This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
BEECHER AND ROBERT
Dr. Beecher is Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio. He is a graduate of the University of Virginia, and holds a Ph.D. degree in anthropology from Duke University. Dr. Corruccini is Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University in Carbondale. He is a graduate of the University of Colorado, and holds a Ph.D. degree in anthropology and paleontology from the University of California at Berkeley. Address: Dr. Robert M. Beecher Department of Anatomy Wright State University Medicine Dayton, OH 45435
Moderate differences in the hardness of diet are related to significant differences in maxillary width and other measures of facial size. Probably even more important is a relationship to the coordination of growth of different parts of the dentofacial complex. Muscular stimulation mediated through occlusal function seems to play a significant role in the coordinated development of facial structures.
MODERN DIET AND MALOCCLUSION
This study was supported by a Biomedical Research Support Grant from Wright State University.
The prevalence of malocclusions in an urbanized society such as the United States is so high (50%1) that one is led to suspect the involvement of environmental factors in the etiology. Non-western, hunter-gatherer peoples are characterized by much lower frequencies of malocclusion." However, the transition of peoples from rural or aboriginal to urban or industrial living has been rapidly followed by an increase in the incidence of malocclusion. This increase is found whether comparing medieval Europeans to recent ones--- or nonwestern peoples to their immediate descendents living in a westernized environmen t. 2,5-15 There is a strong genetic factor in the development of occlusion. Occlusal patterns within families have been demonstrated to be heritable to some degree,16,17 and ethnic groups have been characterized by the frequencies of particular occlusal patterns.18-21 61
the experimental attempts to induce developmental change in the mammalian masticatory apparatus have used four methods': (I) forcing mouth breathing in animals. (2) bone resorption of the anterior edges of the glenoid fossa. (2) placing devices in the mouth to effect alterations in mastication. This movement resulted in short-term periodontal traumas which abated when The Angle Orthodontist . affect the developing masticatory apparatus and create variations in the occlusal phenotype.62 Beecher and Corruccini probably due to a reduction in muscle use rather than increased. and ('1) an increase in the angle formed by a line running from the condyle down the ramus with the line representing the occlusal plane. growing animals responded to this stress by skeletal adaptations. Several workers have applied stress to the masticatory apparatus or have altered occlusal relationships using appliances fastened to the teeth of rats or rhesus monkeys.5-2. or accumulation of genetic mutations. especially the physical consistency of the diet. specifically: (1) some posterior bone deposition. older animals responded with tooth movements to adjust to the new occlusal alignments.> Disrupted occlusion The prevalence of an occlusion that varies from the ideal is not the norm among mammals. mouth breathing is probably a factor in the development of human malocclusions.0 mm in order to achieve molar occlusion. we believe that environmental factors. Hiniker and RamsIjord= also found dentitional changes as teeth were forced to move to maintain occlusal relationships. A cornman habit in childhood. The rapid increase in the incidence of malocclusion (often within one generation) gives cause to look beyond genetic explanations such as relaxed selection pressures. (3) lengthened condylar neck. Schultz= documents that dental crowding is quite rare in primates} and neither any of the specimens he presents nor any of the 400 wild primate dentitions that one of us (RSC) has examined would rate a Treatment Priority Index (TPI) score higher than 2. While the younger. (3) restricting animals to calorie-deprivation diets. attributed to altered muscle tension as the mandible is held slightly depressed during respiration. Experimen Is in effects of function Apart from radical surgery. These are usually designed to force protrusion of the mandible 1. The maxillae of these animals showed reduced vertical and prognathic growth. Mouth breathing Mouth breathing has been implicated experimentally (using macaques) in the development of open bite and or an abnormally narrow maxillary dental arch. inbreeding. and (4) varying the consistency of the diet from hard to soft. abnormally-directed muscle tension. racial outcrossing.vSuch effects are common in humans.sv-" A crown on the maxillary buccal teeth of rhesus monkeys was used by MeNamara-" to force the mandibular molars to occlude slightly lower than the normal occlusal surface of the uppers. Mandibular protrusion in young animals resulted in changes in the temporomandibular joint. Using mature animals and a splint on the anterior teeth to force mandibular protrusion. Based on the available anthropological and experimental evidence. Similar differences were also found in soft-diet rats.
