Volume I
Elements of Stability Calculations
IEEEPress
445 Hoes Lane, POBox 1331
Piscataway, NJ 088551331
Editorial Board
John B. Anderson, Editor in Chief
R. S. Blicq
M.Eden
D. M. Etter
G. F. Hoffnagle
R. F. Hoyt
J. D. Irwin
S. V. Kartalopoulos
P. Laplante
A. J. Laub
M. Lightner
J. M. F. Moura
J.Peden
E. SanchezSinencio
L. Shaw
D. J. Wells
Dudley R. Kay, Director ofBook Publishing
Carrie Briggs, Administrative Assistant
Lisa S. Mizrahi, Review and Publicity Coordinator
Valerie Zaborski, Production Editor
IEEE Press Power Systems Engineering Series
Dr. Paul M. Anderson, Series Editor
. PowerMathAssociates, Inc.
Series Editorial Advisory Committee
Dr. Roy Billinton
University of Saskatchewan
Dr. Atif S. Debs
GeorgiaInstituteof Technology
Dr. M. ElHawary
TechnicalUniversity of
NovaScotia
Mr. RichardG. Farmer
ArizonaPublic
ServiceCompany
Dr. Charles A. Gross
AuburnUniversity
Dr. G. T. Heydt
PurdueUniversity
Dr. George Karady
ArizonaState University
Dr. DonaldW. Novotny
University of Wisconsin
Dr. A. G. Phadke
VirginiaPolytechnic and
State University
Dr. ChananSingh
Texas A& M University
Dr. E. KeithStanek
University of MissouriRolla
Dr. J. E. Van Ness
Northwestern University
POWER
SYSTEM
STABILITY
Volume I
Elements of Stability Calculations
Edward Wilson Kimbark
AIEEE
'VPRESS
roWILEY
\:'l9INTERSCIENCE
AJOHNWILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICAnON
IEEE Press Power Systems Engineering Series
Dr. Paul M. Anderson, Series Editor
1995 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 100172394
1948 by Edward Wilson Kimbark
This is the IEEE reprinting of a book previously published by John Wiley &
Sons, Inc. under the title Power System Stability, Volume I: Elements of
Stability Calculations.
All rights reserved. No part ofthis book may be reproduced in any form,
nor may it be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form,
without written permission from the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
ISBN 0780311353
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Kimbark, Edward Wilson
Power system stability I Edward Wilson Kimbark.
p. cm.  (IEEE Press power systems engineering series)
Originally published: New York : Wiley, 19481956.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents: v.I. Elements of stability calculations  v. 2. Power
circuit breakers and protective relays  v. 3. Synchronous
machines.
ISBN 0780311353 (set)
1. Electric power system stability. I. Title. II. Series.
TKI010.K56 1995
621.319dc20 9442999
CIP
To my wife
RUTH MERRICK KIMBARK
FOREWORD TO THE 1995 REISSUE
The IEEE Press Editorial Board for the Power Systems Engineering
Series has, for some time, discussed the possibility of reprinting clas
sic texts in power system engineering. The objective of this series is to
recognize past works that merit being remembered and to make these
older works available to a new generation of engineers. We believe
many engineers will welcome the opportunity of owning their own
copies of these classics.
In order to come to an agreement about which text to reprint, a num
ber of candidates were proposed. After a discussion, the board took a
vote. The Kimbark series was the overwhelming choice for the first
books in the IEEE Power Systems Engineering Classic Reissue Series.
The subject of power system stability has been studied and written
about for decades. It has always been a challenge for the engineer to
understand the physical description of a system described' by a huge
number of differential equations. The system modeling is central to an
understanding of these large dynamic systems. Modeling is one of the
central themes of Kimbark's Power System Stability books. His dis
cussion of the system equations remains as clear and descriptive today
as it was when first published. Many engineers have seen references to
these works, and may have had difficulty in finding copies for study.
This new printing presents a new chance for these engineers to now
have copies for personal study and reference.
Kimbark presents a method of solving the system equations that was
used in the days of the network analyzer. This method has been re
placed by digital computer techniques that provide much greater
power and speed. However, the older methods are still of historical
interest, moreover, these stepbystep methods provide a convenient
way of understanding how a large system of equations can be solved.
Edward Kimbark was noted during his long career as an excellent
writer and one who had the unique capability of explaining complex
topics in a clear and interesting manner. These three volumes under
the general title Power System Stability, Volumes I, II, and III were
originally published in the years 1948, 1950, and 1956. Kimbark's
book, Electrical Transmission of Power Signals, published in 1949,
vii
provided a general treatment of electric power networks and signal
propagation.
Kimbark studied Electrical Engineering at Northwestern University
and at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he received
the Sc.D. degree in 1937. He then began a career in teaching and re
search at the University of California, Berkeley, MIT, Polytechnic
Institute, Brooklyn, Instituto Tenologico de Aeronautica (San Jose
Campos Brazil) and, finally, as the Dean of Engineering at Seattle Uni
versity. In 1962 Kimbark joined the Bonneville Power Administration
as head of the systems analysis branch, where he remained until his re
tirement in 1976. He continued to work on special tasks at Bonneville
until his death in 1982.
Kimbark is wellknown for his excellent books and also his many
technical papers. He was formally recognized for his achievements by
being elected a Fellow in the IEEE, to membership in the National
Academy of Engineering, and was the recipient of the IEEE Harbishaw
Award. He was awarded a Distinguished Service Award and a Gold
Medal for his service to the U.S. Department of the Interior.
The IEEE Power Engineering Society is proud to present this
special reprinting of all three volumes of Power System Stability by
Edward Kimbark.
Paul M. Anderson
Series Editor, IEEE Press
Power Systems Engineering Series
viii
PREFACE
This work on powersystem stability is
intended for use by powersystem engineers and by graduate
students. It grew out of lectures given by the author in a
graduate evening course at Northwestern University during the
school year 19412.
For the convenience of the reader, the work is divided into
three volumes. Volume I covers the elements of the stability
problem, the principal factors affecting stability, the ordinary
simplified methods of making stability calculations, and illus
trations of the application of these methods in studies which
have been made on actual power systems.
Volume II covers power circuit breakers and protective
relays, including material on rapid reclosing of circuit breakers
and on the performance of protective relays during swings and
outofstep conditions. Such material belongs in a work on sta
bility because the most important means of improving the tran
sient stability of power systems in the improvement of circuit
breakers and of protective relaying. It .is expected, however,
that the publication of this material in a separate volume will
make it more useful to persons who are interested in power
system protection, even though they may not be particularly
concerned with the subject of stability.
Justification of the simplifying assumptions ordinarily used in
'stability calculations and the carrying out of calculations for the
extraordinary cases in which greater accuracy than that afforded
by the simplified methods is desired require a knowledge of the
somewhat complicated theory of synchronous machines and of
their excitation systems. This material is covered in Volume
III, which is expected to appeal to those desiring a deeper under
standing of the subject than is obtainable from Volume I alone.
ix
x PREFACE
It is my hope that this treatise will prove useful not only to
readers seeking an understanding of powersystem stability but
also to those desiring information on the followingrelated topics:
ac. calculating boards, fault studies, circuit breakers, protective
relaying, synchronousmachine theory, exciters and voltage regu
lators, and the stepbystep solution of nonlinear differential
equations.
I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to the following
persons:
To my wife, Ruth Merrick Kimbark, for typing the entire
manuscript and for her advice and inspiration.
To Charles A. Imburgia, A. J. Krupy, Harry P. St. Clair, and
especially Clement A. Streifus for supplying and interpreting
information on stability studies made on actual power systems.
To J. E. Hobson, W. A. Lewis, and E. T. B. Gross for review
ing the manuscript and for making many suggestions for its
improvement.
To engineers of the General Electric Company and of the
Westinghouse Electric Corporation for reviewing certain parts
of the manuscript pertaining to products of their companies.
To manufacturers, authors, and publishers who supplied
illustrations or gave permission for the use of material previ
ously published elsewhere. Credit for such material is given at
the place where it appears.
EnwARD WILSON KIMBARK
Evanston, Illinois
June, 1947
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
I The Stability Problem 1
II The Swing Equation and Its Solution 15
III Solution of Networks 53
IV The EqualArea Criterion for Stability 122
V Further Consideration of the TwoMachine
System 149
VI Solution of Faulted ThreePhase Networks 193
VII Typical Stability Studies 253
INDEX 349
CHAPTER I
THE STABILITY PROBLEM
Gen. tf Motor
x
.Ie
X
o
1
Definitions and illustrations of terms. Powersystem stability is a
term applied to alternatingcurrent electric power systems, denoting a
condition in which the various synchronous machines of the system
remain in synchronism, or "in step," with each other. Conversely,
instability denotes a condition involving loss of synchronism, or falling
"out of step."
Consider the very simple power system of Fig. 1, consisting of a
synchronous generator supplying power to a synchronous motor over
a circuit composed of series inductive reactance XL. Each of the
synchronous machines may be rep
resented, at least approximately, by
a constantvoltage source in series
with a constant reactance. * Thus
the generator is represented by Eo
and Xo; and the motor, by EM
and XM. Upon combining the ma
chine reactances and the line re..
actance into a, single reactance, we
have an electric circuit consisting of FI 1 S I t h
G.. Imp e wemac me power
two constantvoltage sources, Eo system.
and EM, connected through re
actance X c= XG + XL +XM. It will be shown that the power
transmitted from the generator to the motor depends upon the phase
difference 0 of the two voltages E
G
and EM. Since these voltages are
generated by the flux produced by the field windings of the machines,
their phase difference is the same as the electrical angle between the
machine rotors.
The vector diagram of voltages is shown in Fig. 2. Vectorially,
E
G
= EM+JXI [1]
(The boldface letters here and throughout the book denote com
*Either equivalent synchronous reactance or transient reactance is used, depending
upon whether steadystate or transient conditions are assumed. These terms are
defined and discussed in Chapters XII and XV, Vol. III.
1
2 THE STABILITY PROBLEM
plex, or vector, quantities). Hence the current is
I = Eo  EM
jX
[2]
[5]
[4]
[3]
The power output of the generatorand like
wise the power input of the motor, since there
jXI is no resistance in the lineis given by
P = Re(EoI)
R
(
E Eo  EM)
= e 0
FIG. 2. Vector diagram sx
of the system of Fig. 1. h R " I f 
were e means the rea part 0" and Eo
means the conjugate of Eo. Nowlet
EM = EM!!
and
Then
Eo = EolJ..
Eo = Eo/a
[6]
[7]
Substitution of eqs. 5, 6, and 7 into eq. 4 gives
(
EolJ..  EMI!J.)
P = Re Eo/a x ~
... Re(E;2 /90
0
_ Ea;M /90
0
 a)
EoEM 0
=  Xcos(90  8)
EoEM.
= ysma
[8]
This equation shows that the power P transmitted from the generator
to the motor varies with the sine of the displacement angle abetween
the two rotors, as plotted in Fig. 3. The curve is known as a power
angle curve. The maximum power that can be transmitted in the
steady state with the given reactance X and the given internal voltages
Eo and EM is
[9]
DEFINITIONS AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF TERMS 3
and occurs at a displacement angle ~ = 90. The value of maximum
power may be increased by raising either of the internal voltages or by
decreasing the circuit reactance.
The system is stable only if the displacement angle ~ is in the range
from 90 to +90, in which the slope dP/do is positive; that is, the
range in which an increase in displacement angle results in an increase
in transmitted power. Suppose that the system is operating in the
steady state at point A, Fig. 3. The mechanical input of the generator
and the mechanical output of the motor, if corrected for rotational
losses, will be equal to the electric power P. Now suppose that a
p
FIG. 3. Poweranglecurve of the system of Fig. 1.
small increment of shaft load isadded to the motor. Momentarily the
angular position of the motor with respect to the generator, and there
fore the power input to the motor, is unchanged; but the motor output
has been increased. There is, therefore, a net torque on the motor
tending to retard it, and its speed decreases temporarily. As a result
of the decrease in motor speed, 0 is increased, and consequently the
power input is increased, until finally the input and output are again in
equilibrium, and steady operation ensues at a newpoint B, higher than
A on the powerangle curve. (It has been tacitly assumed that the
generator speed would remain constant. Actually the generator may
have to slow down somewhat in order for the governor of its prime
mover to operate and increase the generator input sufficiently to
balance the increased output.)
4 THE STABILITY PROBLEM
Suppose that the motor input is increased gradually until the point
C of maximum power is reached. If now an additional increment of
load is put on the motor, the displacement angle awill increase as
before, but as it does so there will be no increase in input. Instead
there will be a decrease in input, further increasing the difference be
tween output and input, and retarding the motor more rapidly. The
motor will pull out of step and will probably stall (unless it is kept
going by inductionmotor action resulting from damper circuits which
may be present) . Pm is the steadystate stability limit of the system.
It is the maximum power that can be transmitted, and synchronism
will be lost if an attempt is made to transmit more power than this
limit.
If a large increment of load on the motor is added 8uddenly, instead
of gradually, the motor may fall out of step even though the new load
does not exceed the steadystate stability limit. The reason is as
follows: When the large increment of load is added to the motor shaft,
the mechanical power output of the motor greatly exceedsthe electrical
power input, and the deficiency of input is supplied by decrease of
kinetic energy. The motor slows down, and an increase of the dis
placement angle ~ and a consequent increase of input result. In ac
cordance with the assumption that the new load does not exceed the
steadystate stability limit, ~ increases to the proper value for steady
state operation, a value such that the motor input equals the output
and the retarding torque vanishes. When this value of 0 is reached,
however, the motor is running too slowly. Its angular momentum
prevents its speed from suddenly increasing to the normal value.
Hence it continues to run too slowly, and the displacement angle in
creases beyond the proper value. After the angle has passed this
value, the motor input exceeds the output, and the net torque is now
an accelerating torque. The speed of the motor increases and ap
proaches normal speed. Before normal speed is regained, however,
the displacement angle may have increased to such an extent that the
operating point on the powerangle curve (Fig. 3) not only goes over
the hump (point C) but also goes so far over it that the motor input
decreases to a value less than the output. If this happens, the net
torque changes from an accelerating torque to a retarding torque.
The speed, which is still belownormal, now decreases again, and con
tinues to decrease during all but a small part of each slip cycle. Syn
chronism is definitely lost. In other words, the system is unstable.
If, however, the sudden increment in load is not too great, the motor
will regain its normal speed before the displacement angle becomes too
great. Then the net torque is still an accelerating torque and causes
DEFINITIONS AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF TERMS 5
the motor speed to continue to increase and thus to become greater
than normal. The displacement angle then decreases and again ap
proaches its proper value. Again it overshoots this value on account
of inertia. The rotor of the motor thus oscillates about the new
steadystate angular position. The oscillations finally die out be..
cause of damping torques, t which have been neglected in this ele
mentary analysis. A damped oscillatory motion characterizes a
stable system.
With a given sudden increment in load, there is a definite upper
limit to the load which the motor will carry without pulling out of step.
This is the transient stability limit of the system for the given condi
tions. The transient stability limit is always below the steadystate
stability Iimit.t but, unlike the latter, it may have many different
values, depending upon the nature and magnitude of the disturbance.
The disturbance may be a sudden increase in load, as just discussed, or
it may be a sudden increase in reactance of the circuit, caused, for
example, by the disconnection of one of two or more parallel lines as a
normal switching operation. The most severe type of disturbance to
which a power system is subjected, however, is a short circuit. There
fore, the effect of short circuits (or "faults," as they are often called)
must be determined in nearly all stability studies.
A threephase short circuit on the line connecting the generator and
the motor entirely cuts off the Bow of power between the machines.
The generator output becomes zero in the purereactance circuits under
consideration; the motor input also becomes zero. Because of the
slowness of action of the governor of the prime mover driving the
generator, the mechanical power input of the generator remains con
stant for perhaps i sec. Also, since the power and torque of the load
on the motor are functions of speed, and since the speed cannot change
instantly and changes by not more than a few per cent unless and until
synchronism is lost, the mechanical power output of the motor may be
assumed constant. As the electrical power of both machines is de
creased by the short circuit, while the mechanical power of both re
mains constant, there is an accelerating torque on the generator and a
retarding torque on the motor. Consequently, the generator speeds
up, the motor slows down, and it is apparent that synchronism will be
lost unless the short circuit is quickly removed so as to restore syn..
chronizing power between the machines before they have drifted too
tDiscussed in Chapter XIV, Vol. III.
tConventional methods of calculation, however, sometimes indicate that the
transient stability limit is above the steadystate stability limit. This paradox is
discussedin Chapter XV, Vol. III.
6 THE STABILITY PROBLEM
far apart in angle and in speed. If the short circuit is on one of two
parallel lines and is not at either end of the line, or if the short circuit is
of another type than threephasethat is, onelinetoground, lineto
line, or twolinetogroundthen some synchronizing power can still
be transmitted past the fault, but the amplitude of the powerangle
curve is reduced in comparison with that of the prefault condition. In
some cases the system will be stable even with a sustained short cir
cuit, whereas in others the system will be stable only if the short cir
cuit Is cleared with sufficient rapidity. Whether the system is stable
during faults will depend not only on the system itself, but also on the
type of fault, location of fault, rapidity of clearing, and method of
clearingthat is, whether cleared by the sequential opening of two or
more breakers, or by simultaneous openingand whether or not the
faulted line is reclosed, For any constant set of these conditions, the
question of whether the system is stable depends upon howmuch power
it was carrying before the occurrence of the fault. Thus, for any
specified disturbance, there is a value of transmitted power, called the
transient stability limit, below which the system is stable and above
which it is unstable.
The stability limit is one kind of power limit, but the power limit of a
system is not always determined by the question of stability. Even
in a system consisting of a synchronous generator supplying power to a
resistance load, there is a maximum power received by the load as the
resistance of the load is varied. Clearly there is 8. power limit here
with no question of stability.
Multimachine systems. Few, if any, actual power systems consist
of merely one generator and one synchronous motor. Most power
systems have many generating stations, each with several generators,
and many loads, most of which are combinations of synchronous
motors, synchronous condensers, induction motors, lamps, heating
devices, and others. The stability problem on such a power system
usually concerns the transmission of power from one group of syn
chronous machines to another. As a rule, both groups consist pre
dominantly of generators. During disturbances the machines of each
group swing more or less together; that is, they retain approximately
their relative angular positions, although these vary greatly with
respect to the machines of the other group. For purposes of analysis
the machines of each group can be replaced by one equivalent machine.
If this is done, there is one equivalent generator and one equivalent syn
chronous motor, even though the latter often represents machines that
are actually generators.
Because of uncertainty as to which machines will swing together, or
A MECHANICAL ANALOGITE OF SYSTEM STABILITY 7
in order to improve the accuracy of prediction, it is often desirable to
represent the synchronous machines of a power system by more than
two equivalent machines. Nevertheless, qualitatively the behavior of
the machines of an actual system is usually like that of a twomachine
system. If synchronism is lost, the machines of each group stay to
gether, although they go out of step with the other group.
Because the behavior of a twomachine system represents the be
havior of a multimachine system, at least qualitatively, and because
the twomachine system is very simple in comparison with the multi
machine system which it represents, the twomachine system is ex
tremely useful in describing the general concepts of powersystem
stability and the influence of various factors upon stability. Ac
cordingly, the twomachine system plays a prominent role in this book.
A mechanical analogue of system stability.5 A simple mechanical
model of the vector diagram of Fig. 2 may be built of two pivoted rigid
arms representing the E
G
and EM
vectors, joined at their extremities
by a spring representing the XI vec
tor. (See Fig. 4.) Lengths rep
resent voltages in the model, just
as they do in the vector diagram.
The lengths of the arms, EG and
EM, are fixed in accordancewith the
ti f t t t 1 FIG. 4. A mechanical analogue of the
assump Ion 0 cons an In erna system of Fig. 1.
voltages. The length of the spring
XI is proportional to the applied tensile force (for simplicity, we
assume an ideal spring which returns to zero length if the force is
removed). Hence the tensile force can be considered to represent the
current, and the compliance of the spring (its elongation per unit force),
to represent the reactance.
The torque exerted on an arm by the spring is equal to the product of
the length of the arm, the tensile force of the spring, and the sine of the
angle between the arm and the spring. (More torque is exerted by the
spring when it is perpendicular to the arm than at any other angle for
the same tensile force.) Obviously, the torques on the two arms are
equal and opposite. The torque, multiplied by the speed of rotation,
gives the mechanical power transmitted from one arm to the other.
For convenience of inspection, the mechanical model will be regarded
as stationary, rather than as rotating at synchronous speed, just as we
regard the usual vector diagram as stationary. The formula for torque
(or power) in the model is analogous to that for power in the vector
Superior numerals refer to items in the list of References at end of chapter.
8 THE STABILITY PROBLEM
diagram, namely: voltage X current X cosine of angle between them.
(Since the XI vector is 90 ahead of the I vector, the cosine of the
angle between E and I is equal to the sine of the angle between E and
XI.)
The shaft power of the machines may be represented by applying
additional torques to the arms. A convenient method of applying
FIG. 5. A mechanical analogue of
the system of Fig. 1, suitable for
representing transient conditions.
FIG. 6. A mechanical analogue of a three
machine system consisting of generator,
synchronous condenser, and synchronous
motor.
constant equal and opposite torques to the two arms is to attach a drum
to each arm and to suspend a weight pan from a pulley hanging on a
cord, one end of which is wound on each drum, all as indicated in
Fig. 5.
Asweights are added to the pan in small increments, the two arms of
the model gradually move farther apart until the angle 0 between them
reaches 90, at which position the spring exerts maximum torque. If
further weights are added, the arms fly apart and continue to rotate in
opposite directions until all the cord is unwound from the drums. The
system is unstable. The steadystate power limit is reached at
o= 90. Although from 90 to 180 the spring force (current) con
tinues to increase, the angle between arm and spring changes in such a
way that the torque decreases.
The effect of changing the machine voltages can be shown by at
taching the spring to clamps which slide along the arms.
The effect of an intermediate synchronouscondenser station in in
BAD EFFECTS OF INSTABILITY 9
creasing the steadystate power limit can be shown by adding a third
pivoted arm attached to an intermediate point of the spring (Fig. 6).
The condenser maintains a fixed internal voltage. Since the condenser
has no shaft input or output, no drum is provided on the third arm in
the model. With the intermediate arm (representing the condenser)
in place, the angle betwe.en the two outer arms (representing the
generator and motor) may exceed 90 without instability, and the
power limit is greater than before.
The model can be used to illustrate transient stability by providing
each arm with a flywheel such that the combined moment of inertia of
the arm and flywheel is proportional to that of the corresponding syn
chronous machine together with its prime mover (or load). The
drums can be made to serve this purpose.
If not too great an increment of load is sud
denly added to the pan, it will be found that
the arms oscillate before settling down to their
new steadystate positions. The angle between
the arms may exceed 90 during these oscilla
tions without loss of stability. If the increment
of load is too large, the arms willfly apart and
continue to rotate in opposite directions, indi
cating instability. This may happen even
though the total load is less than the steady
state stability limit.
The effect of switching out one of two parallel
lines may be simulated by connecting the arms
by two springs in parallel and then suddenly
disconnecting one spring by burning the piece FIG. 7. A mechanical
of string by which the spring is attached. ~ n a l o g u e of the effect of a
he li be si line fault on the power
The effect of a fault on t e hne may e SlDlU t f F" 1
ByS em 0 19
lated by suddenly pushing a point on the spring
toward the axle (Fig. 7). The arms will start to move apart, and sta
bility will be lost unless the spring is quickly released.
Models of this kind have been built to give a scale representation of
actual power systems of three or four machines, and the oscillations
of the arms have been recorded by movingpicture cameras.
6
There
are practical difficulties, however, in applying the model representation
to a complicated system. The chief value of the model is to illustrate
the elementary concepts of stability. Other methods of analysis are
used in practice.
Bad effects of instability. When one machine falls out of step with
the others in a system, it no longer serves its function. If it is a
10 THE STABILITY PROBLEM
generator, it no longer constitutes a reliable source of electric power.
If it is a motor, it no longer delivers mechanical power at the proper
speed, if at all. If it is a condenser, it no longer maintains proper
voltage at its terminals. An unstable twomachine system, consisting
of motor and generator, may be compared to a slipping belt or clutch
in a mechanical transmission system; instability means the failure of
the systemas a powertransmitting link.
Moreover, a large synchronous machine out of step is not only use
less; 'it is worse than uselessit is injuriousbecause it has a disturb
ing effect on voltages. Voltages will fluctuate up and down between
wide limits. Thus instability has the same bad effect on service to
customers' loads as does a fault, except that the effect of instability is
likely to last longer. If instability occurs as a consequenceof a fault,
clearing of the fault itself may not restore stability. The disturbing
voltage fluctuations then continue after the fault has been cleared.
The machine, or group of machines,' which is out of step with the rest
of the system must either be brought back into step or else discon
nected from the rest of the system. Either operation, if done manu
ally, may take a long time compared with the time required to clear a
fault automatically. As a rule, the best way to bring the machines
back into step is to disconnect them and then resynchronize them.
Protective relays have been developed to open a breaker at a pre
determined location when outofstep conditions occur. Such relays,
however, are not yet in wide use. Preferably the power system should
be split up into such parts that each part will have adequate generating
capacity connected to it to supply the load of that part. Some over
load may have to be carried temporarily until the system is resyn
chronized.
Ordinary protective relays are likely to operate falselyduring outof
step conditions, thereby tripping the circuit breakers of unfaulted
lines. Such false tripping may unnecessarily interrupt service to
tapped loads and may split the system apart at such points that the
generating capacity of some'parts is inadequate.]
The trend in powersystem design has been toward increasing the
reliability of electric power service. Since instability has a bad effect
on the quality of service, a power system should be designed and
operated so that instability is improbable and will occur only rarely.
Scope of this book. This book will deal with two different phases of
the problem of powersystem stability: (1) methods of analysis and
calculation to determine whether a given system is stable when sub
jected to a specified disturbance; (2) an examination of the effect of
liThia aspect of relay operation is discussed fully in Chapter X, Vol. II.
HISTORICAL REVIEW 11
various factors on stability, and a consideration of measures for im
proving stability. In our discussion these two phases will be related:
after a method of analysis is presented, it will be applied to show the
effect of varying different factors. Among these factors are system
layout, circuit impedances, loading of machines and circuits, type of
fault, fault location, method of clearing, speed of clearing, inertia of
machines, kind of excitation systems used with the machines, machine
reactances, neutral grounding impedance, and damper windings on
machines.
Since transient power limits are lower than steadystate power
limits, and since any power system will be subject to various shocks,
the most severe of which are short circuits, the subject of transient
stability is much more important than steadystate stability. Ac
cordingly, the greater part of this book is devoted to transient stability.
Chapter XV, Vol. III, deals with steadystate stability.
Historical review. Since stability is a problem associated with the
parallel operation of synchronous machines, it might be suspected that
the problem appeared when synchronous machines were first operated
in parallel. The first serious problem of parallel operation, however,
was not stability, but hunting. When the necessity for parallel opera
tion of ac. generators became general, most of the generators were
driven by directconnected steam engines. The pulsating torque
delivered by those engines gave rise to hunting, which was sometimes
aggravated by resonance between the' period of pulsation of prime
mover torque and the electromechanical period of the power system.
In some cases improper design or functioning of the engine governors
also aggravated the hunting. Hunting of synchronous motors and
converters was sometimes due to another cause, namely, too high a
resistance in the supply line.
The seriousness of hunting was decreased by the introduction of the
damper winding, invented by Lelslanc in France and by Lamme in
America. Later, the problem largely disappeared on account of the
general use of steam turbines, which have no torque pulsations.
Nearly all the prime movers in use nowadays, both steam turbines and
water wheels, give a steady torque. A few generators are still driven
by steam engines or by internal combustion engines. These, as well
as synchronous motors driving compressors, have a tendency to hunt,
but, on the whole, hunting is no longer a serious difficulty.
In the first ten or twenty years of this century, stability was not yet a
significant problem. Before automatic voltagecontrolling devices
(generatorvoltage regulators, induction feedervoltage regulators,
synchronous condensers, and the like) had been developed, the power
12 THE STABILITY PROBLEM
systems had to be designed to have good inherent voltage regulation.
This requirement called for low reactance in circuits and machines.
As a consequence of the low reactances, the stability limits (both
steadystate and transient) were well above the normally transmitted
power.
The development of automatic voltage regulators made it possible
to increase generator reactances in order to obtain a more economical
design and to limit shortcircuit currents. By use of induction regu
lators to control feeder voltages, transmission lines of higher impedance
became practicable. These factors, together with the increased use of
generator and bus reactors to decrease shortcircuit currents, led to a
decrease in the inherent stability of metropolitan power systems.
Stability first became an important problem, however, in connection
with longdistance transmission, which is usually associated with
remote hydroelectric stations feeding into metropolitan load centers. ~
The application of the automatic generatorvoltage regulator to syn
chronous condensers made it possible to get good local voltage regula
tion from a hydroelectric station and a transmission line of high re
actanceand hence of lowsynchronizing power. The high investment
in these longdistance projects made it desirable to transmit as much
power as possible over a given line, and there was a temptation to
transmit normal power approaching the steadystate stability limit.
In a few cases instability occurred during steadystate operation, and
more frequently it occurred because of short circuits. The stability
problem is still more acute in connection with longdistance transmis
sion from a generating station to a load center than it is in connection
with metropolitan systems. It should not be inferred, however, that
metropolitan systems have no stability problems.
Another type of longdistance transmission which has frequently
involved a stability problem is the interconnection between two large
power systems for the purpose of exchanging power to obtain economies
in generation or to provide reserve capacity. In many cases the con
necting ties were designed to transmit an amount of power 'whichwas
small in comparison with the generating capacity of either system.
Consequently, the synchronizing power which the line could transmit
was not enough to retain stability if a severe fault occurred on either
system. There was also considerable danger of steadystate pullout
if the power on the tie line was not controlled carefully.
From about 1920 the problem of powersystem stability was the
object of thorough investigation. Tests were made both on laboratory
,Among such hydroelectric stations are Big Creek, Bucks Creek, Pit River,
Fifteen Mile Falls, Conowingo, and Boulder Dam.
HISTORICAL REVIEW 13
setups and on actual power systems, methods of analyses were de
veloped and checked by tests, and measures for improving stability
were developed. Some of the important steps in analytical develop
ment were the following:
1. Circle diagrams for showing the steadystate performance of
transmission systems. These diagrams consist of a family of circles,
each of which is the locus of the vector power for fixed voltages at
both sending and receiving ends of the line. The circles are drawn
on rectangular coordinates, the abscissas and ordinates of which are,
respectively, active and reactive power at either end of the line.
These diagrams show clearly the maximum power which a line will
carry in the steady state for given terminal voltages, as well as the
relation between the power transmitted and the angular displace
ment between the voltages at the t\VO ends of the line. (Such
diagrams are described in Chapter XV, Vol. III.)
2. Improvements in synchronousmachine theory, especially the
extension of tworeaction theory to the transient performance of
both salientpole and nonsalientpole machines. A number of new
reactances were defined and used. (See Chapter XII, Vol. III.)
More recently, the effect of saturation on these reactances has been
investigated. (See Chapters XII and XV, Vol. III.)
3. The method of symmetrical components for calculating the
effect of unsymmetrical short circuits. (See Chapter VI.) In this
connection, methods of determining the sequence constants of ap
paratus by test and by calculation had to be devised.
4. Pointbypoint methods of solving differential equations, particu
larly the swing equation (giving angular position of a machine
versus time). (See Chapter II.)
5. The equalarea criterion for stability of twomachine systems,
obviating the more laborious calculation of swing curves for such
systems. (See Chapter IV.)
6. The ac. calculating board or network analyzer for the solution
of complicated ac. networks. (See Chapter III.)
The methods of analysis and calculation now in use are believed to be
sufficiently accurate for determining whether any given power system
in a given operating condition will be stable when subjected to a given
disturbance. The calculations, however, are rather laborious ,vhen
applied to a large number of different operating conditions of a com
plicated power system.
Methods of analysis will be taken up in the following chapters.
Calculated results have been checked in a number of instances by
14 THE STABILITY PROBLEM
observations on actual power systems recorded with automatic oscil
lograph equipment.
REFERENCES
1. R. D. BOOTH and G. C. DAHL, "Power System Stabilitya Nonmathe
matical Review," Gen. Elec. Rev., vol. 33, pp. 67781, December, 1930; and vol. 34,
pp. 13141, February, 1931.
2. A.I.E.E. Subcommittee on Interconnection and Stability Factors, "First
Report of PowerSystem Stability," Elec. Eng., vol. 56, pp. 26182, February, 1937;
3. O. G. C. DAHL, Electric Power Circuits, vol. II, PowerSystem Stability, New
York, McGrawHill Book Co., 1938.
4. Electrical Transmission and Distribution Reference Book, by Central Stauon
Engineers of the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company, East Pitts
burgh, Pa., 1st edition, 1942.
a. Chapter 8, "Power System StabilityBasic Elements of Theory and Ap
plication," by R. D. EVANS.
b. Chapter 9, "System StabilityExamples of Calculation," by H. N.
MULLER, JR.
5. S. B. GRISCOM, "A Mechanical Analogy of the Problem of Transmission
Stability," Elec. Jour., vol. 23, pp. 2305, l\1ay, 1926.
6. R. C. BERGVALL and P. H. ROBINSON, "Quantitative Mechanical Analysis of
Power System Transient Disturbances," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 47, pp. 91525,
July, 1928; disc., pp. 9258. Use of mechanical model with seven arms for in
vestigating transient stability of Conowingo transmission system.
PROBLEMS ON CHAPTER I
1. Two synchronous machines of equal rating, having internal voltages
(voltages behind transient reactance) of 1.2 and 1.0 per unit, respectively,
and transient reactances of 0.25 per unit each, are connected by a line having
0.50 per unit reactance and negligible resistance. Assume that the angle
~ between the two machines varies from 0 to 360
0
by 15 steps, and calculate
for each step the current, the power, and the voltage at each of three points:
at each end of the line and at its midpoint. Draw loci of the current and
voltage vectors, marking the values of 0 thereon. Also plot in rectangular
coordinates current, power, and voltage, all as functions of o.
2. Draw the powerangle curve and discuss the condition for stability of
two machines connected through series capacitive reactance which exceeds
the internal inductive reactance of both machines.
CHAPTER II
THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
Review of the laws of mechanics; translation. Since a synchronous
machine is a rotating body, the laws of mechanics applying to rotating
bodies apply to it. Review of these laws may be advantageous at this
point. The laws of rotating bodies will be clearer if we first review the
laws which apply to linear motion, or translation.
TABLE 1
FUNDAMENTAL AND DERIVED QUANTITIES OF MECHANICS, ApPLYING
PARTICULARLY TO
Quantity Symbol Defining Equation
Unit and
Dimensions
Its Abbreviation
Length x ... meter (m.) L
Mass m ... kilogram (kg.) M
Time t ... second (sec.) T
dx
[1]
ur:' Velocity v v = meter per second (m.
dt
per sec.)
dv
Acceleration a a = [2] meter per second per Lr
2
dt
second (m. per sec.")
Force F F = ma [3] *newton (newt.) MLT2
Momentum M' M' = mv [4] *newtonsecond (newt
MLTl
sec.)
Work W W =fFdx
[5] joule (j.)
ML
2
T 2
Power
p.
P = dW
[6J watt (w.) ML
2
r
3
dt
* Unofficial name.
The fundamental quantities of mechanics are length, mass, and time.
The fundamental units (in the m.k,s. system, which is nowthe recognized
system of units for electrical work) are the meter, the kilogram, and the
second. From these fundamental quantities and their units are derived
other quantities,' such as velocity, acceleration, force, momentum,
work, and power, and their units. In Table 1 are listed the funda
mental quantities and certain derived quantities with their symbols,
defining equations, units and the abbreviations thereof, and dimen
15
16 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
sions in terms of the fundamental quantities length (L), mass (M),
and time (T).
Besides the defining equations (numbers 1 to 6 of Table 1), certain
other equations giving relations between these quantities which are of
interest are derived below. Substitution of eq. 1 into eq. 2 gives for
the acceleration
[7]
[8]
Substitution of eq. 2 and eq. 7 in turn into eq. 3 gives
dv d
2x
F=m=m
dt dt
2
Comparison of eq. 8 with the time derivative of eq. 4 gives the addi
tional relation
dM'
F=
dt
Differentiation of eq. 5 with respect to x gives
F= dW
dx
Substitution for dW from eq. 10 into eq. 6 gives
Fdx
p =. = Fv
dt
Integration of eq. 9 with respect to t gives
M' = JFdl
From eqs. 11, 3, and 4 we obtain
P = Fv = mav = aM'
whence
Af' =~
a
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12].
[13]
[14]
The kinetic energy of a moving body may be obtained by finding the
work required to set it in motion from rest, as follows:
W = JFdx = mJdV dx = mJdV vdt
d ~ d ~
= mJ: v dv = !mv
2
= !M'v [15]
ROTATION 17
Rotation. In treating rotation we must first introduce the concept of
angle. An angle is defined, with reference to a circular arc with its
center at the vertex of the angle, as the ratio of arc 8 to radius r, thus:
8
(}=
r
[16]
The unit of angle so defined is the radian. The dimensions of angle
from the definition are length divided by length. For the present
purpose, however, it is well to recognize lengths that are perpendicular
to one another as having different dimensions, and to represent tan
gentiallengths by the symbol L as before and radial lengths by the
modified symbol LB. From this viewpoint the dimensions of angle
are LL
R

1
.....
r.
"
......
.......
....... 
"'
....... ,
y3,600 r.p.m.' condensing
......
...... ./ 3,600 r.p.m. noncondensin
.
f.+.J.:..[
T
The quantity H has the desirable property that its value, unlike
those of M or WR
2
, does not vary greatly with the rated kilovolt
amperes and speed of the machine, but instead has a characteristic
10
100
2
o 20 40 60 80
Generator ratingG (megavolt.amperes)
FIG. 1. Stored energy of large steam turbogenerators, turbine included (from
Ref. 1, by permission).
5
450514 r.p.m.
"
....... i\.
",
l..).......
"",.",
,.....
.......
lI'
,.
......

,....

,/ ",
...

',", 138 180r.p.m.
"7
e
......
r.p.m,
1
o 20 40 60 80 100
Generator rating G (megavolt amperes)
FIG. 2. Stored energy of large verticaltype waterwheel generators, including
allowance of 15% for water wheels (from Ref. 1, by permission).
value or set of values for each class of machine. In this respect H is
similar to the perunit reactance of machines. In the absence of more
definite information, a characteristic value of H may be used. Such
values are given in the curves of Figs. 1 and 2 for large steam turbo
26 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
Type of Machine
generators and for large verticalshaft waterwheel generators, respec
tively. In both cases the inertia of the prime movers is included, as
it always should be. For' other machines the values of H may be
taken from Table 4.
It will be observed that the value of H is considerably higher for
steam turbogenerators than for waterwheel generators, ranging from
3 to 10 Mj. per Mva, for the former and from 2 to 4 Mj. per Mva. for
the latter. Average values are about 6 and 3, respectively.
TABLE 4
AVERAGE VALUES OF STORED ENERGY IN ROTATING MACHINES
H, Stored Energy at Rated Speed
(megajoules per megavoltampere)
Synchronous motors
Synchronous condenserst
Large
Small
Rotary converters
Induction motors
Principally from Ref. 1.
t Hydrogen cooled, 25%less.
2.0
1.25
1.0
2.0
0.5
From 30 to 60% of the total inertia of a steam turbogenerator unit is
that of the prime mover, whereas only 4 to 15% of the inertia of a
hydroelectric generating unit is that of the water wheel, including
water. t
Inertia constant H, like the perunit reactance of machines or trans
formers, may be expressed on either of two voltampere bases: (a) the
machine rating or (b) a system base arbitrarily selected for a power
system study. The value of H for a given machine varies inversely as
the base, whereas perunit reactance varies directly as the base.t
EXAMPLE 1
Given the following information on a steam turbogenerator unit:
Rated output
Rated voltage
Rated speed
Moment of inertia
Number of poles
Rated frequency
85,000 kw. at 85% power factor
13,200 volts
1,800 r.p.m,
859,000 Ibft.
2
4
60 cycles per sec.
tSome data on moments of inertia of generators and their prime movers are
given in Table 1, Chapter VII.
iPerunit quantities are discussed in Chapter III.
SOLUTION OF THE SWING EQUATION 27
compute the following quantities:
Kinetic energy in megajoules at rated speed.
Inertia constant H.
Inertia constant M in megajouleseconds per electrical degree.
M in per unit on 50Mva. base.
Compare the computed value of H with the typical value read from the
curves of Fig. 1.
Solution. Rating = 85,000 = 100,000 kva. = 100 Mva.
0.85
From eq. 44 kinetic energy at rated speed is
N = 2.31 X 10
10
WR2n2
= 2.31 X 10
10
X 859,000 X (1,800)2
= 642 Mj.
From eq. 53
H = 642 = 6.42 Mj. per Mva.
100
From eq. 48
N 642 .
M =  = = 0.0595 Mjsec. per elec. deg.
180/ 180 X 60
If power is to be expressed in per unit instead of in megawatts, this result
must be divided by the base power. Thus
M = 0.0595 = 0.00119 'per unit on 50Mva. base
50
From Fig. 1, 1800r.p.m. curve, at 100 Mva., H = 6.5, which agrees well
with the value of H computed above.
Pointbypoint solution of the swing equation. The swing equation,
a differential equation governing the motion of each machine of a
system, is
[55]
where 8 = displacement angle of rotor with respect to a reference axis
rotating at normal speed.
M = inertia constant of machine.
P
a
= accelerating power, or difference between mechanical input
and electrical output after each has been corrected for
losses.
t = time.
28 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
The solution of this equation gives 0 as a function of t. A graph of the
solution is known as a swing curve. Inspection of the swing curves of
all the machines of a system will show whether the machines will re
main in synchronism after a' disturbance. Many examples of swing
curves obtained in stability studies on multimachine systems are in
cluded in Chapter VII. Both stable and unstable conditions are il
lustrated there.
In a multirnachine system, the output and hence the accelerating
power of each machine depend upon the angular positionsand, to be
more rigorous, also upon the angular speedsof all the machines of the
system. Thus, for a threemachine system there are three simulta
neous differential equations like eq. 55:
[56a]
[56b]
(56c]
Formal solution of such a set of equations is not feasible. Even the
simplest case, which was considered in Chapter I, of one finite machine
connected through reactance to an infinite bus, with damping neglected,
leads to an equation
[57]
the formal solution of which, with Pi = 0, involves elliptic integrals."
Equation 57, with Pi 0, has been solved by use of a calculating
machine called an integraph or differential analyzer,
3
and it is possible
that machine methods of solution could be applied (although they have
not been yet) to solving the swing equations of multimachine systems.
Pointbypoint solution is the most feasible and widely used way of
solving the swing equations. Such solutions, which are also called
stepbystep solutions, are applicable to the numerical solution of all
sorts of differential equations. Good accuracy can be attained, and
the computations are simple.
4

7
In a pointbypoint solution one or more of the variables are assumed
either to be constant or to vary according to assumed laws throughout
a short interval of time ~ t , so that as a result of the assumptions made
SOLUTION OF THE SWING EQUATION 29
the equations can be solved for the changes in the other variables
during the same time interval. Then, from the values of the other
variables at the end of the interval, new values can be calculated for
the variables which were assumed constant. These new values are
then used in the next time interval.
In applying the pointbypoint method to the solution of swing
equations, it is customary to assume that the accelerating power (and
hence the acceleration) is constant during each time interval, although
it has different values in different intervals. When this assumption
is made, a formal solution of eq. 55 can be obtained which is valid
throughout a particular time interval; and from the formal solution
and the values of ~ and w at the beginning of the interval the values of
aand w at the end of the interval can be computed for each machine.
Before a similar computation can be made for the next interval, how
ever, it is necessary to know the new value of accelerating power, or
difference between input and output, of each machine. The mechan
ical inputs are usually assumed constant, because of the slowness of
governor action, but the electrical outputs are functions of the rela
tive angular positions of all the machines of the system and can be
found by solving the network to which the machines are connected.
If damping power is taken into account, the output, including damp
ing, will depend also on the relative angular speeds of all the machines.
It therefore becomes clear that the pointbypoint solution of swing
curves consists of two processes which are carried out alternately.
The first process is the computation of the angular positions, and per
haps also of the angular speeds, at the end of a time interval from a
knowledge of the positions and speeds at the beginning of the interval
and the accelerating power assumed for theinterval, The second
process is the computation of the accelerating power of each machine
from the angular positions (and perhaps speeds) of all machines of the
system. The secondprocess requires a knowledgeof network solution,
a topic which is discussed in Chapter III. In the present chapter the
emphasis is on the first process, namely, the solution of the swing
equation proper. Two different pointbypoint methods will be
described.
Method1 is the more obvious, although the less accurate, of the two
methods. In method 1 it is assumed that the accelerating power is
constant throughout a time interval lit and has the value computed for
the beginning of the interval. No further assumptions are made. If
eq. 55 is divided by M and integrated twice with respect to t, Pa being
See discussion of Assumption 1 on p. 43.
30 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
treated as a constant, we obtain successively
do ~ a t
 =w=wo+
dt M
and
[58]
[59]
These equations give, respectively, w, the excessof speed of the machine
over normal speed, and 0, the angular displacement of the machine
with respect to a reference axis rotating at normal speed. 00 and Wo
are the values of 0 and w, respectively, at the beginning of the interval.
These equations hold for any instant of time t during the interval in
which P
a
is constant. We are particularly interested, however, in the
values of 0 and w at the end of the interval. Let subscript n denote
quantities at the end of the nth interval. Likewise let n  1 denote
quantities at the end of the (n  l)th interval, which is the beginning
of the nth interval. At is the length of the interval. Putting At in
place of t in eqs. 58 and 59 and using the appropriate subscripts, we
obtain for the speed and angle at the end of the nth interval
At
Wn = Wnl + M Pa(nl) [60]
(At)2
On = Onl + At Wnl + 2M Pa(nl) [61]
The increments of speed and angle during the nth interval are
At
aWn = Wn  Wnl = M Pa(nl) [62]
(At)2
aOn == On  Onl = at Wnl + 2M Pa(nl) [63]
Equations 60 and 61, or eqs. 62 and 63, are suitable for pointbypoint
calculation. However, if one is interested only in the angular position
(for plotting a swing curve) and not in the speed, Wnl may be elim
inated from eqs. 61 and 63, as follows: Write an equation like eq. 61
but for the preceding interval
. ( ~ t ) 2
Onl = On2 + ~ t Wn 2 + 2M Pa(n2) [64]
and subtract it from eq. 61, obtaining
(on  OnI) = (Onl  On2) + At(Wnl  Wn2)
(At)2
+ 2M (Pa(nl)  Pa(n2) [65J
SOLUTION OF THE SWING EQUATION
But
31
and from eq. 62
Making these substitutions into eq. 65, we get
dt ( ~ t ) 2
a6n = a61ll + at M Pa(1l2) + 2M (Pa(1ll)  Pa(1l2)
(dt)2
== a8n_ l + 2M (Pa(nl) + pa(n2 [66]
This equation, which gives the increment in angle during any interval
in terms of the increment for the previous interval, may be used for
pointbypoint calculations in place of eqs. 62 and 63. The last term
is the second difference of 5, which may be symbolized by t!A
2
5.
The time interval ~ t should be short enough to give the required
accuracy, but not so short as to unduly increase the number of points
to be computed on a given swing curve. Example 2 will throw some
light on the effect of the length of interval upon the accuracy of the
solution.
EXAMPLE 2
If a synchronous machine performs oscillations of small amplitude with
respect to an infinite bus, its power output may be assumed to be directly
proportional to its angular displacement from the infinite bus. Because this
case is known to result in sinusoidal oscillations, as may be verified readily by
formal solution of the swing equation, it will serve well as a check on the
accuracy of various pointbypoint solutions,
Consider a 60cycle machine for which H = 2.7 Mj. per Mva. and which is
initially operating in the steady "tate with input and output of 1.00 unit and
an angular displacement of 45 elec. deg. with respect to an infinite bus.
Upon occurrence of a fault, assume that the input remains constant and that
the output is given by
(a)
even though the amplitude of oscillation may be great. Calculate one cycle
of the swing curve by means of (a) the formal solution and (b) a pointby
32 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
point solution, method 1, using various values of time interval ~ t , 0.05 sec.
being tried first.
Solution. (a) Formal solution. The differential equation, with 0 expressed
in electrical radians, is
d ~ 2
M dt
2
= P; = Pi  P = 1  ;;: 0 (b)
and the initial conditions are
o= ~
4
when t = O.
The solution is
and ~ = o
dt
(c)
~

7r 7r 2
0=2"4cOS 7rM
t
TABLE 5
COMPUTATION OF Swrso CURVE FROM FORMAL SOLUTION
OF SWING EQUATION (EXAMPLE 2)
(d)
t (sec.) 382t (deg.) cos 382t
45 cos 382t
8 (deg.)
(deg.)
0 0.0 1.000 45.0 45.0
0.05 19.1 0.945 42.5 47.5
0.10 38.2 0.786 35.4 54.6
0.15 57.3 0.540 24.3 65.7
0.20 76.4 0.235 10.6 79.4
0.25 95.5 0.096  4.3 94.3
0.30 114.6 0.416 18.7 108.7
0.35 133.7 0.691 31.1 121.1
0.40 152.8 0.889 40.0 130.0
0.45 171.9 0.990 44.5 134.5
0.50 191.0 0.982 44.2 134.2
0.55 210.1 0.865 38.9 128.9
0.60 229.2 0.653 29.4 119.4
0.65 248.3 0.370 16.7 106.7
0.70 267.4 0.045  2.0 92.0
0.75 286.5 0.284 12.8 77.2
0.80 305.6 0.582 26.2 63.8
0.85 324.7 0.816 36.7 53.3
0.90 343.8 0.960 43.2 46.8
0.95 362.9 0.999 45.0 45.0
1.00 382.0 0.927 41.7 48.3
which may be verified by differentiating eq. d twice with respect to t and
then substituting the result and eq. d itself into eq. b; also by substituting
l = 0 into eq. d and its first derivative and comparing the results with eqs. c.
SOLUTION OF THE SWING EQUATION
The period of oscillation is given by
T = 21r = 1r V21rM
V2/1rM
The inertia constant is
33
(e)
H 2.7 2 1 d
M =  = = 0.01432 unit power sec. per e ec. ra
7rf 1r X 60
= .!! = 2.5 X 10
4
unit power sec."per elec. deg. (or, simply, per unit).
180!
If the first value of M is used in eq. e, the period is found to be
T = 1r V21r X 0.01432 = 0.943 sec.
If 5 is expressed in electrical degrees instead of in radians, the solution
becomes
5 = 90  45 cos (382t)0
(I)
The amplitude of oscillation is 45.
Values of 0 at 0.05sec. intervals of t are computed from eq. f in Table 5.
(b) Pointbypoint solution, method 1 (ilt = 0.05 sec.) Substitution of
the values of ilt and Minto eqs..62 and 63 gives
ilt 0.05
~ W n = M Pa(nl) = Pa(nl) = 200 Pa(nl) (g)
0.00025
(ilt)2
~ O n = ilt Wnl + 2M Pa(nl) = O.05wn  1 +5Pa(n.l) (h)
Computation of the swing curve from eqs. g and h is carried out in Table 6.
The swing curve is plotted as curve 3 in Fig. 3, where it is compared with the
correct curve (curve 1) calculated from the formal solution, part a of this
example.
Comparison of curves 1 and 3 of Fig. 3 shows that curve 3, computed by
pointbypoint method 1, although having very nearly the correct period,
increases in amplitude approximately 29% in each halfcycle, or 67% in
each cycle of oscillation. II The accuracy is poor.
It seems reasonable that the accuracy would be improved by the use of a
shorter interval. Consequently, let us try ilt = 0.0167 sec. (onethird of the
former value). Then in place of eqs. g and h we have
111.67 = (1.29)2.
dWn = 66.7P
a
(n  l )
L18n = O.OI67wn l +0.555Pa(nl)
(i)
(j)
34 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
TABLE 6
POINTByPOINT COMPUTATION OF SWING CURVE
(METHOD 1, tlt = 0.05 sEc.)(ExAMPLE 2)
t P
u
P
a
liw w 0.05w 5P
a
tl8 8
(sec. ) (p.u.) (p.u.) (deg.Zsec.) (deg.Zsec.) (deg.) (deg.) (deg.) (deg.)


0+
0.500 0.500 100 0 0.0 2.5 2.5 45.0
0.05 0.528 0.472 94 100 5.0 2.4 7.4 47.5
0.10 0.610 0.390 78 194 9.7 2.0 11.7 54.9
0.15 0.740 0.260 52 272 13.6 1.3 14.9 66.6
0.20 0.906 0.094 19 324 16.2 0.5 16.7 81.5
0.25 1.091 0.091 18 343 17.2 0.5 16.7 98.2
0.30 1.277 0.277 55 325 16.2 1.4 14.8 114.9
0.35 1.441 0.441 88 270 13.5 2.2 11.3 129.7
0.40 1.567 0.567 113 182 9.1 2.8 6.3 141.0
0.45 1.637 0.637 127 69 3.4 3.2 0.2 147.3
0.50 1.639 0.639 128 58 2.9 3.2 6.1 147.5
0.55 1.571 0.571 114 186 9.3 2.9 12.2 141.4
0.60 1.436 0.436 87 300 15.0 2.2 17.2 129.2
0.65 1.244 0.244 49 387 19.4 1.2 20.6 112.0
0.70 1.016 0.016 3 436 21.8 0.1 21.9 91.4
0.75 0.772 0.228 46 439 22.0 1.1 20.9 69.5
0.80 0.540 0.460 92 393 19.6 2.3 17.3 48.6
0.85 0.348 0.652 130 301 15.0 3.3 11.7 31.3
0.90 0.218 0.792 158 171 8.6 3.8 4.8 19.6
0.95 0.164 0.836 167 13 0.6 4.2 3.6 14.8
1.00 .. . . .. . .. 154 . .. ... . .. 18.4
The detailed calculations are not shown here, but they are similar to those of
Table 6. The swing curve is plotted as curve 2 in Fig. 3. It is found that
the amplitude error has been reduced to 9% in a half cycle or 21% in a
cycleabout onethird of the corresponding errors with dt = 0.05 sec.
These errors are still pretty large, and the labor of calculation is excessive
because so many points must be calculated.
.Two additional curves (4 and 5), calculated for larger values of dt
(0.10 and 0.15 sec., respectively), have been plotted in Fig. 3. As might be
expected, the amplitudes increase faster than before. Besides, the period
is noticeably lengthened.
Example 2 has demonstrated that swingcurves calculated by method
1 are subject to a considerable cumulative error which manifests itself
by increase in both the amplitude and the period of oscillation, espe
cially in the amplitude. The reason for the errors is not hard to find.
Consider a time, such as the first half cycle of the harmonic oscillation
of. Example 2, during which the acceleration is diminishing. Such a
curve of acceleration versus time is shown in Fig. 4. In method 1 the
SOLUTION OF THE SWING EQUATION 35
1.0 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1
5
r " .... ,
]'00,
[\
/
,
\.
ill
\
3 \
/,/
V'1
t\;
')
I.'
\ \
l(i;j
VT
\ .
l\\
'f
N'
b'
"
f\
i\
j
r
Nb
I
"
If
,
1 Formal solution
"
P = Pc> P = 1
a ,u 900
For t1t = 0.05 sec., which will be tried first, we have
(t1t)2 = (0.05 )2 = 10
M 2.5 X 104
and eq. 73 becomes
(a)
(b)
The detailed calculations are carried out in Table 7. Note that, for
t = 0, the instant of occurrence of the fault, the values of Pu and of Pa are
entered both for the fault off (at t = 0) and for the fault on (at t = 0+).
The average value of Pais used.
The order in which items (except t) are entered in the table is: from left to
right across a line until the column headed "lOPa" is reached; then diago
nally downward and to the right to the"value of 0in the line belowthe starting
point; thence to the "Pu" column in the same line; and so on. Each new
value of flo is found by addition of the previous value of flo and the value of
lOPa between the old and new values of dO. Each new value of 0is found in
similar fashion by addition of the preceding value of aand the value of f16
between the old and new values of o.
Comparison of the values of 0 in Table 7 with the corresponding values in
Table 5, computed from the formal solution, shows a maximum discrepancy
of 1.0
0
in the first cycle of oscillation. The agreement of the pointbypoint
solution with the formal solution is very satisfactory.
Similar calculations were made for at = 0.10 sec., 0.15 see., 0.20 sec., and
0.25 sec. The details of calculation are not shown here, but the resulting
swing curves are plotted in Fig. 7. The curves numbered 3, 4, and 5, and
the symbols used for them, correspond with the curves of Fig. 3 for like
values of dt. The formal solution is not plotted in Fig. 7 but agrees with
curve 3 to the accuracy of plotting.
It may be noted in Fig. 7 that, as t1t is increased, the calculated swing
curves remain and correct in amplitude, but that their periods
decrease. Even when the points are so far apart that they are not adequate
to determine the shape of the curve (as for = 0.25 sec., giving fewer than
4 points per cycle), a sinewave can be drawn through them.
The curve for at = 0.1 sec. would be considered accurate enough for
engineering use in a stability study. In actual studies the usual periods of
oscillation are from 0.5 to 2 sec., and at is commonly taken as 0.05 or 0.1
sec. The value 0.1 sec. usually suffices and, in addition to requiring only
half as many steps as 0.05 sec., has the advantage that multiplication or
division by can be performed merely by shifting the decimal point.
In Table 8 a comparison is made of the errors in the amplitudes and periods
of the curves calculated by methods 1 and 2 in Examples 2 and 3, respectively.
TABLE 7
POINTByPOINT COMPUTATION OP SWING CURVE
(METHOD 2, at = 0.05 sEc.)(ExAMPLE 3)
t (sec.) P (p.u.) Po, (p.u.) 10Po, (deg.) f:.8 (deg.) 8 (deg.)
0 1.000 0 ...
"
...
0+
0.500 0.500 ...
..
...
oavg. ... 0.250 2.5
..
45.0
2.5
0.05 0.528 0.472 4.7 47.5
7.2
0.10 0.609 0.391 3.9 54.7
11.1
0.15 0.731 0.269 2.7 65.8
13.8
0.20 0.885 0.115 1.2 79.6
15.0
0.25 1.052 0.052 0.5 94.6
14.5
0.30 1.214 0.214 2.1 109.1
12.4
0.35 1.350 0.350 3.5 121.5
8.9
0.40 1.450 0.450 4.5 130.4
4.4
0.45 1.497 0.497 5.0 134.8
0.6
0.50 1.492 0.492 4.9 134.2
5.5
0.55 1.430 0.430 4.3 128.7
9.8
0.60 1.320 0.320 3.2 118.9
13.0
0.65 1.177 0.177 1.8 105.9
14.8
0.70 1.011 0.011 0.1 91.1
14.9
0.75 0.847 0.153 1.5 76.2
13.4
0.80 0.697 0.303 3.0 62.8
10.4
0.85 0.582 0.418 4.2 52.4
6.2
0.90 0.514 0.486 4.9 46.2
1.3
0.95 0.499 0.501 5.0 44.9
3.7
1.00 0.540 0.460 4.6 48.6
8.3
1.05 0.632 0.386 3.7 56.9
12.0
1.10 ... .. . ... 68:9
41
1.0 1.1
THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Time t (seconds)
. ~ f I
~ . ~
~
\
/
V
\.\'
~ lit:
\\
II
\
~ . \ ~ \
~
h
\. \'
I ~
\ \\'
~
.'
\ \ /
,f
\.
\ ~ \
7 :
54
'I
6 p)
.
v
1\ '\
t ~
/
V
3
/
\'l
' .
. ~ ~
. "
3Cl
0
o L\t =0.05 sec.
466 L\t=0.10 sec.
500 L\t =0.15 sec.
6 L\t=0.20 sec.
7  L\t =0.25 sec.
I I I I I
o
o
30
15
42
150
135
120
;;;
..
~ 105
..
'0
13
90
:s
:rl
~
'0
75
~
c
...
1:
60
..
E
..
u
45
...
1i.
Ul
i;i
FIG. 7. Swing curves calculated by pointbypoint method 2 with various values
of At (Example 3).
TABLE 8
PERCENTAGE ERRORS IN AMPLITUDE AND PERIOD OF
SINUSOIDAL OSCILLATION C OMPUTED BY POlNTByPOlNT
METHODS 1 AND 2 WITH VARIOUS V ALUES OF t
Per cent Error in Amplitude
Points
Per cent Error
At
per True
At End of One Cycle
At Half
in Period
(sec.)
Cycle
Cycle
Method 1 Method 2 Method 1 Method 1 Method e
0.0167 56 +21 ...
+9 +1 ...
0.05 19
+68 0 +29 +2 0.4
0.10 9.4 + 191 0 + 67 +5 2
0. 15 6.2 +300 0 +100 +11 5
0.20 4.7 . .. 0 ... . .. 9
0.25 3.7 . .. 0 . .. . .. 15
ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN STABILITY STUDIES 43
The superiority of method 2 over method 1 is shown unmistakably by
Table 8 and by the curves. Method 2 with at = 0.10 sec. yields more
accurate results than method 1 with at = 0.0167 sec., and the results are
obtained with less than onesixth the amount of calculation.
Assumptions commonly made in stability studies. In the foregoing
discussion of the solution of the swing equation, it was tacitly assumed
that the accelerating power Pa was known at the beginning of each
interval, and, indeed, the equation could not be solved unless Pa were
known. Since P
a
= Pi  P
u
, both the input Pi and the output P
u
must be known. In the determination of Pi and P
u
the following
assumptions are usually made:
1. The input remains constant during the entire period of a swing
curve.
2. Damping or asynchronous power is negligible.
3. Synchronous power may be calculated from a steadystate
solution of the network to which the machines are connected.
4. Each machine may be represented in the network by a constant
reactance (directaxis transient reactance) in series with a constant
electromotive force (voltage behind transient reactance).
5. The mechanical angle of each machine rotor coincides with the
electrical phase of the voltage behind transient reactance.
These assumptions will now be discussed.
1. The input is initially equal to the output. When a disturbance
occurs, the output usually undergoes an abrupt change, but the input
is unchanged. The input to a generating unit is controlled by the
governor of its prime mover. The governor will not act until the
speed change exceeds a certain amount (usually 1%of normal speed),
depending on the adjustment of thE{governor, and even then there is a
time lag before the governor changes the input. During swings of the
synchronous machines the percentage change in speed is very small
until after synchronism is actually lost. Therefore governor action 'is
usually not a factor in determining whether synchronism will be lost,
and, accordingly, it is neglected.
2. The output (electric power) of a synchronous machine consists
of a synchronous part, depending on the relative angular positions of
all the machines of the system, and an asynchronous part, depending
on the relative angular speeds of all the machines. The asychronous
part may be taken into account if desired, but, as it is usually unim
portant in comparison to the synchronous part, it is commonly neg
lected in the interest of simplicity. The calculation of damping or
asynchronous power is discussed in Chapter XIV, Vol. III.
44 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
3. The network connecting the machines is not strictly in the steady
state during swinging of the machines, both because of sudden circuit
changes, such as application or removal of a fault, and because of the
more gradual change of phase of the electromotive forces due to the
swinging. However, as the periods of oscillation of the machines are
relatively long (of the order of 1 sec.) in comparison to the time
constants of the network, the network may be assumed, without
serious error, to be in the steady state at all times. Steadystate
network solution is presented in Chapter III.
4 and 5. The assumption that each machine can be represented by a
constant reactance in series with a constant voltage, and the assump
tion that the mechanical position of the rotor coincides with the phase
angle of the constant voltage, are not entirely correct. As a rule,
however, they do not lead to serious error in the determination of
whether a given system is stable. Since examination and justifica
tion of these assumptions require a considerable knowledge of syn
chronousmachine theory, they will not be attempted at this point but
will be postponed to Chapter XII, Vol. III.
EXAMPLE 4
A 25Mva. 6ocycle waterwheel generator delivers 20 Mw. over a double
circuit transmission line to a large metropolitan system which may be re
garded as an infinite bus. The generating unit (including the water whe 1)
has a kinetic energy of 2.76 Mj. per Mva. at rated speed. The directaxis
transient reactance of the generator is 0.30 per unit. The transmission cir
cuits have negligible resistances, and each has a reactance of O ~ 2 0 per unit
on a 25Mva. base. The voltage behind transient reactance of the generator
is 1.03 per unit, and the voltage of the metropolitan system is 1.00 per unit.
A threephase short circuit occurs at the middle of one transmission circuit
and is cleared in 0.4 sec. by the simultaneous opening of the circuit breakers
at both ends of the line.
Calculate and plot the swing curve of the generator for 1 sec.
Solution. The swing curve will be calculated by pointbypoint method
2, using a time interval of 0.05 sec. Before commencing the pointbypoint
calculations, we must know the inertia constant of the generator and the
powerangle equations for three different conditions of the network, namely:
(1) before the fault occurs; (2) while the fault is on; and (3) after the fault
has been cleared. The powerangle equation depends on the reactance be
tween the generator and the infinite bus.
Network reduction. Figure 8a is a reactance diagram of the system.
Before occurrence of the fault the reactance between points A and B is
found by series and parallel combinations to be
+
0.20 0
Xl = 0.30  = .40 per unit
2
ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN STABILITY STUDIES 45
When the fault is cleared, one of the parallel circuits is disconnected, making
the reactance
X3 = 0.30 +0.20 = 0.50 per unit
The equivalent series reactance between the generator and the infinite bus
while the fault is on may be found most readily by converting the Y circuit
GABF to a ~ , eliminating junction G. The resulting circuit is shown in
Fig. 8b. The reactance of the branch of the ~ between A and B is
X = 0.30 +0.20 +0.30 X 0.20
2 0.10
= 0.50 +0.60 = 1.10 per unit
The values of reactance of the other two branches are not needed because
these branches, being connected directly across the constantvoltage power
0.20
(a)
1.10
......rmrn'....... .......o
(b)
FIG. 8. (a) Reactance diagram of a system consisting of a generator A supplying
power over a doublecircuit transmission line to a large metropolitan system B
(Example 4). (b) Equivalent circuit of the system with a threephase short circuit
at the middle of one transmission circuit, point F of a. The circuit of b is obtained
from that of a by a y  ~ conversion to eliminate point G.
sources, have no effect on the power outputs of the sources, although they
increase the reactive power outputs. The same is true of the O.IOperunit
reactance at B. The powerangle equation for the circuit of Fig. 8b is the
same as it would be with these three shunt branches omitted.
Powerangle equations. The powerangle equation, giving the output
PuA of generator A as a function of the angle 0 between voltages E
A
and EB,
is
P
EAE
B
~ C ~
uA = SInu = sIn u
X
where C has the following values:
Before fault, C
1
= E
A
EB = 1.03 X 1.00 = 2.58
Xl 0.40
46 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
During fault, O
2
= EAE
B
= 1.03 X 1.00 = 0.936
X
2
1.10
After clearing, 0
3
= EAEB = 1.03 X 1.00 = 2.06
x, 0.50
Inertia constant. By eq. 54
M = GH = 1.00 X 2.76 = 2.56 X 104 er unit
180/ 180 X 60 P
I nitial conditions. The power output of generator A before the fault was
given as 20 Mw., which on a 25Mva. base is 0.80 per unit. The initial
angular position of A with respect to B is found by the prefault power
angle equation:
PuAl = 2.58 sin ~ = 0.80
sin ~ = 0.80 = 0.310
2.58
~ = 18.1
0
Immediately after occurrence of the fault the angular position is unchanged,
but the power output changes to that given by the fault powerangle equation
PuA2 = 0.936 sin ~
= 0.936 sin 18.1
0
= 0.936 X'O.310
= 0.290 p.u.
Pointbypoint calculations. Take the time interval as at = 0.05 sec.
The steps of calculation for each point are as follows:
Pa(nl) = Pi  Pu(nl) = 0.800  Pu(nl) perunit power
(at)2 (0.05)2
P a(nl) = 4 P a(nl) = 9.76 Pa(nl) elec. deg.
M 2.56 X 10
~ ~ n = .1on  1 + 9.76Pa (n  l ) elec. deg.
an = 8
n

