78 1387

b b

78 1387

7











: 1385 : 1386

1383 2 .

.
1
KGS3 KGS4 2665/6 2638 /8 2771/3
.
. ) ( MP
) (0/939 1 ) (0/793 5
. ) (658/95 KGS3
.
:

159

 ...

Pajouhesh & Sazandegi No 78 pp: 159-164

The study of low irrigation effect on yield of seven grain sorghum cultivars with use of drought tolerance indices
By: M. A. Shirazi Kharrazi., University of Payam-e- Noor, Zahedan
M. R. Naroui rad- Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Sistan
H. Kazemi- University of Tabriz
R. Asghari- University of Ardabil
B. Alizadeh- Seed and Plant Improvement Institute
In order to study of low irrigation on seven grain sorghum yield in sistan region one experiment carried out as split plot in
base design of randomized complete block design with 3 replications. Cultivars inserted in sub plot and 2 levels irrigation
(normal and low irrigation) inserted in main plot as in normal condition irrigation continued to harvest stage but in low
irrigation condition in panicle appearance irrigation interrupted to harvest stage.Analysis of variance showed there are
significant difference among cultivars for grain yield in 1% level. Comparison means showed cultivars kimia, KGS3 and
KGS4 with 2638.8 , 2665.6 and 2771.3 kg/ha had the most yield respectively.In order to study of drought stress indices,
cultivars was studied by this indices. MP indice showed the high positive and significant correlation in 1% level with grain
yield in drought condition (0.939) and 5% level (0.793) in normal condition and was selected the best indice for selection of
tolerance cultivars , and on base of amount this indice (658.95) KGS3 cultivar was known as tolerate cultivar.
Key words: Sorghum , Stress , Yield , Irrigation

) (19



STI
. ) ( 2

STI GMP
. ) ( 7
) ( 11

. ) ( 18
STI
SSI


.


120180
.

) .(16 15 14 10



) .(2015 14 13 5
) ( 17
STI
MP GMP STI
TOL .

.

.



) .(24 :
)(
) .(23


) .(21

.

160

 78 1387

) .(15 14 4
7 10
) .(19
).(26 25 3
) .(5

6 7 )5
.(14 8 ) ( 6
GMP
STI
.

8 ).(12

KGS2 KGS3 KGS4
.
.
1383




0/3 0/5

.
3/6

.

. .

2 .

.

.

SAS
4 321 5
.
1-
2-

3-
ys
yp
SI

4-

1-

yp ys

5-

yp

=SSI
=STI

) (1
1.

.

5 :

.1 ) (

)(1

)(2

2
1
2
6
6
24

)(

44/22
3781/19
122/80
*201/49
25/69
59/57

7/425
45/69
6/37
*160/05
5/43
5/99

0/19
5/93
2/03
**7/09
0/37
0/71

0/04
1/26
0/2
*0/16
0/04
0/04

9/24

12/43

21/16

7/51

0/149
11/005
9/86
**1/57
0/008
0/022

0/05
0/40
0/08
**0/87
0/28
0/14

23/54

16/96

* ns ** 5 1

161

 ...
.2 5

cm

cm

cm

83/55ABC

22/08AB

3/44C

2/90ABC

80/25BC

18/44C

3/27C

2/69C

2/67AB

81/28BC

19/28BC

3/65BC

2/86ABC

2/28ABC

1861AB

KGS2

76/11C

20/05BC

3/47C

2/68C

1/83CD

1194B

KGS3

92/61A

24/50A

6/23A

3/02AB

2/30ABC

2665A

KGS4

80/89BC

24/22A

4/60B

3/13A

1/71D

2771A

89/94AB

9/25D

3/29C

2/81BC

2/21BC

1775AB

gr

Kg/ha

2/73A

2638A
1750AB

5
.3

YP

YS

Kg/ha-1

Kg/ha-1

1910

1100

0/498

1850

583

0/255

1/54

2300

658

0/358

1/63

1230/20

KGS2

2000

1210

0/573

0/90

1555/3

1605

KGS3

2400

1750

0/995

0/63

2049/3

2075

650

KGS4

2026

1090

0/523

1/06

1486

1558

936

1890

1660

0/743

0/29

1771/2

1775

230

STI

SSI

GMP

MP

TOL

0/97

1449/4

1505

810

1038/53

1216/3

1267

1479

1642
790

:YP :YS . :STI. :SSI.

:GMP :MP . :TOL .
.4

STI

SSI

GMP

MP

TOL

1
**0/975

1
-0/321
0/328

1
0/228
*-0/799
*0/811

1
-0/49
-0/30
**0/920
**-0/917

YS

YP

t/ha

t/ha

1
*-0/795
**0/899
0/221
**-0/951
**0/943

1
0/515
0/136
*0/683
0/051
-0/212
0/415

YP
YS
TOL
MP
GMP
SSI
STI

:YP :YS. :STI.SSI.

:GMP :MP . :TOL .

162

 78 1387

) (MP ) (GMP
) (TOL ) (SSI
) (STI )
( .
) .( 3

4 . )(
5 ) (KGS3 ) 2400 (
. )(KGS3
) 1750 ( ) .(3
MP GMP STI (KGS3) 5
. ) (TOL

.

) ( TOL
.
. ) (1

MP MP
( 22 ) Fernandez
MP

.
4
. ) (YS
) (YP ) .(r=0/535
MP STI
0/01 ) (TOL ) (SsI
0/05 0/01
. 5
1 ) (MP
. ) (MP
. ) ( 11

MP GMP STI . ) ( 9
18 STI
GMP .
) ( 7
MP TOL
STI MP .
) (2
STI GMP

( 22 ) Fernandez .

163

(
) .(A (
) .( B(
) .( C(
) ) D
A
MP
KGS3

A KGS3



B
A
.

- 1 1376 .
. .
238..
- 2 . . 1381.
.
. .
.
- 3 1366 . ) ,
, ( . 4,3,2,1.
- 4 1373 . .
.
- 5 1368 . )
( . ,
.
- 6 . . . 1377 .
.
. . .284
- 7 .1377.
.
. .224
- 8 1356 .1 . .

 ...
- 9 1383 .
. . .6 27- 38 .2.
- 10 1366 .
, 4.7
- 11 . . .
1379
.
.64-75:(10)12
- 12 1374 . . .
- 13 1367 . .
.
- 14 1364 . ) , ,
( . . .
- 15 1379 .
.
.
- 16 . ,1377 .

. . . .
- 17 . . 1375.
.
.24-33(3)12.
- 18 . .1379.
.

.25-38:(3)2.
- 19 1382.
.
.
- 20 , , 1370 . .
.
21- Bonnet H.J,Nelson D.E, Jensen R.G.1995;.Adaptations to
environmental stresses. Plant Physiol.19:493-500.
22- Fernandez , G , C. J. 1992; Effective selection criteria
for assessing plant stress tolerance.pp.257-270.In: Kuo , C.
G.(ed).Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaption
of Vegetables and other Food Crops to Temperature Water
Stress.Taiwan.
23-Girirag, K. and., J.V, Goud. 1983; Association of yied
components and development traits in grain sorghum. Indian J.
Agric. Sci., 53:5-8.
24 - Gupta P,Sheoranis.1983; Response of some enzymes of
nitrogen metabolism to water stress in two species of brassica.
Plant Physiol. Biochem.10:513.
25- Moldenhauer. W.C. and W. 1957; Narrow row soil. Water
sorghum conservation. South Westen Crop and Stock. 11-12.
26-Vanderilp, R.I.and Hans.E.R.1972; Growth. Stages of
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor
L.Moench). Agron.J.64:13-16).

164