which is essential to resist transverse bending. which resist bite (especially incisal) reaction force. (3) had mandibles that were smaller. More recently. the soft-diet animals: (I) were slightly smaller in body mass. with condyles smaller and radiographically less dense. and COX. Attachment areas for the jawclosing muscles. the dentition migrates to accommodate. although with no significant differences in shape. Dietary consistency Although many workers have commented on the probable influence of the hardness or softness of the diet on the developing masticatory system. The authors found that their regime resulted in: (I) delayed dental development and eruption. In young animals.32 Moore. The condyles. Watt and Williams. The smaller masticatory muscles in soft-diet animals were almost certainly a result of lower work requirement in mastication. Sagne and Thilander. where muscle force is transmitted to the mandible. was less in the soft-diet animals. All mandibular structures related to chewing were affected by diet hardness. and (6) had skulls consistently smaller in mass and in linear dimensions. where toothfood-tooth contact takes place. 51 No. and (2) "greater delay in the development and growth of the jaws. there is no evidence to correlate this deficiency with the occlusal problems found in so many urbanized peoples of the western world. While these experiments are important in assessing the response of the masticatory system to unusual mechanical stress. They . (5) had smaller masseter and temporalis muscles. maintaining them for one year on a severe calorie-deficient diet. in older animals.Diet Consistency jOcclusal the teeth adapted and once again occluded adequately. were smaller. Even buccolingual thickness of the mandible. which responded with less deposition and growth. the animals were maintained for approximately four months. they do not create conditions likely to be encountered by the developing human masticatory system. The smaller and less-active muscles applied less stress to the bones. These studies demonstrate that forced realignments of occlusal relationships and mandibular movements lead to responses by the most flexible elements of the masticatory apparatus. the growing skeletal system adjusts. especially in the mandible. Owens and Tonge= used weanling animals. were smaller. While calorie deprivation is undoubtedly a factor to consider in severely undernourished people."29 The consequences were tooth crowding and abnormal tooth-tooth contacts. When compared to the harddiet rats. Nutrition Experiments concerning the contribution of nutrition to normal occlusal development have taken the form of calorie deprivation of pigs.used weanling rats divided into populations eating either pelle ted rat chow as a hard diet or crushed or water-softened chow as a soft diet. 1981 Development 63 four studies have examined this idea experimentally. Tonge and McCance. was less. before attempting to "rehabilitate" some with proper foods. Green. Wear of the molar." Barber. Vol." and Henrikson.28. (2) exhibited no molar wear.29 McCance. Beecher and Corruccini35 examined a small population of rhesus macaques which had spent a short period during adolescence on contrasting hard/soft diets. In all studies. 1 January. (4) had less width of the maxillary dental arch. Rehabilitation was only partiall y successful.