l
+.1o
n
elec. deg,
Pun = C sin On perunit power
where C = C2 = 0.936 while the fault is on (0 < t < 0.4 sec.).
C = C = 2.06 after the fault has been cleared (0.4 < t).
At t = 0 and t = 0.4 sec. there are discontinuities in P; and hence in Ps,
and the average value should be used in calculating .10.
The calculations are carried out in Table 9. The swing curve is plotted in
TABLE 9
POINTByPOINT COMPUTATION OF SWING CURVE (EXAMPLE 4)
t C
sin 8
P
u
P
a
9.76P a A8 8
(sec. ) (p.u.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (elec. deg.) (elec, deg.) (elec. deg.)
0 2.58 0.310 0.800 0.000 18.1
0+
0.936 0.310 0.290 0.510 18.1
oRVg.
0.255 2.5
2.5
0.05
H
0.352 0.330 0.470 4.6 20.6
7.1
0.10
H
0.465 0.435 0.365 3.6 27.7
10.7
0.15
"
0.621 0.581 0.219 2.1 38.4
12.8
0.20
"
0.779 0.730 0.070 0.7 51.2
13.5
0.25
"
0.904 0.846 0.046 0.4 64.7
13.1
0.30
II
0.977 0.915 0.115 1.1 77.8
12.0
0.35
II
1.000 0.936 0.136 1.3 89.8
10.7
0.40
"
0.983 0.920 100.5
0.40+ 2.06
"
2.024
0.40 avg, 1.472 0.672 6.6
4.1
0.45
II
0.968 1.995 1.195 11.6 104.6
7.5
0.50
H
0.992 2.045 1.245 12.1 97.1
19.6
0.55
II
0.976 2.010 1.210 11.8 77.5
31.4
0.60
H
0.721 1.486 0.686  6.7 46.1
38.1
0.65
H
0.139 0.286 0.514 5.0 8.0
33.1
0.70
II
0.424 0.874 1.674 16.3 25.1
16.8
0.75
u
0.668 1.376 2.176 21.2 41.9
4.4
0.80
"
0.609 1.255 2.055 20.0 37.5
24.4
0.85
II
0.227 0.468 1.268 12.4 13.1
36.8
0.90
II
0.402 0.828 0.028 0.3 23.7
36.5
0.95
"
0.868 1.788 0.988 9.6 60.2
24.9
1.00
"
0.996 2.052 1.252 12.2 85.1
12.7
1.05 97.8
47
48
THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
Fig. 9, together with curves for several other clearing times. The system is
stable with 0.4sec. clearing. This fact becomes evident at 0.5 sec., and the
remainder of the swing computation is unnecessary if we merely wish to
know whether the system is stable with the given clearing time.
EXAMPLE 5
Determine the critical clearing time of a threephase short circuit at the
middle of one transmission line of the system of Example 4, assuming that
the circuit breakers at both ends of the line open simultaneously.
Critical clearing point
I
Sustained fault
...
cu
t
250 .....
 50 "_.i._a__'_.__ _'" _'
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Time (seconds)
FIG. 9. Swingcurvesfor the system of Fig. 8 (Example 4).
i 200
i
"0
150 ....
I
100
...
a
c
.9
150
Solution. First, the swing curve for a sustained short circuit is computed
and plotted. The computations of Example 4 may be used up to t = 0.4
sec.; but for t > 0.4 sec. new computations must be made by use of the
powerangleequation for the faulted condition. The swing curve is plotted
in Fig. 9. Obviously the system is unstable for a sustained fault. By in..
spection of the swing curve an estimate is made of the critical clearing time.
Say that we estimate 0.5 sec. The estimate is checked by computing the
swing curve for O.5sec. clearing, starting from the O.5sec. point of the
computation for a sustained fault. Computation of only two points or so
suffices to show that the system is stable with 0.58ec. clearing. A longer
clearing time is then tried. Several more swing curves may need to be
calculated, until two clearing times, differing slightly, are found, for one of
which the system is stable and for the other of which it is unstable. From
REFERENCES 49
the curves of Fig. 9 it may be concluded that the critical clearing time lies
between 0.6 and 0.65 sec. The critical clearing angle lies between 136 and
147.
Detailed computations are not given here because they are similar to those
of Example 4. It should be stated again that usually only a few points need
be calculated on each swing curve, departing from the curve for a sustained
fault at the assumed clearing time.
EXAMPLE 6
In Example 4 find the maximum percentage deviation of the speed from
its normal value, both before and after the time when it is first certain that
the system is stable.
Solution. Aswas mentioned in Example 4, about 0.5 sec. after occurrence
of the fault it is certain that the system is stable. The relative speed (aver
aged over a time interval ~ t ) is ~ 8 / lit, which, since ~ t is constant, is propor
tional to lia. The maximum value of ~ o before 0.5 sec. is 13.5 elect deg.;
the maximum value after 0.5 sec. is  38.1 elec. deg. The corresponding
relative speeds are 13.5/0.05 = 270 elect deg, per sec. and 38.1/0.05
= 762 elect deg. per sec. The normal speed, corresponding to a frequency
of 60 c.p.s., is 60 X 360 = 21,600 elec. deg. per sec. The percentage devia
tions from normal speed are (270/21,600)100 = 1.2% and (762/21,600)100
= 3.5%.
It appears that a governor set to be sensitive to a 1% change of speed
would have a negligible effect in determining whether the system was stable,
although it might have some effect on the ensuing oscillations.
REFERENCES
1. A.I.E.E. Subcommittee on Interconnection and Stability Factors, "First
Report of Power System Stability," Elec. Eng., vol. 56, pp. 26182, February, 1937.
2. FREDERICK S. WOODS, Advanced Calculus, New York, Ginn & Co., 1926.
Application of elliptic integrals to the motion of a pendulum, pp. 36971.
3. V. BUSH, "The Differential Analyzer: A New Machine for Solving Differential
Equations," Franklin Insi. Jour., vol. 212, pp. 44788, October, 1931.
4. R. H. PARK and E. H. BANCKER, "System Stability as a Design Problem,"
A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 48, pp. 17094, January, 1929. Includes description of
pointbypoint calculation of swing curves.
5. I. H. SUMMERS and J. B. MCCLURE, "Progress in the Study of System Sta
bility," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 49, pp. 13258, January, 1930. Appendix IV,
Sample Swing Curve Calculation, pp. 1456.
6. F. R. LoNGLEY, "The Calculation of Alternator Swing Curves," A.I.E.E.
Trans., vol. 49, pp. 112950, July, 1930; disc., pp. 11501.
7. O. G. C. DAHL, Electric Power Circuits, vol. II, Power System Stability,
New York, McGrawHill Book Co., 1938. Four methods of pointbypoint calcu
lation of swing curves, pp. 391401.
50 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
PROBLEMS ON CHAPTER II
1. Calculate the inertia constant M of a 25cycle 12,500kva. Llkv,
187.5r.p.m. waterwheelgenerator unit by taking a typical value of H from
Fig. 2.
2. In Example 4 plot on one sheet curves of angular position, relative
speed, and acceleration versus time.
3. Work the problem of Example 4, using ~ t = 0.1 sec. instead of 0.05
sec., and state whether you regard the accuracy of the swing curve so calcu
lated as satisfactory.
4. Work the problem of Example 4 for a clearing time of 0.625 sec. in
stead of 0.4 sec. Use ~ t = 0.05 sec. Is the system stable?
5. What is the critical clearing time of a threephase short circuit close to
the sending end of one transmission line of the system of Example 41
Assume simultaneous opening of both breakers. Which fault location is
more severe, the sending end or the middle of the line? Why?
6. In Probe 5 what is the critical opening time of the first (nearby)
breaker if the second (distant) breaker opens 0.5 sec. later than the first one?
7. Compute and plot the swing resulting from the opening of one of the
two parallel transmission circuits of Example 4 as a normal switching
operation.
8. The system of Example 4 is modified by the addition of a radial feeder
to the bus of station A. If a threephase fault occurs on this feeder at a
point separated from the bus by an impedance of jO.10 per unit and at a
time when the feeder is carrying a very light load and when the main trans
mission lines are loaded as in Example 4, and if the fault is cleared in 0.4
sec., is the shock to the system greater or less than that caused by the fault
at the middle of .one transmission line cleared in an equal time? Why?
9. Find the steadystate power limit of the system of Fig. 8a with one
transmission line switched out. Make the following assumptions: For each
load the terminal voltage of generator A is adjusted to 1.00 per unit, and the
power factor is unity. Then assume a very small disturbance to occur during
which the excitation voltage behind synchronous reactance of 0.90 per unit
remains constant.
10. Find the transient power limit of the system of Example 4 with a
threephase fault at the middle of one transmission line cleared in 0.4 sec. by
the simultaneous opening of the circuit breakers at both ends. Assume the
prefault conditions of generator terminal voltage and power factor to be as
described in Probe 9.
11. The system of Example 4 is modified by making the impedance of each
transmission line 0.10 +jO.20 per unit instead of 0 +jO.20 per unit. Find
the initial angular position of generator A with respect to the infinite bus if
the power output of A is 0.800 per unit at a voltage of 1.00 per unit and a
power factor of 1.00. Also find the power output and accelerating power
immediately after occurrence of a threephase short circuit at the middle of
PROBLEMS
51
one line. Does neglecting resistance give an optimistic or a pessimistic re
sult for the stability of a system having one generator and an infinite bus?
12. Show that pointbypoint method 2 is equivalent to making the
substitution
in the swing equation.
13. It is known that the differential equation
(a)
has a solution
(b)
the real part of which represents a simple harmonic variation of awith t with
a period T = 21r/k. Show that the corresponding difference equation
(c)
in which an denotes the value of 8 at a time t = n ~ t , has a similar solution
where
2. k ~ t
'' =  sln
1
~ t 2
(d)
(e)
14. By using eq. e of Probe 13 calculate the percentage error in period of a
simple harmonic oscillation as a function of the number of points per cycle
when the oscillation is calculated by pointbypoint method 2.
25rv
Fault
FIG. 10. Power systemwith frequency changer Be (Probs. 15 and 16).
15. Describe the procedure for calculating swing curves of the machines of
Fig. 10, where A is a 60cycle generator; BG, a synchronoussynchronous
60to25cycle motorgenerator set (frequency changer); and D, a 25cycle
synchronous motor (or generator with such local load that it is equivalent to
a motor for stability analysis). State specifically all respects in which the
procedure differs from that for a system in which all machines are electrically
in parallel.
52 THE SWING EQUATION AND ITS SOLUTION
16. Compute swing curves of the four machines of the system of Fig. 10
for a sustained threephase fault at the end of the branch line near B. Data
on the system are as follows:
Reactances in per unit on a system bas6
Lines
AB 0.40
CD 0.20
Branch from B to fault 0.20
Machines
A 0.10
B 0.20
C 0.15
D 0.15
Inertiaconstants (H) on the system base
A 8.0
B 1.0
C 1.0
D 6.0
Initial conditions
Load of 1.00 per unit transmitted from A to D.
Terminal voltages of Band C
J
1.00 per unit.
Power factor at terminals of Band C, 1.00.
17. What are the dimensions of inertia constant H? Give a physical
interpretation.
CHAPTER III
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
Determination of the swing curves of the several synchronous
machines of a power system, as has been mentioned, consists of two
processeswhich must be carried on alternately: (1) the solution of the
swing equation of each machine, giving the change in angular position
during a short interval of time due to a known accelerating power;
and (2) the solution of the network to which the machines are con
nected, giving the output of each machine when the angular positions
of all machines are known. In Chapter II attention was focussed on
the solution of the swing equation, and the network solution required
for Example 4 was purposely made as simple as possible by using a
twomachine reactance system. The solution of the swing equation
was found to be very simple. It becomes no more complicated if the
number of machines is increased except that a similar calculation has
to be made for each machine. The solution of the network, on the
other hand, rapidly becomesmore laborious as the number of machines
is increased. The methods of network solution required for stability
studies will be outlined in this chapter.
The impedance diagram (positivesequence* network). Before the
network can be solved, however, it must first be established. The
starting point i s ~ usually a oneline diagram of the power system to be
studied, showing generators, synchronous condensers and other large
synchronous machines, reactors, transformers, transmission lines, and
loads. The diagram is usually limited to the major transmission sys
tem. As a rule, distribution circuits and small loads are not shown in
detail but are taken into account merely as lumped loads on substation
busses. From the oneline diagram there is prepared a diagram in
which all significant 'electrical elements of the power system are rep
resented on a singlephase (linetoneutral) basis by their positive
sequence equivalent circuits with proper values of impedance. The
values of impedance of individual apparatus are commonly given either
in actual ohms or in per unit (or per cent) based on the rating of the
individual apparatus. For use in the system impedance diagram the
*This term is defined in Chapter VI.
53
54 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
values so given must be converted either to ohms referred to a common
voltage or to perunit values on a common system base. The relation
ships among these several systems of units will now be discussed.
Perunit quantities. In the perunit system the various physical
quantities, such as current, voltage, power, and impedance, are ex
pressed as decimal fractions or multiples of base quantities. When the
apparatus base is used, the base quantities are the rated, or fullload,
values or are derived from them. Thus, for a 1,000kva., 66,OOOto
11,OOOvolt singlephase transformer, base power is taken as 1,000kva.
(or kw.); base voltage on the highvoltage side, as 66,000 volts; and
base voltage on the lowvoltage side, as 11,000volts. Base current on
the highvoltage side is 1,000/66 = 15.15 amp.; on the lowvoltage
side it is 1,000/11 = 90.9 amp.; both these values are fullload cur
rents. The base impedance of the highvoltage side is the ratio of
base voltage of that side to base current of that side, namely,
66,000/15.15 = 4,360 ohms. The base impedance of the lowvoltage
side is 11,000/90.9 = 121.5 ohms, which is (11,000/66,000)2 = 1/36
as great as the highvoltage value. These values are the load imped
ances required on the high and the lowvoltage sides of the transformer
to load it fully at rated voltage.
If the transformer is carrying a load of 500 kva. at 0.8 power factor
and at rated voltage, the apparent power is 500/1,000 = 0.50 per unit,
the active power is 400/1,000 = 0.40 per unit, the voltage on both
sides is 1.00 per unit, and the current on both sides is 0.50 per unit.
The perunit voltages of both windings are nearly equal, differing by
only a small impedance drop. The perunit currents of both windings
are nearly equal, differing by only a small exciting current.
The shortcircuit, or equivalent, impedance of a transformer re
ferred to one side is the same in per unit as when referred to the other
side, although different in ohms. For example, if the shortcircuit
impedance of the abovementioned transformer is 0.070 per unit, it is
0.070 X 4,360 = 305 ohms referred to the highvoltage side, or
0.070 X 121.5 = 8.5 ohms referred to the lowvoltage side.
Perunit impedances based on the apparatus rating are nearly the
same for all apparatus of the same general design though of different
voltage and kilovoltampere ratings, whereas the impedances in ohms
vary greatly with the rating. Hence typical values of impedance are
easier to tabulate, remember, and compare if expressed in per unit than
if expressed in ohms.
For conversion of selfimpedances from ohms to per unit and reverse,
the following formulas are used:
PERUNIT QUANTITIES 55
[2]
[3]
[4]
B
d h base voltage in volts
ase impe ance In 0 ms = .
base current In amperes
base voltage in volts
= 
(
baSe po\ver in vOltamperes)
base voltage in volts
(base voltage in volts)2
=
base power in voltamperes
(base voltage in kilovoltsj''
= [1]
base power in megavoltamperes
. . impedance in ohms
Perunit Impedance = b d h
ase impe ance In 0 ms
impedance in ohms X base power in megavoltamperes
(base voltage in kilovoltsj''
Impedance in ohms = perunit impedance X base impedance in ohms
perunit impedance X (base voltage in kilovolts)2
base power in megavoltamperes
For mutual impedances between circuits of different base voltages we
have, instead of eq. 1,
B
d base voltage 1 X base voltage 2
ase unpe ance = b
ase power
Although the foregoing relations have been derived for a singlephase
circuit (which may be regarded as one phase of a Yconnected three
phase circuit), they apply equally well to a whole threephase circuit
provided that the base voltage is the linetoline value (V3 times the
linetoneutral voltage) and the base power is the threephase value (3
times the power per phase). ' These factors cancel in the expression
(voltage)
2
jpower.
For use in a powersystem study, all impedances and other quantities
must be expressed on a common system base. An arbitrary base power
is selected; for example, 100 Mva. for a large power system, 50 or 20
Mva. for a smaller one. The base voltage for each portion of the net
work is usually the nominal voltage of that portion and, if not stated,
is thus understood. For portions of the network connected through
transformers, however, the ratio of base voltages should equal the turns
56 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
ratio of the transformer for the particular tap used, even if the turns
ratio differs from the ratio of nominal voltages. As eq. 2 shows, when
perunit impedances are changed from one base power (megavolt
ampere base) to another without change of base voltage, they vary
directly as the base power.
Percent quantities are 100 times the corresponding perunit quanti
ties. The decimal point must be watched in the multiplication or
division of percent quantities; for example, the product of a percent
impedance by a percent current is 100 times the proper percent volt
age drop.
As an alternative to putting all data into per unit on a system base,
they are sometimes expressed in ohms, volts, amperes, and so on,
referred to a common voltage, usually the nominal voltage of the major
portion of the transmission system. If this is done, impedances of the
lines of the major portion are left expressed in actual ohms, whereas
those of lines of other voltages are referred to the selected voltage by
multiplying them by the square of the turns ratio of the intervening
transformer. Impedances given in per unit on a given power base are
converted to ohms at the chosen voltage by eq. 3.
Representation of large synchronous machines. The representation
of various circuit elements in the impedance diagram will now be dis
cussed briefly. References will be given to sources of more complete
information.
Each generator or other large synchronous machine is commonly
represented for transientstability studies by its directaxis transient
reactance Xd' in series with a constantvoltage power source (Fig. 1).
The armature resistance of large machines is usually negligible. The
reactances of machines already built Of designed can usually be ob
tained from the manufacturer. The method of obtaining Xd' from a
shortcircuit oscillogram is described in Chapter XII, Vol. III. For
machines of minor importance average values of Xd' may be taken from
Table 2 of Chapter XII. More exact ways of representing synchro
.nous machines are also discussed in that chapter. .
Representation of transformers. Twocircuit transformers are rep
resented most accurately by an equivalent T circuit in which the series
arms represent the leakage impedances, and the shunt arm, the exciting
impedance. As a rule, the exciting current can be neglected in stabil
ity studies; if this is done, the T circuit is reduced to series impedance
Z (Fig. 2), equal in value to the shortcircuit, or equivalent, impedance
of the transformer. The value of this impedance is frequently given
on the name plate. It can be measured by means of a shortcircuit
test. The resistances of large transformers are usually negligible,
REPRESENTATION OF TRANSFORMERS 57
FIG. 2. Representation of a two
circuit transformer, exciting cur
rent neglected. V1, and V2 are the
primary and secondary voltages,
respectively. Z is the equivalent
impedance.
High Max. Percent Max. Percent Max.
Voltage, Low Reactance Low Reactance Low
Line to Line Voltage ~ Voltage ~ Voltage
(kv.) (kv.) Min. Max. (kv.) Min. Max. (kv.)
ranging from about 0.3 to 1.1%. Typical values of reactance are
given in Table 1. They depend principally upon the rated voltage:
the higher the voltage, the higher the reactance.
x'
"
FIG. 1. Representation of a gener
ator or other large synchronous
machine in a transientstability
study. Xd' is the directaxis tran
sient reactance, E/ is the internal
voltage "behind" this reactance,
and V is the terminal voltage.
TABLE 1
TYPICAL REACTANCES OF TWOWINDING POWER TRANSFORMERS
(500 KVA. PER PHASE AND OVER, 1 OR 3PHASE, 25 OR 60 c.e.s., 550. RISE)
(From Ref. la by permission of Westinghouse Electric Corporation)
Percent
Reactance
~
Min. Max.
0 15 15 4.5 7.0
16 25 15 5.5 8.0
26 37 15 6.0 8.0
38 50 25 6.5 9.0
51 73 25 7.0 10.0
74 92 34.5 7.5 10.5
93115 34.5 8.0 12.0
116138 37 8.5 13.0
139161 50 9.0 14.0
162:96 50 10.0 15.0
197230 50 11.0 16.0
25
37
46
69
73
73
92
92
92
6.5
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.5
11.5
12.5
9.0
10.5
11.0
12.5
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
73
92
115
138
161
161
9.0 14.0
10.0 15.5
10.5 17.0
11.5 18.0
12.5 19.0
14.0 20.0
Threecircuit transformers are represented, with exciting current
neglected, by Y circuits (Fig. 3) such that the resistance of each
branch is the resistance of the corresponding winding, and the sum of
the reactances of each pair of branches equals the shortcircuit react
ance between the corresponding pair of windings with the remaining
winding open." 5 Thus
Xl +X
2
= X
l 2
Xl +X3 = X13
X
2
+ X
3
= X
23
[5a]
[5b]
[5cJ
58
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
whence
Xl c= !(X
12
+ X
13
 X
23
)
X
2
=!(X
I 2
+X
23
 X
13
)
X
3
= !(X
I 3
+ X
23
 X
12
)
[6a]
[6b]
l6c]
Frequently the reactance of one arm of the Y, as determined by
eqs. 6, is found to be negative. t
For estimating purposes the reactance X
l
2. between the two main
windings of a threewinding transformer may be considered equal to
the reactance of a twowinding
transformer having the same kilo
R
1
+jX1 h tV
2
voltampere and voltage ratings
a: (Table 1). The reactances X
13
I
3 1J ~ ~ and X23 between the main wind
v} ings and the tertiary winding
cannot be estimated accurately
becauseof the wide range in these
reactances in transformers of dif
ferent designs.!"
FIG. 3. Representation of a three...
circuit transformer, exciting current Transformers of 4. or 5 circuits.
neglected. See Refs. 6 and 7, respectively.
Autotransformers are repre
sented in the same manner as transformers with separate windings.
The impedances used in the diagram are those between circuit ter
minals, not those between parts of the winding. The reactance of an
autotransformer in per cent (based on the rated kilovoltamperes de
livered) can'be estimated by multiplying the reactance of a twowind
ing transformer from Table 1 by the ratio, Ia
rated high voltage  rated lowvoltage
rated high voltage
Autotransformers can have very small reactances if the voltage ratio
is closeto unity.
[This circumstance causes no difficulty in an algebraic solution, but on an ac.
calculating board (discussedlater in this chapter) an inordinately large capacitance
is required for representing a small negative reactance. This difficulty may be
avoided either by combining the negative reactance with whatever positive re
actance may be in series with it or by representing it by capacitive reactance in
series with inductive reactance that is smaller than the capacitive reactance by the
amount of the required negative reactance.
TRANSMISSION LINES AND CABLES 59
Symmetrical banks of three singlephase transformers, that is, Y or A
connections of identical transformers, are represented in the single
phase impedance diagram as one singlephase transformer, the perunit
impedance of which, based on the kilovoltampere rating of the bank,
is equal to the perunit impedance of one transformer on its own
kilovoltampere rating. Threephase transformers ~ r e represented in
similar fashion. The noload phase displacement between primary
and secondary circuits (0 or 180
0
for a ~  ~ or Y Y connection, 30
for a ~  y or y  ~ connection) ordinarily can be and is disregarded.
Regulating transformers "for control of ratio, phase shift, or both. See
Refs. Ib, 8, and 9.
Transmission lines and cables are represented by their nominal or
equivalent 7r circuits.l!
In the nominal 7r circuit (Fig. 4a) the series branch has an impedance
equal to the total series impedance Z per phase of the line, and the
z
II ~ y tanh(...{ZY'2
2" VZf/2
~ ~ ~
(a) Nominalr (b) Equivalent 1r
FIG. 4. Circuits for representing transmission lines and cables.
shunt branch at each end has an admittance equal to half the shunt
admittance Yof the line to neutral. Here Z = zl and Y = st. where l
is the length of the line and z and yare the series impedance and shunt
admittance per unit length. The series impedance consists of resist
ance and inductive reactance; the shunt admittance consists practi
cally of capacitive susceptance only, as the shunt conductance of
power lines is negligible.
In the equivalent 1r circuit (Fig. 4b), the impedance of the series
branch is that of the nominal 1T' multiplied by a correction factor,
sinh vZ Eiv'ZY  Eiy'Zf
VZY 2VZY
1 +Zy (Zy)2 (Zy)3
= 6+120+ 5040+ [7a]
,
and the admittance of each shunt branch is that of the nominal 1r
60 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
multiplied by another correction factor,
E
iVZ'i/2
_ EiVZ'i/2
(E
i YZY
/
2
+ EiVZ'i/2) v'ZY/2
tanh (V"ZYj2)
= 
v'ZY/2
The correction factors can be found easily by use of Woodruff's
charts. 12
The equivalent 1r is an exact representation of a line at a particular
frequency, whereas the nominal 1r is an approximation, the use of
which is justified only if the correction factors are nearly 1, as is true if
Zy = zyl2 1, hence for short lines. As a general rule, the nominal e
is accurate enough for 60c.p.s. openwire lines not more than 100miles
long. Longer lines may be represented by an equivalent 1r or by two
or more nominal 1r'S in tandem. Very short lines have negligible
shunt admittance and can be represented by their series impedance
only.
Each part of a composite line, such as an underground cable in series
with an aerial line, may be represented by a 1r. By means of one or
more y  ~ conversions, the circuit can be reduced to one 1r, usually
an unsymmetrical one.
When several linesare connected tothesame bus,the shunt capacitances
at that end of all the 1r circuits of these lines are in parallel and may be
replaced by one capacitance from the bus to neutral. If one or more
lines are disconnected in the course of a study, the value of this capaci
tance should be reduced accordingly.
Although T circuits could be used instead of 1r circuits, the 1r circuits
are preferable because they require only one series impedance per line
and one shunt capacitance per bus, whereas the T circuits require two
series impedances and one shunt capacitance per line.
The constants of lines may be found by measurement 13 or by calcu
lation. In calculation the length of the line, found from a map or
other record, is multiplied by the constants per unit length. The
constants of cables are best found from the manufacturer, but they'
may be estimated from published tables.
1d
14
The constants of aerial
lines can be found accurately from tables. They depend upon (1)
the frequency, (2) the size and kind of conductor, and (3) the spacing
between conductors. The series resistance depends principally upon
size and kind of conductor and, to a lesser degree, upon frequency.
The series inductive reactance depends upon all the foregoing factors.
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
61
It can be found most simply as the sum of two terms, one of which
(equal to the reactance ascribable to the flux inside a lft, radius)
depends upon frequency and size and kind of conductor; and the
other, upon frequency and spacing. t The shunt capacitive reactance
can be found in like manner. Reference Ic has suitable tables for
finding series and shunt reactances by this method. For estimates
the series inductive reactance of a 60c.p.s. aerial line may be taken as
0.8 ohm per mile, and the' shunt capacitive susceptance, as 5 micromhos
per mile. For other frequencies the values are proportional.
Mutual impedance and admittance between parallel lines are negligi
ble for positive sequence.
Representation of loads. As the loads on a power system vary with
the time of day and of year and from one year to another, one or more
particular load conditions must be selected for study; for example, the
annual peak load and the minimum load may be taken. Estimated
future loads are often used. The connected generator and trans
former capacity and other features of system operation will depend
upon the loads assumed. Loads are assumed to be lumped on the
busses of major stations and substations. They should be expressed
as vector power P +jQ, where P is the active power, and Q the re
active power. Each load is then represented by a shunt admittance,
y  P +jQ [8]
 V
2
where V is the voltage across the load. Ordinarily, the voltages used
in calculating the load admittances must be estimated. Later, the
admittances of the important loads can be revised, if so desired, by
using more accurate values of voltage.
Small tapped loads on transmission lines may be removed and ap
portioned between the two ends of the line in inverse proportion to the
line impedances between the tap and the ends.
Representation of faults. A threephase short circuit is represented
by connecting the point of fault to the neutral bus. The representa
tion of other types of fault is discussed in Chapter VI.
Miscellaneous equipment. Closed circuit breakers and switches,
current transformers, and busses have negligible impedance on high
voltage systems and, therefore, are disregarded. Similarly, such shunt
elements as potential transformers, lightning arresters, and coupling
tThis method of tabulating reactance of lines was originated by W. A. Lewis and
was published first in Ref. 2d.
If the three distances between conductors are unequal, the geometric mean of the
distances or the arithmetic mean of the corresponding reactance terms is used.
62 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
capacitors have impedances so high that they are considered open
circuits.
Representation of remote portions of the system. In studies of part
of a large interconnected system it is neither necessary nor feasible to
represent in equal detail all stations and lines of the entire system.
Outlying portions can be represented by equivalent circuits. A
remote portion connected at only one point to the portion being studied
can be replaced, according to Thevenin's theorem, by an impedance in
series with a constantvoltage power source. The impedance is found
by network reduction (discussed later in this chapter) or by a knowl
edge of the shortcircuit kilovoltamperes at the point of connection.
The impedance may be assumed to be pure reactance, in which case
the equivalent circuit islike that of a generator (Fig. 1). The voltage
of the source may be assumed as 1 per unit. A remote portion of the
network connected at two points to the' portion being studied can
be represented by a power source and a Y circuit.
The inertia constant assigned to the generator of each of these
equivalent circuits should equal the total of the inertia constants of all
the machines therein (for reasons discussed later in this chapter) and,
in the absence of more definite information, may be calculated from an
average value of H (Figs. 1 and 2, Chapter II) and the known aggre
gate generating capacity. If the total inertia is large and loosely
coupled to the portion of the network being studied, it may be con..
sidered infinite with little error. The assumption of infiriite inertia for
a remote portion of the system renders the computation of swing
curves unnecessary for the equivalent machines representing such
portions.
Check list of data required for transientstability study.
Generators
Nameplate rating
Directaxis transient reactance
Kinetic energy at rated speed (or moment of inertia and speed),
including prime mover (see Chapter II)
Voltage limits
Grounding
Negativesequence resistance and reactance]
Zerosequence reactance
Required only for studies including ground faults. See Chapter VI.
[Required only for studies involving unbalanced faults.
DATA FOR TRANSIENTSTABILITY STUDY 63
Transformers, twocircuit
Nameplate rating
Equivalent resistance and reactance
Turn ratio normally used
Available taps and tapchanging equipment
Connections
Grounding
Transformers, multicircuit
Items listed for twocircuit transformers
Resistance of each winding ra common kilovolt
Reactances between each pair of windings ampere base
Kilovoltampere rating of each winding
Reactors
Resistance
Reactance
Transmission Zines and coble
Series resistance and inductive reactance of each line section
Shunt capacitance or capacitive susceptance of each line section,
except those for which its effect is obviously negligible
Zerosequence resistance, reactance, and capacitance
Synchronous condensers and large synchronous motors
Same data as for generators; however, kilovoltampere rating of
condensers may be different for lagging current than for leading
current
Loads
Active and reactive power for each condition to be studied
Voltage limits
Circuit breakers (see Chapters VIII and XI, Vol. II)
Interrupting time
Reclosing time }f t t I d
S
 I I th I t 1 au oma IC rec osmg IS use
mg epo e or reepo e opera Ion
Protective relays (see Chapter IX, Vol. II)
Types and settings
Required only for studies including ground faults, See Chapter VI.
64
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
The alternatingcurrent calculating board. Mter the required data
have been compiled and the impedance diagram has been drawn, the
network must be solved in order to find the magnitudes and initial
phase positions of the internal voltages of all the synchronous ma
chines. Subsequently, during the determination of swing curves, the
network must be solved repeatedly to obtain the power output of all
the machines when their angular positions and internal voltages are
known.
Networks may be solved by two principal methods, the calculating
board method and the algebraic method. Calculatingboard solutions
are to be preferred on account of their rapidity and ease when the num
ber of machines considered is three or more.
The calculating board is essentially a means of representing an elec
tric power network to scale. A threephase network is represented on
the board on a singlephase basis. One hundred volts on the board
may represent, for example, 100 kv. line to line (57.7 kv. line to neu
tral) on the power system, and 100 watts on the board may represent
50 Mw. threephase (16.7 Mw. per phase) on the system. The scales
for voltage and power are then 1 : 1,000 and 1 : 500,000, respectively.
The scales of current and of impedance follow automatically from the
scales chosen for voltage and for power, In this particular example,
1 amp. on the board would represent 16.7 X 10
6
/ 57.7 X 10
3
= 289
amp. on the power system, and 100 ohms on the board would represent
57,700/289 = 200 ohms per phase (Y basis) on the system.
The alternatingcurrent calculating board, also known as a network
analyzer or network calculator, consists of an assemblage of adjustable
resistors, reactors, and capacitors; a number .of sources of ac. voltage
adjustable both.in phase and in magnitude; provisions for connecting
the foregoing units together in any desired manner to form a network;
and instruments for measuring scalar and vector values of voltage,
current, and power anywhere in the network. The instruments must
be so designed that insertion of them does not appreciably change
conditions in the network. A modern ac. calculating board is shown
in Fig. 5.
In using the ac. board in a stability study, the network is first set
up to scale, the generators being represented ordinarily by their
directaxis transient reactances in series with power sources. Next
the phase and magnitude of the voltages of the several power sources
and the impedances of the loads are adjusted to represent the desired
normal or prefault operating condition, with respect to machine out
puts, terminal voltages, and similar factors. The fault is then applied
at the desired point. If it is a threephase fault, it is represented
THE ALTERNATINGCURRENT CALCULATING BOARD 65
simply by a short circuit on the network; if it is an unsymmetrical
fault, it is represented either by a shunt impedance or by a connection
betweenthe sequence networks (to be discussed in Chapter VI). The
voltages of the power sources (representing voltages behind transient
reactance, which are ordinarily assumed constant) are readjusted, if
necessary, to restore them to their prefault values. It is desirable,
however, that the power sources have such good voltage regulation
that readjustment is unnecessary, or at least small. Then the power
FIG. 5. Amodern alternatingcurrent calculating board (by courtesyofthe General
Electric Company).
output of each machine is read by means of a wattmeter. From these
readings the accelerating power is computed, and from it the angular
change of each machine during the first time interval is found by
methods already discussed. The angular changes so found are then
reproduced on the calculating board by turning the angleadjusting
dials of the powersources. After this has beendone, a newset of power
readings is taken, and so on. The clearing of a fault or any other
switching operation is represented by an appropriate change of con
nections on the board at the proper time in the run. The run is con
tinued, the swing curves being plotted as it progresses, until it is ap
parent whether all the machines will remain in synchronism.
From the foregoing description of the use of an ac. calculating
66 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
board in a stability study, it should be obvious that a directcurrent
calculating board could not be used for the same purpose. The correct
representation of phase relations is allimportant.
Alternatingcurrent calculating boards are owned and operated by a
number of leading electrical manufacturers, consulting engineering
firms, engineering colleges, and, both publicly and privately owned
electricpower utilities.
22
Some of these boards are available for hire.
The two most widely used types will now be described.
Description of General Electric AC. Network Analyzer.
17
, 21
The ac. calculating board shown in Fig. 5 operates at a frequency of
480 c.p.s, ~ and has a nominal, or base, voltage of 50 volts and a nomi
nal, or base, current of 50 rna.** Consequently, the base power is
2.5 watts, and the base impedance is 1,000 ohms. All adjusting dials
and instrument scales are marked in percentages of the base quantities.
Generator units. There are a number of power sources for supplying
singlephase voltages of adjustable phase and magnitude, which are
used principally for representing generators. Each generator unit
consists of two machines, a phase shifter and a singlephase induction
voltage regulator. The phase shifter has a threephase stator wind
ing, which receives 220volt, 480c.p.s. power from a motorgenerator
set, and a singlephase rotor winding, which delivers power at constant
voltage and adjustable phase to the voltage regulator. The phase
shifter provides adjustment of phase through an unlimited angle, and
the voltage regulator affords adjustment of voltage magnitude from
oto 250% of the base voltage. The phase and magnitude adjustments
do not affect each other, nor are the adjustments greatly affected by
load. The series inductive reactance of the generator unit is compen
sated by series capacitive reactance. As a result, the voltage regula
tion at full load is only 2%, and the phase shift produced by rated
current at zero power factor is only 1
0
This small voltage regulation
is very convenient in stability studies where the voltages of the power
sources represent known constant voltages behind transient reactances
of synchronous machines because the angular positions of the several
machines can be varied without the necessity of readjusting the volt
age magnitudes. Furthermore, the phase and magnitude of each
voltage agree closely with the respective dial settings.
In studies of normal powersystem operation the voltagemagnitude
,The board frequency need not be the same as the frequency of the power
system to be studied.
**The nominal voltage is approximately the average voltage (to neutral) of the
board circuits, and the nominal current is approximately the average current in the
principal board circuits.
GENERAL ELECTRIC AC. BOARD
67
adjustment simulates adjustment of the excitation of the represented
machine, and the phase adjustment corresponds to adjustment of the
governor of the prime mover. Advancing the phase increases the
power output, and retarding the phase decreases it, unless, of course,
the angle of maximum power on the powerangle curve isexceeded.
Lineimpedance units. There are a large number of lineimpedance
units, each consisting of resistors and three tapped reactors perma
nently connected in series. These units are used for representing the
impedances of transmission lines, transformers, reactors, and ma
chines, and other low impedances. Information on the range of
resistance and reactance, size of steps, current capacity, and so on
of the lineimpedance units and other circuit elements is given in
Table 2.
As the impedance units constitute a large portion of the bulk and
weight of any ac. calculating board, it is important that they be made
small. On the other hand, it is desirable that the reactors have a
reasonably low ratio of resistance to reactance so that they can rep
resent sufficiently well transformers, reactors, and machines having a
low ratio of resistance to reactance. Furthermore, the reactance
should be almost independent of the magnitude of current in the
reactor. These requirements for reactors tend to make them large.
The problem of conflicting requirements has been solved by the use of
low base power, a higher frequency than 60 c.p.s., and highgrade
magnetic material for the cores of the reactors.
The resistance of the line reactors ranges from 3% of the reactance
when the reactance is set at 70% of the base value to 8% at a setting
of 0.2% of the base. The resistance of the reactors is not negligible;
therefore an allowance for it (taken as 5% of the reactance setting)
should be made in setting the associated resistors.
Loadimpedance units. The loadimpedance units differ from the
lineimpedance units chiefly in that they have a higher impedance.
They are used to represent loads or other circuits of high impedance.
The resistor and reactor can be connected either in series or in parallel
with one another. The parallel connection affords easier adjustment
of the loads because thus the adjustments of active power and of re
active power are nearly independent of each other. The series con
nection is used for small loads, for loads of unity or zero power factor,
and for representing high impedances other than loads. For rep
resenting a load of leading power factor, one of the capacitor units
(mentioned in the next paragraph) is connected in parallel with a load
impedance unit.
Capacitors are used chiefly for representing capacitance of cables
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
T
A
B
L
E
2
C
I
R
C
U
I
T
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A

C
.
N
E
T
W
O
R
K
A
N
A
L
Y
'
Z
E
B
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
a
t
S
c
h
e
n
e
c
t
a
d
y
i
n
1
9
3
7
N
u
m
b
e
r
"
R
a
n
g
e
t
S
i
z
e
o
f
S
t
e
p
s
]
T
o
l
e
r
a
n
c
e
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
S
a
f
e
V
a
l
u
e
s
t
c 0
0
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
b
o
u
t
2
%
.
.
1
,
0
0
0
%
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0

2
5
0
%
.
.
.
.
.
.
S
m
o
o
t
h
P
h
a
s
e
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
U
n
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
.
.
.
.
S
m
o
o
t
h
L
i
n
e
i
m
p
e
d
a
n
c
e
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
5
0
S
t
h
{
T
a
p
p
e
d
r
e
s
i
s
t
o
r
1
%
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
}
5
0
0
%
1
%
1
R
e
s
i
s
t
o
r
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0


5
1
%
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
m
o
o
.
.
.
.
S
t
h
.
t
3
~
0
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
o
r
2
5
0
v
o
t
a
g
e
m
o
o
r
e
S
I
S
o
r
0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
R
e
a
c
t
o
r
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0

8
1
%
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
{
1
%
a
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
.
.
.
.
}
0
.
2
%
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
~
t
t
5
0
0
%
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
o
r
1
2
5
%
v
o
l
t
a
g
e
o
a
a
n
y
c
u
r
r
e
n
.
.
.
.
.
.
C
.
{
O
O
0

1
1
0
%
}
l
o
t
1
0
1
a
p
a
c
l
t
o
r
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4
1
\
c
.
6
0
0
0
1
1
0
/
0




_
.
_
.
1
2
5
%
v
o
l
t
a
g
e
.
.
.
.
~
,
/
0
A
f
{
8
8
5


1
1
5
%
.
.
.
.
.
1
%
}
1
0
1
d
u
t
o
t
r
a
n
s
o
r
m
e
r
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
2
6
9
.
5

1
3
0
.
5
%
.
0
.
5
%
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
0
5
O
O
%
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
a
n
1
2
5
%
v
o
l
t
a
g
e
M
u
t
u
a
l
r
e
a
c
t
o
r
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
0
0
%
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
a
n
d
1
2
5
%
v
o
l
t
a
g
e
*
T
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
i
r
c
u
i
t
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
v
a
r
i
e
s
o
n
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
r
s
b
u
i
l
t
b
y
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
m
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
e
r
.
2
2
t
I
n
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
b
a
s
e
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
i
e
s
(
5
0
v
o
l
t
s
,
0
.
0
5
0
a
m
p
.
,
1
,
0
0
0
o
h
m
s
,
0
.
0
0
1
m
h
o
)
.
L
o
a
d
i
m
p
e
d
a
n
c
e
s
.
R
e
s
i
s
t
o
r
.
R
e
a
c
t
o
r
.
5
0
0

1
,
6
1
0
%
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0

1
,
6
0
5
%
.
.
.
.
{
T
a
p
p
e
d
r
e
s
i
s
t
o
r
1
%
}
5
0
0
%
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
o
r
1
2
5
%
v
o
l
t
a
g
e
S
m
o
o
t
h
.
.
.
.
S
m
o
o
t
h
r
e
s
i
s
t
o
r
3
%
.
{
1
%
a
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
}
5
0
0
%
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
o
r
1
2
5
%
v
o
l
t
a
g
e
5
%
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
%
a
t
a
n
y
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
.
0
0
o e

~ .

3
.
.
.
.
.
.
o Z ~ Z t
?

j
~ ~ ~ ~ 0
0
GENERAL ELECTRIC AC. BOARD 69
and transmission lines. They are used also for representing capacitors
and, in steadystate studies, for synchronous condensers.
Autotransformers of two designs are provided, one of which will buck
or boost the voltage by 1%steps up to a maximum of 15% of the
primary voltage; the other, by 0.5% steps up to 30.5%. They are
used for representing transformers whose actual turns ratios differ
from the nominal ratios on which the circuit impedances are calculated.
Thus they are valuable for representing transformers of adjustable
ratio, and one of them must be included in any loop around which the
product of all transformer ratios is not unity; for example, if two sys
tems of different voltage are connected through two transformers of
unequal turns ratio. The position of zero buck or boost represents
the nominal voltage ratio.
Mutual transformers of ratio 1:1 are used chiefly for representing
mutual reactance between parallel transmission lines that are not con
nected together at either end. They are used also in various equiva
lent circuits. These transformers are not adjustable, but adjustable
mutual impedance is obtained by shunting one winding of the trans
former with an adjustable impedance (lineimpedance unit).
Connections. A scheme is necessary whereby the foregoing circuit
units can be readily connected together in any desired way to form a
network representing a particular power system. On the board shown
in Fig. 5 each circuit unit terminates in a pair of flexible cords, each
bearing a singlepole plug. Insertion of these plugs into horizontally
adjacent jacks of the vertical jack panels forms an electrical connection
between them. The "busses" formed by groups of adjacent plugs
can be placed in the same relative positions on the jack panel as on the
connection diagram, thus greatly facilitating the checking of connec
tions. The lowest row of jacks is used as a ground, or neutral, bus,
and the plugs inserted in this row are connected even though not
adjacent. As an indication of polarity, one cord of each circuit unit
is colored green, the other yellow. tt A positive wattmeter reading
denotes power flow from the yellow to the green cord; a negative
reading, from the green to the yellow. Like rules hold for the sign of
the varmeter reading and the direction of lagging reactive power.
Jumper circuits are used to form zeroimpedance ties which can be
metered. They are useful in .representing bustie breakers, terminals
of 7r circuits representing transmission lines, connections between the
sequence networks for representing faults (see Chapter VI), and so on.
ttThe mutual transformers have two pairs of cords, one for the primary winding,
the other for the secondary. Likecolored cords have like polarity. The auto
transformers have three cords, one of which, colored black, is usually plugged
to the ground bus. The green cord connects to the movable tap.
70 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
Instruments. The system of making measurements is one of the
most crucial features of an ac. calculating board. It must satisfy
the following requirements:
1. It must be possible to insert the instruments anywhere in the
network without appreciably altering conditions in the network.
The voltampere burden of the instruments determines the minimum
permissiblebase power and thus fixes the size and weight of the entire
board.
2. Because of the large number of readings required in most
powersystemstudies, the instruments should be fast in response and
easily readable so that an operator can take readings all day without
eyestrain.
3. The instruments must be suitable for a variety of measure
ments: scalar values of voltage, current, active power, and reactive
power; and vector values of voltage and current in both rectangular
and polar forms.
It has been found desirable to have two sets of instruments: (1)
the master instruments, meeting the requirements enumerated above,
and (2) instruments permanently connected to each power source.
This second set of instruments expedites the adjustment of the power
sources. The burden of these instruments is not a matter of such
concern as that of the master instruments.
The master instruments of the board shown in Fig. 5 consist of a volt
meter, an ammeter, and a wattmetervarmeter, In order to make the
burden of these instruments on the network negligibly small despite
the low power level used there, they are supplied with current and
voltage through two stabilizedfeedback vacuumtube amplifiers.P
For good legibility each instrument has an 8inch translucent scale on
which a spot of light serves as a pointer. The response of these in
struments is rapid. Their overall, accuracy, including the voltage
divider, the current shunts, and the amplifiers, is within O.5% of full
scale.
A phase shifter is provided for use with the wattmeter in the meas
urement of vector current and voltage, as will be described presently.
The following switches, located within reach of the operator, are
used in association with the instruments:
Akey switch is provided for each circuit unit on the board. When
any of these switches is thrown, all three instruments are connected
to the selected circuit unit and indicate simultaneously.
The voltageselector switch determines whether the voltage
furnished to the voltmeter and wattmeter comes from (a) across the
GENERAL ELECTRIC AC. BOARD 71
circuit unit, as for reading line drops and losses, (b) from one side of
the circuit unit to the ground bus, (c) from the other side of the cir
cuit unit to ground, (d) from either side of the circuit unit to a cord
that can be plugged to any desired point of the network, or (e) from
the instrument phase shifter.
The currentselector switch makes it possible to select current
from the circuit unit, total ground current, or current from the in
strument phase shifter.
The reversing switch is thrown so as to make the wattmeter read
upscale. The reading is recorded with + or  sign, according to
,the position of this switch.
The wattvar switch is used to make the wattmetervarmeter
read either active or reactive power. This switch is also used in
reading vector current and voltage.
A sevenposition rangeselector switch provides for the most com
monly used combinations of voltage and current ranges: voltage,
100% and 200% of base; current, 20%, 100%,500%, and 2,000%.
There is an auxiliary switch for selecting the lessused lowvoltage
ranges: 20% and 40%.
Vector measurements. To measure current in rectangular form, the
wattmetervarmeter is furnished with the current to be measured and
with 100% voltage from the instrument phase shifter, which is set at
the desired reference angle (usually 0). The inphase and quadrature
components of current are equal to the watt and var readings, respec
tively. To read current in polar form, the phase shifter is turned until
the var reading is zero; then the angle is read on the phaseshifter dial.
The watt reading is the current magnitude. Vector values of voltage
are read in the same way as currents except that the wattmeter is
supplied with the voltage to be measured and with 100% current from
the phase shifter.
Instruments on the generator units. In addition to the centrally
located master instruments, there are a wattmetervarmeter and a
voltmeter at the terminals of each power source. The wattmeter
varmeter has voltage ranges of 150% and 300% and current ranges of
100% and 400%. It is changed from a wattmeter to a varmeter by
substituting a capacitor for the usual resistor in the potential circuit.
The voltmeter can be connected to any point in the network where the
generator is expected to regulate voltage.
Power supply. Threephase, 480c.p.s., 440volt power is supplied
to the board from a remotecontrolled motorgenerator set consisting
of a motor, a 3kva. alternator, an exciter, and a phase balancer. The
phase balancer is used for obtaining balanced threephase voltages
72
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
Primary
FIG. 6. Voltage vector diagram of one
phase of the threephase voltage regulators
of a generator unit of the Westinghouse AC.
Network Calculator. OL is the locus of
the output voltage.
(required so that the magnitude of the voltage of each power source
shall be independent of its phase) in spite of the essentially singlephase
loading.
Between the generator and the power sources on the board is a bank
of autotransformers with taps for normal voltage and for 50% and 25%
of normal voltage. A tapselector switch on the instrument desk
enables the operator to reduce the voltage of all power sources simulta
neously if this is necessary to avoid overloading any of the board
circuits, for example, during the period that a fault is represented on
the power system.
Arrangement. The instrument desk, at which the operator is seated
in Fig. 5, is at the center, flanked on both sides by the jack panels and
the tables holding the flexible cords. Above the instrument panel and
jack panels are the generator units. The wings on each end of the
board (only one of which shows in Fig. 5) contain the line and load
impedance units, capacitors, and autotransformers, each in a removable
drawer. The board is so arranged that the units requiring the most
frequent adjustment are closest to the operator.
Description of Westinghouse AC. Network Calculator.
19
,20 The
Westinghouse calculating board differs from the General Electric
board, which has been described, chiefly in the following features:
The frequency is 440 c.p.s.
The nominal voltage and current are 100 volts and 1 amp., respec
tively.
Each generator unit consists of two threephase induction voltage
regulators and a phase shifter. The threephase secondary windings
of the two induction regulators
are in series, and the rotors are
mechanically coupled so as to
give them equal but opposite
angular displacements when the
voltage handle is turned. Con
sequently, the threephase out
put voltages of the pair of
regulators are constant in phase
as the magnitude is varied.
(See Fig. 6.)tt The output of the regulators goes to the phase shifter.
The output voltage of the phase shifter has three ranges: 0 to 100, 0
to 200, and 0 to 400 volts.
ttEarly models had only one threephase voltage regulator ahead of the phase
shifter. Consequently, the voltage adjustment changed the phase also, requiring a
compensating movement of the phase shifter.
WESTINGHOUSE AC. BOARD 73
For representing the internal reactance of each generator there is a
special reactor having a lower resistance than the line and load reactors.
Each generator is provided with a voltmeter, an ammeter, and a
wattmeter. These instruments have auxiliary pointers that can be
preset manually to show the desired operating conditions. The volt
meter can be switched to read either the internal voltage or the
terminal voltage of the generator.
The impedance units are marked in ohms at 440 c.p.s. (equal to per
cent impedance when 100ohms is used as base); the autotransformers,
in percentage; and the capacitors, in microfarads. Additional in
formation on the various circuit elements is given in Table 3.
Each load unit is equipped with a tapped autotransformer, called a
loadadjuster, by means of which the active and reactive power of each
load can be adjusted simultaneously without changing the power
factor of the load. Usually the settings of the load resistor and
reactor are calculated for an estimated bus voltage (say, 100%). If
the actual load voltage differs from the estimated value, the load unit
does not consume the correct value of power, because power in a
constant impedance varies as the square of the voltage. By means of
the autotransformer, however, the voltage on the resistor and reactor
can be adjusted to 100% even though the bus voltage has another
value, It is merely necessary to set the autotransformer tap to corre
spond to the measured bus voltage. The taps are in 1%steps. The
function of the load adjusters on the board is analogous to that of
feedervoltage regulators on an actual power system.
The masterinstruments include a set for measuring scalar values and
a set for measuring vector values. The scalar instruments consist of a
voltmeter, an ammeter, and a wattmetervarmeter. They are sup
plied with voltage and current through two negativefeedback
vacuumtube amplifiers. The voltage ranges are 125 and 250 volts;
the current ranges are 0.06, 0.2, 0.6, 2, and 6 amp.
The vector instruments are an ammeter (ranges 1 and 3 amp.) and a
voltmeter (ranges 50 and 500 volts). Each is a twocoil dynamo
meter instrument, one coil of which is inserted in the network, and the
other, consuming the greater part of the power for actuating the in
strument, is fed from one or the other phase of the twophase secondary
winding of an instrument phase shifter. For reading current or volt
age in rectangular form, the phase shifter is set on the desired reference
position (usually 0), the field coils of the ammeter and voltmeter are
connected to one secondary winding of the phase shifter, and the "in
phase" component is read; then the field coils are connected to the
other winding, and the "quadrature" component is read. For reading
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
T
A
B
L
E
3
C
m
c
U
I
T
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
W
E
S
T
I
N
G
H
O
U
S
E
A

C
.
N
E
T
W
O
l
U
t
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
O
R
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
a
t
E
a
s
t
P
i
t
t
s
b
u
r
g
h
i
n
1
9
4
2
*
N
u
m
b
e
r
f
R
a
n
g
e
S
i
z
e
o
f
S
t
e
p
s
T
o
l
e
r
a
n
c
e
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
S
a
f
e
V
a
l
u
e
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
8
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0

4
0
0
v
o
l
t
s
.
.
.
S
m
o
o
t
h
u
n
d
e
r
2
%
.
P
h
a
s
e
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
U
n
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
.
.
.
.
S
m
o
o
t
h
G
e
n
.
r
e
a
c
t
o
r
s
O
O
W
R
/
X
)
1
8
(
)

4
(
)
(
)
o
h
m
s
:
H
!
%
o
f
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
.
.
R
e
a
c
t
o
r
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0

2
,
4
0
0
o
h
m
s
.
S
m
o
o
t
h
j
.
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
o
r
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4
8
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Q

4
.
1
0
p
.
f
.
.
.
.
.
O
.
O
I
,
.
"
f
.
A
u
t
o
t
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
e
r
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
6
8
0

1
2
4
.
5
%
.
.
.
0
.
5
%
.
M
u
t
u
a
l
r
e
a
c
t
o
r
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
L
i
n
e
i
m
p
e
d
a
n
c
e
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
R
e
s
i
s
t
o
r
.
R
e
a
c
t
o
r
.
L
o
a
d
i
m
p
e
d
a
n
c
e
s
.
R
e
s
i
s
t
o
r
.
1
5
2
.
0

3
9
9
h
{
(
o

I
O
O
)
0
.
2
o
h
m
.
.
.
.
}
1
1
0
1
f
t
t
o
I
D
S
.
.
.
(
1
0
0

3
9
9
)
1
o
h
m
.
.
.
.
0
B
e
m
g
.
.
0

3
0
0
o
h
m
s
.
.
.
S
m
o
o
t
h
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
!
%
o
f
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
.
.
4
8
.
O
3
9
9
0
h
m
{
(
0


1
,
0
0
0
)
2
o
h
m
.
.
.
.
}
1
1
0
1
f
t
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

,
o
s
.
(
1
,
0
0
0

3
,
9
9
0
)
1
0
o
h
m
2
/
0
0
s
e
l
n
g
.
.
1
!
%
o
f
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
.
.
4
0
0
v
o
l
t
s
,
3
a
m
p
.
3
.
0
a
m
p
.
o
r
v
o
l
t
s
2
2
0
v
o
l
t
s
{
(
0

9
.
8
o
h
m
s
)
3
.
0
a
m
p
.
(
1
0

9
9
.
8
o
h
m
s
)
2
.
3
a
m
p
.
(
1
0
0

3
9
9
o
h
m
s
)
1
.
2
a
m
p
.
3
.
0
a
m
p
.
o
r
2
2
0
v
o
l
t
s
2
2
0
v
o
l
t
s
1
(
0

