Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Prepared by the Poverty Reduction Through Social Entrepreneurship [PRESENT] Coalition 29 June 2012
A PROPOSED PRIORITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA IN THE PRESIDENTS STATE OF THE NATION ADDRESS TO ENSURE POVERTY-REDUCTION FOR AN INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH
The Social Enterprise Sector has banded together to seek for a favorable policy environment for social-mission driven wealthcreating organizations among poor communities. This brief explains what contributions does social enterprises have in achieving inclusive economic growth and poverty-reduction and why it is needed now.
CASE 1: THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF COOPERATIVES OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITY (PWD FED)
The National Federation of Cooperatives of Persons with Disability (PWD Fed) is a 15 year old organization that is now employing some 1,250 PWDs. It has an annual revenue of PhP 48 million shared by 15 cooperatives nationwide. The organization is governed a Board who were elected by its member cooperatives. PWD Fed has proven that through social enterprise jobs were not only generated or incomes were increased but there were empowerment and transformational changes in their lives.
CASE 2. CARD-MRI: DEMONSTRATING THE ROLE OF NON-COLLATERAL LOANS IN FORMING AN ARMY OF ENTREPRENEURS IN THE COUNTRYSIDE.
CARD MRI started in 1986 as a normal NGO that helped the landless rural poor uplift their quality of life. After 10 years of operation, it evolved into a Microfinance Institution (MFI) under the leadership of its founder and Ramon Magsaysay awardee, Dr. Jaime Aristotle B. Alip. IMPACTS EMPOWERMENT OF THE POOREST MOTHERS. As of September 2011, CARD MRI caters to 1.5 million poorest of the poor mothers Total Number of Clients Served Number of Clients including Savers Total Number of Clients with Loans Total Number of Insured Persons Amount of Loans Outstanding Total Amount of Savings/CBU Repayment Rate 1,510,083 1,461,488 1,432,056 7,160,280 PhP 6.1 B PhP 4 B 99%
The objective of the foundation was to create a financial institution thats owned and managed by the poor, particularly the mothers. CARD-MRI SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE wanted to move towards the direction Total Asset PhP 11.5 B of assisting women because not only do Total Liabilities PhP 8.9 B they have the capability to translate Total Equity/Fund Balance PhP 2.5 B credit into income-generating activities, Operational Self-Sufficiency 125.81% but their first priority will always be the Financial Self-Sufficiency 109.69% familyfood and education, housing, clothing, basic things. By doing this, CARD-MRI believed that this will bring total change in the family
The instrument was providing microloans that would not require collaterals which at that time, was unthought about. Back then, majority of the population had no access to credit from big banks, even rural banks because the existing regulation then was that 70 percent of pure loans must be collateralized. What makes CARD MRI different from other MFIs is that their loans are 100 percent collateral-free, challenging the conventional banking wisdom that there should be a collateral. Without this innovation, CARD MRI would not be
Alter Trade successfully transformed their farmer-partners into effective suppliers of organic or muscuvado sugar through management capacity building services in addition to credit and sustainable technology. They centered on boosting capacities of communities on sustainable agriculture, fair trading practices, management of their production, credit and finance, and development of their resources.