Projection of indiThe Angle Orthodontist found significant narrowing of the maxillary arch with no lessening in length in the soft-diet monkeys.ors (also known as directional cosines or latent vectors) summarize the multiple interplay among variables. easily breaking down into small granules. Croup 11 was fed a gruel-like porridge consisting of ground chow moistened with water. Further. acquired at 21 days of age. This correlated with the histological findings by Bouvier and Hylander-" that significantly fewer secondary Haversian systems were present in the mandibular corpus of soft-diet monkeys than in the hard-diet monkeys of the same population. 3. related to factor analysis.he correlations among the several variables. there has been no attempt to integrate these data in such a way that interactions between different parts of the growing masticatory systems could be measured. the heads were randomly numbered so that the measurer would not be aware of their group membership. resulting in a lj uantum change in the morphology of the masticatory system. Ninety animals were divided into three groups: Group I was fed pelletted rat chow (Purina Formulab). and so on. it could not be determined whether the masticatory system responded in direct proportion to differences in dietary consistency. A principal components analysis was performed on the data in order to discover t. Least-squares theory is used to rotate orthogonal axes to a position where the major axis subsumes a maximized amount of the total variance. Group II I was fed the soft diet six days. 6. incisor to distal edge of last molar. Measurements Crable I) were taken as follows: 1. Mandibular length. 4. The eigenvect. It was to fill these gaps in the experimental record that the following study was carried out. Fresh mass of the entire masseter. Maxillary arch breadth across buccal points of ?vII. After sacrifice. The three populations were maintained on their respective diets for four months. MATERIALS AND METHODS The experimental animals were Sprague-Dawley rats. with dry pellets provided every seventh day only. Animals were also examined for visible differences in tooth alignments and attritional differences between the three groups. This technique. 'While a number of measurements have been taken from animals in dietary consistency experiments. or whether no differences should be expected until a threshold in dietary consistency difference was reached. evenly divided between males and females. the same length of time used in previous experiments of this type. engendering only subtle differences in bite force. finds the major axes of the between-variable correlation matrix. with only two groups. 5. incisor to Ml. Body mass. hard and soft diet. This indicates that the "hard" diet was minimally harder . Maxillary arch length. The second axis is the axis perpendicular to the first that subsumes the largest possible amount of residual variance. We found the lab chow to be crumbly.64 Beecher and Corruccini than the gruel. Anteroposterior length of condylar articular surface. We have no way of knowing the consistency of rat diets used in earlier experiments of this type. 2.
The comparison of correlation structure can be more easily accomplished through examination of the principal components of the correlation matrix.89 3.01) lAO ( 0.. Thus the residual from Mean. In particular.43 ( 1. greater variation away [rom a major principal components axis describing general growth could be interpreted as meaning that there is poorer coordination of regional growth rates in those individuals.21' 1. Mandibular Length (mm) (mm) . Group III is slightly A much more obvious feature of difference is manifested in the COl'relation structure between measurements within samples.. indicating a greater range of sizes. and the differences are often significant. • 3-sample TABLE I and Significance of Difference Hard Mean (s. which is much more integrated with growth in the condyle and upper arch breadth in hard-diet than in soft-diet animals.Diet Consistency jOcclusal vidual cases onto the principal component axes allows interrpretation of multivariate variabilitv within samples.) 23.40) ( 0.56 ( 1. a result attributable to the small differences in dietary consistency.92 3. the maxillary breadth is markedly increased in the hard-diet reared animals (Group I)...58) ( 0.39) (11. but not significantly so. Dispersion. Vol. RESULTS Development 65 more variable than Group I in the maxillary arch measurements. All correlations are higher in the animals that had more masticatory resistance.48) Soft Mean (s.d. 51 No.88) (0.38 2. the second axis is largest among the softdiet animals..26 38.f..d. significant < . The population reared on an intermittently hard diet (Group III) is generally intermediate in the size of structures. signifying that all structures are more tightly integrated in their growth and covariation.57 4. Again.d.) 24. and functional interpretation of the morphological integration among variables.28) (or Measured Traits F 0.91 3. Group III is intermediate in standard deviation.45 8. Masseter weight (gm) .40) om AoV with 2 and 87 d.64 8.1 January. Table 3 lists key paramo eters of this analysis.. Group I is more variable than Group II in every measurement.46) ( 0.00 9.05.) ~:I.79 9.39 8. The major (coordinated growth) axis is largest in the hard-diet sample. Breakdown in growth coordination Mcxillary breadth affected most The basic descriptive statistics in Table I show the hard-diet population (Group 1) to be larger in all dimensions and disproportionately so in some. 1981 . Inversely related to this. Condyle Length Body weight (gm) .03 1. although more similar to the soft group...18 lAO Intermittent Mean (s.31 39.41) (12. Variable Maxillary Length (mm) . The strongest difference is in the growth relation of the masseter muscle.36) (9. but usually closer to Group I.44 at p (0.17) ( 0.50) (0.65) ( 0. For instance.32) (0..20) ( 0.72 1. this measurement alone shows a differentiation that is too large (relative to within-sample variation) to be reasonably ascribed to chance. Maxillary Breadth (mm) .38) ( 0.7 I 9.43 43. Table 2 indicates the pairwise correlations in the hard and soft diet groups (I and II).~6) (0. The gross differences in the growth of most structures are not very marked.