8
o
h
m
s
)
3
.
0
a
m
p
.
(
1
0

9
8
o
h
m
s
)
2
.
3
a
m
p
.
(
1
0
0

2
9
8
o
h
m
s
)
1
.
2
a
m
p
.
l
(
3
0
0

9
9
8
o
h
m
s
)
0
.
4
8
a
m
p
.
(
1
,
0
0
0

3
,
9
9
0
o
h
m
s
)
0
.
2
3
a
m
p
.
3
.
0
a
m
p
.
o
r
2
2
0
v
o
l
t
s
2
2
0
v
o
l
t
s
2
2
0
v
o
l
t
s
,
3
.
0
a
m
p
.
3
.
0
a
m
p
.
0
0
o Z Z t
r
j
o ;
.
0
0
0
*
R
e
p
l
a
c
i
n
g
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
o
r
b
u
i
l
t
i
n
1
9
2
9
.
H
a
s
t
w
o
i
n
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
d
e
s
k
s
.
t
T
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
i
r
c
u
i
t
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
v
a
r
i
e
s
o
n
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
o
r
s
b
u
i
l
t
b
y
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
m
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
e
r
.
2
2
v
a
l
u
e
s
a
r
e
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
b
y
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
i
x
e
d
a
i
r

g
a
p
r
e
a
c
t
o
r
s
i
n
s
e
r
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
a
v
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
a
i
r

g
a
p
r
e
a
c
t
o
r
.
PROCEDURE FOR USING CALCULATING BOARD 75
current or voltage in polar form, the field coils are connected to the
"inphase" winding, the phase shifter is turned until the instrument
reads zero, and the angle is read on the phaseshifter dial; the field
coils are then connected to the "quadrature" winding, and the magni
tude of current is read on the ammeter, or the voltage on the volt
meter.
The master instruments are connected to the desired circuit element
by means of a selector consisting of a compact group of twentyfive
pushbuttons. When the operator pushes one button in each of three
columns, relays are actuated that connect the selected circuit unit to
the metering bus.
The instruments, the circuit selector, and the controls for the motor
generator set are mounted on a desk which is separate from the rest of
the board.
Procedure for using calculating board. After the data on the power
system to be studied have been assembled (see check list on p. 62 of
this chapter), the following steps must be taken:
1. Choose a suitable base or scale for representing the power
system on the calculating board.
2. Convert the data to this base or scale.
3. Assign board units to the various circuits.
4. Connect the board units.
5. Set the resistors, reactors, and capacitors.
6. Adjust the operating conditions.
7. Take readings.
8. Convert the readings to system values.
Some of these steps deserve further discussion.
Choice of base. The voltage scale ordinarily is such that the nominal
voltage of the power system is represented by the nominal voltage of
the calculating board. The current scale should be nearly as large as
it can be without subjecting any of the board units to overcurrent (see
maximum safe currents in Tables 2 and 3). If the current scale is too
small, current and power cannot be read accurately in lightly loaded
circuits. A satisfactory scale can be obtained by expressing system
quantities on a megavoltampere base in accordance with the following
tabler'"
Early models of the Calculator had the vector instruments only. Active and
reactive power was found by multiplying the voltage magnitude by the inphase and
quadrature components of current.
76 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
Maximum MegavoltAmperes
in Any Circuit
or Generator
oto 30
30 to 60
60 to 120
120 to 300
300 to 600
600 and above
MegavoltAmpere Base
to be Used for
System Quantities
10
20
40
100
200
400
System quantities expressed in per cent on the selected megavolt
ampere base are equal to the corresponding calculatingboard quanti ...
ties in per cent of the board base. The selection of the base is not
critical because of the wide range of impedances and instrument scales
on the board. To check the suitability of the base selected, the lowest
line impedance and highest load impedance (lightest load) may be
compared with the range of available board impedances, and the cur
rents of the most heavily loaded circuits should be compared with the
currentcarrying capacities of the assigned units. If necessary, two
or more generators or line or loadimpedance units can be connected
in parallel to carry larger currents, or two loadimpedance units can be
connected in series to represent very small loads. If there are a few
unusually heavy loads, it is better to represent them by two or more
load units in parallel than to use a higher impedance scale. Loads
smaller than 2% of the chosen megavoltampere base should be com
bined with other loads or neglected, because their influence on the
problem is negligible.
If, during a transientstability study, some circuits are overloaded
part of the time, for example, while a fault is on the system, the base
voltage of the board may be reduced temporarily, impedances being
left as they were.
Conversion of the data to the chosen base has already been discussed.
The resistance of each reactor (taken as 4%of the reactance setting on
the Westinghouse board, or 5% on the General Electric board) should
be subtracted from the desired resistance to obtain the proper setting
of the series resistor.
Acircuitdiagram should be prepared on whichare entered the imped
ances to be used and the assignedcircuit units on the calculating board.
Each circuit should be assigned a positive. direction, which either is
indicated on the diagram by an arrow pointing toward, or a dot at, the
"positive" end of each circuit, or is covered by a blanket rule that the
upper or lefthand end of each circuit is positive. Negative ends of
shunt branches (generators, line capacitances, loads, and autotrans
formers) are connected to the ground, or neutral, bus.
PROCEDURE FOR USING CALCULATING BOARD 77
Connections are made with attention to proper polarity by putting
plugs to be connected together into adjacent jacks. On the Westing
house board the positive end of each circuit element has a red cord, and
the negative end, a black cord; on the General Electric board the
yellow cord is positive, and the green cord, negative.
Setting impedances and capacitances to the values shown on the
circuit diagram is a simple operation. Positions of seriesparallel
switches and the like should be checked at the same time.
Checking of all the foregoing steps by another person is recom
mended because much time can be wasted by mistakes that are not
discovered until after many readings have been taken.
Adjustment of initial operating conditions. Generators, loads, auto
transformers, and synchronous condensers must be adjusted to rep
resent the desired condition of the power system before the occurrence
of a fault.
First, all generators should be set at the same phase angle and at zero
voltage. The power may then be turned on, and the generator volt
ages may be raised gradually to their normal value, whilethe generator
currents are watched for abnormal values caused by mistakes in setting
up the network. The loads and terminal voltages of the generators
are then adjusted approximately to the desired values by means of the
phase and voltage controls.
Bus voltages at other points are adjusted as desired by autotrans
formers or by capacitors or generator units representing synchronous
condensers. If a generator unit is used, its power must be adjusted to
zero.
Load impedances, it is assumed, were set initially to draw the re
quired active and reactive power at an estimated voltage. The im
portant loads are now readjusted for the actual load voltage. If load
adjusters are available, they are used for this purpose; otherwise the
resistor and reactor (or capacitor) must be readjusted with the aid of
the master wattmetervarmeter.
Generating units, condensers, and other elements should now be
given a final, accurate adjustment, which is checked with the master
instruments.
Limitations of system. Sometimes the desired operating conditions
cannot be obtained on the board. Unless a mistake has been made in
connecting or setting the board units, such failure indicates that the
desired condition is one that is impossible on the actual power system.
After adjusting the operating conditions, one should determine whether
all bus voltages are within suitable limits and whether any equipment
is overloaded either on the board or on the power system that it rep
78
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
resents. If any conditions are unsatisfactory, consideration should
be given to changing either the operating conditions or the network
itself, for example, by adding new lines, transformers, generators,
condensers, reactors, or phaseshifting transformers.
Readings. A complete set of readings is recommended at the outset
in order to check the network. Voltage and phase angle of each bus
and active and reactive power at each end of each circuit are usually
read and recorded. The readings are multiplied by suitable factors to
convert them to system values which are then marked on a oneline
circuit diagram. The following checks may be made: The algebraic
sum of the active power of all circuits on the same bus should be zero;
likewise the algebraic sum of the reactive power. The difference of
power at the two ends of a line may be taken to see whether the [2R
loss is reasonable; a similar test may be made for reactive power and
1
2X.
Perhaps the most valuable check, however, is for a person
familiar with the power system being studied to see whether all results
appear reasonable.
During the progress of a transientstability study the only readings
needed are the power outputs of the generators. Sometimes, however,
additional readings are taken, for example, to investigate the operation
of protective relays.
Changes of connections. The power to the board should be turned
off before changing any connections. After any important change of
conditions, such as the addition or removal of a short circuit, the phase
.and magnitude of the internal voltages of the generators should be
checked and readjusted if necessary.
Fault close togenerator. When a short circuit is placed on or near the
terminals of a generator, the current of that generator is high, and the
power factor is low. These conditions are not conducive to good
accuracy of the wattmeter. Furthermore, the resistance of the re
actors representing the generator and other lowresistance circuits be
tween generator and fault may not truly represent those resistances.
Under these conditions it is preferable, instead of reading the watt
meter, to compute the generator power as [2R, using the measured
current and the best obtainable data on the resistance. Conserva
tive conclusions regarding stability are reached by assuming this resist
ance to be zero.
Algebraic solution of networks: powerangle equations. Con
venient as the calculating board is for stability studies, it is neverthe
less desirable to know how to solve networks algebraically. For a
twomachine system algebraic solutions are usually so simple that
nothing is gained by using a calculating board, and for three or four
POWERANGLE EQUATIONS 79
[9al
[9b]
n
. . .
3
Network
o
2
machine systems algebraic solutions are still feasible and may be
resorted to when a board is not available.
Figure 7 is a schematic representation of a general nmachine net
work as it presents itself in most powersystem network problems. The
rectangle represents a passive (impedance) linear network of any form,
to which there are applied n ex
ternal voltages, representing the
internal voltages of the synchro
nous machines. One side of
each voltage source is connected
to a common or neutral terminal
(0); the other sides are con
nected to various points of the
network, numbered from 1 to n.
FIG. 7. An electric power network
The voltages E
1
, E
2
, En com represented by a passive linear network
monly represent voltages behind having external e.mJ.'s connected to it.
transient reactances, in which
case the transient reactances are to be regarded as parts of the net...
work inside the rectangle. Let the currents flowing into the network
at the terminals 1, 2, 3, n be calledIj, 1
2
, 1
3
, In.
The vector power (P +jQ) supplied to the network by any machine
may be found by 'multiplying the conjugate of the vector voltage by
the vector current. II II In symbols,
PI + jQI = EII
I
P
2
' + jQ2 = E
2
I
2
[9cl
where the bar over the E's denotes their conjugates. Furthermore,
since the network has been assumed linear, the currents supplied by
the various machines may be written as linear functions of the applied
voltages, thus:
n
II = YIIE
I
+YI2E2 + YlnEn = E YlkEk [lOa]
k=l
n
" "Then capacitive reactive power (leading current) is positive, and inductive
reactive power (lagging current) is negative, in accordance with the A.S.A. conven
tion. The opposite convention, however, is widely used in powersystem studies
and will probably be adopted by the A.S.A. In this case the conjugate of the
vector current should be multiplied by the vector voltage.
80 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
n
In = YnlEl + Yn2
E2
+rnnEn = E YnkEk [10c]
k=l
The V's are complex numbers known as the terminal self and mutual
admittances of the network, or as the drivingpoint and transfer admit
tances. If the two subscripts are alike, Y is a selfadmittance or driv
ingpoint admittance; if unlike, a mutual or transfer admittance.
The meaning of these admittances is revealed by a consideration of
what happens to eqs. 10 if all the applied voltages except one are made
equal to zero. By letting all voltages except E
l
become zero, we obtain:
11 = YllE
l,
1
2
= Y
21
E
1
, In = YnlE
l
[11]
permitting us to define the Y's as follows: Y
1l
is the ratio IlfE
l
when
all voltages except E
1
are zero; Y21 is the ratio 1
2
/ E
1
when all voltages
except E
l
are zero; and so forth. By letting all voltages except E
2
become zero, we can similarly define Y12, Y22, Yn2. These defini
tions point out how the admittances can be determined by measure
ment. We shall see how they can be determined by calculation.
Before doing so, however, let us turn back to eqs. 9, giving the vector
power output of each voltage source, and substitute into them eqs. 10.
We obtain
PI + jQ1 = E1Y11E1 + E1Y12E
2
+ E1Y1nEn
[12a]
[12b]
and so forth. These are vector equations. For stability calculations
it is preferable to have scalar equations involving the machine dis
placement angles o. Therefore let us substitute into eqs. 12. the
following:
s, = E
1
fJJ, E
2
= E
2
&, ... En = En& [13]
or, for the conjugates,
E
1
= ElL 81, E
2
= E
2
/ 82, ... En =E
n
/ 8n [14]
Also let
Y
11
= Y
11
/ S
11
, Y
12
= Y
12
/ S
l 2
, Y
21
= Y
2l
/ S21, Y22 = Y22 / S
22
[15]
DETERMINATION OF TERMINAL ADMITTANCES 81
and so forth. Equations 12 become
PI +jQI = E1
2Y
I1/ e l l +EIE2Y12Le12  81 +82
+E1EnYlnL81n  81 +8n
n
= E E1Ek
Y
l k /
8
1k  81 +8k
k=1
P
2
+jQ2 = E
2EIY21/ e 21  82 +81 +E2
2Y
22/ 8 22
+E2En
Y
2n /
e
2n  82 +8n
n
= L E
2EkY2k/
e
2k  82 + 8k
k=l
[16a]
[16b]
and so forth. Using the relation (which defines the notation),
!.:P = cos cP +j sin cP
and taking the real part of each side of the equations, we obtain
PI = E
1
2Y
l l cos 811 +E1E2Y12 cos (812  81 +82)
+ElEnYlncos (Oln  8
1
+ 8n)
n
= L E1EkYI
k
cos (elk  8
1
+ 8k) [17a]
k=l
P
2
= E
2EIY2l
cos (821  82 +81) + E
2
2Y
22
cos 822
+E
2En
Y
2n cos (e2n  82 + 8
n
)
n
= E E
2Ele
Y2k cos (8
2
k  82 +8le) [17b]
k=l
and so forth. Because these equations give the electric power output
of each machine (power input to the network) as functions of the
angular positions of all the machines, they may be called powerangle
equations. Inasmuch as this chapter deals primarily with networks,
the symbol P has been used for electric power instead of Pu, which was
used in Chapter II with the same meaning.
Algebraic solution of networks: determination of terminal admit
tances. Equations 17 suffice for finding the power output of all
machines when the voltage magnitude and phase (angular displace
ment) of all machines are known. To obtain such equations, however,
we must know how to obtain each Y = Y/8 for the given network.
A clue to a method of doing this is found by considering an n
terminal passive linear network having no nodes (junctions) except
the terminals. Such a network has, in general, an impedance element
connected between each pair of terminals (including the neutral), as
shown in Fig. 8 for a network of four terminals, including neutral (a
82 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
threemachine system). In. this network there are six impedance
elements. For a network of m terminals (or n = m  1
there are, in general, m(m  1)/2 = (n + 1) n/2 elements. If any
of these elements are lacking, they may be considered to be present as
elements of zero selfadmittance (that is, infinite impedance or open
circuit). If two or more elements are in parallel, they may be re
placed by an equivalent single element having an admittance equal
to the sum of the admittances of the several parallel elements. From
this viewpoint any network may be converted to a network having one
and only one element connected between each pair of nodes and having
m(m  1)/2 elements. This form of network is called a mesh circuit.
o
FIG. 8. A fourterminal passive network having one and only one element con
nected between each pair of terminals.
The machine currents in the network of Fig. 8 may be written as
linear functions of the machine voltages and the element selfadmit
tances (lowercase y's), by noting that each machine or terminal
current is the sum of several element currents, each of which may be
written as the product of the element admittance and the voltage
across the element. Thus,
1
1
= Yl2 (E
1
 E
2)
+ Y1S (E1  E
s
) + YOlE
1
[I8a]
1
2
= Y12(E
2
 E1) +Y2s(E2  Es) + Y02E2 [18b]
. .
1
3
= Yls(E
s
 E
1
) + Y23(E
a
 E2) + YosE
s
lI8e]
Regrouping the terms by E's,
11 = (YOI +Y12 +Yls)E1 + (YI2)E2 + (Yls)E
a
[I9a]
1
2
= (YI2)E1 + (Y02 +Y12 +Y23)E2 + (Y2s)E
a
[19b]
1
3
= (Yls)E
1
+ (Y2a)E2 + (Yoa + Y13 +Y23)E
s
[Igel
there are no loads or other shunt branches in the network, then m = n.
NETWORK REDUCTION 83
[20a]
[20b]
[20c]
By comparing these with the type equations (eqs. 10, rewritten for
n == 3 as eqs. 20, which follow)
11 = Y I IE
1
+Y
12
E
2
+ Y
l a
E
a
1
2
= Y21
E
l +Y22E2 + Y
2s
E
a
l
a
= Y
3l
E
I
+Y
32E2
+ YasE
a
the terminal admittances are determined as
(Y1l = YOI + Y12 + Y13 [21a]
selfadmittances J
l Y22
= Y02 +Y12 +Y23 [21bJ
Y33 = Y03 +Y13 + Y2a [21c]
(Y
12
= Y
2l
= Y12 [22a]
mutual admittances tY13 = Y
3l
= Y13 [22b]
Y23 = Y32 = Y23 [22c]
That is, each terminal selfadmittance is the sum of the element admit
tances of all the elements connected to that terminal. Each terminal
mutual admittance (between two given terminals) is the negative of
the element admittance of the element connected between the given
terminals,
Algebraic solution of networks: network reduction. Wenowhave
the terminal self and mutual admittances in terms of the element
selfadmittances of a network having no nodes except the terminals.
In general, the network will have other nodes. These extra nodes,
however, may be eliminated by a process known as network reduction.
To establish the process, suppose that the extra nodes are initially
regarded as extra terminals. Suppose, for example, that the network
has five nodes, of which one is to be eliminated. The terminal volt
ampere equations for five terminals (neutral and four others) are:
11 = YllEl +Y
12
E 2 +Y13E 3 +Y
14
E 4: [23a]
1
2
= Y21E
1
+Y22E
2
+ Y
23E3
+ Y
24E4:
[23b]
1
3
= YalEt +Ya2E 2 + YaaEa + Y
a4E4
[23c]
14 = Y4l
EI
+Y42
E2
+Y43E3 +Y
44E4:
[23d]
Now suppose that node 4 is to be eliminated. It can be eliminated
only if it has no external connections; that is, if, when considered as
a terminal, it is opencircuited. Hence
84 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
Solving for E
4
and substituting the expression in place of E
4
in eqs.
23 give
E
4
= _ Y41E1 +Y42E2 +Y43E3
Y44
which may be written in the standard form:
11 = Y
11'E1
+ Y12'E
2
+Yls'E
s
1
2
= Y
21
' E
1
+ Y22'E
2
+ Y
2s
' E
s
Is = Ys1'E
l
+ YS2'E
2
+ Ys3' E
s
[25]
[26a]
[26b]
[26c]
[27a]
[27b]
[27c]
in which the Y"s are the new terminal admittances. These new
terminal admittances are related to the old ones by
y , Y Y14
Y41
[28] 11 = 11 
Y44
Y12
,
= Y
12
 Y
14Y42
[29]
Y
44
Y13
,
= Y
13
 Y
14Y43
[30]
Y44
Y22
,
= Y
22
 Y
24Y42
[31]
Y
44
Y23
,
= Y
28
_ Y
24Y43
[32]
Y
44
Y33
,
= Y
33
_ Y
34Y43
[33]
Y44
or, in general, by
Y
j k
' = Y
j k
 Y
j 4Y
4
k
[34]
Y44
wherej = 1,2,3; k = 1,2,3.
NETWORK REDUCTION
85
[35a]
[35b]
[35e]
[35d]
[36a]
[36b]
[36e]
[36d]
[36e]
[36f]
[37a]
[37b]
[37e]
[38a]
[38b]
[3Sc]
Now let us find the relations between the elements of the old and
new networks. Assume that both old and new networks are of the
standard type having one and only one element between each pair of
terminals. Use relations like those of eqs, 21 and 22, namely:
Yll = YOI + Y12 + Y13 + Y14
Y22 = Y02 + Y12 + Y23 + Y24
Y33 = Y03 + Y13 + Y23 + Y34
Y44 = Y04 + Y14 + Y24 +Y34
Y12 = Y
21
= Y12
Y 13 = Y31 = Y13
Y 14 = Y41 = Y14
Y23 = Y32 = Y23
Y
24
= Y42 = Y24
Y34 = Y43 = Y34
Yl t ' = YOl' + Y12' + Y13'
Y
22'
= Y02' + Y12' + Y23'
Y
, '+ '+ ' 33 = Y03 Y13 Y23
Y
t 2
' = Y21' = YI2'
Y
' Y' ,
13 = 31 = Y13
Y23' = Y32' = Y23'
Substitute these relations (eqs. 35 to 38 inclusive) into eqs. 28 to 34
inclusive. This substitution works out most easily for the mutual
terminal admittances, eqs. 29, 30, and 32. For example, substitution
in eq. 29 gives:
, (YI4) (Y24)
Y12 = Y12 
Y04 + Y14 + Y24 + Y34
or, changing signs,
, + Y14Y24
Y12 = Y12
Y04 + Y14 + Y24 + Y34
In similar manner, we obtain
, + Y14Y34
Y13 = Y13
Y04 + Y14 + Y24 + Y34
, + Y ~ Y 3 4
Y23 = Y23
Y04 + Y14 + Y24 + Y34
[39]
[40]
[41)
86
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
[42]
The equations for terminal selfadmittances require a little more
manipulation but. give similar results. For example, substitution in
eq. 28 gives
, , , ( YI4) ( YI4)
YOI + Y12 + Y13 = YOI + Y12 +Y13 +Y14  + + +
Y04 Y14 Y24 Y34
Subtraction of eqs. 39 and 40 from this gives
, + Y14(Y14 + Y24 + Y34)
YOI = YOI Y14 
Y04 + Y14 + Y24 + Y34
+
Y14(Y04 + Y14 + Y24 + Y34  Y14  Y24  Y34)
= YOI
Y04 + Y14 + Y24 + Y34
+
Y04Y14
= YOI
Y04 +Y14 +Y24 + Y34
Similarly
In general
, + Y04Y24
Y02 = Y02
Y04 + Y14 + Y24 + Y34
, + Y04Y34
Y03 = Y03
Y04 +Y14 + Y24 + Y34
, Yj4Yk4
Yjk =Yik +4
L Yi4
i=O
[43]
[44]
[45]
Equation 45 may be interpreted as follows: Every element of the new
or reduced networkis the result of paralleling the corresponding element of
the old network with an element arising from a starmesh conversion.
The admittance of the mesh element arising from the starmesh con
version is given by the last term of eq. 45. The starmesh conversion
with somewhat simplified notation is shown in Fig. 9. Figure 9a shows
a fourpoint star which is to be converted into a fourterminal mesh
(Fig. 9b), thereby eliminating the node S. The meshelement admit
tances in terms of the starelement admittances are:
YIY2
[46a]
Y2Y3
[46d] Y12 = Y23 =
L:y L:y
YIY3
[46b]
Y2Y4
[46e] Y13 = Y24=
L:y L:y
YIY4
[46c]
Y3Y4
[46f] Y14 = Y34 =
L:y L:y
where
LY ~ Yl + Y2 + Y3 + Y4
[47]
NETWORK REDUCTION
87
If the star has n points, similar formulas hold, but the expression
for ~ y has n terms. If n = 3, we have a Ydelta conversion. If
n = 2, we have a simple series combination.
Only if n = 3 is there always a unique inverse conversion, that is,
from delta to Y. In general, the conversion from mesh to star for
n > 3 isnot possible. If n = 2, the conversion can be made but isnot
unique; that is, a single element can be split into two elements in series
in an infinite number of ways.
By one starmesh conversion, one node iseliminated. By successive
starmesh conversions, as many nodes as desired may be eliminated.
For present purposes all nodes except the terminals are to be eliminated.
2 2
4 4
(0) Star circuit (b) Mesh circuit
FIG. 9. Starmesh conversion.
The formula for starmesh conversion is simpler when expressed in
terms of admittances than in terms of impedances. Furthermore, the
parallel combinations of the elements resulting from such a conversion
with other elements are made more easily by working with admittances
than with impedances. For these reasons, in addition to the fact that
we want terminal admittances in our final expressions for power, it
is preferable to work with admittances rather than impedances while
reducing a network, even though the use of impedances is, perhaps,
more customary.
The process of network reduction may be summarized as follows,
assuming the impedances of the elements to be given:
1. Make all the possible series combinations; also make parallel
combinations of elements having equal impedances.
2. Convert impedances to admittances.
3. Eliminate a node by starmesh conversion, giving preference to
a node with the least number of elements connected to it.
4. Make parallel combinations of the new elements resulting from
the conversion and the old elements.
88
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 until all nodes except the terminals have
been eliminated. ***
To prepare for the power calculations required in a stability study,
perform the following additional step, which is not strictly a part of
the process of network reduction:
6. Compute the terminal admittances from the element admit
tances by using equations like 21 and 22.
All these steps must be repeated for a number of different network
conditions. Thus, if the disturbance causing the machines to swing is
a fault, the network must be solved for the prefault condition, the
fault condition, and, unless the fault is sustained, for the postfault or
cleared condition. If fault clearing is accomplished by sequential
opening of two or more breakers, the network must be solved for two
or more fault conditions. Also, if different runs are to be made for
different fault locations, different lines connected or disconnected, or
other different conditions, network solutions must be made for each
condition. On a calculating board the required changes in the net
work for these different conditions are made very simply and quickly.
It is clear that the use of a calculating board is desirable in multi
machine stability studies.
Determination of initial operating conditions. Even after deter
mining the network terminal admittances for the prefault, fault, and
postfault conditions, we are still not ready to begin calculation of the
swing curves, for the initial operating conditions must first be deter
mined. Specifically, we must find the values of magnitude and phase
of the internal voltages of all the synchronous machines. If these
values were given, it would be simple to substitute them into the power
equations (like eqs. 17) for the prefault condition and thus. to calcu
late the prefault power output of each machine, which is also the
power input to the machine.
However, the initial conditions are not usually known in such terms.
Usually the power outputs of the machines are known or assumed; the
remaining information may consist of the reactive power outputs at
the terminals (not behind transient reactance), the power factor,
terminal voltage, current, or some mixture of such quantities. Oc
casionally conditions somewhere in the network other than at the
machine terminals are given: for instance, voltage at a certain sub
station bus, or power or current in a certain line. From such data,
sometimes insufficient and sometimes conflicting, the initial values of
***Although any network can be reduced by the exclusive use of starmesh con
versions and parallel combinations, in many networks the reduction can be has
tened by the use of 6Y conversions and series combinations.
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS 89
voltage behind transient reactance and of angular positions must be
determined as well as is possible. As a rule, this can be done only by
cutandtry methods, which are likely to be very laborious if the net
work is solved algebraically. Even with a calculating board cutand
try procedures must be adopted, but the work goes much faster when
a board is used than when algebraic solutions are relied upon.
lunt Fisk Deering Patten Murphy
0.30 0.10 0.08 0.12
A
0.30 0.10 0.08 0.12
B
0.10
0.16
0.25 0.10 0.05
Dyche
Thorne Ward
0.05
FIG. 10. Threemachine system of Example 1. Line reactances are given in per
unit on lOOMva. base.
After the initial power outputs, angles, and internal voltages have
been found, the calculation of the swing curves may be begun.
EXAMPLE 1
The layout of a 60cycle threephase threemachine system is given in
Fig. 10. The reactances of the lines, expressed in per unit on a lOOMva.
base, are marked on the figure. Line resistances may be neglected. Data
on the generators and on the initial generatingstation outputs and bus volt
TABLE 4
DATA FOR EXAMPLE 1
Steam Number Rating of H
Initial Initial
Xd' Station Bus
Station or of Each Unit
(p.u.)
(Mj. per
Output Voltage
Hydro Units (Mva.) Mva.)
(Mw.) (p.u.)
Lunt Hydro 3 35 0.35 3.00 80 1.05
Murphy Steam 4 75 0.21 7.00 230 ,1.00
Wieboldt Steam 2 50 0.18 8.00 90 1.00
ages are given in Table 4. All loads may be neglected except those at
Murphy and Wieboldt, which are each 200 Mw. at unity power factor.
90 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
Find the initial phase and magnitude of the voltage behind transient
reactance (Xd') of each generator.
Solution.
Outline.
1. The network between the busses at Lunt, Murphy, and Wieboldt
will be reduced to its simplest form (a delta).
2. The known magnitudes and assumed phase angles of the voltages of
these three busses will be substituted into the power equations, and the
angles will be varied until the calculated values of power input to the net
work agree with the given generatingstation outputs less local load.
3. The current supplied to the network at each terminal will be found
from the known terminal 'voltages and admittances.
4. The generators at each station will be combined by paralleling their
impedances to give one equivalent machine at each station. The internal
Zl drop of each equivalent machine will be added to the terminal voltage
to find the phase and magnitude of the internal voltage.
Node to beretained.
Network element with
admittance.
Element entering into
star mesh conversion.
Element resulting from
star mesh conversion.
@
1.21
I , I I
1. Network reduction. The symbols which will be used are given in Fig.
11. First the network of Fig. 10 is simplified by making the obvious series
and parallel combinations and by omitting
Node to beeliminated, the open branch from Ward to Thorne.
The result is shown in Fig. 12a, in which
the names of the stations are abbreviated
to their initial letters. The values of im
pedance in per unit are encircled. These
values of impedance are converted to ad
mittance values, which are not encircled.
The impedance and admittance angles,
FIG. 11. Symbols used in net which are 90
0
and 90
0
respectively, are
work reduction. omitted for brevity.
By means of alternate starmesh conver
sions and parallel combinations of elements, all nodes are eliminated except
the three (L, M, and Wi) which are to be retained. The order in which
they are eliminated is not particularly important; Wa is eliminated first.
The star elements radiating from Wa are crosshatched in Fig. 12a. The
resulting mesh elements are shown by broken lines in Fig. 12b. The star
mesh calculations are as follows:
E Y= 10.0+5.0 +10.0 = 25.0
10.0 X 5.0
YFD = YWiD = 25.0 = 2.0
. = 10.0 X 10.0 = 4 0
Y F W ~ 25.0
One parallel combination is made between Wi and D, with the result shown
in Fig. 12c.
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS
91
We
5.00
(e)
L (Q][) F
6.66
8.08
L 2.00 M
@e
, ,
'J'$', .
Wi
40 X 42 = 16.15
104
20 X 42
104
2 X 42
= 0.81
104
(h)
L 6.66 F 6.35 M
@lllllllq
(g)
Wi
D
p
F
6.66
(b)
(d)
L
( i ) e,
Wi
FIG. 12. Reduction of the network of Fig. 10 (Example I).
Next, node D is eliminated, with results as shown in Fig. 12d. The
calculations are as follows:
1: Y= 40.0 +20.0 +2.0 +42.0 = 104.0
40 X 20 = 7.70
104
40 X 2 = 0.77
104
20 X 2 = 0.385
104
Four parallel combinations are made, with results as shown in Fig. 12e.
92 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
Node P is now eliminated, with results as shown in Fig. 12/. The calcu
lations are as follows:
E y = 11.5 + 24.4 + 14.3 = 50.2
11.5 X 24.4 = 5.58 11.5 X 14.3 = 3.28
50.2 50.2
24.4 X 14.3 = 6.94
50.2
Three parallel combinations are made, with results as shown in Fig. 12g.
Next, node F is eliminated, with the result shown in Fig. 12k. One
parallel combination is made, resulting finally in the Ll network of Fig. 12i.
2. Determination of bus voltage angles. The terminal admittances are
calculated from the element admittances as follows:
YLL = 2.00/90 + 2.55/ 90 = 4.55/ 90 p.u.
YMM = 2.0 /90 +25.5/90 = 27.5/90 p.u,
Yww = 2.6 /90 +25.5/90 = 28.1(90 p.u,
YLM = YML = 2.00/90 = 2.00/90 p.u,
YLw = YWL = 2.55/90 = 2.55/90 p.u,
YMw = YWM = 25.5/90 = 25.5/90 p.u.
The power inputs to the network are equal to the generator outputs less
local load.
P L = 0.80  0 0.80 p.u.
PM = 2.30  2.00 = 0.30 p.u.
Pw = 0.90  2.00 = 1.10 p.u.
The bus voltages are:
EL = 1.05&
EM = 1.00/5M
E
w
= 1.00/0 (taken as reference phase)
The power equations are:
PL = EL
2
y LL cos eLL + ELEMYLMcos (eLM  OL +OM)
+ELEwYLw cos (8LW  OL+ ow) (a)
PM = EM
2YMM
cos OMM +EMELYZ.fL cos (eML  OM +OL)
+EMEwYMwCOS(aMWOM+OW) (b)
Pw = Ew
2Yww
cos Oww+EwELYWL cos (aWL  Ow +OL)
+ EwEtllYWM cos (SWAt  Ow +OM) (c)
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS 93
Because there are no losses in the network, only the first two equations
need be used. Because eLL = e
MM
= 8
ww
= 90, the selfadmittance
terms vanish. eLM = eLW = 8ML = eMW = 90, and we may use the
relation, cos (90
0
 x) = sin z, Also noting that Ow = 0, we have:
PL ~ ELEMYLMsin (OL  OM) +ELEwYLW sin OL (d)
PM = ELEMYLMsin (OM  01,) + EMEwYMW sin OM (e)
Substituting numerical values, we obtain:
0.80 = 2.10 sin (OL  OM) + 2.68 sin OL
0.30 = 2.10 sin (OM  OL) + 25.5 sin OM
(J)
(g)
These equations must be solved by trial for OL and OM. Because of the large
coefficient of sin OM we may be sure that OM is small. As a first trial, let
OM = o. Equation Jthen becomes
0.80 = (2.10 + 2.68) sin OL = 4.78 sin OL
sin OL = 0.80 = 0.1675 OL = 9.6
0
4.78 '
Substitution of this value of OL in eq. g gives
0.30 ~ 2.10 sin (9.6) + 25.5 sin OM
25.5 sin OM = 0.30 +2.10 X 0.1675 = 0.30 + 0.352 = 0.652
sin OM = 0.0256; OM = 1.5
0
Substitution of OL = 9.6
0
and OM = 1.5 into eqs. Jand g gives for the right
hand members:
PL = 2.10 sin 8.1
0
+ 2.68 sin 9.6
0
= 2.10 X 0.141 + 2.68 X 0.167
= 0.296 + 0.448 = 0.744 (Should be 0.80.)
PM = 2.10 sin (8.1) + 25.5 sin 1.5
=  0.296 + 0.652 = 0.356 (Should be 0.30.)
PL will be increased by increasing OL and PM by increasing OM. Since PL
is too small and PM too large, OL should be increased and OM decreased.
Try OL = 10.3, OM = 1.4.
PL = 2.10 sin 8.9
0
+ 2.68 sin 10.3
= 2.10 X 0.1547 + 2.68 X 0.1788
= 0.324 + 0.479 = 0.803 (Should be 0.800.)
PM = 0.324 +25.5 sin 1.4
0
=  0.324 + 25.5 X 0.0244
= 0.324 +0.622 = 0.298 (Should be 0.300.)
94 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
These values are close enough to the correct values. The bus voltages are
therefore
EL = 1.05/10.3 = 1.032+jO.188 p.u.
EM = 1.00/1.4 = 1.000+jO.024 p.u,
Ew = 1.00 /0.0
0
= 1.000+jO.OOO p.u,
3. Determination of currents.
ILW = YLW (EL  Ew) =  j2.55 (0.032+ jO.188)
= 0.479  jO.082 p.u,
IMW = YMW (EM  Ew) = j25.5 X jO.024 = 0.612+jO.OOO p.u,
ILM = YLM (EL  EM) = j2.00 (0.032+jO.162)
= 0.324  jO.064 p.u,
The terminal currents of the network are
IL = ILw +I
LM
= 0.803  jO.146 p.u.
1M = IMW  ILM = 0.288+jO.064 p.u,
Iw = ILW  IMW = 1.091 +jO.082 p.U.
The load currents, calculated by the formula
I = p t. jQ
E
are
2.00LO
1M ' = L  0 = 2.00L1.4 = 2.000+jO.049p.u,
1.00 1.4
2.00i!2
I w' = ;n = 2.00i!2 = 2.000+jO.OOO
1 . 0 0 ~
The generator currents are equal to the currents supplied to the network
plus local load:
At L, IA = I
L
= 0.803  jO.146 p.u,
At W, I
B
= 1
M
+1
M
' = 2.288+jO.113 p.u,
At W, Ie = I
w
+ I
w
' = 0.909 + jO.082 p.u,
4. Determinationof generator internal voltages. The generator reactances,
which were given in per unit on the basis of the generator ratings, must be
converted to per unit 011 lOOMva. base.
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS
95
100
XA = 0.353 X 35 = 0.333 p.u,
100
XB =0.21 4 X 75 = 0.070 p,u,
100
Xc = 0.18=0.180 p.u.
2X 50
ZA = iO.a3a p.u,
ZB = jO.070 p.u,
Zc = iO.180 p.u.
Each internal voltage is the vector sum of the terminal (bus) voltage and the
internal ZI drop.
EA = EL +ZAIA = 1.032+iO.I88+jO.333 (0.803  jO.146)
= 1.032+ jO.188 +0.049+jO.268 = 1.081 +jO.456
= 1.17/23.0
0
p.u, Ans.
E
B
= EM+ZBI
B
= 1.000+jO.024 +jO.070 (2.29+jO.11)
= 1.000 +jO.024  0.008+iO.160 = 0.992+jO.184
= 1.01/10.4 p.u, Ans,
Ec = Ew+ZeIc = 1.000+jO.OOO +jO.180 (0.909 +jO.082)
= 1.000 0.015+jO.164 = 0.985+jO.164
= 1.00 /9.5 p.u, Ans.
Check.
PA = EAI
A
= 1.081 X 0.803+0.456 (0.146) = 0.868  0.067
= 0.801 p.u, (Should be 0.80.)
PB = EBI
B
= O. 92 X 2.29 +0.184 X 0.113 = 2.27+0.021
= 2.291 p.u, (Should be 2.30.)
Pa = EcIe = O. 85 X 0.909+0.164 X 0.082 = 0.895+0.013
= 0.908 p.u, (Should be 0.90.)
EXAMPLE 2
Find the terminal admittances of the network of the threemachine system
of' Example 1, including the loads and the directaxis transient reactances of
the machines, (a) when a threephase short circuit is present at point X,
Fig. 10, and (b) after the short circuit has been cleared by opening both ends
of the line.
Solution. (a) The short circuit at X is electrically equivalent to a short
circuit on the Patten bus. In the network .reduction of Example 1, the
Patten bus (node P) was preserved until the stage shown in Fig. 12e. The
application of the short circuit can be represented by connecting node P to
node 0 (the neutral), a node not shown in Fig. 12 because the network re
duced in Example 1 had no shunt elements. Hence P may be relabeled
96 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
as O. The admittances of the three equivalent machines and of the two loads
must be added to the network. All admittances should now be expressed as
complex numbers, because the load admittances do not have the same angle
as do the line and machine admittances. A lOOMva. base will be used, as
in Example 1.
The machine impedances in per unit on a 100Mva. base, as found in
Example 1, and the corresponding admittances are as follows:
Machine Station Impedance Admittance
A Lunt 0.33 /90
0
3.00/90
B Murphy 0.07 /90
0
14.3/90
0
C Wieboldt 0.18/90
0
5.55(90
The admittances of the loads at Murphy and at Wieboldt are each
2 . 0 0 ~ p.u.
After the machine and load admittances are added, the network of Fig. 12e
becomes that of Fig. 13a.
A series combination is then made between A and F; eliminating node L,
and parallel combinations are made between M and 0 and between Wi
and O. The computation is as follows:
3.00/  90 X 6.66/  90
AF: 9 . 6 6 ~ = 2.07/90
Mo: 2.0  j24.4 = 24.5/85.3
WiO: 2.0  j14.33 = 14.5/82.0
The resulting network is shown in Fig. 13b. Next, node F is eliminated by a
starmesh conversion, as follows:
E y = (2.07 + 0.77 + 11.5+4.81) /90 = 19.15/90
AM: 2.07 X 0.77 L90
0
= 0.083L90
0
19.15
AD: 2.07 X 11.5 /900 = 1.24/900
19.15
AWi: 2.07 X 4.81 /900 = 0.520L900
1915
MO: 0.77 X 11.5 L90
0
= 0.46/90
0
19.15 
MWi: 0.77 X 4.81 L90
0
= 0.193L90
0
19.15
oWi: 11.5 X 4.81 L90
0
= 2.88/90
19.15
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS 97
B
  ~ ~ @
(c)
(h)
C
FIG. 13. Reduction of the network of Fig. 10 with a short circuit at X (Example 2).
98 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
OB:
The resulting network is shownin Fig. 13c. Parallel combinations are made,
as follows:
MWi: (16.15+0.19) /90 = 16.34/90
Mo: (2.0  j24.4)  jO.5 = 2.0  j24.9 = 25.0/85.4
Wio: (2.0  j14.3)  j2.9 = 2.0  j17.3 = 17.3/83.3
The resulting network is shown in Fig. 13d. Node M is eliminated, as
follows:
I: y = (2.0  j24.9)  j16.3  j14.3  jO.1 = 2.0  j55.6
= 55.6/88.0
25.0/85.4 X
/
0 = 6.42/87.4
55.6_88.0
25.0/85.4 X
OWi: / = 7.34/87.4
55.6_88.0
14.3/90 X 16.34/90
BWi: L = 4.20L92.0
55.6_88.0
Ao:
AB:
0.083L 90 X 25.0/ 85.4 /
_   = 0.037,__87_.4_
, 5.5.6/ 88.0
0.083/90 X 14.3/90
/
0 = 0.021/92.0
55.6_88.0
/
. AWi: / =0.024_92.0
55.6_ 88.0 
The resulting network is shown in Fig. 13e. Parallel combinations are
made, as follows:
OWi: 17.3/83.3 + 7.34/87.4 == 2.0  j17.2 +0.3  j7.3
= 2.3  j24.5 = 24.6/  84.6
Ao: j1.24  jO.04 = jl.28 = 1.28/90
AWi: jO.52  jO.02 = jO.54 = 0.54/90
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS 99
The resulting network is shown in Fig. 13/. Node Wi is eliminated, as
follows:
L: y = 24.6/ 84.6 +5.55/ 90 +0.54/ 90 +4.20/  92.0
= (2.3  j24.5)  j5.6  jO.5+ (0.2  j4.2)
= 2.1  j34.8 = 34.9/86.7
0.54/ 90 X 24.6/  84.6
AO: = 0.38/87.9
34.9/  86.7
0.54L 90 X 4.20/92.0
AB: = 0.065/95.3
34.9/ 86.7
AC.
. 0.54/90 X 5.55/90 / 0
= 0.086  93.3
34.9/86.7
420/92.0 X 24.6/84.6 _ /
BD: /  2.96_89.9
34.9_86.7
4.20/92.0 X 5.55/  90
BC: = 0.668/ 95.3
34.9/86.7
O
 C.. 24.6L84.6 X 5.55/90
= 3.91/87.9
34.9/86.7
The resulting network is shown in Fig. 13g. Parallel combinations are
made as follows:
AB: 0.065L95.3 +0.021/92.0
= 0.005  jO.065  0.001  jO.021 = 0.006  jO.086
= 0.086/94
AO: 1.28/90 + 0.38/87.9 = jl.28 +0.02  jO.38
= 0.02  jl.66 = 1.66/89.2
BO: 6.42/87.4 +2.96/89.9 = 0.29  j6.42 +0.01  j2.96
= 0.30  j9.38 = 9.38/88.2
The result is the final network shown in Fig. 13k.
Calculation oj terminal admittances.
YAA = 1.66/89.2 + 0.086/94.0 +0.086/93.3
= 0.02  jl.66  0.01  jO.09  0.01  jO.09
= 0.00  jl.84 = 1.84/90.0 p.u. Ans.
100
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
YBB = 9.38/88.2 +0.086/94.0 +0.668/95.3
= 0.30  j9.38  0.01  jO.09  0.05  iO.66
= 0.24  j10.13 = 10.14/88.7 p.u, Ans.
Yee = 3.91/87.9 +0.086/93.3 +0.668/95.3
= 0.15  j3.91  0.01  jO.09  0.05  iO.66
= 0.09  j4.66 = 4.66/ 88.9 p.u, Ans.
YAB =  0.086/  94.0 = 0.086/86.0 p.u. Am.
YAc = 0.086/93.3 = 0.086/86.7 p.u. Ans.
YBc = 0.668/95.3 = 0.668/84.7 p.u. Ans,
(b) To clear the fault, the line from Dyche (D) to Patten (P) is discon
nected from the network. In the network reduction of Example 1 this line
A B
FIG. 14. Network resulting from the reduction of the network of Fig. 10 with
the line from Patten to Dyche disconnected (Example 2).
was preserved until the stage shown in Fig. 12c. We may start, therefore,
with that diagram and disconnect the line, then further reduce the network,
preserving terminals L, M, and Wi. At this point the load and machine
admittances may be attached, as in part a of this solution, and the network
further reduced, preserving terminals A, B, C, and O. The details of calcu
lation will not be given here. The resulting network is shown in Fig. 14.
The element admittances are:
YAB = 1.12/100.5 = 0.205  il.IO p.u.
YBC = 3.06/ 102.6 = 0.66  j2.98 p.u.
YeA = 0.502/ 100.8 = 0.093  jO.493p.u.
YAO = 0.335/10.8 = +0.330  jO.063 p.u,
YBO = 2.48/10.7 = +2.44  jO.46 p.u.
yeo = 1.11/10.9 = +1.08jO.21 p.u,
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS 101
The terminal admittances are:
YAA = YAB + YCA + YAO = +0.03  jl.66 = 1.66/89.0 p.u, Ans.
YBB = JAB + YBC + YBO = +1.58  j4.54 = 4.81/70.7 p.u, Ans.
Yeo = YBC +YCA + soo = +0.33  j3.68 = 3.69/84.9 p.u, Ana.
Y
AB
= YAB = +0.205 +jI.IO = 1.12/79.5 p.u. Ans.
YBC = YBC = +0.66 +j2.98 = 3.06 /77.4 p.u. Ans.
YCA = YCA = +0.093 +jO.493 = 0.502/79.2 p.u, Ans.
EXAMPLE 3
Calculate and plot swing curves for the threemachine system of Fig. 10
with initial conditions as in Example 1, assuming a threephase short circuit
to occur at point X, Fig. 10, and to be cleared (a) in 0.40 sec. and (b) in 0.35
sec. Carry the curves far enough to determine whether the system is
stable.
Solution. The initial conditions, as calculated in Example 1, are:
E
A
= 1.17
EB = 1.01
Eo = 1.00
~ A = 23.0
8
B
= 10.4
8
c
= 9.5
PuA = PiA = 0.80
PUB = PiB = 2.30
Puc = PiC = 0.90
The terminal admittances with the fault on, as calculated in Example 2,
part a, are:
YAA cos 8AA = 0
YBB cos eBB = 0.24
Ycc cos ecc = 0.09
YAB = 0.086 aAB = 86.0
YBC = 0.668 eBC = 84.7
YCA = 0.086 eCA = 86.7
The terminal admittances with the fault cleared, as calculated in Example
2, part b, are:
YAA cos 8AA = 0.03
YBB cos eBB = 1.58
Yoo cos ecc = 0.33
YAB = 1.12
YBC = 3.06
YCA = 0.502
eAB = 79.5
aBC = 77.4
eCA = 79.2
102 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
The powerangle equations have the form of eqs. 17. Substituting the
foregoing numerical values, we obtain the following expressions, which
apply while the fault is on:
PuA = (1.17)2 X 0 + 1.17 X 1.01 X 0.086 cos (86.0  ~ A +~ B )
+ 1.17 X 1.00 X 0.086 cos (86.7  ~ A +ac)
= 0.10 cos (86.0  OA +~ B ) +0.10 cos (86.7  OA +Oc)
PuB = (1.01)2 X 0.24 +1.01 X 1.17 X 0.086 cos (86.0  ~ B +aA)
+ 1.01 X 1.00 X 0.668 cos (84.7  OB +~ c )
= 0.24 + 0.10 cos (86.0  OB +OA) + 0.68 cos (84.7  OB +oc)
Puc = (1.00)2 X 0.09 + 1.00 X 1.17 X 0.086 cos (86.7  ~ c +~ A )
+ 1.00 X 1.01 X 0.668 cos (84.7  Oc + ~ B )
= 0.09 +0.10 cos (86.7
0
 ~ c +~ A ) +0.68 cos (84.7
0
 a
c
+ OB)
and the following expressions, which applyafter the fault has been cleared:
PuA = (1.17)2 X 0.03 + 1.17 X 1.01 X 1.12 cos (79.5  ~ A + OB)
+ 1.17 X 1.00 X 0.502 cos (79.2  ~ A +~ c )
= 0.04 + 1.30 cos (79.5  OA +DB) +0.59 cos (79.2  DA +DC)
PuB = (1.01)2 X 1.58 + 1.01 X 1.17 X 1.12 cos (79.5
p
 OB +DA)
+ 1.01 X 1.00 X 3.06 cos (77.4  DB +~ c )
= 1.61 + 1.30 cos (79.5  OB + DA) + 3.09 cos (77.4  OB + oc)
Puc = (1.00)2 X 0.33 + 1.00 X 1.17 X 0.502 cos (79.2  Dc +OA)
+ 1.00 X 1.01 X 3.06 cos (77.4  ~ c +OB)
= 0.33 +0.59 cos (79.2  Oc +OA) + 3.09 cos (77.4  Oc +OB)
The inertia constants of the machines may be calculated from the data
given in Example 1 by the formula (eq. 54, Chapter II)
M= GH = GH
180!' 180 X 60
where M = inertia constant in per unit.
G = station rating in perunit apparent power.
H = kinetic energy at rated speed in megajoules per megavolt
ampere of rating.
I = frequency in cycles per second.
M = 3 X 35 X 3.00 = 2.92 X 104
A 100 X 10,800
M = 4 X 75 X 7.00 = 19 45 X 10....
B 100 X 10,800
M = 2 X 50 X 8.00 = 7.41 X 104
c 100 X 10,800
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS
103
The time interval ilt for pointbypoint calculations will be taken as0.10
sec. Then
_il_t
2
= 0.010 = 34.3
MA 2.92 X 104
_1l_t
2
= 0.010 = 5.14
MB 19.45 X 104
_1l_t
2
= 0.010 = 13.5
Me 7.41 X 104
The computations of power are carried out in Tables 5, 6, and 7, and the
computations of swing curves in Tables 8, 9, and 10. The results of the
computations of swing curves, namely, the angular positions of the three
 Cleared 0.40sec.
)
)
 Cleared 0.3) sec.
tis;:;
! / ~ .
~
, ~
;}
/'
"
b\J,
/'
'9;i'f
. .4
~ ~
/
jf
J'
jr
)
V
V
r
~
~
~

400
o
o 0.5 0.8
lime (seconds)
FIG. 15. Swing curves of the threemachine system of Fig. 10 with a threephase
short circuit at point X near Patten bus cleared in 0.35 sec. and in 0.40 sec. Ma
chines Band Cstay within about 2
0
of each other. See also Fig. 16. (Example 3.)
machines as functions of time, and also the angular differences between each
pair of machines, are listed in Table 11. The swing curves are plotted in
Figs. 15 and 16. Figure 15 shows the angular position of each machine with
respect to a reference axis rotating at normal speed. All three machines
increase their speeds on account of the drop in output during the short cir
cuit and the assumption of constant input. Machines Band C swing prac
tically together and are therefore represented by the same curve. Figure 16
shows the angular position of machine A with respect to machine B.
If the short circuit is cleared in 0.40 sec., the system is unstable: machine
T
A
B
L
E
5
.
C
O
M
P
U
T
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
P
u
A
(
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
3
)
e
A
B
8
A
B
e
A
B

l
J
A
B
c
o
s
P
A
B
m
P
A
B
a
A
C
l
J
A
C
S
A
C

a
A
C
c
o
s
P
A
C
m
P
A
C
P
A
A
P
u
A
8
6
.
0
1
2
.
6
7
3
.
4
0
.
2
8
6
0
.
1
0
0
.
0
3
8
6
.
7
1
3
.
5
7
3
.
2
0
.
2
8
9
0
.
1
0
0
.
0
3
0
0
.
0
6
"
2
0
.
2
6
5
.
8
0
.
4
1
0
I
t
0
.
0
4
"
2
0
.
9
6
5
.
8
0
.
4
1
0
I
t
0
.
0
4
"
0
.
0
8
u
4
2
.
1
4
3
.
9
0
.
7
2
1
I
t
0
.
0
7
"
4
2
.
3
4
4
.
4
0
.
7
1
4
"
0
.
0
7
"
0
.
1
4
"
7
6
.
1
9
.
9
0
.
9
8
5
"
0
.
1
0
"
7
5
.
4
1
1
.
3
0
.
9
8
1
"
0
.
1
0
"
0
.
2
0
"
1
1
9
.
9

3
3
.
9
0
.
8
3
0
I
I
0
.
0
8
"
1
1
7
.
8

3
1
.
1
0
.
8
5
6
I
t
0
.
0
9
"
0
.
1
7
7
9
.
5
1
1
9
.
9

4
0
.
4
0
.
7
6
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
9
9
7
9
.
2
1
1
7
.
8

3
8
.
6
0
.
7
8
2
0
.
5
9
0
.
4
6
0
.
0
4
1
.
4
9
"
1
5
3
.
8

7
4
.
3
0
.
2
7
1
"
0
.
3
5
"
1
5
1
.
4

7
2
.
2
0
.
3
0
6
"
0
.
1
8
"
0
.
5
7
"
1
3
3
.
1

5
3
.
6
0
.
5
9
3
"
0
.
7
7
"
1
3
1
.
9

5
2
.
7
0
.
6
0
6
"
0
.
3
6
"
1
.
1
7
I
t
1
2
7
.
6

4
8
.
1
0
.
6
6
8
I
t
0
.
8
7
"
1
2
8
.
8

4
9
.
6
0
.
6
4
8
"
0
.
3
8
I
t
1
.
2
9
"
9
9
.
6

2
0
.
1
0
.
9
3
9
"
1
.
2
2
"
1
0
2
.
4

2
3
.
2
0
.
9
1
9
"
0
.
5
4
"
1
.
8
0
T
A
B
L
E
6
.
C
O
M
P
U
T
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
P
U
B
(
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
3
)
e
A
B
O
A
B
e
A
B
+
O
A
B
c
o
s
P
A
B
m
P
B
A
a
B
C
a
B
C
e
B
C

a
B
C
c
o
s
P
B
C
m
P
B
C
P
B
B
P
u
B
8
6
.
0
1
2
.
6
9
8
.
6

0
.
1
5
0
0
.
1
0

0
.
0
2
8
4
.
7
0
.
9
'
8
3
.
8
0
.
1
0
8
0
.
6
8
0
.
0
7
0
.
2
4
0
.
2
9
"
2
0
.
2
1
0
6
.
2

0
.
2
7
9
"

0
.
0
3
"
0
.
7
8
4
.
0
0
.
1
0
4
"
0
.
0
7
"
0
.
2
8
"
4
2
.
1
1
2
8
.
1

0
.
6
1
7
"

0
.
0
6
"
0
.
2
8
4
.
5
0
.
0
9
6
"
0
.
0
7
"
0
.
2
5
"
7
6
.
1
1
6
2
.
1

0
.
9
5
2
"

0
.
1
0
"

0
.
7
8
5
.
4
0
.
0
8
0
"
0
.
0
5
"
0
.
1
9
"
1
1
9
.
9
2
0
5
.
9

0
.
9
0
0
"

0
.
0
9
"

2
.
1
8
6
.
8
0
.
0
5
6
"
0
.
0
4
"
0
.
1
9
7
9
.
5
1
1
9
.
9
1
9
9
.
4

0
.
9
4
3
1
.
3
0
1

1
.
2
3
7
7
.
4

2
.
1
7
9
.
5
0
.
1
8
2
3
.
0
9
0
.
5
6
1
.
6
1
0
.
9
4
"
1
5
3
.
8
2
3
3
.
3

0
.
5
9
8
"

0
.
7
8
"

2
.
4
7
9
.
8
0
.
1
7
7
u
0
.
5
5
I
I
1
.
3
8
,
e
1
3
3
.
1
2
1
2
.
6

0
.
8
4
2
I
t

1
.
0
9
"

1
.
2
7
8
.
6
0
.
1
9
8
"
0
.
6
1
"
1
.
1
3
,
e
1
2
7
.
6
2
0
7
.
1

0
.
8
9
0
"

1
.
1
6
"
1
.
2
7
6
.
2
0
.
2
3
8
"
0
.
7
4
I
I
1
.
1
9
"
9
9
.
6
1
7
9
.
1

1
.
0
0
0
"

1
.
3
0
"
2
.
8
7
4
.
6
0
.
2
6
6
I
I
0
.
8
2
I
I
1
.
1
3
~ 0
0
o ~ ~ ~ ~ o z o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0
0
T
A
B
L
E
7
C
O
M
P
U
T
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
P
u
C
(
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
3
)
9
A
.
C
O
A
C
9
A
C
+
O
A
C
c
o
s
P
A
C
m
P
C
A
e
B
C
O
B
C
e
B
C
+
O
B
C
c
o
s
P
B
C
m
P
C
B
P
c
e
P
u
C
8
6
.
7
1
3
.
5
1
0
0
.
2

0
.
1
7
7
0
.
1
0

0
.
0
2
8
4
.
7
0
.
9
8
5
.
6
0
.
0
7
7
0
.
6
8
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
9
0
.
1
2
u
2
0
.
9
1
0
7
.
6

0
.
3
1
6
"

0
.
0
3
"
0
.
7
8
5
.
4
0
.
0
8
0
"
0
.
0
5
"
0
.
1
1
"
4
2
.
3
1
2
9
.
0

0
.
6
2
9
"

0
.
0
6
"
0
.
2
8
4
.
9
0
.
0
8
9
"
0
.
0
6
"
0
.
0
9
t
c
7
5
.
4
1
6
2
.
1

0
.
9
5
2
"

0
.
1
0
"

0
.
7
8
4
.
0
0
.
1
0
4
"
0
.
0
7
"
0
.
0
6
"
1
1
7
.
8
2
0
4
.
5

0
.
9
1
0
"

0
.
0
9
"

2
.
1
8
2
.
6
0
.
1
2
9
"
0
.
0
9
"
0
.
0
9
7
9
.
2
1
1
7
.
8
1
9
7
.
0

0
.
9
5
6
0
.
5
9

0
.
5
6
7
7
.
4

2
.
1
7
5
.
3
0
.
2
5
4
3
.
0
9
0
.
7
8
0
.
3
3
0
.
5
5
"
1
5
1
.
4
2
3
0
.
6

0
.
6
3
5
"

0
.
3
7
"

2
.
4
7
5
.
0
0
.
2
5
9
"
0
.
8
0
"
0
.
7
6
"
1
3
1
.
9
2
1
1
.
1

0
.
8
5
6
u

0
.
5
0
"

1
.
2
7
6
.
2
0
.
2
3
8
"
0
.
7
4
"
0
.
5
7
u
1
2
8
.
8
2
0
8
.
0

0
.
8
8
3
"

0
.
5
2
"
1
.
2
7
8
.
6
0
.
1
9
8
"
0
.
6
1
"
0
.
4
2
"
1
0
2
.
4
1
8
1
.
6

1
.
0
0
0
"

0
.
5
9
u
2
.
8
8
0
.
2
0
.
1
7
0
"
0
.
5
2
"
0
.
2
6
.
.
.
.
!
Z
~ ~ ~ .
.
.
.
.
Z c o o !
Z
t
j
.
.
.
.
.
t

3
.
.
.
.
.
o ~ .

~
106
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
TABLE 8
COMPUTATION OF 8A (EXAMPLE 3)
t
PiA
P
UA
P
aA
34.3PaA a8A 8A
(sec.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (elec. deg.) (elee. deg.) (elee. deg.)
0+
0.80 0.06 0.74 23.0
Oavg. 0.37 12.7
12.7
0.1
"
0.08 0.72 24.7 35.7
37.4
0.2
"
0.14 0.66 22.6 73.1
60.0
0.3
"
0.20 0.60 20.6 133.1
SO.6
0.4
"
0.17 213.7
0.4+
"
1.49
0.4 avg.
u
0.83 0.03 1.0
79.6
0.5
"
0.57 0.23 7.9 293.3
87.5
0.6 380.8
80.6
0.4 0.80 1.49 0.69 23.6 213.7
57.0
0.5
u
1.17 0.37 12.7 270.7
44.3
0.6
"
1.29 0.49 16.8 315.0
27.5
0.7
"
1.80 1.00 34.3 342.5
6.8
0.8 335.7
INITIAL OPERATING CONDITIONS
TABLE 9
COMPUTATION OF 8B (EXAMPLE 3)
107
t
PiB PuB PaB 5.14PaB A8B 8s
(see.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.) (elee. deg.)
0+
2.30 0.29 2.01 10.4
Oavg. 1.00 5.1
5.1
0.1
Ie
0.28 2.02 10.4 15.5
15.5
0.2
u
0.25 2.05 10.5 31.0
26.0
0.3
u
0.19 2.11 10.8 57.0
36.8
0.4
u
0.19 93.8
0.4+
u
0.94
0.4 avg.
ce
0.56 1.74 8.9
45.7
0.5
u
1.38 0.92 4.7 139.5
50.4
0.6 189.9
36.8
0.4 2.30 0.94 1.36 7.0 3.8
43.8
0.5
It
1.13 1.17 6.0 137.6
49.8
0.6
II
1.19 1.11 5.7 187.4
55.5
0.7
"
1.13 1.17 6.0 242.9
61.5
0.8
304.4
108 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
TABLE 10
COMPUTATION OF 8c (EXAMPLE 3)
t
Pie PuC PaC 13.5P
a
c t16c 6c
(sec.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (elec. deg.) (elec..deg.) (elec. deg.)
0+
0.90 0.12 0.78 9.5
oavg. 0.39 5.3
5.3
0.1
H
0.11 0.79 10.'7
14.8
16.0
0.2
H
0.09 0.81 10.9 30.8
26.9
0.3
"
0.06 0.84 11.3 57.7
38.2
0.4
"
0.09 95.9
0.4+
H
0.55
0.4 avg.
H
0.32 0.58 7.8
46.0
0.5
"
0.76 0.14 1.9 141.9
47.9
0.6 189.8
38.2
0.4 0.90 0.55 0.35 4.7 95.9
42.9
0.5
"
0.57 0.33 4.5 138.8
47.4
0.6
H
0.42 0.48 6.5 186.2
53.9
0.7
H
0.26 0.64 8.6 240.1
62.5
0.8 302.6
NETWORK REDUCTION BY CALCULATING BOARD 109
A goes out of step with machines Band C, although Band C stay together.
If the short circuit is cleared in 0.35 sec., the system is stable. Both condi
tions are apparent from Fig. 16 at 0.6 sec. The critical clearing time is be
tween 0.35 and 0.40 sec.
J
i 90
E
8
co
'is.
en
:a
..
oS!
Q
c
< 0
)
I I I
V
Cleared 0.40
..........
"
"
"
'..
'I
\
J
Cleared 0.35sec.
V
\
/
"
V
o 0.5 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 16. Swing curve in terms of angular difference between machines A and B.
(Example 3.)
TABLE 11
SWINGCURVE DATA (EXAMPLE 3)
t 8,4 6B 80 8AB 8AO 8BO
(sec.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.)
0 23.0 10.4 9.5 12.6 13.5 0.9
0.1 35.7 15.5 14.8 20.2 20.9 0.7
0.2 73.1 31.0 30.8 42.1 42.3 0.2
0.3 133.1 57.0 57.7 76.1 75.4 0.7
0.4 213.7 93.8 95.9 119.9 117.8 2.1
0.5 293.3 139.5 141.9 153.8 151.4 2.4
0.6 380.8 189.9 189.8 190.9 191.0 0.1
0.5 270.7 137.6 138.8 133.1 131.9 1.2
0.6 315.0 187.4 186.2 127.6 128.8 1.2
0.7 342.5 242.9 2'40.1 99.6 102.4 2.8
0.8 335.7 304.4 302.6 31.3 33.1 1.8
Network reduction by use of calculating board. Sometimes, in
order to set up a network on a calculating board without exceeding the
number of impedance units available, the network or a portion of it
110 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
must be reduced to an equivalent circuit. If the identities of only two
terminals of the network, including neutral or ground if any branches
are connected to it, need be preserved, the network can be reduced to
one impedance element; if three terminals are to be preserved, it can be
reduced to an equivalent ~ (or Y) circuit; if four terminals, to an
equivalent sixelement mesh circuit; and so on.
The reduction may be accomplished by calculation, as already
described, or it may be done very simply with the help of a calculating
board. If the board method is to be used, the network is set up; one
(a) (b)
FIG. 17. Reduction of fourterminal network, set up on calculating board, to an
equivalent fourterminal mesh circuit by voltage and current measurements.
terminal of it is connected to a power source, and the other terminals
are connected through jumpers to the neutral bus as shown in Fig. I7a
for a fourterminal network. The applied voltage and the currents
leaving all other terminals are then measured in vector form. If the
equivalent circuit (Fig. 17b) were set up, it would yield the same meas
urements. As there would be no currents in the shortcircuited ele
ments (shown by broken lines in Fig. 17b), each terminal current
measured would equal the current in one of the remaining elements.
Hence the impedances of these elements are:
[48]
[49]
Now, if the voltage is applied between terminal 2 and terminals 1, 3,
and 4 joined together, and if similar measurements are made, we have:
E
2
E
2
E
2
Z12 =  J Z23 = , Z24 = 
11 1
3
1
4
COMBINING MACHINES 111
If similar measurements are made with the voltage applied to each
terminal in tum, every impedance' is determined twice (as indicated
for Z12 above), thereby furnishing a check on the work.
If resistance and capacitance are neglected, or if all impedance angles
are assumed equal, a dc. calculating board can be used in this manner
to determine the admittances in the powerangle equations, which are
then used in calculating the outputs of the machines. .
Combining machines. It is apparent from the foregoing discussion
and examples that the amount of work involved in making a stability
study increases tremendously as the number of synchronous machines
included becomes greater, especially if the network is solved algebrai
cally. In order to save work, it is important to keep to a minimum the
number of machines which are separately represented. Even on a
calculating board this number must not exceed the number of generator
units on the board. The number of machines may be reduced by
combining several machines which swing together or almost together to
form a single equivalent machine.
If several machines were mechanically coupled (at such speed ratios
that they ali generated the same frequency), they would be forced to
swing together, that is, to have equal velocities and accelerations, even
though they might not have equal angular positions. Since the inertia
constant may be defined as the power required to produce unit angular
acceleration, and since the power (or torque) required to produce equal
acceleration of all the machines is the sum of the powers (or torques)
required to accelerate the individual machines, the inertia constant of
the group is the sum of the inertia constants of the individual machines.
If the machines swing together even though not mechanically coupled,
conditions in the network are the same as if they were mechanically
coupled. Therefore, the inertia constant of the equivalent machine is
taken as the sum of the inertia constants of the individual machines (re
ferred to a common megavoltampere basettt if power is expressed in
per unit). It matters not whether the machines are forced to swing
together by close electrical coupling (lowimpedance between machines)
or whether they merely happen to swing together in spite of being far
apart electrically.
If the machines to be combined to form an equivalent machine are
connected in parallel at their terminals, then, by Thevenin's theorem,
their effect upon the network is the same as if they were replaced by a
single source of e.m.f., equal to the opencircuit voltage of the group of
machines, in series with a single impedance, equal to the impedance
tttAs stated in Chapter II, the inertia constant varies inversely as the megavolt
ampere base.
112 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
seen from the terminals when the e.m.f.'s of the machines are zero.
Therefore the impedance oj the equivalent machine is a reactance equal to
the parallel combination of the reactances of the individual machines (re
ferred, of course, to a common megavoltampere base if expressed in
per unit). The equivalent e.m.f, is a sort of average of the e.m.f.'s of
the individual machines. If the machines swing together, the equiva
lent e.m.f. is constant in magnitude and has the same frequency as the
e.m.f.'s of the machines. The e.m.f. of the equivalent machine is such
that the equivalent machine initially supplies to the network the same
active and reactive power as the group of machines that it replaces.
If the machines to be combined are not in parallel at their terminals,
their reactances cannot be combined. The fictitious points between
the reactance and the source of internal voltage of each machine are
connected together, however, thereby paralleling the several voltage
sources and connecting together at one end all the reactances, the
other ends of which go to different points of the network. The paral
leled voltage sources are replaced by a single source, which, as before,
is adjusted to deliver initially to the network the same active and
reactive power as the sources which it replaces. The division of this
power among the several points of connection to the network generally
will be different from the original division. The reactances of the
individual machines may be left as part of the network set up on a
calculating board; or, if desired, the network may be further reduced.
On the calculating board it is easy to combine machines when condi
tions justify so doing and later to separate them again or to form new
combinations as may seem desirable.fj]
The only conclusive test of whether machines may be combined in a
given case without too much error in the swing curves or in the con
clusions regarding system stability is to compute swing curves, first
with the machines not combined, and then again with them combined,
and to compare the results of the two computations. If the swing
curves obtained with the machines not combined show that a group of
machines swing very nearly together, however, this evidence is suffi
cient for concluding, without running the combined swing curves, that
the machines of the group may be combined with negligible effect on
the swing curves of the other machines. Neither of the foregoing
criteria for combining machines saves any work on the cases to which it
is applied; thus their only value is to give the computer experience
which should develop his judgment on the circumstances under which
combinations may be made. Therefore some further remarks are in
order.
tttAn example of this practice appears in Study 1, Chapter VII.
COMBINING MACHINES 113
The likelihood that machines will swing together is increased by a
decrease of impedance of the connections between them, by proximity
in their initial angular positions, by similarity of their inertia constants,
and by remoteness of the fault or source of the disturbance. It is
customary to combine all the machines in the same station (unless the
station is operated sectionalized), even though the machines have
unlike ratings, impedances, inertia constants, or initial loadings. Two
or more stations which are connected together by lowimpedance ties
may likewise be combined. Frequently an entire metropolitan system
is represented by a single equivalent machine if the study concerns the
stability of the connections between such a system and remote hydro
electric plants or other metropolitan systems.
EXAMPLE 4
The swing curves obtained in Example 3 show that machines Band C
swing very nearly together. Combine them to form a single equivalent
machine called D and compute swing curves of the resulting twomachine
system for the same conditions as those which hold in Example 3.
Solution. The inertia constant of the equivalent machine is
MD = M
B
+ Me = (19.5 + 7.4) 10
4
= 26.9 X 104 per unit
M
A
= 2.92 X 10
4
, as before
The time interval tJ.t for pointbypoint calculations will be taken as 0.10
sec., as in Example 3.
ilt
2
 = 34.3, as before
1t'IA
0.010 = 3.72
26.9 X 10
4
The initial conditions for the threemachine system, as calculated in
Example 1 and used in Example 3, are:
EA = 1.17
E
B
= 1.01
Ee = 1.00
0.04. = 23.0
OB = 10.4
Oc = 9.5
PiA = 0.80
PiB = 2.30
PiC = 0.90
The conditions for machine A still hold. The input and prefault output of
machine D is
PiD = PiB + Pie = 2.30 + 0.90 = 3.20
The values of E
B
and Ee are nearly equal, so the value of EDmay be taken
without serious error as equal to that of E
B
= 1.01. The value of OD will
lie between the values of OB = 10.4 and oe = 9.5, probably closer to the
114
SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
value of OB becauseB is a larger machinethan C. Aweighted average could
be used, thus:
~ D =~ B P B +~ c P c = lOA X 2.30+9.5 X 0.90 = 10.1"
PD 3.20
0.172/ 93.6
YAD = YAB +YAC = 0.086/94.0 +0.086/93.3
= 0.006  jO.086 0.005  jO.086
= 0.011  jO.172 = 0.172/93.6
YDO = YBO +yeo = 9.38/88.2 +3.91/87.9
= 0.30  j9.38 +0.15  j3.91 = 0.45  j13.29
= 13.3/ 88.0
The terminal admittances are:
YAA = j1.84 = 1.84/90.0, as before
YDD = YAD +YDO = 0.01  jO.17 +0.45  j13.29
= 0.44  j13.46 = 13.5/88.1
YAD = YAD = 0.172/93.6 = 0.172!86.4
COMBINING MACHINES 115
The powerangle equations are:
PuA = 1.17 X 1.01 X 0.172 cos (86.4  8A+8D)
= 0.203 cos (86.4  DAD) = 0.203 sin (3.6 + 8AD)
PuD = (1.01)2X 0.44 + 1.01 X 1.17 X 0.172 cos (86.4 +8AD)
= 0.45 +0.203sin (3.6  DAD)
Network reduction and powerangle equations, fault cleared. The reduced
network of the threemachine system with the fault cleared is shown in Fig.
(0)
1.62/100.6
(6)
o
FIG. 19. Reduction of the network of Fig. 14 by joining terminals Band C to
form terminal D. Short circuit cleared. (Example 4.)
14 and is redrawn in Fig. I9a with terminals Band C joined to give terminal
D. After making two parallel combinations, as follows, the network of
Fig. 19b is obtained.
YAD = YAB +YAe = 1.12/100.5 + 0.502/ 100.8
= 0.205  j1.10  0.093  jO.49 = 0.30  j1.59
= 1.62/100.6
fDO = YBO + yeo = 2.48/10.7 + 1.11/10.9
= 2.44  jO.46 +1.08  jO.21 = 3.52  jO.67
= 3.58/10.7
The terminal admittances are:
YA
A
= 0.03  j1.66 = 1.66/89.0, as before
YDD = YAD + YDO
= 0.30  jI.59 + 3.52  jO.67 = 3.22  j2.26
YAD = YAD = 1.62/100.6 = 1.62/79.4
T
A
B
L
E
1
2
C
O
M
P
U
T
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
P
u
A
A
N
D
P
u
D
(
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
4
)
S
A
D
,
B
A
D
9
A
D
'
+
B
A
D
s
i
n
P
A
D
m
P
A
D
P
A
A
P
u
A
e
'

