Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Al Sharpton. re
ca
Alinsky also pioneered the alliance of radicals th
with the Democratic Party, which ended two decades A
of confrontation climaxing in the convention riot
of 1968. Through Chavez, Alinsky had met Robert
Kennedy who supported his muscling of Kodak ra
executives. But the Kennedys were only one of the fo
avenues through which Alinsky organizers now made th
their way into the inner circles of the Democratic Party. th
th
In 1969, the year that publishers reissued fl
Alinsky’s first book, Reveille for Radicals, a Wellesley pr
undergraduate named Hillary Rodham submitted is
her 92-page senior thesis on Alinsky’s theories (she
interviewed him personally for the project).6 In her
conclusion Hillary compared Alinsky to Eugene as
Debs, Walt Whitman and Martin Luther King. il
A
The title of Hillary’s thesis was “There Is Only or
the Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” In this br
title she had singled out the single most important th
Alinsky contribution to the radical cause - his an
embrace of political nihilism. An SDS radical once
wrote, “The issue is never the issue. The issue is
always the revolution.” In other words the cause - m
whether inner city blacks or women - is never the 7R
pi
6 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17388372/ an
9
16 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020448830457442704163
6360388.html#
17 Lizza, op., cit.
16
on
18 http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/z-RADICAL%20
HOLOCAUST.htm
19 http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1866
20 http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7471#Poverty
22
cl
al
a
fo
ha
N
m
K
b
is
p
jo
st
o
fi
re
ru
35
ts 30 http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.
asp?id=522#Curricular_Studies
42
en of conservatives.”33
In contrast to liberals, who in Alinsky’s eyes are
al constantly tripping over their principles, the rule for
to radicals is that the ends justify the means. This was
to true for the Jacobins, for the Communists, for the
ld fascists and now for the post-Communist left. This is
ey not because radicals begin by being unethical people.
l, On the contrary, their passion for a future that is
ethically perfect is what drives their political agendas
and causes many to mistake them for idealists. But the
es very nature of this future - a world without poverty,
nd without war, without racism, and without “sexism”
g. - is so desirable, so noble, so perfect in contrast to
ng everything that exists as to justify any and every
se means to achieve it.
.
If the radicals’ utopia were actually possible, it
a would be criminal not to deceive, lie, and murder
se to advance the radical cause which is, in effect, a
ut redemption of mankind. If it were possible to provide
ns every man, woman and child on the planet with food,
’s shelter and clothing as a right, if it were possible to
k, end bigotry and human conflict, what sacrifice would
re not be worth it?
ir
ks The German philosopher Nietzsche had a phrase for
33 Reveille for Radicals, p. 21
46
es Frank Nitti.
re
at The Stalinist historian Eric Hobsbawm gave the
ng radicals’ romance an academic veneer in a book about
t. Sicilian criminals, whom he described as “primitive
g rebels,” in other words, revolutionaries avant la
ed lettre. Among the chapters of Primitive Rebels is one
an titled “Social Bandits.” In Hobsbawm’s description
en these criminals were avatars of “social justice,” their
e, activity “little more than endemic peasant protest
ou against oppression and poverty.”34 Hobsbawm
d claimed that the activity of the “mob” was “always
ir directed against the rich” (in other words okay).35
The French radical Pierre-Joseph Proudhon gave
license to radicals to steal and destroy in socialism’s
of most famous epigraph: “Property is Theft.” In reality,
rs of course, it is socialism that is theft.
ld
ed Another reason why radicals believe that their
ie goals justify criminal means and also why they can
he be relied on to lie, steal votes and justify murder
er when committed by their political friends, is because
es they are engaged in a permanent war whose goal is
ce the salvation of mankind. In this context restraint of
or means can easily seem finicky.
it
er 34 Primitive Rebels, p.5 Google edition
35 Primitive Rebels, op., cit. p. 7
48
DISCOVERTHENETWORKS.ORG
A GU ID E TO T H E POLI TI CAL LE FT
NEWSREALBLOG.COM
FRONTPAGEMAG.COM