that the
authors check the paper again and improve the wordings.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Review: 40
I think this paper is acceptable and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
When you submit your final version to the system, to improve the quality of the paper, please
check your sentences and / or English one more time.
Review: 41
(Just a nice phrase)
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the proposed method.
But improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
English and sentences polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the
final camera-ready version.
TigerHATS © 2009-2011