B
A
D
s
i
n
P
D
A
m
P
D
A
P
D
D
P
u
D
1
1
.
0
1
2
.
7
2
3
.
7
0
.
4
0
2
1
.
9
1
0
.
7
7
0
.
0
3
0
.
8
0

1
.
7

0
.
0
3
0
1
.
9
1

0
.
0
6
3
.
2
6
3
.
2
0
3
.
6
1
2
.
7
1
6
.
3
0
.
2
8
1
0
.
2
0
3
0
.
0
5
7
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
5
7

9
.
1

0
.
1
5
8
0
.
2
0
3

0
.
0
3
0
.
4
5
0
.
4
2
"
2
0
.
2
2
3
.
8
0
.
4
0
4
"
0
.
0
8
2
"
0
.
0
8
2

1
6
.
6

0
.
2
8
6
"

0
.
0
6
"
0
.
3
9
I
I
4
1
.
9
4
5
.
5
0
.
7
1
3
"
0
.
1
4
5
u
0
.
1
4
5

3
8
.
3

0
.
6
2
0
"

0
.
1
3
"
0
.
3
2
"
7
5
.
3
7
8
.
9
0
.
9
8
r
"
0
.
1
9
9
"
0
.
1
9
9

7
1
.
7

0
.
9
4
9
u

0
.
1
9
"
0
.
2
6
I
I
1
1
8
.
4
1
2
2
.
0
0
.
8
4
8
"
0
.
1
7
2
u
0
.
1
7
2

1
1
4
.
8

0
.
9
0
8
"

0
.
1
8
"
0
.
2
7
1
0
.
6
1
1
8
.
4
1
2
9
.
0

0
.
7
7
7
1
.
9
1
1
.
4
8
5
0
.
0
4
1
.
5
2
5

1
0
7
.
8

0
.
9
5
2
1
.
9
1

1
.
8
3
3
.
2
8
1
.
4
5
u
1
5
1
.
1
1
6
1
.
7
0
.
3
1
4
"
0
.
6
0
"
0
.
6
4

1
4
0
.
5

0
.
6
3
6
"

1
.
2
2
"
2
.
0
6
I
I
1
3
0
.
2
1
4
0
.
8
0
.
6
3
2
"
1
.
2
1
"
1
.
2
5

1
1
9
.
6

0
.
8
7
0
u

1
.
6
6
"
1
.
6
2
I
I
1
2
0
.
7
1
3
1
.
3
0
.
7
5
1
"
1
.
4
3
"
1
.
4
7

1
1
0
.
1

0
.
9
3
9
"

1
.
7
9
"
1
.
4
9
c
c
8
1
.
8
9
2
.
4
0
.
9
9
9
"
1
.
9
1
"
1
.
9
5

7
1
.
2

0
.
9
4
7
"

1
.
8
1
"
1
.
4
7
.
.
.
S
~ ~ ~ f
o
o

4
o Z o ~ z ~ ~ o ~ p
:
:
0
0
COMBINING MACHINES
The powerangle equations are:
PuA = (1.17)2 X 0.03 +1.17 X 1.01 X 1.62 cos (79.4  6AD)
= 0.04 +1.91 siu (10.6 +8
AD
)
PuD = (1.01)2 X 3.22 +1.01 X 1.17 X 1.62 cos (79.4 +8AD)
= 3.28 +1.91 sin (10.6  8
AD
)
117
The computations of power are carried out in Table 12, and the computa
tions of swing curves, in Tables 13 and 14. The angular positions of the
two machines and the angular difference between them are tabulated as
functions of time in Table 15. The results agree fairly well with those for
the threemachine system, Table 11, Example 3.
TABLE 13
COMPUTATION OF 8A (EXAMPLE 4)
t
PiA
P
uA
P
aA
34.3PaA ~ 8 A 8A
(sec.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (elec. deg.) (elec, deg.) (elec, deg.)
0 0.800 0.800 0.00
0+
"
0.057 0.743
Oavg. 0.371 12.7 23.0
12.7
0.1
"
0.082 0.718 24.6 35.7
37.3
0.2
"
0.145 0.655 22.4 73.0
59.7
0.3
"
0.199 0.601 20.6 132.7
SO.3
0.4
u
0.172 213.0
0.4+
"
1.52
0.4 avg. 0.85 0.05 1.7
78.6
0.5
"
0.64 0.1e. 5.5 291.6
84.1
0.6 375.7
80.3
0.4
"
1.525 0.725 24.8 213.0
55.5
. 0.5
"
1.25 0.45 15.4 268.5
40.1
0.6
u
1.47 0.67 23.0 308.6
17.1
0.7
"
1.95 1.15 39.4 325.7
22.3
0.8 303.4
118 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
TABLE 14
COMPUTATION OF aD (EXAMPLE 4)
t
PiD PuD PaD 3.72P
aD AaD aD
(sec.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (p.u.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.) (elee. deg.)
0 3.20 3.20 0.00
0+
"
0.42 2.78
oavg. 1.39 5.2
5.2
10.3
0.1
"
0.39 2.81 10.4 15.5
15.6
0.2 .
"
0.32 2.88 10.7 31.1
26.3
0.3
"
0.26 2.94 10.9 57.4
37.2
0.4
"
0.27 94.6
'(>.4+
"
1.45
0.4 avg.
"
0.86 2.34 8.7
45.9
0.5 2.06 1.14 4.2
50.1
140.5
0.6 190.6
0.4
"
1.45 1.75 6.5
37.2
94.6
0.5
"
1.62 1.58 5.9
43.7
138.3
"
1.49 1.71 6.4
49.6
187.9 0.6
0.7
"
1.47 1.73 6.4
56.0
243.9
62.4
0.8 306.3
TABLE 15
SWINGCURVE DATA (EXAMPLE 4)
t aA aD aAD
(sec.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.) (elec. deg.)
0 23.0 10.3 12.7
0.1 35.7 15.5 20.2
0.2 73.0 31.1 41.9
0.3 132.7 57.4 75.3
0.4 213.0 94.6 118.4
0.5 291.6 140.5 151.1
0.6 375.7 190.6 185.1
0.5 268.5 138.3 130.2
0.6 308.6 187.9 120.7
0.7 325.7 243.9 81.8
0.8 303.4 306.3 2.9
REFERENCES 119
Treatment of synchronous condensers. In the calculation of swing
curves a synchronous condenser should logically be handled in the
same way as a generator. Its power output is zero initially but not
while it is swinging. When condensers are treated like generators, it is
often found that, although they swing with large amplitude and
shorter period than the generators, because of their smaller inertia
constants they have little effect on the swingof the generators. There
fore synchronous condensers are sometimes represented in transient
stability studies on a calculating board by static capacitors (or by
reactors if the condensers operate with lagging current). Each such
capacitor is in series with a reactor representing the transient reactance
of the condenser. At each step of the swingcalculation the capacitance
is readjusted so that its voltage, representing voltage behind transient
reactance, is restored to the initial value. Thus the reactive power of
the synchronous condenser is taken into account, but the active power
is disregarded. This procedure obviates the taking of power readings
and the calculation of the swing curve of the condenser. It affords
another method, in addition to that of combining machines, of reducing
the number of machines considered in a stability study.
REFERENCES
1. Electrical Transmission and Distribution Reference Book, by Central Station
Engineers of the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company, East Pitts
burgh, Pa., 1st edition, 1942.
a. Chapter 16, "Power Transformers and Reactors," by J. E. Hobson and R.
L. Witzke.
b. Appendix, Table 7, "Equivalent Circuits of Power and Regulating Trans
formers."
c. Chapter 3, "Characteristics of Aerial Lines," by Sherwin H. Wright and C.
F. Hall.
d. Chapter 6, "Electrical Characteristics of Cables," by H. N. Muller, Jr.
2. C. F. WAGNER and R. D. EVANS, Symmetrical Components, New York, Me
GrawHill Book Co., 1933.
a. Chapter VI, "Constants of Transformers."
b. Chapters VII, VIII, IX, which discuss constants of transmission lines.
c. Chapter X, "Constants of Cables."
d. Appendix VII, "Characteristics of Conductors."
3. EDITH CLARKE, Circuit Analysis of AC Power Systems, vol. I, New York,
John Wiley & Sons, 1943.
a. Chapter VI, "Transmission Circuits with Distributed Constants."
b. Chapter XI, "Impedances of Overhead Transmission Lines."
c. Chapter XII, "Capacitances of Overhead Transmission Lines."
4. A. BOYAJIAN, "Theory of ThreeCircuit Transformers," A.I.E.E. Trans.,
vol. 43, pp. 50828, February, 1924; disc., p. 529.
120 SOLUTION OF NETWORKS
5. O. G. C. DAHL, Electric CircuitsTheory and Applications, vol. I,
New York, McGrawHill Book Co., 1928. Chapter II, "Transformer Imped
ance and Equivalent Circuits."
6. F. M. STARR, "An Equivalent Circuit for the FourWinding Transformer,"
Gen. Elec. Rev., vol. 36, pp. 1502, March, 1933.
7. L. C. AICHER, JR., "A Useful Equivalent Circuit for a FiveWinding Trans
former," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 62, pp. 6670, February, 1943; disc., p. 385.
8. J. E. CLEM, "Equivalent Circuit Impedance of Regulating Transformers,"
A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 58, pp. 8713, 1939; disc., pp. 8734.
9. J. E. HOBSON and W. A. LEWIS, "Regulating Transformers in PowerSystem
Analysis," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 58, pp. 87483, 1939; disc., pp. 8836.
10. L. F. BLUME, G. CAMILLI, A. BOYAJIAN, and V. M. MONTSINGER, Trans
former Engineering, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1938.
11. L. F. Woodruff, Principles of Electric Power Transmission, New York,
John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, 1938. Equivalent T and r lines, pp. 1125.
12. L. F. WOODRUFF, "Complex Hyperbolic Function Charts," Elec. Eng., vol.
54, pp. 5504, May, 1935; disc., p. 1002, Sept., 1935. The charts are also published
in the book, Ref. 11.
13. C. A. STREIFUS, C. S. ROADHOUSE, and R. B. Gow, "Measured Electrical
Constants of 27QMile 154Kv. Transmission Line," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 63, pp.
53842, July, 1944; disc., pp. 13512.
14. DONALD M. SIMMONS, "Calculation of the Electrical Problems of Under
ground Cables," Elec. Jour., vol. 29, pp. 23741, 2837, 33640, 3958, 4236,
4707, 52730, May to November, 1932.
15. H. L. HAZEN, O. R. SCHURIG, and M. F. GARDNER, "The M.I.T. Network
Analyzer: Design and Application to Power System Problems," A.I.E.E. Trans.,
vol. 49, pp. 110213, July, 1930; disc., pp. 11134.
16. H. A. TRAVERS and W. W. PARKER, "An AlternatingCurrent Calculating
Board," Elec. Jour., vol. 27, pp. 26670, May, 1930.
17. H. P. KUEHNI and R. G. LORRAINE, etA New AC Network Analyzer,"
A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 57, pp. 6773, February, 1938; disc., pp. 41822, July, 1938.
18. H. A. THOMPSON, "A Stabilized Amplifier for Measurement Purposes,"
A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 57, pp. 37984, July, 1938.
19. W. W. PARKER, "The Modern AC Network Calculator," A.I.E.E. Trans.,
vol. 60, pp. 97782, November, 1941; disc., pp. 13958.
20. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company, Instruction Book on
AlternatingCurrent Network Calculator. These books, furnished to purchasers of
the calculators, are somewhat different for each model of the calculator.
21. General Electric Company, AC. Network Analyzer Manual, Publication
GET1285, Schenectady, 1945.
22. DAN BRAYMER, "Today's Network Calculators Will Plan Tomorrow's
Systems," Elec. Wld., vol. 125, pp. 524, January 5, 1946. Table I lists ac.
calculating boards existing or on order 'with ownership, date, frequency, number of
each type of circuit unit, and name and title of man in charge.
PROBLEMS ON CHAPTER m
1. By use of a Ttor conversion verify the rule stated in the text (p, 61)
for apportioning a small tapped load between the two ends of the line.
2. Write an expression for the impedance of a load in terms of its voltage
and vector power.
PROBLEMS
121
3. Verify the rule given (p. 58) for estimating the reactance of an auto
transformer.
4. Find the terminal admittances of the network of Fig. 10, considered as
a twomachine system, for a short circuit partially cleared by opening the
circuit breaker at the Patten end only.
5. Using the results of Probe 4 and Example 4, compute and plot swing
curves for determining to the nearest 0.05 sec. the critical time of opening
the breaker at Patten if the breaker at Dyche remains closed.
6. Work Example 2 for a new condition (c), short circuit partially cleared
by opening the circuit breaker at the Patten end only.
7. Using the results of Probe 6 and Example 3, compute and plot swing
curves for determining to the nearest 0.05 sec. the critical opening time of
the breaker at Patten to clear partially a threephase short circuit at X if
the breaker at Dyche remains closed.
8. Work Example 1 with the following changes: The two lines from
Murphy to Dyche (Fig. 10) are out of service. The initial generator out
puts are: Lunt, 105 Mw.; Murphy, 195 Mw.; Wieboldt, 100 Mw.
9. Work Example 2 for the condition described in Probe 8.
10. Calculate and plot swing curves for the threemachine system of
Fig. 10 with conditions as described in Probe 8 if a threephase short circuit
occurs at point X and is cleared in 0.30 sec. by opening breakers at both ends
of the line. The results of Probs. 8 and 9 are needed in the solution of this
problem.
CHAPTER IV
THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
Applicability of the equalarea criterion. To determine whether a
power system is stable after a disturbance, it is necessary, in general, to
plot and to inspect the swing curves. If these curves show that the
angle between any two machines tends to increase without limit, the
system, of course, is unstable. If, on the other hand, after all disturb
ances including switching have occurred, the angles between the two
machines of every possible pair reach maximum values and thereafter
decrease, it is probable, although not certain, that the system is stable.
Occasionally in a multimachine system one of the machines may stay
in step on the first swing and yet go out of step on the second swing
because the other machines are in different positions and react dif
ferently on the first machine.
In a twomachine system, under the usual assumptions of constant
input, no damping, and constant voltage behind transient reactance,
the angle between the machines either increases indefinitely or else,
after all disturbances have occurred, oscillates with constant amplitude.
In other words, the two machines either fall out of step on the first
swing or never. Under these conditions the observation that the
machines come to rest with respect to each other may be taken as
proof that the system is stable. There is a simple graphical method,
which will be explained in this chapter, of determining whether the
machines come to rest with respect to each other. This method is
known as the equalarea criterion for stability. When this criterion is
applicable, its use wholly or partially eliminates the need of computing
swing curves and thus saves a considerable amount of work. It is
applicable to any twomachine system for which the assumptions
stated above may be made.
The fact that the assumed conditions are not strictly true does not
necessarily invalidate the criterion. If the input to the machines is not
constant, but is changed by action of governors, the effect of such action
generally will not be appreciable until after the first swing and will then
be in such direction as to aid stability. Whatever damping is present
will reduce slightly the amplitude of the first swing and will reduce still
further the amplitude of subsequent swings.
122
APPLICABILITY OF EQUALAREA CRITERION 123
The effect of varying voltage behind transient reactance, Of, what is
the same thing, varying flux linkage of the field winding, deserves
consideration. Upon the occurrence of a fault the field current sud
denly increases to the extent required to offset the increased demagnet
izing reaction of the armature current and thereby to maintain constant
flux linkage of the field circuit. If the machine does not have a voltage
regulator, the field current ultimately decays back to its original value,
equal to the exciter voltage divided by the fieldcircuit resistance; and,
as it decays, the flux linkage also decays. The time constant of the
decay is of the order of 2 to 5 sec., and during the first swing the flux
linkages do not decrease much in any machine which does not go out of
step on that swing, If the fault is sustained for a long time, however,
the flux linkages may be so much reduced that the system, although
surviving the first swing, will ultimately become unstable. Even if the
fault is cleared rapidly, the opening of a line to clear it may decrease
the maximum synchronizing power and therefore increase the angular
displacement required for a given power transfer and decrease the flux
linkage for a given field current. Here, as well as for a sustained fault,
it is possible to have the machines stay in step during the first swingbut
go out of step later. If the system is stable on the first swing and also
stable in the ensuing steady state (under assumption of constant field
current), * it is reasonable to suppose that it will not be unstable at any
intermediate time; for there will probably be enough damping to
reduce the amplitude of swing as fast as the flux decays.
If the machines have voltage regulators, the regulators will tend to
maintain constant terminal voltage, which would require an increase
of field flux linkages. With excitation systems of ordinary speed of
response, the regulator and exciter action is too slow to have an ap
preciable effect during the first swing but is fast enough to prevent loss
of synchronism on subsequent swings. By the use of voltage regulators
it is possible to preserve stability even in some instances when the
system would be unstable on the basis of constant field current in the
steady state after clearing of the fault. t
From the foregoing discussion it may be seen that, if a twomachine
system does not lose synchronism during the first swing, it is very
probably stable, especially if the machines have voltage regulators, and
also that stability or instability on the first swing may be determined
with good accuracy under the assumptions of constant input, no damp
ing, and constant voltage behind transient reactance. The equalarea
*Steadystate stability is discussed in Chapter XV, Vol. III.
[Field decrement and voltageregulator action arc discussed in Chapters XII
and XIII, Vol. III.
[2]
[3]
124 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
criterion is a useful means of determining whether a twomachine
system is stable under these assumptions.
The equalarea criterion is applicable to all twomachine systems,
whether they actually have only two machines or whether they are
simplified representations of systems with more than two machines.
Twomachine systems may be divided into two types, which will be
considered in turn: (1) those having one finite machine swingingwith
respect to an infinite bus.] and (2) those having two finite machines
swinging with respect to each other.
One machine swinging with respect to an infinite bus. The swing
equation of the finite machine is
d
2
0
M  = p = p.  P [1]
dt2 a , u
where M is the inertia constant of the finite machine, and 8 is the
angular displacement of this machine with respect to the infinite bus.
Multiply each member of the equation by 2do/Mdt:
2 d 2 ~ d ~ = 2 Pa d ~
dt
2
dt M dt
or
:!. [(do)2] == 2 Pa do
dt dt M dt
Next multiply each side by dt, obtaining differentials instead of deriva
tives,
[4]
[5]
[6]
and integrate.
(
do) 2 = ~ r P a d ~
dt M Jao
d ~ = w' = '2r
a
Pdo
dt \j MJ; a
When the machine comes to rest with respect to the infinite busa,
condition which may be taken to indicate stability
w' = 0 [7]
tAn infinite bus is a source of voltage constant in phase, magnitude, and fre
quency and not affected by the amount of current drawn from it. It may be re
garded as a bus to which machines having an infinite aggregate rating are con
nected or, in other words, as a machine having zero impedance and infinite inertia.
A large power system often may be regarded as an infinite bus.
ONE MACHINE SWINGING TO INFINITE BUS 125
requiring that
r
J
80
Pet do = 0
[8]
This integral may be interpreted graphically (Fig. 1) as the area under
a curve of Pa plotted against 0 between limits 00, the initial angle, and
Om, the final angle; or, since
[9]
the integral may be interpreted also as the area between the curve of
Pi versus 0 and the curve of Pu
versus o. The curve of Pi versus P
ois a horizontal line, since Pi is
assumed constant. The curve of
Pu versus 0, known as a power
angle curve, is a sinusoid (derived
in the next section of this chap
ter) if the; network is linear and
if the machine is represented by 8
0
8
m
8
a constant reactance. The area,
FIG. 1. The equalarea criterion for
to be equal to zero, must consist stability.
of a positive portion AI, for
which Pi > P
u
, and an equal and opposite negative portion A
2
, for
which Pi < Pu. Hence originates the name, equalarea criterion for
stability.
The areas A1 and A?, may be interpreted in terms of kinetic energy.
The work done on a rotating body by a torque T acting through an
angle 0  00 is
[10]
and this work increases the kinetic energy of the body. The accelerat
ing power Pa is proportional to the torque, under the previously made
assumption of nearly constant speed. Hence the work done on the
machine to accelerate it, which appears as kinetic energy, is propor
tional to area At. When the accelerating power becomes negative
and the machine is retarded, this kinetic energy is given up; and, when
it is all given up, the machine has returned to its original speed. This
occurs when A
2
=At. The kinetic energies involved in this explana
tion are fictitious, being calculated in terms of the relative speed rather
than the actual speed.
126 THE EQUAL.AREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
The powerangle equation for the case of one machine and an infinite
bus follows directly from the powerangle equation for one machine of a
multimachine system Ceq. 17a, Chapter III) if we let subscript 1 denote
the finite machine and subscript 2 denote the infinite bus, and if we
put 01 = 0 and 02 = o.
P
u1
= E
1
2Y
l l cos 811 + E
1E2
Y12 cos (a12  0)
= Pc +PM sin (0  'Y)
[11]
where Pc = E
1
2Y
11 cos all.
PM = E
lE2
Y
12.
E
1
is the internal voltage of the machine.
E
2
is the voltage of the infinite bus.
Ylt/8l1 and Y12/812 are terminal admittances of the net
work between the machine and the infinite bus, as defined
in Chapter III.
'Y = 812  90.
The powerangle curve is, in general, a displaced sinusoid. It is
similar to the simple sinusoid
r, = PM sin 0 [12]
displaced upward by a distance Pc and to the right by a distance
'Y. = a12  90, as shown in Fig.
2. (NOTE: For a network con
sisting of resistance and induc
tive reactance, 8
12
lies between
90 and 180, 'Y lies between 0
and 90, and all lies between
o and  90. For a network
consisting of inductive react
" ance only, 812 = 90, 'Y = 0,
and 811 = 90.)
If the network consists of
reactance only, then eq. 11 re
duces to eq. 12, and the power
FIG. 2. Powerangle curve of dissipative angle curve is an undisplaced
network: a displaced sinusoid. The verti sinusoid.
cal displacement is Pa, and the horizontal
displacement is ~ . Applications of the criterion.
The use of the equalarea
method will be illustrated by applying it to two simple cases:
1. A sustained line fault.
APPLICATIONS OF THE CRITERION 127
2. A line fault cleared after the lapse of a certain time by the
simultaneous openingof the circuit breakers at both ends of the line.
The fault is assumed to occur at point X of the simple system of
Fig. 3, which consists of a generator connected through a double
)(
Fault
Generator Infinite
bus
FIG. 3. Power system consisting of a generator connected through a double
circuit line to an infinite bus. The equalarea criterion for stability of this system
is illustrated in Figs. 4, 5, and 6.
circuit line to an infinite bus. The input to the generator and the
voltage behind transient reactance are assumed constant.
1. Sustained line fault. The powerangle curves, giving the gener
ator output versus displacement angle, are shown in Fig. 4 for two
p
P
ml
Output, normal
conditions
Pm2
o
FIG. 4. The equalarea criterion applied to a sustained fault on the power system
of Fig. 3. The generator swings from the initial angle 8
0
to the maximum angle
8
m
determined by equality of areas Al and A
2
The system is stable when trans
mitting power Pi.
conditions: (1) normal, and (2) faulted. The horizontal line at dis
tance Pi above the axis represents the constant input. The initial
operating point is a at the intersection of the input and normal output
curves. The initial displacement angle is and the initial relative
angular velocity is zero. When the fault is applied, the operating
point drops to b, directly belowa on the fault output curve. The dis
128 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
placement angle remains 00 at the instant of fault application. There
is then an accelerating power, P
a
= Pi  Pi; represented by the
length abo As a consequence the generator is accelerated, the dis
placement angle increases, and the operating point moves along the
curve from b toward c. As it does so, the accelerating power and the
acceleration decrease, becoming zero at c. At this point, however, the
speed of the generator is greater than that of the infinite bus, and the
angle 0 continues to increase. As it does so, Pa becomes negative,
representing retarding power. The speed diminishes until at point d,
determined by the equality of area Al = abc and area A
2
= cde, it
becomes zero. Here the maximum angular displacement Om is reached.
There is still a retarding torque; therefore the speed of the generator
P
P
m2
Pi
o
FIG. 5. Application of the equalarea criterion to finding the power limit of the
power system of Fig. 3 with a sustained fault. The input line is raised from its
position in Fig. 4 until 8
m
reaches the intersection of the input line with the curve
of output, fault on.
continues to decrease, becoming less than that of the infinite bus. The
displacement angle 0 decreases, and the operating point moves from d
through c toward b. The system is stable. The operating point would
continue to oscillate between band d if there were no damping. Actu
ally the oscillations diminish, and the operating point finally becomes
established at c.
If the initial load on the generator were increased, as represented by
raising the input line, areas Al and A
2
and the maximum angle Om
would increase. The greatest value which Pi could have without the
machine going out of step during the existence of the fault would be
that value which makes Om occur at the intersection of the input curve
and the fault output curve, as shown in Fig. 5. This is the critical
condition in which both the speed and the acceleration become zero
simultaneously at angle Om. The value of Pi which makes this condi
tion occur is the transient stability limit.
If the initial load were still larger, then area A
2
in Fig. 5 would be
smaller than area A1. The generator would reach point e on the curve,
APPLICATIONS OF THE CRITERION 129
where the acceleration is zero, with the speed above normal. Con
sequently s would continue to increase, and, as it did so, the accelerat
ing power would again become positive. The system would be un
stable. In this case there is some retardation (between c and e), but
not enough to prevent loss of synchronism.
If input Pi were greater than Pm2, the maximum output with the
fault on, there would be no retardation whatever; and, of course, the
system would be unstable with a sustained fault.
p
P
ma

Pm2
o
8
FIG. 6. The equalarea criterion applied to the power system of Fig. 3 for a fault
cleared at angle oc.
2. Line fault with subsequent clearing. In this case three power
angle curves are needed: (1) for the normal or prefault condition with
the system intact, (2) for the fault condition, and (3) for the postfault
or cleared condition with the faulted line disconnected. These curves
are shown in Fig. 6.
As in case 1, the initial angle 00 is determined by the intersection of
the input line and the prefault output curve (point a). Application
of the fault causes the operating point to drop from a to bon the fault
output curve, and the accelerating power causes it to move along the
curve from b to c. We may assume that, when point c is reached, the
circuit breakers open, clearing the fault. The operating point then
jumps up to e on the postfault output curve and travels along that
curve to j, where area A
2
= defg equals area At = abed.
With a cleared fault, as with a sustained fault, a higher input (and
initial output) would cause point f to move to the right until at the
130 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
stability limit f would coincidewith h. Astill higher value of Pi would
lead to instability.
Another factor which would cause f to move to the right is an in
crease in the time of clearing the fault, resulting in a larger clearing
angle 6
c
For any given initial load there is a critical clearing angle.
If the actual clearing angle is smaller than the critical value, the system
is stable; if larger, the system is unstable.
Ordinarily, the clearing angle 6
c
is not known directly; instead, the
clearing time (sum of relay time and breaker time) is known. To
determine the clearing angle from a knowledge of the clearing time, the
swingcurve must be determined up to the time of clearing. Aprecal
culated swing curve may be used for this purpose. (See Chapter V.)
The use of swing curves is not entirely eliminated but is reduced to
a minimum by the equalarea criterion.
3. Other applications of the equalarea criterion are left to the reader.
(See Problems at the end of this chapter.)
EXAMPLE 1
By using the equalarea criterion, find the critical clearing angle for the
conditions of Example 4, Chapter II. From the swing curve for a sustained
fault find the critical clearing time.
Solution. The network (shown in Fig. 8, Chapter II) has no resistance,
and the powerangle curves are therefore undisplaced sinusoids. In Exam
ple 4 of Chapter II the amplitudes of the curves were found to be 2.58,
0.936, and 2.06 per unit for the prefault, fault, and postfault conditions,
respectively. The input was 0.80 per unit. The three output curves and
the input line are plotted in Fig. 7. The initial operating point a lies at the
intersection of the input line and the prefault output curve, The initial
angular displacement 60, as determined from this intersection, is about 18
0
"
\
J
/ /
<,
Postfault output
,
\
1/
I
I Output during faUlt",
I
A
4
=  10.4 sq.
I I I
I I
all
I
Input
.c
v c"\ . I
I A
2
= 11.4sq. A
3
=3.3sq.
At = 19.3 sq.
I
\
I
"' I
I
I
13Soor
I
ISo
139
157
I
I
o
o 60 90 120 s, 150 s;
Angular displacement 8 (electrical degrees)
FIG. 7. Determination of critical clearing angle by the equalarea criterion.
(Example 1.)
1.0
point g, and then moves along this curve. As it moves from g to h; the
machine is retarded. The relative velocity will become zero when the net
area becomes zero. The critical condition is that in which the relative
velocity becomes zero just as the retarding power becomes zero. Geomet
rically, the condition is that in which the net area out to intersection h is
zero. This condition is found by sliding the vertical line efg from left to
right or from right to left until the area At +A
2
+As + A4 = o. This is
3.0
2.0
2.5
0.5
easily done in practice by counting squares in columns from d to the right
and from h to the left, accumulating totals as we go and finding where the
totals are equal and opposite or at least most nearly so. In the present
problem this equality occurs at 138 or 139, which is therefore the critical
clearing angle, ac. The shaded area in Fig. 7 is At + A
2
+ A
a
+ A
4
= 19.3  11.4 +3.3  10.4 = 0.8 O.
From the swing curve for a sustained fault (Fig. 9, Chapter II) we find
that the time corresponding to 0 = 138
0
is t = 0.61 sec. This is the critical
clearing time, t.,
It is interesting to note that the swing curve plotted for a clearing time of
0.60 sec. (clearing angle 136.2) indicates that the system is stable. The
[ ~ 3 a ]
132 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
maximum value of 0 on that curve is 147. For the critical clearing time of
0.61 sec. the maximum value of 0 is determined by the abscissa of inter
section h, Fig. 7, and is about 157. The swing curve for a clearing time of
0.65 sec. (clearing angle 146.7) shows that the system is unstable. Thus
there is good agreement between the critical clearing angle determined by
the equalarea criterion and that determined by swing curves calculated
point by point.
Two finite machines. A system having two finite machines may be
replaced by an equivalent system having one finite machine and an
infinite bus, so that the swing equations and swing curves of angular
displacement bet\veen the two machines are the same for both systems.
It is necessary to use an equivalent inertia constant, equivalent input,
and equivalent output for the equivalent finite machine. The equiv
alent inertia constant is a function of the inertia constants of the two
actual machines, and the equivalent input and output are functions of
the inertia constants, inputs, and outputs of the two actual machines.
The equivalent system will now be derived.
The swing equations of the t\VO finite machines are as follows:
d
2
0
1
~ a l ~ i l  Jlu1
dt
2
= M
1
= M
1
[ISb]
[14]
The relative angle
will be used, because its value is significant in,showing the stability or
instability of the twomachine system.
d
2
0 d
2
0
l
d
2
0
2
Pal ~ a2
dt
2
= dt
2
 dt
2
= M
1
 M
2
Multiply each side of the equation by M
1M2/(M1
+M
2
) , obtaining
M
lM2
d
2
0 M
2
Pal  M
1
Jl
a2
2=
M
1
+ M
2
dt
M
2Pui
 M
1Pu2
M
1
+'M
2
[15]
which may be written more simply as
d
2
0
M 2 = Ps = Pi  Pu,
dt
[16]
EQUIVALENT POWERANGLE CURVE 133
[17]
Equation 16 is identical in form with eq. 1 for a single finite machine
and an infinite bus. Here the equivalent input,
M
2
Pi l  M
1Pi 2
Pi = M
1
+M
2
and the equivalent output,
P
u
= M2PU1
 M1Pu2
Af
l
+ M
2
[18]
are weighted means of the inputs and outputs, respectively, of the t\VO
actual machines, with the signs of Pi2 and Pu2 reversed, the weights
being inversely as the inertia constants. The equivalent inertia
constant,
[19]
is smaller than the smaller inertia constant of the t\VO actual machines.
The law of combination of the inertia constants is similar to that for
the parallel combination of impedances. This law will appear reason
able if we note that the inertia constant is the accelerating power
divided by the acceleration and that in a twomachine system the
accelerating power of the generator is nearly equal (except in sign) to
that of the motor, while the relative acceleration is the sum of the ac
celeration of the generator and the retardation of the motor. This
situation is in contrast to that which prevails in finding the inertia
constant of a machine equivalent to a group of machines that swing
together (discussed in Chapter III). There the accelerating power of the
group is the sum of the accelerating powers of the individual machines,
and the accelerations of all machines are equal. Consequently, the
inertia constants combine like impedances in series.
Having obtained the equivalent system, we may investigate its
stability either by calculation of its swing curve or by use of the equal
area criterion. The equalarea criterion is the more convenient
method, but to apply it we must first obtain the powerangle curve of
the equivalent system.
Equivalent powerangle curve of two finite machines. The power
angle equations of a twomachine system are (by eqs, 17, Chapter
III):
P
ul
= E
1
2Y
11 cos 8
11
+ E
1E2
Y
12 cos (8
12
 01 +02) [20]
P'U2 = E
2El
Y2l cos (8
21
 02 + 01) + E
2
2Y
22 cos 8
22
[21]
Exactly equal in a purely reactive network, as explained later in the chapter.
134 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
Substitute these values of Pul and Pu2 into the expression for equiva
lent output (eq. 18), and let ~ = ~ 1  ~ 2 . The result is
P = M
2E1
2Y
ll cos ell  MIE22Y22 cos e
22
M
1+M2
+E1E2 Yd M2 cos (8  e12)  M1 cos (8+e12)] [22]
M
1+M2
The two cosine terms involving 8may be combined into a single cosine
term by considering each term as the horizontal projection of a vector
in the position for which the variable ~ is zero. Thus the first term and
the second term are, respectively, the horizontal projections of vectors
FIG. 8. Vector diagram used in the derivation of eqs. 23 to 26.
M2/812 and  MI!8
12.
(See Fig. 8.) In this position the hori
zontal projections are M
2
cos (812) = M
2
cos 812 and M
1
cos
812, and the sum is
[23]
The vertical projections are M
2
sin (8
12)
== M
2
sin 812 and
 M1 sin 812, and the sum is
V =  (M
1
+ M
2
) sin 812 [24]
The magnitude of the sum vector is
M" == VH
2
+ V
2
= V(M
2
 M
1
)2 cos
2
e
12
+ eM
I
+ M
2
)2 sin
2
e
12
== v' (M
1
2+M
2
2
) (cos
2
e
l2
+ sin
2
012)+2MIM2(sin2812COS2 8
12)
== VM
1
2
+M
2
2
 2M
1M2
cos 2812 [25]
and its phase angle is
" 1 V 1  (M! +M2 ) sin 812
8 = tan  = tan
H (M
2
 M
1
) cos 8
12
= tan
1
(:: ~ z: tan e 12) [26]
REACTANCE NETWORK
Hence eq. 22 may be written more simply as
P
u
= Pc + PM cos (0  e
/)
= Pc +PMsin (0  1')
where
Pc = M2E1
2Y
ll cos ell  MIE22Y22 cos e22
M
1+M2
is the vertical displacement (see Fig. 2), and
(
Ml + M
2
) 0
'Y = tan
1
M
1
_ M
2
tan e12  90
135
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
is the horizontal displacement, of a sinewave, the amplitude of which is
PM = E
1E2Y12M"
M
1+M2
E
1
E
2
Y12 VM
1
2
+ M
2
2
 2M
lM2
cos 2e12
==
M
1+M2
If weput M2 = 00, eqs. 28, 29, and 30 reduce to the values previously
derived for one finite machine and an infinite bus (eq. 11).
Reactance network. If the network to which the two machines are
connected contains only reactance, the powerangle equation and the
equation for equivalent input are considerably simplified. In this
case 8
1
1 = 822 = 90 and 812 = 90, giving cos 811 = cos 822
= 0, cos 2812 = 1, and tan 812 = 00. Hence Pc = 0, 'Y = 0, and
PM = E
lE2
YI 2. The powerangle curve is then an undisplaced
sinusoid,
[31]
which is identical to the powerangle curve for one machine connected
to an infinite bus through a reactance network. In other words, if the
network contains only reactance, the powerangle equation and curve
of a twomachine system are independent of the inertia constants of
the machines. If, however, the network contains resistance as well as
reactance, both the amplitude and displacement of the powerangle
curve depend on the inertia constants.
Since there are no losses in a reactance network, one of the two ma
chines must act as a generator and the other as a synchronous motor,
so that, if both are considered as generators, their outputs will be equal
and opposite:
Pu2 = Pul [32]
136 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
Initially the inputs are equal to the outputs:
Pit = Put
Pi2 = P
u2
[33]
[34]
giving equal and opposite inputs,
Pi2 = Pit [35]
Hence the equivalent input, as given by eq. 17, becomes
M2
P
it  Mt (  Pit)
Pi = M
1
+M
2
= P [36]
which is equal to the actual generator input. In similar fashion the
equivalent output, as given by eq. 18, becomes equal to the actual
generator output.
EXAMPLE 2
By use of the equalarea criterion determine the critical clearing angle of
the twomachine system of Example 4, Chapter III.
Solution. The following data are obtained from Example 4, Chapter
III:
MA = 2.92 X 10
4
per unit
MD = 26.9 X 104per unit
PiA = 0.80 unit power
PiD = 3.20 unit power
a
AO
= 23.0
aDO = 10.3
With the fault on
E
A
2y AA cos eAA = 0
ED
2y
DD cos aDD = 0.45 unit power
EAEDYAD = 0.203 unit power
SAD = 86.4
With the fault cleared
EA
2YAA
cos 8AA = 0.04 unit power
ED
2y
DD cos aDD = 3.28 unit power
EAEDYAD = 1.91 unit power
SAD = 79.4
From eq, 19 the equivalent inertia constant is
MAM
D
2.92 X 26.9 .
M = M,A +MD = 29.8 104 = 2.64 X 104 per unit
REACTANCE NETWORK
From eq. 17 the equivalent input is
p. _ MDPiA  MAPiD
, MA+ MD
26.9 X 0.80  2.92 X 3.20
29.8
21.5  9.35 12.15 0 41 it
=  = . unl power
29.8 29.8
The output powerangle equation is
P; == Po +PM sin (8  1)
where by eqs. 28, 29, and30
Po == MDEA
2YAA
cos eAA  MAED
2
y DD cos eDD
MA+MD
P _ E E Y "';MA
2
+ MD2  2MAMD cos 29AD
M  A D AD M
A
+ MD
1 == tan
1
(MA + MD tan e
AD
)  90
MA MD
For the faulted condition
P
26.9 X 0  2.92 X 0.45 0044.
c == = . unit power
29.8
P = 0.203 ...;(2.92)2+ (26.9)2 2 X 2.92 X 26.9 cos (2 X 86.4)
M 29.8
= 0.203 "';8 +722  157 cos 172.8
29.8
= 0.203 "';730  157 X (0.992)
29.8
= 0.203 "';730 +156 =0.203 v'886
29.8 29.8
== 0.203 unit power
== tan
1
( 29.8 tan86.4)  90
2.9  26.9
== _tan
t 29
.
8
X 15.9 _ 900
24.0
== tan
1
(19.7)  90 = 87.1  90 == 2.9
137
138 THE EQUAIrAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
For the cleared condition
Po = 26.9 X 0.04  2.92 X 3.28 = 1.1  12.9
29.8 29.8
11.8 3
=   =  O. 96 unit power
29.8
P = 1.91 V730  157cos 158.8
0
M 29.8
= 1.91 v730  157(0.932)
29.8
= 1.91 v730 +146 = 1.91 V876 = 1.89unit power
29.8 29.8
'Y = tan
1
( 29.8 tan 79.4)  90
24.0
= tan1 (29.8 X 5.34) _ 900
24.0
= tan
1
( 6.63)  90 = 81.4  90 = 8.6
Hence for the fault condition
P = 0.044 + 0.203sin (8+2.9)
and for the cleared condition
P
u
= 0.40 +1.89sin (8+8.6)
The powerangle curves are plotted in Fig. 9. Note that they are displaced
sine curves, the displacement being from 0 to 0' and from 0 to' 0". The
input line is also drawn. The initial angle is
8
0
= OAO  aDO = 23.0  10.3 = 12.7
This angle is marked on Fig. 9. The point on the input line at this value of 8
is the point representing the prefault operating condition. It lies on the
prefault powerangle curve, but there is no need of plotting any more of that
curve than this one point.
By application of the equalarea criterion, the critical clearing angle is
found to be oc = 100, and with clearing at this angle the maximum angular
displacement that is reached is Om = 146.
Let us see how well these values agree with the results obtained in Exam
ples 3 and 4 of Chapter III. In both these examples the system was found
to be stable if the fault was cleared in 0.35 sec. (clearing angle, approximately
96) and unstable if the fault was cleared in 0.40 sec. (clearing angle, 118).
SWING CURVE BY GRAPHICAL INTEGRATION 139
Thus, in these previous examples the clearing angle was found to be between
96 and 118, and the value found in the present example lies between these
limits. The equalarea criterion provides an easier method than we had
before of determining the critical clearing angle, but it does not enable us to
find directly the critical clearing time. From the swing curve for O.40sec.
clearing (Fig. 16 of Chapter III) we may read the timeO.36 sec.corre
sponding to the critical clearing angle of 100.
The clearing time of 0.35 sec. for which a swing curve was obtained and
plotted in Fig. 16 of Chapter III is seen to be only slightly below the critical
I
146
6".150
13'0 100
o
0
0 30 60 90 s, 120
Angular displacement 8(electrical degrees.)
FIG. 9. Powerangle curves and determination of critical clearing angle by use of
the equalarea criterion. (Example 2.)
1.00

c
::s
! 0.50
value. The maximum angle attained in Example 3 was 135 or 136, and
in Example 4, 131, whereas the maximum angle under the critical condition
is 146. The discrepancy between Examples 3 and 4 is not surprising in view
of the proximity to the critical condition, at which a very small difference in
accelerating torque changes a stable system into an unstable one
Determination of swing curve by graphical integration. The type of
disturbance which is most important in stability studies is a fault ap
plied and subsequently cleared. It is usually desired to determine
whether a system is stable with a given load and given faultclearing
time, to determine the stability limit for a given clearing time, or to
determine the critical clearing time for a given power. The equalarea
criterion by itself affords information on clearing angle but not on
clearing time. The clearing time, however, is of primary importance
because the circuit breakers and protective relays, by means of which
the fault is cleared, have definite operating times which are independent
of the angular displacements of the machines. Therefore, when the
[37]
140 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
equalarea criterion is used, it is necessary to find the clearing angle
when the clearing time is known, or vice versa. For this procedure
a swing curve, carried out as far as the point of clearing, is required.
The swing curve for this purpose may be obtained in at least three
different ways: (1) by pointbypoint calculation, (2) by graphical
integration, or (3) by selection of a curve from sets of precalculated
swing curves. Pointbypoint calculation was explained in Chapter
II; the method of graphical integration'' will be described in this sec
tion; and the use of precalculated curves will be discussed in Chapter
v.
It has already been pointed out, in deriving the equalarea criterion,
that the relative angular speed of a machine is given by:
dB J218
 =CJJ' =  Pada
dt AI ~
Graphically, the integral appearing in eq. 37 is the area under a curve of
Pa against 8 or between curves of Pi and Pu against 8; in other words,
the same area that was used in the equalarea criterion. In the pro
cess of applying the equalarea criterion the area may be determined as
a function of 8 by counting squares on the graph paper for successive
increments of 8. Or, if the power output is a sine function or other
simple function of the angle, the integral may be evaluated formally.
In either case w' as a function of Bmay be computed from the area by
means of eq, 37. By rearranging this equation we obtain:
dB
dt = ; [38]
CJJ
and by integrating we get:
[39]
Evaluation of this integral gives t as a function of 8; in other words, it
gives a swing curve.
If formal evaluation of this integral were possible, graphical methods
would be unnecessary. As a rule, however, eq. 39 cannot be formally
integrated even though eq. 37 can be. One simple case in which both
integrations can be done formally is that in which the accelerating
power P
a
is constant, Then
w' =~ 2 P a ( ~  8
0
) [40]
SWING CURVE BY GRAPHICAL INTEGRATION 141
and
[41]
In general, however, the integral of eq. 39 must be evaluated graph
ically. This may be done by plotting a curve of l/w' against 8 and
finding the area under the curve as a function of 8. Some difficulty
will be encountered in determining the area under the curve for values
of anear the initial value 8
0
and the maximum value 8m because, at
these values of 8, w' is zero and the ordinate of the curve, u, is ac
cordingly infinite, although the area under the curve is finite. This
difficulty can be avoided by assuming Pa to be constant over a small
range of a(until the curve of l/w' comes back on scale) and by using
eq. 41 to compute the time for the machine to swing through this range
of 8.
EXAMPLE 3
By means of graphical integration obtain the swing curves (a) for a sus
tained fault on the system of Example 4, Chapter II, and (b) for a fault
cleared in 0.4 sec. (These curves were previously computed by the point
bypoint method and were plotted in Fig. 9 of Chapter II.)
Solution. (a) The following data are obtained from Example 4 of
Chapter II:
Inertia constant, M = 2.56 X 10'
Initial angle, 8
0
= 18.1
0
Input, Pi = 0.80
Output during fault, P11 = 0.936 sin 8
Therefore the accelerating power during the fault is
Po = P,  P = 0.80  0.936 sin a
The area under the curve of Po against 8 is
Al = rP..da = r (0.80  0.936 sin8) da
J
40
JI8.1
=[0.808+0.936 X 57.3cos 8]:8.1'
=0.80a+53.6 cos 8  0.80 X 18.1  53.6cos 18.1
0
= 0.80a+53.6 cos 8 14.5  51.0
= 0.806+53.6 cos 6  65.5'\1nit power degrees
(a)
(b)
142 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
(57.3 is the conversion factor from radians to degrees.)
1 M X 10
4
 =  = seconds per degree
Wi 2A
1
Al
TABLE 1
(c)
COMPUTATION OF Al AND l/w' FOR SUSTAINED FAULT (EXAMPLE 3, PART a)
a
l/w'
cos 8 53.6cos 8 0.808 Sum Al
(msec,
(deg.)
per deg.)
18.1 0.951 51.0 14.5 65.5 0 ClO
20 0.940 50.4 16.0 66.4 0.9 12.0
25 0.906 48.5 20.0 68.5 3.0 6.5
30 0.866 46.4 24.0 70.4 4.9 5.1
45 0.707 37.9 36.0 73.9 8.4 3.9
60 0.500 26.8 48.0 74.8 9.3 3.7
75 0.259 13.9 60.0 73.9 8.4 3.9
90 0 0 72.0 72.0 6.5 4.4
105 0.259 13.9 84.0 70.1 4.6 5.3
120 0.500 26.8 96.0 69.2 3.7 5.9
135 0.707 37.9 108.0 70.1 4.6 5.3
150 0.866 46.4 120.0 73.6 8.1 4.0
165 0.966 51.8 132.0 80.2 14.7 3.0
180 1.000 53.6 144.0 90.4 24.9 2.3
Al and l/w' are computed in Table 1. A curve of l/w' versus 0 is plotted in
Fig. 10. This curve is "off scale" for values of 0 between 18.1 and 20.
The time required for the machine to swing through this angle is therefore
computed by eq. 41, using the value of P at 0 = 19 as a good approxima
tion to the average value of F; between = 18.1 and = 20.
P
a
(19) = 0.800  0.936 sin 19
= 0.800  0.936 X 0.326
= 0.800  0.305 = 0.495 (d)
t =  = /2 X 2.56 X 104(20  18.1)
r. 0.495
= 0.044sec. (e)
The area A2under the curve for 10 increments of between 20 and 180 is
found by counting squares on the graph paper and is recorded in Table 2.
The cumulative total of the area, the time t, is also tabulated. The value of
t computed above for 0 = 20 is included. The total area out to any value
SWING CURVE BY GRAPHICAL INTEGRATION
143
: II
II
I ,
\ J
\ J
,
Before clearing"'"
u
,
/]
1/
 
J
)
. After
'"
r,
I
tr
.....
I
Afterclearing at 135
0
/
I I I
o
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
6 (electrical degrees)
FIG. 10. Curves for the determination of swing curves by graphical integration.
(Example 3.)
12
10
......
cu
!
8
"'0
...
8
en
6
"'0
c:
0
u
Q)
:E
'E
4

..j3
2
TABLE 2
TABULATION OF AREA A2 UNDER CURVE OF l/w' VERSUS 8 AND COMPUTATION OF
t FOR SUSTAINED FAULT (EXAMPLE 3, PART a)
a
A2 t a A2 t
(deg.) (sec.) (sec.) (deg.) (sec.) (sec.)
20 0.044 0.044 110 0.053 0.456
30 0.071 0.115 120 0.058 0.514
40 0.046 0.161 130 0.058 0.572
50 0.039 0.200 140 0.052 0.624
60 0.037 0.237 150 0.044 0.668
70 0.038 0.275 160 0.036 0.704
80 0.039 0.314 170 0.029 0.733
90 0.042 0.356 180 0.024 0.757
100 0.047 0.. 403
of arepresents the time for the machine to swing to that value of a. The
swing curve, 0 versus t, is plotted in Fig. 11. The points marked by small
circles were computed by pointbypoint method 2 with = 0.05 sec.
The two methods give results which agree well.
(b) From Example 4 of Chapter II the output after clearing of the fault is
P
u
= 2.06 sino
(j)
144 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
and the accelerating power is therefore
P; = Pi  PUt = 0.80  2.06 sino (g)
From part a of this exampIe the clearing angle corresponding to the specified
clearing time of 0.40 sec. is
(h)
0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1
fatult ......
.".
,
C)
r
,
l,/'
Fault cleared at 0.4sec.
./
\
.........
o
o
160
200
40
0.4 0.5
t (seconds)
FIG. 11. Swing curves determined by graphical integration. (Example 3.) Small
circles are points on swing curves computed point by point.
The area under the curve of Pa against from the clearing angle to any
subsequent angle 0 is
A
1
' = rpGda = t" (0.80 2.06sino)da
J8c JlOO
= [0.800+2.06 X 57.3cos0
= 0.800+ 118.0 cos  0.80 X 100  118.0(0.1736)
= 0.800+ 118.0 cos 0  80.0 + 20.5
= + 118.0 cos  59.5 (i)
The area before clearing, up to the clearing angle, is calculated from eq. bas
0.80 X 100 +53.6 cos 100
0
 65.5 = 80.0  9.3  65.5 = 5.2
Therefore the total area up to any angle subsequent to clearing is
A
l
= 5.2 + AI' = + 118.0 cos  54.3 (j)
Al and l/w' are computed in Table 3 eqs. j and c, respectively, and
1/w' is plotted as a function of 0 in the curve labeled "after clearing at
SWING CURVE BY GRAPHICAL INTEGRATION 145
100" in Fig. 10. It will be noted that this curve crosses the previous curve
(marked "before clearing") at 100.
TABLE 3
COMPUTATION OF At AND l/w' FOR FAULT CLEARED IN 0.4 SEC.
(EXAMPLE 3, PART b)
B
l/w'
(deg.)
cos 8 118.0 cos 8 0.808 Sum At (msec.
per deg.)
0 1.000 118.0 0 118.0 63.7 1.42
15 0.966 114.0 12.0 126.0 71.7 1.34
30 0.866 102.1 24.0 126.1 71.8 1.34
45 0.707 83.4 36.0 119.4 65.1 1.40
60 0.500 59.0 48.0 107.0 52.7 1.56
75 0.259 30.6 60.0 90.6 36.3 1.88
85 0.087 10.3 68.0 78.3 24.0 2.31
90 0 0 72.0 72.0 17.7 2.69
95 0.087 10.3 76.0 65.7 11.4 3.35
100 0.174 20.5 80.0 59.5 5.2 4.97
102 0.208 24.6 81.6 57.0 2.7 6.9
104.4 0.249 29.4 83.6 54.2 0.1
00
For a fault cleared at 0.4 sec. (100) the swing curve is found by taking t
equal to the area under the curves of l/w
'
versus 0, as follows: on the curve
marked "before clearing" to the intersection; thence on the curve marked
"after clearing at 100" to the maximum angle, which is found by setting
Al = 0 in eq. j. This angle is about 104.4. At this point w' changes from
positive to negative, and 1/ w' does likewise. The area under the curve of
negative values of 1/w', taken with negative increments of 0, is positive
and may be found equally well by using the curve plotted for positive values
of 1/w' Therefore the curve "after clearing" is followed back past the inter
section and as far as one cares to go. Ultimately w' again vanishes, and the
ordinate l/w' becomes infinite at some negative value of 0; however, the
curve in Fig. 10 is not drawn that far to the left.
The area under the curve in the neighborhood of the maximum angle, say
from 104.4 to 102, may be calculated by eq. 41. The value of P; at 103
will be assumed as the average value of P throughout this interval of o.
At 103, by eq. g,
P
a(103)
= 0.80  2.06 sin 103
0
= 0.80  2.06 X 0.974
= 0.80  2.00
= 1.20 (k)
t = /2 X 2.56 X 10
4(102
 104.4) = 0.032 sec. (l)
"'J 1.20
146 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
Equation 41 was derived on the assumption of initial velocity equal to zero,
which is true if 104.4 is taken as the initial angle. The time required for the
machine to swing from 102 to 104.4, however, is exactly equal to the time
required for it to swing back from 104.4 to 102.
The area A
2
under the curve of l/w' and the cumulative total of this area,
the time t, are entered in Table 4. The swing curve is plotted in Fig. 11.
TABLE 4
TABULATION OF AREA A2 UNDER CURVE OF 1I"l VERSUS aAND COMPUTATION OF
t FOR FAULT CLEARED IN 0.4 SEC. (EXAMPLE 3, PART b)
s A
2
t a
A2 t
(deg.) (sec.) (sec.) (deg.) (sec.) (sec.)
100 ..... 0.400 60. 0.016 0.579
102 0.011 0.411 50 0.015 0.594
104.4 0.032 0.443 40 0.014 0.608
102 0.032 0.475 30 0.014 0.622
100 0.011 0.486 20 0.013 0.635
90 0.035 0.521 10 0.013 0.648
80 0.023 0.544 0 0.014 0.662
70 0.019 0.563
This curve agrees well with the points (marked by small circles) computed by
pointbypoint method 2.
The curve of l/w' versus 0 and the swing curve for a fault cleared in 0.6
sec. (135) have also been plotted in Figs. 10 and 11. The swing curve does
not agree well with the one calculated by the pointbypoint method. The
clearing time and angle in this instance are so near the critical values that it
is likely that even small discrepancies lead to a considerable divergence of
the curves.
REFERENCES
1. R. H. PARK and E. H. BANCKER, "System Stability as a Design Problem,"
A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 43, pp. 17094, 1929.
2. H. H. SKILLING and M. H. YAMAKAWA, "A Graphical Solution of Transient
Stability," Elec. Eng., vol. 59, pp. 4625, November, 1940.
3. O. G. C. DAHL, Electric Power Circuits, vol. II, Power System Stability, New
York, McGrawHill Book Co., 1938, pp. 40112, 44350.
PROBLEMS ON CHAPTER IV
1. Show by diagrams how the equalarea criterion can be applied to
examine the stability. of a twomachine system subjected to the following
disturbances:
a. A line fault, cleared by the successive opening of two circuit breakers.
b. A fault on a radial feeder, cleared by disconnection of the feeder.
PROBLEMS
147
c. A line fault, cleared by the simultaneous opening of the circuit
breakers at both ends of the line, followed by the subsequent simultaneous
reclosing of the same breakers.
d. The opening of one circuit of a doublecircuit line as a normal switch
ing operation.
e. A sudden increase of shaft load on 3, synchronous motor.
2. A synchronous motor, supplied with electric power from an infinite bus
over a circuit of negligible resistance, is operating with an initial shaft load
Powhich is suddenly increased by an amount D.P. The powerangle curve
has an amplitude Pm. Derive a formula for the critical load increment
set; as a function of the initial load PO/Pm. 'Plot the equation. How
much error would there be in assuming that the equation could be rep
resented by a straight line between the two points where the true curve
intersects the axes of coordinates?
3. Derive a formula for the transient stability limit PL of a twomachine
reactance system subjected to a sustained fault, expressing the limit in
terms of the following quantities:
P = amplitude of prefault powerangle curve
flP
m
= amplitude of fault powerangle curve
a
o
= initial angular displacement
Plot a curve of PL/Pmagainst fl.
4. Derive a formula for the transient stability limit of a twomachine
reactance system subjected to a fault on a radial feeder and its subsequent
clearing by disconnection of the feeder at a clearing angle oC. Use the nota
tion given in Probe 3.
5. Derive a formula for the transient stability limit of a twomachine
reactance system subjected to a fault on a transmission, line and its subse
quent clearing by simultaneous opening of the circuit breakers at both ends
of the faulty line. The stability limit should be expressed in terms of the
quantities listed in Probe 3 and the following additional quantities:
r2Pm = amplitude of postfault powerangle curve
Oc = clearing angle
6. Find the critical clearing time of a threephase fault at the middle of
one transmission line of the twomachine system of Example 4, Chapter II,
if the initial output of the waterwheel generator is 25 Mw.
7. Find the transient stability limit of the twomachine system of Exam
ple 4, Chapter II, for a threephase fault at the middle of one transmission
line, cleared in 0.2 sec. by the simultaneous opening of both ends of the line.
Assume that the powerangle curves obtained in Example 4 are valid for any
value of initial power. (It would be more accurate, but more laborious, to
assume a different voltage behind transient reactance of the generator for
148 THE EQUALAREA CRITERION FOR STABILITY
each different value of initial power, so as to hold the initial terminal voltage
constant.)
8. Using the method of graphical integration, plot the swing curve of the
waterwheel generator of the system of Example 4, Chapter II, for an initial
output of 1.00 p.u, and a threephase fault at the middle of one transmission
line cleared in 0.35 sec. by the simultaneous opening of circuit breakers at
both ends of the line.
[1]
CHAPTER V
FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
Precalculated swing curves. This chapter continues the consider
ation of the problem of the stability of twomachine systems. The
equalarea .criterion, which was discussed in Chapter IV, is a very
effective means of determining whether a given twomachine system is
stable when subjected to a given disturbance. The most important
type of disturbance is the occurrence of a fault and its subsequent
clearing by the opening of circuit breakers. If the clearing time is
known, as it usually is, the corresponding clearing angle must be found
before the equalarea criterion can be applied; or, conversely, if the
critical clearing angle for a given transmitted power is obtained from
the equalarea criterion, the corresponding critical clearing time must
be found in order that the results of the stability study will be in the
most useful form.
Perhaps the simplest way to find the clearing angle corresponding to
a given clearing time, or the time corresponding to a given angle, is to
refer to the appropriate swing curve in a set of swing curves which have
already been calculated and plotted, and which may be appropriately
called "precalculated swing curves." Such a set of curves, obtained
by solving the swing equation on the M.I.T. integraph, was published
by Summers and McClure
2
and is reproduced here (Figs. 1 to 10) by
kind permission of Mr. McClure.
The curves were derived for a sustained fault on a system consisting
of a synchronous machine of finite size connected through reactance
to an infinite bus. By the methods presented in Chapter IV, however,
the precalculated curves can be used with a system of two finite ma
chines connected through any linear network. The usual simplifying
assumptions are made, to wit: constant input, no damping, and con
stant voltage behind directaxis transient reactance. To make the
curves generally applicable they are plotted in terms of a dimensionless
variable, the "modified time" T, defined by eq. 11 below.
The swing equation of a twomachine system is
d
2
a
M dt
2
= Pa =Pi  Pu
149
150 THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
[3]
M1M2 equivalent inertia constant in megajoule
where M = M1 +M2 = seconds per electrical degree. [2]
o= 01  02 = angular displacement in electrical degrees.
t = time in seconds.
P
M2Pil  M
1
P
i 2 1
i = M M = equrva ent Input In megawatts
1 + 2
which, either for a reactance network or for M2 = 00, reduces to
Pi = Pil = input of machine 1 (the generator) [4]
The equivalent power output, dependent on a, is given by the power
angle equation:
which, for a reactance network, reduces to
P = PM sino
[5]
[6]
Expressions for Pc, 'Y, and PM are given by eqs. 28, 29, and 30 of
Chapter IV. For a reactance network the amplitude of the power
angle curve is
[7]
where X12 is the reactance connecting machines 1 and 2, including the
directaxis transient reactances of the machines themselves.
Substitution of eq. 5 into eq. 1 gives
d
2
8
M dt
2
= Pi  Po  PM sin (a. 7)
or
where
p/ = Pi  Po
0' = 0  'Y
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
To put eq. 8 into dimensionless form, divide it by PM and then intro
duce a quantity r, defined by
r;;:P; /7tJPM
T = t\)180 M = t\)' GH
PRECALCULATED SWING CURVES 151
[13]
[12]
where f = frequency in cycles per second.
GH = kinetic energy, in megajoules, of equivalent generator at
rated speed = 180fM.
The result is:
d
2 ~ ' P ,
r u i ., .,
180' dT2 = PM  sin 8 =P  sin 8
if a' is in electrical degrees, or simply
d 2 ~ '
u ~ ,
=pSIDu
d,,2
if a' is in electrical radians. Here
p/ Pi  Pc
p = PM = PM [14]
and 0' has been defined in eq. 10.
Adifferential equation has been obtained which is independent of the
inertia constants of the machines and of the constants of the network.
The solution of the equation depends on the ratio of the input to the
amplitude of the powerangle curve (both input and amplitude being
measured from the horizontal axis of symmetry of the sine curve if
the sine curve is displaced vertically) and on the initial angle 50' and
initial angular speed woo For the present purpose, swing curves for
a sustained fault are wanted; hence Pn, PM, and 'Y must be the con
stants of the powerangle equation for the faulted condition, and the
initial speed will always be zero. The solution then depends only upon
p (defined by eq. 14) and 00'.
Each family of curves in Figs. 1 to 10 is for a constant value of sin
00" the range covered being from 0 to 0.90 in steps of 0.10. The
individual curves in each family are for constant values of p, ranging in
each family from a minimum value slightly larger than the value of
sin 00' for that family up to a maximum of 3.00.
The procedure for using the precalculated curves to determine
critical clearing time from a given critical clearing angle may be sum
marized as follows:
1. The powerangle curve (Pc, PM, and 1') for the faulted condi
tion, the power input Pi, and the initial angle 00 are assumed tobe
known, because they are needed for finding the critical clearing
angle Dc by the equalarea criterion.
2. Compute p/ = Pi  Pc, P = p//P
M
, 00' = 00  1', sin 50"
and oc' = Dc  'Y.
152 THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
160
10
60
c
4(
40
20
2 3 4 5 6
Modified timeT
FIG. 1. sin 00' = O.
10
10 9 8 7
3 2
160 t+__t__
40
20
'0
60
c:
c(