.54 0.. The Angle Orthodontist .. This phenomenon has also been noted in characters that are diminishing in size through natural selection. Masseter weight tends to be inversely correlated with maxillary breadth and condyle length on the second axis in soft animals.75· 0.... condyle length. We noticed no displaced or rotated teeth in any of the animals. the F-ratio of variation on axis two (dispersion from axis one) between soft and hard samples is 2.66 Body 0..79· 0. most chewing stress has been removed and little bite force is now called into play in the jaws of the growing child.. ~ e: 0. 0..5%.74 0..89 0. Maxillary Breadth . .60 0. IMaxillary Length .. TABLE 2 Product-moment Correlations Among Variables Within the Soft (lower triangular half of matrix) and Hard (upper triangular half) Dietary Max. No caries were observed by us in any animals..."] ""hile they noted easily observable differences in attrition between soft and hard diet groups..differentiation represented by this difference in dietary consistency. which is significantly greater than expected by random error at P 2.79· 0..85 Groups Mussel.. Perhaps a decrease in buffering among the growing components is the first step in their decrease in size.. Thus..19....... • Significantly larger Max..55 0. The correlations of variables with the axes show that the breakdown in growth coordination in soft-diet animals is especially marked in maxillary breadth. the intermittent-harddiet group (III) is intermediate when compared with Groups I and 11 but more similar to the hard-diet sample.. Condyle length alone shows a notable residual on the second axis in Group I and III.78 0.91· 0. a decrease in correlation of masticatory structures is more noteworthy than de- = '. . we could find none.. and masseter weight... Condyle Length . Body weight .H3 0...38 Attrition not affected the major growth aXIS (which could be interpreted as error in growth or variation in growth rate) is easily largest in the soft diet sample. This increased multivariate variability in soft-diet animals is all the more striking in view of the fact that they were less variable than the hardfood animals in every univariate trait..72 Condo 0. Ii Mand.....37.93· 0. Masseter weight .05.66 Beecher and Corruccini crease in size of the structures that seems to follow with a stronger dietary differentiation...71 Soft diet ~ r in hard < .L 0.. Mandibular Length . at the stage of growrh..39 diet sample at p :c . Only in the 19th and 20th centuries (il apIJcars) has food become so processed tha t for practical purposes. DISCUSSION Present-day insults to occlusion Oppenheimer" and Lavell-v document the better occlusion that existed in human populations prior to the onset of the industrial revolution..Ve examined the occlusal surfaces of the rat molars as a further test of the comparability of our hard chow and that used thirty years ago by Watt and Williams.. In all respects..83· 0.