The story of Alter Trade has shown that social enterprises are powerful and effective tools of improving quality of lives of the poor and scaling up their capabilities in managing resources. From transactional partners who benefitted through increased incomes, the farmer-partners played a key role in providing solutions to their poverty. They became empowered producers who gained a significant voice their own agricultural value chains. The government plays an important role in upscaling their operations by developing the value chain either through capacity building, investment in technology on the production side or through policies that would increase and protect the market of the social enterprises or by providing tax incentives. Why decision is needed now? Social enterprises make wealth-creation processes inclusive of the poor, a goal shared at the national and global development levels. They provide jobs and incomes in areas where government and private sector cannot due to limited finance or markets. Recognizing the contributions of social enterprises through a policy in place shall complement and sustain the efforts in the 609 focus poor municipalities of the governments priority areas for poverty-reduction. Putting in place a policy environment for social enterprises responds to the need of poor communities to see a sustainable way of ensuring access to income in the context of an ending comprehensive agricultural reform program and culmination of the governments conditional cash transfer (CCT) program as its poverty-reduction tool. At this point, the government must propose a concrete graduation scheme for its beneficiaries. Support for social entrepreneurship comes very timely and appropriate for this administration, in a juncture where income inequities is a central public issue. What course of action is recommended? The US, Europe and South Korea have existing legislations that were crafted as a result of their own economic crises. The US legislated Social Business measures as a response to the economic downturn in the 70s and 80s due to the large cutbacks in US federal funding severely affecting NPOs conducting development programs. Europe has more advanced social enterprise measures and programs in social enterprises which were borne out of crises in the 80s when welfare states retreated from public services. South Koreas legislation was basically a response to their unemployment issues. In the Philippines, the social enterprises flourished as a result of worsening poverty resulting from the failure of state and market institutions to serve the needs of the poor. The non-government and development community or organizations had also started to experience the drying up of grants from partners in the North. It is recommended that HB 6085 or the Social Enterprise Bill be included as one of the priority legislation when the President addresses the legislature and the people in his State of the Nation Address. HB 6085 seeks to provide a nurturing environment for the development and growth of strong, pro-active and innovative social enterprises as major vehicles for poverty-reduction. It enacts a planning and implementation of a National Poverty Reduction Through Social Entrepreneurship (PRESENT) Program. The National PRESENT Program delves with the development of strategic economic subsectors with potentials for growth and where the poor are concentrated or could be major players. It aims to benefit the poor through increased incomes and capability to improve their means of living as workers, suppliers, clients and/or owners of SEs in strategic economic subsectors and as partners in economic and social development.
House Bill 6085 seeks to provide: Provision of accessible non-collateralized loans thru special credit windows with a Guarantee Fund Pool Comprehensive insurance system to reduce vulnerability to climate change/calamities Resources for comprehensive capacity development for SEs and poor as partners (transactional and transformational services); mainstream SE content in formal educational system Proactive SE market development program promoting principles of fair trade Research and Development on strategic economic subsectors; appropriate technologies; and innovations to democratize access of poor to quality basic social services Recognition and support for LGUs in developing social enterprises Preferential treatment in government procurement including coverage of performance bonds Tax exemptions and tax breaks for SEs and social investors Cash incentives (i.e. at least 25% of minimum wage for social enterprises employing PWDs) Placing it in the priority agenda of this Government would also open the gatekeepers of banks, donors, agencies, local executives and other institutions to provide access to appropriate funding, investments for inputs, technology, training and procurement. The Social Enterprise Bill is a timely and appropriate piece of legislation that this country needs in this time of continuing inequities. The opportunity cost of not supporting SEs is insurmountable: public investments poured for short-term poverty-reduction strategies, environmental degradation due to unsustainable patterns of production, loss of jobs for marginalized sectors such as PWDs, youth, rural farmers, etc). and slow economic growth in communities. Social entrepreneurship fosters a more equitable society by addressing social issues and by achieving lasting impact through their social mission rather than purely profit accumulation. It complements povertyreduction efforts of government in communities wanting to move out of poverty in a sustainable manner.
Sources: 1. The Role Of Social Enterprise In Local Economic Development. Karl Birkhlzer. Interdisciplinary Research Group Local nd Economy, Technical University of Berlin, Germany, July 1-4, 2009, 2 EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise. 2. Remarks by ADB Vice-President Stephen P. Groff at the Impact Forum: "Igniting Capital Markets for Social Good," National University of Singapore, 25 June 2012 3. Creating the Space in the Market. Social Enterprise Stories in Asia by Maria Lisa Dacanay. 2004. 4. World Bank, 2004 5. The Social Enterprise Sector. A conceptual Approach. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Local Economic and Employment Development Programme 6. House Bill 6085 or the Magna Carta for Social Enterprises of 2012. 7. Jaime Aristotle Alip, Rural Banking Innovation: The Next Generation. Presentation to RBAP Symposium, November 11, 2011
Ateneo Center for Social Entrepreneurship (ACSENT) o ACSENT is the Center for social entrepreneurship in Ateneo de Manila University. It provides capacity-building services for social enterprises.