120
Q)
"t:J
co 100 rttt..........
E ...1
U
80
4 5 6
Modified time T
FIG. 2. sin 00' = 0.10.
FIGS. 1 and 2. Precalculated swing curves (copied from Ref. 2 by permission).
PRECALCULATED SWING CURVES 153
10 9 8 7 4 5 6
Modified timeT
FIG. 3. sin 80' = 0.20.
3 2 1
40
160
....
en
e120
l
 100
a
! 80
:0
CD
60
<
10 9 8 7 3 2
160

en
120
bO
Q)
"'0
100
:s
o
Q)
a; 80 __
60
c::
<
20
40
4 5 6
Modified timeT
FIG. 4. sin 80' = 0.30.
FIGS. 3 and 4. Precalculated swing curves (copied from Ref. 2 by permission).
154 THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
10 9 8 7 3 4 5 6
Modified timeT
FIG. 5. sin 80' = 0.40.
2
160
40
20 t++...++t++t+++I+++i++I

U)
120
to
Q)
"0
100 1+........ #I.........
.s
u
Q)
80 .............
:0
60
c
c
10 9 8 7 3 2 1
o,O.........._......"'_......._ ..&._oIooA.o_oII .....&. ...._..&..._.............
o
160 t++
20 t+++++++I++++I++++Ioo+I
40

U)
! 120 t+.......... bIIlI",+++tftt+I'+f
"0
co 100
U
:s
u
Q)
:e 80
60
c
c(
4 5 6
Modified timeT
FIG. 6. sin 80' = 0.50.
FIGS. 5 and 6. Precalculated swing curves (copied from Ref. 2 by permission).
PRECALCULATED SWING CURVES 155
10 9 8
7 4 5 6
Modified timeT
FIG. 7. sin 00' = 0.60.
3 2
o
160I+t
20 J+++++lff++1++I+++++41

t 120
f
c
(ij 100
U
:a
80
60
c
<
en
120
c
B100
:a
(1)
80
"........ ..J""."'_a...""'....I.......LJ.,;.I..L_"'""""'&...'LIJ
o 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10
Modified time T
FIG. 8. sin 00' =0.70.
FIGS. 7 and 8. Precalculated swing curves (copied from Ref. 2 by permission).
156 THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
10 9 8 7 4 5 6
Modified timeT
3 2 1
o
FIG. 9. sin 00' = 0.80.
180
160
140
en
120
Q,)
'0
co 100
g
'0
Q,)
80
"0
60
c:
c:(
ltJt:
1/
j
8011) 00 II)
o " 11).'" "' ..
)
/
': ;;;; ;; n: j

J ; Q'11
7"
Ji7
JI/
1111 III Ii
/ if 'I
:Y r7
I
'1IJ
'I J '/J
If/
/
V
/
11//
"I
'II
II r V
/ IJvrII
if/
7
V V
JJ
flli rJjIfh '/ V
V
I
V/
V
V
f
""/
l;"
> 095

_""......
,.....

t..
r.
.......
40
20
o
o 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ro
Modified timeT
FIG. 10. sin 00' = 0.90.
FIGS. 9 and 10. Precalculated swing curves (copied from Ref. 2 by permission).
PRECALCULATED SWING CURVES
157
3. Compute the equivalent inertia constant M by eq. 2.
4. Find the family of curves for the proper value of sin 00' and the
individual curve for the proper value of p. Enter this curve with the
ordinate 0' = Oe' and read the corresponding abscissa T = T
e
Q:.!QrQ.:.lQ.
'V I 0.05 '\.i (b)
...
FIG. 18. Reduction of the network of Fig. 15 with a threephase short circuit at
the middle of one line. (Example 3.)
Solution. The network joining the two machines, which is considered to
consist of reactance only, is reduced as shown in Figs. 16, 17, and 18 for the
prefault and postfault conditions and for a fault at the middle of the line,
respectively. For the first two conditions the reduction is accomplished by
164 THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
/
'/
Pre fault......
V
"

......
)
4
,
"
I \
V Fault cieared
1/
1\
,
I
,
I )
/ V \
r\
/ I
\
IJ
1\
Fault at middle of line
r, \
II
<,
r,
at sending end
1.08
1.00
.
'c
::s
8

0.50
0.32
parallel and series combinations; for the third condition, by two yea con
versions and intervening series combinations. With a threephase fault at
the sending end of one line it is obvious, without reducing the network, that
no power can be transmitted, The resulting reactances between machines,
1.50
o
o 30 60 90 120 150 180
o(degrees)
FIG. 19. Determination of stability limit for instantaneous clearing of a fault at
either location and for a sustained fault at the middle of the line. (Example 3.)
and the amplitudes of the powerangle curves (PM = EAEB/X
AB
= l/XAB),
are as follows: .
Condition
Reactance
PM
(per unit)
(per unit)
Prefault
0.65
1.54
Postfault
0.85
1.18
Fault at middle
2.45
0.41
Fault at end co
0
The powerangle curves are plotted in Fig. 19. The stability limit for
instantaneous clearing is found by the equalarea criterion in the upper part
of this figure. The value thus found, 1.08 per unit, is correct for both fault
locations. The stability limit for a sustained fault at the middle of the line
is found in the lower part of Fig. 19; it is 0.32 per unit. The stability limit
for a sustained threephase fault at the end of the line is zero.
T
A
B
L
E
1
D
E
T
E
R
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
C
L
E
A
R
I
N
G
T
I
M
E
F
R
O
M
C
L
E
A
R
I
N
G
A
N
G
L
E
(
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
3
)
s
i
n
0
0
F
a
u
l
t
a
t
M
i
d
d
l
e
o
f
L
i
n
e
F
a
u
l
t
a
t
E
n
d
o
f
L
i
n
e
P
i
P
i
0
0
s
,
(
p
.
u
.
)
=

(
d
e
g
.
)
O
c
T
c
t
c
=
T
c
/
5
.
0
8
O
c

0
0
t
o
1
.
5
4
p
=
P
i
/
0
.
4
1
(
d
e
g
.
)
f
r
o
m
p
r
e

c
a
l
c
.
(
s
e
c
.
)
(
d
e
g
.
)
(
d
e
g
.
)
(
s
e
e
.
)
f
r
o
m
F
i
g
.
2
0
c
u
r
v
e
s
f
r
o
m
F
i
g
.
2
1
1
.
0
0
.
6
5
0
4
0
2
.
5
5
1
0
.
4
0
.
0
8
4
6
6
0
.
0
6
0
.
9
0
.
5
8
5
3
6
2
.
2
6
0
0
.
7
0
.
1
4
5
2
1
6
0
.
1
0
0
.
8
0
.
5
2
0
3
1
2
.
0
7
0
1
.
0
0
.
2
0
5
8
2
7
0
.
1
4
0
.
7
0
.
4
5
5
2
7
1
.
7
8
2
1
.
3
0
.
2
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0
.
6
0
.
3
9
0
2
3
1
.
5
9
5
1
.
6
0
.
3
1
7
5
5
2
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
0
.
3
2
5
1
9
1
.
2
1
1
1
2
.
2
0
.
4
3
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
0
.
4
0
.
2
6
0
1
5
1
.
0
1
3
0
3
.
1
0
.
6
1
9
5
8
0
0
.
3
3
0
.
3
5
0
.
2
2
8
1
3
0
.
8
5
1
4
4
6
.
0
1
.
1
8
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
0
.
2
0
.
1
3
0
8
.
,
.
.
,
.
,
.
.
1
2
0
1
1
2
0
.
5
6
0
.
1
0
.
0
6
5
4
.
.
.
.
,
.
,
.
'
1
3
8
1
3
4
0
.
8
6
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
3
2
1
.
.
.
.
'
.
,
.
.
1
5
0
1
4
9
1
.
2
8
t
r
j
~ a t

3
~ ~ d ~ a t
'
"
4
t
r
j
>

~ Z o ~ .
.
.
.
.
.
~ t
J
:
j
t

l
~
166 THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
Prefaulty
J 1/
I r.......
I
J.
0.32 11..1
Vi!
11111
I 11j.;
:.: ~ I Faultat middle of line I ! ............. \
~ I I I I I I I I I "r.... 1\
I, I I I I I I I ~
180 : 120: : 150
111 130 144
i i 60
4551
30 : : 90:
70 82 95
6 (degrees)
FIG. 20. Determination of stability limit as a function of clearing angle by use
of the equalarea. criterion, threephasefault at the middle of the line. Areas for
P = 0.50 are shaded. (Example3.)
Stability limits between 0.32 and 1.08 per unit are assumed with the fault
at the middle of the line, and the corresponding critical clearing times are
found in Fig. 20. Stability limits between 0 and 1.08 per unit are assumed
with the fault at the sending end of the line, and the corresponding critical
clearing times are found in Fig. 21. In both figures curves of stability limit
as a function of clearing angle are plotted. The values of clearing angle are
entered in Table 1.
The values of clearing time corresponding to these values of clearing angle
are found from the precalculated swing curves if the fault is at the middle
of the line and from eq. 15 if the fault is at the end of the line. In the first
case the numerical value of Tit is needed. Byeq. 11 it is
: = ~ 7 T ' ! P M = /7T' X 60 X 0,41 = 5.08
t GH '\j 3.0 X 1
In the second case we have from eq. 15
2GH (<<5
c
 5
0
)
180! r,
2 X 3.0 X 1 (<<5 c  50) =
180 X 60 Pi  P..
Details of the determination of clearing time are given in Table 1.
Curves of stability limit as a function of clearing time are plotted in Fig.
22
EFFECT OF FAULTCLEARING TIME 167
Prefault
V
J
f
17\

 
0'\:
1:___:___
cleared
 
, I
, I

I .. Stability limit _
, , I
I

 '  I

11
  '   
: I
I I I
, ,
I I I
I\..
I
if
' , I I I
"
I I
I I
I
I
I ,


7:;
t  1,
 ' I
,
I
: I
,
I I I 1'0..
,
I
I
I I
. ' .....
I I
Fault at end of line"
, I
!"
I I
V/
v/ r/ /ijj:
. 
1/'// 1'/// /// v/./
,
1.30
1.08
1.00

.=
c:
'"
e 0.50
o
o 30 : : : 60 90:
465258 75 95
o(degrees)
120
150
180
FIG. 21. Determination of stability limit as a function of clearing angle by use of
the equalarea criterion, threephase fault at the sending end of the line. Areas
for P = 0.20 and P = 1.00are shaded. (Example 3.)
1.4 ex>
0.5 1.0
Fault clearing time ( seconds)
'\
1\
1\\
\ f\
'\
1\
\
."
,
<,
\rFault at middle of line
11"
t\.
t'....
fll
,
I
I
==
'"
""""

:...
o
o
0.5
1.0
FIG. 22. Curve of stability limit as a function of faultclearing time for the system
of Fig. 15. (Example 3.)
168 THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
Curves for determining critical clearing time. A more direct way of
determining the critical clearing time of a fault on a twomachine
system than that described in the first part of this chapter has been
developed and described by Byrd and Pritchard.f Their method
facilitates the plotting of curves of stability limit as a function of fault
duration. It takes cognizance of the fact that the voltages behind
transient reactances, and hence the amplitudes of the powerangle
curves, usually vary with the power transmitted in a way determined
by operating practice. This fact was disregarded in our previous
discussion, although allowance could have been made for it.
In Byrd and Pritchard's method two assumptions are utilized in
addition to those which were made in developing the equalarea crite
rion. They are:
1. That the network is purely reactive.
2. That all circuit breakers which open to clear the fault do '80
simultaneously.
Both these assumptions are commonly, although not necessarily, made
in using the equalarea criterion in order to simplify the calculations.
The derivation of Byrd and Pritchard's method follows: Let the
powerangle curves of the twomachine reactance system be:
Before the fault: Pu, = Pm sin 0
During the fault: Pu, = T1P
m
sin a
After the fault: Pu, = T2Pm sin 0
[16]
[17]
[18]
In other words, Tl and T2 are the ratios of the amplitudes of the power
angle curves during and after the fault, respectively, to that before the
fault. Inasmuch as the amplitude of the powerangle curve of a
reactance network is given by eq. 7,
p _ E
1E2
m  X
12
[19]
[20]
it isapparent that fl and T2 may be expressed in terms of the reactances
between machines before, during, and after the fault, thus:
X12 before fault
T1 ==
X
12
during fault
X12 before fault
T2 ==
X12 after fault
[21]
CUltVES DETEltMINING CRITICAL CLEAItING TIME 169
It is also apparent that, if the internal voltages E
1
and E
2
should vary,
the amplitudes of all three powerangle curves would be changed
proportionately, and the ratios rl and r2 would not be affected.
The three powerangle curves and the input line Pi are drawn in
Fig. 14 so that the equalarea criterion may be used to find the critical
clearing angle oc. Ordinarily the two shaded areas are equated. It is
just as correct, however, to equate the irregular area under the heavy
line to the area of the rectangle below the input line. If this is done,
the following equation results, from which Oc can be found:
[22]
Upon setting Pi = Pm sin 00 and evaluating the integrals, eq. 22 be
comes:
(OmOO)Pm sin 80= rIPm(COSOccoSOO)r2Pm(COSomcosoc) [23]
(om  00) sin 00 = (r2  rl) cos Oc + rl cos 00  T2 cos Om [24]
(om  00) sin 00  Tl cos 00 +r2 cos Om
cos Oc = [25]
r2  rl
where
[26]
Thus, if TI, r2, and 00 are known, the critical clearing angle Oc can be
found from eqs, 25 and 26. The corresponding critical modified time
Tc can then be found from precalculated swing curves (Figs. 1 to 10)
which are solutions of the swing equation (13) in which 0' now is
simply 0 and p = (sin oO)/rl. The actual clearing time to in seconds
can be found from the equation
I GH
t
c
= T
c
1rrlPm = T
c
[27]
which differs from eq. 11 in that PMhas been replaced by TIPm, the new
symbol for the amplitude of the powerangle curve during the fault.
The steps which serve to determine T
c
as a function of Tl, T2, and sin
00 were carried out for many values of the independent variables, and
the results were plotted in the form of curves of T
c
versus r2 for constant
TI and sin 00. See Figs. 23 to 39. Each family of curves is for a con
stant value of sin 00, the range covered being from 0.10 to 0.90 in steps
of 0.05. The individual curves in each family are for constant values
of Tl.
170
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
J I
I I Tl I J rr
0
,"""l
I!! 8
&t)1
8
.....
10 ..... .....
0
10 0 0
"
11 II
"
II j
.......
c:
,,"'rJ
"... ,
.....
II
I'
r
I
I'
J J J J
II III II
r,
If..
r
"
.,
II II r1 'I
().
'I I.J
//
'I
II
l...l
1...oIl L..I
.... L.".1iiJ" I.....l .....
looII ....
LL . ...
o
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
FIG. 23. sin 80 =0.10.
I I I I IIJ I
,
l II I I I
iH&t)
I II
0
i&t)
8l
It') ..... ", f1 C\I f 1('),
0 ..... 0
.......... if .....
 : IJ
d ,"""0 _0
_1 0
1'
__ 0
0
"
f "
fII
"1
1 .....
I "
" :
c: .......
f ........ J
:: c:
fI
, ........ ,
..... ...JI
'I I Ii
,
J I r 1
j
I'
"
II
, ,
I
,
I'
j
If 'I
.,
I II IJ
]
J
,
II IJ
"
..oil
v II' 1...oIl
v
"
"
l....l
II' L...II I....ll L
L...o ..... ' 11
.... 
o
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
FIG. 24. sin80 = 0.15.
FIGS. 23and 24. Curves for determination of clearing time (copied from Ref. 3
by permission).
CURVES DETERMINING CRITICAL CLEARING TIME 171
I I I I
I I ,
I I ,
1+10
iI
fir) :
I
,
It)
If? '
raj
0
.....

....
0
11'
i'
0 0'
'0 '
11
"
11
 II J II
iii
...0#
iI
=...'
4,.'" I 1...'"
iii ii
iir iI
 :
II
I
,
J J J
,
I I I
I
,
J /
2 J
I
,
"
v v
Ij
,,
"
l.",lI'ilI"""
..... ""'.",. i.ooo'ioooo' ....
.,
,"
10..... ".

...
..
...... ,..
T
t
 0.25_
T
c
FIG. 25. sin 80 =0.20.
1.0
0.8
... N 0.6
0.4
0.2
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
1.0
0.8
a!' 0.6
0.4
I
,
i
II
I I
i=

Ill)
01
1:fJt
.C?
f ..... t i
IdI'
 
1
o l
e
l
e:)
....
I CV
i C\J
"
/IT
II
i
"
II

I C:i J
... M
0#
a..'" J
a.....,1
a....,I:

 II 
II II
i i i
I

a.."" 
i
J..."",
I'
I
t
i
I/ / 'I II
J
"
II
I J J
,,
rJ'I.
,
IJ
'("
J II
I J
, ,
,
[.""II i.lIII .....
... ..... ........
1.1
...
". 1.1 ....
_...

... """
""" 
t
'T
c
FIG. 26. sin 80 = 0.25.
0.2
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
1.0
0.8
... " 0.6
0.4
1
t
W
I
I I I r
I I ,
t I I I , I I
, I
ttC:fJ
I
::r'
/fI
1I 0 IS
lili
Ir i 0
OJ 10
> t
i .... l
1
0.
'Ot
i_
f II
" I
II
:111
i
i II I
II 1
II
 ...
 a.. ...
c: j
Ii
 i.: 1
..."t:
i """Ji
1
,
1 I 'I
,
II I I IJ
r II v
'I
I I v
'"
, ,
.,
,

,

,
p
0.2
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
FIG. 27. sin 80 = 0.30.
FIGS. 25, 26, 27. Curves for determination of clearing time (copied from Ref. 3
by permission).
172
THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM

I I I .I
 0
2 2 9i>fil
1
:1
I
........
 0
1
...... 
 .... 11
/I II II II t II
1 O' J
1
0
,
....
 ....
 

 II _" If
" rj'


__ a..;
:c: ....... ..... 4.'"'f I
4.'"'f
j
' _
i
4.'"'f.,._
.....,/
J
.....,
I II 'I 1/ J v
II 'I J
"
If' v
"
v
I;'"
I" L."l
"
J v I...... I......
II J v l,;Ill IlllI' L.... 1... ......
J L."l
....
 
...... _I. ...
I I
I I
I
I I
1.0
0.8
...... 0.6
0.4
0.2
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
1.0
0.8
.... 0.6
0.4
FIG. 28. sin 80 =0.35.
I I I I I II I I I
I 1'
1/ I I I
1/
I II IIT:J:,.
11
[ .... f.
..... 1&0
........
 t:i
tt;
O'
...  O'
1..... O' II
O' 
11
11
II
II
.... ""1 1/ ....
P" 1/
.... .... II J
tt
'''''1} ...
\""if"
... c:
1 4."'f f
I
,
I
,
,
I I
,.
J
J
,
if"
,
J . .
l....IIlI
,'"
....
_.....

...
  '
T
c
FIG. 29. sin 80 =0.40.
0.2
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
T
c
FIG. 30. sin 80 = 0.45.
FIGS. 28, 29, 30. Curves for determination of clearing time (copied from Ref. 3
by permission).
CURVES DETERMINING CLEARING TIME
173
J II II I 1 II J IJ
I J 'I '(
II J J 'II] v J
11
I II I 1/ "J
II II 1
5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0
0.5 ''__ ..........,,'' ..... ...r....I
o
FIG. 31.. sin ao = 0.50.
... "
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
I I I
fS;
f1
I I II L
I I I
It)
'OJLL
11 'I
I f I
I 0
I I
10
0
o Oi'
I t;;:)'
tr II ,...
I "
"
" l
II : II
II
I II
I
"... ...
11
ti II II
c::r
I
"...
...............,
......., I
11
(,.....,
J l
I ....
" fo
'I 'I II If 'f
(..., lI
J J IJ IJ
rtfo ....
I II I T 1
I
,
i J v
j
, ,
v
I I II
,
"
'"
II J J
,
1.11
..,
l...oillill"'"
,
J I..
"
I 'I IlIlII'
..,

1..."
_........
I,
,,
L''
_....
_L ... ""'"
0.6
0.5
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
T
c
FIG. 32. sin ao = 0.55.
FIGB. 31 and 32. Curves for determination of clearing time (copied from Ref. 3
by permission).
174
...et 0.8
THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
II , __

FIG. 33. sin 80 = 0.60.
I I
I I I I I
s
t8 /f{
0
10 0 c;c; ()" <:>. f
t::)"
"
/I I/I zr q I" ... :::
II /t t.
/t
>0
c:
I.;.J , .... 1..."" J 1..."" """1
"...,::
,\'\0
l '('\!
I
,
I II I lA" I 1:1
0
_
J J I)
I I
1\L..;;;.....
I
,
,,
If II v ......
J If'
v:
'"
.....
.....
.... 
......
"""'10 ....
.... ..
.,
1.0
0.9
... " 0.8
0.7
0.6
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
1.Q
0.9
0.8
FIG. 34. sin 80 = 0.65.
I
l$qr!J
J
I , I I I J , II' ,
, ,
 0
Ort' I
I I
I
 

_0 o c::i Ci O'
I I ():"
 "
"I/Ht
Ht:
:rI/O"l
i " J
I If' I I I
......
""'J "14,....J 4,. ...tr
 v
v
0(",
'D,I
t I
,
.C'\ ___ ....
I II II 1...
I I
,
_....

",
.... 
...
_....
11""
0.7
o
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
FIG. 35. sin 80 = 0.70.
FIGS. 33, 34, 35. Curves for determination of clearing time (copied from Ref. 3
by permission).
CURVES DETERMINING CRITICAL CLEARING TIME 175
1.0
0.9
0.8
IIi}
I I
0'Yo
0:' If' T T
11
0 t::i O' O' o 0'
//'1
11
T o
u: :!J
,<,
'h...
....I 
.,
11
} II v
"
lIi"" ..... I......""
'I'
"
.""
1.. .....
J J I/'
'"
l..o""""
...
'I
.,.
jllIII"
'
io"'"
_I'"
0.7
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
FIG. 36. sin 00 =0.75.
030
r
'
= .
'1 =O. 0 rr
l
=0.40
oJ
1/
..
17
;L
a:t
Iio' 'r .1:
I ;!Ii Ci
" J
/t
'

t,"" 11
tt"
.""
"" 
"
11'1 I.' 1....1"'" I.. 1.1I ...... ... 1.......
L.
.... 11I""
r:r/: l..o.IlIl
... 
.......
'
..."'"'"
1
..... 1.:
1.0
0.9
T
c
FIG. 37. sin 00 =0.80.
0.8
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
1.00
0.95
0.90
o 0
W
co
'>
v
 n,
Ff
rt>  v
o ff
oep co'"
Alo,,,
"I"
I 1/ 1/ rlf fI //
 ?
I 4.. .... J"'r .... ,jf.....
'(,
............
l
I..;
r J I;' I;l'" I.l'"
II IJ l' I....
I...
j
J
"
I.l'" i...ll
ijll'"
I v

..... jllIII"
t
IJ 1....1 L....o .....
II""
....... "'"'"
JI
1....1 l.olII
T
c
FIG. 38. sin 00 = 0.85.
0.85
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
....
L....
II 0
.....
.....
ol
e::; O O +0'
" 
II " 1/
f
 ' '"
1\
.....
... " )
"...; 4..' ..... _"'" l0 ll""
, I v:

"'""',
... ",
Iiiiiii
I I.."
"

"'"

...... """'"
I
T
1.00
... 0.95
0.90
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
FIG. 39. sin 80 = 0.90.
FIGS. 36, 37, 38, 39. Curves for determination of clearing time (copied from Ref. 3
by permission).
176
THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.6
r
J
or r
2
0.3 0.2 0.1
Ii
J
v
1/
iJ
II'
1/
J
V
II
/
I ~
~
v
V
WI'"
I;"
v:
,.,
I ~
~
l.'
,.,
,.,
~
I'
''
l;l"
I ~
I#"
o
o
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.2
It is convenient to have an additional curve for determining the
stability limits for instantaneous clearing and for sustained faults. To
obtain the equation of such a curve refer to Fig. 12, which shows the
application of the equalarea criterion to the case of instantaneous
1.0
~
c 0.5
. ~
FIG. 40. Curve for determining the stability limit for a sustained fault or for a
fault cleared instantaneously (copied from Ref. 3 by permission).
clearing, and equate the area of the rectangle under the Pi line between
ao and 6
m
to the area under the postfault powerangle curve between
the same limits.
Area of rectangle = Pi(8
m
 60) = Pm(6m  60) sin 60
Area under powerangle curve =T2Pm 1
6m
sin ~ as =T2
P
m (cos ~ o  cos 8m)
Equating the two areas, we get
(am  a
o
) sin ~ o = T2(COS ao  cos ~ m ) [28]
CURVES DETERMINING CRITICAL CLEARING TIME 177
where 8
m
is as given by eq. 26. Equation 28 expresses implicitly a
relation between T2 and sin 8
0
which is plotted in Fig. 40. To find the
stability limit for instantaneous clearing, enter this curve with T2 and
read sin 8
0
Then the stability limit is Pm sin 8
0
The same curve can
be used to find the stability limit for
a sustained fault by entering it with P
the value of TI instead of T2; this be
comes evident when Fig. 13 is com
pared with Fig. 12.
It has already been mentioned
that, as the transmitted power (Pi ==
Pm sin 8
0
) varies, the internal voltages
E
1
and E
2
usually vary, and hence
Pm = E
1E2/X12
also varies. For the
present purpose the most useful way a0"'
to show these relations is to plot Pi sin 00
and Pm against sin 8
0
, as shown in F 41 T 1 f P d
10. . ypica curves 0 , an
Fig. 41. r; versus sin ~ o .
The procedure for obtaining a curve
of power limit as a function of fault duration by Byrd and Pritchard's
method will now be summarized.
1. Reduce the reactance network to an equivalent ~ between the
two machines and neutral for each of the three conditions:
a. Before the fault.
b. During the fault.
c. After clearing the fault.
Only the reactances X12 between the two machines are used in what
follows.
2. Compute the equivalent inertia constant M by eq. 2.
3. Calculate and plot curves (like those of Fig. 41) of
a. Pm = E
IE2/XI 2
versus sin 8
0
b. Initial power Pi versus sin 8
0
maintaining the bus voltages at the values which would be held in
actual operation.
4. Compute TI and T2 by eqs. 20 and 21.
5. a. Enter the curve of Fig. 40 with Tl and read sin 8
0
From
Fig. 41 read Pi corresponding to this value of sin 8
0
This is the
stability limit for a sustained fault.
b. Repeat, using T2 instead of TI. The value of Pi thus found is
the stability limit for instantaneous clearing.
178
THE TWOMACHINE SYSTEM
6. t Select values of sin 00 which are multiples of 0.05 and which
are between the values found in steps 5a and 5b. For each such
value of sin 00 find the proper family of curves from Figs. 23 to 39;
find the curve for the value of Tl; enter this curve with T2 and read
T
e
3
q
,
b
I
:
t
v
:
V
a
C
b
g

 (
a
)
.
.
.
.
1
0
.
.
.
.
.
t
v
o
Z
e
r
o

o
.
.
.
.
1
1
P
O
S
e
"
t
V
I
o
o
.
.
.
.
1
2
'
"
N
e
g
.
t
V
2

(
b
)
O
n
e

l
i
n
e

t
o

g
r
o
u
n
d
a
3
q
,
b c g
 (
c
)
:
:
M
o
Z
e
r
o
t
v
o

.
.
.
.
1
1
.
.
.
.
.
7
'
t
V
l
P
O
S
e
o
.
.
.
.
.
1
2
N
e
g
.
t
V
2
(
d
)
L
i
n
e

t
o

l
i
n
e
a
o

+


f
>

b
3
q
,
C
:
:
t
m
J
g
v
,
V
b
(
e
)
Z
e
r
o

t
.
.
.
.
r
'
r

V
o
1
1
.
.
.
.
P
a
s
.

t

,
V
I
1
2
.
.
.
.
.
N
e
g
.
.
,
V
2
(
I
)
T
w
o
l
i
n
e
t
o

g
r
o
u
n
d
a
I
C
I
3
q
,
6
r
,
3
q
,
b
I
b
c
o
c
t
I
e
C
t
I
e
g
g
V
b
V
o
V
e
a
V
"
v
,
V
a
(
g
)
(
i
)
m
1
0
I
1
f
.
1
Z
e
r
o
t
V
o
Z
e
r
o
H
v
o
0 Z 5
1
1
1
P
O
S
e
_
P
a
s
.
t
V
I
t
3
t
;
r
j
t
j
Z t
;
r
j
J

3
1
2
:
d
0
_
N
e
g
.
t
Y
2
 (
h
)
(
j
)
T
h
r
e
e

p
h
a
s
e
T
h
r
e
e
p
h
a
s
e
n
o
t
i
n
v
o
l
v
i
n
g
g
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
v
o
l
v
i
n
g
g
r
o
u
n
d
F
I
G
.
7
.
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
s
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
t
o
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
s
h
o
r
t
c
i
r
c
u
i
t
o
n
a
t
h
r
e
e

p
h
a
s
e
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
.
REPRESENTATION OF SHORT CIRCUITS 209
Substituting eqs. 41 and 42 into the expression for 1
0
in eq.22a, we
obtain
1
0
= 0 [44]
Substituting eq. 44 into the expressions for Ib and Ie in eqs, 21 and
substituting the results into eq. 42, we obtain
(a
2
+a) (11 +1
2
) = 0
or
[45]
Hence the relations between symmetrical components of voltage and
current for the linetoline short circuit are:
VI = V
2
11 +1
2
= 0
1
0
=0
[46a]
[46b]
[46c]
These relations are realized by a parallel connection oj the positive and
negativesequence networks, leaving the zerosequence network open
circuited. (See Fig. 7d.)
Twoline...toground short circuit on phases band c. (See Fig. 7e.)
The equations for phase voltages and currents are:
[47a]
[47b]
[47c]
These are like eqs. 34 to 36 for a onelinetoground short circuit,
except that voltage and current are interchanged. Therefore the
equations in symmetrical components will be like eqs. 39 except for an
interchange of voltage with current. They are:
10 +11 +12 = 0
V
o
= VI = V
2
[48a]
[48b]
These equations are realized by a parallel connection oj the three sequence
networks (Fig. 7f).
Threephase short circuit not involving ground. (See Fig. 7g.) The
equations of phase voltages and currents are:
Va = v, = v,
Ia +Ib+I, = 0
[49]
[50]
210 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
Substituting eqs. 49 into eqs. 20, we get
VI = V2 = iVa(l +a +a
2
) = 0
Substituting eq. 50 into eq. 22a for 1
0
:
1
0
= 0
Hence the equations of symmetrical components for this type of fault
are:
[5Ia]
[51b]
[5Ic]
[52a]
[52b]
[52c]
[53a]
[53b]
[53c]
They are satisfied by shortcircuiting the positive and negative
sequence networks and leaving the zerosequence network open
circuited (Fig. 7h).
Threephase short circuit involving ground. (See Fig. 7i.) The
equations of phase quantities are:
v, == 0
Vb == 0
v, = 0
The corresponding equations for symmetrical components are:
V
o
= 0
VI = 0
V
2
== 0
The equivalent circuit consists of a short circuit on each of the three
sequence networks (Fig. 7;).
Ordinarily no distinction need be made between the two types of
threephase short circuit, because the zerosequencenetwork is "dead"
whether or not its terminals are shortcircuited. The negative
sequence network is also dead during a threephase short circuit, and
the zerosequence network is dead during a linetoline short circuit.
These dead networks are shown in Fig. 7 for the sake of completeness,
but they are disregarded in fault calculations except in the rare in
stances where (1) the threephase network contains unsymmetrical
generated electromotive forces, or (2) there is a second fault or other
unbalance in addition to the one being considered.
Solution of faulted threephase networks by the method of sym
metrical components. Any threephase network which is symmetrical
SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS 211
throughout except for one unsymmetrical short circuit can be rep
resented by its three sequence networks connected at the point of fault
as shown in Fig. 7. When the appropriate connections have been
made, the current or voltage anywhere in anyone of the sequence net
works is equal to the corresponding component of current or voltage
at the corresponding point of the threephase network. If the values
of the phase currents and voltages are desired, they can be computed
by combining the sequence currents and voltages in accordance with
eqs. 15 and 21 or eqs. 23. In stability studies, however, the sym
metrical components usually suffice.
This method of solving a faulted threephase network is well suited
to the calculating board. After the three sequence networks have been
set up on the board, connections can be made readily for representing
any type of fault at any location. The sequence currents and voltages
can then be read by plugging in the measuring instruments.
If the network is not too complicated, it is feasible to solve it by
algebraic reduction of the sequence networks.
ExAMPLE 2
A linetoground short circuit occurs on bus D of the power system of Fig.
8a. Find the symmetrical components of current and voltage and the phase
currents and voltages throughout the network if the internal voltages of
generators A and B are equal and in phase, both having the value jl.05 per
unit. The sequence reactances in per unit are as marked on the sequence
networks of Fig. 8b, and resistances are assumed to be negligible. Generator
A is ungrounded; B has a solidly grounded neutral.
Solution. The short circuit is assumed to be on phase a. It is rep
resented by connecting the three sequence networks in series as shown by
the broken lines in Fig. Sb. Note that zerosequence current cannot flow
in ungrounded generator A; hence the zerosequence network is open at this
point (between Co and 0
0
, Fig. 8b).
The positivesequence network is reduced as shown in Fig. 9 to one e.m.f,
in series with one reactance. During the process of reduction the identity
of the e.m.f.'s of generators A and B is retained until step c, so that the re
sults can be used later inExample 3. Then, as the e.m.f.'s are assumed to be
equal in the present example, points Al and B
I
of Fig. 9c are joined to give
Fig. 9d. In Figs. 10 and 11 the negativesequence and zerosequence net
works, respectively, are reduced each to a single reactance. Then in Fig. 12
the three reduced networks are connected in series, as the original networks
were in Fig. 8, to represent the linetoground short circuit; and the com
bined circuit is further reduced to an e.m.f, and a reactance. In Fig. 13 the
current through the reactance is found by dividing the e.m.I, by the react
ance, and the voltages across the sequence networks are found by multiplying
the current by the respective reactances. The terminal voltages and cur
212 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
(a)
Positive Sequence Network
0
1
Negative Sequence Network
O
2
0.10
zeroSequence Network
00 0       '
(b)
FIG. 8. (a) Onelinediagram of a powersystem used to illustrate fault calculations.
(b) The sequence networks of the system with values of reactance in per unit
marked thereon. The sequence networks are connected by broken lines so as to
represent a linetoground short circuit at point D. (Example 2.)
SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS 213
Al 0.08 D
1
0.03 8
1
0.25 0.20
rv _0.13_ rv
(a)
1
(6)
(c)
(e)
(d)
0.216
01 01
FIG. 9. Reduction of positivesequence network (Example 2).
0.293
214
SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
0.08 D
2
0.03
(a)
(6)
D
2
0.01 D
2
(c) (d) (e)
0.09
0.193 0.136 0.08
02 02
FIG. 10. Reduction of negativesequence network (Example 2).
SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
0.14 Do 0.054
(a)
0.054
215
Do 0
0
0     ..
(b)
(d) 0.066
0
0
0.046 0.02
::::::::J (c)
FIG. 11. Reduction of zerosequencenetwork (Example 2).
105'
~ 1 D2 0.09 O2 Do0.066 00
r  V Y V ~   ~   ~
L ::= ..J (0)
jl.05
ctt::J
+ (b)
FIG. 12. (a) Connection of the reduced sequence networks to represent a line
toground fault. (b) Final reduction. (Example 2.)
..N 3.62
LV +il.OS:J
jO.57
216 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
il
~
3.62
.....
"
~ 
1.54 2.08
in
sfrv
in
0 ci
. ~ . ~
.....
1
(0) (b) (c)
FIG. 14. Determination of the positivesequence currents and voltages by re
expansion of the positivesequence network. See Fig. 9 for values of reactance.
(Example 2.)
SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS 217
rents of the sequence networks thus found are the symmetrical components
of the voltages at the point of fault and of the current in the fault.
Each sequence network is now reexpanded by going through the steps of
the network reduction backwards, finding all currents and voltages at each
~
D
2
~
D
2
3.62 3.62
3.62

~
1.50
~
2.12
2
3.62
(a)
(b)
2
(c)
D
2
Jo.041
3.62
1.50 I ( jO.06 jO.03) I 2.12
I 150 I 2.12 I
jO.23 t t jO.29 t jO.26
(d)
1.27 D
2
2.35
 jO.OJ ~ " " '  < f     '
.......+jO.03 2.12
0.23 jO.33 ~ /0.26
2 w)
FIG. 15. Determination of the negativesequence currents and voltages by re
expansion of the negativesequence network. See Fig. 10 for values of reactance.
(Example 2.)
step. This reexpansion is illustrated in Figs. 14, 15, and 16. Then in
Fig. 17 the sequence networks are redrawn with the values of the sequence
currents and voltages marked on them.
The phase currents and voltages are computed from their symmetrical
components in Table 1 by use of eqs, 23 and are shown on the circuit diagram
of Fig. 18. It should be noted that, since the generator e.m.f.'a were as
sumed to be imaginary (that is, 90 ahead of the reference phase), and since
the impedances of the network were assumed to be purely reactive, all the
sequence currents are real, and all the sequence voltages are imaginary. A
similar statement holds for phase a currents and voltages, but not for phases
band c.
218 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
(a)
3.62 3.62
Do 0<]0_<10.
!
jO.17 ~ I'0.07
jO.24 i
J
00'
3.08
0.54 Do 3.08
(b)
(e)
jO.08 jO.17
jO.24
ijO.l6 jO.09
(d)
0
FIG. 16. Determination of the zerosequence currents and voltages by reex
pansion of the zerosequence network. See Fig. 11 for values of reactance.
(Example 2.)
FIG. 17. Sequence currents and voltages in the power system of Fig. 8
(Example 2).
T
A
B
L
E
1
t
D
0
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
P
H
A
S
E
C
U
R
R
E
N
T
S
A
N
D
V
O
L
T
A
G
E
S
(
E
X
A
I
I
P
L
E
2
)
t
"
'
4
d t

3
.
.
.
.
.
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
s
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
s
0 Z
r


,
.
,
,
,
.
"
G
e
n
.
G
e
n
.
L
i
n
e
L
i
n
e
L
i
n
e
L
i
n
e
B
u
s
B
u
s
B
u
s
0 ~
A
B
C
D
C
E
E
D
t
E
D
S
C
D
E
~
1
1
1
.
5
4
2
.
0
8
1
.
2
9
0
.
2
5
1
.
1
6
1
.
1
6
j
O
.
6
7
j
O
.
5
7
j
O
.
M
>
1
2
1
.
5
0
2
.
1
2
1
.
2
7
0
.
2
3
1
.
1
7
1
.
1
7

j
O
.
2
3

j
O
.
3
3

j
O
.
2
6
d ~
1
1

1
2
0
.
0
4

0
.
0
4
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
2

0
.
0
1

0
.
0
1
j
O
.
9
0
j
O
.
9
0
j
O
.
9
0
t
.
'=
j
1
1
+
1
2
3
.
0
4
4
.
2
0
2
.
5
6
0
.
4
8
2
.
3
3
2
.
3
3
j
O
.
4
4
j
O
.
2
4
j
O
.
3
8
t
j
1
0
0
3
.
6
2
0
.
5
4

0
.
5
4
1
.
6
8
1
.
4
0

j
O
.
1
6

j
O
.
2
4

j
O
.
0
7
Z
r
,
3
.
0
4
7
.
8
2
3
.
1
0

0
.
0
6
4
.
0
1
3
.
7
3
j
O
.
2
8
0
j
O
.
3
1
t
.
'
=
j
t

3
!
(
1
1
+
1
2
)
1
.
5
2
2
.
1
0
1
.
2
8
0
.
2
4
1
.
1
6
1
.
1
6
j
O
.
2
2
j
O
.
1
2
j
O
.
1
9
=
a
1
0

!
(
I
l
+
1
2
)

1
.
5
2
1
.
5
2

0
.
7
4

0
.
7
8
0
.
5
2
0
.
2
4

j
O
.
3
8

j
O
.
3
6

j
O
.
2
6
0
0
.
8
6
6
(
1
1

1
2
)
0
.
0
3

0
.
0
3
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
2

0
.
0
1

0
.
0
1
j
O
.
7
S
j
O
.
7
S
j
O
.
7
8
~ ~ .
.
.
.
.
c
o
220 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
BusD
4.01+jO
0.52+jO.ot
O.52jO.Ol
BusE
10.86+jO
BusC
3.10+jO
0.74  jO.02
 0.74+jO.02
1.52 +jO.03 00 ~ ~
~ ~ ~
....... I I
+coco
0"":"":
00
I
\0\0
('t)('t)
000
.....................
+ I I
OcoCO
,,,,
00
I
O.06+jO
 0.78 j 0.02
 0.78+jO.02
\0\0
_NN
a ~ ~
....... I I
+ coco
0""
dd
I
FIG. 18. Phase currents and voltages in the network of Fig. 8 with a lineto
ground short circuit on phase a of bus D. Values of current in arrow direction
are marked on the horizontal lines; values of linetoground voltage, on the vertical
lines (busses). (Example 2.)
Fault shunts. Since the internal electromotive forces of a three
phase synchronous machine are of positive sequence, and since no
power results from the combination of positivesequence voltages with
negativesequence or zerosequence currents, the generated power of a
synchronous machine and the synchronizing power between the various
synchronous machines of a power system are positivesequence power.
Therefore the positivesequence network is of primary interest in a
stability study, and the zero and negativesequence networks are only
of secondary interest.
In the positivesequence network a short circuit can be represented
by connecting a shunt impedance Zpat the point of fault. The value
of ZF depends upon the type of fault and upon the impedances Zo and
Z2 of the negative and zerosequence networks as viewed from the
point of fault.
The formula for the impedance of the fault shunt may be determined
in either of two ways. The first way is by inspection of the connec
tions between the sequence networks for representing the various types
of short circuits (Fig. 7). The linetoground short circuit is rep
resented by connecting in shunt with the positivesequence network
FAULT SHUNTS
221
{57]
[56]
[541
[55J
Twolinetoground
Threephase
at the point of fault the series combination of the zerosequence and
negativesequencenetworks; the linetoline short circuit isrepresented
by thus connecting the negativesequence network only; and the
twolinetoground short circuit is represented by the parallel com
bination of the zero and negativesequence networks. Hence the
impedances of the fault shunts are as follows:
Type of Impedance of
Short Circuit Fault Shunt, Zl'
Linetoground Zo +Z2
Linetoline Z2
ZoZ2
z, +Z2
o
The second way of finding the impedance of the fault shunt is to
take the two equations
V
o
= ZoI
o
V
2
= Z2I2
[58]
[59]
which are independent of the type of fault, together with the three
equations giving relations between, or special values of, the sequence
currents and voltages at the fault, and to eliminate from the five equa
tions the four quantities V
o
, 1
0
, V
2
, 1
2
, thereby obtaining one equation
of the form
[601
[61J
For example, for a linetoground short circuit on phase a, eqs. 39 are
used. Substitution of.eqs. 58 and 59 into eq. 39a gives
ZoI
o
+VI  Z2
I2
= 0
VI = ZoI
o
+ Z2I2
By eq. 39b1
0
and 1
2
may be replaced by It, giving
VI = (Zo + Z2)I
I
By comparison of eqs. 60 and 61 the impedance of the fault shunt is
ZF = z, + Z2 [62]
agreeing with eq. 54. The same result would have been obtained if
the short circuit had been taken on phase b or c instead of on a.
It may be worth pointing out that, although the connections of
Fig. 7 are valid even if the zero or negativesequence networks contain
generated electromotive forces, the expressions given for the imped
222 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
ances of fault shunts are restricted to the normal condition, in which
such e.m.f.'s are lacking.
The positivesequence network with the fault shunt connected to it
may be reduced in the usual way to the simplest form of network con
necting the internal voltages of the synchronous machines. For a two
machine system the reduced network is, of course, a tJ. (or 1r).
EXAMPLE 3
Find the fault shunt for representing a linetoground short circuit on bus
D of the power system of Fig. 8, Example 2, and reduce the positivesequence
network (with shunt attached) to an equivalent 1f' between the two generator
0.293
(a)
(b)
(c)
FIG. 19. Reduction of positivesequence network with attached fault shunt of
reactance X, representing a linetoground short circuit on the power system of
Fig. 8 (Example 3.)
e.m.f.'s and neutral. Repeat for other types of short circuit at the same
location.
Solution. In Example 2 the zerosequence and negativesequence net
works were reduced to single impedances as viewed from the point of fault
(terminals D and 0). These impedances were Zo = jO.066 and Z2 = jO.09
per unit. For a linetoground short circuit the impedance of the fault
shunt is
Zp = Zo +Z2 = jO.066 +jO.09= jO.156 per unit
The positivesequence network was reduced as shown in Fig. 9, and in part
c of that figure it has been reduced as far as possible while still retaining the
EFFECT OF TYPE OF FAULT ON STABILITY 223
separate identities of generators A and B. In Fig. 19 the fault shunt is
attached, and the network is reduced to an equivalent 1r. Since all the
branches of this 1r are reactive, only the branch between A and B affects
the powerangle equation. The reactance of that branch, for a lineto
ground fault, is
X = 0.293 + 0.216 + 0.293 X 0.216 = 0.509 + 0.381
AB 0.010+'0.156
= 0.890 per unit
For any reactance XF of the fault shunt,
X = 0.509 + 0.0633
AB 0.010+ X,
Hence for a linetoline short circuit
X". = X
2
= 0.090
X 0
+
0.0633 +
AB = 0.5 9 0.100 = 0.509 0.633= 1.14 per unit
For a twolinetoground short circuit,
X,. = XoX2 = 0.066 X 0.090 = 0.038
x, + X
2
0.156
X
+
0.0633 +
AB = 0.509 0.048 = 0.509 1.32 = 1.83 per unit
For a threephase short circuit
X
F
= 0
X
+
0.0633 + 33
AB = 0.509 0.010 = 0.509 6. := 6.84 per umt
The reactance between generators A and B is lowest for the linetoground
fault, higher for the linetoline fault, still higher for the twolinetoground
fault, and highest of all for the threephase fault.
Effect of type of fault on stability. The lower the impedance of the
fault shunt, the less is the power exchanged between any two syn
chronous machines for a given angular displacement, and therefore
the lower is the stability limit for a given fault duration. In a two
machine system, such as that of Example 3, it is clear that the lower
the impedance of the fault shunt (connected in the shunt branch of the
T network of Fig. 19a), the higher is the impedance of that branch of
the reduced network which joins the two generators (branch AlB!)
Fig. 19c). The synchronizing power varies inversely as the impedance
of branch AIB
I.
Asimilar situation exists on a system of more than
two machines.
224 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
Comparison of the expressions for the impedances of the fault shunts
for the several types of short circuit (eqs. 54 to 57) shows that this
impedance is lowestindeed, is zerofor the threephase short circuit,
higher for the twolinetoground short circuit, still higher for the line
toline short circuit, and highest for the linetoground short circuit.
It follows that the most severe type of fault, as regards powersystem
stability, is the threephase short circuit, followedin order of decreasing
severity by the twolinetoground, linetoline, and onelinetoground
~
~ 0.5 J    +    +  + + ~ ~ ~ ~  +   i    +   f
~
e
0.5 0.8 00
Fault duration (seconds)
FIG. 20. Curves of stability limit as a function of fault duration for four types of
fault at the sending end of a line of the system of Fig. 15, Chapter V (Example 4).
short circuits. The relative severity of the various faults is shown to
advantage by curves of power limit versus fault duration, such as the
curves of Fig. 20. The difference in severity of the several types of
fault becomes smaller as the fault duration is decreased, but, even with
the fastest feasible clearing times, the difference is usually pronounced.
For zero clearing time (which is not attainable in practice) the power
limit is independent of the type of fault.
In making a stability study some judgment is necessary in choosing
the type of fault which is assumed to occur. The assumption of three
phase faults (the most severe type) gives conservative results and the
simplest computation. It is therefore a useful assumption when
comparing the effects of different fault locations, different system lay
outs, bussing arrangements, load conditions, and similar factors.
EFFECT OF TYPE OF FAULT ON STABILITY 225
However, threephase faults are of infrequent occurrence, especially on
highvoltage overhead lines on steel towers, and the power limits
determined on this assumption may be unduly pessimistic. For this
reason it has been common practice to assume twolinetoground faults
as the most severe condition likely to be encountered. In some loca
tions, such as on busses of isolatedphase construction, it would be
reasonable to assume that only linetoground faults could occur.
Linetoground faults are the type of most frequent occurrence, and
threephase faults, the least frequent. The relative and absolute
frequency of occurrence of the several types differs on different power
systems, depending largely on the type of line construction.
Sporn and Muller
4
give the following figures on the number of faults
of different types occurring on a group of transmission lines most of
which are operated at 132 kv.:
Linetoground 58
Twolinetoground 8
Threephase 6
Total 72
In designing a system or a modification of one to improve stability,
it appears logical to make estimates both of the value of various degrees
of reliability of service and of the cost of achieving them. Then it may
be determined whether the expense of any particular improvement of
reliability is warranted. If a certain system can be made stable during
threephase faults at reasonable cost, it may be worth doing; but, if the
expense is excessive, one may have to be satisfied with a system which
is stable during twolinetoground faults but not during threephase
faults. In another system for which the requirements of reliability
are not so stringent, instability during twolinetoground faults may
be tolerated provided that the system is stable during linetoground
faults. If still lower standards of reliability prevail, interruptions of
service can be expected from any type of fault.
EXAMPLE 4
Determine and plot stability limit in per unit as a function of fault duration
for each of the following types of short circuit at the sending end of one line
of the twomachine system of Fig. 15, Example 3, Chapter V: (a) oneline
toground, (b) linetoline, (c) twolinetoground.
Positivesequence reactances are given in Fig. 15 of Chapter V. Negative
and zerosequence reactances in per unit are as follows:
Generators: X
2
= 0.24, K = 0.06
Each transmission line: X
2
= 0.40, X
o
= 0.65
Receivingend transformers: X
2
= X
o
= 0.10
226 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
The transformers are connected Y ~ with neutral of primary windings
solidly grounded.
Solution. The negativesequence and zerosequence networks are shown
in Figs. 21a and 22a, respectively. They are reduced to single reactances
(d)
0.24 0.30
( O ) ~ (c)
i.l
33
(b)
FIG. 21. Reduction of the negativesequence network, fault at sending end of
line (Example 4).
0.65
0.06 0.425
(0) r:::=::J (c)
0.06 0.325 0.10
~ ( b )
(d)
FIG. 22. Reduction of the zerosequence network, fault at sending end of line
(Example 4).
in parts b, c, and d of those figures. The values of the reactances are
X
2
= 0.133 and K = 0.053 per unit.
The reactances of the fault shunts (X
F
) are:
Linetoground:
Linetoline:
Twolinetoground:
X
o
+ X
2
= 0.186 per unit
X
2
= 0.133 per unit
X
OX2
X
o
+X~ = 0.038 per unit
The positivesequence network is shown in Fig. 16a of Chapter V. With
the fault shunt attached to it at the proper point it becomes as shown in
Fig. 23a, and, after a Yd conversion, it is as shown in Fig. 23b. The
reactance of the branch connecting the two generator e.m.L's is
XAB = 0.35 +0.30 +0.35;F0.30 = 0.65 + 0 ~ ~ 5
EFFECT OF TYPE OF FAULT ON STABILITY 227
Upon substituting the values of X
F
given above, we get the following values
of XAB:
Linetoground: 1.22 per unit
Linetoline: 1.44 per unit
Twolinetoground: 3.41 per unit
0.65+ i ~ 5
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
(a) (b)
FIG. 23. Reduction of the positivesequence network with attached fault shunt of
reactance XI' (Example 4).
For the prefault condition (Chapter V, Fig. 16) X
AB
was 0.65 per unit,
and for the postfault condition (Chapter V, Fig. 17) it was 0.85 per unit.
Henee n and r2 have the following values:
Linetoground.
Linefoline:
Twolinetoground.
All typesojJault.
0.65 5
'1 = =0.3
1.22
rl = 0.65 = 0.45
1.44
rl = 0.65 = 0.19
3.41
0.65 7
'2== 0.6
0.85
Byrd and Pritchard's curves will now be used. From Fig. 40 of Chapter
V values of sin 8
0
are obtained, corresponding to the values of '1 and r2
above. The values of sin 00, multiplied by Pm = EAEB/X
AB
= 1.00
X 1.00/0.65 = 1.54 per unit, give the power limits for sustained fault and
for instantaneous clearing. These values have been entered in Table 2 in
the columns headed "sin 00" and Upi" on the lines for t
e
= 00 and to = o.
Values of sin 00 which are multiples of 0.05 and which lie between the
values already found for t
e
= 00 and for t
e
= 0 are selected. The curves
of Figs. 23 to 39 of Chapter V are entered with the proper values of sin 00,
rl, and '2, and the values of Teare read from the curves and written in Table
2. Values of Te/t
e
are calculated from eq. 27 of Chapter V, as follows:
~ == ~ 1 f f 1 ' 1 P ... == ~ 1 f X 60 X 1'1 X 1.54 == ~
to GH 1 X 3.00
and are written in Table 2. The critical clearing time to is then calculated
from T
e
+ Tc/t
e
228 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
TABLE 2
CALCULATION OF POWER LIMIT Pi AS A FUNCTION OF CLEARING TIME t
c
(EXAMPLE 4)
Type of Fault sin ~ o Pi = 1.54sin ~ o
"cltc t
t
c
(sec.)
0.456 0.70 7.15 00
0.50 0.77
"
3.65 0.51
Linetoground
0.55 0.85
"
2.45 0.34
rl = 0.53
0.60 0.92
It
1.70 0.24
r2 = 0.76
0.65 1.00
u
1.15 0.16
0.701 1.08
"
0
0.378 0.58 6.59 00
0.40 0.62
"
4.40 0.67
Linetoline 0.45 0.69
"
2.90 0.44
Tl = 0.45 0.50 0.77
"
2.20 0.33
r2 = 0.76 0.55 0.85
"
1.70 0.26
0.60 0.92
"
1.25 0.19
0.65 1.00
It
0.85 0.13
0.147 0.23 4.28 00
0.20 0.31
It
2.95 0.69
0.25 0.38
"
2.25 0.53
0.30 0.46
"
1.75 0.41
Twolinetoground 0.35 0.54
"
1.40 0.33
Tl = 0.19 0.40 0.62
"
1.20 0.28
T2 = 0.76 0.45 0.69
"
1.00 0.23
0.50 0.77
"
0.80 0.19
0.55 0.85
"
0.65 0.15
0.60 0.92
u
0.5 0.12
0.65 1.00
"
0.32 0.07
The results of the calculations are shown by the curves of Fig. 20. The
curve for a threephase fault has been copied into this figure from Fig. 22 of
Chapter V so that the effects of the four types of fault on stability may be
compared.
Effect of fault impedance. In the derivation of the connections
between the sequence networks for representing short circuits,. it was
assumed that the fault itself had no impedance. Actually the fault
may have some impedance, principally the resistance of the arc be
tween conductors. On highvoltage circuits this resistance is usually
negligible in comparison to the other impedances of the network, and
no allowance is made for it in calculation. * In ground faults there may
be additional resistance in the path to ground through the tower foot
*For valuesof arc resistance seefootnotein sectionon reactancerelaysin Chap
ter IX, Vol. II.
EFFECT OF FAULT IMPEDANCE
229
ing or through the object causing the fault. The value of this resist
ance varies widely, with a median value of around 20 ohms.
5
This
resistance also is usually neglected in stability studies, thereby simplify
ing calculation and giving results for the most severe condition.
If, for any reason, it is desirable, fault impedance may readily be
taken into account, as shown below.
Linetoground fault. Let F be the impedance of the fault between
conductor aand ground. To facilitate the analysis suppose that at the
point of fault there are attached to the threephase network three equal
impedances of value F, as shown in Fig. 24a. This artifice has the
advantage of making the threephase network symmetrical up to
point M, where a linetoground fault of zero impedance may be ap
plied. The added impedance F appears in each sequence network
between the point of fault and point M. Terminals 0 and M of the
sequence networks are then interconnected as shown in Fig. 24b to
represent a linetoground short circuit. Conditions inside the se
quence networks are not altered if an impedance 3F is connected in
series with the networks as shown in Fig. 24c instead of three separate
impedances of F each.
Linetoline fault. Let F be the impedance of the fault between
conductors band c. Suppose that the fault condition is represented
by connecting an impedance F/2 to each of the three conductors at the
point of fault and then applying the linetoline short circuit at the
other end of these impedances (point M, Fig. 24d). Such a connec
tion is equivalent to connecting impedance F/2 to the line terminal of
each sequence network and then connecting the positive and negative
sequence networks in parallel as shown in Fig. 24e. Of course, the two
impedances F/2 which are no,v in series are equivalent to a single
impedance F.
Twolinetoground fault. Let the impedance between conductors
band c be F
L
, and let the impedance to ground be Fa. For generality
Fa might be tapped onto any point of FL, but, as FL is usually much
smaller than FG, it will be sufficiently accurate for the present purpose
to assume that Fa is connected to the center point of F
L
, giving F
L/2
between the junction and each faulted conductor, as shown in Fig. 24f.
The impedance FG in the ground connection can be shown to be
equivalent to an impedance 3FG in the zerosequence network. The
connections between the sequence networks are then as shown in
Fig. 24g.
Threephase fault. For symmetrical fault impedances as shown in
Fig. 24h the connections of the sequence networks are as shown in
Fig. 24i.
e
e
<
:
)
r
n
1

3
t


0
4
o Z t
:
1
Z t
=
r
j
t

3
:
a
o 0
0
F
a
(
h
)
3
c
b
b
1
9
F
.
/
2
(
I
)
3
,
1
,
.
b
g
o
.

.
l
.