oral habits. considerable evidence ties upper-lower correlation diminution with development of mal- TABLE 3 Eigen Values (latent roots) and Eigenvectors (latent vectors) of the Correlation Matrices in Three Dietary Groups Principal Component (coordinated Hard Soft EigenValue ('70 variance) Eigenvector correlations: Maxillary Length Maxillary Breadth Mandibular Length Condyle Length Body weight Masseter weight 4.60 (10) -0.08 -0.96 (83) 0. In particular.06 -0. the mandible may depend on muscular function to grow to average size.12 0.w Carrr" lists breakdown of synchronous growth in lower and upper jaws as a possible cause of malocclusion.Diet Consistency/Occlusal A number of other environmental factors have been suggested as influences on developing occlusion.89 0.90 0.94 0.50 (8) -0.95 4.29 0.06 -0.93 0.95 (variation in growth) Soft Intermittent 0.96 0.80 0. it clearly is not favored by many orthodontists as an explanation of the rising rate of occlusal variation in humans. 1981 . but does not give the source of the growth-correlation breakdown. posture. premature deciduous tooth loss.90 0.77 0.42-45 The growth independence of mandible and maxilla in humans has been frequently noted.14 0.51 0.23 0.59 -0. Thus. the reduction of chewing resistance and related growth stimulation provided by "civilized" man's refined diet may be the strongest causal factor in developmental malocclusions.08 0.67 (78) 0. Potter et alY demonstrate that upper and lower dental arches are under very different sorts of genetic control.97 0.41•42 Some of these may be of minimal or no importance. Tooth spacing and crowding.w Moorrees and Reed.18 -0.57 -0.16 -0.89 0.04 0.:" Maxillary growth may be under closer genetic programming. trauma.e-v Lower correlation between upper and lower teeth in maloccluded individuals (as compared with normal) has been noted by Lavelle. and independence of tooth formation. endocrine disturbance. Because of its widespread occurrence in western society. 51 No. including mouth breathing.10 Vol.68 0. disturbance of synchronous development in separately growing parts. especially of anterior teeth. experimental evidence which might weight such factors is absent. since cases of anodontia show restricted growth while cases with muscular paralysis may develop normally.82 0.79 (13) -0.41 -0.05 -0. The aging process also yields different results in upper and lower arches. 1 January. prenatal insult.91 0. Though the chewing explanation is most predictive of observed occlusal differences in the rats.80 One Principal Component Hard Two growth) Intermittent 4. as shown by the tendency of some indi- Development 67 viduals with anodontia to have average-size mandibles.17 (69) 0. hormonal intervention. follows different rates and peaks at different ages in the maxilla and mandible.73 -0.68 0.92 0. with the maxillary teeth being more conservative and controlled by a fewer number of genes." also stress the importance of high correlation between tooth and arch size to the development of good occlusion.
J. Lundstrom. L. a Melanesian group on Mailaito. 17. 1972.: Anglo-Saxon and modern British teeth. Dent. 80-93.1936. 1977. 14. Orthod. 1968.. Williams. Eur . W. 47:406-422. Dent. Goose. the inheritance of different-sized parts that must occlude is attributed to the independent segregation of disharmonious genes from disparate ancestors. 11.-A.: Bone. J. Supp. and muscle function. Orthod. 1972. The prevailing explanation for such lowering of growth correspondence has been the effect of racial admixture between populations.: Maxillary dental arch width in Chinese living in Liverpool. J. W. M. B. R.. 1943. 40 (Suppl. H. Angle Orthod. J. Basel. 36:385. J. 17:231-233. Lombardi. Anthrop.°o and Lombardi and Bailit. 60:344354. 