Eagle's Wings Development Foundation Philippines, Inc.-ASEF A development foundation duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with the primary purpose of developing and strengthening the capacity of social entrepreneurs through its Value Chain Development Program. Foundation for a Sustainable Society (FSSI), Co-Convenor o The FSSI is organization committed to support the development of sustainable communities through social entrepreneurship. Since 1995, we have developed social enterprises with triple bottom lines in marginalized communities that are owned, managed and operated by the poor, economically sound andenvironmentally-friendly. We are a network of 19 dynamic network organizations spreading across the country in the field of social and economic work.
Foundation for These-Abled Persons, Inc (FTI) Initiated by individual members of the National Federation of Cooperatives of Persons with Disability (NFCPWD), supporters of NFCPWD and the Federation as an organization, FTI was born. It was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 19, 2009 and started to formally operate in December of the same year. FTI is a catalyst of change to enable organizations of PWDs to be economically self-sufficient and meaningfully participate in an inclusive and supportive environment.
International Network of Alternative Financial Institutions- Philippines (INAFI) INAFI or the Internat ional Network of Al ternat ive Financial Institutions was founded in Cuzco, Peru in March 1 9 9 5 . Twenty four representatives of microfiance institutions and NGOs coming from the regions of Africa, Latin America and Asia, all partner organizations of NOVIB, a Dutch NGO, came together to form the INAFI International Network. MicroVentures Inc.
MVI is composed of dedicated professionals who aspire to be the leading partners of micro entrepreneurs in the country. We believe that micro financing is a powerful tool to empower socially and economically challenged families.
Philippine Coffee Alliance- Small Farmers Sector The Philippine Coffee Alliance represents the cross section of the value chain of Philippine coffee .The PCAs purpose is to promote and protect the interests of the Philippine coffee industry .
Philippine Social Enterprise Network (PhilSEN) PhilSEN traces its roots from a loose network (IGA Network) of NGOs, development institutions, peoples organizations, & cooperatives engaged in social enterprise promotion and development including microfinance/savings & credit among the poor communities/groups. Since 1999, the network focuses on enhancing capacities of member organizations through subsector analysis, value chain analysis and market studies, business planning and monitoring, business development services, social entrepreneurship capacity building, markets and products development, including micro-finance/ savings and credit. Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement (PRRM) The Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement was founded in 1952. It traces its roots to China where, in the early 1900s, the rural reconstruction movement was born, inspired and led by Dr. Y. C. James Yen Yen Yangchu. PRRM, a movement committed to the caused of the Filipino peasant, began as a small group of prominent Filipinos led by Dean Conrado Benitez of the University of the Philippines. It pioneered a whole era or rural development and local democracy in the country. PRRM was the first NGO to send its workers to the villages to implement its integrated, fourfold program of education, livelihood, health, and self-governance. PRRM pioneered the establishment of an elected barrio government. Todays Barangay Council can be claimed by PRRM as one of its contributions to grassroots democracy. PRRM inspired the formation of similar national movements in Colombia, Guatemala, Ghana, India and Thailand.
WFTO-Philippines is a coalition of Philippine producer groups, marketing organizations and support organizations, as well as individual advocates, commonly adhering to the principles and goals of Fair Trade. It works for the development of progressive and responsible Fair Trade stakeholders in the Philippines, and ensure that each member organization engages in their commitment to the principles and standards of Fair Trade: providing income and food security in disadvantaged communities; empowering community based producers; and promoting a quality and market driven image of Fair Trade products.