J
\
A
A


I
Z
e
r
o
F
L
/
2
F
L
/
2
F
a
3
c
1
>
b c
g
o

(
d
)
F
/
2
Z
e
r
o
o


f

!
V
'
0
P
O
S
e
F
/
2
3
F
L
!
:
:
J

l
l
:
:
J
I
(
b
)
(
c
)
(
e
)
(
g
)
(
i
)
O
n
e
l
i
n
e
t
o

g
r
o
u
n
d
f
a
u
l
t
l
i
n
e

t
o

l
i
n
e
f
a
u
l
t
T
w
o

l
i
n
e

t
o

g
r
o
u
n
d
f
a
u
l
t
T
h
r
e
e

p
h
a
s
e
f
a
u
l
t
F
I
G
.
2
4
.
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
s
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
t
o
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
f
a
u
l
t
w
i
t
h
f
a
u
l
t
i
m
p
e
d
a
n
c
e
.
2
M
o
(
a
)
a
c

g
:
r
:
:
v
v
'
:
I
UNSYMMETRICAL OPEN CIRCUITS
231
[66)
Impedance of Fault Shunt, Z,.
z, +Z2 +3F [63]
Z2 +F [64]
FL + (Zo +FL/2 +3Fa) (Z2 +FL/2) [65]
2 Zo +Z2 +FL +3Fa
FL
2
Linetoground
Linetoline
Threephase
Twolinetoground
Fault shunts. The impedances of the fault shunts, connected across
the positivesequence network at the point of fault to represent the
effect of faults having impedance, may be found from inspection of the
connections in Fig. 24; they are as follows:
Type of Fault
(with Fault Impedance)
Type of Fault
Unsymmetrical open circuits and series impedances. Unsym
metrical open circuits may be caused by blown fuses or by singlepole
switching.t The connections between the sequence networks for
representing one or two open conductors or an impedance in series with
one conductor are given in Fig. 25. The derivations of these connec
tions are similar to those given for.ahort circuits earlier in this chapter.
Before these connections are made, the line side of each sequence net
work is opened at the point of fault, and the line on each side of the
opening is considered to be a terminal. (These are the two upper
terminals shown on each block in Fig. 25.) The neutral terminal,
used for representing short circuits, is not used for representing open
circuits.
The effect of an unsymmetrical open circuit or series impedance on
positivesequence quantities may be represented by connecting an
impedance Zp in series with the positivesequence network at the point
of fault. The value of .Zp depends upon the impedances Zo of the zero
sequence network and Z2 of the negativesequence network, each
measured or calculated from terminals at the point of fault in series,
instead of in shunt, with the respective network.
Series Impedance z"
Inserted in Positive
Sequence Network
One conductor open
Two conductors open
Three conductors open
Impedance Z in series
with one conductor
ZoZ2
ZO +Z2
Zo +Z2
co
1
(l/zo) + (l/z2) +(3fZ)
[67]
[68]
[69]
[701
fSinglepole switching is discussed in Chapter XI, Vol. II.
232
a
b
c
g
SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
l!.
a a
Z a
b
!!.
b ~
c
.s.
c c
g g g g
Z/3
(
o
Zero
0
o o
Pos.
0
o 0
Neg.
0
.
z ~ o
.
P ~ s .
[5J
Neg.
Neg.
0 0'
'\Nv
() C)
Zero
0
()
0
Pos.
0
o 0
Neg.
0
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Normal One con Two con Three con Impedance Z
condition duetor open ductors open duetors open in one conductor
FIG. 25. Connections between the sequence networks corresponding to various
types of open circuit or series impedance.
Simultaneous faults and other double unbalances. Approximately
20% of the faults on doublecircuit overhead transmission lines on the
same towers involve both circuits. Occasionally two faults occur
simultaneously at points which are separated geographically as well as
electrically, particularly on systems which are grounded through high
impedance. A combination of an unsymmetrical short circuit with an
unsymmetrical open circuit may occur, as when the short circuit is
partially cleared by the opening of a fuse or singlepole circuit breaker.
The conditions described above may be called "double unbalances."
In general, a double unbalance cannot be correctly represented by
connecting the sequence networks at each of the two points of fault as
they would be connected for single unbalances at those points, nor can
the effect of a double unbalance on positivesequence quantities be
correctly represented by connecting into the positivesequence network
fault shunts or series impedances which have the same values that they
would if the two faults had occurred separately.
For methods of solving threephase networks having double un
balances see Refs. 2, 3, 6, and 7.
LINES IN THE ZEROSEQUENCE NETWORK 233
The zerosequence network. The zerosequence network plays an
important role in determining the currents and voltages during ground
faults. This network differs from the positive and negativesequence
networks particularly with respect to the representation of lines and of
transformers.
Representation of lines in the zerosequence network. In any
threephase circuit positive and negativesequence currents are con
fined to the line conductors. Zerosequence currents, however, being in
phase in all three line conductors, must find a return path elsewhere,
usually either through the earth or through both the earth and over
head ground wires or cable sheaths. The spacing between the out
going and return paths is therefore greater for zerosequence than for
positivesequence currents. Accordingly, the zerosequence series
inductive reactance is greater; and the shunt capacitive susceptance is
smaller, than the corresponding positivesequence quantities. The
zerosequence inductive reactance of lines is greater than the positive
sequence reactance approximately by the following factors:
Singlecircuit aerial lines without ground wires or with steel ground
wires. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . 3.5
Singlecircuit aerial lines with copper or aluminum ground wires. . . . . . . 2
Doublecircuit aerial lines without ground wires or with steel ground
wires " . . . . .. . . . . . 5.5
Doublecircuit aerial lines with copper or aluminum ground wires. . . . . . 3
Threephase cables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3 to 5
Singlephase cables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Although these factors are useful for estimating zerosequence react
ance of lines, more accurate values should be calculated if the conductor
sizes and spacings and the earth resistivity are known. Methods of
calculating zerosequence resistance, reactance, and capacitance are
given in Refs. 1, 2, 3, and 21 of Chapter III.
There is a considerable zerosequence mutual impedance between
parallel aerial lines on the same towers or even on the same rightof
way. The methods of calculating mutual impedance are also given in
the references. If t\VO lines having selfimpedances Za and Zb and
mutual impedance Zm are connected together at both ends, they may
be replaced by a single impedance, Fig. 26a. If they are connected
together at one end only, they can be represented by the equivalent Y
circuit of Fig. 26b. If they are not connected at either end, they can
be represented on an ac. board by the equivalent circuit of Fig. 26c,
which utilizes an insulating transformer of ratio 1: i.t For ordinary
tWo A. Lewis, in discussing Ref. 8, attributes this circuit to C. F. Wagner.
234 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
calculation they can be represented by the mesh circuit of Fig. 26d.
8
If a fault is to be represented on one of a pair of coupled lines, the lines
on each side of the fault must be considered a separate section. Thus,
Ca)
ZeZbZ",,'l
Za+
Z
b 
2Z
""
oJVV\r
6'6
,
CJ a
(c)
c
(bl
a'
a'a
(d)
6'b
b'
Zb
FIG. ?6. Equivalent circuits for two coupled lines of selfimpedances Za and Zb
and mutual impedance Zm. Lines connected together (a) at both ends, (b) at one
end only, and (c) and (d) at neither end.
I
Fault
)(
a
b
m(ZbZm) (lm)(ZbZm)
FIG. 27. Equivalent circuit of two coupled lines, one of which is faulted.
if there is a fault on one of two lines connected' at both ends, and the
fault is distant from one end by a fraction m of the length of the lines,
the equivalent circuit is as in Fig. 27. Equivalent circuits for three or
more coupled lines have been devised" but are seldom needed. Two
coupled circuits having appreciable shunt admittance can be rep
resented by the equivalent or nominal circuits given in Ref. 9.
TRANSF9RMERS IN THE SEQUENCE NETWORKS 235
Representation of transformers in the sequence networks. As a
rule, every important transformer bank on a threephase power system
consists either of three identical singlephase transformers having each
set of windings connected in Y or in d or of a threephase transformer
having its windings connected likewise. Only 'such transformers hav
ing not more than three sets of windings are considered here.
As was mentioned in Chapter III, the positivesequence equivalent
circuit of a twocircuit transformer bank, with exciting current neglected,
consists of a series impedance and an ideal transformer of complex
ratio. The angle of the complex ratio expresses the phase shift of
positivesequence voltage from one side of the transformer bank to the
other. For D.d or YY connections the shift is either 0 or 180. For
!:J,.Y or Y!:J,. connections the phase shift, with the standard manner of
naming the phases, is either +30 or 30, depending upon the exact
connections. By naming the phases in a different manner, the phase
shift of +30
0
may become + 150
0
or 90, and the phase shift of 30
may become +90 or 150. The nomenclature in which the phase
shift is 90 is the most convenient for computation and is recom
mended for that purpose.2, 10 If perunit quantities are used, the
magnitude of the complexratio becomes 1, but the angle remains. In
setting up the positivesequence network, the phase shift is commonly
neglected. The currents and voltages are first calculated as if there
were no phase shift, and later the phase shift is taken into account if it
is of any moment in the use of the results. When phase shift is not
represented, the positivesequence equivalent circuit for perunit
quantities consists merely of a series impedance.
The negativesequence equivalent circuit of a transformer bank is like
the positivesequence circuit except that the angle of the complex
ratio is of opposite sign. For example, if the phase shift for positive
sequence current and voltage is +90, the phase shift for negative
sequence current and voltage is 90. Here again the phase shift is
usually disregarded in setting up the negativesequence network, but
it may be taken into account later if desired.
The zerosequence equivalent circuit differs considerably from the
positive and negativesequence circuits. For banks of singlephase
transformers the value of impedance is the same, but, instead of this
impedance being simply in series with the line, each end of the imped
ance may be either open or grounded, depending upon the connections
of the bank. The proper connection may be deduced by considering
the paths of zerosequence currents. Zerosequencecurrents are equal
in the three phases. It is apparent that such currents cannot flow
through a set of Yconnected windings if the neutral of the Y is isolated,
236 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
but they can flow if the neutral is grounded. Zerosequence currents
cannot flowfrom a threephase line into a set of Aconnected windings,
but they can flow around the delta. If exciting current is neglected,
zerosequence currents can flow in one set of windings of a transformer
bank only if zerosequence currents can flo,v also in the other set of
windings, The foregoing statements may be summarized as follows:
Zerosequence current cannot flow from a line into a transformer bank
Threephase circuit
(a)
Deltadelta
(b)
Ungrounded Y
ungrounded Y
(c)
Grounded Y
grounded Y
(d)
Grounded Y
delta
(e)
Ungrounded
Y delta
(I)
Ungrounded Y
grounded Y
Zero sequence circuit
VV\;
_l
FIG. 28. Zerosequence equivalent circuits of twocircuit transformer banks.
unless the windings connected to the line are in Y with grounded
neutral and unless the other windings are either in ~ or in Y with
grounded neutral, The zerosequence equivalent circuits of various
transformer connections are shown in Fig. 28. Only connections c,
grounded Ygrounded Y, and d, grounded Y  ~ , present a path for
zerosequence current. The other connections are equivalent to an
open circuit in the zerosequence network,
The zerosequence impedance of the grounded y  ~ bank is equal to
the shortcircuit impedance of one transformer. Figure 29 may help
TRANSFORMERS IN THE SEQUENCE NETWORKS 237
to show why this is so. In part a of the figure the actual connections
are shown. It is assumed that equal currents 1
0
are impressed on the
primary windings, causing the secondary current 1
0
' to circulate
around the delta. Because of the symmetry of the delta, terminals
A, B, and C are at the same potential and may be connected to one
another, as indicated by broken lines in the figure, without effectively
changing the circuit for zero sequence. Connecting terminals A, B,
and C is equivalent to shortcircuiting each secondary winding separ
ately as in part b of the figure. It is apparent that the circuit of Fig.
(a)
1 #
0
1
0
~
Vo 1
0
~ I r i
Vo1
~ I o '
0
tvo

(b)
FIG. 29. Diagram showing that the zerosequence impedance of a transformer
bank connected grounded YA is equal to the shortcircuit impedance of the trans
formers.
29b presents between each primary line and ground an impedance equal
to the shortcircuit impedance of one of the transformers. As the line
current is 1
0
and the linetoground voltage is V
o
, the impedance
VolI
o
is the zerosequence impedance. It is equal to the positive
sequence impedance because the latter is also the shortcircuit imped
ance.
Grounding impedance. The neutral of the Yconnected windings
may be grounded either solidly or through a neutral impedance Zn.
The current through Zn is 310, causing a voltage drop across it of
3Z
nIo
, which is added to all three linetoneutral voltages and hence
to the zerosequence component of these voltages. In the zero
sequence network the current is 10, and to obtain the correct zero
238 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
sequence voltage drop the neutral impedance must appear in this net
work as an impedance 3Z
n
in series with the transformer impedance.
Multicircuit transformers. As mentioned in Chapter III, the posi
tivesequence equivalent circuit of a threecircuit transformer, with
exciting current, phase shift, and ratio neglected, consists of three
impedances connected in Y between the terminals of the three circuits.
1 2 3
41;
(a)
FIG. 30. Zerosequence equivalent circuits of threecircuit transformer banks.
As long as phase shift is neglected, the negativesequence circuit is
identical to the positivesequence circuit. The zerosequence circuit
consists of the same set of Yconnected impedances, but the three
terminals of the, Y may not all be connected to the corresponding
external circuits. Each of the three windings should be considered
separately, and the corresponding terminal of the Y should be con
nected according to the same principles already established for two
circuit transformers, namely: (1) if the winding is the
line is left open, and the corresponding impedance is grounded; (2) if
TRANSFORMERS IN THE SEQUENCE NETWORKS 239
the winding is Yconnected with grounded neutral, the line is con
nected to the impedance; and (3) if the winding is Yconnected with
isolated neutral, both the line and the impedance are left open. In
Fig. 30 these principles are applied to several different connections of
threecircuit transformers. The same principles apply to transformers
of four or more circuits.
Threephase transformers. Threephase shelltype and threephase
fivelegged coretype transformers resemble banks of three singlephase
transformers in that they have three magnetic circuits which are al
most independent of each other. Hence the equivalent circuits of
these transformers are the same as those for banks of singlephase units.
In threephase threelegged coretype transformers, however, condi
tions are different. Application of Kirchhoff's lawto the fluxesof three
legs shows that there can be no zerosequence flux in such a transformer
except that leaking through air paths from top to bottom of the core.
Therefore zerosequence exciting currents produce no zerosequence
voltage except that induced by this leakage flux, which is small com
pared with the core flux that would be set up by positivesequence
currents of like magnitude but large compared with the leakage flux
between primary and secondary windings. In other words, the zero
sequence exciting impedance is much smaller than the positive
sequence exciting impedance but is about five times as great as the
leakage impedance, or equivalent impedance, between windings. Con
sequently, even a twocircuit transformer of this type should be rep
resented by a T circuit. The shunt branch, representing the zero
sequence exciting admittance, cannot be neglected, as it usually is in
the positivesequence circuit. The effect of the threelegged core is
similar to that produced by adding a highimpedance ilconnected
winding, as is evidenced in the equivalent circuit by the third branch,
the terminal of which is grounded. The connections at the other
terminals, corresponding to the actual windings, depend upon the
connections of those windings, as already discussed.
Autotransformers. The commonest type of autotransformer on
threephase transmission systems has a set of Yconnected tapped
windings with a grounded neutral and a separate Aconnected stabiliz
ing winding (formerly called a tertiary winding). It is, therefore, a
threecircuit transformer connected Y Y il, and its equivalent circuit
is the same as that of a transformer with three separate windings
similarly connected, the impedances being given on the circuit basis.
2
The zerosequence circuit is connected as shown in Fig. 30a without the
grounding impedances. If the neutral of the autotransformer is
grounded through impedance, this impedance is common to both
240 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
Yconnected circuits and, when expressed in actual ohms, is both the
mutual impedance and a component of each selfimpedance. When
expressed in per unit or in ohms referred to a particular voltage, how
ever, this impedance has three different values, one for the mutual
impedance and two for the two selfimpedances. Therefore, the single
impedance must be represented by a Y circuit, as shown in Fig. 31.
If the neutral of an autotransformer is ungrounded, zerosequencecur
rents can pass from one circuit to the other without transformation,
the transformer acting merely as a series impedance.
(a)
A B
(b)
FIG. 31. An impedance Z common to two circuits, A and B, must be represented
in the perunit system by a Y circuit if different base voltages are used for the two
circuits. N is the ratio of base voltage A to base voltage B, and Z' is the perunit
value of Z on base voltage A. In the zerosequence network all impedances are
multiplied by 3.
Other symmetrical transformer connections, including regulating trans
formers. See Ref. 12.
Effect of grounding on stability. Methods of grounding a power
system modify its zerosequence impedance. This affects the imped
ance of the fault shunts for representing ground faults and thereby
affects the severity of such faults.
Most transmission systems are grounded through transformers, the
highvoltage windings of which are connected in Y with grounded
neutral. Such transformers are nearly always used at the points of
supply and sometimes also at points of load. Occasionallytransform
ers whichdo not carry load are used solelyfor the purpose of grounding.
On highvoltage systems the usual practice is to ground the trans
former neutrals solidly; on mediumvoltage systems, to ground them
either solidly or through resistors or reactors of lowperunit impedance.
Some mediumvoltage systems are nominally ungrounded but actually
are grounded through the relatively high zerosequence shunt capacitive
reactance of the lines. If one or more transformer neutrals are
grounded through reactors, the inductive reactance of which resonates
with the capacitive reactance, the zerosequence impedance may be
made much higher than that of a nominally ungrounded system.
Resonant grounding reactors, known as Petersen coils or groundfault
EFFECT OF GROUNDING ON STABILITY 241
neutralizers, are used to a small but increasing extent. Transmission
systems to which generators are connected directly, rather than through
transformers, are grounded through the generators. The generator
neutrals, like transformer neutrals, may be grounded either solidly or
through resistors or reactors.
The zerosequence impedance of a transmission system, viewed from
the point of fault, depends upon the number of grounding points, upon
the distance of the grounding points from the point of fault, upon the
zerosequence impedance of the grounding transformers (or gener
ators), and upon the impedance of the grounding resistor or reactor,
if used.
An increase in the zerosequence impedance, viewed from the point
of fault, results in a decrease in the severity of a onelinetoground or
twolinetoground fault. The effect of a twolinetoground fault
approaches that of a linetoline fault at the same location, and the
effect of a onelinetoground fault approaches that of no fault. There
fore, in its effect on system stability during ground faults, grounding
through impedance is better than solid grounding. Either resistors
or reactors may be used to decrease the severity of ground faults, but
reactors are cheaper and commoner than resistors.
At some locations, however, resistors are more effective than
reactors. On a system consisting of several synchronous machines
joined by lowresistance lines, the occurrence of a fault decreases' the
electrical outputs of the generators and the electrical inputs of the
actual or equivalent motors, causing the generators to be accelerated
and the motors to be retarded. The closer the fault is to a particular
machine, the greater is its effect on the electrical output or input of that
machine, and the greater is the tendency for the machine to be ac
celerated or retarded, as the case may be. Stability is promoted by
anything which increases the output of the generators during the fault,
thereby lessening their acceleration, provided that the retardation of
the motors is not increased correspondingly. A grounding resistor, by
consuming power during a ground fault, exerts on a synchronous ma
chine a braking effect which is greater the closer the fault is to the
resistor and the closer the machine is to the fault. A grounding re
sistor located near a generator is therefore beneficial, as it exerts the
greatest braking effect on the generator for faults closeby, which would
otherwise result in the greatest decrease of load and, consequently, in
the greatest acceleration. Grounding resistors should not be used,
however, near actual or equivalent synchronous motors or near syn
chronous condensers, for such machines already are retarded by faults.
In a twomachine system resistance grounding may be advisable at the
sending end and reactance grounding at the receiving end.
242 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
Neither grounding resistors nor grounding reactors have any effect
during threephase faults.
The choice of a grounding system is influenced not only by con
sideration of stability but also by other factors, among which are:
(a) limitation of current to prevent damage to generator windings
from excessive mechanical forces; (b) limitation of neutraltoground
and linetoground voltages of transformers to permit the use of graded
insulation and lightning arresters of lower voltage rating, which give
better protection; (c) limitation of inductive influenceon communica
tion circuits during ground faults on the power system; and (d) obtain
ing suitable conditions for rapid and selective relay operation to clear
ground faults. Since the conditions for limiting current conflict with
those for limiting voltage, the choice of grounding method rests on
compromise. The importance of the effect on stability of the method
of grounding has been decreased in recent years by the trend toward
higher speeds of fault clearing.
EXAMPLE 5
Determine the effectiveness of grounding reactors or resistors in increasing
the stability limit of the twomachine system of Fig. 32 during twolineto
ground faults on the transmission lines. Assume the grounding reactance
or resistance to be 10% on the basis of the kilovoltampere rating of. generat
ing station A.
Solution. A fault at either end of one of the transmission lines is more
severe than a fault near the middle of a line; therefore, twolinetoground
faults will be assumed, first at point C, then at point D, Fig. 32. The
stability limit depends upon fault duration. For comparing the different
methods of grounding it will be simplest to find the stability limit for sus
tained faults. This limit will be found by first obtaining the powerangle
equation and then using the equalarea method, or, when the network is
purely reactive, by using Fig. 40 of Chapter V, which was derived by the
equalarea method.
The grounding impedances, Zs at the sending end and ZRat the receiving
end, appear in the zerosequence network as 3Zs and 3ZB, respectively.
The three sequence networks are connected in parallel at points C and 0
(as shown in Fig. 32b) to represent a twolinetoground fault at the sending
end; they are connected similarly, but at D and 0, to represent a fault at the
receiving end. The zerosequence and negativesequence networks are each
reduced to a single impedance between terminals C and 0 (or D and 0), and
then the positivesequence network with fault shunt attached is reduced to a
7r circuit. Next the powerangle equation is found by the methods of Chap
ter IV. The details of calculation will not be shown, but the resulting
equations are given in Table 3. The corresponding stability limits, found
by the equalarea method, are presented in Table 4.
EFFECT OF GROUNDING ON STABILITY 243
30
30
(a)
1.0
10 11 15
Posltive sequence network
Zero sequence network
10
1
I
I
I
3Z R I
' ~ ~   1
32
3Z
s
(b)
o
FIG. 32. Twomachine system of Example 5. (a) Oneline diagram. (b)
Sequence networks interconnected to represent a twolinetoground fault at point
C. Reactances are given in per cent on the rating of the generating station.
TABLE 3
POWERANGLE EQUATIONS OF THE TwoMACHINE SYSTEM OF FIG. 32 FOR
VABIOUS METHODS OF GROUNDING (EXAMPLE 5)
PowerAngle Equations
(power in per cent of rating of station A)
Grounding
Impedance
(per cent)
~ ~
Z8 Zs
o 0
jl0 0
o jtO
jl0 jtO
10 j10
10 10
Any Any
Any Any
SLGFault at SendingEnd
P
u
= 34 sin 8
P
u
= 51 sin 8
P
u
= 36 sin 8
P = 55 sin 8
P
u
= 5 +60 sin (8 +7)
P
u
= 10 + 56 sin (8 + 10)
LL Fault at SendingEnd
Pu, = 77 sin 8
Norrnal Conditions
P = 154sin 8
SLGFault at Receiving End
Pu, = 40 sin 8
Pu, = 42 sin 8
Pu, = 55 sin 8
Pu, = 59 sin 8
Pu, = 4 +58 sin (8 + 2)
Pu, = 5 +55 sin (8 +8)
LL Fault at Receiving End
Pu, = 77 sin 8
One Line Disconnected
Pu, = 129 sin 8
244 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
With solid grounding at both ends, the stability limit for a sustained two..
linetoground fault at the sending end is 27% of the rated kilovoltamperes
of generating station A; and, for a similar fault at the receiving end, it is
32%, as given in the first line of Table 4. The addition of a 10% grounding
reactor at either end increases the stability limit considerably for a fault at
that end but only very slightly for a fault at the distant end. The use of
reactors at both ends increases the stability limit for any fault location; the
increase of stability limit over that obtained with solid grounding at both
TABLE 4
Stability Limit for Sustained Fault
(in per cent of rating of station A)
A
o
o
jtO
jtO
jtO
10
o
jto
o
jl0
10
10
STABILITY LIMITS OF THE TwoMACHINE SYSTEM OF FIG. 32 FOR
SUSTAINED FAULTS, AS AFFECTED BY GROUNDING REACTORS
AND RESISTORS (EXAMPLE 5)
Grounding
Impedance
(per cent)
~
Zs ZR
~
2LG Fault at 2LG Fault at
Sending End Receiving End
27 32
42 34
29 45
46 48
57 52
59 41
LL Fault at LL Fault at
Sending End ReceivingEnd
Any Any 66 66
Stability limit for any fault cleared instantaneously is 123%.
ends is considerable, but the increase over that obtained with a reactor at the
end near the fault is slight. The substitution of a 10% resistor for the
reactor at the sending end provides an additional increase in the stability
limit, although the increase is greater for a fault at the sending end than for a
fault at the receiving end. The further substitution of a resistor for the
reactor at the receiving end results in a small additional increase in stability
limit for a fault at the sending end, but the benefit is more than offset by a
considerable decrease in stability limit for a fault at the receiving end.
The best grounding scheme oj those investigated here is a resistor at the sending
end and a reactor at the receiving end. Even when this scheme is used, the
stability limit is lower for a twolinetoground fault than for a linetoline
fault.
The improvement in stability limit obtained by the use of grounding
impedance is smaller for a rapidly cleared fault than for a sustained fault,
although the stability limit itself is greater.
If grounding resistors are used at one or both ends, the stability limit
depends upon the ratio of the inertia constant of the motor to that of the
TWOPHASE COORDINATES 245
generator. The dependence of stability limit on the inertia constants may
be understood by recalling that the equivalent powerangle curve of a two
machine system having resistance is a sinusoid displaced upward (according
to eq. 28, Chapter IV) by an amount
Po = M2E12Y ll cos811  M1E22Y 22 cos 8 22
M1+M2
where M
l
and M
2
are the inertia constants of the generator and of the motor,
respectively; E
1
and E
2
are the internal voltages of the generator and of the
motor, respectively; and Fu cos On and Y
22
cos 8
22
are the terminal self
conductances of the network between the internal voltages. If the two
conductances are assumed to be equal, as they would be if the fault were
electrically midway between the two internal voltages, and if, furthermore,
the two internal voltages are assumed to be equal, Po would be zero if the
inertia constants were equal. If, however, M
2
were greater than M
I
, Pc
would be positive, indicating a raising of the powerangle curve by the
amount of Po and a resultant raising of the stability limit by about the same
amount. If, on the other hand, M
2
were smaller than M
I
, Pc would be
negative, indicating a lowering of the curve and of the stability limit. In
the present example it has been assumed that the generator and motor have
equal values of stored energy per rated kilovoltampere but that the rating
of the motor is three times that of the generator, giving M2 = 3M
l
If the
twomachine system consisted of a hydroelectric station supplying power to a
metropolitan system of one or more steam stations, M
2
would be consider
ably larger than M
I
, both because of the greater capacity of the steam system
and because of the greater stored energy per kilovoltampere of the steam
turbogenerators; increasing M2/M1from 3 to 00, however, would increase
the stability limit only a small amount. The stability limit is further in
creased if, as is usually true, the internal voltage of the generator is greater
than that of the motor (E
I
> E
2
) . In addition to the upward shift of the
powerangle curve when M
2
> M
I
, there is a small shift to the left, which is
beneficial.
A thorough investigation of the methods of grounding would include a
study of the effects of varying the magnitude of the grounding reactance or
resistance on power limit and also on the linetoneutral voltages. These
matters, however, will not be considered here.
Twophase coordlnates.Pl" Symmetrical components, which have
been used in the preceding part of this chapter for analyzing unbalanced
threephase circuits, are a kind of substituted variables. Another kind
of substituted variables, sometimes used for the same purpose, are
twophase coordinates. Twophase components of current and volt
age are defined as follows:
I, = i (2I
a
 I
b
 Ie) [71a]
In Ref. 14 a, {j, and 0 components are defined in a slightly different way.
246
SOLUTION OF FAULTED NET\VORKS
1
[7tb] III =  (Ie  Ib)
va
I
z
= l(la+ Ib + Ie)
[71c]
V
z
= !(2V
a
 Vb  V
c
) [72a]
1
[72b]
V
1I
= va (Vc  Vb)
v, = leVa + Vb + Vc) [72c]
Note that the expression for I, differs from that for V
z
by a factor 2.
If eqs. 71and 72are solved for the phase quantities in terms of their
twophase components, the following expressions are obtained:
la = Ix +!Iz
[73a]
1 V3 1
[73b]
r, = "2
I
x  2 r, + '2
I
z
1 va 1
[73c]
I, = "2
I
z + 2 III +2"Iz
Va = V
x
+ Vz
[74a]
1 va
[74b] Vb = 2
V
  V + V
x 2 y z
1 va
[74c]
v, = 7jVx + 2 Vy + v,
Relation to symmetrical components. Twophase components are
related to symmetrical components as follows:
r, = 11 + 1
2
I
y
= j(I
I
 1
2
)
[75a]
[75b]
[75c]
v. = VI + V
2
[76a]
V
y
= j(V
1
 V
2
) [76b]
v, = v; [76c]
Note that the x current and voltage are equal to the sum of the posi
tive and negativesequence components, andthe y current and voltage
are equal to the difference of the positive and negativesequence com
TWOPHASE COORDINATES 247
ponents multiplied by j. The z voltage is the zerosequence voltage,
but the z current is twice the zerosequence current.
Consider a balanced, positivesequence set of threephase voltages.
Their negativesequence component is zero. Their twophase com
ponents, byeqs. 76, are V
x
= VI and V
y
= jV
1
, which are balanced
twophase voltages of phase order y, x. Similarly, the twophase
components of negativesequence threephase voltages are twophase
voltages of phase order x, y.
The substitute networks. The x voltages and currents may be im
agined to exist in a singlephase network called the z network; the y
voltages and currents, in another called the y network; and the z volt
ages and currents, in a third called the z network. These networks are
analogous to the sequence networks used in the method of symmetrical
components and may be given the more general name of "substitute
networks." The substitute networks representing a balanced three
phase network whose positive and negativesequence impedances are
equal are independent of one another. The x and y impedances are
equal to each ather and to the positive and negativesequence imped
ances. The z impedances are onehalf the corresponding zerosequence
impedances.
The positive and negativesequence impedances of rotating poly
phase machinery are usually unequal. For many purposes, however,
they may be assumed equal without serious error, thus making the use
of twophase coordinates practicable.
If the threephase network contains balanced, positivesequence
generated electromotive forces, then the x and y networks contain
electromotive forces of equal magnitude, those in the y network leading
those in the x network by 90. Ordinarily, the z network contains no
generated electromotive forces.
The self and mutual impedances of the substitute networks and the
connections between the networks corresponding to any given imped
ances and connections of the threephase network or any portion of it
may be found by the process previously described for symmetrical
components and illustrated by the derivation of equivalent circuits
for representing several types of short circuit.
Connections between the substitute networks for representing short
circuits are shown in Fig. 33.
13
A linetoground short circuit is
represented by connecting the x and z networks in series and leaving the
y network open. A linetoline short circuit is represented by short
circuiting the y network and leaving the x and z networks open. The z
network is dead and need not be set up. However, the x network in
this case and the y network in the case of a linetoground fault, al
248 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
though not connected to anything at the point of fault, contain gener
ated voltages and carry normal load currents.] A twolinetoground
fault is represented by shortcircuiting the y network and paralleling
the x and z networks through a transformer of 2 : 1 ratio. If the
impedances of the z network are given four times their normal value
ao
3<p ~ b
go
o
%
.
[J
0

Z
o
[]
.
[]
[Z]
o 0
__.1
1
% I; ~ p I
(a) (6) (c) (d)
One lineto ground unetoline Two . lineto ground Three phase
FIG. 33. Connections between the substitute networks (z, y, z) for representing
various types of short circuit on a threephase network (34)).
(twice, instead of half, the zerosequence impedances), the trans
former can be omitted.
If the threephase network is symmetrical except at the point of
fault, and if the negativesequence impedances are assumed every
where equal to the positivesequence impedances, the x and y networks
are not coupled to each other and are identical except for a 90
0
phase
difference in generated e.m.f.'s. Therefore it is unnecessary to have
both these networks set up simultaneously on a calculating board.
The positivesequence network is used in turn for both the x and y
networks. For example, in calculating a linetoline fault (Fig. 33b),
readings are taken in the positivesequence network, first with nothing
[Under the assumptions made in using a de. calculating board, all lineto
neutral voltages in this network are equal, and all currents in it are zero.
REFERENCES 249
connected to it at the point of fault, and then again with a short circuit
there. It is not even necessary to shift the generator voltages by 90
because it is a simple calculation to rotate the second set of readings
forward through 90, that is, to multiply them by j. Readings can be
taken for all types of short circuit with only two networks set up on the
board.
Applications oj twophase coordinates. In general, only the positive
sequence network need be set up for a stability study, faults being
represented by fault shunts. Sometimes, however, it is desired to
study the probable operation of protective relays, and for this purpose
the currents and voltages while the system is faulted must be found.
The method of twophase coordinates furnishes a convenient way of
calculating these quantities from readings taken on a calculating board
on which only the z network is set up in addition to the positive
sequence network. .
Twophase coordinates also find application to the analysis of un
balances which are symmetrical with respect to one phase, for example,
singlephase series or shunt impedances, banks of transformers con
nected in V or T, and untransposed transmission lines.
14
, 15,16
REFERENCES
1. C. L. FORTESCUE, "Method of Symmetrical Coordinates Applied to the
Solution of Polyphase Networks," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 37, pp. 1027140, 1918.
Historical reference.
2. C. F. WAGNER and R. D. Evans, Symmetrical Components as Applied to the
Analysis of Unbalanced Electrical Circuits, New York, McGrawHill Book Co.,
1933.
3. W. V. LYON, Applications of the Method of Symmetrical Components, New
York, McGrawHill Book ce., 1937.
4. PHILIP SPORN and C. A. MULLER, "Five Years' Experience with Ultrahigh
Speed Reclosing of HighVoltage Transmission Lines," A.I.E.E. Troms., vol. 60,
pp. 2416, May, 1941.
5. C. L. GILKESON, P. A. JEANNE, and E. F. VAAGE, "Power System Faults to
Ground: Part II: Fault Resistance," Elec. Eng., vol. 56, pp. 42833, 474, April,
1937.
6. EDITH CLARKE, "Simultaneous Faults on ThreePhase Systems," A.I.E.E.
Trans., vol. 50, pp. 91941, September, 1931.
7. E. W. KIMBARK, "Experimental Analysis of Double Unbalances," Elec. Eng.,
vol. 54, pp. 15965, February, 1935.
8. FRANK M. STARR, "Equivalent CircuitsI," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 51, PP.
28798, June, 1932; disc., pp. 3216.
9. J. C. BALSBAUGH, R. B. Gow, W. P. DOUGLASS, and A. H. LEAL, "Equivalent
Circuits2 Coupled Circuits," Elee. Eng., vol. 55, pp. 36671, April, 1936; disc.,
pp, 10379, September, 1936. This paper gives an exactly equivalent fiveterminal
mesh circuit for two coupled lines not connected to each other at either end. The
250 SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
discussion gives (1) an alternative circuit using a transformer, and (2) nominal or
approximate values of the impedances of the equivalent circuits with numerical
comparisons of the nominal values with the exact values.
10. BRYCE BRADY, "Symmetrical Notation of ThreePhase Circuits," A.I.E.E.
Trans., vol. 60, pp. 9557, November, 1941.
11. A. N. GARIN, "ZeroPhaseSequence Characteristics of Transformers,"
Gen. Elec. Reo., vol. 43, pp. 1316, 1749, March and April, 1940.
12. J. E. HOBSON and W. A. LEWIS, "Equivalent Circuits for Power and Regu
lating Transformers," Elec. Jour. preprint, January, 1939; also published as Ap
pendix, Table 7, Electrical Transmission and DistributionReference Book by Central
Station Engineers of the Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company, 1st
edition, 1942.
13. EDITH L. CLARKE, "Determination of Voltages and Currents during Un
balanced Faults: Use of the Sum and Difference of Positive and Negative Sequence
Symmetrical Components," Gen. Elec. Reu., vol. 40, pp. 5113, November, 1937.
14. EDITH CLARKE, "Problems Solved by Modified Symmetrical Components,"
Gen. Elec. Reo., vol. 41, pp, 48894, 5459, November and December, 1938.
15. EDWARD W. KIMBARK, "TwoPhase Coordinates of a ThreePhase Circuit,"
A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 58, pp. 894904, 1939; disc., PP. 90410.
16. EDITH CLARKE, Circuit Analysis of AC Power Systems, vol. I, Symmetrical
and RelatedComponents, New York, John Wiley &Sons, 1943. Chapter V, "Two
Component Networks for ThreePhase Systems"; Chapter X, "Alpha, Beta, and
Zero Components of ThreePhase Systems."
PROBLEMS ON CHAPTER VI
1~ Graphically and algebraically find the symmetrical components of the
following sets of phase voltages:
a
Va = 100/0
v, = 100/240
v, = 100 /120
b
v, = 100LQ
v, = 100/120
v, = 100 /240
C
v, = 100LQ
v, = 100LQ
V
c=100LQ
2. Find the symmetrical components of the following sets of phase cur
rents:
a
I" = 0
I
b
= I
I, = I
b
I
a
= I
I b = !I
Ie = !I
c
I a = I
Ib = 0
I, = 0
3. Find the symmetrical components of the following sets of voltages,
and check the results by computing the given voltages from them:
v, = 100/180, v. = 100/90, v, = 100/0.
4. Find the phase currents corresponding to the following symmetrical
components: 1
0
= 0.15/31, 11 = 0.97/ 1 8 ~ , 12 = 0.45/303.
PROBLEMS 251
5. Work Example 2 with a twolinetoground short circuit on phases
band c of bus D instead of a onelinetoground short circuit.
6. Work Example 2 with a linetoline short circuit on phases band c of
bus D instead of a onelinetoground short circuit.
7. Work Example 2 with the neutrals of both generators A and B, instead
of generator B only, solidly grounded.
8. Compute and diagram the flow of reactive power of each sequence in
the faulted threephase network of Example 2.
9. Find the equations similar to eqs. 39 for a linetoground short circuit
on phase b instead of on phase a. Showthat the impedance of the fault shunt
is the same for a fault on either phase.
10. Find the expression for the impedance of the fault shunt representing a
twolinetoground short circuit, using the second method described in the
text (p. 221).
11. Find an expression for the impedance of a shunt representing a fault
consisting of a linetoground short circuit on phase a and a linetoline short
circuit on phases band c at the same point of a threephase circuit.
12. Find the sequence currents in the system of Fig. 8 when the internal
voltages of generators A and B differ in phase by 60. The magnitude of
each internal voltage is 1.05 per unit. Use the fault current as reference
phase.
13. Find the reactances of shunts for representing each of the four types of
short circuit at the middle of one of the lines of the system of Fig. 15, Chap..
ter V. (The negative and zerosequence reactances are given in Figs. 21
and 22 of Chapter VI.)
14. Calculate and plot stability limit as a function of fault duration for
onelinetoground and twolinetoground short circuits at the middle of one
of the lines of the twomachine system of Fig. 15, Chapter V. Also plot for
comparison the stability limit for a threephase short circuit at the same
point. (See Fig. 22, Chapter V.)
15. Work Example 4 of Chapter V with a twolinetoground fault, instead
of a threephase fault, at the center of one line. Assume that the negative
sequence reactance of the system is equal to the positivesequence reactance
when viewed from the point of fault, and that the zerosequence reactance of
the transmission lines is equal to 3.5 times their positivesequence reactance,
mutual reactance between the two transmission circuits being negligible,
16. Which fault on the system of Example 4, Chapter V, is more severe in
its effect on stability, a threephase short circuit at the middle of one line or a
twolinetoground short circuit at the sending end of one line?
17. Which fault on the system of Fig. 8 is more severe in its effect on
stability, a onelinetoground short circuit on line CDnear bus D or a three
phase short circuit on one of the parallel lines DE' near bus D? Does the
answer depend upon the clearing time?
18. Prove that the connections of Fig. 24gare correct by writing equations
for the relations between phase currents and voltages at the fault and then
252
SOLUTION OF FAULTED NETWORKS
deriving the corresponding equations for the relations between symmetrical
components.
19. If, in Example 4, the linetoground fault had a 20ohm resistance, by
what percentage would the maximum synchronizing power be increased over
that for a solid fault? System base is 50 Mva., 33 kv.
20. Prove that there is no net power in a threephase circuit attributable
to a voltage of one sequence in conjunction with a current of a different
sequence.
21. Find the stability limit of the twomachine system of Example 5 for
sustained onelinetoground faults. Consider the following methods of
grounding: (a) Zs = ZR = 0; (b) Zs = jl0%, ZR = 0; (c) ZB = 0,
ZR = jl0%; (d) Zs = ZR = j10%. .
22. In Probe 21 consider an additional grounding method, as follows:
(e) Zs = 10%, ZR = jl0%.
23. In Example 5 find the linetoground voltages of the sendingend
transformers during a twolinetoground fault at the sending end. Con
sider each of the following grounding methods: (a) Zs = ZR = j10%; (b)
Zs = 10%,ZR = j10%.
24. In Example 5 find the power limits for twolinetoground faults
cleared in 0.25 sec. with the methods of grounding listed in Probe 21. The
frequency is 60 c.p.s.
25. In Example 5 find the power dissipated in the 10% grounding resistor
at the sending end during onelinetoground and twolinetoground faults
at the sending end. A 10% reactor is used at the receiving end. Assume
EI = 1201!1. and E2 = 1001!1.%.
26. Calculate and plot power dissipated in the grounding resistor of the
following simple system during a linetoground fault as a function of the
resistance in per cent. The system consists of a generator for which the
positive and negativesequence reactances are each 20%, a bank of trans
formers of 10% reactance, connected Ll Y with neutral grounded through a
resistor, and a fault at the secondary terminals.
27. Calculate and plot the higher linetoneutral voltage (in per cent) of
the unfaulted phases, during a linetoground fault on the system of Probe
26, as a function of the grounding resistance in per cent.
28. Verify the equivalent circuits of Figs. 26b and c.
29. Derive an equivalent circuit for two coupled lines of different nominal
voltages in which perunit impedances are used.
30. Prove the relations shown in Fig. 31 for representing the ground
impedance of an autotransformer.
31. Find the value of series impedance presented to zerosequence current
by an autotransformer with ungrounded neutral.
32. Solve Example 2 by twophase coordinates. Assume X2 of generators
to equal Xl.
CHAPTER VII
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
In the past twenty years a great number of stability studies have
been made, usually with the aid of an ac. calculating board, on existing
or projected electric power systems. Through the courtesy of a num
ber of operating and engineeringcompanieswe are enabled to present in
this chapter accounts of several such studies made during the last ten
years. Most of the companies have preferred that their names and
the identity of their stations, substations, and lines be withheld; ac
cordingly, letter symbols have been substituted. Let the reader be
assured, however, that neither the stations nor the studies are fictitious.
These typical stability studies have been included in order to illus
trate some of the purposes for which stability studies are made, to
show how such studies are carried out, how the types and locations of
faults to be studied are chosen, howsimplifications of the power system
(such as the combining of several stations) are decided upon, and how
limiting or critical conditions are selected for study, and also to give a
glimpse at the progress made in the improvement of powersystem
reliability.
Some of the stability studies here presented are incidental parts of
more general studies that included also steadystate operation (loading
of lines, maintenance of voltage, required capacity of synchronous
condensers, and so forth). All these studies involved great masses of
data and calculations which it was not feasible to reproduce here in
full; for example, length, spacing, wire size, zero and positivese
quence impedances of transmission lines; nameplate data and
impedances of transformers, generators, and other machines; actual
and estimated future loads on substations at different times of day and
year; moments of inertia of machines; calculations of perunit
impedances on a selected system base; calculatingboard connection
diagrams and instrument readings; and calculations of swing curves.
The reports on some studies fill one or more volumes. The condensed
accounts of the studies which follow give an inadequate idea of the
amount of labor actually spent on the studies. Nevertheless, we hope
that they convey a clear conception of the methods and results.
253
254 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
STUDY 1*
The power systems of company A and company B, when operating
in parallel, experienced difficulties due to transient instability. As an
increased flow of power from company B to company A was con
templated, stable operation would become of greater importance.
Study 1 was made to determine what factors entering into the inter
connected operation of the two systems were important in causing
instability and how stability might be improved.
Description of systems. A map of the two systems, showing
generating stations, substations, and transmission lines (with their
voltages and lengths), appears in Fig. 1. Each station and substation
is there identified by a twoletter combination, the first letter of which
denotes the power company owning or operating it. The combined
systems extended approximately 620 miles from station BO to station
AV.
Company A had two steam stations (AL and part of AP), several
fairly large hydroelectric stations (AB, AC, and AG), and many small
hydroelectric stations, some of which were neglected or were combined
with larger nearby stations in the study. The principal load centers
were near AL and AM. The transmission system of this company was
composedof (1) a backbone of three 132kv.lines in parallel, about 140
miles long, firmly tying together the principal generating stations and
load centers; and (2) an extensive 44kv. network which paralleled
the 132kv. lines, connecting smaller generating stations and loads.und
which extended the system south of the terminus of the 132kv. lines
at station AE to station AP and to numerous substations. Company
A had few instability problems in itself, as the loss of anyone line
(either 132kv. or 44kv.) would not seriously weaken the ties between
generating stations.
Company B had a dozen or so small hydroelectric stations, divided
into an eastern and a western group. Most of the stations of the
western group (BB to BF, inclusive) were connected to each other and
to station AD of company A by a single 132kv. line. Stations BG
and BH, also in the western group, were connected to the other
stations of this group by two 44kv. lines. The stations of the eastern
group (RI to RO, inclusive) were joined to one another and to the
western group chiefly by 66kv. lines, with some 44kv. lines. Thus,
over most of the length of system B there was only one 132...kv. line, or
*Information concerning this study was obtained through the courtesy of
Ebasco Services, Incorporated, New York City, with the concurrence of the operat
ing companies concerned.
STUDY IDESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS 255
two or three lowervoltage lines. This system undoubtedly would
present problems in transient instability even if it were not inter
connected with the system of company A. In addition to what might
34
BM
38
Company B
@] Steam generating station
@ Hydro generating station
~ Combination generating station
@ Synchronous condenser substation
o Substation
Fault location
 132kv. transmission line
+H++ 66kv. transmission line
 44kv. transmission line
Figures onlines aretheirlengths in m i l e s ~
Twoletter combinations are station designations.
AV
71
Principal line
interconnecting
companies A and B
o AA
125
AO
FIG. 1. Map of the power systems of companies A and B, Study 1.
be called an inherently unstable arrangement of the transmission
system of company B, due principally to the nature of the territory
served, several hydroelectric stations on this system had generators
with characteristics which were not well suited to maintaining
stability.
T
A
B
L
E
1
L
I
S
T
O
F
S
Y
N
C
H
R
O
N
O
U
S
M
A
C
H
I
N
E
S
(
S
T
U
D
Y
1
)
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
U
n
i
t
s
R
a
t
i
n
g
W
R
2
(
k
i
l
o

l
b

f
t
.
"
)
K
i
n
e
t
i
c
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
R
u
n
n
i
n
g
i
n
K
i
n
d
,
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
*
L
i
k
e
o
f
X
d
E
n
e
r
g
y
L
o
a
d
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
(
%
)
o
f
U
n
i
t
U
n
i
t
s
M
a
c
h
i
n
e
k
v
.
k
v
a
.
r
.
p
.
m
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
T
u
r
b
i
n
e
(
M
j
.
)
1
2
A
A
l
2
2
2
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
4
2
,
5
0
0
1
8
0
3
0
3
7
5
4
4
3
.
0
A
A
2
1
1
1
I
t
2
.
3
6
2
5
1
5
0
2
5
.
5
2
.
0
A
A
3
2
2
2
I
t
2
.
3
6
0
0
1
5
0
2
4
1
.
0
A
B
l
3
3
1
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
6
1
2
,
2
2
2
5
1
4
1
3
1
,
2
9
5
1
4
7
9
.
5
A
B
2
2
1
0
I
t
6
.
6
8
,
2
0
0
1
5
0
4
0
2
,
1
8
0
1
8
5
1
1
.
3
A
B
3
1
1
1
I
t
7
.
0
8
,
3
3
3
1
7
1
.
5
3
7
1
,
9
4
9
1
7
0
1
4
.
3
A
C
3
3
1
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
6
1
1
,
1
1
1
1
8
0
1
5
3
,
6
6
4
1
4
4
2
8
.
4
A
E
2
2
N
t
C
o
n
d
o
6
.
6
7
,
5
0
0
4
0
0
1
8
7
5
5
.
.
.
2
7
.
8
A
F
l
2
N
N
H
y
d
r
o
4
.
0
1
,
2
5
0
6
0
0
1
5
1
A
F
2
2
N
N
I
t
1
.
1
1
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
6
3
A
G
2
0
1
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
9
1
8
,
7
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
5
,
7
6
0
4
0
2
3
2
.
0
A
H
2
2
2
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
3
2
,
5
0
0
6
0
0
1
3
2
0
9
1
2
.
4
A
I
1
1
1
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
3
1
,
2
5
0
6
0
0
9
1
3
.
0
A
L
l
2
2
0
S
t
e
a
m
4
.
4
8
,
0
0
0
1
,
8
0
0
8
.
5
8
0
3
0
8
1
.
9
A
L
e
1
1
1
I
t
4
.
6
2
5
,
0
0
0
1
,
8
0
0
.
1
9
1
1
4
9
8
1
5
8
A
U
2
1
1
H
y
d
r
o
0
.
5
7
5
0
3
3
0
5
1
3
0
3
3
.
3
A
L
4
1
1
1
"
2
.
3
1
,
0
0
0
6
0
0
1
4
.
5
2
7
9
7
1
0
.
3
A
N
1
N
N
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
3
2
,
5
0
0
3
6
0
1
3
.
5
3
l
'

'
0
1
~
~ ~ ~ .
.
.
.
.
o ;
>
t
"
"
4
0
0
~ ;
>
t
o
~ t
"
"
4
.
.
.
.
.
~ t

<
0
0
~ ~ t
:
1
.
.
.
.
.
t
?
:
j
0
0
T
A
B
L
E
1
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
U
n
i
t
s
R
a
t
i
n
g
W
R
2
(
k
i
l
o

l
b

f
t
.
F
)
K
i
n
e
t
i
c
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
R
u
n
n
i
n
g
i
n
K
i
n
d
,
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
*
L
i
k
e
o
f
X
d
E
n
e
r
g
y
L
o
a
d
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
(
%
)
o
f
U
n
i
t
U
n
i
t
s
M
a
c
h
i
n
e
k
v
,
k
v
a
.
r
.
p
.
m
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
T
u
r
b
i
n
e
1
2
(
M
j
.
)
A
P
l
3
1
1
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
3
2
,
4
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
3
8
3
5
8
.
0
A
P
2
1
1
1
u
2
.
4
7
,
8
6
0
5
1
4
2
4
2
5
4
8
1
5
.
9
A
P
3
1
1
1
S
t
e
a
m
1
3
.
8
1
8
,
7
5
0
1
,
8
0
0
2
2
6
8
9
5
1
2
0
.
8
A
P
4
2
I
1
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
6
8
7
5
6
0
0
1
3
.
5
1
8
3
1
.
7
A
P
5
2
2
2
"
6
.
6
6
0
0
3
0
0
9
6
4
3
1
.
4
A
P
6
1
1
1
"
2
.
3
2
,
4
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
3
8
3
3
8
.
0
A
P
7
2
0
1
"
6
.
6
5
9
0
3
6
0
1
0
3
4
3
1
.
1
A
P
8
2
0
2
"
4
.
0
1
,
2
5
0
5
1
4
1
3
1
1
.
0
A
V
2
N
N
C
o
n
d
o
6
.
6
2
,
5
0
0
1
5
.
5
3
7
.
.
.
3
.
3
B
B
1
1
0
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
3
4
,
3
7
5
1
6
4
1
6
.
3
1
,
1
2
0
t
7
.
6
"
4
4
0
"
6
.
6
7
,
5
0
0
1
2
0
6
5
2
,
6
7
0
t
9
.
7
B
C
5
5
0
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
3
1
,
4
0
0
2
0
0
1
4
3
6
0
t
3
.
6
"
1
1
1
"
2
.
3
3
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
6
3
5
0
t
3
.
2
B
D
1
1
I
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
9
9
,
3
7
5
2
4
0
3
2
1
,
1
6
0
t
1
6
.
9
B
E
1
1
1
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
2
6
0
0
5
1
4
1
5
2
4
t
1
.
6
"
1
1
1
u
6
.
6
1
2
,
0
0
0
2
4
0
2
7
.
5
2
,
0
0
0
t
2
9
.
2
B
F
2
2
2
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
9
9
,
0
0
0
1
3
8
.
5
3
0
4
,
0
0
0
t
1
9
.
4
B
G
2
2
2
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
3
1
,
2
5
0
6
0
0
2
5
2
7
t
2
.
5
"
1
1
1
"
6
.
9
7
,
5
0
0
3
0
0
3
5
4
8
0
t
1
0
.
9
0
0
.
.

3
t
o
<
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
t
;
~ 0
0
(
1
~ .
.
.

4
~ .
.
.

4
o Z o ~ 0
0
.
t
o
<
~ t
r
j
s
=
0
0
.
~ C
J
1
"
'
"
"
T
A
B
L
E
1
(
C
o
o
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
U
n
i
t
s
R
a
t
i
n
g
W
R
2
(
k
i
l
o

I
b

f
t
.
2
)
K
i
n
e
t
i
c
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
R
u
n
n
i
n
g
i
n
K
i
n
d
,
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
*
L
i
k
e
o
f
X
d
E
n
e
r
g
y
L
o
a
d
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
U
n
i
t
s
M
a
c
h
i
n
e
(
%
)
o
f
U
n
i
t
k
v
.
k
v
a
.
r
.
p
.
m
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
T
u
r
b
i
n
e
(
M
j
.
)
1
1
&
B
H
l
2
2
2
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
6
2
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
8
5
7
4
t
5
.
8
"
1
1
1
u
6
.
6
3
,
6
0
0
2
2
5
1
0
5
9
3
t
7
.
6
B
H
2
1
1
1
u
2
.
3
5
,
5
0
0
4
5
0
2
0
5
0
0
+
2
5
.
6
+
B
H
3
1
1
0
"
2
.
3
3
,
1
2
5
4
0
0
5
.
7
B
l
l
1
1
0
C
o
n
d
o
4
.
1
7
,
5
0
0
9
0
0
3
1
.
5
3
9
.
.
.
7
.
3
B
I
2
~
3
0
H
y
d
r
o
0
.
4
3
0
0
2
5
7
1
6
3
1
:
0
.
5
B
I
3
3
3
0
u
2
.
3
6
2
5
1
8
0
2
2
1
4
0
:
1
.
2
B
K
2
2
2
H
y
d
r
o
2
.
2
8
5
0
1
2
0
1
5
2
8
6
t
1
.
0
"
2
2
2
"
2
.
2
1
,
2
5
0
9
0
2
9
5
4
6
t
1
.
1
"
2
2
2
"
2
.
2
1
,
5
6
2
9
0
3
6
5
4
6
t
1
.
1
"
4
4
4
"
2
.
2
1
,
0
0
0
1
0
9
3
6
2
7
0
t
0
.
8
B
L
1
1
0
C
o
n
d
o
2
.
3
3
,
0
0
0
7
2
0
3
4
2
2
.
.
.
2
.
6
B
N
l
2
2
1
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
6
5
,
0
0
0
2
2
5
4
5
1
,
2
0
0
t
1
5
.
4
B
N
1
&
2
1
1
"
0
.
5
5
0
0
2
2
5
1
2
1
2
6
t
1
.
6
"
1
1
1
u
2
.
2
5
0
0
2
2
5
8
.
5
1
0
0
t
1
.
3
B
O
1
1
0
H
y
d
r
o
6
.
6
3
,
6
0
0
2
2
5
1
0
5
9
3
t
7
.
6
*
T
h
e
n
u
m
e
r
a
l
s
a
p
p
e
n
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
d
e
n
o
t
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
r
p
a
r
t
s
o
f
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
h
i
c
h
w
e
r
e
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
S
t
u
d
y
.
t
N
=
N
e
g
l
e
c
t
e
d
.
t
W
R
2
o
f
t
u
r
b
i
n
e
s
o
f
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
B
w
a
s
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
t
o
b
e
1
0
%
o
f
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
W
R
2
~
~ ~ t

d
H a E
:
S
H t
:

t
H ~ ~ ~ ~ t
j
H ~ m
STUDY IDESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS 259
Interconnected operation of the two systems resulted in additional
transient stability problems for both systems. As will appear from
the swing curves obtained in this study, however, faults occurring near
TABLE 2
LIST OF STATIONS HAVING SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES (SroDY 1)
Load Condition 1 Load Condition 2
Kind of
Aggregate Kinetic Aggregate Kinetic
Station
Machines
Mva. Energy Mva. Energy
Running (Mj.) Running (Mj.)
AA Hydro 6.8 10.0 6.8 10.0
AB
It
53.2 264.1 20.5 93.8
AC
u
33.3 85.2 11.1 28.4
AE Condo 15.0 55.6 Off Off
AF Hydro 4.5 Neglected 4.5 Neglected
AG
It
Off Off 18.8 32.0
AH
It
5.0 24.8 5.0 24.8
AI
It
1.2 3.0 1.2 3.0
AL Steam 41.0 321.8 25cO 158.0
It
Hydro 1.8 13.6 1.8 13.6
u
Combined 42.8 335.4 26.8 171.6
AN Hydro 2.5 Neglected 2.5 Neglected
AP Steam 18.8 120.8 18.8 120.8
u
Hydro 14.8 36.4 17.9 39.5
u
Combined 33.6 157.2 36.7 160.3
AV Cond. 5.0 Neglected Off Off
BB Hydro 34.4 46.6 Off Off
Be
It
10.0 21.4 3.0 3.2
BD
u
9.4 16.9 9.4 16.9
BE
II
12.6 30.8 12.6 30.8
BF
Ie
18.0 38.8 18.0 38.8
BG
It
10.0 15.9 10.0 15.9
BH
a
16.1 50.5 13.1 44.8
BI Condo 7.5 7.3 Off Off
It
Hydro 2.8 5.0 OtT Off
It
Combined 10.3 12.3 Off Off
BK Hydro 11.3 9.8 11.3 9.8
BL Cond. 3.0 2.6 Off Off
BN Hydro 11.0 33.7 6.0 18.3
BO
It
3.6 7.6 Off Off
station BG or east of it had little relation to the stability of intercon
nected operation, although such faults sometimes presented serious
stability problems for the eastern part of the system of company B.
The 125mile, 44kv. line from AA to BA had several small hydro
electric stations (grouped as station AA in the study) and several small
0
)
o o > t
"
'
1
r
n
O
J
t
"
'
1
t
o
<
t
:
r
j
0
0
C
"
I
:
+
2 C
7
>
+ s
:
:
;

s
:
C
!
2 +
'
:
i
t
+
'
o .
,
p
A
H
A
J
s
i
l
1
3
2
k
y
.
C
"
I
+
'
C
"
I
+ .
.
,
+
A
K
a
D
:
i
.
.
.
1


+
.
.
.
.
.

A
T
;
e
A
U
; + =
:
A
R
A
S
l
J
F
+
o
G
'
:
;
;
+
B
E
A
I
'
4
C
k
y
.
:
:
1
:
:
J
.
+
'
B
J
=
=
B
L 6
6
k
y
.
6
&
k
y
.
B
L
4
C
k
y
.
B
M
B
K
B
L
.
c
e
o
;

;
:
:
.
t
C
!
:
e
:
+
F
I
G
.
2
.
S
t
u
d
y
1
.
P
o
s
i
t
i
v
e

s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
a

c
.
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
b
o
a
r
d
.
I
m
p
e
d
a
n
c
e
s
a
r
e
i
n
o
h
m
s
o
n
b
o
a
r
d
o
r
i
n
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
o
n
a
4
8
.
4

M
w
.
b
a
s
e
;
s
h
u
n
t
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
a
n
c
e
s
a
r
e
i
n
m
i
c
r
o
f
a
r
a
d
s
o
n
b
o
a
r
d
.
STUDY ILOADING CONDITIONS
261
loads. Although faults on this line would sever it from the intercon
nected system, they would have little effect on the rest of the system.
Table 1 lists synchronous machines (generators, condensers, and
large motors) on the systems of both companies with their ratings,
transient reactances in per cent based on their own ratings, moments of
inertia (WR
2
) in thousands of poundfeet", and amounts of kinetic
energy in megajoules. Table 2 lists the synchronousmachine stations
(or in some cases groups of neighboring stations) represented in this
study, with their aggregate megavoltampere ratings and amounts of
kinetic energy. Figure 2 is a diagram of the positivesequence network,
simplified to the extent required for setting it up on the calculating
board. The zerosequence diagram is not reproduced here.
The oil circuit breakers and protective relays on these systems were
of slowspeed types at the time this study was made.
Loading conditions. Transient stability was studied for two
different loading conditions: (1) estimated August day loads and (2)
estimated October night loads. (The loading of the various circuits
for the two load conditions is shown in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively.)
The first condition was one of heavy loads, due largely to pumping for
irrigation, and involved a considerable transfer of power from company
B to company A (30 Mw. from station BB to station AD). The
second condition was one of light loads but of even greater transfer of
power (36Mw.) from company B to company A. In load condition 2,
all the station BB generators and five of the six station Be genera
tors were shut down because of shortage of water; hence much of the
power transferred to company A was necessarily transmitted from
sources (chieflyfrom stations BE and BF) more distant than in load
condition 1.
The calculating board used in this study had ten power sources for
representing generators. In order to check connections and settings
of the board and also to help determine which generators could be
grouped together for transient stability studies, readings for load
condition 1 were taken, first with company B generators represented
in considerable detail and then with company A generators represented
in considerable detail, according to the columns of Table 3 headed
Run 1 and Run 2. The readings thus obtained are shown in Fig. 3.
The generators were then grouped as shown in the columns of Table 3
for runs 3, 4, 5, or 6, according to fault location, to permit their rep
resentation by ten power sources on the board. Individual line and
generator loads were somewhat distorted by the grouping; the read
ings are not reproduced here. Readings for load condition 2 were taken
with the generators grouped as shown in Table 3 for run 7, and these
readings are shown in Fig. 4.
262 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
STUDY iLOADING CONDITIONS 263
(tn)
.tn 8S't
J
. ...
; 0 ..(&rU "CLt'r)
CQ .... 0...
...
TABLE 3
GROUPING OF SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES FOR REPRESENTATION BY TEN POWER
SOURCES ON THE CALCULATING BOARD AND VALUE OF KINETIC ENERGY OF EACH
GROUP IN MEGAJOULES (STUDY 1)
Power Source Numbers and Kinetic Energy (Mj.)
Station
Runs
RunS Run 1 Run 2
3 and 4
Run 6 Run 7
BO Static*
BL Static 1 22.5 Off
BI 1 1 66.1 1 66.1
BN 2 2 33.8 1 18.3
BK 3 3 9.8 2 9.8
BHs 4 25.6
4 Off 2 44.8 3 44.8
BH1 5 19.2
2 66.4
BG (66kv.) 5 6 10.9
3 15.9 4 15.9
BG (44 kv.) 6 7 5.0
BE 7 4 30.8 8 30.8 5 30.8
3 69.6
BF 8 5 38.8 Off
6 55.7
BD 9 4 16.9 6 16.9 9 16.9
BC 10 1 5 21.4 7 21.4 7 3.2
BB (6.6 kv.) Load box 2
6 46.6 Off
BB (44 kv.) 3 8 56.6
AA 4 7 10.0 With AP
AG Off Off Off
AB 5
8 154.2
AC 6 10
Q()
AF 7
(Infinite
8 376.2 9 376.2
bus)
AH
Off
AN 8
AI
199.4 9
AL 9
9 391.0
AE Static
10 548.1
AP 10 10 170.2
10 157.1
AV Static Off
*uStatic" means represented by capacitor on calculating board.
264
STUDY ISWING CURVES 265
Fault locations. A principal object of the study was to determine
maximum allowable clearing times for faults at locations where they
would affect the stability of the interconnection. It is apparent that a
fault anywhere on the singlecircuit 132kv. lines from station AD to
station BE would split the system into two parts unless highspeed
reclosing were used. Since highspeed reclosing of highvoltage lines
was still in the experimental stage at the time of this study, however,
it was not considered. Hence faults on the singlecircuit 132kv. lines
were not studied. Faults on anyone circuit of the threecircuit 132
kv. connection between stations AB and AE would not divide the
system, and the critical clearing time of such faults had to be deter
mined. Since the impedance of two or three 132kv. lines in parallel
is very low, the exact location of a fault on these lines would not make
much difference. But afault nearstation AD onone of the three 13Skv.
lines to station AC was believed to have a somewhat greater tendency
to produce loss of synchronism between the machines of company A
and those of company B than a fault anywhere else. Consequently,
this fault location was chosen for study.
Faults on the 44kv. transmission system also required consideration.
The most severe effect on stability would be produced by a fault near
the 44kv. terminals of a large 132to44kv. transformer bank. Two
such locations were selected for study, one near each end of the 132kv.
system. One was near station AE on the 44kv. line to station AS, the
other near station BE on the 44kv. line to station BG. The critical
clearing time of faults elsewhereon the 44kv. lines would be expected
to be longer than for those at the selected locations.
Faults on 44kv. or 66kv. lines at some distance from the 132kv.
system would not be expected to have much effect on the stability of
the interconnection. A fault location nearstation BGonthe #kv. line
to station BH was tried to see whether it would disturb the inter
connection.
The four fault locations chosen for study and described above are
marked on the map, Fig. 1.
Twolinetoground faults were considered in most cases, and three
phase faults in some cases. Nearly always, simultaneous clearing at
both ends of the faulted line was assumed.
Swing curves. Eighteen transientstability runs were made in the
course of the study. The swing curves obtained are reproduced in
Figs. 5 to 22 inclusive, and the conditions and results of each run are
summarized in Table 4.
In numbering the stability runs, the first number, such as 3 of 381,
refers to the load.run made to obtain proper initial conditions for the
~ C
)
C
)
T
A
B
L
E
4
S
U
I
O
l
A
B
Y
O
J
'
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
R
U
N
S
(
S
T
U
D
T
1
)
F
a
u
l
t
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
T
i
m
e
(
s
e
c
.
)
r
.
.
.
.
,
R
u
n
L
o
a
d
F
a
u
l
t
L
i
n
e
N
e
a
r
O
n
N
e
a
r
F
a
r
S
t
a
b
l
e
o
r
R
e
m
a
r
k
s
O
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
"
T
y
p
e
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
L
i
n
e
t
o
E
n
d
E
n
d
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
(
k
v
.
)
t

3
3

8

1
1
2
L
G
4
4
A
E
A
S
0
.
4
S
a
m
e
S
t
a
b
l
e
:
;
3
"
3
t
/
I
I
I
"
u
0
.
4
a
s
a
t
S
t
a
b
l
e
H
3

8

2
a
3

S

3
"
"
1
3
2
A
D
A
C
0
.
3
n
e
a
r
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
> e

3

S

4
I
I
"
"
I
I
"
0
.
2
e
n
d
S
t
a
b
l
e
0
0
3

8

5
I
I
2
L
G
I
C
"
u
0
.
4
e
x
c
e
p
t
S
t
a
b
l
e
~
3

S

6
I
I
"
I
I
"
"
0
.
5
w
h
e
r
e
S
t
a
b
l
e
6
;
H
3

8

7
"
u
I
I
"
"
0
.
6
n
o
t
e
d
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
e

H
3

8

8
a
I
t
I
t
"
"
0
.
7
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
S
e
r
i
e
s
R
a
t
s
t
a
.
B
B
~
3

8

1
0
"
"
"
"
"
0
.
8
S
t
a
b
l
e
L
o
w
:
x
t
i
a
t
s
t
a
,
B
B
t
<
0
0
4

8

1
"
3
t
/
I
I
t
"
"
0
.
3
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
S
h
u
n
t
X
a
t
s
t
a
.
B
B
~
4

8

2
I
I
2
L
G
"
"
"
0
.
7
S
t
a
b
l
e
"
"
"
"
"
d t
j
5

8

1
"
"
4
4
B
E
B
G
0
.
3
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
t

4
t
:
J
=
j
5

8

2
"
I
t
"
"
"
0
.
2
S
t
a
b
l
e
0
0
5

8

3
"
"
"
"
"
0
.
2
0
.
4
S
t
a
b
l
e
6

8

1
a
I
t
u
B
G
B
H
0
.
3
S
t
a
b
l
e
7

8

1
2
a
1
3
2
A
D
A
C
0
.
4
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
7