56:117-126. Am. II. Wood.: Investigations concerning the dentitions of the Eskimos of Canada's Eastern Arctic. C. Res. Bjork. 1937. and Harvey.68 Beecher and Corruccini REFERENCES occlusion in humans. 1. Am. M. lium. teeth. H. The amount of maxillary arch narrowing and collapse can be predicted by the amount of time the animals were chewing on hard food. 1948. Takano. The Angle Orthodontist . P. A. Wise. 1961. and Wong. 13.v-se Thus. A. Alii. 8. Henrikson. Waugh.: Mal· occlusion in the Kwaio.C. 6. The ora! status of the Xavantes of Simoes Lopes.. Suensk . W.: The Downs analysis applied to three ethnic groups. Am. Niswander.. 1Dent. Washington. Dent. Chung et al.: Hered· ity and the craniofacial complex. Arch. Dent. L. J. Genet. Hunt. 22:466-467. 19. 1948. previously noted in certain groups of maloccluded humans and attributed to racial admixture. Vital and Health Statistics. Assoc. J. S. Trans. ~ 1. Res. Calci]. D. Lu. R. 15.: Malocclusion in the modern Alaskan Eskimo.. A. 1959. 47:811815. Assoc. 1951. A. 36:283·294.: An assessment of occlusion of youths 12·17 years. No. 14:34. 1976. Kraus. Assoc. W. CONCLUSION We believe our results suggest future directions for fruitful research based on the following observations. Clinch. 7. 2. W. 21 :213-220. Klatsky. 1947. Sagne. 3. B. Kargar. The unfused mandibular symphysis in the rat alters force distribution.: Eskimo and Indian field studies in Alaska and Canada. Waugh. J. E. 19:543-553. V. Res. has apparently resulted from lower chewing stress required by a soft dietary consistency. Price. Cotton. Oral Bioi. 10. J. 162.: Studies in the dietaries of contemporary primitive peoples.present convincing genetic arguments against this explanation.. IG:355-356. J.: Malocclusion and civilization. Am. 1977.: Further studies on the Xavantc Indians. B. USPHS. 23:417-437. Replication of these experiments with a laboratory animal more closely related to man in terms of both biology and masticatory system is seen as a vital future need. 5. 45: 172-207. L. L. In this animal population the disassociation in size of occlusal features during their growth.: Dental condition of two tribes of Taiwan aborigines-Ami and Atayal. L. VI!. Am. M. Am.: Influence of the diet on the jaws and the face of the American Eskimo. 5b). J. 12. C. 18. 16. Tand. D. I'. A iii. 1966. 1951. D. Mediolateral maxillary growth seems dependent upon the muscular stimulation provided by rough elements in the diet. C. 1937.. Phys. Tiss. E. 9. Res. and Thilander. and Bailit. Lavelle.: The face in profile. Kelly.1977. Soc. J.: Dental observations among the Eskimos.: The occlusion of the Australian aborigine. 24:1640· 1647. S. Dent. K. and Frei. Ortluul. Solomon Islands. Orthod. Ser. 4. and continual incisor function in rodents maintains a base level of function regardless of diet that has no parallel in man..: Tooth-Size and Occlusion in Twins. Periodont . H.
Barber. ]. S. 1969.: Tool use and crowded teeth in Australopithecinae. Methods. University of Adelaide. Craven. Master's thesis. 16:503-512..: Reply. Dent. 1975. Papua.: Craniofacial variation in a central Australian tribe. II. Orthod. J. 1'. J.-P. R. Orthod. Thoma.: Severe undernutrition in growing and adult animals. H. A. [rosthet. Nance. D. Angle Orthod. R. M.. J. J.: Problems and methods in research on the genetics of dental occlusion. 47:6577. Beecher. B. 55:71-74. 146:1-34.: Genetics of common dental disorders. 43. 39. 24:171. and Reed. 38.: Effects of the ph ysical consistency of the diet on the condylar growth of the rat mandible. New Guinea.. Development 69 26.: Variability in wild and inbred mammalian populations. 1981 . J. 24. Orthod. 23. B... M. J. R. 30. H. Dent. Am. 59:1-IR. 45. 