A novel process for grinding limestone to a predetermined particle size distribution is disclosed. The process includes grinding the limestone between a pair of opposing rotating rolls having a smooth surface. Optionally, particles larger than about 14 to 16 mesh are removed, in a separator, and refed to the roll grinder.
Descrição original:
Título original
process of grinding limestone to predetermined size fraction.
A novel process for grinding limestone to a predetermined particle size distribution is disclosed. The process includes grinding the limestone between a pair of opposing rotating rolls having a smooth surface. Optionally, particles larger than about 14 to 16 mesh are removed, in a separator, and refed to the roll grinder.
Direitos autorais:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
A novel process for grinding limestone to a predetermined particle size distribution is disclosed. The process includes grinding the limestone between a pair of opposing rotating rolls having a smooth surface. Optionally, particles larger than about 14 to 16 mesh are removed, in a separator, and refed to the roll grinder.
Direitos autorais:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
{ANON AAA
. "USOOS375779A
United States Patent 9) (1) Patent Number: 5,375,779
Ephraim [45] Date of Patent: Dec. 27, 1994
[54] PROCESS FOR GRINDING LIMESTONE TO
PREDETERMINED PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
[73] Inventor: Daniel R, Ephraim, Glencoe, I
173] Assignee: Modern Process Equipment, Inc.
Chicago, 1.
[21] Appl. No: 170,150
[22] Filed: Dee. 20, 1993
[51] Int. as Bo2c 23/08,
[2] US. 241/24; 241/29
[58] Field of Search crn 241/24, 29, 158, 159
56 References Cited
US, PATENT DOCUMENTS
2.549501 4/1951 McClelland . anes
216553815 10/1953 MeClelland rapt
21925226 2/1960. Pratique wm
2,986,348 5/1961 Noll et al.
3,622,083 11/1971 Greenwald, Js
3,933,086 1/1976 Standing
437720 3/1983 Huffman
$703,897 11/1987 Beisner et al. =
4,840,315 6/1989 Rubin etal.
241/205
99/646 R
21/1012
241/29 X
241/29 X
$088,763 9/1991 Sandi J. et al 41/24
14,131 5/1992 Strasser etal. 241/29 X
5.203.512 4/1993 Ferraris etal. 21/16
FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
482748 9/1929 Germany
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Book, Proceedings of $O2 Capture Seminar “Sorbent
Options and Considerations”, at Cincinnati, Ohio, Na-
21729
tional Stone Association, Cosponsors: National Lime
Association Ohio River Valley Consortium.
Reprint, “Lime/Limestone Reagent Selection Pro-
cess”, by William S. Delis & Daniel E. Depperman, 6
ages.
Reprint “Effects of Limestone Quality on Wet Lime-
stone FGD Design and Performance”, by Chung L.
‘Yeh, Pure Air, Allentown, Pennsylvania.
Reprint, “Flue Gas Desulfurization System Design
Using Magnesium Enhanced Lime”, by Robert W.
‘Telesz Marketing Manager FGD Systems, Babcock &
Wilcox.
Reprint, “Limestone in Fgd Final Sizing By The Util
ity”, Hoosier Energy RE.C., Inc. Merom Generating,
Station by Jeff Jernberg for National Stone Association,
Primary Examiner—Timothy V. Eley
Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Dressler, Goldsmith, Shore &
Milnamow, Ltd.
67) ABSTRACT
‘A novel process for grinding limestone to 2 predeter-
mined particle size distribution is disclosed. The process
comprises feeding a feedstock of limestone to a roll
agtinder having a pair of opposing rotating rolls having
2 smooth surface, the rolls being separated by a prede-
termined nip or gap and having a predetermined cir-
cumferential velocity, and grinding the limestone be-
tween the rolls to @ particle size distribution including
particles in a range of about 759% to about 90% by
weight greater than 200 mesh to produce a limestone
product. Optionally, particles larger than about 14 to 16
mesh are removed, in a separator, and refed to the roll
grinder.
6 Claims, 2 Drawing SheetsUS, Patent Dec. 27, 1994 Sheet 1 of 2 5,375,779Sheet 2 of 2 5,375,779
Dee. 27, 1994
US. Patent
(HSAW) AZIS NASHOS SSIH3S “SN
ZA =zs|
%0
%0e
Ov
%09
%08
%001
OSL
NOILLNGIY.LSIG AZIS STOLLYVd LONGOWd SNOLSAWIT € ‘Sid5,375,779
1
PROCESS FOR GRINDING LIMESTONE TO
PREDETERMINED PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for grinding lime-
stone to a predetermined particle size distribution and
‘more particularly to a process for grinding limestone to
fa predetermined particle size distribution in a roll
grinder having smooth-surfaced rolls separated by a
predetermined nip or gap.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Limestone is 2 natural crystalline mineral, which has
as its major constituent calcium carbonate, character-
ized chemically a CaCO3. Limestone is used in many
processes including chemical manufacturing, agricul-
tural product manufacturing, and construction material
‘manufacturing. In particular, limestone is used in power
plant boilers for flue gas desulfurization or flue gas
scrubbing, which is a process for removing sulfur-based
‘compounds such as sulfur dioxide (S0,) from flue gas
prior to discharge to the atmosphere. In the most basic
exemplification of a flue gas desulfurization process,
limestone is mixed with aliquid carrier such as water to
create a srry. The slurry is then transported to a scrub-
bing tower where it is injected into and intimately
mixed with the flue gas stream which is discharged
from the boiler. The intimate mixing of the limestone
and flue gas at elevated temperatures fosters the desul-
farization or scrubbing process.
Limestone is also used as a desulfurizing or scrubbing
medium in fluidized bed combustion units. In these
units, combustion materials such as coal and the like are
fluidized and combusted in a combustion vessel by
contact with upflowing high temperature gasses. In
moder practice, limestone is mixed with the combus-
tion materials prior to feeding of the mixture into the
vessel, and the desulfurization process is effectuated in
the vessel during combustion.
‘The scrubbing or desulfurization process is a chemi-
cal reaction. Therefore, the proper stoichiometric ratio,
of limestone containing calcium carbonate to flue gas,
will produce the most efficient reaction. In order for the
desulfurization reaction to proceed efficiently and with
‘minimal waste, the limestone must be processed such as
by grinding to produce a defined particle size prior to
use. In the fluidized bed combustion process, it is of
‘utmost importance to control limestone particle size