8

2
c
c
c
c
"
"
"
0
.
3
S
t
a
b
l
e
7

8

3
"
"
4
4
B
E
B
G
0
.
2
S
t
a
b
l
e
L
o
a
d
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
1
:
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
d
a
y
l
o
a
d
s
;
l
o
a
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
2
:
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
n
i
g
h
t
l
o
a
d
s
.
STUDY iSWING CURVES
267
320 r     o y o    r   . , .    r   r  ~  _ _ r _  _ . . . _  ....
280 ..tt
2401tt
40
9 (AE, AL)
0.6 0.2 0.4
ne (,seconds)
FIG. 5. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 383, load condition 1, threephase
fault near substation AD on one 132ky. line to station AC, cleared in 0.3 sec.
Unstable.
268 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
stability run, and 81 refers to the first transientstability run made
with these initial conditions, 82 refers to the second run, and so on.
The usual simplifying assumptions were made (constant voltage
behind transient reactance, constant input, and so forth). A time
interval =0.1 sec. was used in pointbypoint calculations.
240
6(BB)
200 ++++f
40 tI f.f+t
cu
U
.....
1I.3++++++i
0 ...... ....."'"....... ............ .....
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 6. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 384, load condition 1, threephase
fault near substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.2 sec.
Stable.
In determining the allowableclearingtime of faults, the usual method
was first to estimate this time and then to make a run using this esti
mated time. If conditions proved stable, another run was made using
a clearing time 0.1 sec. longer than before. If the second run showed
the systems to be unstable, then the clearing time of the first run gave
STUDY ISWING CURVES 269
the answer desired. If the second condition was still stable, then a
third run was made with 0.1 sec. longer clearing time.
Runs 385,386, and 387 (Table 4) illustrate the method. For a
twophasetoground fault at station AD on one of the lines to station
AC under load condition 1, run 385 showed the systems to be stable
200 __orr__.,....,.....,......
O_......_.Io_""_.a.._..I.._"'......'
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 7. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 385, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.4
sec. Stable.
for 0.4sec. clearing. Run 386 showed the systems to be still stable
for 0.5sec. clearing. However, run 387 showed them to be unstable
for 0.6sec. clearing time. Thus it was shown that 0.5 sec. was the
maximum allowable clearing time for these particular conditions.
In some cases it was possible to determine maximum allowable
clearing time from a single run because the angular swing of particular
machines was wide enough, and the trend of accelerating and de
celerating forces on the calculating sheets was such that the run was
readily seen to be a borderline case, and additional clearing time would
270
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
undoubtedly have caused instability. Sometimes comparison with
runs previously made was helpful in such interpretations.
A detailed discussion of the various swing curves follows.
Stability during load condition 1; faults on 132kv. system of com
pany A. The generators were grouped on the power sources of the
calculating board as shown in Table 3 for run 3. Initial conditions for
200.orrrrr'T""""'
160
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 8. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 386, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.5
sec. Stable.
the stability runs were those of load condition 1 (Fig. 3). Swing
curves 383 and 384 (Figs. 5 and 6) show that the systems were
unstable for O.3sec. clearing but were stable for O.2sec. clearing of a
threephase fault at station AD on one of the 132kv. lines to station
AC. Curves 385, 386, and 387 (Figs. 7,8, and 9) show that, with
a twolinetoground fault at the same location and with the same load
condition, the systems were stable for O.5sec. clearing and unstable
for O.6sec. clearing.
Onall these curves it should be noted that the three main generating
STUDY ISWING CURVES
280 ...
271
80
40
O..... ......_....... '___""_____.;;:::I
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 9. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 387, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC. cleared in 0.6
sec. Unstable.
272
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
320 ................
280 1+0+
240 t+r
80
8(AB,AC,AF
t
AH,AI,AN)
40 I_..._+
0'............._....._ ......._ ....._ ....._ ......_ ...
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 10. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 481, load condition 1, 15,OOokva.
shunt reactors added on station BB lowvoltage bus, threephase fault near sub
station AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.3 sec. Unstable.
STUDY 1PROPOSED CHANGES AT STATION BB 273
stations of company A swung almost exactly together, slowing down
during the fault, thus acting like the equivalent motor of a twomachine
system. Station AA and those stations of company B which were
connected at 132 kv. (BB to BE, inclusive) swung fairly closely to
getheralthough not as closely as the stations of system Aand
speeded up, acting like an equivalent generator. In every case
station BB, the station closest to the fault 'of this group, speeded up
more than the others (although it was closely followed by station AA)
and was the first station of this group to pull out of step. Stations
BG to BO, which were farther from the fault, were less affected, but
tended to stay with the other company B stations.
Study of proposed changes at station BB. As station BB was found
to be the first station of company B to pull out of step during faults on
the 132kv. transmission system of company A, it was believed that
any measures taken to help this station stay in step might materially
improve the stability of the interconnected systems. Three different
changes were studied.
Use of shunt reactors. The design of the generators at station BB
contemplated normal operation at 80% lagging power factor. Actu
ally, however, these machines were usually operated near unity power
factor. Such operation caused the machines to have internal voltage
lower than normal and tended to make them unstable. Studies were
made to show the effect of connecting shunt reactors to the lowtension
busses at station BB in order to put about 15Mvar lagging load on the
machines and thereby increase their internal voltages.
The initial load conditions with the reactors added were obtained
in load run 4 and differed only slightly from the conditions of load run
3. The same generator grouping was used. Threephase and two
linetoground faults were assumed at the same location as before,
namely, near station AD on a 132kv. line to station AC. Curve
481 (Fig. 10) shows that the system was unstable for 0.3sec. clearing
of a threephase fault, whereas curve 3S4 (Fig. 6) shows that the
system was stable for O.2sec. clearing of such a fault without the use
of shunt reactors at station BB. Therefore it is apparent that the
addition of the reactors would not increase the maximum allowable
clearing time for a threephase fault by as much as 0.1 sec. Curve
482 (Fig. 11) shows that a clearing time of 0.7 sec. was permissible
for a twolineto..ground fault, and curve 3S6 (Fig. 8) shows a per
missible clearing time of 0.5 sec. if no reactors are used. Therefore,
a gain of at least 0.2 sec. in allowable clearing time of a twolineto
ground fault would result from the use of the reactors.
Use of series resistors. Amethod of increasing the stability of hydro
274 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
electric generators by automatically cutting resistors in series with
them during faults and thereby maintaining their load and decreasing
their acceleration during faults was proposed by R. C. Bergvall.' As
this method appeared to offer a possibility for stabilizing station BB,
it was studied on the board. A resistance of 7.2 ohms per phase, con
nected in series with each of the four 7,500kva. 6,600volt generators,
200 . . .    , .     r    ~  . . . .   . . , . .   . , _ _  _ r _  _ r _  _ , . _  _
0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0
Time (seconds)
FIG. 11. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 482, load condition 1, 16,OOOkva.
shunt reactors added on station BB lowvoltage bus, twolinetoground fault near
substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.7 sec. Stable.
was found to maintain practically fuIlload on the generators during the
fault. Resistors of this value were assumed to be cut into the circuit
0.1 sec. after occurrence of the fault and shortcircuited again 0.2 sec.
after clearing of the fault. The result is shown in curve 388 (Fig. 12),
in which a twolinetoground fault near station AD on a 132kv. line
to station AC caused instability when cleared in 0.7 sec. This ap
peared to be a borderline case, however, and it seemed safe to conclude
that 0.6sec. clearing of the fault would have made the system stable.
Comparison of this result with curve 386 (Fig. 8) for the same condi
STUDY IPROPOSED CHANGES AT STATION BB 275
1.0 0.8 0.2
.ml
S
bO
.5 t \0 I+i+__+_
1.
5
Q)
Cl)4++__+_+i
.51
I
'tn++I4+11
'en
o
40
200 ...........'I"....,rrrr.
120 1..;;;;::::::'l...
 80 1....&_..1._..1..._..1_....1_.....1_....1_"......' __
o
40
0.4 0.6
Time (seconds)
FIG. 12. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 3S8, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.7
sec.: 7.2ohmresistors inserted in station BB generator leads 0.1 sec. after initiation
of fault and removed 0.2 sec. after clearing of fault. Unstable.
276
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
tions but without the series resistors showed an increase of permissible
clearing time of only 0.1 sec.
Decreased transient reactance. The four large generators at station
BB had the abnormally high transient reactance of 65% by test. Un
200..,.or..,..,....,..,....,.....
i 120

f
"'t:J
CD
bo
c
J
80
g
(ij
c
'
.E 40
 40 ......"""_...r._....._'_....._....I
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Time (seconds)
FIG. 13. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 3810, load condition 1, transient
reactance of station BB generators reduced from 65 to 35%, twolinetoground
fault near substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.8 sec.
Stable.
doubtedly, this high value of reactance decreased the stability of
station BB. In order to determine the effect of a lower value of
transient reactance for these machines, curve 3810 (Fig. 13) was
taken with the reactance assumed as 35%. The results showed that
O.Ssec. clearing of a twolinetoground fault would make the system
stable. This represented an improvement of 0.3 sec. over the 0.5sec.
STUDY IFAULTS BETWEEN STATIONS BE AND BG 277
clearing which was necessary for the same fault conditions but with
the high value of transient reactance.
Faults on the 44kv. system of company A. Threephase and two
linetoground faults were tried near station AE on the 44kv. line to
station AS under load condition 1. Curves 381 and 382 (Figs. 14
200
0.8
9(AE,AL)
0.2
o1:. ...... ........ ......
9
0.4 0.6
Time (seconds)
FIG. 14. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 381, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near substation AE on 44kv. line to substation AS, cleared in 0.4
sec. Stable.
160
40
and 15) showthat the systems remained stable for either type of fault
'cleared in 0.4 sec. The limiting case for a twolinetoground fault
was not obtained, and O.5sec. clearing was judged to be permissible.
A fault on the lowvoltage circuits of any of the large stations tapping
the 132kv. lines of company A would be of approximately the same
severity in regard to stability.
Faults on the 44kv. line between stations BE and BG.' The effect
of a twolinetoground fault near station BE on the 44kv. line to
station BGunder load condition 1 is shown in curves 581,582, and
583 (Figs. 16, 17, and 18). The generators were regrouped as shown
278 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
200rr__  , .   _    r   ~  _  _ _ _ ,
 80 en
Q)
f
~
Cl>
"'C
Cl)
00
c
co
40
Cl>
~
8 (AB, AC, AF,
.s
'0
AH, AI, AN)
>
ro
E
$
.s
0
 40 t+++t+t+"it
 80 tt++
1++.. 3 ++++f
~ I
 120""'_'_......._'_A._...... ....... _ ....._ ...
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 15. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 382, load condition 1, threephase
fault near substation AEon 44kv. line to substation AS, cleared in 0.4 sec. Stable.
STUDY IFAULTS BETWEEN STATIONS BE AND BG 279
0.8 0.6
8 (AA, BB)
7(BC)
0.2
O'_J.._.L_..Io._..a..___......._....Ioo._....._....
o
40
320,.....,.rrlrrr,,
240
80
2801ftf1tttt,
C1J
so
c:
co 160 ..... .......
(ij
E
120 (AB, AC, AF, AH, AI, AN)
I I
10(AE, AL, AP, AV)
200
GJ
e
iP
"C

0.4
Time ( seconds)
FIG. 16. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 581, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near station BE on one 44kv. line to station BG, cleared in 0.3 sec.
Unstable.
280 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
for run 5 in Table 3 to give more detailed representation near the fault
and less detailed representation far away from it.
Curve 581 shows the system to be unstable with O.3sec. clearing.
Station BE, which was closest to the fault, pulled ahead and out of
240 .   _ r   ~ r    r   r     r    . .    . . . .   . .
200 It...
lO(AE,AL,
AP,AV)
40 t+
I+ ...., +++++0+1
~ I
o...... ..... .  .   ~  "   ~  ......'
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 17. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 582, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near station BE on one 44kv. line to station BG, cleared in 0.2 sec.
Stable.
step with the rest. Stations BD and BF also speeded up, and stations
BG to BO slowed down. It should be noted that the initial flow of
power was from the former to the latter group of stations, which may
be regarded as the equivalent generator and motor, respectively, of a
twomachine system. Stations BB and Be were but little affected}
and the stations of company A were affected hardly at all.
Curve 5S2 shows the system to be stable with O.2sec. clearing at
STUDY IFAULTS BETWEEN STATIONS BE AND BG 281
./1(BI,BK,
, BL,BN,BO)
4(BE)
breakers
opened
12CYCles'*1
40
10(AE, AL, AP, AV)
240 r......,..,........,....
200 1+'1+..+++1
o..........................    ~
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 18. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 583, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near station BE on one 44kv. line to station BG, cleared in 0.2 'sec.
at BE and in 0.4 sec. at BO. Stable.
282 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
both ends of the line. It was also stable, as shown by curve 583,
with sequential clearing in 0.2 sec. at station BE and in 0.4 sec. at
station BG.
Faults on 44kv..line between stations BG and BH. The effect of a
twolinetoground fault near station BG on the 44kv. line to station
240
40 J+t
9(BD)
I
10 (BB, Be,
andcompany A
asinfinite bus)
I
S 120 7 (BG44 kv.)
I
3 (BJC)
I
Ci 4(B82)
c
...
80
;; 160 .....
I
."

Itt...,I+f++f
:;
O''.....
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time(seconds)
FIG. 19. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 681, load condition 1, twolineto
ground fault near station BG on one 44kv. line to station BH, cleared in 0.3 sec.
Stable.
BH was ascertained for load condition 1. The generators were re
grouped, as shown in Table 3 for run 6, to give more detail in the
neighborhood of the fault, including the separation of stations BG and
BH into two parts each. The machines of company A, together with
stations BB and Be, all of which werefound to be only slightly affected
by a fault between BE and BG, were represented in this run as an
STUDY ISTABILITY DURING LOAD CONDITION 2 283
infinite bus. Curve 681 (Fig. 19) shows the system to be stable for
O.3sec. clearing at both ends of the line. The general direction of
power flow was eastward. During the fault stations west of the fault
360 ryr,...yo,nr.
280 I++++I.......
160
120
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 20. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 781, load condition 2, twolineto
ground fault near substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.4
sec. Unstable.
(equivalent generators) speeded up, and stations east of the fault
(equivalent motors) sloweddown.
Stability during load condition 2. In this load condition, as already
mentioned, station BB and most of the generators at station Be were
284 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
shut down, and more power was transmitted from company B to
company A than in the previous load condition. The generators were
grouped in a manner (shown in Table 3 for run 7) which was judged
360 ."........,......,...,.ro_
10{AA, AP)
AI, AL, AN)
en
CD
CD
240
.!l
co
C
tV
Wo
200
tV
C
...
J!!
.E
280
160
120 __++++t
0.6 0.2 0.4
Time (seconds)
FIG. 21. Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 7S2, load condition 2, twolineto
ground fault near substation AD on one 132kv. line to station AC, cleared in 0.3
sec. Stable.
to be suitable for faults at either of two locationsnear AD on the
132kv. line to AC or near BE on the 44kv. line to BG.
Curves 781 and 782 (Figs. 20 and 21) show that, for a twoline
toground fault at the former location, the systems were stable for
STUDY lSTABILITY DURING LOAD CONDITION 2 285
O.3sec. clearing and unstable for O.4sec. clearing. It will be noted
that the permissible clearing time of 0.3 sec. for this load condition was
considerably shorter than the permissible clearing time of a similar
fault under load condition 1, which was found to be 0.5 sec. This
can be attributed to three reasons:
320
120 I+."'t++tr;
80 """_'"
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 22 Swing curves, Study 1, stability run 783, load condition 2, twoline
toground fault near station BE on one 44kv. line to station BG, cleared in 0.2
sec. Stable.
1. The amount of power transferred from company B to company
A was greater under load condition 2 than under load condition 1.
2. With station BB shut down, much of the power which it
formerly supplied had to be transmitted from a greater distance.
The result was a greater angular displacement between the gener
ators of the two systems in the steady state and, therefore, less stable
operation in the transient state.
286 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
3. When station BB was on the line, regardless of the amount of
power supplied by it, it served to support the voltage near the middle
of the interconnecting line and thus to improve both steadystate
and transient stability. In load condition 2, station BB was shut
down, and this effect was nonexistent.
The permissible clearing time of a threephase fault was not de
termined, but, as it was 0.2 sec. under load condition 1, it would be
0.2 sec. or less under load condition 2.
Curve 783 (Fig. 22) for a twolinetoground fault near BE on the
44kv. line to BGshows a stable condition for O.2sec. clearing at both
ends. It was thought probable that sequential clearing, 0.2 sec. at BE
and 0.4 sec. at BG, would be stable under load condition 2, as it was
under load condition 1.
Summary of allowable clearing times. The slowest clearing times
permissible with stable operation, as determined from the swing curves,
are summarized in Table 5.
TABLE 5
SLOWEST PERMISSIBLE CLEARING TIMES OF FAULTS
(STUDY 1)
Load condition 1 (estimated August day loads)
Three phase fault near AD on 132kv. line to AC:
Twolinetoground fault near AD on 132kv. line to AC:
Threephase fault near AE on 44kv. line to AS:
Twolinetoground fault near AE on 44kv. line to AS:
Twolinetoground fault near BE on 44kv. line to BG:
Twolinetoground fault near BG on 44kv. line to BH:
Load condition 2 (estimated October night loads)
Threephase fault near AD on 132kv. line to AC:
Twolinetoground fault near AD on 132kv. line to AC:
Twolinetoground fault near BE on 44kv. line to BG:
*Estimated.
0.2 sec.
0.5 sec.
0.4 sec.
0.5 see."
0.2 sec.
0.3 sec.
0.2 sec.*
0.3 sec.
0.2 sec.
Conclusion and recommendations. The study showed that the
characteristics of the transmission system, especially in regard to the
speed of clearing faults, had a decidedly more important bearing on the
problem of improving stability than did the characteristics of individ
ual machines or stations. It was concluded that no adequate correc
tion of transient instability could be obtained until both relays and oil
STUDY 1CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 287
circuit breakers on most of the 132kv. circuits, on many of the 44kv.
circuits, and at major generating stations were modernized to obtain
highspeed clearing of faults. If relaying .and oil circuit breakers
were modernized, no other changes would be needed in the system to
obtain a practicable solution of the instability problems which were
studied.
Three proposals for increasing the stability of the generators at
station BB by changes at that station were studied, but the usefulness
of the proposed changes was limited by the fact that this plant was
usually shut down, because of water conditions, at night during the
fall and winter seasons when the greatest amount of power was usually
transferred from company B to company A and when instability of
the systems was aggravated by this heavy power flow. Furthermore,
changes at station BB would have very little effect in improving stabil
ity under most fault conditions which occurred on the system of
company B.
Consideration was given to the possibility of making changes affect
ing generators at plants other than BB. In all cases studied, however,
it was found that the machines in a particular area swung closely
together as a group, almost without regard to characteristics of indi
vidual stations. In practically every case the machines nearest the
fault showed the greatest tendency to lose synchronism.
From the foregoing observations, it was concluded that any changes
which might be made at any of the generating stations would be
limited in their effect and relatively costly to attain and, therefore,
would assume a position of minor importance which did not justify
further study.
It was recommended that a definite program of relay and oil circuit
breaker improvement be prepared, taking into consideration the
amount of good to be accomplishedby various changes and the cost of
the changes. It was also advised to concentrate on those changes
which would allow the systems to remain stable after a twolineto
ground fault, as threephase faults are infrequent on properly relayed
highvoltage systems. Modernization of relay systems and of oil
circuit breakers would not only increase stability but would also de
crease damage to equipment and improve service to customers.
It appeared that the most improvement at the least cost could be
obtained at many points on the system by relay changes. Moderniza
tion of some oil circuit breakers might be accomplished at reasonable
cost but would, in general, be more expensive than relay changes to
attain the same improvement in stability. Someother breakers should
be replaced rather than rebuilt.
288
S Chicago
...
an
C'f)
.""
Indiana and S
Cincinnati
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
Toledo
(Toledo Edison Co.)
South
Point 10
lorain
(OhioP.S. Co.)
FIG. 23. Central 132kv. transmission system of American
Akron
(OhioEdison Co.)
Massilon
(Ohio P.s. Co.)
41.8mf.
6.68+j19.0
STUDY 2
Alliance
(OhioP.S. Co.)
Newcomerstown
289
..,....,........5
5'0
West Penn
Power Co.
Turner
(Institute, W. Va.,
nearCharleston)
Cabin
Creek
W. Va.
Windsor
(Power, W.Va., nearWheelinl)
 Steam electric generatintplant
@ Synchronous condenser(s).
 Equivalent of power system.
~ L o a d .
 Future 132kv. line.
 Existing 132kv. line.
Impedances aregiven in per cent
on l00Mw. 132kv. base.
en Parallel impedance of double 
circuitline.
Figures onbusses areshunt
capacitive susceptances of
connected linesin percent
onsame base.
Gas and Electric Company and interconnections (Study 2).
290 TYPICAL STABILITY. STUDIES
STUDY 2t
In 1940 the Ohio Power Company was adding two new generating
units (numbers 4 and 5, rated at 94.5 Mva. each) to its steamelectric
generating station at Philo (on the Muskingum River near Zanesville,
Ohio), thereby increasing the aggregate capacity of the station from
271.4 Mva. to 460.4 Mva. The generators at Philo were paralleled
through 132kv. busses. The 132kv. oil circuit breakers had a rated
interrupting capacity of 2,500 Mva, The addition of the new gener
ators would have increased the interrupting duty of these breakers from
approximately 2,250 Mva. to approximately 3,150 Mva., a value in
excess of their rating, had not steps been taken to limit the short
circuit currents. For this purpose it was decided to install reactors
between two sections of the 132kv. bus, which will be called sections
A and B.
In October, 1940, an ac. calculatingboard study was made by the
American Gas and Electric Service Corporation of the central system
of the American Gas and Electric Company and interconnected sys
tems, including the expanded Philo station with the bus reactors. The
study included shortcircuit studies, load studies, and a few stability
runs.
The system studied is represented in Fig. 23. It extended from
Indiana across Ohio to West Virginia with interconnections to Chicago,
Cincinnati, western Pennsylvania,' Virginia, and Tennessee. Steam
electric generating plants of the represented part of the American Gas
and Electric Company's system were located at Twin Branch (Mish
awaka, Indiana), at Philo, at Cabin Creek, West Virginia, at Logan,
West Virginia, and at Windsor (near Wheeling), West Virginia. The
generating plants of 'the interconnected systems also were predomi
nantly steam stations. All the transmission lines represented in the
study operated at 132 kv. Impedances of the lines and of the equiva
lent generators are given in per cent on a 100Mva. base in Fig. 23;
total shunt capacitive susceptances at each bus, resulting from nomi
nale representation of the transmission lines, are also given in per cent
on the same base. The impedances of the equivalent generators were
obtained by simplifying the circuits of generating or synchronous
condenser stations, using the transient reactances of the machines.
For example, Fig. 24 is a simplified diagram of Philo station with the
machines and lines grouped on the bus sections in the manner assumed
tData on this study were obtained from the American Gas and Electric Service
Corporation, New York City, through the courtesy of Philip Sporn, Vice President
in Charge of Engineering, Harry P. St. Clair, System Planning Engineer, and
Charles A. Imburgia.
STUDY 2 291
Crooksville
Zanesville Howard Torrey North Newcom Rutland
No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 east erstown No. 1
Generators
j35.3 j61.7 j25.6 j57.0 j57.0 j33.7 j35.3 j61.1 j25.6
e Circuit breakers assumed to open to clear thefault
FIG. 24. Philo steamelectric generating station. Simplified oneline diagram of
the connections assumed in Study 2. Impedances are in per cent on 100Mva.
base. Transient reactances are used for the generators.
(a)
(b)
FIG. 25. Philo plant reduced to two equivalent generators, A and B. Impedances
are in per cent on l00Mva. base. (a) Normal condition, (b) after clearing fault
on bus section AI.
292 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
in the stability study. Data on the generators and transformers at
this station are given in Table 6. Values of impedance on a 100Mva.
base, taken from this table, are marked on Fig. 24. By means of series
and parallel combinations the circuit was further simplified as shown
in Fig. 25. Similar simplifications were performed for the other
generating stations and interconnected power systems shown in Fig. 23.
TABLE 6
DATA ON GENERATORS AND TRANSFORMERS
AT PHILO PLANT (STUDY 2)
GENERATORS
Xd' %on Xd" %on
Unit
,........
Hon
Number Mva. r.p.m, Rating 100 Mva, Rating 100Mva, 100Mva.
1 42.1 1800 24.0 57.0 15.0 33.6 2.35
2 42.1 1800 24.0 57.0 15.0 33.6 2.35
31 62.4 1800 22.0 35.3 13.0 20.8 3.81
32 62.4 1800 21.0 33.7 14.0 22.4 3.81
33 62.4 1800 22.0 35.3 13.0 20.8 3.81
4HP 50.7 3600 13.0 25.6 10.0 19.7 1.74
4LP 43.8 1800 27.0 61.7 16.0 36.6 3.22
5 lIP 50.7 3600 13.0 25.6 10.0 19.7 1.74
5LP 43.8 1800 27.0 61.7 16.0 36.6 3.22
TRANSFORMERS
x%on
~
Unit Mva. Rating 100Mva.
Tl 45 8.9 19.8
T2 45 8.2 18.2
T31
63 17.8 28.3
T32 63 17.5 27.8
T33 63 17.9 28.4
T4 120 13.4: 11.2
T5 120 13.4 11.2
The inertia constants of the equivalent generators are listed in
Table 7. Most of these values are based upon detailed information,
but a few, particularly those for future additional generating capacity,
are estimated at the rate of 6 per 100Mva. for old generators and 5 per
100 Mva. for new generators, the new ones being assumed to be
hydrogencooled.
The calculatingboard setup was similar to that of Fig. 23, except
that Fort Wayne and the stations and systems west and south of it
were combined and represented by an equivalent generator at Fort
STUDY 2 293
TABLE 7
VALUES OF INERTIA CONSTANT H OF SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES ON l00MVA.
BASE (STUDY 2)
Machines Case
1 2 3
Chicago, Indana, and Cincinnati'systems Off 61 76*
Twin .Branch generators 1, 2, 3, 172 Mva. 7.8 7.8 7.8
Twin Branch generator 4, 94 Mva, Off Off 5.0
Fort Wayne condenser, 30 Mva, 1.2 1.2 1.2
Total, Fort .Wayne and West 9 70 90
Fostoria condensers, 40 Mva. 0.7 0.7 Negl.
Toledo Edison Co. system, approx, 100 Mva. 6 6 7.7*
Lorain generating station of Ohio P. S. Co., 36 Mva. 2.1 2.1 2.7*
Canton condensers (Torrey, Sunnyside, Northeast) 2.1 2.1 2.1
Akron and Alliance systems, over 500 Mva. 8 20 36.5*
Total, Canton and interconnections 38.6
Windsor generators (Beech Bottom Power Co.), 257 Mva. 15.1 15.1 15.1
West Penn Power Co. system, approx. 1,000 Mva. Off 71.2 71.2
Total, Windsor and East 86.3 86.3
Philo A (gens. 1, 2, 31, 4) before clearing fault, 241 kyat 13.5 13.5 13.5
Philo A (gens. 1, 2, 31, 4) after clearing fault, 199 kva, 11.1 11.1 11.1
Philo B (gens. 32, 33, 5), 219 kva, 12.6 12.6 12.6
Rutland, future installed capacity of Appalachian Electric
Power Co. and interconnected systems, approx. 1,100
Mva. 60
Lancaster, future interconnection to west, approx, 170 Mva. 10
Cabin Creek generators 1 to 8, 232 Mva, t
Logan generators, 102 Mva. t
Plants south of Logan and interconnected systems, 375Mva,
Total, Logan and south
*Estimated future increase.
[Combined with Rutland.
60
10
t
t
Off
Off
15
4.4
22.6
27
294 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
Wayne. Furthermore, doublecircuit transmission lines were rep
resented on the board by single impedance units set at the impedance
of two lines in parallel; when one circuit was supposed to be switched
out, the setting of the impedance unit was doubled.
The shortcircuit studies showed that the reactance between bus
sections A and B at Philo should be 7.5% on a 100Mva. 132kv. base
in order to limit the interrupting duty of any circuit breaker to a value
slightly less than 2,500 Mva. The 7.5% reactance would be obtained
from two sets of reactors in parallel, as shown in Fig. 24, each having
15% reactance.j
Load studies were made to determine the proper normalload rating
of the reactors and to find the arrangement of transmission lines on the
two bus sections that would give the best conditions of transmission.
In these studies estimated 1942 peak loads were used.
In the course of the load studies, three transientstability runs were
made to test the stability of the system (modified by the addition of
new generating units and bus reactors at Philo) with the interconnect
ing lines to other companies (Chicago, Indiana and Cincinnati, and
western Pennsylvania) first open, and then closed.
The three transientstability runs are herein designated cases 1, 2,
and 3. In cases 1 and 2 proposed generating stations or interconnec
tions at Lancaster and Rutland were assumed to be in operation, and
the existing generating stations at Logan and Cabin Creek were com
bined in an equivalent generator at Rutland. The flow of active and
reactive power in both cases was as shown in Fig. 26. The flow from
Philo west toward Fort Wayne was heavy. There were also heavy
flows from Rutland to Philo and from Philo to Canton. In both cases
1 and 2 a threephase fault was assumed to occur on section Al of
the Philo 132kv. bus and to be cleared in 0.15 sec. (9 cycles) by the
action of Icycle bus diffffi.ential relays opening the following 8cycle
circuit breakers (see Fig. 24): Howard line 1, Crooksville line 1,
generator 1, and bustie reactor 1. The assumptions which have been
stated represent a severe condition regarding stability, because of the
heavy power flow over long transmission lines, the severe type of fault,
the fault location at the sending end, and the loss of a long, heavily
loaded circuit in clearing the fault. A threephase fault near Philo on
one of the lines to Howard might be expected to produce very nearly
the same effect as a fault at the location assumed.
In case 1 the interconnections to other companies were open; in case
2 they were closed. The swing curves for cases 1 and 2 are given in
tThe reactors actually installed were rated 125 Mva., 138 kv., 23% reactance
(equivalent to 20% per reactor on 10oMva. 132kv. base).
~ ~ ~
3
0
.
3

j
3
.
0
N
e
w
c
o
m
e
r
s
t
o
w
n
A
k
r
o
n

A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e
t
r
s
a
n
~ .
.
.
.
.
+ C
'
f
~
4
7
.
2
+
j
1
3
.
0

o
f

o :
;

N a
\
N
T
o
l
e
d
o
t
s
,
,
1
0
6
R
u
t
l
a
n
d
a
n
d
S
o
u
t
h
r
h
t
1
6
6
+
j
3
6
.
2
F
I
G
.
2
6
.
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
l
o
a
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
c
a
s
e
s
1
a
n
d
2
,
S
t
u
d
y
2
.
F
l
o
w
o
f
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
r
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
o
w
e
r
i
s
g
i
v
e
n
i
n
M
w
.
+
i
M
v
a
r
.
B
u
s
v
o
l
t
a
g
e
s
a
r
e
g
i
v
e
n
i
n
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
o
f
1
3
2
k
v
.
t
.
.
:
>
~
296 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
Figs. 27and 28, respectively. In case 1 Fort Wayne and Twin Branch
pulled out of step with the rest of the system, but in case 2 these sta
tions, supported by the interconnections to the Chicago and Indiana
0.6
I
,
r,
I
//
I
"\
I
V
VI/
V
I ....
V
__lZ
.......

I
I
condenser
I
Windsor"'\
I I I
I
I
I Lanc,aster

ZAkron  Alliance
I...........
l/
"".
'"
......
,
I
I
I
I
Lorain
I
,
I
I
"
I
/
,
., I
"
'"
I
\1
/
Fostoria condenser
I I "
"i'L 
. I J I I
.1"
Y
Wayne andWest
'"
,
d r
111 <,
r, ;1
"'I'
!llo...
<,
r,
I
120
o
0
en
cv
20
0

c
0
:e
en
8
40
I
io
c
<
60
80
100
40
60
20
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Time (seconds) afteroccurrence of fault
FIG. 27. Swing curves, Study 2, case 1. Future setup. Generating plants at
Lancaster and Rutland. Interconnections open. Threephase fault on Philo
132kv. bus section Al cleared in 0.15 sec. by opening Howard line 1, Crooksville
line 1, generator 1, and bustie reactor 1. Unstable.
systems, stayed in step. The motion of the other machines was very
nearly the same in both cases. Philo A, the machine nearest the fault,
lost all its load while the fault was on and speeded up more than any
other machine. Philo B, separated from Philo A by the bustie
reactor, also speededup, although less than Philo A did because it lost
STUDY 2 297
j
1
I
/v
I T
I
....
Fault
I
//
"
cleared
0.15 sec.
y
. ./
B
"
r\. ___
I I

C><
I'R.utland __V
[.,.7' I
rr
""""""'"
'<
r,
I r,
lancaster, I
I .......
/,Windsor Canton condenser
. """
II
"
,
'"
.1, .......
C><c
............
 """"
 I
: /
 .. .
c:
s,
I v\ <Lorain
\ Y I
K Alliance
II r. I
..
i
 \ 1oledo I
Fostoria i
"
"
'I
I I \.
I' ...'
,....
r\
r
R=
,
'J/
I
t............
I
" FortWayne andWest
.
I I I I I
60
less load. The other generating stations were affected but .little. The
synchronous condensers, whose swing curves are shown by broken lines,
had very low inertia and swung with a shorter period than did the
generating stations. Because of their small inertia they had little
effect on the rest of the system, and they were not represented separ
ately in case 3.
60
c
o
:t:i
40
40
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Time (seconds) after occurrence of fault
FIG. 28. Swing curves, Study 2, case 2. Future setup. Generating plants at
Lancaster and Rutland. Interconnections closed. Threephase fault on Philo
132kv. bus section Al cleared in 0.15 sec. by opening Howard line 1, Crooksville
line 1, generator 1, and bustie reactor 1. . Stable.
Case 3, representing immediatefuture conditions, was set up without
the proposed generating stations at Lancaster and Rutland, but with
the existing stations south of Philo at Logan and Cabin Creek in
operation, and with interconnections to other companies closed.
Loads were as shown in Fig. 29, substantially the same as for cases 1
and 2. A threephase fault was assumed to occur on section A2 of the
132kv. bus at Philo and to be cleared in 0.15 sec. by the opening of
Howard line 2, Crooksville line 2, Rutland line 2, generator 2, and bus
tie reactor 2. Note that the two groups of lines at Rutland are not
bussed. The swing curves (Fig. 30) show that Cabin Creek and
298 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
FortWayne
and West
40jl0
Crooksville
South
Point
lorain
11.4  j3.6
........ 100.5
.............. 106
t139 +j6.0
Logan andSouth
FIG. 29. Initial load conditions of case 3, Study 2. Flow of active and
....
('t)
e",
I
('f)
...
....
Po: 40.0 +jl1.0
~ ~
I
o
~
98.0
Massilon
~
24.0 +j19.6
B
Philo
STUDY 2
Akron, Alliance, and
Canton condensers
s
40.0 +nos
e
28.0  ,56
Newcomerstown
Cabin Creek
1040
G t190  ;14.0
299
North 
east
.........98.0
t$
:s
It'
Windsor
andWest ~ ...... 102
Penn
reactive power in Mw. +j Mvar. Bus voltages are given in per cent of 132 kv.
300
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
I
<.$1
",
01
Cabin
v::
../
gJl
/
fI'
/
/ /
..Logan
"31
/
..........
<,
&
III""""""
"......,..
I
PhiloAJ
71
I I I I "'lIiI
r,
l.a
I
Akron  Alliance, Canton condenser .........
I J
,
I
I J
,
A
Windsor",
I .'!
,
I """.


V

r.. /Lorain ../
....
...
r..
.......
I
...............
Toled0:L
I
!
I

..........
Fort Wayne and West
.
r.
I

r
l
60
Logan, which were sending power to Philo, speeded up and pulled out
of step with Philo. The pullout might be attributed partly to the loss
of a PhiloRutlandSouth PointTurner circuit and partly to the initial
angular displacement between Logan and Cabin Creek, on the one
80
40
60
40
80
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Time (seconds) afteroccurrence of fault
FIG. 30. Swing curves, Study 2, case 3. Immediatefuture setup. No genera
tion at Lancaster or Rutland. Threephase fault on Philo 132kv. bus section A2
cleared in 0.15 sec. by opening Howard line 2, Crooksville line 2, Rutland line 2,
generator 2, and bustie reactor 2. Unstable.
hand, and Philo, on the other hand, being larger than that between
Rutland and Philo in case 2. Philo A and B swung more nearly to
gether than they did in cases 1 and 2, probably because Philo A was
more lightly loaded than before (175' instead of 215 Mw.).
Conclusions. The following conclusions were reached:
1. The proposed bus reactors at Philo were found to have little
effect on system stability, as evidenced by the fact that the generators
STUDY 3 301
in sections A and B of the plant swung approximately together, even
for a fault on one bus section.
2. It was also found that, without the benefit of the added inertia of
the Chicago and Cincinnati interconnections (although these connec
tions are normally closed), the system under the assumed load condi
tions would lose synchronism between Twin Branch and Philo after a
threephase bus fault at Philo cleared in 9 cycles with the loss of one
PhiloHoward circuit. With the interconnections closed the results
indicated that synchronism would probably be maintained under this
fault condition.
To increase the margin of stability under such conditions a program
of modernizing the Philo line breakers was worked out (and has subse
quently been completed), calling for a reduction from 8 to 5 cycles in
the breakeroperating time and from 9 to 6 cycles in overall clearing
time of faults. Also, the system tie lines between Ohio and Indiana
have been strengthened by the construction of a new 132kv. line from
Portsmouth to Muncie, Indiana, providing a direct line from Turner to
the Indiana area.
3. Likewise, with a threephase bus fault at Philo followed by loss of
a PhiloRutlandTurner circuit, the system, under the heavy load
conditions assumed, showed a probable loss in synchronism between
Philo and the south. Here again, the subsequent improvements
which have been mentioned were designed to eliminate this difficulty,
and they have undoubtedly provided the necessary margin of stability
to prevent loss of synchronism under these conditions.
4. The system engineers have also pointed out that the future in
stallation of 3cycle breakers to replace 5cycle breakers at the most
important locations, together with more extensive application of high
speed reclosing, will provide still greater gains in system stability.
STUDY 3
Figure 31 represents a 132kv. 60cycle transmission network con
necting a large steam generating 'station A (on the extreme righthand
side of the diagram) to a large metropolitan receiving system, which
may be consideredan infinite bus and which is represented by system J
on the extreme left. Connected to the same 132kv. network are two
other steam generating stations, E and I, and a number of substations
with loads.
The circuit breakers and relays on the network were too slow to
maintain synchronism between A and J through severe faults. There
fore, it was believed best to operate the system sectionalized by open
breakers marked with crosses in Fig. 31. Under this plan each of the
S
u
b
s
t
a
.
G
C
I
o
:
)
~ t

3
~ "
'
d
t

4
o :
>
t

4
0
0
~ :
>
t
:
d
t

4
t

4
t

4
~ t
o
<
~ c
:
t
1
t

4
t
:
r
j
0
0
S
t
a
.
A
9
.
9
+
J
3
8
.
J
.
O
"

4
5

j
6
M
v
a
S
u
b
s
t
a
.
D
1
8
.
2
+
j
4
J
.
l
O
1
2
.
0
+
j
S
1
.
5
0
5
.
7
+
j
2
4
.
3
n
S
u
b
s
t
a
.
F
1
2
4
k
v
j
3
5
.
H
l


1
4
+
j
1
0
M
v
a
.
~
~
/
2
2
0
.
1
2

j
1
0
1
M
v
a
~
~
1
2
9
k
v
~
1
1
8

j
5
2
M
v
a
.
4
O

j
2
S
M
v
a
.
3
.
3
+
j
1
2
.
S
0
.
.
.
.
2
3
+
j
2
4
M
v
a
S
y
s
t
e
m
J
o
C
i
r
c
u
i
t
b
r
e
a
k
e
r
n
o
r
m
a
l
l
y
c
l
o
s
e
d
.
1
m
C
i
r
c
u
i
t
b
r
e
a
k
e
r
o
p
e
n
f
o
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
6
.
F
a
u
l
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
O
n
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
s
t
u
d
y
.
F
I
G
.
3
1
.
O
n
e

l
i
n
e
d
i
a
g
r
a
m
o
f
t
h
e
p
o
w
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
o
f
S
t
u
d
y
3
,
s
h
o
w
i
n
g
i
m
p
e
d
a
n
c
e
s
i
n
o
h
m
s
a
t
1
3
2
k
v
.
,
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
l
o
a
d
s
i
n
m
e
g
a
v
o
l
t

a
m
p
e
r
e
s
,
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
v
o
l
t
a
g
e
s
i
n
k
i
l
o
v
o
l
t
s
,
a
n
d
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
f
a
u
l
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
STUDY 3 303
three generating units at station A fed toward the metropolitan system
J over a separate circuit. Afault on anyone circuit and its subsequent
clearing disconnected one of the units at A from the rest of the system.
The disadvantage of this mode of operation was that, after clearing a
fault in or near stations A, B, or C, the loads at A, B, C, or D (depend
ing on the fault location) were fed from stations E, I, and J over such
long lines that the voltages at the loads became too low. To take the
most extreme case, the load at station A could not be supplied over
the long line from system J if a fault occurred in generator At.
The study here described was made to determine which breakers
would have to be speeded up and possibly also equipped with high
speed relaying to make station A stay in synchronism with the rest of
the system for faults on the I32kv. network if the network were to be
operated unsectionalized, that is, with the breakers marked by crosses
closed.
The breakeropening times were about 20 cycles, except for some
8cycle breakers at stations A and E; and the relay times were from 1
to 60 cycles, depending on the fault location. It was assumed in the
study that any breakers requiring faster opening would be rebuilt to
open in 8 cycles. The line relaying would be changed where necessary
to highspeed distance relays having Icycle operating time; and, if
necessary for stability, carriercurrent pilot equipment would be added
to give simultaneous tripping of the breakers at both ends of the line for
faults at any point of the line. It was further assumed that highspeed
bus differential protection would be installed where necessary for
stability.
It is common to use twolinetoground faults in stability studies,
inasmuch as threephase faults are very infrequent on highvoltage
steeltower transmission lines. In this study, however, threephase
faults were assumed, because they are not much more severe than two
linetoground faults in their effect on stability and because they are
much simpler to represent. Only the positivesequence network need
be considered for threephase faults, whereas the zero and negative
sequence networks must also be considered for twolinetoground
faults.
Threephase faults were assumed at various locations, the choice of
which will be discussed, and for each location swing curves were calcu
lated to determine whether the system would be stable with the existing
breakers and relays and with faster breakers and relays.
To obtain the swing curves, the network of Fig. 31 (with all breakers
closed) was set up on an ac. calculating board. Each line was rep
resented by a nominal e, although the shunt capacitance at each end of
304 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
the line is not shown in Fig. 31. The three generators of station A were
represented by a single equivalent machine on the assumption that,
being connected to the same busalthough sectionalized by reactors
they would swing nearly alike. The generators of station E were not
represented, except in one case in which the fault location was near this
station. For other fault locations it appeared that these generators
were electricaliy close enough to the metropolitan system J and far
enough from the fault so that they would not have much effect. In
such cases the load of station E was set to represent the true load there
less generation there. At station I two groups of generators on sepa
rate busses were represented. All generators were represented by
transient reactance and voltage behind transient reactance. At
station A the reactances of the three generators were represented by
separate impedance units connected at one end to different bus sections
(separated by reactors) and connected at the other end to one power
source, the voltage of which represented voltage behind transient
reactance of all three generators. Generator A1 had two windings,
the self and mutual reactances of which were represented by a Y
circuit. In accordance with usual practice voltages behind transient
reactance were kept constant during the study. Data on the inertia,
speed, and kinetic energy of each actual and equivalent generator are
given in Table 8. An interval of 0.1 sec. was used in the pointby
point calculations.
The outputs of the various machines, the values of the loads, and the
bus voltages were adjusted to typical values (shown on Fig. 31) as
nearly as possible to values observed on the system with sectionalized
operation at time of maximum system load. Loads were represented
by constant impedances, which were not changed after the fault
was on.
The most severe fault location is ordinarily closeto the sending end of
the system. Therefore it is logical to try first a fault so located. The
worst fault location on the system of Fig. 31 would be on the lowvolt
age bus of station A. A threephase fault here would entirely interrupt
any exchange of power between the generators of this station and the
rest of the system. This bus, however, was of isolatedphase con
struction; therefore the only type of fault which could occur here was
onelinetoground, which is not a severe fault from the standpoint of
stability. The closest point to the bus at which a threephase fault
could occur was on the highvoltage side of one of the transformers
(there was no highvoltage bus at A) or on the far side of a set of
reactors feeding a local load (fault location 2). As a matter of fact, a
more severe fault location than either of these was on the bus of sub
STUDY 3
305
TABLE 8
INERTIA OF GENERATORS (STUDY 3)
Rating
WR2
Speed
Stored
Generator
(Mva.) (lbft.
2
) (r.p.m.)
energy H 11M
(Mj.)
At 100 859,000 1,800 640 6.40
AS 50 475,000 1,800 365 7.29
AS 50 475,000 1,800 365 7.29
A, total 200 1,809,000 1,370 6.85 7.89
Et 12.5 51,000 1,800 38 3.04
E2 12.5 51,000 1,800 38 3.04
ES 35 357,000 1,800 266 7.60
E4
30 29,100 3,600 87 2.90
E, total 90 429 4.76 25.2
Ila 50 390,000 1,800 291 5.81
Ilb 60 391,000 1,800 292 4.86
11, total 110 781,000 583 5.30 18.5
ISa 35 243,000 1,800 181 5.17
ISb 100 750,000 1,800 560 5.60
IS, total 135 993,000 741 5.49 14.6
station B, where a threephase fault would entirely interrupt the flowof
power between generators A and the other generators. It wasim
material, while the fault was on, whether it was on one or another bus
section of substation B or whether it was just outside the substation on
anyone of the seven lines. The worst location as regards conditions
after the fault was cleared, however, was on the upper bus section
(fault location 1), where clearing a fault would require the opening of a
bustie breaker and of three line breakers, whereas a fault in any of the
other locations mentioned would require the opening of fewer lines.
Consequently, the effect of a threephase fault at location 1 on the bus
of substation B was examined first.
A threephase fault at this location was known to put station A out of
step if slow breakers were used. Therefore 8cycle breakers and 1
cycle bus differential relays were assumed, giving a clearing time of 9
cycles. The swing curves are shown in Fig. 32. Clearly the system
was stable, although without much margin. Twelvecycle clearing
would probably be too slow.
72 64 56 48 24
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
16 8
r
V
A
./
r;
1/
"
r,
V
r,
I.
t.
K

'"
I .........
I
rI""""""
I
'rJ
o
o 32 40
Time (cycles)
FIG. 32. Swing curves, Study 3, fault at location 1, cleared completely in 9 cycles.
System stable.
306
100
80
Q)
e
Q)
60
0
jij
E
u
Q)
40
"ii)
Q)
1i".o
e
<
20

A
.

1
:
r,
I
V
"'
VI
I
1/
I
Fault cleared
12

I
I
11

..................
k Fault on
I I
100
80
20
o
o
8 16 24 32
Time (cycles)
40 48
FIG. 33. Swing curves, Study 3, fault at location 2, cleared in 15 cycles. System
stable.
STUDY 3 307
J
24
12
11
...._ ......... ......
o 8 16
Time (cycles)
FIG. 34. Swing curves, Study 3,
fault at location 3, cleared at both
ends in 9 cycles. System stable.
It could be inferred, without taking more swing curves, that the
system would likewisebe stable for a fault on either of the other bus
sections at substation B cleared in 9 cycles, but would be unstable with
the slowbreakers. Therefore all the breakers at B should be speeded
up, and each bus section should be equipped with highspeed protec
tion.
It could be inferred further that the system would be stable for a
fault close to substation B on anyone of the seven lines cleared in 9
cycles at both ends. Whether sequential clearing would give stability
is not yet clear, but this point will be 60 __
considered later.

Attention was next turned to fault
location 2, separated by a reactor 40
from the lowvoltage bus of station
o
A. Fifteencycle clearing time was :a
assumed, corresponding closely to ! 20 ..........
the existing relay and breaker times
of 6 and 8 cycles, respectively. The
swing curves are given in Fig. 33.
Again, the system was stable.
Fault location 3, just outside sta
tion A on one of the lines to sub
station B, was considered next.
Ninecycle clearing was assumed at
both ends. The swing curves, shown in Fig. 34, indicate that the sys
tem was stable by a big margin. Sequential clearing will be con
sidered later.
The next fault was taken at location 4 near station E on one of the
lines to substation C. The machine at E was represented by a power
source on the supposition that this machine would be a significant
factor in the stability of the system. Sequential clearingwas assumed,
9 cycles (1 cycle relay time plus 8 cyclesbreaker time) at E, where the
breaker already was an 8cycleone, and 80 cycles (60 cycles relay time
plus 20 cycles breaker time) at C. The swing curves are given in Fig.
35. The system was stable and would be so even if the line were not
opened at C. There seems not to be much margin, however, in the
clearing time at E. For this fault location the existing breakers were
satisfactory.
When the fault was taken at the other end of the same line (location
5), however, 21cycle clearing at C (1 cycle relay time plus 20 cycles
breaker time), followed by 68cycle clearing at E (60 cycles relay time
plus 8 cycles breaker time) was not fast enough for stability. The
120 r      r     , . . .   ~  _ _ r _ _  _ , _   . , . . . _ _  ~  
96 84 24 12
O'......I.I.l...... ~      .... ........... ~
o
100
 80
&/)
Q)
~
aD
Fault cleared at C Q)
"tJ
co
.g
60
1J
Q)
'ii
Q)
bo
e
40
e
20
J
36 48 60
Time (cycles)
FIG. 35. Swing curves, Study 3, fault at location 4, cleared at station E in 9
cycles and at substation C in 80 cycles. System stable.
72 64 56 48 24 16 8
/
r I
!
/ !
~
I
I
I
j ~
:
I
I
V
I
I
I
V
I
I
I
J
I I
I I
~ ~
V
I Fault cleared Fault cleared
J at station C at station E.
I
21'"'' 68'"''
I
./
~
I
I
I I
~ ~
I
I

I I
~  Fault on
~ ~ ~
;
~ I
I
~
~
~
~
I
I
./
I
..........
_1/
~ l l
; 
.........
...........
I
.......... J
I
I
I
I
J____
I
o
o 32 40
Time (cycles)
FIG. 36. Swing curves, Study 3, fault at location 5, cleared at substation C in
21 cycles and at station E in 68 cycles. System unstable.
308
140
120
100

en
Q)
~
bO
Q)
80
"'0
tV
u
~
"ii
60
Q)
co
~
40
20
STUDY 3 309
swing curves of Fig. 36 show that station A went out of step with the
rest of the system. Therefore the breaker at C must be speeded up.
Ninecycle clearing at both ends would certainly give stable operation,
because 9cycle clearing sufficedin the more severe fault locations 1, 2,
and 3. Sequential clearing (not tried) probably would be satisfactory.
Attention was now turned to the circuit from B to D, and a three
phase fault was taken at location 6 near D. Generator 12 was not
140 ___ ......
cleared in 27'"
r
I
!
;
I
I
;
I
T I I I I I
Fault cleared at B'.. L.
68""
I I
I
I
1/
.1/
.......... _...... I'Fault cleared in 68/V
20 '
120
100

(/)
Q,)
e
bO
Q,)
80
"0
(ij
u
'':;:
t)
Q,)
Q)
60
Q,)
c
<
40
72
:
64 56 48
I
24 16 8
O'...I..... ...... __..._"___'_....__....._........
o 32 40
Time (cycles)
FIG. 37. Swing curves, Study 3, fault at location 6, cleared at substation B in
27 cycles, system stable; or in 68 cycles, system unstable.
represented for this case, because, with a fault at 6 either on or cleared,
12 could exchange no power with station A and hence would have no
effect on the swinging of A with respect to the infinite bus J. For
similar reasons the clearing time at substation Dwas immaterial to the
stability of A. The clearing time at substation B was first assumed as
68 cycles (60cycles existing relay time plus 8 cyclesnew breaker time) ;
generator A pulled out of step as shown by the swing curves in broken
lines in Fig. 37. The clearing time was then reduced to 27 cycles,
resulting in stability without much margin, as shown by the swing
curves in solid lines in Fig. 37. The required clearing time of 27 cycles
or less at B was too short to permit selective operation between the
310 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
breaker at B and the 20cyclebreaker to the left of D for a fault just to
the left of D. Either the breaker to the left of D must be speeded up,
or else carriercurrent relaying must be installed on the line from B
to D. With an 8cycle breaker and Jcycle relay at D, and a margin of
20 cycles (required by good practice), the clearing time at B would be
1 + 8 + 20 + 8 = 37 cycles, which was still too slow. Hence carrier
current relaying was needed, and by its use the clearing time at sub
station B could be reduced to 9 cycles. As already stated, the clearing
time at D was not important; therefore the breaker at D need not be
changed.
Consider next fault location 7 near substation C on the line from B
to C. Before the fault was cleared, conditions were the same as they
E
c
B
A
8 cycle breakers needed.
   Carrier  current relaying needed.
FIG. 38. Location of 8cycle breakers and carriercurrent relaying necessary to
maintain stability with interconnected operation under the conditions of Study 3.
were for the fault at location 5, for which 21cycleclearing was too slow.
Hence the breaker at Cmust be speeded up to 8 cycles, giving a clearing
time at C of 9 cycles. After the breaker at C was opened, conditions
were similar to what they were for the fault at location 6, except that
the shock during the first 9 cycles was greater for location 7 than for 6,
as the reactance between the fault and the bus of substation B was
slightly less for location 7 than for location 6. Therefore the critical
clearing time at B for a fault at 7 must be considerably less than the 27
cycles found for location 6. A clearing time of 68 cycles (existing relay
time of 60 cycles plus new breaker time of 8 cycles) was far too slow,
and even 37 cycles (secondzoneimpedance relay time of 29 cycles plus
breaker time of 8 cycles) was too slow, Carriercurrent relaying was
therefore needed on each of the two lines between Band C.
For similar reasons carriercurrent relaying should be used on each
STUDY 4DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS 311
of the four lines between A and B. Sequential clearing of endzone
faults appeared to be permissible, however, on the two lines between
C and E. Eightcycle bustie breakers and highspeed bus relaying
should be used at stations Cand E, as well as at B.
Faults were not taken any farther from station A than stations D
and E, because it was known that station A would stay in step, even
with the existing breakers and relays.
The conclusions of the study are set forth in Fig. 38, which shows' the
locations where 8cycle breakers were required and the lines to which
carriercurrent relay channels should be added.
STUDY 4
Three power companies (herein called companies A, B, and C),
operating in neighboring states but having no physical connections
with one another, were considering the construction of interconnecting
transmission lines to permit the interchange of power between them in
either direction. Study 4 was made to determine (a) the transmission
capacity or power limit of the proposed interconnecting lines, (b) the
required capacity of line terminal equipment, such as transformers and
shunt reactors or synchronous condensers, and (c) the modifications
necessary within the three systems to permit utilization of the full
power capacity of the interconnecting lines.
Description of systems. The systems involved in the study are
portrayed by the impedance diagrams (Figs. 39 and 40), and they are
also described in the following paragraphs. Stations of these systems
are designated by twoletter combinations, the first letter of which
denotes the company owning the station.
Company A operated a metropolitan power system having a steam
electric generating station of 112Mva. capacity (station AA) which
fed a number of substations through a l3.8kv. transmission network
(shown in upper righthand corner of Fig. 40). Station AA was con
nected through two 66kv. lines to substation AB, from which con
nections were made to companies D and E andby one of the proposed
linesto company B.
Company B had a system consisting of two distinct parts. (See
Fig. 39.) One part, shown on the lefthand side of the diagram, had
two steamelectric plants (station BF, 25 Mva., and station BG, 32.5
Mva.) a few miles apart. These plants served the area in which they
Information concerning this study was obtained through the courtesy of
Ebasco Services, Inc., New York City, with the concurrence of the operating com...
panies concerned.
312
DC
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
 Usbnllines.
  Proposed lines.
0 Synchronous condenser,
0 Ste.m electric I.ner.ti",
rji\. Hydroelectnc I.ner.tin,
v:..; 'tatlOn.
0 lenerator
representln,.power
system.
LOid.
:I: ...
+ Tr.ns'ormer.
lOMv...
FIG. 39. Study 4, part 1. Impedance diagram showing impedances of trans
mission lines and transformers in per cent on 4oMva. base. Values of capacitive
susceptances of lines are in per cent on the same base. Proposed interconnections
are shown in broken lines.
STUDY 4DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS 313
System C
equlVlltnt
8j:t
1210
AIC
1.!9
AG AD
....
~
,.,;
+
;
~
~ AC
C?
~
~
IE
~
AJ
It'
2
N
N
0;
~ ;
0
.;
~
~
~
cd
:;
s
AA
::
13.8
+
all ~
~ CA 1l0kv N
H ( I : U ~ : ~ )
DA 138 ltv.
~
DA 110 kv
7 ~
~
",
N
,.,;
2 .;
aMva.
+'
~
C it
N ~
'i. fIi
3.28
~ III
DB HOb 
cd
DC4.15ltv.
+
N
~
In
ltl
"!
3.28 ::
~
II'
:;
IQ
IQ
DC 110 kv.
I ;
iii
~
N
SA 601tv
20 Mva.
~
.,
+
In
'It
...
C?
~
40 Mva.
DE 110 kv
H
R
D F69
/'Ii
:;
kv.
,...
~
25
G
9.92
DF 110kv
Mvt.
FIG. 46. Study 4, part 2. Impedance diagram with values in per cent on 25Mva.
base. Line capacitance values are in microfarads on calculating board.
314 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
were situated and fed a number of smaller towns through a 60kv.
transmission system. The other part, shown on the righthand side,
had one steamelectric plant (station BD, 50 Mva.) feeding a number of
substations through 66kv. radial transmission lines. These two parts
were joined through a twocircuit 132kv. line about 100 miles long
from substation BC to station BD.
The system of company B was: interconnected at substation BA
to the system of company F and at station BD to the system of
company G.
Company C, having an extensive system with both steam and hydro
electric plants, was interconnected with several other large systems in
adjacent states. It is represented in Figs. 39 and 40 as an equivalent
generator on the bus of substation CA.
Company D operated asystem (shown in Fig. 40) which included
several hydroelectric stations (DA, DE, DF, DG, and DH) of capac
ities ranging from 8 to 40 Mva. and a I IOkv. transmission system
connecting these generating stations to one another, to substations,
and to companies A and E. This system extended several hundred
miles from the city served by company A.
Company E had a 28Mva. steamelectric plant located in a city
about 60 miles distant from company A.
Company F had a large system; with both steam and hydroelectric
plants. Of these only station FA, the plant nearest system C, was
represented individually in the study, the remainder of the system
being represented by a single equivalent generator (shown in lower left
hand corner of Fig. 39).
Company G had steam plants at GB and GD and' a hydroelectric
plant at GC. It was interconnected with company B at station BD
(lower righthand corner of Fig. 39).
Company H operated a metropolitan system, situated about half way
between companies A and B but not connected to them. Its generat
ing capacity was approximately 275 Mva. (See Fig. 40.)
A list of synchronous machines of companies A, B, D, E, and Gwill
be found in Table 9. As the systems of companies C, F, and H were
not represented in detail, their machines are not listed.
Proposed interconnecting lines. Two lines were proposed, the first
connecting company A to company B, the second connecting company
B to company C. Both are shown by dashed lines in Fig. 39. For the
first line two alternative routes were studied, one from substation AB
to station BD, the other from substation AB to substation Be. The
lengths of these routes are about 280 and 244 miles, respectively. The
second line was to have terminals at BD and CA, and a length of about
256 miles.
STUDY 4PROPOSED INTERCONNECTING LINES 315
TABLE 9
LIST OF SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES (STUDY 4)
Number Rating
Total
Kinetic ,
WR2
Station of Like
Kind of Xd
Energy
Units
Machine (%)
(kilolb
(Mj.)
kv. kva. r.p.m. ft.
2
)
AA 1 Steam 13.2 18,750 1,800 28.0 140 104.8
"
1
H
"
25,000
H
24.0 207 154.0
"
1
u
"
25,000
H
"
237 176.4
u
1
"
13.8 31,250
"
21.0 237 176.4
u
1
H u
12,500 3,600 11.0 15.5 46.4
u
Total 112,500 658.0
AJ 1 Steam 13.8 6,250 3,600 14.0 10.2 29.9
BA 1 Condo 4.16 3,500 720 29.0 38.9 4.7
BC 1 Condo 12.47 3,750 720 29.1 38.9 4.7
u
1
H
"
3,750
"
32.0 106.3 12.7
Ie
Total 7,500 17.4
BD 1 Steam 12.0 18,750 1,800 18.0 102 76.4
"
1
"
"
31,250
"
22.0 235 176

Ie
Total 50,000 252.4
BF 1 Steam 12.5 25,000 3,600 11.0 62* 186
BO 1 Steam 4.16 7,500 3,600 15.8 19* 56.8
"
2
Ie
"
12,500 1,800 19.0 85.3* 64

"
Total 32,500 184.8
DA 3 Hydro 13.8 14,000 150 36.0 7,500 38.8
H
Total 42,000 116.4
DC 1 Condo 4.15 8,000 900 34.9 40.5 7.6
DE 2 Hydro 6.9 10,000 180 35.0 4,650 34.8
a
Total

20,000 69.6
DFl 2 Hydro 6.9 10,000 180 35.0 4,650 34.8
DF2 1
"
u
20,000 164 42.0 9,870 60.8
DF Total 40,000 130.4
DG 3 Hydro 6.9 2,750 112.5 39.0 1,250 3.6
" "

Total 8,250 10.8
*Estimated.
316
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
TABLE 9 (Continued)
Number Rating
Total
Kinetic
Kind of
,
WR2
Station of Like
Zd
Energy
Units
Machine (%) (kiloIb
(Mj.)
kv. kva. r.p.m. ft.
2
)
DH 2 Hydro 13.8 14,500 257 32.0 1,950 29.6
II
Total

29,000 59.2
DI 1 Condo 13.8 15,000 900 35.7 93 17.4
EA 2 Steam 4.15 8,575 3,600 12.0 19.6 58.4
II
1
"
"
6,250
II
14.0 12.4 37.2
II
1
"
u
5,000
"
16.0 10.0 29.9
"

Total 28,400 183.9
EA 1 Condo 4.15 7,500 900 35.1 38.0 7.1
FA Steam
II
Total 162.4 121
GB 1 Steam 31,250 1,800 19.0 414
II
1 Freq.chr. 33,000 300 36.0 6,200
II
Total 64,250
GO 4 Hydro 5,000 164 32.0 1,010
II
Total 20,000
GD 1 Steam 15,625 23.0
Both interconnecting lines were to be of 154kv. singlecircuit
construction, with hollow 250,OOOcircularmil copper conductors of
O.766inch diameter, supported by wooden H frames. The equivalent
spacing between phase conductors would be 17 ft. Ground wires
would be installed to protect the line against lightning.
The necessary terminal equipment would include transformers, shunt
reactors or synchronous condensers, circuit breakers, and protective
relays.
The transformers at substation AB would have three windings: high
voltage, 154 kv. Y; low voltage, 66 kv. Y; and tertiary, 13.8 kv. ~ .
Those at the other end of the AtoB line (at either BC or BD, depend
ing upon the route selected) would be 154to132 kv. Y...connected
autotransformers with 12.5kv. dconnected tertiary windings. For
the BtoC line the transformers at station BD would be autotrans
formers similar to those on the AtoB line, and, even if the terminals
STUDY 4SCOPE OF THE STUDY 317
of both lines were to be at station BD, it was assumed that separate
transformers would be used for each line. At substation CA 154to
110kv. autotransformers with tertiary windings would be required.
The tertiary windings of these transformer banks would be used for
connection of shunt reactors or synchronous condensers to supply the
reactive power needed to hold the voltages of the terminal busses at
suitable values. They would also provide a path for zerosequence
current.
To attain reliable transmission of power over the proposed single
circuit interconnections, without the aid of any parallel ties between
the systems, it would be necessary to use highspeed clearing of faults
on these lines and highspeed reclosure of terminal breakers. Obtain
able circuit breakers had an opening time of 5 cycles and a reclosing
time of 20 cycles with threepole operation. The assumption of
Icycle carrier relaying gave an assumed faultclearing time of 6 cycles
and a reclosing time of 21 cycles, measured from the instant of occur
rence of the fault.
Scope of the study. The study included powerflow and transient
stability studies. The powerflow studies served to determine: (1)
approximate steadystate power limits of the interconnections, (2) the
reactive power which had to be supplied by reactors or synchronous
condensers at the terminals of the proposed lines and elsewhere, (3) the
required capacity of the terminal transformers, (4) the need for addi
tional generating, transformer, or transmissionline capacity within the
several systems, and (5) initial conditions for the transientstability
studies. Transientstability studies served to determine: (1) the
transient power limits of the interconnections for faults on the inter
connecting lines, and (2) the required clearing times of faults on other
lines to prevent impairing the power capacity so determined.
The study was divided into two parts, made at different times and
with different ac. calculating boards. Part 1 dealt with the power
capacity of the AtoB and BtoCinterconnections for power flow in
each direction, also with the choice between BC and BD as southern
terminal of the A..toB line; it dealt also with the effect on stability of
interconnecting systems F and Gto system B, and with various internal
problems of systems Band C arising from the proposed interconnec
tions. For brevity those portions of the study pertaining primarily to
system C and to the BtoCline are omitted from the present report.
Part 2 was concerned with internal problems of system A, including the
required speed of clearing of faults on lines within that system, and
also with the effect on stability of connecting system H to a tap on the
AtoB line.
318 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
Loads. Estimated July and December peak loads three years after
date of study were used. The July loads have practically the same
activepower component as the December loads but have higher
reactivepower components.
Method of determining power limits. Approximate steadystate
momentary power limits of the interconnections were found by in
creasing the electrical angle between bus voltages at major generating
stations of the different power systems to approximately 45. The
practical steadystate power capacity was taken as 5 Mw. below the
value so found, to allow for momentary fluctuations of about 5 Mw.
above the average power carried by the line. Such fluctuations could
be caused by sudden changes in loads or by faults at distant points.
Transientstability power limits were found principally by obtaining
swing curves by the pointbypoint method in order to determine
whether the system would be stable or unstable with various values of
initial power flow if a twowiretoground fault should occur on the
interconnecting line, followed by 6cycle clearing and 21cycle reclosure.
The effects of faults on other lines were investigated in similar fashion,
except that threephase faults were assumed on overhead lines without
ground "vires, on doublecircuit lines, and on cables, and that various
clearing times were assumed. The number of machines represented
in these transientstability runs varied from four to ten.
In two instances the number of machines was reduced to two,
powerangle curves were obtained by use of a calculating board, and
curves of power limit versus switching time were then computed.
The rated power capacity of the interconnecting lines was taken as
5 Mw. lower than the transient power limit, to allow for fluctuations.
Simplification of systems. In representing the systems only major
stations, substations, and transmission tie lines were included. Radial
lines were represented as loads on the busses from which they radiated.
For example, the entire 66kv. system supplied from station BD was
represented as a load on the BD 66kv. bus.
Lines were represented by nominal sr circuits, the capacitances of all
lines on a given bus being represented by one capacitor on that bus.
Proposed interconnecting lines were represented by several sections,
depending upon location of proposed taps to other systems.
Threecircuit transformers were represented by their equivalent Y
circuits. If one branch of such a circuit had negative reactance (as
indicated, for example, in Fig. 39 on the 66kv. side of the transformer
at substation AB), the following change was made in setting up the
circuit on the calculating board: The branch with negative reactance
was set up with zero reactance, and its negative reactance was com
STUDY 4SIMPLIFICATION OF SYSTEMS 319
bined with the greater positive reactance of the opposite branch, thus
preserving the correct value of through reactance from primary to
secondary terminals.
TABLE 10
GROUPING OF SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES FOR REPRESENTATION BY POWER SOURCES
ON THE CALCULATING BOARD (STUDY 4)
Power Source Numbers
Station
Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Runs Run
1 2 3
4
5 6 7 8 to 11
l'