19: 197-206. Am. R. Am. C. in press. H. R. R. L.. 28: 12·35.: Anterior displacement of the mandible in adult rhesus monkeys.. A. Weijs. 1971. Phys. J. R. 32. and Dantuma.: Cenctic and epidemiologic studies of oral characteristics in Hawaii's schoolchildren. 51 No. M. 11. G. J.: A genetic study of class III malocclusion. J. M. Charlier. Hixon. ]. Moore. V.. 28. Br.. 1976. Litton. J. W. J. and Cox.. Malocclusion. 42. Chung. Schultz.. Runck. Bilben. Evolution 19:214-233. Am. 58:565-577.. 51. D. H. W. Genet. S. C. and Hylander. 1.: Variability in characters undergoing rapid evolution.: Electromyography and mechanics of mastication in the albino rat. 1973. 43:412-421. 64: 578-606. McNamara. and McCance.. 73:895-928. Am.. J. L.. H. W. J. 1973.J. F. Independent genetic determinants. J. 47. 35. 46. A. 1966. J. 61:29-37. W. Moorrees. 63:494-508. S... Smith. 40. Guthrie. 1958. R. McCance. 1975. Anat. J. 1954. Orthod. 1966. 21. 1978. J. Res. S. and HermannStutzmann. R.: Research related to malocclusion. C. 27. Nutr. 1965. and nailit. Mourrees. S.: Masticatory function and skull growth. Burstonc. Orthod. Am.. S. 5:419-421... 1977. Gam. 36. A. J. 1973. sex differences and population comparisons. Tonge. 50. ].: Variation in the secular changes in the teeth and dental arch. Lavelle. n. Yu.. jaws. J. J. J. C. E. 12:77-88. 19:361-372. Strnad. W. J. 37. C. J. S.. Orth od. M. 44:397412.: The cause and effect of mouthbreathing as related to malocclusion.. and Corruccini.: Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations to altered function in the orofacial region. L. and teeth of pigs. Bader. 34. D. P. and McCance. Res. P.' 1.. 31. C. Petrovic. Am. T. 22:257-268. S. 1966.: Variation in dental occlusion and arches among Melanesians of Bougainville Island. Ackerman. 23: 471-495. Harvold. and Chierici. A III. Alii.. 1951.Diet Consistency jOcclusal 20. Angle Orthod. Lavelle. Nutr. Potter. Sci. Niswander.. and Weinstein.: Normal development of the jaws and teeth in pigs. Isaacson. H. 1938. 19: 14-34. and Davis. E. and the delay and malocclusions produced by calorie deficiencies. Rhinology XVI:191-196. Green. 1963. 1965. Curro Anthrop. J. J . 1.. 25.: Effects of mandibular hyperpropulsion on the prechondroblast ic zone of young rat condyle. H.. II. and Tonge. Dent. Angle Orthod. an analysis of Microtus molars. and Kau. J. Brown. P. 15. Am. W. 1971. Orthod.: Principal factors controlling development of the mandible and maxilla. 6:356357. W. 1978. E.. 42:848-851. 48. Oppenheimer. Morph. and Shapiro. 1965. Orthod.. 115: 1-22. G. N.: Research and malocclusion. 1973. L. J. 33. G. C. R. 1968. J. L. Am. Owens. Anthrop. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. 22. R. M.. 1972. C.: A radiographic cephalometric study of the central Australian Aborigine. C. and BaiIit. The effects of rehabilitation on the teeth and jaws of pigs. Am. age changes. Tonge.: Severe undernutrition in growing and adult animals. 47: 195·208. Clin. L. A. Vol. Bouvier. Florida Acad. F. Smith. Morph. B. C. Curro Anthrop. 1961. K. 29. 1. C. J. 1965.: A twin study of dental dimensions.: Primate experiments on oral sensation and dental malocclusions.. in press.. Watt. Niswander. D. 18. Phys. 49.: Effects of bone strain on cortical bone structure in macaques. 41. Am. Am. 44. R. A. 1. Phvs. The mouth. Zool. Anthrop. Anthrop. K. L. L.. Vargervik. and Ramsfjord. Br. K. Orthod.: Biometrics of crowding and spacing of teeth in the mandible. 146: 123-131. J. D. A.: The effects of the physical consistency of food on the growth and development of the mandible and maxilla of the rat. J. January. R.: Effects of dietary consistency on maxillary arch breadth in macaques. and Williams. R. Hiniker. Dent. 1956. 47:661-673. Hum. Christiansen. 1970. C.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.