DE, DF, DH 1 1 1 1 1 1
 I 1 1 

DA,DG 2 2 2 2 2 2


EA 3 3 3 3 3 3
 

AJ 4 4
2 2 2 

AA (north bus) 4 4 4 4 5 5


AA (south bus) 6 6



BD 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 7 7


BF 6 6 Off Off
 6  4 4 8 8
BG 7 7 6 4


System C
00* 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00


I
GB 8 7
5
 5

GC,GD 9 8
6



FA Off 10 9 Off 6 Off 7 Off Off
 

Rest of systemF
00 00 00 00
 


System H Off Off Off Off 9
*00 = Infinite bus.
Synchronous condensers were not represented dynamically during
stability studies, but merely by capacitors or reactors.
System C was represented by an equivalent generator on the sub
station CA bus. System F, exclusiveof station FA, which was shown
individually, was represented by an equivalent generator. In stability
studies the equivalent generators at CA and FA were regarded as
infinite. Station DG was combined with station DA. Stations GC
and GD were represented by an equivalent generator on the sub
320 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
station GA bus. In part 1of the study the portion of system D beyond
substation DD was represented as an equivalent generator on the DD
bus, and station AJ was combined with station AA. In part 2 the
portion of system B near stations BF and BG (including transformers,
lines, and loads, but not generators) was represented by an equivalent
circuit (shown in Fig. 40), the terminals of which were: station BF
12.5kv. bus, station BG 4.16kv. bus, substation Be 132kv. bus, and
substation BA 60kv. bus. Since generators were not included in this
network, it was possible to change the generator reactances according
to the number of machines assumed in operation at each station and
according to whether adjusted synchronous reactances were wanted for
steadystate runs or transient reactances for transientstability runs.
In many of the transientstability runs further combinations of
generators were made, as shown in Table 10; for example, stations BG
and BF were combined in some runs.
Swing curves, part 1. Twelve transientstability runs were made
in the part of the study considered. The swing curves are reproduced
in Figs. 41 to 52, inclusive, and the conditions under which they were
taken and the resulting conclusions concerning the stability or in
stability of each case are summarized in Table 11. The grouping of
generators for each stability run is shown in Table 10. Each run will
now be discussed.
Run 1. The company B terminal of the AtoB line was assumed to
be at substation BC. As a step in finding the power limit of this line
for northward power flow, the power sources on the board were ad
justed to give 39.6 Mw. of power received at substation AB from Be.
To supply this power, 13 Mw. was transmitted to system B from sys
tem C, and a new generating unit was assumed installed and operating
at station BF, resulting in a need also of 20 Mva. of additional trans
former capacity at BF. A twolinetoground fault was assumed to
occur on the 154kv. AtoB line near the sending end. The assumed
clearing and reclosing times were 6 and 21 cycles, respectively. The
sending end of any line is ordinarily the worst fault location on the line
from the standpoint of stability; but" since acceleration of the gener
ators during the 6 cyclesin which the fault is on is small compared with
that during the following 15 cycles In which the line is open and the
systems are completely separated, a fault of given type anywhere on
the line would have substantially the same effect on stability as a fault
at the sending end. Inspection of the swing curves (Fig. 41) shows
that the machines of system B swing approximately together and that
they speed up. The speeding up is due to their dropping load during
the disturbance. The machines of systems A, D, and E also swing
T
A
B
L
E
1
1
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
R
U
N
S
(
S
T
U
D
Y
4
)
P
o
w
e
r
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
T
y
p
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
F
a
u
l
t
S
w
i
t
c
h
i
n
g
d
/
lo
"
T
i
m
e
(
c
y
c
l
e
s
)
S
t
a
b
l
e
o
r
R
u
n
A
.
o
f
,
"
R
e
m
a
r
k
s
r

a
L
i
n
e
N
e
a
r
O
n
A
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
M
w
.
R
e
c
'
d
a
t
F
r
o
m
F
a
u
l
t
r
"
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
L
i
n
e
t
o
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
R
e
c
l
o
s
i
n
g
t
r
:
1
3
9
.
6
A
B
B
C
2
L
G
1
5
4
k
v
.
B
C
A
B
6
2
1
S
t
a
b
l
e
~ d
1
3
.
0
B
D
C
A
t
j
2
4
5
.
6
A
B
B
e
"
"
"
u
"
"
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
*
J
o
<
2
1
.
4
B
D
C
A
~
,
3
4
0
.
0
A
B
B
C
3
q
,

3
q
,
1
3
2
k
v
.
B
D
B
e
9
3
0
S
t
a
b
l
e
*
i
n
5
8
.
0
B
C
B
D
b
u
t
~ ~
4
0
.
4
B
D
C
A
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
Z 0
4
3
5
.
4
B
e
A
B
2
L
G
1
5
4
k
v
.
A
B
B
e
6
2
1
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
a
5
"
"
"
"
"
u
"
"
I
I
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
~
6
3
0
.
0
A
B
B
D
I
I
u
B
D
A
B
"
"
S
t
a
b
l
e
:
;
:
0
7
4
0
.
6
A
B
B
D
"
"
"
"
"
"
S
t
a
b
l
e
;
3
1
2
.
4
B
D
C
A
.
.
t
i
l
8
2
6
.
0
B
D
A
B
3
q
,
1
3
.
8
k
v
.
A
A
(
N
)
A
F
1
2
S
t
a
b
l
e
t

d
.
>

9
"
I
I
"
"
"
"
"
1
8
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
~
.
.
1
0
"
"
u
"
"
A
A
(
S
)
t
1
8
S
t
a
b
l
e
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
1
2
5
.
5
"
u
"
"
A
A
(
N
)
A
F
1
8
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
A
A
b
u
s
s
p
l
i
t
.
1
2
4
5
.
0
u
"
2
L
G
1
5
4
k
v
.
A
B
B
D
6
2
1
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
~
*
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
F
a
n
d
G
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
s
y
s
t
e
m
B
w
i
t
h
0
+
}
O
p
o
w
e
r
i
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
.
t
F
a
u
l
t
1
,
0
0
0
f
t
.
f
r
o
m
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
A
o
n
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
e
i
r
.

m
i
l
c
a
b
l
e
.
t
s
y
s
t
e
m
H
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
0
+
j
O
p
o
w
e
r
i
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
.
~ t
o

322 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
1.0 0.8 0.2
 120 ........ ....
o
I
"Of
,....
40
en
t
...
;1.5
Q) L.l.
t
"0

I
Q)
I
e
0
ta
Q)
ta
%!
0
:>
ti
c
40
...
.!
.5
..
c
Q)
Cii
c
l!'
to
80
together, but they slow down because they take on additional load
during the disturbance to make up in their systems for the power which
was received from system B. System C was represented as an infinite
bus and, therefore, did not swing. Station BD, which was closer to
system C than were stations BF and BG, swung less than did stations
BF and BG, as though it were attracted by system C. The curves
clearly show that the system was stable.
80
1 (DE, DF. DH)
0.4 0.6
Time (seconds)
FIG. 41. Swing curves, Study 4, part 1, stability run 1. 39.6 Mw. received at
substation AB from substation Be, and 13.0 Mw. received at station BD from
substation CA. Twolinetoground faultnear substation BCon proposed 154kv.
line to substation AB, cleared in 6 cycles, line reclosed in 21 cycles. Stable.
Run S. The power received at substation AB was increased to 45.6
Mw. To supply this increased power, the power sent to system B from
system Cwas increased to 21.4 Mw., while the outputs of stations BD,
BF, and BG were left unchanged. Systems F and Gwere connected to
system B with zero interchange of active and reactive power. With
the same fault location and with switching times the same as those in
the preceding run, the system proved unstable. Therefore the power
limit oj the AtoB line for northward r'power flow is between J,.O and J,.5
Mw. received. The rated power capacity of the line may be taken as
35 Mw, Study of the swing curves (Fig. 42) shows that the machines
STUDY 4SWING CURVES, PART 1 323
of systems Band G and of station FA swung ahead together. The
rest of system F was represented as one infinite bus, and system C was
represented as another infinite bus. The generators of system B did
not swing as far ahead of system C in this run as they did in the pre
ceding run, in spite of the increase in power transfer. This fact shows
80 .......r,...__r_,.__  _____
40
en
G)
G)
...
r
0 "0
G)
00
e
co
System F as infinitebus
Wo
.19
40
'0
>
n;
e
...
.!
.5
't:
80 G)
'Cij
c
e
~
120
 160'"'..'...L...."'..L_L.._'_..L_I....J._...L.........J
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Time (seconds)
FIG. 42. Swing curves, Study 4, part 1, stability run 2. 45.6 Mw. received at
substation AB from substation BO, and 21.4 Mw. received at station BD from
substation CA. Systems F and G connected to system C with 0 +jO power
interchange. Twolinetoground fault near substation Be on proposed 154kv.
line to substation AB, cleared in 6 cycles, line reclosedin 21 cycles. Unstable.
that the connection of systems F and G to system B has a beneficial
effect on stability. Nevertheless, the generators of systems A, D, and
E, again swinging together, swung farther behind than previously and
pulled out of step with the other generators. Hence the power limit,
either with or without the connection of systems F and Gto system B, is
between 40 and 45 Mw., and it may be concluded that the connection
of those systems has only a small effect.
Run 3. One consequenceof selectingsubstation Be as the company
324
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
B terminal of the AtoB line, while station BD is the terminal of the
BtoC line, is that, when it is desired to transfer power from company
C to company A, this power must flowover the doublecircuit 132kv.
120__......__t".......___....__ __
80
;1. 5
'
I

40
i
f
a

i
0
...
f
System F
....
co
c
40
11
..
c
.I!
en
c
I!
to
80
 120
 160.........."'" """"""_......._ ..........l"""_'"'_....._..._.a.......
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Time (seconds)
FIG. 43. Swing curves, Study 4, part 1, stability run 3. 40.0 Mw. received at
substation AB fromsubstation BC, 58.0 Mw. receivedat substation BCfromstation
BD, and 40.4 Mw. received at station BD from substation CA. Systems F and
G connected to system C with 0 +jOpower interchange. Doublecircuit three
phase fault near station BD on the 132kv. lines to substation Be, cleared in 9
cycles, lines reclosedin 30 cycles. Stable but critical.
line from BD to BC, which at the same time may be required to carry
power from station BD to loads in the lefthand portion of system B.
To test stability under such conditions, run 3 was made. Generation
was adjusted to send 40.0 Mw. (slightly below the power limit found
above) to AB from BC and 40.4 Mw. to BD from CA. At the same
STUDY4SWING CURVES, PART 1
325
time station BD was generating more than was required by the load
in the adjacent part of System B, and the surplus was transmitted to
the distant part, resulting in a total power of 58.0 Mw. received at sub
station BC over the 132kv. lines from BD. No new generators were
assumed to be running. Systems F and Gwere connected to system B
with zero interchange. A threephase fault involving both circuits]
of the 132kv. line to Be was assumed to occur near BD and to be
cleared in 9 cyclesby simultaneous opening of the breakers at both ends
of both circuits, followed by their reclosure in 30 cycles. The swing
curves (Fig. 43) show that the system was stable but critical. The
machines of systems A, D, and E, again swinging together, sloweddown
and almost, but not quite, pulled out of step with the other machines.
Stations BD, GB, GC, and GD (which are on the sending side of the
opened line) swung ahead and then oscillated; of these stations, BD,
which is nearest the fault, swung ahead most rapidly. Stations BF
and BG slowed down at first but speeded up after reclosure of the
faulted lines. The power limit was slightly over 58 Mw. on the BCBD
lines or slightly over 40 Mw, on the ABBC line. The latter figure is
close to the limit already found for a fault on the ABBC line and is
therefore satisfactory. If the fault should involve only one circuit,
the power limit would be higher.
Run 4. It was next decided to investigate the power limit of the
AtoB line when carrying power southward (from A to B). The
power sources were adjusted to give 35.4Mw. received at Be from AB.
To supply this amount of power, the output of station AA generators
was increased to 22 Mw. above the rated capacity of the station,
requiring that a new generating unit be assumed installed and operat
ing there; and, in addition, 30.5 Mw. was received at substation AB
from system D. To absorb this amount of power in system B, station
BF was shut down. The BtoC line was closed with zero active and
reactive power interchange as measured at station BD 132kv. bus.
Systems F and Gwere not connected. Additional transformer capac
ity was required as follows: 13 Mva. at station AA, 5 Mva, at sub
station AB, and 12 Mva. at substation Be. A twolinetoground
fault was assumed to occur near AB on the proposed 154kv. AtoB
line, with the usual switching times. The swing curves (Fig. 44) show
the system to be unstable. Systems A, D, E and system B, although
initially swinging apart, came back together and remained in syn
chronism, but both these groups pulled out of step with system C.
[Such a fault might consist either of a threephase fault on each circuit or of 8,
onelinetoground fault on one circuit and a twolinetoground fault on the re
maining phases of the other circuit.
326 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
System C
as infinite bus
en
\0
.sl
e
';1
u
...., ...+1
80
;; 240
e
r
"'0

CD
J 200 1141
ftS
f
Ci
E 160
C
CD
'iii
c
120
Run 5. Conditions in this run were identical to those in the last ron
except that systems F and G were connected to system B with zero
interchange. The combined system was again unstable (see Fig. 45),
but this time systems Band Cstayed in step with each other, whereas
320 ....rrry..r,
40 '...... .....'
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Time (seconds)
FIG. 44. Swing curves, Study 4, part 1, stability run 4. 35.4 Mw. received at
substation BC from substation AB. Twolinetoground fault near substation AB
on proposed 154kv. line to substation BC, cleared in 6 cycles, line reclosed in 21
cycles. Unstable,
systems A, D, E pulled ahead and out of step with Band C. The
motion of the A, D, E machines was almost exactly the same in both
runs, but the motion of the system B machines was greatly reduced by
the connection of systems F and G. The power limit of the AtoB
line for southward power flow was less than 35 Mw. whether systems
F and G were connected or not, and was estimated as being between
STUDY 4SWING CURVES, PART 1 327
I
i
V
I
I
"2'
/
I
Cl)1
1(systemDl')
V
I
cu_
....
I
V
V
/
ar....
/
V
,,
./
I
I
V
V
ml
I
f "til
I
"31 I
V
14"(AA. AJ, EA)
Y
I
V
V
I
I
/ I
LV
I
V
Y
;
V
I
5
1'
I
rr
I
I
6(FA)
I ""7
System Casinfinitebus yo
"" .

.L .L V

V _
I
,,I
V
System F asInfinite bus
I 4 (BG).
""",
r""'"
I
I ! I
240
280
80

I
"0
200
f
co
8L
160
ca
j
1:
QI
120
e
...
40
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Titne (seconds)
FIG. 45. Swingcurves, Study 4, part 1, stability run 5. Same as run 4 except that
systems F and G were connected to system C with 0 +jO power interchange.
Again unstable.
30 and 35 Mw. The practical power capacity was taken as 25 Mw.
Note that the transientstability limit for southward flow was less than that
for northward flow on the same line.
Run 6. The company B terminal of the AtoB line was now shifted
from BC to BD, and northward power transfer was investigated.
300
First the value of 30 Mw. received at AB from BD was tried. Station
BF was generating 54 Mw. with the new generator operating, and 23
Mva, of additional transformer capacity was required there. No
power was received from system C, and systems F and Gwere discon
nected. Generation at station AA was reduced to such an extent that
to supply its local load necessitated the receipt of power from system
D as well as from system B and required 11 Mva. of additional trans
328 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
1(System D)
2 (AA, AJ, EA)
Q)
"60
e
S
B
g 120
L....
co
E
.!
.5
80
'in
c
cu
.=
40 a'_.L.._.....'......_"""_..._....... __
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Time (seconds}
FIG. 46. Swing curves, Study 4, part 1, stability run 6. 30.0 Mw. received at
substation AB from station BD. Twolinetoground fault near station BD on
proposed 154kv.line to substation AB, cleared in 6 cycles, line reclosedin 21 cycles.
Stable.
reduced. Power flow conditions were much like those of run 1 except
that the generation at AA was smaller, the difference being made up
by power received from system D. Also, systems F and G were con
nected to B. The interconnected systems were stable (Fig. 47), with
considerably more margin than there was in run 1 (Fig. 41). The
improvement might be due in part to the change in company B termi
nal and in part to the connection of systems F and G. The power
limit of the AtoB line with terminalat BD was not exactly deter
mined, but it appeared to be somewhat higher than the corresponding
limit with line terminal at Be, at least for northward power flow.
Swing curves, part 2. In part 2 of the study the required clearing
time of faults on company A's 13.8kv. system and the effect on stabil
former capacity at station AA (slightly less than the amount required
in run 4). A twolinetoground fault was applied to the AtoB line
at the sending end (station BD), cleared in 6 cycles, and reclosed in 21
cycles. The system was stable; all the swings were of small amplitude.
(See Fig. 46.)
Run 7. The power transfer on the AtoB line was increased to 40.6
Mw. received at substation AB from station BD. To provide the in
creased power, 12.4 Mw. was received at BD from system C. To
absorb the increased power, the generation at station AA was further
200 ,...,._,_..yr.,.,..,...r__
STUDY 4SWING CURVES, PART 2 329
ity of an interconnection with company H were investigated. The
network of Fig. 40 was set up on the calculating board. As compared
with the setup of part 1 (Fig. 39), the principal changes were: (a)
The base was changed from 40 Mva. to 25 Mva. (b) The l3.8kv.
network of company A was represented in detail, including the sepa
ration of station AA bus into two sections by a bus reactor, with the
generators of each section represented separately, and the separation
200 rr,.rr........rr_r_............,
 160 II++.a..t++t 6 (Ge, GD)
I
5 (GBl,..,...+t
'0

I
1 t't'..... +tiftf
ml"U
3 t +++.++t..++t
1'
O...... ..........I...&._"....... ......_.....
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Time (seconds)
FIG. 47. Swing curves, Study 4, part 1, stability run 7. 40.6 Mw. received at
substation AB from station BD and 12.4 Mw. received at station BD from sub
station CA. Systems F and G connected to system C with 0 +jOpower inter
change. Twolinetoground fault near station BD on proposed 154kv. line to
substation AR, cleared in 6 cycles, line reclosed in 21 cycles. Stable.
of station AJ from station AA. The 13.8/66kv. transformers at
station AA were assumed to be of 25Mva. capacity each, or 50 Mva,
total, as found necessary in part 1. (c) The remote part of system D
was shown in more detail. (d) The part of system B containing sta
tions BF and BG was represented by an equivalent circuit. The
company B terminal of the AtoB line was placed at station BD.
Systems F and G were not connected. Zero active power and about
17 Mva, reactive power were supplied to system B from system C.
Run 8. First the required clearing time of faults on the 13.8kv.
330
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
1.2 1.0
System Casinfinite bus
0,4 0.2
 20 "' ...._""'_........_"......_ ........_Il.o.
o
140
system of company A was examined. The AtoB interconnection
was delivering 26 Mw. to station BD (approximately the practical
power capacity of the interconnection as found in part 1). The out
put of station AA generators was 101.5 + j40.7 Mva. Since this out
put exceeded the capacity of the station, a new generator was assumed
on the north bus, and the aggregate capacity was divided equally
160 ...r.rr.,.....,rrr,r,.,..,,
en 120
Q)
e
t)I)
Q)
100
Q)
1io
c:
co
80
.B
g
co 60 ..... ......
E
.s
.5
C 40
Q)
'Vi
c
20
0.6 0.8
Time (seconds)
FIG. 48. Swing curves, Study 4, part 2, stability run 8. 26.0 Mw. received at
station BD from substation AB. Threephase fault on 13.8kv. feeder near station
AA north bus, cleared in 12 cycles. Stable.
between the two busses. The voltages of both bus sections were held
at the same magnitude, but a phase difference between them caused
5 Mw. to be transferred from the south to the north bus. From
system D 25 Mw. was delivered to system A. One machine was
assumed to be operating in each system D plant except station DA,
where all machines were assumed to be in service. At station EA 15
Mva. of additional 110/66kv. transformer capacity was required.
A threephase fault was assumed to occur near station AA on a
13.8kv. underground cable feeder supplied from the north bus. With
12cycle clearing the system was stable. (See swing curves, Fig. 48.)
STUDY 4SWING CURVES, PART 2
331
260
240
220
200
180
,...
I
160
r
'0
GJ
co
140
c
to
I
nI
120
g
Ci
c
"
lOa
G)
..,
.5
~
c:
Q)
'iii
80
c
e
to
60
40
20
0
 20 .........._'a_'_...A.."_........ ....._ ~ ..... ....
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Time (seconds)
FIG. 49. Swing curves, Study 4, part 2, stability run 9. Same as run 8, except
that clearing time was increased to 18 cycles. Unstable.
Run 9. With I8cycle clearing of the same fault the systems were
unstable (Fig. 49).
Run 10. The purpose of this run was to show the effect of three
phase faults farther away from station AA. The location selected
was a point about 1,000ft. from station AA on a 700,OOOcircularmil
cable supplied from the south bus. With the additional impedance of
this cable between station AA and the fault, the voltage at AA re
332 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
mained high enough to prevent the generator output from decreasing
as much as before, so that even with I8cycle clearing the system was
stable (see Fig. 50). The extreme oscillations of the station AJ
machine, as shown by its swing curve, should be discounted somewhat,
as they did not represent the true motion of the machine but were the
200r.r.............
180
Xli
160
i
f"04
140
!
!
.;1
4D
"0
120
.....
.!!
co
I
c
tV
100
I
g
to
80
c
..
..,
60
c
en
C
40
20
0
 20 ....... .r.._.....
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Time (seconds)
FIG. 50. Swing curves, Study 4, part 2, stability run 10. Same as run 9 except
that fault was 1,000 ft. from station AA south bus on 700,OOOcir.mil cable.
Stable.
result of inaccuracies caused by the use in the stepbystep calculations
of a time interval too long in comparison to the period of oscillation of
the machine.
Run 11. The purpose of this run was to showthe effect of removing
the bustie reactor at station AA, leaving the north and south busses
tied together through only the transformers and the 13.8
kv. network. In every other respect it was identical to run 9. Com
STUDY 4SWING CURVES, PART 2
333
parison of the swing curves of run 11 (Fig. 51) with those of ron 9
(Fig. 49) shows that splitting the bus at AA decreased the rate at
which systems A and B swung apart, but not sufficiently to allow
stability to be regained. Although this run was considered unstable,
220 .....,rrwr.....,tr,
200
180
160
en
Q,)
140
1)0
Q,)
"'C
Q,)
ao
120
e
to
S
100
g
;;
E
.!
80
.5
....
c
Q)
.iii
60 c:
e
...
40
20
0
 20 ....
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Time ( seconds)
FIG. 51. Swing curves, Study 4, part 2, stability run 11. Same as run 9 except
that station AA bus was split. Still unstable.
it represented a borderline condition, indicatingthat the systemswould
be stable under slightly more favorable conditions, such as appreciable
arc impedance in the fault or decreased power transfer on the inter
connection.
Run 12. The purpose of this run was to showthe effect on stability
of connecting system H to the AtoB line. System H was a metro
334 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
politansystem located near the center of the proposed interconnecting
line from AR to RD. It was represented as a 275Mva. generator tied
to the 154kv. line through a 30Mva. transformer, with zero inter
change of active and reactive power. Power of 45 Mw. was trans
180
160
140
,....
120
~
if
""
100
.....
I
c
.,
80
&
~
~
Ci
60
E
f
l
40
Iii
c:
S
20
0
~ 2 0
40
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Time (seconds)
FIG. 52. Swing curves, Study 4, part 2, stability run 12. 45.0 Mw. received at
station BD from substation AB. System H connected to the AtoB line with
0+;0 power interchange. Twolinetoground fault near substation AB on the
proposed 154kv. line to station BD, clearedin 6 cycles, linereclosed in 21 cycles.
Unstable.
mitted to BD from AB, necessitating a new generator on AA north bus
and requiring only one machine to be operated at BD. The power
delivered to system A from system D was raised to 37.4 Mw. by in
creasing the output of the system D generators already in operation.
With a twolinetoground fault at the sending end of the 154kv. inter
STUDY 4POWERANGLE CURVES, PART 2 335

 ~
V
""'"
'<
~ S y s t e m s
/
I
A,D,E,
I
nofault
/"
I
'"
1
I
Q)
/
00
, I;
~
/1
I ~
'\ l:c
v
I
I ~
I
I ~
I I ~
I I ~
I
I<.J
I
I
I
,
I
~ S y s t e m s
I
I
/
A,D,E,
I
~
......
"" fault on
I
V
~
I
.Y
200
220
i20
100
80
100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80
Rotor electrical angle (desrees)
FIG. 53. Poweranglecurves, Study 4, part 2, run 13. 5 Mw. receivedat station
BD from substation AB. Threephase fault on 13.8kv. feeder near station AA
north bus. Critical clearing angle, determined by equalarea method, is 34;
critical clearingtime, 24 cycles.
connecting line and with the usual clearing and reclosing times" the
systems were unstable. The swing curves (Fig. 52) show that systems
A, D, and E swung ahead together, whereas systems B, C, and H
swung very little. The power limit of the AtoB line for southward
power transfer with system H connected to the line was thus shown to
be less than 45 Mw. This limit was found more exactly as described
below.
240
Powerangle curves, part 2. Powerangle curves and the equalarea
criterion were used for (1) obtaining a curve showing the critical clear
ing time of a threephase fault close to the north bus of station AA
required to maintain stability of systems A, D, E with systems Band C
for any amount of power transferred from A to B; (2) determining the
power limit of the AtoB line for southward transfer with system H
connected.
Criticalclearing time of a threephase fault near 8tation AA 19.8kv.
336
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
north bus. To use the method mentioned it was necessary to reduce
the system to an equivalent twomachine system. Inspection of the
swing curves for runs 8 to 11 showed that the machines of systems A,
D, and E swung together and, therefore, could be combined with very
little error to one equivalent machine. The machines of system B
likewise swung together and could be combined, and system C was
regarded as an infinite bus. It was decided to combine the machines
v
",
~
...Systems
/
"<
A.D,E.
I
nofault
V
I
""
/
I
I
1
~
,
"
v:
leu
."
/
1"6"0
I
,e:
t'O
V
I
00
1.=
I
,5
I
I ' ~
I
I ~
I I
I I . ~
I
I=E
I
IU
I
I
J
ISystems
I
I A.D,E,
I I
fault on.
I

..... ...........
I
~
~
""'"
~
~ V
80
100 80 60 40 20 a 20 40 60 80
Rotor electrical angle (degrees)
FIG. 54. Poweranglecurves, Study 4, part 2, run 14. 15 Mw. receivedat station
BD from substation AB. Threephase fault on 13.8kv. feeder near station AA
north bus. Critical clearing angle is 37; critical clearing time, 18 cycles.
240
100
120
cJ)
t::
eu
~ 180
i
E
~ 160
...
::J
o
...
Q)
~ 140
Q.,0
200
220
of system B with those of system C and to represent them all as an
infinite bus. This procedure could be expected to give somewhat
pessimistic results because the speeding up of the machines of system B
to follow those of systems A, D, E was beneficial to stability.
Powerangle curves were obtained on the calculating board by the
following procedure: when possible, the initial conditions of each run
were made identical to those of a previous loadflow study. The
power received at station BD from substation AB was set to 5 Mw.,
15 Mw., 25 Mw., and 35 Mw. in runs 13, 14, 15, and 16, respectively;
STUDY 4POWERANGLE CURVES, PART 2 337
and the voltages of the 66kv. bus at AB and of the 132kv. bus at BD
were adjusted to normal values. The phase angle of the power source
representing the voltage back of transient reactance of the finite
ADE machine was then advanced in steps of about 15, both this
voltage and the voltage representing the infinite bus being held con
stant, and at each step the power output of the finite machine was
recorded. These results were plotted as the curves labelled "no fault"
 
V'
.........
"<
A,D,E,
/ I
nofault
1/
I
,
I
I
I'
VI!
I
"
l:i
I
I.e:
I
IJ 11
I
I
1
8
I
I
I
I
li
A, D, E,
L.
...
fault on
80
100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80
Rotor electrical angle (degrees)
FIG. 55. Powerangle curves, Study 4, part 2, run 15. 25 Mw. received at station
BD from substation AB. Threephase fault on 13.8kv. feeder near station AA
north bus. Critical clearin.g angle is 33; critical clearing time, 16 cycles:
240
120
100
200
220
in Figs. 53 to 56, inclusive. The angle scale in these figures is arbi
trary and is not the angle between the internal voltage of the finite
machine and the voltage of the infinite bus. For each value of power
transfer a second curve was obtained in similar manner, except with
the fault applied, and with the internal voltages held at the same
values as before. The critical clearing angle for each value of power
transfer was then obtained by the equal...area method, and the cor
responding critical clearing time was found from a swing curve calcu
lated by use of the values of power read from the powerangle curve.
338
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
The kinetic energy of the ADE machine was taken as 1,361 Mi.
The swing curves are given in Fig. 57.
The desired curve of power transfer versus critical clearing time was
then plotted and is shown in Fig. 58. The results of stability runs 8
and 9 are consistent with this curve: for 25Mw. transfer the system
was stable with 12cycle clearing and unstable with 18cycle clearing.
I
I A,D,E
./ , nofault
Vi '"
220
240.......,,....,
120If+!"ffi+ift
100 ........+_+____t_+____Pt____t
80 60
80'...... .................... .....
100 80 .. 60 40 20 0 20 40
Rotor electrical angle
FIG. 56. Powerangle curves, Study 4, part 2, run 16. 35 Mw. received at
station BD fromsubstation AB. Threephase fault on lS.8kv. feeder near station
AA north bus. Critical clearing angle is 45; critical clearing time, 11 cycles,
Power limit oj AtoB line with system H connected. The swing
curves of run 12 indicate that the machines of systems B, C, and H may
be regarded as an infinite bus and those of systems A, D,and E as a
single finite machine. Powerangle curves with no fault and again
with a twolinetoground fault near AB were obtained. It seemed
permissible to use the same powerangle curves for all values of initial
power transfer, because in runs 13 to 16 the voltage behind transient
reactance varied only 3% over the range of power transfer that was
considered. With the fault cleared, the power transfer over the inter
STUDY 4POWERANGLE CURVES, PART 2 339
connection became zero, but the output of the finite machine did not
become zero because it was supplying local load. Its output with the
line open, however, was independent of angle and was found from
previous load studies, as follows: The total load on systems A, D, and
E, when operating with zero interchange with system B, was deter
mined from one load run, and the total load plus losseswhen delivering
20 0
...
40
_ 20
en en
i
Q)
!
60 i 40 "0
Q) Q)
lib lib
c c:
e
80
e 60
100 80
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Time (seconds) Time (seconds)
(a) (b)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Time (seconds)
(cl)
100
::7f
I
i
J
o
80
o
Q)
bO
c:
e 60
 20
"0 40
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Time (seconds)
(c)
80 '"""....................
o
o
_  20
e
r
40
j
. 60
FIG. 57. Swing curves used in connection with the powerangle curves of Figs.
53 to 56 to determine critical clearing times.
45 Mw. to system B was obtained from another load run. The differ
ence between these figures gave the decrease in losses which would
occur on opening the 154kv. interconnecting line, normal voltage
conditions being assumed. This decrease in losses was expressed as a
percentage of the power sent into the 154kv. line. To determine the
output with the fault cleared, the percentage found as just described
was added to the input to the 154kv. line, and the augmented input
was subtracted from the output of the initial operating conditions.
340
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
\
\ Unstable
,
Stable
1\
\
,
~
\
,
o
o
~ 30
;
~
Q)
E
"0 20
~
Q,)
. ~
Q)
"0
10 20
Clearing time(cycles)
FIG. 58. Curve of power delivered
to station BD from substation AB
over proposed 154kv. interconnect
ing line versus critical clearing time
of a threephase fault on a 13.8kv.
feeder near station AA north bus.
Based on the results of runs 13 to 16,
Study 4, part 2.
The critical reclosing time was found by use of the equalarea method
and swing curves (Figs. 59 to 61) for transfers of 25, 35, and 45 Mw.,
using a clearing time of 6 cycles in every case. The clearing angle
corresponding to the clearing time of 6 cycles was found by computing
the swing curve up to this point. The critical reclosing angle was then
40 found by the equalarea method, and
the corresponding reclosing time was
obtained by extending the swing
curve to this angle.
A curve of critical reclosing time
versus power transfer was plotted
and may be seen in Fig. 62. From
this curve the power limit for 21
cycles reclosing time is read as 42
Mw, This is consistent with the re
sult of stability run 12, in which the
system was found to be unstable with
45 Mw. transfer and 21cycle reclos
30 ing. The practical power capacity
was taken as 35 Mw.
Conclusions. The following cOI\
elusions were among those reached
as a result of Study 4:
Capacity of interconnection between
systems A and B. The power ca
pacityof the proposed 154kv. inter
connection between systems A and
B, based on the maintenance of syn
chronism through a twolinetoground fault on the interconnecting
line, with 6cycle clearing and 21cycle reclosing, and allowing a mar
gin of at least 5 Mw. for momentary fluctuations in power on the line,
would be 25 Mw. received in system B or 35 Mw. received in system
A. These values would hold for either of the two routes considered.
If system H were connected to the line, the power received in system
B might be increased to 35 Mw, In arriving at these limits it was
assumed that automatic equipment for controlling the interchange
power flow would be installed and used, and that highspeed relaying
and switching would be provided on critical circuits within systems A
and B as well as on the interconnecting line itself. The connection
of systems F and G to system B would be beneficial to stability but
would not have enough effect to warrant the assignment of higher
power ratings to the interconnection. The capacity of the intercon
STUDY 4CONCLUSIONS 341
I I I
Critical reclosing time
r
'I 1'
Swing Power output
V
ff),
Systems A, D,E,
1/
V
nofault
V
/
V
V
/
V Critical
reclosing
/ /
V angle",
v
V
. "
 j
K
7
17
7 7 7
77 77
,
/
f'/f///f'/// '///
\
,'/
r
I
angle
V
,........
[7
.\ :10
V
r.
'//M '/// 1//./ 1/// ///
Power output
7
Systems A, D,E,
'./
" Power output
fault on
Systems A, D, E,
lineopen
260
0.6
en
240 "'0
c
0
0.4
....,
CD
E 220
i=
0.2
(I)
=
co
E
0
j
cf 180
'160
140
nection, if a loss of synchronism were allowable during a fault on the
interconnecting line 'or on other critical circuits, would be approxi
mately 35 to 40 Mw. in either direction.
Speed of fault clearing. To avoid instability when the interconnec
tion was delivering its rated load of 25 Mw. to system B, it would be
0.8
120
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Rotor electrical angle (degrees)
FIG. 59. Powerangle curves and swing curve, Study 4, part 2, run 17. 25 Mw.
received at station BD from substation AB. TwoJinetogroundfault near sub
station AB on proposed 154kv. interconnecting line to station RD. Clearing
time, 6 cycles. Critical reclosingtime, 42 cycles.
necessary to use highspeed relaying and switching on some of the
circuits of company A. Threephase faults near station AA 13.8kv.
or 66kv. busses and near substation AB 66kv. bus must be cleared in
12 cycles or less. The time for clearing threephase faults on the
13.8kv. network might be increased to 18 cycles if the fault was
separated from the bus by 1,000 feet or more of 700,OOOcircularmil
cable or by an equivalent impedance. If the station AA bus was
sectionalized, threephase faults on or near the bus must be cleared in
16 cycles or less.
342 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
1 I I I I
7
Critical reclosing time
l/

,I. ,I.
I
V
11
Swing curve:>
I
I./:' Power output
I
/"
1

bi
Systems A, D, E, 
/
rnf/
no fault
/ /.
V
v
V
r,,1o.
j )
V Critical
"
I /

I
I
J
V
reclosing
'//J.
JV
Inputt:
J
[7
I
r Clearing angle
V
,.........
rr
V
r...
Power output
4
Systems A, D,E,
'/
\ Power output
fault on
Systems A, D, E.
lineopen
260

.g 0.4
c
0
240 4n

U
0.2
220
0
;;;
=
cv
&200
E
...
Q)
e. 180
160
140
Highspeed relaying and switching might be necessary also on several
of the transmission lines of company B, but further studies would be
required, after the terminal of the line had been selected, to determine
the extent of such changes.
Terminal transformer capacity. The transformer at substation AB
should have a capacity of 45 Mva. and that at either station BD or
0.6
120
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Rotor electrical angle (degrees)
FIG. 60. Powerangle curves and swing curve, Study 4, part 2, run 18. 35 Mw.
received at station BD from substation AB. Twolinetoground fault near sub
station AB on proposed 154kv. interconnecting line to station RD. Clearing time,
6 cycles. Critical reclosingtime, 31 cycles.
substation BCshould have a capacity of 50 Mva. Both these trans
formers should have tertiary windings rated 15 Mva. for connection
to synchronous condensers or static reactors.
The capacity of the 13.8/66kv. transformers at station AA should
be increased from 20 Mva. to 45 Mva,
The line as built. The interconnection between companies A and B
was built and put into service in 1942. The line was 268.5 miles long
STUDY4THE LINE AS BUILT
343
with terminals at substations AB and Be and no intermediate switch
ing stations nor taps. (The route finally selected was longer than the
one assumed in the preliminary studies.) It was a singlecircuit 154
kv. line. The phase conductors were 250,OOOcircularmil, hollow,
harddrawn copper cables of O.u83inch diameter, supported by strings
0.4
;;
260
"0
e
0
! 0.2
Q,)
240 E
i=
0
220

IV
200
t]G
Q)
E

i
180
160
140
, I I
Critical ......... Swing curve
_ reclosing time
P(
. /
I Clearing r
I
""""'"'"
"",."."
Power output
J
Systems A, D,E, 
1 '
r
nofault
1/
I
/v
InputP,../'
,
I I
)/
I\.
reclosing
....V
angle
1\
Clearing
v: Power output
\
I
Systems A, D,E, 
angle""",,
i=3
fault on

V

..... '///1
.,V
t"" .
",
"" Power output
V
Systems A, D,E,
lineopen
120
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Rotor electrical angle (degrees)
FIG. 61. Poweranglecurves and swing curve, Study 4, part 2, run 19. 45 Mw.
received at station BD from substation AB. Twolinetoground fault near sub
station AB on proposed 154kv. interconnecting line to station BD. Clearing time,
6 cycles. Critical reelosing time, 16 cycles.
of ten 10inch suspension insulators. They were spaced 14 ft. 6 in.
apart in a horizontal plane (18 ft. 3 in. equivalent spacing). There
were two iinch highstrength galvanizedsteel ground wires 12 ft.
above the phase conductors .at structures and 20 ft. above them at
midspan. The structures were wooden H frames. There were three
complete transposition barrels in the line.
At substation AB there was a 40Mva. 161/69/13.8kv. threewind
ing transformer bank, and at substation Be, a 45Mva. 161/138/12.5
344
TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
~ ~
'"~
..
,
Unstable
, , ~
Stable
"'.
<,
,
"'0
e
~
~ 20
"'0
J
kv. autotransformer bank. At each terminal there were three 5Mvar.
static reactors connected to the tertiary windings.
Because of the length of the line it was necessary to develop and use a
new type of highspeed relay system which could distinguish between
faults and power swings even though the magnitude of indicated
impedance might be nearly the same.
2
,3 Internal faults in the ter
minal transformers were cleared by differential relays which tripped
50
40
10
o
o 10 20 30 40 50
Reclosing time ( cycles)
Constant clearing time, 6 cycles
FIG. 62. Curve of power delivered to station BD from substation AB over pro
posed 154kv. interconnecting line versus critical reclosing time for a twolineto
ground fault on this line near substation AB, cleared in 6 cycles. Based on the
results of runs 17 to 19, Study 4, part 2.
open the lowvoltage oil circuit breakers (66 kv. at AB, 132 kv. at
BC)and tripped closed a threepole grounding switch on the 154kv.
side, causing the breakers at the distant end of the line to open.
Stagedfault tests." After the line had been constructed and was
ready for service, a number of staged faults were placed on the line to
check the operation of the new longline relays and to check the tran
sientstability power limits found in the calculatingboard studies which
have been described. Some faults were placed on the 154kv. inter
connecting line itself, others on 60kv., 66kv., and 132kv. lines near
its terminals. The first group of fourteen tests was made with sys
terns A and B synchronized but with almost no power flow on the
interconnection. In these tests a few incorrect relay operations were
T
A
B
L
E
1
2
S
T
A
G
E
D
T
w
o

L
I
N
E

T
o

G
R
O
U
N
D
F
A
U
L
T
T
E
S
T
S
O
N
1
5
4

K
v
.
I
N
T
E
R
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
A
A
N
D
B
W
I
T
H
P
O
W
E
R
I
N
T
E
R
C
H
A
N
G
E
(
S
T
U
D
Y
4
)
0
0
~
F
a
u
l
t
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
o
w
e
r
F
l
o
w
o
n
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
R
e
c
l
o
s
i
n
g
d t
j
T
e
s
t
I
f
A
t
,
I
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
T
i
m
e
(
c
y
c
l
e
s
)
T
i
m
e
(
c
y
c
l
e
s
)
S
t
a
b
l
e
o
r
~
N
u
m
b
e
r
L
i
n
e
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
N
e
a
r
O
n
L
i
n
e
A
.
A
.
A
i
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
~
,
,
r
.
.
,
~
,
I
(
k
v
.
)
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
M
w
.
R
e
c
'
d
a
t
a
t
A
B
a
t
B
C
s
t
A
B
a
t
B
C
U
2
t

3
>
1
1
5
4
A
B
B
e
1
5
B
C
6
.
8
6
.
8
2
1
.
2
2
4
.
2
S
t
a
b
l
e
0 t
:
r
j
2
1
5
4
A
B
B
e
3
0
B
e
6
.
5
7
.
5
2
1
.
5
2
4
.
5
S
t
a
b
l
e
e
3
6
6
A
B
E
A
2
8
B
C
1
0
.
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
S
t
a
b
l
e
~
3
A
1
3
2
B
e
B
D
2
9
B
C
1
0
.
0
S
t
a
b
l
e
>
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
4
1
5
4
B
C
A
B
3
5
A
B
1
0
.
0
6
.
0
2
6
.
2
2
3
.
0
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
*
E
:
3
4
A
1
5
4
B
C
A
B
2
6
A
B
1
9
.
0
t
5
.
5
3
4
.
5
2
2
.
0
U
n
s
t
a
b
l
e
t
t

3
4
B
1
5
4
B
C
A
B
3
1
A
B
1
0
.
0
6
.
0
2
5
.
8
2
2
.
5
S
t
a
b
l
e
t
:
r
j
5
1
3
2
B
e
B
D
3
4
A
B
8
.
5
S
t
a
b
l
e
U
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t

3
0
0
*
S
y
n
c
h
r
o
n
i
s
m
l
o
s
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
B
a
n
d
F
.
t
R
e
l
a
y
t
r
o
u
b
l
e
a
t
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
B
c
a
u
s
e
d
s
l
o
w
t
r
i
p
p
i
n
g
.
~
346 TYPICAL STABILITY STUDIES
M,
1.2
<,
I I
~
1
Unstable
"
IV
~
4
1
4
"
I ~
~ B
2'
~
4A
Stable
'I'\..
I
~ ~
N
Stable Unstable
~ Test ~ A
Calculated 0
40
discovered, which led to some changes in the connections and adjust
ments of the relays and circuitbreaker control. The second group of
eight tests were made with various amounts and directions of power
interchange. Oscillographic records were made of eighteen currents
or voltages in the main and control circuits, making possible the
determination of the sequence and time of various operations. The
tests of the second group are summarized in Table 12.
50
o
o 10 20 30 40
Reclosing time of terminal breakp.rs (cycles)
FIG. 63. Approximate curve of transientstability power limit as a function of
reclosing time for faults on the 154kv. interconnection of companies A and B,
Study 4. Points from stagedfault tests. and from calculatingboard results are
plotted.
With the exception of tests 4 and 4A, in which synchronism was lost,
power swings observed throughout the interconnected systems were
small.
After the application of faults on the 154kv. line the terminal
breakers successfully cleared the fault and reclosed in every case where
they were intended to do so. The same breakers remained closed in
every test in which a fault was applied to other lines, indicating proper
functioning of the relays during external faults.
Study of the test results revealed that the expected 21 or 22cycle
overall time from fault to final reclosure of the second breaker was not
being obtained on account of a delay of from 2 to 4 cycles in the relay
action at the end of the line remote from the fault. This trouble was
corrected subsequently.
REFERENCES 347
In order to correlate the tests with the results of stability runs made
on the calculating board, Fig. 63 was prepared. Here points rep
resenting the stagedfault test results and other points representing
the calculatingboard results with line terminal at substation Be are
plotted with delivered power as ordinate and reclosingtime as abscissa.
The sloping line MN separates the region of stability from the region
of instability. The test results agree reasonably well with the results
of the board studies. Exact agreement cannot be expected because
the conditions existing at the time of the stagedfault tests differred
from the conditions assumed in the calculatingboard studies. In
particular, the interconnection between systems Band C, assumed in
the calculations, had not yet been built. Even if it' had been, it
would not have been feasible to schedule power flow and generation in
five or more power systems in several states in such manner as to
duplicate the conditions assumed in calculation.
REFERENCES
1. R. C. BERGVALL, "Series Resistance Method of Increasing TransientStability
Limit," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 50, pp. 4904, June, 1931; disc., pp, 4947.
2. F. C. POAGE, C. A. STREIFUS, D. M. MACGREGOR, and E. E. GEORGE,
"Performance Requirements for Relays on Unusually Long Transmission Lines,"
A.l.E.E. Trans., vol. 62, pp, 27583, June, 1943.
3. A. R. VAN C. WARRINGTON, "Protective Relaying for Long Transmission
Lines," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 62, pp. 2618, June, 1943.
4. C. W. MINARD, R. B. Gow, W. A. WOLFE, and E. A. SWANSON, "Staged
Fault Tests of Relaying and Stability on KansasNebraska 27QMile 154kv.
Interconnection," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 62, pp. 35867, 1943; disc., pp.4256.
INDEX
Acceleration, 15, 16
angular, 17, 19
Adjustment of initial operating condi
tions, 77
Admittances, drivingpoint, 806
mutual, 806
self,806
terminal, 806, 95
transfer, 806
Algebraic solution of networks, 78101
Alpha, beta, zero components, 245
Alternatingcurrent calculating board,
64
American Gas and Electric Company,
288,290
Amplifiers for instruments on ac.
board, 70, 73
Analogies between translation and rota
tion, 20
Analogue, mechanical, 7
Angle, 17, 19
Angular acceleration, 17, 19
Angular momentum, 19
Angular velocity, 17, 19
Apparatus base, 54
Assumptions made in stability studies,
43
Autotransformers, 58
on ac. board, 68, 69, 72, 73, 74
zerosequence equivalent circuit of,
239
Bad effects of instability, 9
Base impedance, 55
Base quantities, for ac. board, 66,
72
choice of, 75
for perunit system, 54
Board, ac. calculating, 64
349
Braking effect of grounding resistor,
241
Breakers, data required on, 63
eightcycle, need for, Study 3, 310
Bus, infinite, 124
Bus reactors at Philo, 290, 294, 300
Busses, effect of, on stability, 190
Byrd, H. L., 168
Cables, data required on, 63
equivalent circuits, 59
Calculating board, ac., 64
procedure for using, 75
Capacitance of transmission lines,
representation of, 60
Capacitors, on ac. board, 67, 68, 73, 74
series, 189
Carriercurrent relaying needed, Study
3,310
Check list of data required for transient
stability study, 62
Checks on readings, 78
Circuit breakers, data required on, 63
eightcycle, need for, Study 3, 310
Cleared fault, application of equalarea
criterion to, 129
Clearing angle, 130
determination of, by precalculated
. swing curves, 157, 158
Clearing time, 139
allowable, Study 1, 286
critical, curves for determining, 168
85
determination of, by precalculated
swing curves, 157, 1,P8
effect of, on transient stability, 159
Combining machines, 111, 264, 319
Common voltage, referring quantities
to, 56
350
INDEX
Components, alpha, beta, zero, 245
symmetrical, 193
Composite line, 60
Condenser, synchronous, data required
on, 63
mechanical analogue of, 8
Study 1, 2967
treatment of, in transientstability
study, 119
Connections on ac. board, 69, 77
changes of, 78
Conversion, of impedances, 54
starmesh, 867
Coordinates, symmetrical, 193
twophase, 245
Correction factors for equivalent 1r cir
cuit of transmission line, 59
Coupled lines, equivalent circuits of,
234
Critical clearing angle, 130, 136
determined by precalculated swing
curves, 157, 158
Critical clearing time, curves for deter
mining, 16885
determined by precalculated swing
curves, 151, 157
Damper winding, 11
D8IDping, 5,43,122,123
Data required for transientstability
study, 62
Dead sequence networks, 210
Difference equation (problems), 51
Dimensions of quantities of mechanics,
15, 179
Discontinuities in pointbypoint solu
tion of swing equation, 38
Double unbalances, 232
Duration of fault, effect of, on stability,
159, 185, 224
Ebasco Services, Inc., 254, 311
Energy, kinetic or stored, 16, 20, 236
of synchronous machines, 25,
2568, 292, 305, 3156; seealso
Inertia constant
rotational, 20, 236
Equalarea criterion, 122
Equalarea criterion, Study 4, 33543
Equipment, miscellaneous, 61
Equivalent circuits, of coupled lines,
234
of remote portions of system, 61
of transformer, 56
negativesequence, 235
zerosequence, 23540
of transmission lines and cables, 59
Equivalent generator, 6
Equivalent impedance of transformers,
54,56
Equivalent inertia constant of two
machine system, 133
Equivalent input of twomachine
system, 133, 136
Equivalent motor, 6
Equivalent output of twomachine
system, 133, 136
Equivalent pi (71") circuit of transmis
sion line, 59
Equivalent powerangle curve of two
finite machines, 133
Equivalent T circuit of transformer,
56
Factors affecting stability, 187
Fault, close to generator, 78
effect on stability, 5
of duration of, 159, 185, 224
of type of, 223
shown by mechanical analogue, 9
Fault impedance, 228
Fault location, effect of, on stability,
189
Fault locations, Study 1, 265
Study 3,302
Fault shunts, 220, 231
Faulted threephase networks, solution
of, 193
Faults, relative number of various types
of, 225
relative severity of various types of,
223
representation of, in symmetrical
components, 205, 22830
in twophase coordinates, 247
simultaneous, 232
INDEX
351
Finite machines, 132
Flux linkage of field winding, 123
Force, 15, 16
Formal solution of swing equation, 28,
32
Frequency, effect of, on stability, 189
used on ac. board, 66, 72
Frequency changer, 189
(problem), 51
General Electric Ac. Network Ana
lyzer,66
Generator units of ac. board, 66, 68,
72,74
Generators, data required on, 62
representation of, 56
Governor, 5, 122
Graphical integration, determination of
swing curve by, 139
Grounding, effect of, on stability,
240
Grounding impedance, 237
effect of, on stability, 240
of autotransformer, 240
H (constant), 246
Highvoltage bussing, effect of, on sta
bility, 190
Historical review, 11
Hunting, 11
Impedance, base, 55
fault, 228
grounding, 238
negativesequence, 201
perunit, 55
positivesequence, 201
series, representation of, 231
transformer, 56
zerosequence, 201
effect of grounding on, 241
mutual, of lines, 233
Impedance diagram, 53
Impedance units on ac. board, 67, 68,
73,74
Inertia, moment of, 18, 19
Inertia constant, 22
effect of, on stability, 188
Inertia constant, equivalent, of. two
machine system, 133
of combined machines, 111
of remote portion of system, 62
Infinite bus, 124
Initial operating conditions, 77, 78
Input assumed constant, 43
Instability, bad effects of, 9
definition of, 1
Instantaneous clearing, stability limit
for, 160, 164
determination of, by curve, 176
Instruments on ac. board, 70, 71
Integration, graphical, determination of
swing curve by, 139
Interconnecting lines, Study 4, 314, 342
Interconnection, 12
Interconnections, effect of, on stability,
Study 2, 294301
Intermediate busses, effect of, on sta
bility, 190
Internal voltages, effect of, on stabil
ity, 2,188
Joule (unit), 15
Jumper circuits on ac. board, 69
Junction, threephase, 202
I{inetic energy, 16, 20, 236
in equalarea criterion, 125
of synchronous machines, 25, 2568,
292, 305, 3156; see also Inertia
constant
rotational, 20, 236
Kirchhoff's laws, 202
Laws of mechanics, 15
Length, 15
Limitations of system, 77
Lineimpedance units of ac. board, 67,
68,73,74
Linetoground fault, 207, 248
fault shunt, 220, 231
with fault impedance, 229
Linetoline fault, 207, 212, 248
fault shunt, 220231
with fault impedance, 229
Lines, transmission, representationof, 59
352 INDEX
Lines, zerosequence mutual impedance
of, 233
Load adjuster, 73
Loadimpedance units of ac. board, 67,
68;73, 74
adjustment of, 73, 77
Loads, data required on, 63
representation of, 61
Location of fault, effect of, on stability,
189
Mass, 15
Master instruments of ac. board, 70,
73,75
McClure, J. B., 149
Mechanical analogue, 7
Mechanics, laws of, 15
Mesh, threephase, 203
Mesh circuit, 82, 110
Metropolitan systems, 12, 187
M.k.s. system, 15
Modified time, 149, 169, 178
Moment of inertia, 18, 19
Momentum, 15, 16
angular, 19
Motorgenerator set for ac. board, 71
Motors, large synchronous, data re
quired on, 63
Multicircuit transformers, zero
sequence equivalent circuit of,
238
Multimachine system, 6, 122, 191
Mutual impedance base, 55
Mutual impedance of parallel transmis
sion lines, 61
zerosequence, 233
Mutual reactors on ac. board, 68, 69,
74
Mutual transformers on ac. board, 68,
69, 74
Negative sequence, 193, 194
Negativesequence equivalent circuit
of transformer, 235
Negativesequence impedance, 201
Negativesequence network, 203, 212
Network, negativesequence, 203, 212
poffitivesequence, 53,203,212
Network, zerosequence, 203, 212
Network analyzer, 64
General Electric, 66
Westinghouse, 72
Network calculator, 64
Network reduction, 83, 2135
algebraic, 83
calculatingboard method of, 109
symbols used in, 90
Network reexpansion, 2168
Network solution, algebraic, 78101
Networks, sequence, 203
solution of, 53
solution of faulted threephase, 193
substitute, 247
Newton (unit), 15
Nodes, 83
Nominal pi (1r) circuit of transmission
line, 59
Nominal voltage and current of ac.
board, 66, 72
Ohio Power Company, 290
Oneline diagram, 53
Open circuits, representation of, by
connections between sequence
networks, 231
Parallel transmission lines, 61
effect of, on stability, 189, 190
Percent quantities, 56
Perunit quantities, 54
Phase shift in transformers, 59, 235
Phase shifters on ac. board, 66, 72, 73
Philo station, 2902
Pi (1r) circuits of transmission line, 59
Pointbypoint solution of the swing
equation, 27
discontinuities, 38
errors, 34, 42
Polarity of connections on ac. board,
69,76
Positive direction of circuit units on ac.
board, 69, 76
Positive sequence, 193, 194
Positivesequence impedance, 201
Positivesequence network, 53, 203
use of, for x and y networks, 248
INDEX
353
Postfault output curve, 129, 131
Power (mechanics), 15, 16
in rotation, 19
Powerangle curve, 2, 3, 125, 126
equivalent, of two finite machines,
133, 135
Powerangle curves, Study 4, 3358,
3413
Powerangle equation, 2, 78
one machine and infinite bus, 126
two finite machines, 133
twomachine reactance system, 135
Power limit, 6
method of determining, Study 4, 318
Power supply of ac. board, 71
Precalculated swing curves, 14959
Prefault output curve, 12931
Pritchard, S. R., Jr. 168
Radian, 17, 19
Reactance, effect of, on stability, 2, 188
of synchronous machines, 56
of transformers, 57
of transmission lines, 61
zerosequence, 233
transient, 2568, 292, 3156
decrease of, to aid stability, 276
Reactive power, sign of, 79
Reactors, data required on, 63
grounding, effect of, on stability, 241
on ae. board, 67, 68, 73, 74
correction for resistance of, 76
shunt, use of, to aid stability, 273
special, on Westinghouse ac. board,
73
Readings on ac. board, 78
Reclosing, highspeed, Study 4, 317
Reclosing time, critical, Study 4, 340,
344, 346
Reduction, of network, 83
algebraic, 83
calculatingboard method of, 109
symbols used in, 90
of sequence networks, 2135
Reexpansion of networks, 2168
Referring quantities to a common vol
tage,56
Regulating transformers, 59
Regulator, induction voltage, on ac.
board, 66, 72
voltage, 11
effect of, 123
Relays, longline, 344
protective, data required on, 63
false operation of, 10
Remote portions of system, 62
Resistors, grounding, effect of, on sta
bility, 241
on ac. board, 67, 68, 73, 74
series, use of, to aid stability, 273
Rotation, analogies of, to translation,
20
laws of, 17, 19
Scalar instruments on ac. board, 73
Sectionalised operation, 301
Sequence, negative, 1934
positive, 193, 194
zero, 194
Sequenceirnpedances, 200
Sequence networks, 203, 212
connections between, for represen
ting faults, 205
for representing, faults with impe
dance, 22830
for representing open circuits, 231
Series capacitors, 189
Series impedances, representation of,
by connections between sequence
networks, 231
Series resistors, use of, to aid stability,
273
Severity of types of faults, 223
Short circuit, effect of, on stability, 5
representation of, by connections
between the sequence networks,
205, 22830
by connections between the sub
stitute networks, 247
types of, 205
Shortcircuit impedance of transform
ers, 54, 56
Shunt reactors used to aid stability, 273
Shunts for representing faults, 220, 231
Simplification of systems, Study 4,318
Simultaneous faults, 232
354 INDEX
Solution, of faulted threephase net
works, 193
of networks, algebraic, 78101
Stability, certain factors affecting, 187
definition of, 1
transient, summary of methods of
calculating, 185
Stability limit, effect of faultclearing
time on, 159, 167
effect of type of fault on, 223
steadystate, 4
transient, 5, 6
Stability studies, assumptions made in,
43
typical, 253
Stagedfault tests, Study 4, 344
Starmesh conversion, 867
Steadystate stability limit, 4
Study 4,318
Steam turbogenerators, stored energy
of, 25
Stepbystep solution of the swing
equation, 27
discontinuities, 38
errors, 34,42
Stored energy, seeKinetic energy
Studies, typical stability, 253347
Study 1, 254
Study 2,290
Study 3,301
Study 4,311
Substitute networks, 247
Summary of methods of calculating
transient stability, 185
Summers, I. H., 149
Sustained fault, application of equal
area criterion to, 127
stability limit for, 161, 164
determination of, by curve, 176
Swingcurves, 28, 32, 48, 103, 1.09, 144
determination of, by graphical inte
gration, 139
precalculated, 14959
Study 1, 26585
Study 2, 296,.297, 300
Study 3, 3069
Study 4, 32234, 339
Swing equation, 20
Swing equation, formal solution of, 28,
32
pointbypoint solution of, 27
errors, 34, 42
Symmetrical components, 193
Synchronous condenser, data required
on, 63
mechanical analogue of, 8
Study 1, 2967
treatment of, in transientBtability
study, 119
Synchronous machines, kinetic energy
of, 25, 2568, 292, 305, 3156
reactance of, 2568, 292, 3156
representation of, 1, 434,56
Synchronous motors, data required on,
63
System base, 55
T circuit of transmission line, 60
Tapped loads, 61
(problem), 120
Threecircuit transformer, 318
zerosequence equivalent circuit of,
238
Threephase fault, 209, 248
fault shunt, 220, 231
with fault impedance, 229
Threephase networks, solution of
faulted, 193
Threephase transformers, zero
sequence equivalent circuit of,
239
Time, 15
modified, 149, 169, 178
Torque, 17, 19
Transformer banks, 59
Transformers, data. required on, 63
equivalent circuits of, 56
impedance of, 56
multicircuit, 58
zerosequence equivalent circuit
of, 238
negativesequence equivalent circuit
of, 235
perunit quantities of, 54
phase shift in, 235
reactances of (table), 57
INDEX 3S5
Transformers, regulating, 59
representation of, 56
in the sequence networks, 235
threecircuit, 57, 318
zerosequenceequivalent circuit of,
238
threephase, 59
zerosequence equivalent circuit
of, 239
twocircuit,' 56
zerosequence equivalent circuit of,
235
Transient reactance, decrease of, to aid
stability, 276
values of, 2568, 292, 3156
voltage behind, 123
Transient stability,certaiIL factors af
fecting, 187
summary of methods of calculating,
185
Transient stability limit, 5, 6
determination of, by equalarea ori
terion,128
Study 4, 318, 340, 346
Translation, analogies of, to rotation, 20
laws of, 15
Transmission, longdistance, 12
Transmission lines, constants of, 61
data required on, 63
equivalent circuits, 59
Turbogenerators, stored energy of, 25,
2569, 292, 305, 3156
Twolinetoground fault, 209, 248
fault shunt for, 220, 231
with fault impedance, 229
Twomachine system, 1, 7, 122, 149
equivalent inertia constant of, 133
equivalent input of, 133, 136
equivalent output of, 133, 136
Twophase coordinates, 245
Unbalances, double, 232
Units of quantities of mechanics, 15,
19
Varmeter on ac. board, 70, 73
Vector instruments, 71, 73
Vector measurements on ac. board, 71,
73
Vector power, 79
Velocity, 15
angular, 17
Voltage, behind transient reactance,
123
of transmission, effect of, on stabil
ity, 189
Voltage regulators, 11
effect of, 123
Waterwheel generators, stored energy
of, 25, 2569, 3156
Wattmetervarmeter on ac. board, 70,
73
Westinghouse .Ac. Network Calcula
tor, 72
Work, 15
of rotation, 18
WR2 (moment of inertia), 23, 2569,
305, 3156
Zero sequence, 194
Zerosequence equivalent circuit of
transformers, 23540
Zerosequenceimpedance,201
effect of grounding OD, 241
of transformer, 236
Zerosequence mutual impedance of
lines, 233
Zerosequence network, 203, 233
representation of lines in, 233
Zerosequence reactance of lines, 233